Evaluation of Ultrasonic and ErCr:YSGG Laser Retrograde Cavity Preparation

Root end cavity preparation techniques aim to create a clean and properly shaped cavity in a short time. Although the use of ultrasonics has been widely recommended, a laser can also be used. This study evaluated the time required and quality of retrograde cavity preparations using ultrasonics or ErCr:YSGG laser. Thirty single-rooted teeth were instrumented, root filled, submitted to apicectomies, and grouped. Root end cavities were prepared by using the following: group 1 (G1): CVD (6.1107-6) ultrasonic retrotips (CVD-Vale, São José dos Campos, Brazil); group 2 (G2): EMS (DT-060/Berutti) ultrasonic retrotips (EMS, LeSentier, Switzerland); and group 3 (G3): ErCr:YSGG (G6/Waterlase; Biolase Technology, San Clemente, CA) laser tips. The time taken to complete the preparation was recorded. Epoxy resin replicas of the root apices were examined under a scanning electron microscope. The parameters for evaluation were the presence of fractures, and the quality of the preparations. The Waterlase showed the highest mean time for preparation of the root end cavities (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the CVD and EMS groups (p > 0.05). Fractures in the cavosurface angle occurred only in G2. G1 and G2 showed better scores for quality of preparation than G3 (p < 0.05). These results suggest that root end cavities should be prepared by ultrasonic tips.     

Effect of sonic and ultrasonic retrograde cavity preparation on the integrity of root apices of freshly extracted human teeth: scanning electron microscopy analysis

Sonic and ultrasonic root-end preparation devices permit the preparation of conservative and straight cavities. However, microfractures and marginal chipping can occur due to the vibratory action of such instruments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of retrograde preparations by using sonic and ultrasonic tips on the integrity of root-end surfaces. Eighty, human anterior teeth were grouped according to size and treated as follows: treatment 1: root-end resection (RR) and root-end cavity preparation (RP) with KIS ultrasonic retrotip; treatment 2: RR and RP with Satelec S12/90 (no diamond coating) ultrasonic retrotip; treatment 3: RR and RP with a diamond-coated retrotip attached to a sonic device (Sonics); treatment 4: RR and RP with Satelec S12/90D (diamond coated) ultrasonic retrotip. The root-end surface topographies were assayed by means of polyvinylsiloxane impressions and epoxy resin replicas. SEM pictures of each sample were taken before and after preparation, and the images were evaluated by using an image processing and analysis system. The parameters evaluated were shape quality, presence of cracks, and marginal chipping. The results showed no statistically significant differences among anatomic groups, treatments, or tooth sizes (p > 0.05). Because treatment 3 removed more dental structure than the others did, its use on small teeth is inadvisable.     

Shaping ability of Profile rotary nickel-titanium instruments with ISO sized tips in simulated root canals: Part 1

The aim of this study was to determine the shaping ability of ProFile 0.04 taper rotary nickel-titanium instruments with ISO sized tips in simulated canals. A total of 40 simulated root canals made up of four different shapes in terms of angle and position of curvature were prepared by ProFile instruments using the 'crown down' approach recommended by the manufacturer. Part 1 of this two-part report describes the efficacy of the instruments in terms of preparation time, instrument failure, canal blockages, loss of canal length and three-dimensional canal form. The time necessary for canal preparation was on average 5.2 min and was not influenced significantly by canal shape. Three instrument fractures occurred and a further 3 instruments deformed; size 35 instruments failed the most (4) followed by size 30 (2), four of the failures occurred in canals with 40° curves. None of the canals became blocked with debris and change in working distance was minimal. Intra-canal impressions of canal form demonstrated that most canals had apical stops and smooth canal walls whereas all canals had good flow and taper. Under the conditions of this study, ProFile 0.04 taper rotary nickel-titanium instruments with ISO sized tips prepared simulated canals rapidly and created good three-dimensional form.     

