Ultrasound Guidance Versus Electrical Stimulation for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Perineural Catheter Insertion

Objective. Electrical stimulation (ES)‐ and ultrasound‐guided placement techniques have been described for infraclavicular brachial plexus perineural catheters but to our knowledge have never been previously compared in a randomized fashion, leaving the optimal method undetermined. We tested the hypothesis that infraclavicular catheters placed via ultrasound guidance alone require less time for placement and produce equivalent results compared with catheters placed solely via ES. Methods. Preoperatively, patients receiving an infraclavicular perineural catheter for distal upper extremity surgery were randomly assigned to either ES with a stimulating catheter or ultrasound guidance with a nonstimulating catheter. The primary outcome was the catheter insertion duration (minutes) starting when the ultrasound transducer (ultrasound group) or catheter placement needle (stimulation group) first touched the patient and ending when the catheter placement needle was removed after catheter insertion. Results. Perineural catheters placed with ultrasound guidance took a median (10th–90th percentile) of 9.0 (6.0–13.2) minutes compared with 15.0 (4.9–30.0) minutes for stimulation (P < .01). All ultrasound‐guided catheters were successfully placed according to the protocol (n = 20) versus 70% in the stimulation group (n = 20; P < .01). All ultrasound‐guided catheters resulted in a successful surgical block, whereas 2 catheters placed by stimulation failed to result in surgical anesthesia. Six catheters (30%) placed via stimulation resulted in vascular punctures compared with none in the ultrasound group (P < .01). Procedure‐related pain scores were similar between groups (P = .34). Conclusions. Placement of infraclavicular perineural catheters takes less time, is more often successful, and results in fewer inadvertent vascular punctures when using ultrasound guidance compared with ES.     

Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access in the intensive care unit

Purpose

Central venous catheters continue to be a popular means of maintaining vascular access in surgical intensive care units despite well-described complications. With edema, obesity, and difficult to visualize veins potentially affecting the surgically ill, inability to obtain peripheral intravenous (PIV) access may hinder the clinician's ability to avoid the use of central lines. With ultrasound gaining increased popularity for obtaining vascular access, we evaluated its utility in ultrasonagraphically placing PIV catheters for the purposes of either avoiding central venous access or removing central venous catheters.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort review of our requests for ultrasound-guided PIV access in the intensive care unit between September 2007 and February 2008.

Results

Over a 6-month period, 77 requests for ultrasound-guided PIV access were made for 59 surgical, trauma, and cardiothoracic intensive care unit patients. Reasons for inability to obtain PIVs through standard means included edema (95%), obesity (42%), IV drug abuse history (8%), and emergency access (4%). Of the 148 PIV lines that were requested, 147 PIV catheters were successfully placed (99%). Of these, 105 PIV catheters were placed on the first attempt (71%). Complications of PIVs included IV infiltration (3.4%), inadvertent removal (2.7%), and phlebitis/cellulitis (0.7%). As a result of placing these PIV catheters, 40 central lines were discontinued and 34 central lines were avoided. The average number of line days at the time of central venous catheter removal was 11 ± 11 days.

Conclusion(s)

In intensive care unit patients who do not require central venous lines, ultrasound-guided PIV access can have a high placement success rate and can result in fewer central line days and/or less reliance on central venous catheters for access-only purposes.     

Ultrasound Guidance Versus Electrical Stimulation for Femoral Perineural Catheter Insertion

