桡骨小头骨折的治疗方法探讨

目的 探讨桡骨小头骨折的治疗方法及临床疗效.方法 回顾分析选择62例桡骨小头骨折病例,其中保守治疗24例;切开复位内固定28例;桡骨小头切除7例,桡骨小头假体置换3例.结果 随访6～36个月,按照Broberg-Morrey 肘关节功能评分评估肘关节预后,保守治疗优良率87.5％;切开复位内固定优良率85.7％;桡骨小头切除优良率71.4％;桡骨小头置换优良率100％.结论 对不同分型的病例选折合适的治疗方法,Mason Ⅰ型适用保守治疗;Mason Ⅱ型、Mason Ⅲ型,部分Mason Ⅳ型适用切开复位内固定;部分MasonⅣ型适用桡骨小头切除或桡骨小头假体置换.     

手术与非手术治疗MasonⅡ型桡骨小头骨折疗效分析

目的比较研究手术与非手术治疗MasonⅡ型桡骨小头骨折的疗效,为临床治疗该类骨折方式的选择提供参考。方法对55例MasonⅡ型桡骨小头骨折进行治疗回顾,其中28例手术内固定治疗,27例非手术治疗。按照Broberg和Morrey的评定标准对两组肘关节进行功能评分“。。结果全部病例获得随访,其中手术组28例,非手术组27例;随访时间15～46个月．平均23个月。肘关节功能评分：手术组平均为91．2分,极好15例,好11例,一般2例,优良率为92．9％。非手术组平均为82．5分．极好10例．好11例,一般6例,优良率为77．8％。手术治疗组明显优于非手术治疗组（P〈0．01）。结论手术治疗MasonⅡ型桡骨小头骨折在关节活动、肌力和功能恢复方面较非手术治疗有明显优势．建议对此类患者尽量选择手术治疗。     

Bold螺钉治疗MasonⅡ型桡骨小头骨折

目的探讨Bold螺钉内固定治疗Mason型桡骨小头骨折的临床疗效。方法自2006年5月至2009年6月,采用Bold螺钉内固定治疗Mason型桡骨小头骨折13例,男8例,女5例,年龄19～56岁,平均37.3岁。术后2d进行功能锻炼。术后定期X线复查,采用Broberg和Morrey肘关节功能评分标准评判疗效。结果所有患者均获得6～14个月随访,平均10个月。肘关节功能评分平均97分,优9例,良3例,差1例,优良率为92.3%。结论 Bold螺钉内固定治疗Mason型桡骨小头骨折,能精确重建关节面,早期功能锻炼,有助于恢复良好的肘关节功能,是一种治疗桡骨小头骨折的理想方法。     

昼屈夜伸制动肘关节治疗桡骨头MasonⅠ型和部分MasonⅡ型骨折的临床疗效

目的探讨应用昼屈夜伸制动肘关节治疗桡骨头MasonⅠ型和部分MasonⅡ型骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析采用昼屈夜伸制动肘关节治疗桡骨头MasonⅠ型和部分MasonⅡ型骨折37例的情况。结果所有患者随访平均16周,11例肘关节活动时有轻度疼痛症状,所有患者运动弧度超过100°,按照Bruberg和Morrey肘关节功能评分标准进行评分,平均90分,优22例,良15例,优良率100%。结论采用昼屈夜伸制动肘关节治疗桡骨头MasonⅠ型和部分MasonⅡ型骨折,肘关节功能恢复良好。     

微型螺钉治疗桡骨小头骨折

目的探讨应用微型螺钉治疗MasonⅡ型及部分MasonⅢ型桡骨小头骨折的疗效。方法采用切开复位微型空心螺钉固定治疗11例成人桡骨小头粉碎性骨折,术后早期进行肘关节功能锻炼,定期随访患者肘关节X线片,观察肘关节屈伸及前臂的旋转活动度。结果随访6～24个月,平均12．6个月。术后X线片示解剖复位8例,3例关节面塌陷小于2mm。术后1年肘关节功能根据Metaizeau疗效评定标准,优7例,良3例,差1例,优良率90．9％。结论对于MasonⅡ型及部分MasonⅢ型桡骨小头骨折采用切开复位,微型空心螺钉固定治疗,患者能早期进行功能锻炼,并获得良好疗效。     