Ultrasonic root-end preparation Part 1. SEM analysis

Preparations of apical cavities in resected root ends using rotary burs, with and without citric acid rinse, and ultrasonic tips were compared based on the presence or absence of superficial debris and smear layer. Three groups of 20 extracted teeth each were prepared as follows; I, a size 010 round bur was used to prepare an apical cavity 2–3 mm down the long axis of the root; II, treatment as per group I followed by a 60-s rinse with a solution of 10:3 (10% citric acid, 3% Fe₂Cl₃); and III, an ultrasonic retrotip was used to prepare a 2–3 mm deep apical cavity. Roots were grooved longitudinally, split and prepared for SEM analysis at ×100 and ×780 magnification. Examiners were calibrated to a standardized grading system. Extensive statistical analyses indicated statistically significant differences within and among the groups (P<0.05). Root-end preparation with a bur created a heavy smear layer at all levels of the preparation. This layer was partially removed during ultrasonic preparation in the apical two-thirds. A greater removal of the smear layer was achieved with the citric acid rinse (P<0.05). Coronally, root-end preparations were contaminated with moderate to heavy amounts of debris with all techniques.     

Evaluation of different methods for the root-end cavity preparation

OBJECTIVE: The dentinal walls of root-end cavities were examined for the presence of cracks and debris in correlation with the area of the root surfaces that remained after the resection. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred extracted single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated, mounted in acrylic resin blocks, and the apical 2 mm of the root-apex was resected. According to the resected root surface area the teeth were divided into 2 groups having large (>2 mm(2)) or small (<2 mm(2)) surface area. For retrograde cavity preparation 4 devices were used: slow-speed handpiece, diamond coated stainless steel ultrasonic tip, smooth stainless steel ultrasonic tips, and sonic diamond-coated tips. Teeth were examined under a videomicroscope for the presence of fractures, dentin chips, and gutta-percha remnants on cavity walls. Preparation time was also recorded. RESULTS: Preparation with smooth stainless steel ultrasonic tips produced few intradentin cracks. Dentin debris was more frequently seen in rotary preparations whereas gutta-percha remnants were seen mainly at ultrasonically prepared teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Sonic and ultrasonic devices produced cleaner, well-centered, and more conservative root-end cavities than the rotary instrumentation. Cracks do not correlate directly with the surface area of the root-end surfaces but rather with the type of retrotip used to prepare the root-end cavity.     

根管截面形态对超声根尖倒预备效果的影响

目的 研究不同根管截面形态(椭网形和圆形)对超声根尖倒预备效果的影响.方法 选取直的单根管离体牙,根据根管截面形态分为椭圆形根管组和网形根管组,每组各20颗,分别进行根管预备和充填,截去根尖3 mm.采用超声工作尖进行根尖倒预备,在体式显微镜和扫描电镜下观测根尖窝洞形态规则性、残余牙胶量和窝洞清洁程度.结果 体式显微镜观测结果显示两组根尖窝洞形态规则性差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),椭圆形组中所有样本均可见牙胶残余,圆形组中70%的样本无牙胶残余,超声倒预备后残余牙胶量椭圆形根管组高于圆形根管组(P<0.01);电镜观测结果显示,圆形组85%的样本存在玷污层,95%的样本可见开放牙本质小管;椭圆形组中所有样本均有玷污层存在,仅40%的样本可见开放牙本质小管,根尖窝洞清洁程度椭圆形根管组低于圆形根管组(P<0.01).结论 超声根尖倒预备难以完全去除玷污层,椭圆形根管倒预备效果比圆形根管差.     

SEM analysis of the integrity of resected root apices of cadaver and extracted teeth after ultrasonic root-end preparation at different intensities

