腹腔镜治疗肾囊肿16例

目的 探讨腹腔镜手术治疗单纯性肾囊肿疗效。方法 采用经腹腔和经腹膜后腹腔镜技术对16例单纯性肾囊肿行囊肿去顶术,并回顾分析比较20例开放性肾囊肿去顶术。结果 经腹腔途径手术时间与开放手术无显著性差异(P>0.05),经腹膜后途径手术时间显著长于开放手术(P<0.05),腹腔镜手术患者的术中失血量、术后并发症及术后住院时间均显著少于开放手术(P<0.01)。结论 腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术具有创伤小、术后并发症少及康复快等优点,治疗单纯性肾囊肿的疗效明显优于开放性手术。     

腹腔镜与开放性肾囊肿去顶术的比较

目的 :比较开放性与腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术的疗效和优点。方法 :采用腹腔镜经腹腔途径对 4 3例肾囊肿患者进行肾囊肿去顶术。并与 2 4例开放性肾囊肿去顶术患者进行比较。结果 :腹腔镜手术时间、术后住院时间均显著少于开放性手术 (P <0 0 1)。术后随访 3～ 12个月 ,未见复发。结论 :经腹腔途径腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术治疗肾囊肿 ,疗效好 ,患者创伤小 ,术后康复快 ,明显优于开放性手术。     

经腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术治疗单纯性肾囊肿

目的 :探讨经腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术治疗单纯性肾囊肿的手术方法及注意事项。方法 :回顾分析 1 1例经腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术治疗单纯性肾囊肿的临床资料。结果 :手术成功率 1 0 0 % ,无中转开放手术和输血病例 ,未发生严重并发症。结论 :经腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术治疗单纯性肾囊肿安全有效 ,患者创伤小 ,康复快     

经后腹腔腹腔镜与开放性肾囊肿去顶术疗效比较

目的：比较经后腹腔腹腔镜与开放性肾囊肿去顶术的疗效，并探讨经后腹腔腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术处理要点。方法：回顾性分析9例经后腹腔腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术和21例开放性肾囊肿去顶术患者的临床资料，比较两组手术时间、术中失血量和术后住院天数等指标。结果：两组手术时间比较，差异无显著性意义（P＞0.05)，但经后腹腔腹腔镜手术组术中失血量及术后住院时间均显著少于开放性手术组（P＜0.01)。结论：经后腹腔腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术具有创伤小，患者康复快、疼痛轻的优点，治疗单纯性肾囊肿的疗效明显优于开放性手术。     

腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术65例报告

目的:探讨腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术的方法.方法:回顾分析经腹膜后途径行腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术65例的临床资料.结果:64例手术获得成功,1例因肾实质损伤中转开放手术.结论:腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术具有患者创伤小、出血少、康复快等优点,宜作为肾囊肿外科治疗的首选术式.     

后腹腔镜与开放性肾囊肿去顶术疗效比较

目的比较后腹腔镜与开放性肾囊肿去顶术的疗效,并探讨后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术处理要点。方法回顾性分析22例(后腹腔镜组)经后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术和41例(开放手术组)开放性肾囊肿去顶术患者的临床资料,比较2组手术时间、术中出血量和术后并发症、住院天数等指标。结果 2组手术均获得成功,后腹腔镜组手术时间、术中出血量、并发症发生率、术后住院时间均显著少于开放手术组(P0.05)。结论经后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术具有创伤小,患者恢复快、疼痛轻的优点,疗效明显优于开放手术。     

经腹膜后腹腔镜囊肿去顶术治疗肾囊肿的初步体会

目的：总结经腹膜后腹腔镜囊肿去顶术治疗单纯性肾囊肿的经验，讨论手术适应证和手术要点，方法：采用经腹膜后腹腔镜囊肿去顶术治疗肾囊肿患者32例，结果：31例手术成功，1例转为开放手术，微小并发症发生率为16％，技术熟练后无并发症发生，1例术后3个月复发，术后平均住院3天，结论：经腹膜后腹腔镜囊肿去顶术创伤小，患者康复快，宜为肾囊肿外科治疗的首选术式。     

腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术对机体应激反应的影响

目的 :探讨腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶减压术对机体应激反应的影响。方法 :随机将肾囊肿 35例分成腹膜后腹腔镜组与开放手术组 ,分别于术前 2 4h和术后第 1、3天测定血白细胞总数 (WBC)、血清C 反应蛋白质 (CRP)和白细胞介素 6 (IL 6 )的浓度 ,并比较两组的平均手术时间 ,术中出血量 ,术后平均引流量 ,镇痛用药量 ,发热率 ,平均住院日和费用。结果 :开放手术组术后第 1天WBC计数比术前明显升高 (P <0 0 1) ,腹膜后腹腔镜组升高不明显 (P >0 .0 5 )。两组术后第 1、3天血清CRP和IL 6水平高于术前 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,开放手术组血清CRP和IL 6明显高于后腹腔镜组 (P <0 .0 1)。与开放手术相比 ,腹膜后腹腔镜手术具有出血少 ,引流量少 ,术后发热率低 ,用药少 ,住院日短等优点。结论 :腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术对机体的应激反应较开放手术低 ,有望取代传统开放手术     

经腹腔和腹膜后途径腹腔镜治疗肾囊肿术

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腔、腹膜后途径治疗肾囊肿的方法。方法对47例肾囊肿患者经腹腔、腹膜后途径行腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术。结果经腹腔途径手术35例,4例中转;经腹膜后途径手术12例,2例中转。结论经腹腔、腹膜后途径腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术创伤小、恢复快、方法简便,同时提出二孔法效果更好。     

腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术65例报告

目的:总结腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术的手术经验。方法:回顾分析2004年8月至2011年6月为65例患者行腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术的临床资料。其中男44例,女21例;28～77岁,平均53岁。结果:65例均顺利完成腹膜后腹腔镜手术,无一例中转开放。64例行肾囊肿去顶术,1例改行腹腔镜肾部分切除术。手术时间30～120 min,平均42 min。患者均未输血。术中、术后无明显并发症发生。65例患者均获随访,随访3～60个月,行B超或CT检查,均无囊肿或肿瘤复发。结论:腹膜后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术治疗单纯性肾囊肿安全、有效,值得推广应用。     

两种后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术式治疗单纯性肾囊肿的对比研究

目的 比较传统后腹腔镜和单孔后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术两种术式治疗单纯性肾囊肿的优缺点.方法 回顾性分析采用传统后腹腔镜术式或者单孔后腹腔镜术式行肾囊肿去顶术治疗单纯性肾囊肿的临床资料.结果 2种术式治疗单纯性肾囊肿均未见术中并发症,术后复查均未见复发;两种术式在术中出血量、术后禁食时间、留置引流管的时间、术后住院时间方面,均无统计学差异(P＞0.05);在手术时间、术后下床活动时间、手术当天疼痛评分、术后并发症方面,均有统计学差异(P＜0.05).结论 在现有条件下,在治疗单纯性肾囊肿这一疾病,单孔后腹腔镜术式并不比传统后腹腔镜术式具有更明显的优势.     

单纯性肾囊肿两种去顶术式对比研究

目的：比较和评价单纯性肾囊肿腹腔镜去顶术和开放性去顶术的治疗效果。方法：180例单纯性肾囊肿者采用腹腔镜去顶术122例，开放性去顶术58你，对两种术式的临床疗效。术后恢复及费用等进行对比研究。结果：腹腔镜组腰痛消失者70．6％（72／122），腰好转者27．4％（28／122）；开放手术组腰痛消失者75．9％（41／58），腰痛好转者18．5％（10／58）；两组比较差别无显著性意义（P＞0．05）。术手两组均无复发。腹腔镜组术后均未注射止痛剂，平均发热4.1d，住院8.1d，伤口疼痛麻木持续2个月，开放手术组术后31．0％（18／58）注射止痛剂，平均发热5.4d，住院11.8d。伤口疼痛麻木持续9个月，两组间比较差别均有显著性意义（P＜0．05）。术后并发症发生率腹腔镜组成5．75（7／122），主要为肾周血肿、手术区积液及感染等；开放手术组为8．5％（5／58），主要为伤口感染，应激性溃疡，下肢静脉血栓形成等。腹腔镜组平均住院费用和手术费用均高于开放手术组（P＜0．05），但1999年与1995年比较，腹镜组两项费用均无显著变化，而开放的术组分别上涨了38．9％和92．9％。结论：腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术民开放性肾囊肿去顶术相比，疗效相似，但是前者创伤小，痛苦少，恢复快，并发症少，尽管目前腹腔镜手术的直接费用较高，但能节约患者的住院时间，使间接费用降低。     