Objective. Continuous femoral nerve blocks provide potent analgesia and other benefits after knee surgery. Perineural catheter placement techniques using ultrasound guidance and electrical stimulation (ES) have been described, but the optimal method remains undetermined. We tested the hypothesis that ultrasound guidance alone requires less time for femoral perineural catheter insertion and produces equivalent results compared with ES alone. Methods. Preoperatively, patients receiving a femoral perineural catheter for knee surgery were randomly assigned to either ultrasound guidance with a nonstimulating catheter or ES with a stimulating catheter. The primary outcome was the catheter placement procedure time (minutes) starting when the ultrasound transducer (ultrasound group) or catheter insertion needle (ES group) first touched the patient and ending when the catheter insertion needle was removed after catheter insertion. Results. Perineural catheters placed with ultrasound guidance (n = 20) took a median (10th–90th percentiles) of 5.0 (3.9–10.0) minutes compared with 8.5 (4.8–30.0) minutes for ES (n = 20; P = .012). All ultrasound‐guided catheters were placed according to the protocol (n = 20) versus 85% of ES‐guided catheters (n = 20; P = .086). Patients in the ultrasound group had a median procedure‐related discomfort score of 0.5 (0.0–3.1) compared with 2.5 (0.0–7.6) for the ES group (P = .015). There were no vascular punctures with ultrasound guidance versus 4 in the ES group (P = .039). Conclusions. Placement of femoral perineural catheters takes less time with ultrasound guidance compared with ES. In addition, ultrasound guidance produces less procedure‐related pain and prevents inadvertent vascular puncture.     

Image-guided central venous catheter placement for apheresis in allogeneic stem cell donors

Peripheral blood stem cell harvest by apheresis is an increasingly important procedure utilized in the treatment of many malignancies. Whether autologous or allogeneic, it is frequently performed via peripheral access because of concern over major complications associated with central venous catheter placement. This study was to determine the safety and success, complications and premature failure rates for radiolocally placed ultrasound-guided non-tunneled central venous catheters placed for apheresis in a donor (allogeneic) population. One hundred central venous catheters were placed in ninety-one individuals for allogeneic stem cell harvest. Procedural success and complications relating to placement were noted in all. In 97 cases the number of needle passes required for venous cannulation and whether this was achieved with a single wall puncture was noted. Duration of catheterization and reason for removal were recorded in all cases. All catheters were placed by a right transjugular route. Venous cannulation and functioning line placement was achieved in every case; 92/97 (95%) required only a single needle pass and 84/97 (87%) only a single wall puncture. There were no placement related complications; 94 catheters were removed the same day with the remainder removed within 48 hr. All completed apheresis. Our study demonstrates the safe use of central venous catheters for apheresis in normal donors if ultrasound guidance is used for the puncture and the duration of catheterization is short.     

Infrared Vein Imaging for Insertion of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter for Patients Requiring Isolation for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

IntroductionEstablishing intravenous access is essential but may be difficult to achieve for patients requiring isolation for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of an infrared vein visualizer on peripheral intravenous catheter therapy in patients with coronavirus disease 2019.MethodsA nonrandomized clinical trial was performed. In total, 122 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 who required peripheral intravenous cannulation were divided into 2 groups with 60 in the control group and 62 in the intervention group. A conventional venipuncture method was applied to the control group, whereas an infrared vein imaging device was applied in the intervention group. The first attempt success rate, total procedure time, and patients’ satisfaction score were compared between the 2 groups using chi-square, t test, and z test (also known as Mann-Whitney U test) statistics.ResultsThe first attempt success rate in the intervention group was significantly higher than that of control group (91.94% vs 76.67%, ?² = 5.41, P = .02). The procedure time was shorter in the intervention group (mean [SD], 211.44 [68.58] seconds vs 388.27 [88.97] seconds, t = 12.27, P < .001). Patients from the intervention group experienced a higher degree of satisfaction (7.5 vs 6, z = ?3.31, P < .001).DiscussionPeripheral intravenous catheter insertion assisted by an infrared vein visualizer could improve the first attempt success rate of venipuncture, shorten the procedure time, and increase patients’ satisfaction.     

