French pre-hospital trauma triage criteria:Does the “prehospital resuscitation” criterion provide additional benefit in triage?

AIM: To evaluate the performance of the specific French Vittel “Pre-Hospital (PH) resuscitation” criteria in selecting polytrauma patients during the pre-hospital stage and its potential to increase the positive predictive value (PPV) of pre-hospital trauma triage.METHODS: This was a monocentric prospective cohort study of injured adults transported by emergency medical service to a trauma center. Patients who met any of the field trauma triage criteria were considered “triage positive”. Hospital data was statistically linked to pre-hospital records. The primary outcome of defining a “major trauma patient” was Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 16.RESULTS: There were a total of 200 injured patients evaluated over a 2 years period who met at least 1 triage criterion. The number of false positives was 64 patients (ISS < 16). The PPV was 68%. The sensitivity and the negative predictive value could not be evaluated in this study since it only included patients with positive Vittel criteria. The criterion of “PH resuscitation” was present for 64 patients (32%), but 10 of them had an ISS < 16. This was statistically significant in correlation with the severity of the trauma in univariate analysis (OR = 7.2; P = 0.005; 95%CI: 1.6-31.6). However, despite this correlation the overall PPV was not significantly increased by the use of the criterion “PH resuscitation” (68% vs 67.8%).CONCLUSION: The criterion of “pre-hospital resuscitation” was statistically significant with the severity of the trauma, but did not increase the PPV. The use of “pre-hospital resuscitation” criterion could be re-considered if these results are confirmed by larger studies.     

Emergency department triage: Is there a link between nurses’ personal characteristics and accuracy in triage decisions?

INTRODUCTION: A common task of registered nurses is to perform emergency department triage, often using an especially designed triage scale in their assessment. However, little information is available about the factors that promote the quality of these decisions. This study investigated personal characteristics of registered nurses and the accuracy in their acuity ratings of patient scenarios. METHODS: Using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), 423 registered nurses from 48 (62%) Swedish emergency departments individually triaged 18 patient scenarios. RESULTS: The registered nurses' percentage of accurate acuity ratings was 58%, with a range from 22% to 89% accurate acuity ratings per registered nurse. In total, 60.3% of the registered nurses accurately triaged the scenarios in 50-69% of the cases. No relationship was found between personal characteristics of the registered nurses and their ability to triage. DISCUSSION: The lack of a relationship between personal characteristics of registered nurses and their ability to triage suggests that there might be intrapersonal characteristics, particularly the decision-making strategies used which can partly explain this dispersion. Future research that focuses on decision-making is likely to contribute in identifying and describing essential nursing characteristics for successful emergency department triage.     

Are triage questions sufficient to assign fall risk precautions in the ED?

Objectives

The American College of Emergency Physicians Geriatric Emergency Department (ED) Guidelines and the Center for Disease Control recommend that older adults be assessed for risk of falls. The standard ED assessment is a verbal query of fall risk factors, which may be inadequate. We hypothesized that the addition of a functional balance test endorsed by the Center for Disease Control Stop Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries Falls Prevention Guidelines, the 4-Stage Balance Test (4SBT), would improve the detection of patients at risk for falls.

Doctor at triage – Effect on waiting time and patient satisfaction in a Jamaican hospital

IntroductionWaiting time in the Emergency Departments is a major source of patient dissatisfaction in hospitals. Triage attempts to have the most critically ill patients seen first with an overall reduction in waiting time. Triage teams may include specially trained nurses or alternatively a specialist physician. The aim of this study was to determine if inclusion of a specialist physician on the triage team at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) in Kingston Jamaica reduced waiting time and improved patient satisfaction.MethodsA prospective, cross sectional survey of ambulatory care patients was undertaken in 2006. Triage was completed by a team consisting of a doctor and two nurses during the first week and by nurses only during the second week.ResultsThe study showed that there was no significant difference in the length of time patients spent in the emergency department based on whether or not they were triaged by a physician led team or by a team of nurses only. Type of triage team did not affect the level of patient satisfaction. Waiting time was significantly influenced by factors which came into play after triage such as the wait for X-ray and laboratory services.ConclusionsThere appears to be no reduction in waiting times experienced by patients at the UHWI emergency department as a result of inclusion of a specialist emergency physician in the triage process. This suggests that specialist emergency department nurses are adequately trained in triage, and that delays in the triage process at UHWI are due to other factors.     

Do emergency nurses' triage decisions predict differences in admission or discharge diagnoses for acute coronary syndromes?

