首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 145 毫秒
1.
目的追踪随访1例抗-HCV阴性、HCV RNA阳性的献血者,观察其血清学何时发生阳性转换并确认其"窗口期"。方法采用罗氏Cobas’s201系统和科华核酸筛查系统对ELISA检测HBs Ag、抗-HCV和抗-HIV1/2为阴性的无偿献血者标本,进行HBV/HCV/HIV联合核酸定性检测。先进行混样检测,再对阳性的混合标本进行单检。对ELISA阴性、NAT阳性的献血者再进行追踪随访。结果从ELISA筛查阴性的247 936份标本中检出125例(1/1 983)NAT阳性标本,其中有1例抗-HCV阴性、HCV RNA阳性的献血者,追踪随访之后发现第6周时献血者抗-HCV完全转为阳性。结论 NAT应用于献血者血液筛查有助于缩短HCV检出"窗口期",有效地阻断了丙肝"窗口期"感染的血液传播。开展NAT在保障临床输血安全方面有重要的意义,应积极推广。  相似文献   

2.
目的应用核酸扩增检测(Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing,NAT)技术对人类免疫缺陷病毒(human im-munodeficiency virus,HIV)酶联免疫吸附测定(Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay,ELISA)合格的献血者血液标本进行核酸检测,探讨NAT技术对缩短ELISA检测HIV感染"窗口期"的作用。方法对献血者血液标本进行HIV抗原抗体、乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原、丙型肝炎病毒抗体、梅毒螺旋体抗体2遍ELISA检测,将检测结果合格的血液标本进行核酸检测。结果在177229例ELISA检测合格的献血者标本中发现HBV DNA阳性献血者24例,HIV-1RNA阳性献血者1例,未发现HCV RNA阳性献血者。对HIV-1RNA阳性献血者追踪调查并在献血后的d4、d11、d16、d37采样检测,d4病毒载量由献血时的4.61×102copy/ml上升至5.10×104copy/ml,P24抗原和抗体仍为阴性;d11P24抗原检测阳性,HIV抗体检测仍为阴性。d16HIV抗体检测结果阳性,免疫印迹法(Western blot,WB)确证试验结果为HIV抗体不确定;d37WB确证试验结果为HIV-1抗体阳性。结论 HIV-1RNA阳性献血者,经追踪调查及对不同时间采集的标本采用各种方法学检测,证实该献血者为HIV感染早期ELISA法漏检的"窗口期"献血者。因此,NAT检测技术比ELISA检测能更进一步地缩短HIV检测的"窗口期"。  相似文献   

3.
目的应用NAT技术对德宏地区献血标本进行病毒核酸检测,探讨NAT技术对缩短ELISA法检测HIV、HBV和HCV"窗口期"、防范病毒变异与静默感染漏检的作用。方法采用ELISA和NAT检测技术同步对献血标本分别进行HBsAg、抗-HCV、抗-HIV和HBV DNA、HCV RNA、HIV-1RNA检测,对ELISA方法检测阴性NAT检测阳性的献血者进行追踪。结果 14 233例ELISA检测阴性献血者标本中NAT联检阳性14例,鉴别试验HBV DNA阳性12例,未能鉴别病毒种类2例,未检出HIV-1RNA、HCV RNA阳性。对HBV DNA阳性献血者进行1~3次追踪确认,发现1例为HBV"窗口期"感染,11例为OBI感染。结论血站实施病毒NAT筛检能进一步提高血液的安全性。  相似文献   