Addition of Local Anesthetic Epidural Infusion Catheter to Intravenous Opioid Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Control in Children Undergoing Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)

PurposePostoperative analgesia following minimally invasive video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in pediatric patients may involve intravenous opioid analgesics and continuous local anesthetic infusions via an epidural infusion catheter. The use of epidural catheters may avoid systemic side effects of intravenous opioids in this vulnerable population.DesignOur primary aim was to compare total morphine equivalents (MEQ) required, and pain scores between local anesthetic epidural infusion catheters combined with intravenous opioids, versus intravenous opioids alone in pediatric patients following VATS procedure.MethodsFollowing Institutional Review Board approval, we performed a retrospective chart review of children (ages 1 month to 18 years) who underwent VATS procedure for noncardiac thoracic surgery. Based on the postoperative analgesic technique used, the study population was divided into two groups that is, epidural group and nonepidural group. Both groups received intravenous systemic opioids. The primary outcome variables were total MEQ required and pain scores in the perioperative period.FindingsNinety-two patients were included in the study. Of these, 22 patients belonged to the epidural group versus 70 patients to the nonepidural group. There was no statistical difference in MEQ requirements or pain scores between the groups intraoperatively (P = .304), in the postanesthesia care unit (P = .166), or at postoperative time intervals of 24 hours (P = .805) and 48 hours (P = .844). The presence of infection or empyema was a significant factor for the avoidance of epidural placement by providers (P = .003).ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in the perioperative MEQ or postoperative pain scores between the epidural catheter group and the nonepidural group. More research is necessary to determine if this could be due to epidural catheter malposition and/or inadequate dermatomal coverage of surgical chest tubes.     

Difficult peripheral venous access: Clinical evaluation of a catheter inserted with the Seldinger method under ultrasound guidance

Purpose

A preliminary observational study was undertaken to evaluate the risk of failure of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheterization of a deep arm vein for a maximum of 7 days, after peripheral intravenous (PIV) cannulation failure.

Methods

This prospective study included patients referred to the intensive care unit for placement of a central line, a polyurethane cannula commercialized for arterial catheterization was used for peripheral venous cannulation. Catheter length and diameter were chosen based on preliminary ultrasound measurements of vein diameter and skin-vein distance.

Results

Catheterization was successful for all 29 patients. Mean vein diameter was 0.42 ± 0.39 cm; mean vein depth was 0.94 ± 0.52 cm. Mean catheter duration was 6 (median 7) days. Two occluded catheters were removed prematurely. No thrombophlebitis, catheter infection, or extravasation was observed.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that catheters inserted with the Seldinger method are adapted to prolonged peripheral deep-vein infusion. Ultrasound can play a role in catheter monitoring by identifying early thrombosis formation.     

Utilization of Intravenous Catheters by Prehospital Providers during Pediatric Transports

Introduction: Prehospital intravenous (IV) access in children may be difficult and time-consuming. Emergency Medical Service (EMS) protocols often dictate IV placement; however, some IV catheters may not be needed. The scene and transport time associated with attempting IV access in children is unknown. The objective of this study is to examine differences in scene and transport times associated with prehospital IV catheter attempt and utilization patterns of these catheters during pediatric prehospital encounters. Methods: Three non-blinded investigators abstracted EMS and hospital records of children 0–18 years of age transported by EMS to a pediatric emergency department (ED). We compared patients in which prehospital IV access was attempted to those with no documented attempt. Our primary outcome was scene time. Secondary outcomes include utilization of the IV catheter in the prehospital and ED settings and a determination of whether the catheter was indicated based on a priori established criteria (prehospital IV medication administration, hypotension, GCS < 13, and ICU admission). Results: We reviewed 1,138 records, 545 meeting inclusion criteria. IV catheter placement was attempted in 27% (n = 149) with success in 77% (n = 111). There was no difference in the presence of hypotension or median GCS between groups. Mean scene time (12.5 vs. 11.8 minutes) and transport time (16.9 vs. 14.6 minutes) were similar. Prehospital IV medications were given in 38.7% (43/111). One patient received a prehospital IV medication with no alternative route of administration. Among patients with a prehospital IV attempt, 31% (46/149) received IV medications in the ED and 23% (34/396) received IV fluids in the ED. Mean time to use of the IV in the ED was 70 minutes after arrival. Patients with prehospital IV attempt were more likely to receive IV medication within 30 minutes of ED arrival (39.1% vs. 19.0%, p = 0.04). Overall, 34.2% of IV attempts were indicated. Conclusions: Prehospital IV catheter placement in children is not associated with an increase in scene or transport time. Prehospital IV catheters were used in approximately one-third of patients. Further study is needed to determine which children may benefit most from IV access in the prehospital setting.     

