Changes in the syndesmotic reduction after syndesmotic screw fixation for ankle malleolar fractures: One-year longitudinal evaluations using computer tomography

IntroductionTo evaluate time-dependent changes in the syndesmotic reduction after syndesmotic screw fixation and one year after screw removal for ankle malleolar fractures, and to assess whether the incidence of syndesmotic malreduction changes depending on the measurement method.MethodsWe assessed twenty patients who underwent syndesmotic screw fixation for ankle fractures. The syndesmotic screws were removed after six weeks of the fracture surgery. Syndesmotic reduction was assessed within two weeks of the fracture surgery and one year after the screw removal using the axial computer tomographic images. Side-to-side differences in the anterior and posterior tibiofibular distances, anteroposterior fibular translation, and fibular rotation were measured.ResultsThe mean anterior tibiofibular distance was 0.7 mm after syndesmotic fixation. It increased to 1.9 mm at one year after screw removal (p = 0.002). After syndesmotic fixation, four ankles had malreduction of the anterior tibiofibular distance, including three ankles with widening and one with overtightening. At one year, eight ankles had malreduction, all of whom had widening. The other measurement values did not change over time (0.1 mm vs. 0.6 mm for the posterior tibiofibular distance, 0.2 mm vs. 0.3 mm for the anteroposterior fibular translation, and 0.7 ° vs. 0 ° for the fibular rotation). The incidences of malreduction were significantly different depending on the definition of malreduction, ranging from 10% to 50% after syndesmotic fixation (p = 0.01) and from 20% to 60% at one year after screw removal (p = 0.02).ConclusionsThe anterior tibiofibular distance widened after one year of syndesmotic screw removal. The incidence of malreduction varied depending on the measurement method.     

Motion of the fibula relative to the tibia and its alterations with syndesmosis screws: A cadaver study

BackgroundThe motion of the fibula in relation to the tibia is coupled on the motion of the talus in the ankle joint. Several authors investigated this motion with different methods. An injury of the elastic fixation of the fibula to the tibia and its treatment with the syndesmotic set screw has an impact on this motion.MethodsThe motion of the fibula relative to the tibia was measured in eight embalmed human above the knee amputated cadaver specimens using a 3D-motion analysis system. The relative motion was measured from 50° of plantar flexion to 30° of dorsiflexion. Experiments were performed in the following conditions: without fixation and intact ligaments, after sectioning of the four syndesmotic ligaments and the interosseous membrane, and application of either a tricortical screw, or a quadricortical screw or two quadricortical screws.ResultsConcordant movements of the lateral malleolus were a medial translation during plantar flexion, external rotation around the sagittal axis during plantar and dorsiflexion. The motion of the proximal fibula was smaller and more variable than in the distal part. After sectioning of the syndesmosis the range of motion, compared to the intact state increased, particularly in translation along the transversal (118%), sagittal (160%) and the longitudinal (136%) axis and in axial rotation (145%). Syndesmotic screws reduced the range of motion in transversal (p < 0.006) and sagittal translation (p < 0.011) and axial rotation.ConclusionThe small relative motion of the tibia and fibula is increased by syndesmotic injuries. Syndesmosis screws significantly limit this increased relative motion below physiologic values, which makes it necessary to remove the screws before flexion in the ankle joint is performed.     

Arthroscopically measured syndesmotic stability after screw vs. suture button fixation in a cadaveric model