4.
应用核酸扩增技术对血液中HBV、HCV和HIV-1检测   总被引:18,自引:7,他引:11  
目的探讨采用核酸扩增技术(NAT)对血液进行HCV、HBV和HIV1核酸检测的可行性。方法采用手工法将血清学检测HBsAg、抗HCV、抗HIV1/2和TPHA呈阴性,以及ALT<40U的血浆标本进行48份×50μl混合;超速离心浓缩病毒后提取病毒核酸,采用RocheCOBASAmplicor分析系统对微量血浆混合标本进行HBVDNA、HCVRNA和HIV1RNA的检测;阳性反应的混合标本进行交叉混合和单份确认检测。结果18621份血清学检测合格的血液中,发现5份HBsAg阴性、HBVDNA呈阳性的血液,阳性率为0.027%(5/18621)。经进一步随访6~20月显示,2名献血者为HBV低水平感染,1例为HBV血清转换窗口期感染。结论NAT检测能够发现HBV低水平和窗口期感染的标本。  相似文献   

5.
目的 评估大连地区HBV-DNA检测对于输血安全的重要性.方法 对无偿献血者的血液标本进行血清学检测(HBsAg、HCV抗体、HIV抗原/抗体、梅毒特异性抗体、谷丙转氨酶和血型),同时进行HBV、HCV、HIV的三联检核酸检测(NAT);对ELISA(-)NAT(+)的标本采用电化学发光法进行HBV血清标志物补充试验,同时对献血者进行追踪检测.结果 22416份无偿献血者样本发现35例ELISA(+)NAT(+)、3例ELISA(+)NAT(-)、12例ELISA(-)NAT(+).跟踪5位ELISA(-)NAT(+)的献血者,1例可能是免疫“窗口期”;其余4例可能是OBI.结论 核酸血液筛查可大大提高血液安全性,对提高HBsAg阴性血液标本中HBV感染检出率具有重要价值;但核酸与血清学二者检测结果存在不一致,二者对于降低输血传播HBV.  相似文献   

6.
我国5城市合格献血者血液HIV及HCV残余风险研究   总被引:14,自引:6,他引:8  
目的研究我国献血者血液HIV及HCV残余风险;评估我国开展血液核酸检测(NAT)的可行性和必要性。方法采集乌鲁木齐、昆明、北京、广州、杭州5城市献血者血样,用Chiron Procleix HIV-1/HCV Assay血液核酸检测体系,对各项血清学筛查均合格的89 467份血液作16人份混合血样NAT检测,凡筛查不合格血样再作单人份检测;对于抗-HCV阴性而HCV RNA NAT阳性者,用备用管作抗-HCV、ALT、及HCV RNA NAT复检。结果共检出HCV RNA NAT阳性但抗-HCV EIA阴性标本3例,未检出HIV RNA NAT阳性但抗-HIV EIA阴性标本;在87 034份血清学筛查合格献血者中,检出HCV NAT阳性2例,其中1例复检ALT为254U/L,未检出HIVNAT阳性;在2 613份血清学筛查不合格者中,检出1例HCV NAT阳性但抗-HCV EIA阴性标本,该献血者抗-HIV阳性、ALT 372U/L;未检出HIV NAT阳性但抗-HIV EIA阴性的标本。结论血清学筛查使我国的血液安全性已有相当高的保障;而NAT技术可进一步提高血液的安全性,但在我国是否可应用于常规血液筛查,需考虑成本与效益比。此外,ALT筛查对排除抗-HCV漏检血液仍有一定的作用。  相似文献   

7.
目的病毒核酸检测技术(Nucleic Acid Technology,NAT)应用于献血者血液筛查,探讨缩短病毒检测"窗口期"的检测方法,保障临床输血安全。方法将2011年9月至2012年5月我站14203例无偿献血标本经血清学筛查合格的标本进行HBV、HCV和HIV三项联合NAT检测,并对NAT筛查阳性标本做确证试验。结果 HBsAg、抗HCV、抗HIV ELISA检测均为阴性的血液标本13843例,NAT共检出阳性25例,阳性率为0.18%。其中HIV-DNA检出1例,HBV-DNA检出24例。结论核酸检测技术应用于献血者血液筛查中,有效地缩短了病毒检出"窗口期",有力地保障了临床输血安全。  相似文献   

