首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.

Introduction

Imaging methods are essential for the correct identification of root canal anatomy, which is a key factor for successful endodontic therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of periapical radiography (PR) and cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging in identifying the apical delta (AD) using micro-computed tomographic imaging as the gold standard.

Methods

PR and CBCT images of 110 human premolars (120 root canals) were obtained using the VistaScan digital intraoral system (Durr Dental, Beitigheim-Bissinger, Germany) and the 3D Accuitomo CBCT unit (J Morita, Kyoto, Japan), respectively. Two oral radiologists assessed the PR and CBCT images for the presence of ADs using a 5-point scale. Additionally, in the CBCT images, the number of apical foramina was also evaluated. The gold standard was established by means of micro–computed tomographic imaging. The diagnostic values related to PR and CBCT imaging were compared using the McNemar test. The detection of the number of foramina was compared using the paired t test (α ≤ 0.05).

Results

ADs were present in 40 root canals (33.3%). Both PR and CBCT images differed significantly from the gold standard (P < .05) in the detection of ADs. CBCT imaging showed higher values than PR for all diagnostic tests (P < .05). Despite the moderate accuracy of PR (0.62) and CBCT imaging (0.73), these methods presented very low sensitivity values (0.07 and 0.35 for PR and CBCT, respectively). CBCT imaging had a tendency of underestimating the number of foramina (P < .05).

Conclusions

CBCT imaging showed better performance than PR in the detection of ADs; both imaging modalities underestimate its presence when compared with the gold standard. In general, the number of apical foramina cannot be reliably assessed using CBCT imaging.  相似文献   

2.
3.
《Journal of endodontics》2020,46(6):832-838
IntroductionCone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging is useful in detecting apical periodontitis, which is often missed in periapical (PA) radiographs. This study aimed to identify preoperative predictors correlated with the presence of apical periodontitis visible only in CBCT images and to investigate the important characteristics of such lesions.MethodsIn total, 332 consecutive patients with both PA radiographs and CBCT images were enrolled in this study. The patients’ clinical charts were reviewed retrospectively to collect information regarding their symptoms and diagnoses. Periapical lesions were assessed using a modified CBCT PA index by 2 endodontists. Patient-related factors (age, sex, and symptoms) and tooth-related factors (tooth type, location, pulp status, and pulpal diagnosis) were assessed to determine their relationships with the presence of apical periodontitis visible only in CBCT images.ResultsApical periodontitis was detected in 24.6% and 35.5% of untreated teeth by PA radiographs and CBCT images, respectively. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, pulp necrosis was significantly correlated with the presence of apical periodontitis visible only in CBCT images (odds ratio = 5.401; 95% confidence interval, 1.911–15.265; P = .001); the involvement of molars showed borderline nonsignificant correlation (odds ratio = 2.843; 95% confidence interval, 0.990–8.164; P = .052). Lesion sizes smaller than 2 mm in diameter and the involvement of molars were significant factors of lesions visible only in CBCT images (P < .05).ConclusionsPulp necrosis was a preoperative predictor of apical periodontitis visible only in CBCT images. This research could provide a proper indication for CBCT imaging at diagnostic stages.  相似文献   

4.

Introduction

The purpose of this study was firstly to compare the impact of radiographs, cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging, and 3D Endo software (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) on the assessment of root canal anatomy and radiographic quality of endodontic treatment and secondly to assess stress levels in the same cohort of residents performing endodontic treatment.

Methods

Sixty patients requiring primary molar endodontic treatment were allocated randomly into 3 groups: group 1 (n = 20), conventional radiographs (periapical radiography [PR]) only; group 2 (n = 20), PR and CBCT imaging; and group 3 (n = 20), PR, CBCT imaging, and 3D Endo software. All treatment was performed using a standardized protocol. Residents completed a questionnaire to assess their stress levels and usefulness of the imaging modality used. The radiographic quality of completed cases was assessed by 2 experienced endodontists who were not involved in the supervision of the cases being assessed.