AIM: To compare the integrity of root apices of cadaver and extracted teeth after resection, ultrasonic root-end cavity preparation at medium and low ultrasonic power settings and retrieval. METHODOLOGY: Root canal treatment, perpendicular root-end resection and root-end preparation were performed on single-rooted anterior and premolar teeth (49 teeth in situ in maxillary and mandibular jaws from cadavers and 45 extracted teeth). Apical root-end cavities were prepared with the S12/90 degrees D tip and the Suni-Max ultrasonic unit (Satelec, Merignac, France) at the intensity prescribed by the manufacturer (power 7 at power mode S) (34 cadaver teeth, 30 extracted teeth) and at a lower intensity (power 4 at power mode S) (15 cadaver teeth, 15 extracted teeth). After ultrasonic preparation the cadaver teeth were retrieved from the jaws. Exaflex impressions (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) were made of the root apices after resection, root-end preparation and retrieval. These impressions were processed for SEM analysis, and the recordings evaluated for cracks and marginal chipping. RESULTS: In general, extracted teeth showed significantly more cracks and chipping than cadaver teeth. Lowering the ultrasonic power from medium to low intensity resulted in equal scores for cracks on extracted teeth and for chipping on cadaver teeth, in higher scores for cracks on cadavers and in lower scores for chipping on extracted teeth. Complete cracks and cracks originating from the root surface occurred only in extracted teeth. CONCLUSIONS: The number of cracks and degree of chipping caused by ultrasonic root-end preparation was higher on extracted teeth than on cadaver teeth. Lowering the ultrasonic power from medium to low intensity cannot be recommended as it resulted in more cracks and equal chipping on cadaver teeth. Investigation of techniques and materials should be conducted in situ and not on extracted teeth.     

Effect of ultrasonic tip and root-end filling material on bond strength

Objectives

The objective of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of three root-end filling materials (MTAA–MTA Angelus, MTAS–experimental MTA Sealer, and ZOE- zinc oxide and eugenol cement) in retrograde preparations performed with different ultrasonic tips (CVD, Trinity, and Satelec).

Materials and method

Ninety 2-mm root sections from single-rooted human teeth were used. The retrograde cavities were prepared by using the ultrasonic tips, coupled to a device for position standardization. The specimens were randomly divided into nine groups: CVD MTAA; CVD MTAS; CVD ZOE; Trinity MTAA; Trinity MTAS; Trinity ZOE; Satelec MTAA; Satelec MTAS; Satelec ZOE. Each resin disc/dentin/root-end filling material was placed in the machine to perform the push-out test. The specimens were examined in a stereomicroscope to evaluate the type of failure. Data were submitted to statistical analysis using ANOVA and Tukey tests (α?=?0.05).

Results

The highest bond strength was observed for the CVD tip irrespective of the material used (P?<?0.05). There was no significant difference for the Trinity TU-18 diamond and S12 Satelec tips (P?>?0.05). MTAA and MTAS showed highest bond strength. The most common type of failure was adhesion between the filling material and dentin wall, except for ZOE, where mixed failure was predominant.

Conclusions

The CVD tip favored higher bond strength of the root-end filling materials. MTA Angelus and experimental MTAS presented bond strength to dentin prepared with ultrasonic tips.

Clinical relevance

Root-end preparation with the CVD tip positively influences the bond strength of root-end filling materials. MTA Angelus and experimental MTAS present bond strength to be used as root-end filling materials.

     

Root-end cavity preparation using the MicroMega Sonic Retro-prep Tip™. SEM analysis

The objective of this laboratory study was to compare root-end cavities prepared with sonic Retro-prep tips in a MM 1500 Sonic Air handpiece with those created by burs in a conventional handpiece. A total of 80 single-rooted extracted human teeth with mature apices and straight canals were included in the study. Four groups of 20 extracted teeth were prepared as follows: I, a 3-4 mm root-end resection perpendicular to the long axis of the root, with a size 40 sonic Retro-prep tip creating an apical cavity 3 mm into root canal system; II, a 45° bevel of the root-face removing a 3-4 mm root segment and root-end preparation as per group I; III, root-end resection as per group I, with an apical cavity prepared using a size 010 inverted cone bur 3 mm down the long axis of the root; IV, resection as per group II, followed by an apical cavity preparation with a size 010 inverted cone bur 3 mm into the root canal system. The apical root portion and root-end cavities were replicated and prepared for SEM analysis at × 20 and × 80 magnification. The degree of chipping associated with the margin of the root-end cavities, as evaluated with a standard grading system, and the incidence of root-face cracks were noted. Marginal chipping of root-end cavities prepared using sonic instrumentation was significantly worse than that produced by burs (P<0.001). Perpendicular root-end resections showed significantly better scores than bevelled root-end resections (P<0.005). The incidence of root-face cracking was low with no significant difference between the experimental groups.     

