Development of a performance standard for physiotherapists delivering exercise and mobilisation to the critically ill: A modified Delphi consensus study

BackgroundThe provision of early mobilisation to critically ill patients has the potential to improve long term outcomes, but, is complex to deliver. There is minimal literature detailing the training and expertise required to deliver these interventions safely and effectively.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the key elements of a performance standard for assessment of physiotherapists delivering exercise and mobilisation interventions to the critically ill.MethodThis is a modified eDelphi expert consensus study. Fifty-one physiotherapists from Australia and New Zealand with relevant clinical, educational, or research experience were included on the expert panel. Background information and the initial pool of items were developed from review of relevant literature. Five survey rounds were administered across two study phases to determine the elements, performance criteria, and assessment scale of the performance standard. Items were modified, amalgamated, and added based upon panel comments.ResultsConsensus was achieved for 69 mandatory, and two supplementary performance criteria which were arranged under 15 elements encompassing knowledge, assessment, analysis, intervention, and professional behaviours. A 3-point rating scale was selected to assess item achievement and global performance.ConclusionBinational expert consensus was reached to define the assessment criteria for physiotherapists delivering exercise and mobilisation interventions to the critically ill. This standard can be utilised in clinical, educational, and research practice environments to guide training, assessment, and skill recognition in critical care physiotherapy.     

Handover and transport of critically ill children: An integrative review

BackgroundThe handover and transport of critically ill pediatric patients requires communication amongst multiple disciplines. Poor communication is a leading cause of sentinel events and human factors affect handover and transport.ObjectivesTo synthesize published data on pediatric handover and transport and identify gaps to provide direction for future investigation.MethodsIntegrative literature review.ResultsForty research studies were reviewed and revealed the following themes: risk for patient complications, standardized communication, and specialized teams and teamwork were associated with improved outcomes. No articles were identified regarding transportation of critically ill pediatric patients from the emergency room to the intensive care unit. There was a knowledge gap in best practices in handover and transport within the unique subsets of the pediatric population including neonate, toddler, school-aged, and adolescents.ConclusionsResearch supported a combined approach of specialized teams using standardized communication in the handover and transport of the pediatric patient to improve outcomes. Further study is warranted on interprofessional (team to team) handover practices, select subsets of the pediatric population, and the handover and transport of critically ill patients from the emergency room to the intensive care unit.     

Nursing the artificial airway patient

Abstract

Nursing the artificial airway patient presents many challenges. This article covers identifying patients at risk from airway obstruction who may benefit from an artificial airway and outlines the key considerations of managing these patients, including types of tracheostomy tubes, stoma site care, airway hydration and airway suctioning. Finally, potential complications and their management are considered in order to maximise successful outcomes in these patients.     

Definition,Categorization, and Terminology of Episodic Breathlessness: Consensus by an International Delphi Survey

ContextEpisodic breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom in patients with advanced disease. Still, it is not yet clearly defined.ObjectivesThe aim of this work was to develop an international definition, categorization, and terminology of episodic breathlessness.MethodsAn online Delphi survey was conducted with international breathlessness experts. We used a structured questionnaire to identify specific aspects and reach agreement on a definition, categorization, and terminology (five-point Likert scale). Consensus was defined in advance as ≥70% agreement.ResultsThirty-one of 68 (45.6%), 29 of 67 (43.3%), and 33 of 67 (49.3%) experts responded in the first, second, and third rounds, respectively. Participants were 20–79 years old, about 60% male, and more than 75% rated their own breathlessness expertise as moderate to high. After three rounds, consensus was reached on a definition, categorization, and terminology (84.4%, 96.3%, and 92.9% agreement). The final definition includes general and qualitative aspects of the symptom, for example, time-limited severe worsening of intensity or unpleasantness of breathlessness in the patient's perception. Categories are predictable or unpredictable, depending on whether any triggers can be identified.ConclusionThere is high agreement on clinical and operational aspects of episodic breathlessness in advanced disease among international experts. The consented definition and categorization may serve as a catalyst for clinical and basic research to improve symptom control and patients' quality of life.     

