Flat Epithelial Atypia and Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia: Carcinoma Underestimation Rate

Abstract: This study was carried out to determine the underestimation rate of carcinoma upon surgical biopsy after a diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia and 11‐gauge vacuum‐assisted breast biopsy. A retrospective review was conducted of 476 vacuum‐assisted breast biopsy performed from May 2005 to January 2007 and a total of 70 cases of atypia were identified. Fifty cases (71%) were categorized as pure atypical ductal hyperplasia, 18 (26%) as pure flat epithelial atypia and two (3%) as concomitant flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Each group were compared with the subsequent open surgical specimens. Surgical biopsy was performed in 44 patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia, 15 patients with flat epithelial atypia, and two patients with flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Five cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia were upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ, three cases of flat epithelial atypia yielded one ductal carcinoma in situ and two cases of invasive ductal carcinoma, and one case of flat epithelial atypia/atypical ductal hyperplasia had invasive ductal carcinoma. The overall rate of malignancy was 16% for atypical ductal hyperplasia (including flat epithelial atypia/atypical ductal hyperplasia patients) and 20% for flat epithelial atypia. The presence of flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia at biopsy requires careful consideration, and surgical excision should be suggested.     

Erratum to: Axillary Recurrence Rate Following Negative Sentinel Node Biopsy for Invasive Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up

Objective  

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as the staging procedure for breast cancer. SLN biopsy causes less morbidity and is more cost effective than complete ALND. Lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy have a low false-negative rate, but long-term outcomes in large consecutive series of patients are unavailable.     

Lithium-induced nephropathy: Rate of progression and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND: Long-term lithium administration in humans may lead to chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis, which develops very slowly. Its progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has been rarely reported. The aim of this study is to document the rate of progression of lithium-induced nephropathy and its prognostic factors, and to provide an estimation of the percentage of lithium-induced ESRD in France. METHODS: Two groups have been studied: 54 patients with lithium-induced renal failure, nine of whom underwent renal biopsy; and 20 patients who were referred for systematic renal biopsy, 14 of whom were subsequently followed up. In addition, a survey of lithium-induced ESRD was conducted in French dialysis centers. RESULTS: The mean annual loss of creatinine clearance in patients with lithium-induced nephropathy was 2.29 mL/min. Among 74 patients, 12 reached ESRD at a mean age of 65 years. Creatinine clearance at referral and at last follow-up was inversely related to the duration of lithium therapy in both univariate and multivariate analyses adjusting for age, gender, hypertension, and proteinuria. The degree of interstitial fibrosis on renal biopsy was also related to the lithium duration and cumulative dose. It was predictive of the final creatinine clearance. About 35% of the patients tested had moderate hypercalcemia, due to hyperparathyroidism. The prevalence of lithium-related ESRD in France was estimated as two per 1000 dialysis patients. The average latency between onset of lithium therapy and ESRD was 20 years. CONCLUSION: Lithium-induced chronic renal disease is slowly progressive. Its rate of progression is related to the duration of lithium administration. Lithium-related ESRD represents 0.22% of all causes of ESRD in France. Regular monitoring of estimated creatinine clearance is mandatory in long-term lithium-treated patients.     

Protocol for the TRANSLATE prospective,multicentre, randomised clinical trial of prostate biopsy technique

Objectives

Primary objectives: to determine whether local anaesthetic transperineal prostate (LATP) biopsy improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group ≥2 disease (i.e., any Gleason pattern 4 disease), compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsy, in biopsy-naïve men undergoing biopsy based on suspicion of csPCa. Secondary objectives: to compare (i) infection rates, (ii) health-related quality of life, (iii) patient-reported procedure tolerability, (iv) patient-reported biopsy-related complications (including bleeding, bruising, pain, loss of erectile function), (v) number of subsequent prostate biopsy procedures required, (vi) cost-effectiveness, (vii) other histological parameters, and (viii) burden and rate of detection of clinically insignificant PCa (ISUP Grade Group 1 disease) in men undergoing these two types of prostate biopsy.