Results

Groups 2 (CBCT imaging) and 3 (PR, CBCT imaging, and 3D Endo) proved significantly better than group 1 (PR) (P < .001) for assessing the number of root canals and anatomy and estimating the working lengths. Group 3 provided a significantly more accurate determination of the working level (P = .002). There were significantly more cases with obturation short of the apex (<2 mm) and voids in group 1 compared with group 3 (P < .05) and a significantly higher number of cases with voids in group 1 compared with group 3 (P < .01). Clinicians found treatment to be moderately or very stressful in 75%, 5%, and 0% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

Conclusions

3D Endo software followed by CBCT imaging were found to be more desirable for the evaluation of root canal anatomy and working lengths and reducing the residents' stress levels.  相似文献   

5.
《Journal of endodontics》2020,46(8):1059-1066
IntroductionThe purpose of this in vivo study was to evaluate the accuracy of small-volume cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging compared with conventional periapical radiography (CPR) in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures (VRFs) using exploratory surgery as the reference standard.MethodsEighty-two dental records of 85 teeth with suspected VRFs that underwent CPR, CBCT imaging, and exploratory surgery were included. Two observers assessed CPR and CBCT images independently for the presence or absence of root fractures, and findings from the exploratory surgery were considered the reference standard. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the receiver operating characteristic curve values were obtained. The effect of single- and multirooted teeth on diagnostic accuracy as well as the association between clinical symptoms and the presence of VRFs were also assessed.ResultsVRFs were surgically detected in 64 of the 85 teeth (75.3%), of which 62.5% were multirooted and 76.6% had intracanal posts. CBCT imaging was more sensitive and accurate (65.6% and 64%) than CPR (27.3% and 40.5%). Both CPR and CBCT diagnostic accuracies were higher in single- than multirooted teeth. Pain on percussion, a localized periodontal pocket, and tooth mobility were associated with the presence of VRFs (P < .05; odds ratio = 4.15, 13.5 and 4.1, respectively).ConclusionsThe accuracy of CBCT imaging for the diagnosis of VRFs was poor, although it was higher than with CPR. Multirooted teeth in the presence of intracanal posts may limit its diagnostic value.  相似文献   

6.
《Journal of endodontics》2022,48(9):1121-1128
IntroductionInadequate management of external cervical resorption (ECR) lesions may impact the treatment outcome. This study aimed to ascertain the influence of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in clinical decision-making choices in cases of ECR among dentistry specialists (endodontics, prosthodontics, oral surgery, periodontics orthodontics, and general dentistry). A secondary objective was to evaluate the self-reported level of difficulty in choosing a treatment plan before and after viewing the CBCT images.MethodsSixty examiners from different specialties were chosen to evaluate 12 cases of ECR lesions. Each case included clinical photographs, digital periapical radiographs, and a small-volume CBCT scan. In the first assessment, the examiners were given all the relevant information of each case, except the CBCT scan. Each examiner was asked to select 1 of the proposed treatment options and assess the difficulty of decision-making. Four weeks later, the examiners randomly reviewed the same 12 cases with additional information from the CBCT data.ResultsAfter the CBCT evaluation, the clinicians changed their treatment plan in 72.2% of the cases (P < .05). The self-reported level of difficulty in choosing a treatment changed in all groups after evaluating the CBCT scans (P < .05). After viewing the CBCT scan, the extraction option increased significantly in all groups (P < .05).ConclusionsCBCT scan had a significant impact on clinical decision-making in cases of ECR evaluated by different specialists.  相似文献   