BackgroundAppropriate management of ankle syndesmotic instability is needed to prevent the development of complications. Previous biomechanical studies have evaluated movement of the fibula after screw or suture button fixations with different results, most likely being caused by variations in experimental setups that did not mirror the in vivo clinical setting. This study aimed to arthroscopically compare in a cadaveric model the stability of syndesmotic fixation with either a suture button or syndesmotic screw.MethodsEight fresh matched pairs of human ankle cadaver specimens (above knee) underwent arthroscopic assessment with (1) intact ligaments, (2) after complete disruption, and (3) after repair with either a quadracortical syndesmotic screw or suture button construct. In every stage, four loading conditions were considered under 100N of direct force: 1) unstressed, 2) lateral hook test, 3) anterior to posterior (AP) translation test, and 4) posterior to anterior (PA) translation test. Coronal plane tibiofibular diastasis, as well as sagittal plane tibiofibular translation, were arthroscopically measured.ResultsCoronal plane anterior and posterior tibiofibular diastasis and sagittal plane tibiofibular translation were measured using probes of increasing diameters. Following screw fixation, syndesmotic stability was similar to the uninjured syndesmosis in the coronal plane (anterior, median 0.0 mm [IQR 0.0–0.3] vs. 0.3 mm [IQR 0.2–0.3]; p = 0.57; posterior, median 0.1 mm [IQR 0.0–0.4] vs. 0.2 mm [IQR 0.1–0.3]; p = 1.0) but more rigid in the sagittal plane (median 0.0 mm [IQR 0.0–0.1] vs. 1.0 mm [IQR 0.4–1.5]; p = 0.012). Repairing the unstable syndesmosis with a suture button construct resulted in coronal plane stability similar to the uninjured syndesmosis (anterior, median 0.2 mm [IQR 0.1–0.3] vs. 0.2 mm [IQR 0.1–0.3]; p = 0.48; posterior, median 0.2 mm [IQR 0.1–0.3] vs. 0.3 mm [IQR 0.1–0.5]; p = 0.44). However, sagittal plane fibular motion remained unstable as compared to the uninjured syndesmosis (median 2.2 mm [IQR 1.6–2.6] vs. 0.8 mm [IQR 0.4–1.3]; p = 0.012).ConclusionCurrent fixation methods for syndesmotic disruption maintain coronal plane fibular stability. Screw and suture button constructs, however, respectively resulted in greater or insufficient constraint to fibular motion in the sagittal plane as compared to the intact syndesmotic ligament. These findings suggest that neither traditional screw nor suture button fixations optimally stabilize the syndesmosis, which may have implications for postoperative care and clinical outcomes.     

Overtightening of the syndesmosis revisited and the effect of syndesmotic malreduction on ankle dorsiflexion

BackgroundAnkle syndesmotic injuries are a significant source of morbidity and require anatomic reduction to optimize outcomes. Although a previous study concluded that maximal dorsiflexion during syndesmotic fixation was not required, methodologic weaknesses existed and several studies have demonstrated improved ankle dorsiflexion after removal of syndesmotic screws.The purposes of the current investigation are: (1) To assess the effect of compressive syndesmotic screw fixation on ankle dorsiflexion utilizing a controlled load and instrumentation allowing for precise measurement of motion. (2) To assess the effect of anterior & posterior syndesmotic malreduction after compressive syndesmotic screw fixation on ankle dorsiflexion.Material and methodsFifteen lower limb cadaveric leg specimens were utilized for the study. Ankle dorsiflexion was measured utilizing a precise micro-sensor system after application of a consistent load in the (1) intact state, (2) after compression fixation with a syndesmotic screw and (3) after anterior & (4) posterior malreduction of the syndesmosis.ResultsFollowing screw compression of the nondisplaced syndesmosis, dorsiflexion ROM was 99.7 ± 0.87% (mean ± standard error) of baseline ankle ROM. Anterior and posterior malreduction of the syndesmosis resulted in dorsiflexion ROM that was 99.1 ± 1.75% and 98.6 ± 1.56% of baseline ankle ROM, respectively. One-way ANOVA was performed showing no statistical significance between groups (p-value = 0.88).Two-way ANOVA comparing the groups with respect to both the reduction condition (intact, anatomic reduction, anterior displacement, posterior displacement) and the displacement order (anterior first, posterior first) did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect (p-value = 0.99).ConclusionMaximal dorsiflexion of the ankle is not required prior to syndesmotic fixation as no loss of motion was seen with compressive fixation in our cadaver model. Anterior or posterior syndesmotic malreduction following syndesmotic screw fixation had no effect on ankle dorsiflexion. Poor patient outcomes after syndesmotic malreduction may be due to other factors and not loss of dorsiflexion motion.Level of Evidence: IV     

Ideal angle of syndesmotic screw fixation: A CT-based cross-sectional image analysis study