Patients and Methods

The TRANSLATE trial is a UK-wide, multicentre, randomised clinical trial that meets the criteria for level-one evidence in diagnostic test evaluation. TRANSLATE is investigating whether LATP biopsy leads to a higher rate of detection of csPCa compared to TRUS prostate biopsy. Both biopsies are being performed with an average of 12 systematic cores in six sectors (depending on prostate size), plus three to five target cores per multiparametric/bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging lesion. LATP biopsy is performed using an ultrasound probe-mounted needle-guidance device (either the ‘Precision-Point’ or BK UA1232 system). TRUS biopsy is performed according to each hospital's standard practice. The study is 90% powered to detect a 10% difference (LATP biopsy hypothesised at 55% detection rate for csPCa vs 45% for TRUS biopsy). A total of 1042 biopsy-naïve men referred with suspected PCa need to be recruited.

Conclusions

This trial will provide robust prospective data to determine the diagnostic ability of LATP biopsy vs TRUS biopsy in the primary diagnostic setting.     

Upgrade Rate and Imaging Features of Atypical Apocrine Lesions

The purpose of our work was to identify imaging features of atypical apocrine lesions and determine the rate of upgrade to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive carcinoma at excision after such a diagnosis on percutaneous breast biopsy. From January 1, 2006, through October 8, 2013, a total of 33,157 breast core biopsies were performed at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Of those, 58 (0.2%) showed atypical apocrine lesions. For 24, atypical apocrine adenosis (AAA) or atypical apocrine metaplasia (AAM) was the only risk lesion, with no known ipsilateral malignancy, and the results of excision were available. The median patient age was 58 years (range 43–88). Among 24 atypical apocrine lesions (20 AAA and 4 AAM), four (16.7%; 95% confidence interval: 4.7, 37.4) were upgraded at excision: one invasive ductal carcinoma (grade 2, 0.2 cm, estrogen receptor positive, progesterone receptor positive, HER2/Neu negative) and three DCIS (two grade 3, one grade 2). All four upgraded lesions were AAA (20%; 4/20). Twelve AAA were seen as an irregular (n = 9) or circumscribed (n = 3) mass on ultrasound; three masses had calcifications. Six of 20 (30%) AAA were seen on biopsy of calcifications only and calcifications were within two AAA lesions at histopathology. One AAA (1/20, 5%) was asymmetry only, and one (1/20, 5%) a persistently enhancing MR focus. All four malignancies were masses on ultrasound (three irregular, one circumscribed), and three malignancies had calcifications (two coarse heterogeneous, one amorphous). While concordant with an irregular or circumscribed mass on imaging, with or without amorphous or coarse heterogeneous calcifications, AAA merits excision with a 20% upgrade rate to malignancy. Further study of AAM is warranted.     