7.
《Journal of endodontics》2020,46(9):1235-1240
IntroductionThis retrospective study used cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging to evaluate the differences in the mucosal thickness of the Schneiderian membrane in primary and secondary endodontic lesions.MethodsA total of 121 CBCT scans were analyzed. Clinical features such as sex, age, size and volume of the periapical lesion, dimension of the bone, morphology, and relationship between the roots and the mucosal thickness were recorded and analyzed in primary and secondary endodontic lesions in CBCT sagittal and coronal planes. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and multiple logistic regression (P < .05).ResultsStatistical analysis revealed no significant differences in membrane thickness between the primary and secondary lesions in the sagittal and coronal planes (P = .08 and .06). Differences between age groups were statistically significant in both groups (P < .05). The volume of the periapical lesions of the secondary endodontic lesions were statistically greater than that of the primary lesions (P < .05). Mucosal thickness prevalence increased when the volume of the lesion was greater, and the bone dimension was narrower in maxillary second premolars and first and second molars. Teeth with 2 or more affected roots were directly related to increased sinus mucosa thickening.ConclusionsCBCT images showed no differences in mucosal thickening between primary and secondary endodontic lesions.  相似文献   

8.
IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of low-dose multidetector computed tomographic (LD-MDCT) imaging for the volumetric measurement of simulated periapical lesions.MethodsEighteen monoradicular teeth were introduced in bone blocks, and periapical lesions were simulated at the periapical region of each tooth. All teeth were imaged using 4 acquisition protocols: large (dentoalveolar) field of view (FOV) cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging (120 kV, 5 mA, and 0.2-mm voxel), small (dental) FOV CBCT imaging (90 kV, 10 mA, and 0.2-mm voxel), standard multidetector computed tomographic imaging (120 kV, 50 mA, and 0.62-mm voxel), and LD-MDCT imaging (120 kV, 10 mA, and 0.62-mm voxel). Tomographic images were evaluated by a single trained and calibrated examiner (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.991) using ITK-SNAP segmentation software (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). The gold standard was obtained by the impressions of the lesions with regular fluid addition silicone and individual weighing using a precision analytical scale. Data were evaluated by the repeated measures analysis of variance test; the significance level was defined as P < .05.ResultsNo statistical differences (P > .05) were found among the groups regardless of the device, milliamperage, FOV, or voxel size.ConclusionsLD-MDCT shows performance comparable with other standard reference methods for measuring the volume of periapical lesions and can be a useful and safe protocol in clinical situations in which CBCT imaging is not available, such as in cases of patients admitted to hospitals.  相似文献   

9.
《Journal of endodontics》2023,49(4):419-429
AimTo assess and compare reader performance in interpreting digital periapical (PA) radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in endodontic disease detection, using a free-response, factorial model.Materials and MethodsA reader performance study of 2 image test sets was undertaken using a factorial, free-response design, accounting for the independent variables: case type, case severity, reader type, and imaging modality. Twenty-two readers interpreted 60 PA and 60 CBCT images divided into 5 categories: diseased–subtle, diseased–moderate, diseased–obvious, nondiseased–subtle, and nondiseased–obvious. Lesion localization fraction, specificity, false positive (FP) marks, and the weighted alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic figure of merit were calculated.ResultsCBCT had greater specificity than PA in the obvious nondiseased cases (P = .01) and no significant difference in the subtle nondiseased category. Weighted alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic values were higher for PA than CBCT in the subtle diseased (P = .02) and moderate diseased (P = .01) groups with no significant difference between in the obvious diseased groups. CBCT had higher mean FPs than PA (P < .05) in subtle diseased cases. Mean lesion localization fraction in the moderate diseased group was higher in PA than CBCT (P = .003). No relationships were found between clinical experience and all diagnostic performance measures, except for in the obvious diseased CBCT group, where increasing experience was associated mean FP marks (P = .04).ConclusionsReader performance in the detection of endodontic disease is better with PA radiography than CBCT. Clinical experience does not impact upon the accuracy of interpretation of both PA radiography and CBCT.  相似文献   