Without clear reference, the precision of syndesmotic screw placement cannot be guaranteed and malposition of these screws leads to poor results. Therefore, to prevent malpositioning of syndesmotic screws, an improved understanding of the orientation of tibiofibular syndesmosis is essential. We analyzed cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) scans of the foot and ankle to identify precise screw positions for the treatment of syndesmotic injuries. A total of 134 calcaneal fractures with intact tibiofibular syndesmosis were enrolled in this retrospective study. We measured the angle between the perpendicular line of the second proximal phalanx and the line start apex of the lateral cortex of the fibula bisecting the tibial incisura and crossing the center of the tibia in neutral ankle joints, with the second toe positioned anteriorly using a short leg splint. The second toe was used as the reference for clarity and applicability. The ideal angle of syndesmotic screw placement in cross-sectional CT images was 18.8 ± 5.6° (mean ± standard deviation) and did not differ according to independent variables (P > 0.05). In neutral ankle joints with the second toe positioned anteriorly, the ideal angle of syndesmotic screw placement is 18.8°, which is less than that currently in used in conventional methods.     

Malleolar tips as reference points for positioning of syndesmotic screw: A preliminary CT based analysis

PurposeThe risk of malpositioning of the syndesmotic screws is very high. A lack of standard radiological or physical references for accurate syndesmotic screw placement is a potential contributing factor in syndesmotic screw malpositioning. Malleolar tips are clinically as well as radiologically appreciable bony references. The purpose of this preliminary CT based study was to investigate the axial relations of the central syndesmotic axis with the malleolar tips.MethodsCT based studies of uninjured adult ankle joints with intact syndesmosis, conducted over a six months period were analysed. The axial differences between the coronal plane along the malleolar tips and that along the central syndesmotic axis in the axial plane were measured. Gender-based variations were also analyzed.ResultsA total of 70 CT studies were analyzed, and the axial difference between the malleolar tips based coronal plane and that along the central syndesmotic axis was observed to be 3.70 ± 5.61°. The male and female measurements were comparable.ConclusionBeing in a static relation to the syndesmosis independent of the foot position and the limb rotation, the malleolar tips can be reliably used as references for directing syndesmotic screw in the axial plane. A knowledge of this axial difference between malleolar tips and central syndesmotic axis can help surgeons in an accurate syndesmotic screw placement.     

Ankle joint contact loads and displacement in syndesmosis injuries repaired with Tightropes compared to screw fixation in a static model

BackgroundThe effect of syndesmotic fixation on restoration of pressure mechanics in the setting of a syndesmotic injury is largely unknown. The purpose of this study is to examine the contact mechanics of the tibiotalar joint following syndesmosis fixation with screws versus a flexible fixation device for complete syndesmotic injury.MethodsSix matched pairs of cadaveric below knee specimens were dissected and motion capture trackers were fixed to the tibia, fibula, and talus and a pressure sensor was placed in the tibiotalar joint. Each specimen was first tested intact with axial compressive load followed by external rotation while maintaining axial compression. Next, syndesmotic ligaments were sectioned and randomly assigned to repair with either two TightRopes® or two 3.5 mm cortical screws and the protocol was repeated. Mean contact pressure, peak pressure, reduction in contact area, translation of the center of pressure, and relative talar and fibular motion were calculated. Specimens were then cyclically loaded in external rotation and surviving specimens were loaded in external rotation to failure.ResultsNo differences in pressure measurements were observed between the intact and instrumented states during axial load. Mean contact presure relative to intact testing was increased in the screw group at 5 Nm and 7.5 Nm torque. Likewise, peak pressure was increased in the TightRope group at 7.5 Nm torque. There was no change in center of pressure in the TightRope group at any threshold; however, at every threshold tested there was significant medial and anterior translation in the screw group relative to the intact state.ConclusionEither screws or TightRope fixation is adequate with AL alone. With lower amounts of torque, the TightRope group appears to have contact and pressure mechanics that more closely match native mechanics.     

Fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults: Fixed-angle devices or Pauwel screws?