Biopsy Method and Excision Volume Do Not Affect Success Rate of Subsequent Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is becoming a recognized technique for accurately staging patients with breast cancer. Its success in patients with large tumors or prior excisions has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of biopsy method, excision volume, interval from biopsy to SLND, tumor size, and tumor location on SLND success rate.Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent SLND followed by completion axillary lymph node dissection from October 1991 to December 1995 were analyzed. Included were cases performed early in the series before the technique was adequately developed. Excision volume was derived from the product of three dimensions as measured by the pathologist. Two end points were analyzed: sentinel node identification rate and accuracy of SLND in predicting axillary status. Univariate analyses using x2 or Fishers exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sums for continuous variables were performed. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression.Results: There were 284 SLND procedures performed on 283 patients. Median age was 55 years. The most recent biopsy method used before SLND was stereotactic core biopsy in 41 (14%), fine-needle aspiration in 62 (22%), and excision in 181 (64%) procedures. The mean excision volume was 32 ml with a range of 0.3–169 ml. The mean time from biopsy to SLND was 17 days with a range of 0–140 days. The mean tumor size was 2.0 cm (15 Tis [5%], 184 T1 [65%], 72 T2 [25%], and 13 T3 [5%]). Tumors were located in the outer quadrants in 74%, the inner quadrants in 18%, and subareolar region in 8%. The sentinel node was identified in 81%, and 39% had metastases. There were three false-negative cases early in the series. Sensitivity was 97%, and accuracy was 99%. Negative predictive value was 98% in cases in which the sentinel node was identified. On the basis of biopsy method, excisional volume, time from biopsy to SLND, tumor size, and tumor location, there was no statistically significant difference (P..05) in sentinel node identification rate or accuracy of SLND.Conclusions: SLND has a high success rate in breast cancer patients regardless of the biopsy method or the excision volume removed before SLND. In addition, the interval from biopsy to SLND, tumor size, and tumor location have no effect on the success rate of SLND, even in this series which included patients operated on before the technique was adequately defined. Patients with breast cancers located in any quadrant and diagnosed either with a needle or excisional biopsy could be evaluated for trials of SLND.Presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Oralando, Florida, March 4–7, 1999.     

Repeat prostate biopsy in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in a cohort of men undergoing prostate cancer screening who have a negative initial biopsy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The Prostate, Colorectal, Lung, and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial is an ongoing study the prostate component of which consists of six annual screens with measurements of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and a digital rectal examination (DRE). The diagnostic follow-up of positive screening results is done by the subject's healthcare provider outside the purview of the PLCO. We analysed the experience of repeat biopsy in men in the PLCO with an initial negative biopsy. Men were divided by indication for initial biopsy into those with suspicious PSA levels and those with suspicious DRE findings. RESULTS: The probability of having a repeat biopsy within 3 years of initial biopsy was 43% for 1736 men with suspicious PSA levels and 13% for 1025 men with suspicious DRE findings. Rates of third and fourth biopsy after a previous negative biopsy were similar to the initial repeat biopsy rate in PSA-positive men. Most men had a repeat biopsy only after having an additional round of screening. The PSA level and PSA velocity determined after initial biopsy were independent risk factors for a repeat biopsy, both in PSA-positive and DRE-positive men. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was a risk factor for repeat biopsy before any repeat PSA or DRE testing. CONCLUSION: The experience of this cohort should be generally representative of patterns of care for repeat biopsy in men undergoing periodic screening. These data can provide context to the debate over optimum practices for repeat biopsy.     

Additional Tracer Injection to Improve the Technical Success Rate of Lymphoscintigraphy for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

Background  Sentinel node (SN) biopsy has become the standard of care in the treatment of breast cancer. The aim of this study is to determine the value of additional tracer injection to increase the technical success rate of the SN procedure and to identify factors that influence the ability to visualize hotspots. Methods  From February 1997 to August 2007, 1,208 clinically node-negative breast cancer patients underwent lymphatic mapping for SN biopsy. The technique involved the injection of 370 MBq (10 mCi) Tc-99 m-nanocolloid peritumorally. In case of insufficient or absent visualization of hotspots 37 MBq (1 mCi) of additional tracer was given intracutaneously above the tumor. Results  In 93 patients (7.7%) visualization of hotspots on initial lymphoscintigraphy was insufficient (41 patients) or absent (52 patients). The first 14 patients did not receive additional tracer injection. In five patients, additional tracer did not result in successful lymphoscintigraphy, which is correlated with massive nodal tumor infiltration. In 33 patients with negative initial lymphoscintigraphy, additional tracer injection resulted in secondary SN visualization. In 41 patients with faint hotspots on initial lymphoscintigraphy, additional tracer injection, by increasing nodal uptake, simplified accurate SN biopsy. Decreased radiotracer uptake in this group was associated with older age and high body mass index (BMI). Conclusions  Additional tracer injection following initial scan failure increases the success rate of lymphoscintigraphy during lymphatic mapping in breast cancer, without compromising accuracy. If additional tracer injection does not result in secondary SN visualization, gross nodal tumor involvement is often present and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is mandatory.     