10.
《Journal of endodontics》2019,45(6):750-755.e2
IntroductionMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to aid in determining the presence and extent of cracks/fractures in teeth because of better contrast without ionizing radiation. The objectives were to develop MRI criteria for root crack/fracture identification and to establish reliability and accuracy in their detection.MethodsMRI-based criteria for crack/fracture appearance was developed by an MRI physicist and a panel of 6 dentists. Twenty-nine human adult teeth previously extracted after a clinical diagnosis of a root crack/fracture were frequency matched to 29 controls. Samples were scanned using an in vivo MRI protocol and the reference standard (ie, ex vivo limited field of view cone-beam computed tomographic [CBCT] imaging). A blinded, 4-member panel evaluated the images with a proportion randomly retested to establish intrarater reliability. Overall observer agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were computed for each imaging modality.ResultsSubjectively, MRI has increased crack/fracture contrast and is less prone to artifacts from radiodense materials relative to CBCT imaging. Intrarater reliability for MRI was fair to excellent (κ = 0.38–1.00), and for CBCT imaging, it was moderate to excellent (κ = 0.66–1.00). Sensitivity for MRI was 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.76; P = .46), and for CBCT imaging, it was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.59–0.76; P = .46). Specificity for MRI was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.64–0.94; P < .01), and for CBCT imaging, it was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.73–0.98; P < .01).ConclusionsDespite advantages of increased contrast and the absence of artifacts from radiodense materials in MRI, comparable measures of sensitivity and specificity (to limited field of view CBCT imaging) suggest MRI quality improvements are needed, specifically in image acquisition and postprocessing parameters. Given the early stage of technology development, there may be a use for MRI in detecting cracks/fractures in teeth.  相似文献   

11.
Objective:To compare dental plaster model (DPM) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the measurement of the dental arches, and investigate whether CBCT image artifacts compromise the reliability of such measurements.Materials and Methods:Twenty patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of metallic restorations in the posterior teeth. Both dental arches of the patients were scanned with the CBCT unit i-CAT, and DPMs were obtained. Two examiners obtained eight arch measurements on the CBCT images and DPMs and repeated this procedure 15 days later. The arch measurements of each patient group were compared separately by the Wilcoxon rank sum (Mann-Whitney U) test, with a significance level of 5% (α  =  .05). Intraclass correlation measured the level of intraobserver agreement.Results:Patients with healthy teeth showed no significant difference between all DPM and CBCT arch measurements (P > .05). Patients with metallic restoration showed significant difference between DPM and CBCT for the majority of the arch measurements (P > .05). The two examiners showed excellent intraobserver agreement for both measuring methods with intraclass correlation coefficient higher than 0.95.Conclusion:CBCT provided the same accuracy as DPM in the measurement of the dental arches, and was negatively influenced by the presence of image artifacts.  相似文献   

12.
《Journal of endodontics》2020,46(7):915-935
IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to perform a quality assessment and provide a scientific-based checklist for prevalence studies on root and root canal anatomy by appraising the methodological quality of in vivo studies using cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging as the assessment tool.MethodsA systematic assessment of the literature was conducted, and 211 studies were selected and submitted to a methodological evaluation. Data were grouped into categories such as journal impact factor, open access availability, language, study origin, journal publisher, sample size, and CBCT settings. Interrater agreement was calculated by applying the Holsti method and Cohen kappa. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Pearson correlation coefficient were undertaken to assess the different variables (α = 0.05).ResultsThe included studies (N = 211) reported data on 247,616 teeth from 41 countries. The maxillary first molar was the most studied tooth (n = 69) and the second mesiobuccal canal the most investigated anatomic feature. The highest scores were associated with high-impact journals (r = 0.482, P < .05), large sample sizes (r = 0.374, P < .05), non–open access availability (P < .05), and English-based language (P < .05), but geographic region and journal publisher also had an impact on quality scores. The identified methodological gaps were used to formulate a scientific-based checklist for this type of study.ConclusionsAlthough a small improvement in the global quality of the studies was observed over the years, only less than half of the studies correctly addressed the participant recruitment and frame and had an adequate sample size or provided sufficient CBCT imaging settings. The proposed checklist highlights the most pertinent points to guide researchers throughout the experimental design and the implementation of epidemiological cross-sectional studies of this nature.  相似文献   