Hemolyzed Laboratory Specimens in the Emergency Department: An Underappreciated,but Frequent Problem

IntroductionHemolysis of blood samples from emergency department (ED) patients leads to delays in treatment and disposition. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of hemolysis and variables predictive of hemolysis.MethodsThis observational cohort study was conducted among three institutions: academic tertiary care center and two suburban community EDs, with an annual census of over 270,000 ED visits. Data were obtained from the electronic health record. Adults requiring laboratory analysis with at least one peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) inserted within the ED were eligible. Primary outcome was hemolysis of lab samples and secondary outcomes included variables related to PIVC failure.ResultsBetween January 8, 2021 and May 9, 2022, 141,609 patient encounters met inclusion criteria. The average age was 55.5 and 57.5% of patients were female. Hemolysis occurred in 24,359 (17.2%) samples. In a multivariate analysis, when compared to 20-gauge catheters, smaller 22-gauge catheters had an increased odds of hemolysis (OR 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.65-1.91; P < .001), while larger 18-gauge catheters had a lower odds of hemolysis (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.90-0.98; P = .0046). Additionally, when compared to antecubital placement, hand/wrist placement demonstrated increased odds of hemolysis (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.97-2.15; P < .001). Finally, hemolysis was associated with a higher rate of PIVC failure (OR 1.06; 95%CI 1.00-1.13; P = 0.043).DiscussionThis large observational analysis demonstrates that lab hemolysis of is a frequent occurrence among ED patients. Given the added risk of hemolysis with certain placement variables, clinicians should consider catheter gauge/placement location to avoid hemolysis that may result in patient care delays and prolonged hospital stays.     

A Trainee‐Based Randomized Comparison of Stimulating Interscalene Perineural Catheters With a New Technique Using Ultrasound Guidance Alone

Objective. Compared to the well‐established stimulating catheter technique, the use of ultrasound guidance alone for interscalene perineural catheter insertion is a recent development and has not yet been examined in a randomized fashion. We hypothesized that an ultrasound‐guided technique would require less time and produce equivalent results compared to electrical stimulation (ES) when trainees attempt interscalene perineural catheter placement. Methods. Preoperatively, patients receiving an interscalene perineural catheter for shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to an insertion protocol using either ultrasound guidance with a nonstimulating catheter or ES with a stimulating catheter. The primary outcome was the procedural duration (in minutes), starting when the ultrasound probe (ultrasound group) or catheter insertion needle (ES group) first touched the patient and ending when the catheter insertion needle was removed after catheter insertion. Results. All ultrasound‐guided catheters (n = 20) were placed successfully and resulted in surgical anesthesia versus 85% of ES‐guided catheters (n = 20; P = .231). Perineural catheters placed by ultrasound (n = 20) took a median (10th–90th percentiles) of 8.0 (5.0–15.5) minutes compared to 14.0 (5.0–30.0) minutes for ES (n = 20; P = .022). All catheters placed according to the protocol in both treatment groups resulted in a successful nerve block; however, 1 patient in the ES group had local anesthetic spread to the epidural space. There was 1 vascular puncture using ultrasound guidance compared to 5 in the ES‐guided catheter group (P = .182). Conclusions. Trainees using a new ultrasound‐guided technique can place inter‐scalene perineural catheters in less time compared to a well‐documented technique using ES with a stimulating catheter and can produce equivalent results.     