Rate,Factors, and Outcome of Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation of Deceased Donors

BackgroundDelayed graft function (DGF) is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation affecting long-term outcome.Patients and methodsA total of 525 consecutive recipients (age 54.2 ± 13.4 years, 33% female) of kidneys from deceased donors transplanted between 2005 and 2012 were retrospectively examined. DGF was defined as the need of dialysis within the first week after transplantation.ResultsDGF developed in 21.1% (n = 111). Factors associated with DGF (P ≤ .035, respectively) were recipient body mass index, C-reactive protein of the recipient, residual diuresis, cold ischemia time, donor age, and diuresis in the first hour after transplantation. Median duration of DGF was 16 (2-66) days. Patients after DGF had a significantly lower GFR compared with recipients without DGF either after 3 (32.9 ± 16.5 vs 46.3 ± 18.4 mL/min/1.73 m²) or after 12 months (38.9 ± 19.3 vs 48.6 ± 20.4 mL/min/1.73 m², P < .001, resp.). During DGF, 12.4% developed BANFF II and 18.0% BANFF I rejection, 20.2% had signs of transplant glomerulitis (first biopsy), and 16.2% (n = 18) remained on dialysis.ConclusionDGF affects 1 out of 5 kidney transplants from deceased donors. Minimizing modifiable risk factors, in particular immunologic risk, may ameliorate the incidence and outcome of DGF. The outcome of DGF depends mainly on the diagnosis of any rejection and worsens upon detection of transplant glomerulitis and pronounced interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA).     

CADI, Canti, Cavi

This counter view of protocol biopsy suggests that the widespread clinical use of this technique may be questionable. It may remain primarily a valuable research tool. Cost and risk remain as major issues. Be it screening by routine computed tomography scan for apparently normal people or routine biopsy of normal functioning kidneys there is always the risk that more harm than good might be done. The proof of benefit should be strong (scientifically strong), which requires confirmation and reproducibility of controlled trials. Patients need to know how protocol biopsy is to be used (research, management or both) and the strength of the scientific evidence concerning benefit in long-term management.     

Prostate biopsy following a positive screen in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial

PURPOSE: The benefit of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) screening for prostate cancer is under evaluation in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Followup of positive screens in PLCO is done by subject personal physicians and it is outside of trial control. We describe the pattern of prostate biopsy in men with positive screens in PLCO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined all men with positive baseline PSA or DRE screens and men with positive post-baseline screens occurring by December 2000. RESULTS: Of 2,717 men with positive PSA (greater than 4 ng/ml) at baseline 41% and 64% underwent biopsy within 1 and 3 years, respectively. A screening PSA of 7 to 10 and greater than 10 ng/ml at baseline was associated with significantly higher biopsy rates (HR 1.9 and 2.6, respectively) compared to PSA 4 to 7 ng/ml. The 1,793 in men whom the first positive PSA was after baseline had a lower overall biopsy rate (50% within 3 years). Furthermore, PSA above 7 ng/ml were not associated with higher biopsy rates in this group. The 4,449 men with positive DRE screens and negative PSA had a 3-year biopsy rate of 27%. Men with positive DRE at diagnostic followup had a biopsy rate of around 90%. However, few men, even of those with positive DRE screens, had positive diagnostic DREs. CONCLUSIONS:: These biopsy rates following positive PSA and DRE screens are likely to be representative of national rates. These results suggest that PLCO is evaluating the effects of screening in a contemporary and robust manner.     