微型钢板治疗Mason Ⅲ型桡骨小头骨折

目的评价微型钢板治疗MasonⅢ型桡骨小头骨折的临床效果。方法对10例MasonⅢ型骨折进行微型钢板内固定，根据患者肘关节活动疼痛、稳定性和肌力情况，依照Broberg和Morrey肘关节评分标准进行功能评价。结果10例患者随访12-24个月，平均20个月，肘关节平均评分58分（30～90）分，其中优1例，良4例，差5例，优良率50％。结论切开复位微型钢板内固定治疗复杂的MasonⅢ型桡骨小头骨折，不能取得良好的临床效果，如果要获得较好的肘关节活动和早期康复，可考虑桡骨小头切除或置换。     

可吸收螺钉治疗MasonⅡ型及部分Mason Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折

目的 探讨应用可吸收螺钉治疗Mason Ⅱ型及部分MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折的疗效. 方法 自1999年1月至2006年5月共收治桡骨头骨折患者36例,其中18例采用切开复位.2.0 am或2.7 mm可吸收螺钉固定,术后早期进行肘关节的屈伸及前臂的旋转活动,定期随访患肘正、侧位X线片,观察肘关节屈伸及前臂的旋转活动度.按照Mayo评分评估患者肘关节功能.结果 18例患者均获得6～24个月随访,平均随访8.3个月.18例骨折均获Ⅰ期愈合,平均愈合时间10周,肘关节屈伸活动范围平均109°,前臂旋转活动范围平均92°,Mayo评分优良率为88.8%(16/18). 结论 对于Mason Ⅱ型及部分Mason Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折的患者采用切开复位,可吸收螺钉固定治疗,无需二次手术取出内固定,患者能早期进行功能锻炼,并获得良好疗效.     

可吸收棒内固定治疗MasonⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨小头骨折

目的探讨可吸收棒内固定治疗MasonⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨小头骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析我科自2012年1月到2014年8月收治的21例分型为MasonⅡ、Ⅲ型的桡骨小头骨折患者,其中男11例,女10例;年龄12~26岁,平均16岁。所有的患者均采用可吸收棒内固定骨折块,术后患肢前臂中立位,屈肘90°位石膏托固定3周,石膏拆除后行患肢功能锻炼,术后复查肘关节X线了解复位情况并采用Broberg和Morrey评分评估功能情况。结果 21例病例均获得随访,随访时间12~24个月,平均18个月。骨折均愈合,愈合时间平均3个月。按Broberg和Morrey评分评价肘关节功能,优13例,良6例,一般2例,优良率90.48%。术后无一例患者出现相关并发症。结论可吸收棒内固定治疗MasonⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨小头骨折操作简单、损伤小,固定牢固,无需二次手术取出,疗效确切,值得推广。     

石膏外固定或手术治疗桡骨头骨折43例

目的探讨桡骨头骨折多种治疗方法的效果、优缺点。方法对江苏邳州市铁二局医院自2006年6月至2012年3月采用多种方法治疗桡骨头骨折43例患者资料进行回顾性分析,其中男性28例,女性15例;年龄3~67岁,平均25岁。MasonⅠ型14例采用石膏外固定,Ⅱ~Ⅳ型29例,均采用手术治疗。结果本组均获随访,随访时间4~24个月,平均7个月。仅有1例骨折未愈合。HSS2肘关节功能评分最低84分,最高100分,平均96.87。结论桡骨头骨折MasonⅠ型采用石膏外固定疗效确切,MasonⅡ型手术内固定是有效可靠的治疗方法。MasonⅢⅣ型的骨折,不能达到坚强内固定并行早期功能锻炼的病例,采用维持内固定＋短期石膏外固定也能取得很好的治疗效果。     

Herbert螺钉治疗MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折疗效分析

目的 比较采用Herbert螺钉手术与非手术治疗MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折的疗效,为临床治疗该类骨折方式的选择提供参考.方法 对26例MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折的治疗情况进行回顾分析,其中15例采用手术内固定治疗,11例采用非手术治疗.结果 本组获得随访15～46个月,肘关节功能评分:手术组平均93.3分,极好9例,好4例,一般2例,优良率为86.7％.非手术组平均81.5分,极好3例,好4例,一般4例,优良率63.6％.手术组明显优于非手术治疗组(P＜0.01).结论 运用Herbert螺钉手术治疗MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折在关节活动、肌力和功能恢复方面较非手术治疗有明显优势,建议首选手术治疗.     