Coronary heart disease is the number 1 killer of adults in the United States, affecting 1 in 5 men and women. However, women are more likely than men to die after an acute coronary event and are less likely to receive prompt or aggressive treatment. Few studies have examined the role of emergency nurses' triage decisions in these disparities, even though nurses often determine initial patient priority and urgency status for emergency cardiac evaluation and treatment. The purpose of this prospective study was to examine if nurses' initial triage decisions could predict admission or discharge diagnoses for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). A total of 108 nurses' triage decisions made by 13 nurses were examined. There were no differences in nurses' triage decisions based on patient gender, race, or age. By multivariate analysis, chest pain, history of coronary heart disease, history of myocardial infarction, and smoking were predictive of an ACS decision. Overall, accuracy for predicting admission diagnosis was poor. Sensitivity and specificity were 57% and 59%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 68% and a negative predictive value of 56%. It was similarly poor for predicting discharge diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity for discharge diagnosis were 55% and 69%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 17% and a negative predictive value of 93%. Findings indicate limitations in the ability of nurses' triage decisions to predict admission and discharge diagnoses for ACS.     

Effectiveness of prehospital trauma triage systems in selecting severely injured patients: Is comparative analysis possible?

Introduction

In an optimal trauma system, prehospital trauma triage ensures transport of the right patient to the right hospital. Incorrect triage results in undertriage and overtriage. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate and compare prehospital trauma triage system quality worldwide and determine effectiveness in terms of undertriage and overtriage for trauma patients.

Can emergency department triage nurses predict patients' dispositions?

Early recognition of inpatient bed requirements might be helpful in expediting the admission process through the emergency department (ED). With this in mind, we asked whether ED triage nurses could accurately predict patients' in-hospital dispositions. A prediction was recorded for 521 ED patients, of whom 107 (20.5%) were ultimately admitted to the hospital. Nurses correctly anticipated 66 of 107 hospital admissions (sensitivity = 61.7%, PPV = 61.7%). With respect to predicting specific levels of inpatient care, nurses correctly anticipated 17 of 45 floor admissions (sensitivity = 37.8%, PPV = 34.7%), 14 of 33 step-down/monitored unit admissions (sensitivity = 42.4%, PPV = 48.3%), and 12 of 24 intensive care unit admissions (sensitivity = 50.0%, PPV = 66.7%). Lacking in sensitivity and positive predictive value, particularly with regard to specific levels of inpatient care, triage nurses' predictions may have limited potential to expedite the admission process.     

Continuity matters: Examining the ‘information gap’ in transfer from Residential Aged Care,ambulance to emergency triage in southern Tasmania

BackgroundTransfer of older people from Residential Aged Care Facilities to Emergency Departments requires multiple comprehensive handovers across different services. Significant information gaps exist in transferred information despite calls for standards.AimTo investigate: (1) presence of minimum standard elements in the transfer text written by RACF nurses, paramedics and ED triage nurses, and (2) the transfer documentation used by services.MethodsWe analysed retrospective cross-sectional transfer narratives from the digital medical record system of an Australian tertiary referral hospital using the mnemonic SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment Recommendation) as the measure of comprehensiveness. Transfer documents from 3 groups were also reviewed.FindingsInclusion of elements from SBAR was inconsistent across transfer. Rather, the written narratives focused on concerns relevant to the immediate priority, the type of information imposed by the document(s) in use, and clinical role of the author.ConclusionTransfer documentation from Residential Aged Care nurses, paramedics and ED triage nurses do not contain comprehensive information of older persons complex conditions. Better communication between non-affiliated organisations is needed to improve timely appropriate care for RACF residents.     

Does the Manchester triage system detect the critically ill?

BACKGROUND: The Manchester triage system (MTS) is now widely used in UK accident and emergency (A&E) departments. No clinical outcome studies have yet been published to validate the system. Safety of triage systems is related to the ability to detect the critically ill, which has to be balanced with resource implications of overtriage. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the MTS can reliably detect those subsequently needing admission to critical care areas. METHODS: Analysis of emergency admissions to critical care areas and comparison with original A&E triage code by a nurse using the MTS at time of presentation. Retrospective coding of all cases according to the MTS by experts and case analysis to determine whether any non-urgent coding was due to the system or to incorrect coding. RESULTS: Sixty one (67%) of the patients admitted to a critical care area were given triage category 1 or 2 (that is, to be seen within 10 minutes of arrival). Eighteen cases given lower priority were due to incorrect coding by the triage nurse. Six cases were correctly coded by the MTS, of which five deteriorated after arrival in the A&E department. Only one case was critically ill on arrival and yet was coded as able to wait for up to one hour. CONCLUSIONS: The MTS is a sensitive tool for detecting those who subsequently need critical care and are ill on arrival in the A&E department. It did fail to detect some whom deteriorated after arrival in A&E. Most errors were due to training problems rather than the system of triage. Analysis of critically ill patients allows easy audit of sensitivity of the MTS but cannot be used to calculate specificity.     

Frozen with Fear? Attentional Mechanisms in Children with Selective Mutism

Cognitive Therapy and Research - Children with selective mutism (SM) are consistently unable to speak in certain social situations. Due to an overlap between SM and social anxiety disorder (SAD) in...