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement With the Sonic Flashlight

Objective. We describe a case series constituting the first clinical trial by intravenous (IV) team nurses using the sonic flashlight (SF) for ultrasound guidance of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement. Methods. Two IV team nurses with more than 10 years of experience with placing PICCs and 3 to 6 years of experience with ultrasound attempted to place PICCs under ultrasound guidance in patients requiring long‐term IV access. One of two methods of ultrasound guidance was used: conventional ultrasound (CUS; 60 patients) or a new device called the SF (44 patients). The number of needle punctures required to gain IV access was recorded for each patient. Results. In both methods, 87% of the cases resulted in successful venous access on the first attempt. The average number of needle sticks per patient was 1.18 for SF‐guided procedures compared with 1.20 for CUS‐guided procedures. No significant difference was found in the distribution of the number of attempts between the two methods. Anecdotal comments by the nurses indicated the comparative ease of use of the SF display, although the relatively small scale of the SF image compared with the CUS image was also noted. Conclusions. We have shown that the SF is a safe and effective device for guidance of PICC placement in the hands of experienced IV team nurses. The advantage of placing the ultrasound image at its actual location must be balanced against the relatively small scale of the SF image.     

Effect of rapid cycle deliberate practice in peripheral intravenous catheters insertion training: A simulation experimental study

Aimto compare the effect of rapid cycle deliberate practice simulation training with skill-training simulation on peripheral intravenous catheter insertion for Licensed Practical Nurses.BackgroundThe use of peripheral intravenous catheters is associated with high rates of complications, although it is widely used in clinical practice. Training strategies to ensure good performance can minimize the risks inherent to this procedure.DesignA randomized simulation experimental pre-post interventional study.MethodsSixty participants were allocated to intervention (n = 30) or control (n = 30) groups. Participants allocated to the intervention group were trained through the Rapid cycle deliberate practice simulation strategy, while participants in the control group were trained through the skill-training simulation strategy. A pre-test was applied before any intervention and a post-test after intervention. The primary outcome was the performance in the peripheral intravenous catheter insertion skill. The comparison of correct performance in the tests was analyzed intergroup and intragroup. The effect size of the interventions was also analyzed. The t-Student and Mann-Whitney tests compared the difference between the groups. The training effect was calculated by Cohen's dm and Glass's Δ measures.ResultsPerformance between the pre-post-test increased from 59.4% to 96% (p < 0.001) in the intervention group and from 57.8% to 93.5% in the control group (p < 0001). There was no statistical difference between the groups after intervention (p = 0225). Cohen's dm measurement was 2.95 and 3.59 in the control and intervention groups, respectively.ConclusionsThe rapid cycle deliberate practice simulation strategy resulted in Licensed Practical Nurses’ performance improvements in peripheral intravenous catheter insertion, evidenced by the increase of correct performance actions in the post-test compared to the pre-test. However, with no statistical difference compared to the skill-training simulation strategy.     

Decrease in central venous catheter placement due to use of ultrasound guidance for peripheral intravenous catheters

Study Objectives

Obtaining intravenous (IV) access in the emergency department (ED) can be especially challenging, and physicians often resort to placement of central venous catheters (CVCs). Use of ultrasound-guided peripheral IV catheters (USGPIVs) can prevent many “unnecessary” CVCs, but the true impact of USGPIVs has never been quantified. This study set out to determine the reduction in CVCs by USGPIV placement.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational study conducted in 2 urban EDs. Patients who were to undergo placement of a CVC due to inability to establish IV access by other methods were enrolled. Ultrasound-trained physicians then attempted USGPIV placement. Patients were followed up for up to 7 days to assess for CVC placement and related complications.