Referral communication for pediatric intensive care unit admission and the diagnosis of critically ill children: A pilot ethnography

PurposeThe effect of communication between referring and accepting clinicians during patient transitions to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) on diagnostic quality is largely unknown. This pilot study aims to determine the feasibility of using focused ethnography to understand the relationship between referral communication and the diagnostic process for critically ill children.Materials and methodsWe conducted focused ethnography in an academic tertiary referral PICU by directly observing the referral and admission of 3 non-electively admitted children 0–17 years old. We also conducted 21 semi-structured interviews of their parents and admitting PICU staff (intensivists, fellows/residents, medical students, nurses, and respiratory therapists) and reviewed their medical records post-discharge.ResultsPerforming focused ethnography in a busy PICU is feasible. We identified three areas for additional exploration: (1) how information transfer affects the PICU diagnostic process; (2) how uncertainty in patient assessment affects the decision to transfer to the PICU; and (3) how the PICU team's expectations are influenced by referral communication.ConclusionsFocused ethnography in the PICU is feasible to investigate relationships between clinician referral communication and the diagnostic process for critically ill children.     

Factors contributing to poor sleep in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

ObjectiveTo examine the causes of poor sleep in critically ill patients from nurses’ experiences.Review methodologyA meta-synthesis following the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research statement was conducted. Articles were searched systematically in the CINAHL, MEDLINE and Embase databases up to January 2020. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two authors working independently. Included articles were critically evaluated by both authors using the Critical Appraisal Screening Programme tool.FindingsThe meta-synthesis resulted in four analytical themes: (1) Inherent factors of critical illness, (2) Lack of implementation of evidence-based practice, (3) Lack of relational collaboration, (4) Hospital organisation and culture.ConclusionThis literature review indicates that promoting critically ill patients' sleep is difficult. Evidence-based interventions should be implemented into practice in order for nurses to be able to meet the patients' needs and improve sleep. Furthermore, the team surrounding the patient must have support from the health care organisation, and a culture change is necessary to improve communication between them to reach a shared goal to improve critically ill patients' sleep.     

Handover from operating theatre to the intensive care unit: A quality improvement study

BackgroundTransitioning a patient from the operating theatre (OT) to the intensive care unit (ICU) is a dynamic and complex process. Handover of the critically ill postoperative patient can contribute to procedural and communication errors. Standardised protocols are means for structuring and improving handover content. Both have been shown to be effective in reducing information omission and improve communication during this transition period.ObjectivesThe aim of this uncontrolled before and after study was to improve handover processes and communication about the care for critically ill patients transferred from OT to ICU.MethodsThirty-two OT to ICU handovers (16 before and 16 after implementation) were observed. Using a structured tool, we documented who was present, participated in, and initiated handover during ICU admission. Where and when handover was performed, information provided, distractions and interruptions, and handover duration were also recorded. Unstructured field notes and diagrams provided information on staff interaction. Following implementation, semistructured interviews with 27 participants were conducted to understand participants' perceptions of intervention acceptability and to determine factors influencing intervention implementation and spread.FindingsFollowing implementation, a “hands-off” approach was observed with fewer technical tasks completed during handover (43.8% before implementation vs 12.5% after implementation) without an increase in handover time. A single, multidisciplinary handover most often led by the anaesthetist was observed after implementation. Despite these improvements, the use of the physical checklist was not observed in practice, and an situation, background, assessment, recommendation (SBAR) format was not followed. Anaesthetists leading the handover did not view the handover checklist as being beneficial to their practice although some nurses were observed to use the checklist as a prompt for additional information.ConclusionsA single, multidisciplinary handover demonstrated improvement in handover practice despite low uptake of the protocol checklist. Further information is required to inform targeted strategies to improve uptake and sustainability although broader interdisciplinary engagement and commitment may be helpful.     