8.
目的 建立结合多重反转录巢式PCR技术检测HIV RNA的小型集合NAT,用于MSM人群急性感染的筛查诊断.方法 利用2008年10月至2009年3月期间从3名HIV窗口期感染者、30名HIV慢性感染者、97名健康人采集冻存的EDTA抗凝血浆建立小型集合NAT.将10份待测标本混合组成1个集合,离心富集病毒,提取RNA;针对HXB2的nt5783-nt6228和nt1235-nt2012区分别设计2对引物;采用多重RT-PCR、巢式PCR扩增2个目标区的核酸片段,对结果阳性的集合中标本进一步分别检测.确定小型集合NAT的灵敏度,并进行验证.应用建立的方法对1 005份与上述标本同一时期收集的MSM人群的HIV抗体阴性血浆进行检测.结果 (1)成功扩增出目标区的2条特异性片段,灵敏度为162拷贝/ml;(2)对3份HIV窗口期感染者标本用小型集合NAT方法盲法验证的结果和预期一致;(3)用多重RT-PCR和巢式PCR对30份HIV抗体阳性标本检测,阳性率100%(30/30);(4)发现1 005份血浆标本中有1份为HIV RNA阳性,追踪随访发现HIV-1抗体转阳.结论 本研究中建立多引物小型集合RT-PCR、巢式PCR结合的小型集合NAT的敏感性好,可用于MSM人群HIVG感染窗口期筛查检测.  相似文献   

9.
目的评估核酸检测技术(NAT)应用于献血者血液筛查的必要性和可行性。方法采用美国罗氏诊断公司cobas s 201系统对2010年8月~2011年12月血站ELISA检测合格的献血者79 414人份血液标本进行HIVRNA-1,-2、HCV RNA和HBV DNA 3项联合核酸检测(cobas TaqScreen MPX试剂),先对6人份标本混样进行NAT,如为阴性,则直接出具结果,如出现阳性结果,再进行拆分检测;对NAT检测反应性标本进行分项确证试验。结果ELISA法共检测了98 935人份标本,抗-HIV、抗-HCV、HBsAg均为阴性的合格血液共96 923份;对79 414人份血液标本NAT共检出阳性194例,阳性率为0.24%;分项检测发现127例阳性标本,病毒类型均为HBV DNA,未检测出HCV RNA和HIV RNA,阳性检出率为65.46%(127/194)。结论 NAT能在ELISA检测阴性的献血者血液标本中筛查到HIV RNA-1,-2、HCV RNA和HBV DNA反应性标本,常规开展NAT能进一步提高血液及输血安全。  相似文献   

10.
目的探讨核酸检测(NAT)用于盐城地区献血者血液筛查的应用价值。方法选取2011年8月-2013年4月共计48 754例经EIA法(以下简称"EIA")检测双试剂阴性或单试剂阴性的无偿献血者,使用达安核酸检测系统进行核酸检测,检测呈阳性的标本分别送卫生部临检中心、江苏省血液中心、盐城市疾控中心进行确认。HBV DNA阳性标本送检作进一步抗-HBs、HBe Ag、抗-HBe和抗-HBc检测。结果 48 754人份血液标本中,NAT共检出阳性24例,阳性检出率为0.05%,经确认,其中HIV RNA阳性的窗口期标本1例,HBV DNA阳性11例。结论 NAT技术应用于献血者血液筛查,可以缩短输血性HIV、HBV、HCV病毒检测的"窗口期",提高输血安全。  相似文献   