The effect of ultrasonic removal of various root-end filling materials

Aim  To compare residual root-end filling material in apical root-end cavities following their removal with ultrasonic retrotips.
Methodology  Thirty single-rooted teeth were filled with Thermafil and AH Plus sealer. Root-ends were resected at 90°, 3 mm from the apex. Root-end cavities were prepared with diamond burs and ultrasonic retrotips and filled with one of three filling materials: group I: Retro-TC (calcium silicate-based cement), group II: IRM (Dentsply, Germany), group III: Vitrebond (3M ESPE, USA). After 30 days of storage, ultrasonic retrotips were used to remove materials from the root-end cavities. The ultrasonic application time was fixed at 60 s. Polyether impressions and replicas of the root-ends were made. Root apices and replicas were examined by one operator under a scanning electron microscope. Remnants of residual materials were evaluated using a four-level scoring system; fractures, smear layer and exposed dentinal tubules were also examined.
Results  Forty per cent of the specimens filled with Retro-TC revealed complete removal of the material with exposure of dentinal tubules, whilst 60% contained residual cement. Twenty per cent of specimens filled with IRM were completely devoid of material, whereas 80% had retained material. Ten per cent of specimens filled with Vitrebond retained a moderate amount of material whilst 90% had substantial retention of the material. Statistically significant differences were found ( P  < 0.05) amongst the three groups of materials.
Conclusions  Retro-TC was successfully removed in 40% of cases using ultrasonics retrotips for 60 s, whereas IRM and Vitrebond specimens had evidence of retained material in 80% and 90% of all specimens respectively.     

Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1

AIM: To determine the general efficacy and shaping ability of Hero 642 nickel-titanium rotary instruments during the preparation of simulated canals. Part 1 of this two-part report describes the efficacy of the instruments in terms of three-dimensional canal form. METHODOLOGY: A total of 40 simulated root canals made up of four different shapes in terms of angle and position of curvature were prepared by Hero 642 instruments using a crown-down preparation sequence. The efficacy of the instruments was assessed in terms of preparation time, instrument failure, canal blockages and loss of canal length. Intra-canal impressions were taken of the prepared canals in order to assess three-dimensional canal form. RESULTS: The mean time for canal preparation was 8.6 min and was influenced significantly (P < 0.05) by canal shape. Two instruments fractured and eight instruments deformed; significant differences were observed between canal shapes (P < 0.05). All of the canals remained patent. Fifteen canals (39.5%) maintained the correct working distance, 15 lost distance and eight canals gained length. Examination of intracanal impressions demonstrated that the majority of canals (79%) had apical stops; canal shape had a significant influence (P < 0.001) on the quality of apical stops. With one exception all canals had smooth canal walls and all of the canals showed good flow characteristics. Taper was poor in 30 canals (79%) and good in eight canals (21%). CONCLUSIONS: Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments prepared simulated canals rapidly but with a three-dimensional form that lacked adequate taper.     

Ultrasonic root-end preparation with smooth and diamond-coated tips

Zuolo ML, Perin FR, Ferreira MOF, Faria FP. Ultrasonic root-end preparation with smooth and diamond-coated tips. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999; 15: 265–268. © Munksgaard, 1999.
Abstract — The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of smooth and diamond-coated ultrasonic retrotips on the external and internal surfaces of root-end preparations with the aid of a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Forty-four mesial roots of human mandibular molars were selected. The canals were cleaned, shaped and obturated using gutta-percha and sealer. The apical portions were resected at a 45°-angle bevel exposing both mesial canals and the isthmus area. The roots were then divided into two groups according to the type of root-end preparation: Group A —performed with smooth retrotips (S) and Group B — performed with diamond-coated retrotips (DC). The specimens were coded and prepared for SEM evaluation. Observations of the external surface preparation showed that the S and DC retrotips produced very well-centered cavities involving both canals and isthmus area with minimal deviations and no perforative defects. When the internal surface of the root-end preparations was evaluated, it was evident that the use of S retrotips resulted in clean canal walls with little superficial debris and smear layer. Internal canal surfaces done with DC retrotips were irregular showing patent grooves, in contrast with the more uniform, regular and smoother surfaces when S retrotips were employed.     