13.
《Journal of endodontics》2014,40(12):2053-2056
IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the volume of removed dentin, transportation, and centering ability of ProTaper Next (PTN) system with and without glide path preparation by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.MethodsSixty mesiobuccal canals of mandibular first molars with curvatures of 25°−35° were divided into 3 experimental groups (n = 20) according to the instrumentation technique as follows: group PG/PTN (glide path was created with ProGlider [PG]) and canals were shaped with PTN system), group PF/PTN (glide path was created with PathFile [PF]) and canals were shaped with PTN system), and group PTN (glide path was not performed and canals were shaped with PTN system only). Canals were scanned before and after instrumentation by using CBCT scanner to evaluate root canal transportation and centering ratio at 3, 5, and 7 mm from the apex and volumetric changes. Data were statistically analyzed, and the significance level was set at P < .05.ResultsThere was no significant difference among the tested groups regarding the volume of removed dentin and centering ratio (P > .05). At 3-mm and 5-mm levels, the PG/PTN group showed a significantly lower mean transportation value among the groups (P < .05). However, at 7-mm level, there was no significant difference in canal transportation among the groups (P > .05).ConclusionsPG/PTN instrumentation method revealed better performance with fewer canal aberrations when compared with instrumentation performed with PF/PTN or PTN only.  相似文献   

14.
IntroductionRadiography has played a fundamental role in the advancement of nonsurgical root canal therapy (NSRCT), allowing for more accurate diagnosis and treatment. Typically, providers choose to perform NSRCT using periapical (PA) radiographs alone or, often in more difficult cases, in conjunction with cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of NSRCT based on imaging modality selection for the initial treatment of maxillary first molars.MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted using 1385 cases of NSRCT on maxillary first molars. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics and treatment outcomes. Based on the imaging modality used, patients were stratified into 2 groups (PA radiographs alone or PA radiographs + CBCT imaging). Those who required additional treatment(s) after the completion of NSRCT were classified as having “posttreatment disease.” Statistical analysis was performed to assess the differences between groups.ResultsAfter the completion of primary endodontic therapy, 5.8% (n = 81) of the entire sample had posttreatment disease. CBCT imaging was used in 13.4% (n = 185) of NSRCTs. Although not significant, cases that were difficult enough to require the use of CBCT imaging had a higher rate of posttreatment disease compared to those that could be completed with PA radiographs alone (8.6% vs 5.4%, P > .05). Results from a multivariable logistic regression model showed that the need for CBCT imaging had a nonsignificant positive association with posttreatment disease (P > .05).ConclusionsThe decision to use CBCT imaging appears to serve as a proxy for case complexity and the associated increase in risk of posttreatment disease. This is important to keep in mind when assessing treatment prognosis.  相似文献   

15.
IntroductionThe purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the combined use of 2 cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) volumes obtained with the tooth of interest positioned at different orientations in the detection of vertical root fracture (VRF).MethodsThirty single-rooted teeth were divided into 2 main groups (n = 15): control and with VRF. The teeth were individually placed in a phantom composed of a human skull and mandible, which was CBCT scanned in 2 spatial orientations: conventional (with the Frankfurt plane parallel to the floor) and angled acquisition (tilted 90° backward). Also, each tooth was scanned with gutta-percha, a metal post, and without any intracanal material. Three oral radiologists individually evaluated the images resulting from conventional acquisition and verified the presence or absence of VRF (conventional CBCT assessment), setting a score on a 5-point scale. Subsequently, the observers evaluated both images resulting from the conventional and angled acquisitions (combined CBCT assessment). The diagnostic values of the conventional and combined assessments were compared using 2-way analysis of variance with the post hoc Tukey test. The significance level was set at 5% (α = 0.05).ResultsThe combined CBCT assessment showed higher accuracy and sensitivity in the VRF diagnosis of teeth filled with gutta-percha (P < .05). In teeth with a metal post, all diagnostic values were higher in the combined CBCT assessment (P < .05).ConclusionsThis preliminary study suggests that the CBCT-based diagnosis of VRF in teeth with intracanal material was improved when the assessment combines images obtained at 2 orientations.  相似文献   