BackgroundWe sought to compare the incidence of complications after fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults treated with fixed-angle devices versus multiple cancellous screws and a trochanteric lag screw (Pauwel screw).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study at a level I trauma centre. Sixty-two skeletally mature patients (age range, 16–60 years) with displaced femoral neck fractures were included in the study. Forty-seven were treated with a fixed-angle device (sliding hip plate with screw or helical blade) and 15 with multiple cancellous screws placed in a Pauwel configuration. The main outcome measure was postoperative complication of osteonecrosis or nonunion treated with a surgical procedure.ResultsSignificantly fewer failures occurred in the fixed-angle group (21%) than in the screws group (60%) (p = 0.008). Osteonecrosis was rare in the fixed-angle group, occurring in 2% of cases versus 33% of cases in the screws group (p = 0.002). Consistent with previous studies, good to excellent reductions were associated with a failure rate of 25% and fair to poor reductions were associated with a failure rate of 55% (p = 0.07). The best-case scenario of a good to excellent reduction stabilised with a fixed-angle device yielded a success rate of 85%.ConclusionIn young patients with displaced high-energy femoral neck fractures, fixed-angle devices resulted in fewer treatment failures than did Pauwel screws.     

A hybrid approach to mid-shaft clavicle fixation

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to demonstrate the strength characteristics of a hybrid uni-cortical construct for clavicle fixation. The technique reported aims to combine benefits of uni-cortical fixation with stability comparable to traditional bi-cortical fixation. The approach utilises long, oblique uni-cortical screws at the distal ends of the plate acting as surrogate bi-cortical screws. Locked uni-cortical screws positioned centrally provide bending and torsion strength to the construct. This alternative hybrid uni-cortical technique does not require far cortex screw or drill penetration required in bi-cortical fixation techniques, thus avoiding potentially catastrophic vascular and or neurologic injury. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical behaviour of the hybrid uni-cortical construct to standard bi-cortical fixations under both torsion and bending loads.MethodThirty osteotomized human cadaveric clavicles were randomly allocated to three surgical fixation techniques: bi-cortical locked screw fixation, bi-cortical non-locked screw fixation and hybrid uni-cortical screw fixation. Each clavicle construct was tested non-destructively under torsional loading, and then under cantilever bending to failure. Construct bending and torsional stiffness, as well as ultimate failure strength, were measured.ResultsThere were no significant differences between uni-cortical or bi-cortical fixation constructs in either bending stiffness or ultimate bending moment (p > 0.05); however, there was a trend towards greater bending stiffness in the hybrid construct. The uni-cortical hybrid fixation technique displayed a significantly lower mean torsional stiffness value when compared with the bi-cortical locked screw fixation (mean difference: 134.4 Nmm/degrees, 95% confidence interval [32.3, 236.4], p = 0.007).ConclusionA hybrid uni-cortical approach to clavicle plate fixation that may improve screw purchase and reduce risk of intra-operative vascular damage demonstrates comparable bending strength to current bi-cortical approaches.     

Radiographic predictors of symptomatic screw removal after retrograde femoral nail insertion

IntroductionRemoval of symptomatic implants is a common procedure performed by orthopaedic trauma surgeons. No guidance is available regarding which factors contribute to the likelihood of an implant becoming symptomatic. Our objective was to determine whether radiographic parameters associated with distal interlocks in retrograde femoral nails are associated with the rate of symptomatic screw removal.Patients and methodsWe conducted a retrospective review at a Level I trauma center. Study patients (n = 442) had femoral fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nails from 2007 to 2014 and at least 1 year of follow-up. The main outcome measurement was symptomatic distal screw removal as predicted by radiographic parameters.ResultsSymptomatic screw removal occurred in 12% of the patients. Increased distance between the most distal screw and the articular surface of the femur significantly reduced likelihood of symptomatic screw removal. A cutoff of 40 mm from the articular block was predictive of removal (≥40 mm, 0% removal; <40 mm, 18% removal, p < 0.0001). In patients with distal screws placed within 40 mm of the articular surface of the femur, a ratio of screw length to distance between medial and lateral femoral cortices that was ≥1 was a strong predictor of symptomatic screw removal (area under Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, 0.75; p < 0.0001).ConclusionsMore distal screws and screws that radiographically extend to or beyond the medial cortex are more likely to cause pain and require removal in femoral fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nails. We identified a specific distance from the joint (<40 mm) and a ratio of screw length to bone width (≥1) that significantly increased the likelihood of symptomatic screw removal. Clinicians can use these data to inform patients of the likely risk of implant removal and perhaps to better guide placement and length of screws when the clinical scenario allows some flexibility in location and length of screws.     