Evaluation of apical preparations performed with ultrasonic diamond and stainless steel tips at different intensities using a scanning electron microscope in endodontic surgery

Objective: The objective of our study is to analyse (with the help of scanning electron microscopes) the quality of the dental root surface and the appearance of dental cracks after performing apical preparations using two diffe-rent types of ultrasonic tips. Study design: We used 32 single-rooted teeth that underwent a root canal and apical resection. Afterwards, the teeth were divided into 4 groups of 8 teeth each, with preparations of the apical cavities in the following manner: Group 1: stainless steel ultrasonic tip at 33KHz. Group 2: stainless steel ultrasonic tip at 30KHz. Group 3: diamond ultrasonic tip at 30KHz. Group 4: diamond ultrasonic tip at 33 KHz. The quality of the root surface and the presence of cracks were evaluated by one single observer using a scanning electron microscope. Results: All of the teeth in our study had cracks after the apical preparations. The mean number of cracks per tooth ranged between 6.1±1.9 (group 1) and 3.5±2.4 (group 4), with a significantly higher number found in the groups that used stainless steel tips (P=.03). The types of cracks produced involved: 8 complete cracks (4.5%), 167 incomplete cracks (94.4%), and 2 intradentinal cracks (1.1%), with no significant differences observed between the different frequencies used for each group. Conclusions: Stainless steel ultrasonic tips provoked a larger number of cracks than diamond tips. The frequency of vibration used did not have any effect on the number of cracks found. Key words:Apicoectomy, scanning electron microscope, therapeutic ultrasound, endodontic surgery, dentinal crack.     

A comparative study of root canal preparation with HERO 642 and Quantec SC rotary Ni-Ti instruments

AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare several parameters of root canal preparation using two different rotary nickel-titanium instruments: HERO 642 (Micro-Mega, Besancon, France) and Quantec SC (Tycom, Irvine, CA, USA). METHODOLOGY: Fifty extracted mandibular molars with root canal curvatures between 20 micro and 40 micro were imbedded into a muffle system. All root canals were prepared to size 45 (Quantec SC), or 40 (HERO 642), respectively. The following parameters were evaluated: straightening of curved root canals, postoperative root canal diameter, safety issues (file fractures, perforations, apical blockages, loss of working length), cleaning ability, and working time. RESULTS: Both Ni-Ti-systems maintained curvature well; the mean degree of straightening was 2.3 degrees for Quantec SC and 1.6 degrees for HERO 642. Most procedural incidents occurred with Quantec SC instruments (five fractures, three apical blockages, eight cases of loss of working length), HERO 642 preparation resulted in three blockages and one perforation. Following preparation with HERO 642, 63% of the root canals showed a round, 24% an oval, and 17% an irregular diameter; Quantec SC preparations resulted in a round diameter in 24% of the cases, oval shape in 29%, and irregular cross-section in 47% of the cases. Mean working time was shorter for HERO 642 (52 s) than for Quantec (117 s). Cleanliness of the root canal walls was investigated under the SEM using a five-score system for debris and smear layer. For debris HERO 642 achieved better results (80% scores 1 and 2) than Quantec SC (76%). The results for smear layer were similar: cleaner root canal walls were found after preparation with HERO 642 (53% scores 1 and 2), followed by Quantec SC (41%). CONCLUSIONS: Both systems respected original root canal curvature well and showed good cleaning ability; Quantec SC showed deficiencies in terms of safety.     

Evaluation of Quality and Preparation Time of Retrograde Cavities in Root Canals Filled with GuttaCore and Cold Lateral Condensation Technique

Introduction

The aim of this study was to measure the time consumed preparing retrograde cavities in root canals of maxillary molars filled using the GuttaCore (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) technique and the cold lateral condensation technique (CLC) and to examine the quality of the root-end cavity preparation by ultrasonic tips using micro–computed tomographic (micro-CT) scanning.