Shifting focus: A grounded theory of how family members to critically ill patients manage their situation

ObjectivesCritical illness is a life-threatening condition for the patient, which affects their family members as a traumatic experience. Well-known long-term consequences include impact on mental health and health-related quality of life. This study aims to develop a grounded theory to explain pattern of behaviours in family members of critically ill patients cared for in an intensive care unit, addressing the period from when the patient becomes critically ill until recovery at home.Research methodology/designWe used a classic grounded theory to explore the main concern for family members of intensive care patients. Fourteen interviews and seven observations with a total of 21 participants were analysed. Data were collected from February 2019 to June 2021.SettingThree general intensive care units in Sweden, consisting of a university hospital and two county hospitals.FindingsThe theory Shifting focus explains how family members’ main concern, living on hold, is managed. This theory involves different strategies: decoding, sheltering and emotional processing. The theory has three different outcomes: adjusting focus, emotional resigning or remaining in focus.ConclusionFamily members could stand in the shadow of the patients’ critical illness and needs. This emotional adversity is processed through shifting focus from one’s own needs and well-being to the patient’s survival, needs and well-being. This theory can raise awareness of how family members of critically ill patients manage the process from critical illness until return to everyday life at home. Future research focusing on family members’ need for support and information, to reduce stress in everyday life, is needed.Implications for Clinical PracticeHealthcare professionals should support family members in shifting focus by interaction, clear and honest communication, and through mediating hope.     

Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017

Purpose

To propose guidelines based on an expert-panel-derived unified approach to the technical performance, interpretation, and reporting of MRI for baseline and post-treatment staging of rectal carcinoma.

Methods

A consensus-based questionnaire adopted with permission and modified from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists was sent to a 17-member expert panel from the Rectal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology containing 268 question parts. Consensus on an answer was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Answers not reaching consensus (< 70%) were noted.

Results

Consensus was reached for 87% of items from which recommendations regarding patient preparation, technical performance, pulse sequence acquisition, and criteria for MRI assessment at initial staging and restaging exams and for MRI reporting were constructed.

Conclusion

These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidelines for primary and post-treatment staging of rectal cancer using MRI.

     

A multidisciplinary safety briefing for acutely ill and deteriorating patients: A quality improvement project

BackgroundSafety briefings can help promoting situational awareness, interprofessional communication and improve patient safety.Local problemA clinical survey highlighted that 90% of the participants including the medical team and the critical care outreach team nurses perceived the meeting for escalating acutely ill and deteriorating patients during the out-of-hours period (20.00 to 08.00) to have unconstructive and unwelcoming atmosphere with belittling, hostility and unhelpful criticisms. The participants reported that the communication across teams lacked in structure and clear information given; but staff also self-reported lacking confidence in communicating key issues.MethodA quality improvement project with Plan-Do-Study-Act was adopted to design and implement a dedicated multidisciplinary safety briefing with a structured format.ResultsThe multidisciplinary safety briefing was to 90% of clinicians, and it took a median of 10 min to complete. Delayed referrals to the critical care outreach team were reduced by 46%. Positive changes included increased situational awareness and clearer communication across teams. Barriers identified were variable usage and need for face-to-face presence. Considering all the findings and the time constraint during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, we changed to a telephonic safety briefing directly to the team leaders.ConclusionA structured multidisciplinary safety briefing can improve patient safety and support management of deteriorating and acutely ill patients on the wards during the out-of-hours period.     

Open visiting in adult intensive care units – A structured literature review

BackgroundOpen visitation in adult intensive care units report benefits such as reduced frequency and duration of deliriums, improved patient and family satisfaction, and reduced anxiety and depression of family members. ‘Being close’ is one of the most basic and important needs of family members of critically ill patients. Open visitation provides an increased opportunity of being at the bedside with the patient, however, it is not universally embraced by adult intensive care units worldwide.AimTo critically appraise the literature concerning open visitation in adult intensive care units.DesignA structured literature review.MethodThis review was guided by the methodology by Kable et al. (2012). Sixteen articles are included in the review.ResultsDespite the documented benefits, several challenges exist which hinder broad application of open visitation in adult intensive care units.ConclusionThis review acknowledged challenges faced in adopting an open visiting policy in adult intensive care units such as negative staff perceptions and attitudes; patient protection; family and cultural consideration, as well as organisational challenges. The lack of a clear and consistent definition of open visitation is problematic, and strategies are urgently needed to support staff to provide holistic patient- and family-centred care.     