16.
IntroductionCone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging is a valuable diagnostic tool for endodontics. Some studies report that CBCT images have limitations in representing the true clinical presentation. This prospective, in vivo study compared limited field of view (LFOV) CBCT measurements with clinical measurements made during endodontic surgery.MethodsEighty-seven subjects requiring endodontic surgery and LFOV CBCT acquisition of the surgical site were enrolled. Data collection involved clinicians answering standardized questions during the radiographic and surgical assessment. Intraoperatively, data were collected and photographically documented. Postoperatively, CBCT scans were evaluated by 3 calibrated, board-certified specialists: 2 endodontists and 1 oral and maxillofacial radiologist. The 2 subsets of data were compared through statistical analysis to quantify their relationship.ResultsThe subjects included 65 maxillary and 29 mandibular teeth from 87 subjects: 25 women and 62 men with an average age of 42 years old. The CBCT evaluators correctly identified the presence or absence of buccal plate fenestrations with 91.0% accuracy (95% confidence interval, 83.1–96.0) with 89.4% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity. The area of fenestrations measured clinically (mean = 19.6 ± 33.4 mm2) was generally larger than the area measured by CBCT imaging (mean across CBCT evaluators = 12.2 ± 19.1 mm2). Fenestration size in the maxillary arch was more likely to be underestimated than in the mandibular arch (P < .0001). Vertical bone height was also underestimated when measured on CBCT imaging.ConclusionsBased on the findings of this study, LFOV CBCT imaging accurately identifies the presence or absence of buccal plate fenestrations, yet, when a fenestration is present, underestimates its area.  相似文献   

17.
《Journal of endodontics》2021,47(11):1790-1795
IntroductionA new method for the approximation of the root canal's cross-sectional shape and its working width using cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) or micro–computed tomographic (micro-CT) imaging was introduced.MethodsScanned data from 29 extracted human mandibular first and second molar distal root canals without instrumentation were reconstructed and analyzed with a self-developed measurement algorithm. The 3-dimensional volume models were sliced perpendicular to the vertical axis. Using different 2-dimensional parametric models, the contour of each root canal slice was approximated and used to determine the canal's cross-sectional dimensions. The measurements of minor width, major width, and the root canal's conicity were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance.ResultsThe measured minor and major widths of the investigated root canals were significantly higher (probability value P < .05) when evaluated by CBCT images than the results obtained from micro-CT data. Both dimensions increased starting from the apical foramen (P < .01). The narrowest measured canal widths were 0.19–0.24 mm for CBCT imaging and 0.09–0.21 mm for micro-CT imaging in the apical part. The maximum values for conicity were between 13% and 17% in the cervical third.ConclusionsThe 3-dimensional imaging data from CBCT and micro-CT imaging enabled a valuable anatomic assessment of the root canal's cross-sectional working width along the canal up to the physiological foramen in order to determine an adequate apical diameter as well as the correct measured taper in the cervical and medial part.  相似文献   