Marginal adaptation of a new compomer under different conditioning methods

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study evaluated the marginal adaptation of compomer restorations placed using three different conditioning protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty extracted caries-free molars with 3mm diameter cylindrical cavity preparations were divided randomly into three groups based upon the conditioning treatment used: (I) 36% phosphoric acid; (II) non-rinse conditioner (NRC, Dentsply DeTrey); and (III) no conditioning. Cavities were restored with Dyract AP using Prime&Bond NT (Dentsply DeTrey) as an adhesive. Silicone impressions of the briefly etched enamel surfaces were taken after finishing the restorations. Each sample was then longitudinally sectioned and impressions were taken. Epoxy resin replicas were prepared for SEM analysis. Qualitative and quantitative assessment were performed separately for the enamel- and dentine-restorative interface. RESULTS: Enamel fractures and open margins along the enamel-restorative margin were observed in some specimens in each group. No statistically significant difference was found in the percentage of gaps/cohesive failures between specimens prepared using different conditioning methods. For the dentine-restorative interface, uniform hybrid layers and long resin tags were often observed in Groups I and II. The hybrid layer in Group III was irregular and discontinuous along the interface. A significant difference (p<0.01) in the proportion of marginal gap was found between Group I (2%) and Group III (30%). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treating the cavity with 36% phosphoric acid significantly improved the adaptation of the compomer and adhesive to dentine compared with no etching. The marginal quality at the enamel-compomer interface was not affected by the conditioning method used.     

后牙弯曲根管充填方法的根尖封闭能力研究

本实验用常规法、逐步后退法和超声法三种方法预备后牙弯曲细小根管，再分别用传统侧压充填法和热侧压充填法进行充填，然后比较其根尖封闭能力。结果表明：热侧压充填法的根尖封闭能力优于传统的侧压充填法，并能在一定程度上弥补常规法和超声法预备弯曲细小根管成形不佳的缺陷，增加其根尖封闭能力     

Ex vivo microscopic assessment of factors affecting the quality of apical seal created by root-end fillings

AIM: (i) To evaluate the incidence of microcracks around root-end preparations completed with ultrasonic tips and their relationship with the root filling technique and thickness of surrounding dentine. (ii) To investigate the effect of rapid exposure to a water-soluble dye of Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM), Super Ethoxybenzoic Acid (sEBA) and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), on the marginal adaptation and microleakage of root-end fillings. (iii) To describe the microstructure of the surface of root-end filling materials. METHODOLOGY: Ninety-two single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups (n = 46) according to the root canal instrumentation/filling techniques. Group 1 consisted of specimens in which canal preparation was completed using a crown-down technique and then filled with the Thermafil system (TF group); Group 2 consisted of specimens in which canal preparation was completed using a step-back technique and lateral condensation (LC group). Following root-end resection and ultrasonic cavity preparation, the samples were further divided into three subgroups (n = 24) for root-end filling with IRM, sEBA or MTA. The ultrasonic preparation time was recorded. Eight teeth were kept as positive and 12 as negative controls. Following immersion in Indian ink for 7 days, all resected root surfaces were evaluated for the presence of microcracks and the cross-sectional area of root-end surface and root-end filling were measured to evaluate the thickness of the dentinal walls. Thereafter, the samples were sectioned longitudinally so as to assess the depth of dye penetration and marginal adaptation of root-end fillings. Negative controls longitudinally sectioned were used to describe microstructural characteristics of the root-end filling materials using scanning electron microscopic (SEM) techniques. RESULTS: Although the thickness of dentinal walls between groups 1 and 2 was similar, the ultrasonic preparation time and number of microcracks were significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the TF group. Both groups had a significant correlation between microcracks and ultrasonic preparation time (P < 0.001). sEBA and IRM had better adaptation and less leakage compared with MTA. A SEM analysis displayed microstructural differences between the root-end filling materials. CONCLUSION: Microcracks can occur independently of the thickness of dentinal walls and may be associated with the prolonged ultrasonic preparation time required for the removal of the root filling during root-end cavity preparation. Although sEBA and IRM had better behaviour than MTA regarding microleakage and marginal adaptation, it is possible that exposure of MTA to a water-soluble dye before achieving full set and its porous microstructure contributed to the results.     

