Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Rosuvastatin and Olmesartan: A Randomized,Open-label, 3-period,Multiple-dose Crossover Study in Healthy Korean Male Subjects

Purpose

Rosuvastatin has been widely used in combination with olmesartan for the treatment of dyslipidemia accompanied by hypertension. With no information currently available on the interaction between the 2 drugs, a pharmacokinetic study was conducted to investigate the influence of rosuvastatin on olmesartan and vice versa when the 2 drugs were coadministered. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic profile of coadministration of the rosuvastatin 20-mg tablet and the olmesartan 40-mg tablet and the associated drug–drug interaction in healthy Korean male volunteers.

Methods

This was a randomized, open-label, 3-period, multiple-dose crossover study. Eligible subjects were aged 20 to 50 years and within 20% of their ideal body weight. After being randomly assigned to 6 groups of equal number, subjects received each of the following 3 formulations once a day for 7 consecutive days with an 8-day washout period between the formulations: rosuvastatin 20-mg tablet, olmesartan 40-mg tablet, and coadministration of the rosuvastatin 20-mg tablet and the olmesartan 40-mg tablet. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after dosing, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for rosuvastatin, its active metabolite (N-desmethyl rosuvastatin), and olmesartan. Adverse events were evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations.

Findings

Among the 36 enrolled subjects, 34 completed the study (mean [range] age, 28.6 [23–49] y; mean [range] weight, 66.4 [52.2–78.7] kg). The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters for the coadministration of the 2 drugs to the mono-administration of each drug were 85.14% to 96.08% for AUC_τ and 81.41% to 97.48% for C_ss,max for rosuvastatin, and 77.55% to 89.48% for AUC_τ and 75.62% to 90.12% for C_ss,max for N-desmethyl rosuvastatin; those values were 95.61% to 102.57% for AUC_τ and 91.73% to 102.98% for C_ss,max for olmesartan. Dizziness was the most frequently noted adverse drug reaction, occurring in 1 subject receiving mono-administration of rosuvastatin, 1 subject receiving mono-administration of olmesartan, and 4 subjects receiving coadministration of rosuvastatin and olmesartan. All the adverse events were expected, and there was no significant difference in the incidence between the 2 formulations.

Implications

This study suggests that rosuvastatin and olmesartan did not significantly influence each other’s pharmacokinetics when coadministered. Although the pharmacokinetics of N-desmethyl rosuvastatin were influenced by olmesartan, such interactions were considered clinically insignificant. All 3 formulations were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events or drug reactions were noted.     

Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin/Olmesartan Fixed-Dose Combination: A Single-Dose,Randomized, Open-Label, 2-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Korean Subjects

Background

Rosuvastatin, a lipid-lowering agent, has been widely used with olmesartan, a long-acting angiotensin II receptor blocker, indicated for the treatment of dyslipidemia accompanied by hypertension. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of these 2 drugs was recently developed to enhance the dosing convenience and to increase patient compliance while yielding pharmacokinetic profiles comparable to coadministration of each drug as individual tablets.

Objective

The goal of present study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of single-dose administration of an FDC tablet containing rosuvastatin/olmesartan 20/40 mg (test formulation) with coadministration of a rosuvastatin 20-mg tablet and a olmesartan 40-mg tablet (reference formulation) in healthy Korean male volunteers, for the purpose of determining bioequivalence.

Methods

This single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study enrolled subjects aged 20 to 50 years and within 20% of ideal body weight. Each subject received a single dose of the test and reference formulations orally in a fasted state, with a 7-day washout period between the administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after dosing, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for rosuvastatin, its active metabolite (N-desmethyl rosuvastatin), and olmesartan. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were within the predetermined range of 80% to 125%. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations.

Results

Among the 58 enrolled subjects, 54 completed the study. The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: rosuvastatin: AUC_last, 85.60% to 97.40% and C_max, 83.16% to 98.21%; N-desmethyl rosuvastatin: AUC_last, 82.08% to 93.45% and C_max, 79.23% to 93.41%; and olmesartan: AUC_last, 97.69% to 105.69% and C_max, 100.35% to 109.42%. The most frequently noted AE was headache, occurring in 3 and 6 patients with the test and reference formulations, respectively. All of the AEs were expected, and there was no significant difference in the prevalences of AEs between the 2 formulations.