Minimally-invasive hallux arthrodesis with endomedullary and a crossed screw fixation

BackgroundMinimally invasive surgery has several advantages: minor pain, smaller incisions and less tissue damage than traditional open surgery. Hallux arthrodesis with an endomedullary screw fixation provides compression and axial stability.The aim of this study was to describe the procedure and evaluate our first results of the minimally invasive first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis with an endomedullary screw combined with a crossed screw fixation.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 15 feet, with a minimum 1 year follow-up.Patients were evaluated with full-load radiographs and AOFAS score preoperatively and at last follow-up.ResultsConsolidation rate was 93.3%, radiological consolidation time was 18 weeks (14–60). Radiographic alignment was achieved with satisfactory results. The preoperative AOFAS score improved from a mean 49 to 90 (p = 0.001).There was one postoperative superficial site infection, which healed and a patient developed a pseudarthrosis but it was asymptomatic.ConclusionsThe minimally invasive metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis with an intramedullary screw is a secure procedure with comparable results to open techniques.Level of Clinical Evidence4. Case series.     

Biomechanical comparison of plate and screw fixation in anterior pelvic ring fractures with low bone mineral density

IntroductionOsteosynthesis of anterior pubic ramus fractures can be challenging, especially in poor bone quality. The aim of the present study was to compare plate and retrograde endomedullary screw fixation of the superior pubic ramus with low bone mineral density (BMD).Materials and methodsTwelve human cadaveric hemi-pelvises were analyzed in a matched pair study design. BMD of the specimens was 35 ± 30 mgHA/cm³, as measured in the fifth lumbar vertebra. A simulated two-fragment superior pubic ramus fracture model was fixed with either a 7.3-mm cannulated retrograde screw (Group 1) or a 10-hole 3.5-mm reconstruction plate (Group 2). Cyclic progressively increasing axial loading was applied through the acetabulum. Relative interfragmentary movements were captured using an optical motion tracking system.ResultsInitial axial construct stiffness was 424 ± 116.1 N/mm in Group 1 and 464 ± 69.7 N/mm in Group 2, with no significant difference (p = 0.345). Displacement and gap angle at the fracture site during cyclic loading were significantly higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2. Cycles to failure, based on clinically relevant criteria, were significantly lower in Group 1 (3469 ± 1837) compared to Group 2 (10,226 ± 3295) (p = 0.028). Failure mode in Group 1 was characterized by screw cutting through the cancellous bone. In Group 2 the specimens exclusively failed by plate bending.ConclusionsFrom biomechanical point of view, pubic ramus stabilization with plate osteosynthesis is superior compared to a single retrograde screw fixation in osteoporotic bone. However, the extensive surgical approach needed for plating must be considered.     

Percutaneous screw fixation of the iliosacral joint: A case-based preoperative planning approach reduces operating time and radiation exposure