Clinical decision-making in the intensive care unit: A concept analysis

AimTo operationally define clinical decision-making as it relates to intensive care unit nursing.BackgroundClinical decision-making is an intricate cognitive process that is demanding on intensive care nurses due to the severity of their patients’ illnesses, consistent exposure to high-stakes situations, and prevalent patient mortality. When compromised, it can lead to adverse patient events. However, clinical decision-making specific to the intensive care unit is a concept seldom defined in nursing research.DesignConcept analysis.MethodsUsing Walker and Avant’s eight-step method, nursing databases were searched for studies between 1980 and 2022 describing the antecedents, defining attributes, consequences, and empirical referents of clinical decision-making in the intensive setting.FindingsIntensive care unit clinical decision-making is a complex cognitive process in which nurses recognize a clinical problem in their patient and respond promptly by implementing interventions to improve their patient’s rapidly and frequently changing health status to a more favorable condition in an intensive care setting. The defining attributes are: assessment of the patient situation, prompt recognition of cues, efficient comprehension of patient data abnormalities, prior knowledge and experience, prompt response to the clinical problem(s), colleague collaboration, formulation of interventions to treat clinical problem(s), and appraisal of risks/benefits.ConclusionIntensive care unit clinical decision-making is a skill that is different from traditional clinical decision-making in nursing. Prompt action characterizes this concept due to the unstable health status of these patients. More research on this concept is needed to enhance nurse performance and patient outcomes in intensive care.Implications for clinical practiceA definition of this concept opens doors for potential studies on promoting effective decision-making among intensive care nurses. This can improve the safety and outcomes of critically ill patients. Additionally, it generates new questions regarding how nursing schools and hospital orientation programs can promote and develop competent decision-making skills in future intensive care nurses.     

Pain Management in the Cancer Survivor

ObjectivesTo describe assessment and interdisciplinary management of pain in the cancer survivor over the continuum of cancer care.Data SourcesReview of the literature and treatment standards.ConclusionPain remains a primary concern throughout the cancer trajectory across all age groups and diagnoses, emphasizing the need to integrate pain assessment and management across the continuum of cancer survivorship and across care settings. Types of pain, pain patterns, assessment of cancer pain in cancer survivors, current strategies and challenges for management, and effective communication and documentation of the process are described. Communication between and among health care clinicians in a way that effectively articulates the individual patient experience, including documentation in the electronic medical record, requires consistent workflows and terminology. The opioid crisis increases the urgency in effective strategies for interdisciplinary pain assessment and management.Implications for Nursing PracticeOncology clinicians must be able to adequately assess pain, track pain over time, understand and implement a cadre of strategies to manage pain, and effectively pursue any suspicious pain patterns that may indicate recurrence or progression of cancer or other underlying etiologies. The oncology nurse is at the core of patient-clinician communication, critical to effectively describing pain as experienced by the individual patient and continues to play a key role in maintaining consistency of message that is necessary to manage pain over the continuum of cancer survivorship.     

Quality measurement and surveillance platforms in critically ill children: A scoping review

Background/aimThe objective of this study was to describe current surveillance platforms which support routine quality measurement in paediatric critical care.MethodScoping review. The search strategy consisted of a traditional database and grey literature search as well as expert consultation. Surveillance platforms were eligible for inclusion if they collected measures of quality in critically ill children.ResultsThe search strategy identified 21 surveillance platforms, collecting 57 unique outcome (70%), process (23%), and structural (7%) quality measures. Hospital-associated infections were the most commonly collected outcome measure across all platforms (n = 11; 52%). In general, case definitions were not harmonised across platforms, with the exception of nationally mandated hospital-associated infections (e.g., central line–associated blood stream infection). Data collection relied on manual coding. Platforms typically did not provide an evidence-based rationale for measures collected, with no identifiable reports of co-designed, consensus-derived measures or consumer involvement in measure selection or prioritisation.ConclusionsQuality measurement in critically ill children lacks uniformity in definition which limits local and international benchmarking. Current surveillance activities for critically ill children focus heavily on outcome measurement, with process, structural, and patient-reported measures largely overlooked. Long-term outcome measures were not routinely collected. Harmonisation of paediatric intensive care unit quality measures is needed and can be achieved using prioritisation and consensus/co-design methods.