18.
《Journal of endodontics》2022,48(9):1100-1106
IntroductionThis study aimed to identify clinical and radiographic characteristics of teeth with longitudinal fractures to assist in the diagnosis and differentiation between cracked teeth and teeth with vertical root fracture (VRF).MethodsNinety-five patients (95 teeth) diagnosed with a longitudinal fracture (only cracked teeth or VRF) through clinical visualization of the fracture line were included in this study. Clinical and radiographic data were collected from the patients' records to identify the characteristics associated with each condition. Fifty-four patients (54 teeth) had full radiographic (periapical [PA] radiography and a cone-beam computed tomographic [CBCT] scan) and clinical findings (probing depths and clinical images of the fracture line). PA and CBCT images were evaluated by 2 independent examiners to identify the different patterns of bone loss associated with these teeth (no defect, an angular defect, a J-shaped defect, or a combined defect). Cohen kappa analysis was used to compare the results between the 2 examiners and between the findings of the PA and CBCT images. Pearson chi-square analysis, the Fisher exact test, and adjusted Bonferroni post hoc testing were used to establish an association between the type and extension of the longitudinal fracture with the probing depth, the CBCT pattern of bony defects, and the presence/absence of the buccal plate and also to compare the clinical and radiographic characteristics of cracked teeth and teeth with VRF (P < .05).ResultsCBCT images had 4.4 times the odds of detecting bony defects suggestive of longitudinal fractures compared with PA radiographs. Teeth with VRF were more associated with indirect restorations, deep probing (>6 mm), absence of the cortical plate, and a J-shaped defect on the CBCT image (P < .05). On the other hand, cracked teeth were associated with direct restorations, shallow probing (<6 mm), an intact cortical plate, and the presence of an angular defect on the CBCT image (P < .001). There was a significant correlation between a radicular extension of the fracture line and deep probing as well as J-shaped defects (P < .05).ConclusionsPatterns of bone loss on CBCT imaging can likely differentiate between cracked teeth and teeth with VRF. The presence of an angular defect may suggest the presence of a crack in the tooth before intervention. J-shaped defects, deep probing (>6 mm), and loss of the cortical plate are likely suggestive of VRF.  相似文献   

19.
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the quality of reporting of full-text articles of dental diagnostic accuracy studies published in eight leading speciality dental journals in relation to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) statement.MethodsThe full articles of all included studies were assessed for their adherence to the 30-item STARD checklist by two researchers independently. A score of 0-2 was attributed to each item. Inter-rater agreement was assessed. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were carried out to evaluate differences in reporting qualities between journals and whether certain variables influenced reporting qualities.ResultsA total of 145 articles were identified. Full-article STARD checklist items relating to methodology and results were poorly reported. The overall mean quality score for full articles was 28.75. Articles published in the Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery obtained the highest quality score. In the multivariate analysis, articles published in the Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery had significantly higher reporting quality scores than those published in the European Journal of Orthodontics (β = ?6.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: ?11.62, ?2.30, P < .05), the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (β = ?8.01, 95% CI: ?14.60, ?1.41, P < .05) and Oral Diseases (β = ?6.72, 95% CI: ?11.57, ?1.86, P < .05). Reporting quality improved each year (P < .028).ConclusionAdherence of full articles to the STARD is suboptimal in dental journals.  相似文献   

20.
《Journal of endodontics》2023,49(5):549-558
BackgroundAn additional canal found in the mandibular first molar (M1M) is the middle mesial canal (MMC), which is often missed during root canal treatment. In this study, the prevalence of MMC in M1M on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images was evaluated in 15 countries, along with the effect of some demographic factors on its prevalence.MethodsDeidentified CBCT images were scanned retrospectively, and the ones including bilateral M1Ms were included in the study. A written and video instruction program explaining the protocol to be followed step-by-step was provided to all observers to calibrate them. The CBCT imaging screening procedure consisted of evaluating three planes (coronal, sagittal, and axial) after a 3-dimensional alignment of the long axis of the root(s). The presence of an MMC in M1Ms (yes/no) was identified and recorded.ResultsIn total, 6304 CBCTs, representing 12,608 M1Ms, were evaluated. A significant difference was found between countries (P < .05). MMC prevalence ranged from 1% to 23%, and the overall prevalence was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5%–9%). No significant differences were found between the left and right M1M (odds ratio = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.27; P > .05) or between genders (odds ratio= 1.07, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.27; P > .05). As for the age groups, no significant differences were found (P > .05).ConclusionsThe prevalence of MMC varies by ethnicity, but it is generally estimated at 7% worldwide. Physicians must pay close attention to the presence of MMC in M1M, especially for opposite M1Ms, due to the prevalence of MMC being significantly bilateral.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号