Conclusions

The pharmacokinetic properties of the newly developed FDC tablet of rosuvastatin/olmesartan 20/40 mg suggest that it is bioequivalent to co-administration of each drug as individual tablets in these healthy Korean male subjects. The two formulations were well tolerated, with no serious AEs observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01823900.     

Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Rosuvastatin and Telmisartan in Healthy Korean Male Volunteers: A Randomized,Open-label,Two-period,Crossover, Multiple-dose Study

Purpose

Rosuvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, and telmisartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, are commonly prescribed in combination for the treatment of dyslipidemia accompanied by hypertension. However, the nature of the pharmacokinetic interaction between the 2 drugs is not clearly understood. The goal of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic drug–drug interaction between rosuvastatin and telmisartan in a healthy Korean population.

Methods

This was a randomized, 2-part, open-label, 2-period, crossover, multiple-dose study, with each part composed of different subjects between the ages of 20 and 55 years. In part 1, each subject received rosuvastatin 20 mg with and without telmisartan 80 mg once daily for 6 consecutive days. In part 2, each subject received telmisartan 80 mg with and without rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 consecutive days. In both parts, there was a 16-day washout period between mono- and coadministration. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after the last dose. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated through interviews and physical examinations.

Findings

In part 1, the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters for coadministration of the 2 drugs to monoadministration of each drug were 1.0736–1.2932 for AUC_τ and 1.7442–2.3229 for C_max,ss for rosuvastatin and 0.9942–1.1594 for AUC_τ and 1.3593–1.7169 for C_max,ss for N-desmethyl rosuvastatin, whereas in part 2, the CIs were 1.0834–1.2672 for AUC_τ and 1.1534–1.5803 for C_max,ss for telmisartan. The most frequently noted AE was cough in part 1, which occurred in 2 subjects receiving the combination therapy, and oropharyngeal pain in part 2, which occurred in 3 subjects receiving the combination therapy. All reported AEs were mild or moderate, and there was no significant difference in incidence between the treatments.

Implications

These findings demonstrated that rosuvastatin and telmisartan mutually affected each other’s pharmacokinetics, suggesting a possibility of drug–drug interaction. However, based on dose–response characteristics of the 2 drugs and previous results from other interaction studies, the degree of drug interaction observed in this study was not regarded as clinically significant. All treatments were well tolerated, with no serious AEs observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01992601.     

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Ticagrelor and Venlafaxine,a Cytochrome P-450 2D6 Substrate,in Healthy Subjects

Purpose

Ticagrelor is a reversibly binding P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist used clinically for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Ticagrelor has been shown in vitro to be a weak inhibitor of cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 2D6, a clinically important enzyme for the metabolism of many drugs. This study assessed the effects of coadministration of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2D6 substrate venlafaxine. The impact of venlafaxine on ticagrelor pharmacokinetic parameters was also investigated.

Methods

Healthy subjects (N = 22) received a single 180-mg oral dose of ticagrelor on days 1 and 9 and oral doses of venlafaxine on day 4 (37.5 mg BID) and days 5 through 10 (75 mg BID). Plasma concentrations of ticagrelor, venlafaxine, and their metabolites (AR-C124910XX and O-desmethylvenlafaxine [ODV], respectively) were quantified for pharmacokinetic analyses. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study.