11.
BACKGROUND: The implementation of NAT technologies for HIV screening has further reduced the diagnostic window in recent HIV infection. There is still a debate regarding the cost effectiveness of genomic screening of blood donations for transfusion-transmitted viruses (HBV, HCV, HIV). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Since October 2001, at the Transfusion Service of Verona, single-donation NAT testing for HCV and HIV-1 (Procleix TMA HIV-1/HCV Assay) of all blood donations has been performed. CASE REPORT: A case of acute HIV-1 infection detected by HIV NAT in a repeat blood donor who donated during the preseroconversion window period is reported. All blood components donated were discarded, and the donor started antiretroviral therapy 2 weeks after blood donation. HIV-1 p24 antigen was still negative 10 days after the HIV-1 RNA-positive blood donation. Seroconversion was documented by Day 41 after donation. CONCLUSION: This case report testifies that HIV NAT screening of blood donation is effective in preventing the transmission of HIV infection through blood components.  相似文献   

12.
13.
BACKGROUND: An HIV-1 and HCV NAT blood screening assay (Procleix HIV-1/HCV, Gen-Probe, Inc.) simultaneously detecting HIV-1 and HCV RNA) has been implemented. Donor plasma samples reactive in the Procleix HIV-1/HCV assay are tested with the HIV-1 and HCV discriminatory assays to resolve whether HIV-1 RNA, HCV RNA, or both are present. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To determine the specificity of the Procleix HIV-1/HCV assay, data were analyzed for samples from 192,288 donations, tested in 16-member pools. To determine sensitivity, data were analyzed for 2014 commercial samples known to contain HIV-1, HCV, or both, as well as 10 HIV-1 and 10 HCV commercial seroconversion panels. RESULTS: The specificity of the Procleix HIV-1/HCV assay was 99.7 percent. The HIV-1 and HCV discriminatory assays showed similar specificity. The sensitivity of the Procleix HIV-1/HCV assay was 99.9, 99.6, and 100 percent, respectively, for samples containing HIV-1, HCV, or both. The Procleix discriminatory assays were comparably sensitive. The Procleix discriminatory assays detected all tested samples of known HIV-1 subtype or HCV genotype. Procleix HIV-1/HCV testing of seroconversion panels showed that the median times to a positive reaction for HIV-1 and HCV were reduced by 3 and 25 days, respectively, compared to serologic tests. CONCLUSION: These studies support the use of the Procleix HIV-1/HCV assay for routine blood donor screening.  相似文献   

14.
BACKGROUND: A multi-blood center study was conducted to evaluate a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) multiplex nucleic acid testing (NAT) donor screening test and to determine the residual risk for HIV-1 and HCV infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A commercially available HIV-1 and HCV assay (Procleix, Chiron Corp.) was used for simultaneous detection of HIV-1 RNA and HCV RNA on 89,647 unlinked donor samples. NAT was performed with pools of 16 samples that had passed all routine screening tests. Single-donor NAT was performed for samples that had been disqualified by any reactive screening test result(s). Anti-HCV (Ortho third-generation HCV enzyme immunoassay [EIA]), alanine aminotransferase, and HCV NAT (Roche COBAS Amplicor HCV test) confirmatory tests were used for HCV EIA-nonreactive, HCV NAT-reactive samples. RESULTS: Three HCV NAT yield cases and no HIV-1 yield cases were detected. The yield rate for HCV NAT was 3.4 per 10(5) (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.7-9.8). The estimated incidence rate for HCV is 24.2 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI, 3.4-88.0). If minipool NAT is added to routine donor screening, the residual risk for HCV is estimated to be reduced to 1 in 20.4x10(4) (95% CI, 1 in 5.2x10(4)-1 in 165.5x10(4)). CONCLUSION: The residual risk for transfusion-transmitted HCV infection is still relatively high in China. Incorporating NAT technology into blood donor screening would be estimated to reduce the residual risk of HCV infections eightfold over current EIA screening.  相似文献   