IntroductionA preoperative planning approach for percutaneous screw fixation of the iliosacral joint provides specific entry points (EPs) and aiming points (APs) of intraosseous screw pathways (as defined by CT scans) for lateral fluoroscopic projections used intraoperatively. The potential to achieve the recommended EPs and APs, to obtain an ideal screw position (perpendicular to the iliosacral joint), to avoid occurrence of extraosseous screw misplacement, to reduce the operating time and the radiation exposure by utilizing this planning approach have not been described yet.MethodsOn preoperative CT scans of eight human cadaveric specimen individual EPs and APs were identified and transferred to the lateral fluoroscopic projection using a coordinate system with the zero-point in the center of the posterior cortex of the S1 vertebral body (x-axis parallel to upper S1 endplate). Distances were expressed in relation to the anteroposterior distance of the S1 upper endplate (in%). In each specimen on one side a screw was placed with provided EP and AP (New Technique) whereas at the contralateral side a screw was placed without given EP and AP (Conventional Technique). Both techniques were compared using postoperative CT scans to assess distances between predefined EPs and APs and the actually obtained EPs and APs, screw angulations in relation to the iliosacral joint in coronal and axial planes and the occurrence of any extraosseous screw misplacement. The “operating time (OT)” and the “time under fluoroscopy (TUF)” were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsEPs were realized significantly more accurate using the new technique in vertical direction. The screw positions in relation to the iliosacral joint showed no significant difference between both techniques. Both techniques had one aberrantly placed screw outside the safe corridor. The (mean ± SD) “OT” and the (mean ± SD) “TUF” were significantly decreased using the new technique compared to the conventional technique (OT: 7.6 ± 2 min versus 13.1 ± 5.8 min, p = 0.012; TUF: 1.5 ± 0.8 min versus 2.2 ± 1.1 min).ConclusionThe presented preoperative planning approach increases the accuracy in percutaneous screw fixation of the iliosacral joint, reduces operating time and minimizes radiation exposure to patient and staff.     

Finite element analysis of the effect of cannulated screw placement and drilling frequency on femoral neck fracture fixation

BackgroundPositioning of the implanted cannulated screw is paramount for stable femoral neck fracture fixation. To avoid overdrilling, the aim of this study is to determine the optimum configuration of three cannulated screws employed in femoral neck fracture fixation.MethodsUsing a CT scan from a 28 year old healthy male, several models of femoral neck fracture fixation were developed using finite element analysis. After drilling small holes (in either fixed or random patterns) for screw insertion, the mechanical stresses on the screws were compared for three fracture types.ResultsThe inverted isosceles triangle was found to be the best screw configuration. Using finite element analysis, the upper limit of drilling frequency and the maximum stress on the screws for 30°, 50°, and 70° drilling were 14, 16, and 19 times and 46.1 MPa, 61.9 MPa, and 51.0 MPa, respectively. The upper limit of drilling frequency and the maximum stress on the screws for subcapital type, transcervical type, and basicervical type were 14, 16, and 40 times and 24.7 MPa, 61.9 MPa, and 113.5 MPa, respectively.ConclusionsResults of this study had supported the use of the inverted isosceles triangle as the best screw configuration for femoral neck fracture fixation. Screw position, Pauwels angle, and drilling frequency can all affect the mechanical strength of femoral neck fracture fixation.     

A sliding hip screw augmented with 2 screws is biomechanically similar to an inverted triad of cannulated screws in repair of a Pauwels type-III fracture

ObjectivePauwels III femoral neck fractures are highly unstable. These fractures are commonly treated with three cannulated screws or sliding hip screw (SHS) implants, however high rates of non-union persist. A hybrid SHS construct has recently been proposed. The objective of the study was to compare this construct to the familiar inverted triad of cannulated screws and to a single SHS.MethodsFourth generation biomechanical femur analogs were used to create a highly repeatable injury model. The hybrid SHS construct contained a SHS with two superior cannulated screws in an inverted triangle configuration. Eight samples for each construct were biomechanically evaluated and the results compared using ANOVA (p < 0.05).ResultsThe cannulated triad and hybrid SHS provided similar stiffness and fracture gap motion. The single SHS exhibited significantly lower stiffness and larger fracture plane diastasis than either the inverted triangle of cannulated screws or hybrid SHS (p < 0.05). None of the constructs exhibited catastrophic failure during cyclic loading nor under loading up to 2.5 times body weight.ConclusionsThe single SHS provided the least stable fracture fixation, while the inverted triad and hybrid SHS constructs were mechanically similar. The fracture repair simulated here illustrates how these repairs have the potential to return near pre-fracture strength in ideal conditions with young, healthy bone. However; in clinical situations where comminution impairs load transfer through the cortices the hybrid SHS may be the most favorable option.     

Anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament anatomical repair and augmentation versus trans-syndesmosis screw fixation for the syndesmotic instability in external-rotation type ankle fracture with posterior malleolus involvement: A prospective and comparative study

PurposeSyndesmosis injury is common in external-rotation type ankle fractures (ERAF). Trans-syndesmosis screw fixation, the gold-standard treatment, is currently controversial for its complications and biomechanical disadvantages. The purpose of this study was to introduce a new method of anatomically repairing the anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) and augmentation with anchor rope system to treat the syndesmotic instability in ERAF with posterior malleolus involvement and to compare its clinical outcomes with that of trans-syndesmosis screw fixation.Methods53 ERAFs with posterior malleolus involvement received surgery, and the syndesmosis was still unstable after fracture fixation. They were randomised into screw fixation group and AITFL anatomical repair with augmentation group. Reduction quality, syndesmosis diastasis recurrence, pain (VAS score), time back to work, Olerud–Molander ankle score and range of motion (ROM) of ankle were investigated.ResultsOlerud–Molander score in AITFL repair group and screw group was 90.4 and 85.8 at 12-month follow-up (P > 0.05). Plantar flexion was 31.2° and 34.3° in repair and screw groups (P = 0.04). Mal-reduction happened in 5 cases (19.2%) in screw group while 2 cases (7.4%) in repair group. Postoperative syndesmosis re-diastasis occurred in 3 cases in screw group while zero in repair group (P > 0.05). Pain score was similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). Overall complication rate and back to work time were 26.9% and 3.7% (P = 0.04), 7.15 months and 5.26 months (P = 0.02) in screw group and repair group, respectively.ConclusionsFor syndesmotic instability in ERAF with posterior malleolus involvement, the method of AITFL anatomical repair and augmentation with anchor rope system had an equivalent functional outcome and reduction, earlier rehabilitation and less complication compared with screw fixation. It can be selected as an alternative.     

Computational analysis of the safe zone for the antegrade lag screw in posterior column fixation with the anterior approach in acetabular fracture: A cadaveric study

ObjectiveThe fluoroscopically-guided procedure of antegrade posterior lag screw in posterior column fixation through anterior approach is technique-dependent and requires an experienced surgeon. The purpose of this study was to establish the safe zone for the antegrade posterior lag screw by using computational analysis.MethodThe virtual three-dimensional model of 178 hemi-pelvises was created from the CT data (DICOM format) by using Mimics^® program, and were used to measure the safe zone of antegrade lag screw fixation on the inner table of the iliac wing, and the largest diameter of cylindrical implant inside safe zone. The central point (point A) of the cylinder was assessed and was compared with the intersection point (point B) between the linea terminalis and the anterior border of the sacroiliac articulation.ResultsThe safe zone was triangular with an average area of 670.4 mm² (range, 374.8–1084.5 mm²). The largest diameter of the cylinder was a mean 7.4 mm (range, 5.0–10.0 mm). When height was under 156.3 cm, the diameter of the cylindrical implant was smaller than 7.0 mm (p < 0.001, regression coefficient = 0.09). The linear distance between points A and B was 32.5 mm (range, 19.2–49.3 mm). Point A was far enough away from the well-positioned anterior column plate to prevent collision between the two.ConclusionThe safe zone was shaped like a triangle, and was large enough for multiple screws. Considering the straight-line distance between points A and B, the central screw can be fixed without overlapping with the well-positioned anterior column plate at the point between holes 2 and 3.     

Fixation of quadrilateral plate fractures of the acetabulum using the buttress screw: A novel technique

IntroductionQuadrilateral plate fractures constitute one of the most challenging components of acetabular fractures. The objective of this study is to describe and evaluate the novel technique of buttress screw fixation of the quadrilateral plate component of the acetabular fractures.Patients & methodsForty cases of acetabular fracture with associated quadrilateral plate component were included in the study. Mean age was 35 years (range, 16 − 68 years), with a mean follow-up 16.4 months (range, 9 − 36 months). Fixation of the quadrilateral plate was achieved by one or more buttress screws. The screws were inserted through the reconstruction plate, and placed close to the edge of the pelvic brim. To effectively achieve the 3-point fixation principle, the screw was inserted through the plate hole then outside the bone rubbing on the pelvic surface of the quadrilateral plate.ResultsAnatomical reduction of the quadrilateral plate component of the fractures was achieved in all but one patient. The modified Merle D’Aubigné and Postel score was excellent in 13 cases, good in 23 cases, fair in three cases, and poor in one case. No screw displacement or failures were observed during follow-up evaluation. No major complications related to this technique were observed in this series.ConclusionButtress screw fixation of the quadrilateral plate fracture component in associated acetabular fractures is a safe and effective technique for reduction and fixation of these challenging fractures with no major complications related to this novel technique.     