A prospective randomized comparison of extensive prostate biopsy to standard biopsy with assessment of diagnostic yield, biopsy pain and morbidity

In a prospective randomized study, we compare standard prostate biopsy to extensive biopsy utilizing intravenous conscious sedation (IVCS). Initial biopsy patients (n=197) were randomized to either standard biopsy using intrarectal lidocaine gel (6-12 biopsies, mean 10.1) or extensive biopsy (24 biopsies) using IVCS. Cancer detection and urinary symptoms were no different between groups. However, biopsy pain was rated significantly lower and satisfaction significantly higher in the extensive biopsy group. Temporary urinary retention occurred in 4% of the extensive biopsy group. Extended biopsy with 24 samples does not improve cancer detection compared to standard biopsy when 10 cores are obtained. Extensive biopsy is very well tolerated and associated with less pain and more satisfaction than standard biopsy.     

Patient-perceived cosmesis and satisfaction after breast biopsy: comparison of stereotactic incisional,excisional, and wire-localized biopsy techniques

BACKGROUND: Several options exist for obtaining tissue for pathologic diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions. They are generally divided into traditional, open wire-localized biopsy through a 3- to 5-cm incision, stereotactic-guided excisional biopsy through a 1- to 2.5-cm incision, and stereotactic-guided incisional biopsy through a puncture wound a few millimeters long. Because all 3 techniques are reliable, cosmesis has been suggested to be a critical issue driving procedure choice. However, no study has surveyed breast biopsy patients themselves as to the importance of this issue. METHODS: We conducted telephone interviews with 59 women who underwent wire-localized biopsy (WL), stereotactic incisional biopsy with the Mammotome device (Mammo), or stereotactic excisional biopsy with the ABBI device (ABBI). All patients had benign diagnoses, were at least 2 years after procedure, and were matched to age and race. The questions were (1) How would you rate your scar? (2) Were you satisfied or dissatisfied with your biopsy experience? (3) Which is more important to you-complete removal of the abnormality or scar appearance? (4) Do you have any additional comments? RESULTS: Eighty percent of patients ranked complete removal of the abnormality more important than cosmesis. Ninety-five percent of the ABBI and Mammo patients rated their scar as excellent, whereas only 25% of WL did (P =.02). Ninety percent of WL patients, 80% of Mammo patients, and 75% of ABBI patients were satisfied with their experience (P = not significant). Many of the reasons for dissatisfaction were related to service quality rather than medical quality. CONCLUSIONS: Complete removal of the mammographic abnormality may be the priority for patients undergoing breast biopsy. There did not seem to be patient-perceived difference in cosmetic result between the Mammo and ABBI patients. Patient satisfaction is multifactorial, and attention must be paid to these issues generally ignored by physicians.     

Preoperative parameters, including percent of positive biopsy cores, in predicting pathological findings after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether preoperative parameters predict pathological stage at radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied a total of 160 men with clinically localized prostatic cancer (less than or equal to clinical T2) who underwent radical rertropubic prostatectomy at Wakayama Medical University. Clinical Ts patients are not included in this study. Preoperative parameters include patient age, Body Mass Index, preoperative serum PSA value, biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage, the percent of positive biopsy cores (%PosBx) and the percent of positive biopsy cores on the dominant side (%DomPosBx). Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to examine the prognostic significance of these preoperative parameters. Significant independent factors were combined to create a table to predict pathologically organ confined disease. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed preoperative serum PSA value (p< 0.001), biopsy Gleason score (p =0.001), clinical stage (p = 0.026), %PosBx (p= 0.002) and %DomPosBx (p=0.003) were significantly related to the pathological stage. On multivariate analysis, serum PSA value (p< 0.01), biopsy Gleason score (p<0.05) and %DomPosBx (p<0.05) were significant independent predictors of pathological stage. CONCLUSION: We provide two model combinations using preoperative clinical factors, one is a combination of serum PSA and biopsy Gleason score and the other is a combination of serum PSA and %DomPosBx, which define a new preoperative model for predicting pathological organ confined prostatic cancer. These combinations are useful and provide important information for urologists to determine the appropriate treatment strategy for clinically localized prostatic cancer.     