Results

One hundred patients were enrolled and underwent USGPIV placement. Ultrasound-guided peripheral IV catheters were initially successfully placed in all patients but failed in 12 patients (12.0%; 95 confidence interval [CI], 7.0%-19.8%) before ED disposition, resulting in 4 central lines, 7 repeated USGPIVs, and 1 patient requiring no further intervention. Through the inpatient follow-up period, another 11 patients underwent CVC placement, resulting in a total of 15 CVCs (15.0%; 95 CI, 9.3%-23.3%) placed. Of the 15 patients who did receive a CVC, 1 patient developed a catheter-related infection, resulting in a 6.7% (95 CI, 1.2%-29.8%) complication rate.

Conclusion

Ultrasound prevented the need for CVC placement in 85% of patients with difficult IV access. This suggests that USGPIVs have the potential to reduce morbidity in this patient population.     

Extended dwell and standard ultrasound guided peripheral intravenous catheters: Comparison of durability and reliability

BackgroundVascular access is a critical component of emergency department (ED) care. Ultrasound guided placement of peripheral intravenous (USIV) catheters is increasingly common. However, USIV are thought to suffer from reduced durability and higher complication rates. Extended dwell catheters (EDC) are long peripheral IVs placed under combined ultrasound and wire guidance. The goal of this study is to compare dwell times and complication rates of EDC to standard peripheral USIV.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care adult ED comparing IV placements during a 17-month period (8/1/2018–12/31/2019), stratified by standard USIV versus EDC. The primary outcome was catheter dwell time and secondary outcomes included need for inpatient vascular access team (VAST) consultation, peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertions, and radiocontrast extravasations. Multivariable Cox regression time-to-event analyses were used to evaluate dwell times, adjusting for age, gender, BMI and end-stage renal disease.Results359 EDC and 4190 standard USIV were included for analysis. Most USIV (95.6%) and EDC (98.3%) were placed by ED technicians trained in ultrasound vascular access. EDC median dwell time (5.9 days [95%CI: 5.1–6.7]) exceeded standard USIV (3.8 days [95% CI: 3.6–4.0]). Patients with EDC placed in the ED required less VAST consultation (0.84 vs 0.99 charges/encounter), had similar rates of PICC line use (8.0% vs 8.4% of encounters) and had no radiocontrast extravasation events. Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated survival benefit (longer dwell time) favoring EDC (HR 0.70 [95%CI 0.60–0.81]).ConclusionUse of EDC results in longer dwell time and reduces subsequent use of vascular access resources, while maintaining low complication rates. EDC demonstrate superior durability which may justify their selection over standard USIV in some patients.     

Safety and efficacy of peripheral versus centrally administered vasopressor infusion: A single-centre retrospective observational study

BackgroundShock affects one-third of patients admitted to intensive care and is associated with increased mortality. Vasopressor medications are used to maintain blood pressure in shock. Central venous catheters are associated with serious complications and pose logistical difficulties for insertion. Delivery of vasopressors via peripheral intravenous cannula may be a safe alternative.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study comparing safety profile and outcomes of vasopressor delivery via peripheral and central routes in critically ill patients over a 12-month period in a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments, and safety outcome data were extracted from medical records. Patients were classified into three groups: vasopressor infusions via peripheral intravenous cannula, combined peripheral intravenous cannula followed by central venous catheter, and central venous catheter only. Groups were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. The impact of duration of vasopressor infusion on complication rates was assessed using logistic regression.ResultsWe identified 212 patients who received vasopressor infusion, 39 received via peripheral only (Group 1), 155 via peripheral followed by central (Group 2), and 18 via central only (Group 3). There were some baseline differences between groups. Group 1 had the lowest median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score (64, interquartile range = 44–77), and Group 3, the highest (86, interquartile range = 57–101). Duration of vasopressor infusion was shortest in Group 1 and longer in Groups 2 and 3. There were no major complications; however, minor complications such as leakage, extravasation, and erythema occurred in 41% of Group 1 and 28% of Group 2 patients. Duration of peripheral vasopressor infusion was not associated with an increased risk of complications.ConclusionsAdministration of vasopressor infusions for short duration in critically ill patients via a peripheral venous cannula may be feasible, with low rates of complications, and offers a safe alternative to central venous access.     