Biomechanical Analysis of Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury Fixation Methods: A Finite Element Analysis

The optimal treatment strategy after syndesmotic injuries is still controversial. In our study, we aimed to evaluate ideal fixation method in syndesmotic injury by using finite element analysis method. A 3D SolidWorks model file was created by taking computed tomography (CT) images of the area from the right foot base to the knee joint level of a healthy adult male. The intact model, injury model, and 8 different fixation models were created that 3.5 mm screw and suture-button were used in. The models were compared in terms of lateral fibular translation, posterior fibular translation and external rotation of fibula compared to tibia and stress values occurred on screws and suture-buttons. In the hybrid-1 model, lateral fibular translation and external fibular rotation values were obtained as close to the intact model. Von Mises stresses occurred in the screw (435.7 MPa) and suture-button (424.7 MPa) that used in hybrid-1 model was more than single screw at 4 cm model (316.8 MPa) and single suture-button at 2 cm model (160.7 MPa). In the Hybrid-1 model, the screw compensates for posterior fibular translation and external fibular rotation, while the suture-button compensates for lateral fibular translation. Also, the effect of the distal suture-button preventing diastasis in case of proximal screw failure, it was concluded that the hybrid-1 model can be used as a good treatment alternative in the surgical treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries.     

Characteristics of immediate and fatigue strength of a dual-threaded pedicle screw in cadaveric spines

Background contextNovel dual-threaded screws are configured with overlapping (doubled) threads only in the proximal shaft to improve proximal cortical fixation.PurposeTests were run to determine whether dual-threaded pedicle screws improve pullout resistance and increase fatigue endurance compared with standard pedicle screws.Study design/settingIn vitro strength and fatigue tests were performed in human cadaveric vertebrae and in polyurethane foam test blocks.Patient sampleSeventeen cadaveric lumbar vertebrae (14 pedicles) and 40 test sites in foam blocks were tested.Outcome measuresMeasures for comparison between standard and dual-threaded screws were bone mineral density (BMD), screw insertion torque, ultimate pullout force, peak load at cyclic failure, and pedicular side of first cyclic failure.MethodsFor each vertebral sample, dual-threaded screws were inserted in one pedicle and single-threaded screws were inserted in the opposite pedicle while recording insertion torque. In seven vertebrae, axial pullout tests were performed. In 10 vertebrae, orthogonal loads were cycled at increasing peak values until toggle exceeded threshold for failure. Insertion torque and pullout force were also recorded for screws placed in foam blocks representing healthy or osteoporotic bone porosity.ResultsIn bone, screw insertion torque was 183% greater with dual-threaded than with standard screws (p<.001). Standard screws pulled out at 93% of the force required to pull out dual-threaded screws (p=.42). Of 10 screws, five reached toggle failure first on the standard screw side, two screws failed first on the dual-threaded side, and three screws failed on both sides during the same round of cycling. In the high-porosity foam, screw insertion torque was 60% greater with the dual-threaded screw than with the standard screw (p=.005), but 14% less with the low-porosity foam (p=.07). Pullout force was 19% less with the dual-threaded screw than with the standard screw in the high-porosity foam (p=.115), but 6% greater with the dual-threaded screw in the low-porosity foam (p=.156).ConclusionsAlthough dual-threaded screws required higher insertion torque than standard screws in bone and low density foam, dual-threaded and standard pedicle screws exhibited equivalent axial pullout and cyclic fatigue endurance. Unlike single-threaded screws, the mechanical performance of dual-threaded screws in bone was relatively independent of BMD. In foam, the mechanical performance of both types of screws was highly dependent on porosity.