15.
16.
BACKGROUND: Blood donations collected at the National Blood Center, the Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, in 2007 were tested by nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) using the Chiron TIGRIS/Procleix Ultrio test and the Roche cobas s 201/cobas TaqScreen multiplex (MPX) test.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The sensitivity, specificity, and robustness were determined by testing 486,676 seronegative blood donations. Samples from each day of collection were divided into two sets; the odd-numbered samples were tested individually on the TIGRIS and the even-numbered samples were tested in pools of 6 on the cobas s 201. The status of reactive samples was confirmed by duplicate testing of samples from the plasma bag to calculate the test specificity. Reactive samples were tested on the alternate system and followed up.
RESULTS: The analytical sensitivity of both systems met the 95% limits of detection claimed by the respective package inserts. No cross contamination was seen with either system. Test specificity was 99.93 and 99.90% for the Procleix Ultrio and cobas TaqScreen tests, respectively. The NAT yield rates for human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 (HIV-1), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) were 1:97,000, 1:490,000, and 1:2800, respectively. Several occult HBV donors, the majority of whom were detected by both tests, were also identified. The HIV-1 and HCV window cases were detected with both tests.
CONCLUSION: The performances of the systems and tests indicated that both were acceptable for routine NAT by the National Blood Center, the Thai Red Cross Society. However, the Procleix Ultrio test appeared to be less sensitive than the cobas TaqScreen test for HBV.  相似文献   

17.
病毒核酸检测在献血者血液筛查中的应用   总被引:16,自引:1,他引:15  
目的 建立献血者血液混合核酸检测方法 ,调查北京现有检测体系下血液的残余风险度 ,评估核酸检测 (NAT)的必要性和可行性。方法 用世界卫生组织标准品对国产丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和人免疫缺陷病毒 (HIV)荧光 聚合酶链反应核酸扩增检测试剂进行灵敏度、重复性和精密度试验 ;对 2 0 0 2年 2~ 10月 34373份常规血清学检测 (ALT、HBsAg、抗 HCV、抗 HIV、梅毒抗体 )合格的献血者血样进行HCVRNA和HIV 1RNA核酸扩增分析。采取 2 4人份混合血样测定 ,超离心浓缩病毒 ,Roche核酸提取柱提取病毒核酸。结果 扩增系统能 10 0 %检出 5 0IU/mlHCV及 5 0IU/mlHIV 1标准品核酸 (n =16 ) ;常规血清学检测合格的献血者血液中 ,没有检出HCV或HIVNAT阳性。结论 该核酸检测体系适用于献血者血液病毒筛查 ;北京市血液的病毒安全性已有相当高的保障。为更准确地评估NAT检测项目的可行性和必要性 ,检测标本量尚待增加。  相似文献   

18.
献血者HBV、HCV、HIV的单人份核酸检测   总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5  
目的应用Procleix ULTRIO Assay和Procleix TIGRIS System进行献血者单人份病毒核酸检测(ID-NAT),以了解ELISA法筛查的HBV、HCV、HIV漏检率,同时对ID-NAT和汇集NAT(MP-NAT)模式进行比较。方法在进行2次ELISA法筛查的同时,应用ULTRIO试剂在TIGRIS系统上行ID-NAT检测,对有活性的标本再分别进行HBV、HCV、HIV的鉴别测定,对ID-NAT阳性标本再进行8个(MP-8-NAT)和16个(MP-16-NAT)样品的模拟混样检测。结果在10064名无偿献血者中,共检出10例ELISA法阴性、ID-NAT阳性标本,ELISA法筛查漏检率为0.99‰,该10例标本经鉴别实验确定为HBV DNA阳性;共检出28例ELISA法阳性、ID-NAT阳性标本,其中HCV6例、HBV22例。将28例ELISA法阳性、ID-NAT阳性及10例ELISA法阴性、ID-NAT阳性标本进行8个、16个样品模拟汇集,结果 MP-8-NAT、MP-16-NAT的阳性检出率分别下降为78.6%、75.0%和30.0%、20.0%。结论 2次ELISA法血清学筛查模式存在较高的HBV漏检;ID-NAT的灵敏度高于MP-NAT,对于ELISA法阴性、ID-NAT阳性标本,MP-NAT存在很高的漏检率。  相似文献   

19.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号