A Comparison of Accuracy Rates Between Open Biopsy, Cutting-Needle Biopsy, and Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of the Breast: A 3-Year Experience

Abstract: The diagnostic accuracy of excisional biopsy is used as the “gold standard” for the diagnosis of breast nodules. In comparison studies involving the diagnostic accuracies of fine-needle aspiration cytology and cutting needle biopsy, the accuracy rate of open biopsy is often assumed to be 100%. While diagnostic accuracy rates are well reported for fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and large-gauge core needle biopsy, little data has been published documenting the accuracy of excisional biopsy. Hence, valid comparisons of relative diagnostic precision between the techniques are difficult to achieve. We report our experience with the sensitivity and specificity of open biopsy, cutting-needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration biopsy over a three-year period. Between January 1992 and December 1994, histologic specimens from 412 open breast biopsies, and 17 non image guided Tru-cut® biopsies of palpable breast nodules were reviewed. These cases had either histologic follow-up (n= 388) or at least 2 years clinical follow-up (n= 25). Similarly, 450 FNAs were performed of which 215 had histologic study or cytologic follow-up. Within the 388 open biopsies with histologic follow-up, two false-negatives (sensitivity 99%) and one false-positive (specificity 99.5%) were detected based on subsequent biopsies or review of the initial material. No erroneous diagnoses were found in the 25 patients having only clinical follow-up. Among the 17 cutting needle-biopsies, two false-negatives (sensitivity 85%) were detected; no false-positives occurred (specificity 100%). One false-positive and five false-negatives were detected on follow-up of the 215 FNAs. This yielded a sensitivity of 96.2% and a specificity of 99.6%. Fine-needle aspiration compares favorably with both of these techniques, being inferior to open biopsy but of greater accuracy than cutting needle biopsy. These results demonstrate that care must be taken in using the histopathologic findings of open biopsy as the standard with which other methods of diagnosis are compared.     

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging with Lymphoscintigraphy for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma: Increasing the Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Rate

Annals of Surgical Oncology - The goal of this study was to analyze patients who underwent a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma with the combination of radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy...     

USEFULNESS OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION, SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, TRANSRECTAL ULTRAS ONOGRAPHY AND SYSTEMATIC PROSTATE BIOPSY FOR THE DETECTION OF ORGAN-CONFINED PROSTATE CANCER

The detection rate of organ-confined prostate cancer by digital rectal examination (DRE), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) of the prostate, as well as the value of a directed, guided transrectal core biopsy for the prostate (TRUS-guided biopsy) combined with systematic biopsy, were evaluated. The subjects were 171 patients with urinary symptoms suggestive of prostatic disease excluding those with clinical stage C and D prostate cancer. Twenty-five patients (14.6%) had prostate cancer, 127 (74.2%) had benign prostate hypertrophy, four (2.3%) had prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, eleven (6.4%) had inflammation, and four (2.3%) had normal prostate tissue. The incidence of detection of hypoechoic findings by TRUS in the patients in whom nodules were detected by DRE or who had elevated serum PSA was higher than that in patients with negative diagnostic findings. In 22 of the 25 patients with prostate cancer, the cancer was detected by recognition of a hypoechoic area on TRUS. In 10 of these 22 patients, prostate cancer was also detected by systematic biopsy in isoechoic areas. Prostate cancer was detected by systematic biopsy in three patients without hypoechoic findings. The positive predictive value for patients with abnormal findings on all three tests was 64.3%, which is significantly higher than that for patients with any other combination of findings (p < 0.05). Our results indicate that the combination of DRE, serum PSA and TRUS is useful for the detection of organ-confined prostate cancer, and that TRUS and TRUS-guided prostate biopsy combined with systematic biopsy should be performed in patients with abnormal findings for both DRE and PSA. Our results also demonstrate that systematic biopsy is useful for the detention of prostate cancer from the isoechoic area visualized by TRUS.     