Findings

Overall, 19 of 25 subjects were male; 14 were white, 10 were black, and 1 was Asian. Mean (SD) age was 26 (6) years, and mean (SD) body mass index was 24.3 (2.9) kg/m². Ticagrelor had no effect on overall exposure to venlafaxine, as assessed by the AUC_0–τ (geometric least squares mean ratio, 110.32 ng · h/mL [90% CI, 106.27–114.52]). Venlafaxine C_max was increased by 22% in the presence of ticagrelor (121.83 ng/mL [90% CI, 111.80–132.75]). ODV AUC_0–τ and C_max were unaffected by coadministration with ticagrelor (98.71 ng · h/mL [90% CI, 96.61–100.85] and 101.44 ng/mL [90% CI, 98.34–104.65], respectively). Venlafaxine had no effect on the C_max or AUC_0–∞ of ticagrelor (96.54 ng/mL [90% CI, 85.03–109.61] and 89.67 ng · h/mL [90% CI, 82.78–97.14]) or AR-C124910XX (106.39 ng/mL [90% CI, 96.10–117.78] and 106.32 ng · h/mL [90% CI, 97.28–116.21], respectively). Ticagrelor and venlafaxine were well tolerated whether given alone or in combination.

Implications

Ticagrelor had no clinically relevant effect on the plasma levels of venlafaxine and its CYP2D6-generated active metabolite, ODV. On the basis of these data, ticagrelor is not expected to affect CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism to a clinically relevant extent. Venlafaxine had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor.     

Comparison of Scaled-average,Population, and Individual Bioequivalence on 2 Tablets of Pitavastatin Calcium: A 3-Period,Reference-replicated,Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

Background

Pitavastatin, a fully synthetic β-hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl–coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, is potent for the treatment of primary hyperlipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia. Recently, the original product and some generic products of pitavastatin calcium have become available in China. However, the intrasubject variability and interchangeability of this newly developed generic product and the branded innovator product have rarely been investigated in the Chinese population.

Purpose

The aim of this study is to develop and compare the scaled-average, population, and individual bioequivalence (BE) of pitavastatin calcium tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers. This study will be used to allow for the interchangeability (switchability and prescribability) of the 2 products in clinical medication in China.

Methods

A single-dose, reference-replicated, 3-period crossover BE study was conducted in 36 healthy male volunteers. Plasma samples were collected before and after oral administration of 2-mg test or reference tablets. A LC-MS/MS method was used to determine the concentration of pitavastatin calcium. A noncompartmental method was used to investigate the pharmacokinetic parameters. The ANOVA and 90% CIs of ln(AUC_0–t) and ln(C_max) were used for statistical analysis of scaled-average BE. A nonparametric test (Wilcoxon signed rank test) was performed to T_max. The analyses of population BE and individual BE were used to assess the switchability and prescribability of the 2 products.

Findings

Thirty-six volunteers were enrolled in this clinical research; 33 volunteers completed the 3 treatment periods. The mean (SD) relative bioavailability calculated from the ratios (T/R) of AUC_0–t was 101.3% (19.7%). The mean ln(AUC_0–t) and ln(C_max) were 98.64 (90% CI, 93.44–104.13) and 98.68 (90% CI, 91.88–105.99) within previously stipulated ranges recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration and the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA). The intrasubject %CVs of AUC_0–t and C_max were 12.0% and 18.0% for the reference tablet and 13.0% and 17.0% for the test tablet. No significant differences were found among T_max (0.742 ± 0.276, 0.674 ± 0.202, and 0.689 ± 0.226, respectively) for reference tablet 1, reference Supplemental Table II in the online version at 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.21, and test tablet by a Wilcoxon test (P > 0.05). For ln(AUC_0–t) and ln(C_max), the statistical test-reference ratios were 99.13% and 98.95%, respectively. After inspecting the results for reference and mixed scaling, all the upper confidence limits were <0; therefore, population and individual BE were given.

Implications

In the healthy Chinese males, the generic and branded name tablets of pitavastatin calcium are bioequivalent at the rate and extent of absorption after a comparison of scaled-average, population, and individual BE and thus may be used interchangeably. Both the formulations are generally well tolerated. Chinese Clinical Trial identifier: ChiCTR-TTRCC-13003973.     

Pharmacokinetic Comparison of 2 Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets of Amlodipine and Valsartan in Healthy Male Korean Volunteers: A Randomized,Open-Label, 2-Period,Single-Dose,Crossover Study

Background

Amlodipine and valsartan have different mechanisms of action, and it is known that the combination therapy with the 2 drugs increases treatment effects compared with the monotherapy with each drug. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) drug is a formulation including fixed amounts of active drug ingredients combined in a single dosage form that is expected to improve medication compliance.