Effectiveness of an Intravenous Protection Device in Pediatric Patients on Catheter Dwell Time and Phlebitis Score

PurposeThe study aimed to examine the efficacy of the I.V. House UltraDressing for protecting peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) in pediatric patients.MethodsThis randomized controlled trial comprised 60 pediatric patients (aged 2–24 months): 30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. The PIVC dwell time and phlebitis scores were also reported for both groups. The degree of phlebitis was determined using the Visual Infusion Phlebitis Scale (VIPS) and was recorded every 8 hours from the start of antibiotic therapy until catheter removal.ResultsThe mean catheter dwell time in the experimental group (2.10 ± 1.55 days) was significantly longer than that in the control group (1.27 ± 0.45 days) (p < .01). However, there were no significant differences between the scores and signs of phlebitis in both groups (p > .05).ConclusionThe I.V. House UltraDressing is a useful device that can be used to increase catheter dwell time and protect and stabilize PIVCs in pediatric patients.     

Factors influencing nurse compliance in maintaining aseptic technique in the insertion of peripheral intravenous access in neonates

BackgroundAseptic technique is the foundation for preventing bloodstream infections due to peripheral intravenous access insertion. This study aims at identifying the factors influencing nurse compliance in maintaining aseptic technique in the insertion of a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC).MethodologyThe research method is cross-sectional with 160 nurses. The related variables measured were repeated insertion, infant care (incubator or radiation warmer), age of nurse, working experience, level of education of nurses, level of knowledge, work schedule, and number of teams on duty. The nurse's knowledge was measured using a modified questionnaire, and the level of compliance was measured by an observation sheet.ResultsHigher age and education level of nurses were significantly associated with an increase in the level of nurse compliance (β = 0.053–1.22; p < 0.001; <0.015). Working experience, the number of insertions, the level of knowledge of nurses about PIVC, and the place of care in the radiant warmer were associated negatively with a decrease in the level of nurse compliance in the use of aseptic PIVC techniques (β = −0.011; - 0.152; p < 0.001).ConclusionAge and educational qualifications should be considered for the potential contributing to nurses' compliance with the aseptic protocol in the neonatal care unit.     

A randomized trial of ultrasound-guided peripheral IV catheter placement in difficult access patients using a guidewire approach

ObjectiveThe purpose of this pilot study was to investigate whether use of a guidewire improves successful placement of ultrasound-guided peripheral IVs (PIV) in difficult intravenous access patients in the emergency department (ED).MethodsThis was an unblinded, prospective, randomized trial performed by emergency medicine (EM) clinicians at a single academic ED. Eligible participants were randomized to ultrasound-guided PIV placement with or without the use of a guidewire. PIV access was obtained using the Accucath™ 20 gauge × 5.7 cm catheters by way of deployment or non-deployment of the guidewire. Primary outcome measure was first-pass success rate and secondary outcomes included number of attempts, complication rates, and clinician reported ease of insertion.ResultsSeventy patients were enrolled and 69 were included in the final analysis. Thirty-four participants were randomized to use of guidewire and 35 to no guidewire. First-pass success rates were similar with and without guidewire use, 47.1% vs. 45.7%, (p = 0.9). There were no differences found in median number of attempts between the two techniques, 2 (IQR 1–2) vs 2 (IQR 1–2), (p = 0.60). The complication rates were similar, 15% vs. 29% (p = 0.25). Clinicians reported no difference in ease of insertion between methods on a 5-point Likert Scale, mean 2.6 vs 2.7 (p = 0.76).DiscussionIn this pilot study comparing ultrasound-guided PIV placement in ED patients using an integrated guidewire versus no guidewire, there was no significant difference in first-pass success, number of attempts, or complication rates. This study provides preliminary data for further investigations.