Commentary on “Is repeat prostate biopsy associated with a greater risk of hospitalization? Data from SEER-Medicare.” Loeb S,Carter HB,Berndt SI,Ricker W,Schaeffer EM,Department of Urology,New York University,New York,NY.: J Urol 2013; 189(3):867–70. [Epub 2012 Oct 9]. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.005.

PurposeWe recently reported an increasing risk over time of hospitalization among Medicare participants after undergoing an initial prostate biopsy. Less is known about the relative risks of repeat prostate biopsies, which are frequently performed in prostate cancer screening and in active surveillance programs. We determined whether repeat biopsies are associated with an increased risk of hospitalization compared to the initial biopsy.Materials and methodsUsing SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results)-Medicare linked data from 1991 to 2007 we identified 13,883 men who underwent a single prostate biopsy and 3,640 who had multiple biopsies. The 30-day hospitalization rates were compared between these groups, and with a randomly selected control population of 134,977. ICD-9 codes were then used to examine the frequency of serious infectious and noninfectious urological complications as the primary diagnosis for hospital admissions.ResultsInitial and repeat biopsies were associated with a significantly increased risk of hospitalization within a 30-day period compared to randomly selected controls (p<0.0001). However, the repeat biopsy session was not associated with a greater risk of infectious (OR 0.81, 95% 0.49-1.32, p = 0.39) or serious noninfectious urological complications (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.54-1.62, p = 0.82) compared to the initial biopsy.ConclusionsEach biopsy was associated with a significant risk of complications compared to randomly selected controls. However, the repeat biopsy procedure itself was not associated with a greater risk of serious complications requiring hospital admission compared to the initial biopsy.     

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Review of Technology,Techniques, and Outcomes

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided (12–14 core) systematic biopsy of the prostate is the recommended standard for patients with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa). Advances in imaging have led to the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of PCa with subsequent development of software-based co-registration allowing for the integration of MRI with real-time TRUS during prostate biopsy. A number of fusion-guided methods and platforms are now commercially available with common elements in image and analysis and planning. Implementation of fusion-guided prostate biopsy has now been proven to improve the detection of clinically significant PCa in appropriately selected patients.     

Lidocaine-prilocaine administration during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: As many as 96% of patients report some kind of discomfort/pain during transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy, and when pain is severe, it may be necessary to decrease the planned number of biopsies or interrupt the procedure. Various modalities have been recommended to alleviate the pain, but reports on efficacy are contradictory. We assessed the possible benefit of intrarectal and perianal lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 98 patients without active anal and prostatic conditions underwent TRUS and, 10 to 31 days later, TRUS-guided biopsy. They were asked to grade their discomfort/pain using a 10- point linear visual analog pain scale (VAS). After TRUS, patients were divided into three groups on the basis of the VAS scores. Group 1 (N = 8) had pain scores or=5 (severe pain/discomfort). Each group was then randomized to receive local anesthesia with intrarectal and anal EMLA cream (subgroup A) or intrarectal and anal ultrasound gel as placebo (subgroup B). Pain scoring was repeated after the biopsy. RESULTS: In group 1, there were no significant differences in pain scores between subgroups A and B. In group 2, we could not complete the biopsy in one patient of subgroup B. A statistically significant difference was noticed between the VAS scores of subgroup A and subgroup B (P < 0.0001). In group 3, we were not able to complete biopsy in 5 patients of subgroup B. We noticed significantly higher VAS scores in subgroup B between TRUS and prostate biopsy (P < 0.0001), whereas similar scores were observed in subgroup A (P = NS). A statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001) was noticed between subgroup A and subgroup B scores during biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with high tolerance for simple TRUS, needle trauma does not significantly alter tolerability, and anesthetic provides little benefit for prostatic biopsy. However, the opposite is true in patients presenting moderate to significant pain/discomfort at TRUS, who may benefit from intrarectal/anal administration of EMLA during prostate biopsy.