Objective

The goal of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of single administration of a newly developed FDC tablet containing amlodipine orotate 10 mg and valsartan 160 mg (test formulation) with the conventional FDC tablet of amlodipine besylate 10 mg and valsartan 160 mg (reference formulation) in healthy male Korean volunteers.

Methods

This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-way crossover study. Eligible subjects were between the ages of 20 and 50 years and within 20% of their ideal weight. Each subject received a single dose of the reference and the test formulations, with a 14-day washout period between formulations. Blood samples were collected up to 144 hours after the dose, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for amlodipine and valsartan. Adverse events were evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations.

Results

Forty-eight of the 50 enrolled subjects completed the study. For both amlodipine and valsartan, the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were included in the range for assumed bioequivalence, yielding 90% CI ratios of 0.9277 to 0.9903 for AUC_0–last and 0.9357 to 1.0068 for C_max in amlodipine, and 0.9784 to 1.1817 for AUC_0–last and 0.9738 to 1.2145 for C_max in valsartan. Dizziness was the most frequently noted adverse event, occurring in 4 subjects with the test formulation, followed by oropharyngeal pain occurring in 1 subject with the test formulation and 3 subjects with the reference formulation. All other adverse events occurred in <3 subjects.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the pharmacokinetics of the newly developed FDC tablet of amlodipine and valsartan did not differ significantly from the conventional FDC tablet in these healthy Korean male subjects. Both formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01823913.     

Setipiprant,a Selective Oral Antagonist of Human CRTH2: Relative Bioavailability of a Capsule and a Tablet Formulation in Healthy Female and Male Subjects

Background

CRTH2 is a prostaglandin D₂ receptor that plays an important role in allergic inflammation. Setipiprant is a potent CRTH2 antagonist under development for the treatment of allergic diseases.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of a setipiprant capsule (reference) and a tablet formulation.

Methods

This was an open-label, 2-period, 2-way crossover, randomized study in which 20 healthy women and men (1:1 ratio) received either 2 250-mg capsules or a 500-mg tablet of setipiprant. Subjects were between 18 and 45 years old, with a body mass index of 18.0 to 28.0 kg/m². Differences in pharmacokinetics of setipiprant formulations were explored overall and by sex.

Results

All subjects completed the study. Both formulations were well tolerated, with headache the most frequently reported adverse event (25% of subjects), followed by flatulence (15%) and somnolence and fatigue (10%). The adverse event profile in men and women and between formulations was similar. The ratios of geometric means for C_max (0.94; 95% CI, 0.79–1.12) and AUC_0–∞ (1.01; 95% CI, 0.92–1.12) were mostly within the limits of 0.80 to 1.25. When corrected for weight, the differences observed between sexes, within each treatment, for C_max (capsules: 1.01; 95% CI, 0.71–1.44; tablet: 0.89; 95% CI, 0.62–1.26) and AUC_0–∞ (capsules: 1.12; 95% CI, 0.86–1.47; tablet: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.73–1.25) were minor.

Conclusion

Both the setipiprant formulations were well tolerated. Setipiprant pharmacokinetics were similar between formulations, overall, and between sexes. The new tablet formulation may constitute a valid alternative to the capsule formulation for later clinical development phases. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01877629.     

Comparative Fasting Bioavailability of 2 Bepotastine Formulations in Healthy Male Chinese Volunteers: An Open-Label,Randomized, Single-Dose, 2-Way Crossover Study

Background

Bepotastine is a second-generation histamine₁ receptor antagonist that is used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, urticaria, and pruritus associated with skin disease. A new generic formulation of bepotastine has been developed in China, and information concerning bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties in the Chinese population has not been reported.

Objective

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties of 2 tablet formulations of bepotastine, the 10-mg generic formulation (test) and a branded formulation (reference), in healthy male Chinese volunteers to obtain registration approval of the test formulation.