Mason type II radial head fractures: operative versus nonoperative treatment.

The most appropriate treatment of Mason type II radial head fractures remains controversial. Recommended treatment has included closed reduction and immobilization, resection, or open reduction and internal fixation. The cases of 29 Mason type II radial head fractures treated at Naval Hospital Oakland from 1983 to 1989 were identified. Twenty-six or 90% were available for detailed follow-up. All cases underwent standardized elbow evaluations and results were compared using an elbow score based on a 100-point scale. The parameters evaluated were pain, motion, elbow and grip strength, and function in activities of daily living. In addition, injury and follow-up radiographs were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 18 months. There were 10 cases treated by open reduction and internal fixation and 16 cases treated by closed means. At final follow-up, the operatively treated group had a mean elbow score of 92 and 90% good/excellent results. The nonoperatively treated group had a mean elbow score of 77 and 44% good/excellent results. This difference was statistically significant (p less than 0.01). Radiographic analysis revealed a higher incidence of articular depression, displacement, and joint narrowing in the nonoperatively treated group. We conclude that displaced radial head fractures treated nonoperatively have a higher incidence of pain, functional limitations, loss of strength, and radiographic evidence of arthritis when compared to those treated by open reduction and internal fixation.     

可吸收软骨钉治疗MasonⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨小头骨折的疗效观察

目的探讨MasonⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨小头骨折切开复位可吸收软骨钉手术治疗的临床疗效。方法自2010年3月至2012年9月采用切开复位、可吸收软骨钉内固定治疗MasonⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨小头骨折28例,其中MasonⅡ型17例,MasonⅢ型11例,术后早期行功能锻炼,观察肘关节及前臂的屈伸旋转活动度、肌肉力量、稳定性及主观疼痛情况。结果所有患者均获得随访,随访时间6~18个月,平均8.3个月。疗效评定:优16例,良10例,可2例(Mayo标准),优良率92.86%。结论可吸收软骨钉内固定治疗MasonⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨小头骨折手术时间短,手术创伤小,功能康复快,临床效果良好。     

BOLD螺钉内固定治疗MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折

目的 探讨采用BOLD螺钉分步延期（ORIF）治疗MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折的方法 和临床疗效,为临床治疗此类骨折提供参考.方法 对16例MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折采用BOLD螺钉行ORIF,术后石膏固定10 d,早期功能锻炼.按照Broberg和Morrey的评定标准对肘关节功能评分.结果 16例均获随访,随访时间12～53个月,平均23个月.肘关节功能评分为92.0～100.0分,平均为98.3分;其中优15例,良1例.结论 采用BOLD螺钉ORIF治疗MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折,手术创伤小、功能恢复好,是治疗成人MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折较好的方法.     

解剖形锁定钛板内固定治疗 MasonⅡ型和Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折简

目的分析解剖形锁定钛板内固定治疗MasonⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折的疗效。方法对自2008—01—2011—12收治的28例MaSOnⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折,采用切开复位解剖形锁定钛板内固定术进行治疗,术中有4例行同种异体骨植骨,8例行内侧副韧带修复。结果28例均获得随访,按照Broberg和Money的肘关节功能评分标准进行评分,评分为平均86分（46．100分）;肘关节屈曲平均118°（95～135°）,伸直平均20°（0-30°）,旋前平均52°（15～60°）,旋后平均58°（20—70°）;本组：优15例,良10例,中3例,优良率89．3％。所有患者肘关节功能恢复良好,仅1例遗留肘部轻度疼痛,2例肘、腕部轻度无力。结论采用切开复位解剖锁定钛板内固定术治疗MasonⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折临床疗效满意,内固定牢固,可早期对I能宅目争楼．     

A comparative study of internal fixation and prosthesis replacement for radial head fractures of Mason type III