Comparative study of root-canal preparation using Lightspeed and Quantec SC rotary NiTi instruments

AIM: To compare several parameters of root-canal preparation using two different rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments: Lightspeed (Lightspeed Inc, San Antonio, TX, USA) and Quantec SC (Tycom, Irvine, USA). METHODOLOGY: Fifty extracted mandibular molars with root-canal curvatures between 20 degrees and 40 degrees were embedded into a muffle system. All root canals were prepared to size 45 followed by a stepback in 1-mm increments to size 70 (Lightspeed) or 45 (Quantec SC), using a high-torque motor at 1300 or 350 r.p.m. respectively. In both groups, irrigation was performed with 2 mL NaOCl (3%) after each instrument size. RC-Prep (Premier, PA, USA) was used as a chelating agent. The following parameters were evaluated: straightening of curved root canals, postoperative root-canal diameter, working safety (instrument fractures, perforations, apical blockages, loss of working length (WL)), cleaning ability and working time. Cleanliness of the root-canal walls was investigated under SEM using 5-score indices for debris and smear layer. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon's test (P < 0.05) for straightening and Fisher's exact test (P < 0.05) for comparison of cross-sections, contact between pre- and postoperative diameter, root-canal cleanliness and working time. RESULTS: Both NiTi systems maintained the curvature well: the mean degree of straightening was 1.8 degrees for Lightspeed and 1.7 degrees for Quantec SC; differences were not significant. Procedural incidents occurred with Quantec SC in 12 root canals (three fractures, four apical blockages and five cases of loss of WL), preparation with Lightspeed resulted in five fractures, one apical blockage and five cases of loss of WL (11 incidents). Following preparation with Lightspeed, 55.5% of the root canals had a round diameter, 25% an oval and 19.5% an irregular diameter; Quantec SC preparations resulted in a round diameter in 51.5%, oval shape in 33.3% and irregular cross-sections in 15.2% of the cases. Mean working time was similar for Quantec SC (161 s) and Lightspeed (155 s); the difference was not significant. For debris, Lightspeed and Quantec achieved 64 and 63% for scores 1 and 2, respectively. For smear layer, Lightspeed and Quantec achieved only 13.3 and 27.4% for scores 1 and 2, respectively. Differences were not significant for either debris or smear layer. CONCLUSIONS: Both systems respected original root-canal curvature well and prepared acceptable diameter forms. The cleaning ability was judged not satisfactory for both systems. Both systems showed deficiencies in working safety.     

Polymicrobial coronal leakage of super EBA root-end fillings following two methods of root-end preparation

The aim of this study was to compose in vitro coronal leakage of a super EBA root-end filling material after two root-end cavity preparation techniques. A mixed anaerobic microbial marker was used. Forty-five extracted human teeth with straight, single root canals were prepared chemo-mechanically to a size 40 master apical file. The teeth were divided into experimental groups (35 teeth) and control groups (10 teeth). Forty teeth (35 experimental teeth and five negative control teeth) were obturated by lateral condensation of cold gutta-percha with Tubliseal EWT sealer. The remaining five teeth were not obturated and served as positive controls. These teeth were stored for 6 months in artificial saliva. The apical 3-4 mm of each root was resected perpendicular to the long axis of the root and a root-end cavity prepared to a depth of 3 mm using either a size 008 rosehead burr or an ultrasonic retroprep tip. Freshly mixed EBA cement was placed into the root-end cavity. The entire root surface of each tooth, except the cutting surface of the apical end, was sealed with nail varnish. The coronal part of each root canal was sealed with the cut end of a tube and placed in a bottle containing sterile Brain Heart Infusion Broth (BHIB). A marker consisting of Anaerobic streptococci and Fusobacterium nucleatum in BHIB was placed in each coronal chamber at 7-day intervals and daily observations were made for bacterial growth in the apical chamber for 60 days. All positive control teeth exhibited bacterial leakage within 48 h, whilst the apical chamber of negative control teeth remained uncontaminated throughout the test period. Fifty-nine percent ( n = 10) of the specimens prepared with a burr showed leakage after 90 days, whilst only 22% ( n = 4) of the ultrasonically prepared group showed leakage after the same time. The group prepared with ultrasonic tips showed statistically significant less specimens with leakage ( P < 0.05) than the group prepared with burrs.