Methods

A single-center, open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover study with a 1-week washout period was conducted in 24 healthy male volunteers. Blood samples were collected for 16 hours after a single dose of the 10-mg bepotastine test formulation or the reference formulation. Plasma bepotastine concentrations were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. C_max, T_max, AUC_0–t, AUC_0–∞, and t_½ were determined using noncompartmental analysis. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs for the log-transformed C_max and AUC values were within the predetermined interval of 75% to 133% and 80% to 125%, respectively, according to the guidelines of the China Food and Drug Administration.

Results

No significant differences were found in mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters between the test and reference drugs, including C_max (74.81 [9.91] ng/mL vs 78.60 [29.58] ng/mL), AUC_0–t (295.55[115.29] ng·h/mL vs 299.17[109.29] ng·h/mL), and AUC_0-∞ (305.28 [118.50] ng·h/mL vs 310.90 [112.20] ng·h/mL). The mean (SD) t_½ values of the test and reference formulations were 2.53 (0.50) hours and 2.62 (0.41) hours, respectively. The 90% CIs of the treatment ratios for the logarithmic transformed values of C_max, AUC_0–t, and AUC_0–∞ were 86.96% to 101.80%, 93.22% to 104.13%, and 92.66% to 103.30%, respectively. All values were within the predetermined bioequivalence range. Two adverse events were reported as neutropenia (1 volunteer [4.2%]) and neutrophilia (1 volunteer [4.2%]). Both adverse events were transient and considered mild by physicians.

Conclusion

The test and reference tablets met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence as defined by the China Food and Drug Administration. Both formulations were well tolerated. Chinese Clinical Trials Registry identifier: ChiCTR-TTRCC-13003723.     

Bioequivalence of Dapagliflozin/Metformin Extended-release Fixed-combination Drug Product and Single-component Dapagliflozin and Metformin Extended-release Tablets in Healthy Russian Subjects

Purpose

Fixed-combination drug products (FCDPs) combining dapagliflozin and metformin extended release (XR) may provide patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with an alternative antihyperglycemic treatment, which could improve adherence by reducing tablet burden. This study evaluated the bioequivalence of dapagliflozin/metformin XR FCDP versus the co-administration of the individual monotherapy tablets currently available for use in the Russian Federation.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Gemigliptin and Metformin,and Potential Differences in the Pharmacokinetic Profile of Gemigliptin Between the Mexican and Korean Populations: A Randomized,Open-label Study in Healthy Mexican Volunteers

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic interactions between a newly developed dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor, gemigliptin, and metformin in healthy Mexican male volunteers, and the differences in the pharmacokinetic profile of gemigliptin between Korean and Mexican healthy volunteers.

Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics,Safety, and Tolerability of Vitamin D3 in DP-R206 (150-mg Ibandronate/24,000-IU Vitamin D3 Tablet) and as Monotherapy (24,000 IU) in Healthy Male Korean Adults

Background

Combined treatment with a bisphosphonate and vitamin D has been proposed for postmenopausal osteoporosis. A new, fixed-dose combination tablet of ibandronate plus vitamin D₃ has been developed for monthly administration to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Objectives

The main objective of the present study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of vitamin D₃ administered in 2 forms: a newly developed ibandronate 150-mg/vitamin D₃ 24,000-IU tablet (DP-R206, test drug) and a stand-alone vitamin D₃ 24,000-IU tablet (reference drug). A secondary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of DP-R206 in healthy adult male Korean volunteers.

Methods

This study was a single-dose, open-label, randomized-sequence, 2-treatment, 2-way crossover trial. Blood samples were collected from 24 hours’ predose to 120 hours’ postdose. The plasma concentrations of vitamin D₃ were analyzed by using a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated, and the 90% CIs of the ratios of the geometric means of the parameters were determined from the logarithmically transformed data by using ANOVA.