Although several treatment options for radial head fractures are available, no clear solutions exist. In this study we therefore compare open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with bipolar radial head prosthesis replacement in treatment of radial head fractures of Mason type III. Cement stem and bipolar radial prosthesis were used to treat 12 fresh cases and two old cases of Mason type III radial head fracture. As a control group, another eight cases of radial head type III fracture were treated with ORIF with cannulated screws and Kirschner (K) wires. The 14 patients who received radial head prosthesis replacement were followed-up for 15.9 months (range 10-27 months). According to elbow functional evaluation criteria by Broberg and Morrey, we found excellent results in nine cases, good in four, and fair in one. Mean follow-up of the eight cases in the ORIF group was 14 months (range 10-21 months), with good results in one case, fair in four, and poor in three. The result was good or excellent in 92.9% of prosthesis replacement patients and in 12.5% of ORIF patients. This difference is statistically significant (P = 0.0004; Fisher's exact test). We concluded that bipolar radial head prosthesis replacement is better than ORIF in treatment of Mason type III radial head fracture.     

桡骨头置换术治疗MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折

目的探讨桡骨头置换术治疗MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折的临床疗效。方法采用桡骨头置换术治疗12例MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折患者。结果随访6～38个月,无切口感染、桡神经损伤、假体松动等并发症发生。按Mayo肘关节功能评分：优7例,良4例,一般1例。结论桡骨头置换术适用于MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折的治疗,有利于恢复肘关节的稳定性和伸屈活动及前臂旋转功能。     

Open reduction and internal fixation of Mason type III radial head fractures with and without an associated elbow dislocation

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment of patients with Mason type III radial head fracture with and without elbow dislocation by open reduction with internal fixation, collateral ligament repair, and early mobilization. An additional purpose was to investigate whether there is any effect of elbow dislocation on the severity and functional outcome. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were treated with open reduction with internal fixation using low-profile miniplate and screws for comminuted fracture of the radial head. Eighteen fractures were Mason type III, and 7 fractures were Mason type III with elbow dislocation. There were 5 women and 20 men with a mean age of 34 years. The mean follow-up time was 27 months. Patients were reviewed for functional ability, physical examination, and radiographic assessment. RESULTS: The mean functional index in Mason type III fracture and Mason type III fracture with elbow dislocation was 87 for both groups. The mean range of motion at the elbow joint was calculated as 5 degrees extension to 136 degrees flexion for Mason type III and 7 degrees extension to 133 degrees flexion for Mason type III with elbow dislocation. The mean pronation and supination for all patients were 74 degrees and 67 degrees , respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Selected Mason III radial head fractures and fracture dislocations could be stabilized satisfactorily with internal fixation. Meticulous surgical technique, combined with rigid internal fixation, can allow early motion of the forearm and elbow after fixation of Mason type III radial head fractures with and without elbow dislocation and ligamentous injury. We believe there is still a role for prosthetic replacement in comminuted Mason III radial head fractures that cannot reliably be treated with open reduction and internal fixation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.     

桡骨头置换在肘关节恐怖三联征中的应用

目的总结采用人工桡骨头置换在治疗肘关节恐怖三联征中的临床疗效。方法自2008年2月至2013年8月,采用人工桡骨头置换治疗肘关节恐怖三联征13例,其中男7例,女6例;年龄33~75岁,平均46.7岁。左侧6例,右侧7例。受伤至手术时间为2~14 d,平均7.6 d。冠突骨折按Regan-Morrey分型,Ⅰ型8例,Ⅱ型5例;桡骨头骨折按Mason分型,Ⅱ型2例,Ⅲ型11例。采用Mayo评分评价术后肘关节功能。结果 13例患者均获得随访,随访时间为12~22个月,平均15.6个月。13例患者评分,优10例,良2例,可1例。末次随访时,可见1例人工桡骨头松动,未见脱出,肘关节功能可,12例未见感染、异位骨化、人工关节松动、脱出、肘关节滑膜炎、功能障碍、旋转时疼痛等并发症。结论人工桡骨头置换在治疗肘关节恐怖三联征的短期临床应用效果良好,可早期恢复肘关节稳定性,能够使肘关节早期活动,有利于康复。