后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术(附38例报告)

目的探讨后腹腔镜技术在肾囊肿去顶术中的应用。方法回顾性分析38例后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术患者的临床资料,其中,右肾16例,左肾22例,肾上极12例,肾中部16例,肾下极10例。结果除1例因肾周严重粘连而改行开放手术,余37例均手术成功,手术时间45~120(平均65)min,手术出血量10~80(平均40)ml,术后住院时间3~12(平均6)天。结论后腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术疗效确切,创伤小,是目前治疗单纯性肾囊肿的最佳选择。     

闭合式经后腹腔镜腔镜肾囊肿去顶

OBJECTIVE: To study the close method of retroperitoneal laparoscopic unroofing of renal cyst. METHOD: A close method retroperitoneal laparoscopic unroofing of renal cyst was attempted in 35 cases between May 1995 and December 1996. The age of the patients ranged from 30 to 72 and the cyst size from 4.0 to 9.3 cm. RESULTS: The operative procedure took around 50 minutes. After a 1 - 18 month follow up, we observed the disappearance of all renal cysts. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic procedure renders less trauma and discomfort to the patients and may be better indicated for symptomatic, simple renal cysts.     

Three Approaches for Laparoscopic Unroofing of Simple and Complicated Renal Cysts

We report 2 cases of simple renal cysts which were marsupialized with 2 laparoscopic approaches involving either transperitoneal, with reflection of the colon medially or dissection through the mesocolon, and a case of a multilocular renal cyst which was treated by the retroperitoneal approach. Although laparoscopic unroofing of a renal cyst is a safe and effective alternative to open surgical techniques, the transperitoneal approach should only be used for simple renal cysts. The retroperitoneal approach for complicated renal cysts may be indicated if preoperative examinations exclude the possibility of malignancy.     

后腹腔镜手术在泌尿外科的应用(附87例报告)

目的探讨后腹腔镜在治疗肾上腺、肾脏及输尿管疾病中的临床效果. 方法采用闭合式腹膜后间隙穿刺建立手术空间和通道的方法,对87例肾上腺疾病、肾囊性疾病、输尿管结石及输尿管畸形患者实施后腹腔镜手术. 结果 83例获得成功,中转开放手术4例,无输血,无严重并发症发生,疗效满意. 结论后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术、肾囊肿切除术、输尿管切开取石术及输尿管松解成形术具有创伤小、出血少、并发症少等优点,临床疗效可靠,实用性较强.     

Prior abdominal surgery and radiation do not complicate the retroperitoneoscopic approach to the kidney or adrenal gland

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery is an accepted standard of care. This can be accomplished by a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. In patients with extensive prior intra-abdominal surgery with or without radiation the retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach may avoid bowel adhesions and potential operative complications. We compared clinical outcomes of the laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach in patients with prior open abdominal surgery with or without radiation to outcomes in those with no surgical history. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated clinical and functional parameters in 78 consecutive patients undergoing retroperitoneoscopic renal or adrenal surgery performed by a single surgeon in a 36-month period, including radical nephrectomy with or without ureterectomy in 50, nerve sparing surgery in 8, ablation in 16 and adrenalectomy in 4. All transperitoneal procedures during the same period were excluded from analysis. Patients were divided into 48 who underwent prior abdominal surgery with or without radiation (group 1) and 30 who did not (group 2). Prior abdominal surgeries in group 1 patients were open and they were major in 42 and/or minor in 39. An additional 6 patients in group 1 received prior abdominal radiation overlapping the planned surgical field. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were noted between the groups in any parameter assessed, including operative time, blood loss, time to first oral intake, hospital stay or the complication rate (p >0.05). There were no enterotomies in either group. There were no open conversions in group 1, while there were 2 in group 2 (renal vein injury and splenorrhaphy secondary to lymphoma, respectively). Pathological findings showed malignancy in 57 cases (renal cell carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma, carcinoid disease and metastases) and benign disease in 21 (oncocytoma, adenoma, pyelonephritis and complex cysts). All margins were negative except in 1 group patient with carcinoma in situ at the bladder cuff margin. CONCLUSIONS: The retroperitoneoscopic approach to the kidney and adrenal glands can be used in patients with extensive prior open abdominal surgery and/or radiation without significant increases in morbidity or convalescence.