Results

Thirty-sex healthy adult male Korean volunteers with a mean (SD) age of 25.8 (2.7) years, a mean height of 174.0 (5.9) cm, and a mean weight of 69.1 (6.2) kg were enrolled; 29 participants completed the study. The 90% CIs of the ratios of the geometric means (test drug/reference drug) of the baseline-corrected C_max, AUC_0–last, and AUC_0–∞ values were 0.93 to 1.24, 0.89 to 1.19, and 0.87 to 1.18, respectively. The 90% CIs of the ratios of the geometric means (test drug/reference drug) of the baseline-uncorrected C_max, AUC_0–last, and AUC_0–∞ values were 0.93 to 1.24, 0.88 to 1.19, and 0.87 to 1.18, respectively. Eighty-four adverse events (AEs) were reported in 24 of 32 subjects receiving DP-R206, and 14 AEs were reported in 8 of 29 subjects receiving the vitamin D₃ 24,000-IU tablet. All of the subjects who experienced AEs recovered without sequelae, and no serious AEs were observed.

Conclusions

The vitamin D₃ pharmacokinetics were similar for DP-R206 and the 24,000-IU vitamin D₃ tablet. DP-R206 was well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01577849.     

Effects of Hydrochlorothiazide on the Pharmacokinetics,Pharmacodynamics, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin,a Sodium Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitor,in Healthy Participants

Background

Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) also have hypertension, which is commonly treated with thiazide diuretics, including hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). Canagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor developed for the treatment of T2DM, lowers plasma glucose by inhibiting renal glucose reabsorption, thereby increasing urinary glucose excretion and mild osmotic diuresis. Because patients with T2DM are likely to receive concurrent canagliflozin and HCTZ, potential interactions were evaluated.

Objective

This study evaluated the effects of HCTZ on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and tolerability of canagliflozin in healthy participants.

Methods

This Phase I, single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence, 2-period study was conducted in healthy participants. During period 1, participants received canagliflozin 300 mg once daily for 7 days, followed by a 14-day washout period. During period 2, participants received HCTZ 25 mg once daily for 28 days, followed by canagliflozin 300 mg + HCTZ 25 mg once daily for 7 days. Blood samples were taken before and several times after administration on day 7 of period 1 and on days 28 and 35 of period 2 for canagliflozin and HCTZ pharmacokinetic analyses using LC-MS/MS. Blood and urine samples were collected for up to 24 hours after canagliflozin administration on day 1 of period 1 and day 35 of period 2 for pharmacodynamic glucose assessment. Tolerability was also evaluated.

Results

Thirty participants were enrolled (16 men, 14 women; all white; mean age, 43.7 years). Canagliflozin AUC during a dosing interval (T) at steady state (AUC_τ,ss) and C_max at steady state (C_max,ss) were increased when canagliflozin was coadministered with HCTZ, with geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of 1.12 (1.08–1.17) and 1.15 (1.06–1.25), respectively. AUC_τ,ss and C_max,ss for HCTZ were similar with and without canagliflozin coadministration. The 24-hour mean renal threshold for glucose and mean plasma glucose were comparable for canagliflozin alone and coadministered with HCTZ. The change in 24-hour urine volume from baseline was −0.1 L with canagliflozin alone and 0.4 L with HCTZ alone and with canagliflozin + HCTZ. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher with canagliflozin + HCTZ (69%) than with canagliflozin (47%) or HCTZ (50%) alone; most AEs were of mild severity. Overall, minimal changes in serum electrolytes (eg, sodium, potassium) were observed after coadministration of canagliflozin + HCTZ compared with individual treatments.

Conclusions

Adding canagliflozin treatment to healthy participants on HCTZ treatment had no notable pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic effects; canagliflozin coadministered with HCTZ was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected tolerability concerns. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01294631.     

Exposure-Response (Safety) Analysis to Identify Linifanib Dose for a Phase III Study in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths and the fifth most common cancer globally. Hepatocellular carcinoma produces highly vascular tumors that overexpress vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), thus making VEGF a promising therapeutic target. The competitive inhibitor linifanib (ABT-869) has selectivity for VEGF and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors and minimal activity against unrelated tyrosine and serine and threonine kinases. However, the optimal dosing regimen for linifanib in HCC patients is not yet known.

Objective

This study attempts to identify a linifanib dose or dosing regimen with an acceptable safety profile for a Phase III study in HCC patients.

Methods

The pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of linifanib were characterized from 2 Phase I and 3 Phase II clinical trials. Of the 266 patients evaluated, the median weight was 68 kg (range, 35-177 kg), 64% were male, and 87.6% of patients received an oral solution of linifanib, whereas 12.4% received a tablet formulation. Approximately 95% of patients received drug based on weight, with the remaining on a fixed-dosing regimen. A population PK analysis was conducted to characterize the linifanib exposure for each patient. Linifanib C_max and AUC derived from the population PK properties were correlated with the rates of adverse events (AEs).

Results

Linifanib PK properties are dose proportional for the 0.10-mg/kg to 0.25-mg/kg once daily dose range and are time independent after repeated oral dosing. The T_max of linifanib is approximately 3 hours, and the t_½ is approximately 1 day. The most common AEs related to linifanib PK were hypertension (P = 0.02 for C_max and P = 0.01 for AUC), diarrhea (P = 0.001 for C_max and P = 0.0012 for AUC), proteinuria (P = 0.001 for C_max and P = 0.002 for AUC), and asthenia (P = 0.03 for AUC). Weight and sex were identified as covariates for C_max, and sex was identified as a covariate for AUC. The predicted AE range for females was slightly higher compared with males; however, the AE range is tighter for the weight range for fixed dosing compared with weight-based dosing, regardless of sex.

Conclusions

The PK properties of linifanib support a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Comparison of weight-based and fixed dosing revealed predicted AE rates to be similar, with a tighter AE range for fixed dosing. The safety profile of linifanib, therefore, supports a 17.5 mg fixed starting dose for Phase III clinical studies.     

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Eperisone Hydrochloride and Aceclofenac: A Randomized,Open-Label,Crossover Study of Healthy Korean Men

Background

Eperisone hydrochloride, a centrally acting muscle relaxant, is a calcium antagonist that causes vasodilation and antispastic actions. Aceclofenac, an anti-inflammatory analgesic and antipyretic drug, has similar efficacy and improved gastrointestinal tolerance compared with other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as diclofenac. Although eperisone hydrochloride and aceclofenac are frequently coadministered, no published studies have reported on the pharmacokinetic interactions between these 2 drugs.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate any pharmacokinetic interactions between eperisone hydrochloride and aceclofenac in healthy Korean men.

Methods

This was a randomized, open-label, crossover study. Each participant was randomly assigned to 1 of 6 treatment sequences and received eperisone hydrochloride (3 doses of 50 mg each), aceclofenac (2 doses of 100 mg each), or both as a single dose with a 7-day washout period between each dose. Blood samples were collected ≤24 hours after dosing, and plasma eperisone hydrochloride and aceclofenac concentrations were determined using validated LC/MS-MS. Pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted using noncompartmental methods. A safety profile was determined using the measurement of vital signs, ECG, and clinical laboratory tests.

Results

A total 24 of men were enrolled, and all completed the study. The geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of the C_max and AUC_0-∞ values for eperisone were 1.18 (0.828–1.673) and 1.12 (0.836–1.507), respectively. The geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of the C_max and AUC_0-∞ for aceclofenac were 0.93 (0.847–1.022) and 1.01 (0.979–1.036), respectively. A total of 7 adverse events were reported in 7 men. All adverse events were mild, and no significant differences were found between treatment groups.

Conclusion

No clinically significant pharmacokinetic differences exist between 150 mg eperisone hydrochloride and 200 mg aceclofenac when administrated as a monotherapy or in combination.     

Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Obeticholic Acid and Caffeine,Midazolam, Warfarin,Dextromethorphan, Omeprazole,Rosuvastatin, and Digoxin in Phase 1 Studies in Healthy Subjects

Introduction

Obeticholic acid (OCA), a potent and selective farnesoid X receptor agonist, is indicated for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). We investigated the potential drug–drug interaction effect of OCA on metabolic CYP450 enzymes and drug transporters.

Methods

Five phase 1 single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence, inpatient studies were conducted in healthy adult subjects to evaluate the effect of oral daily doses of 10 or 25 mg OCA on single-dose plasma pharmacokinetics of specific probe substrates for enzymes CYP1A2 (caffeine, R-warfarin), CYP3A (midazolam, R-warfarin), CYP2C9 (S-warfarin), CYP2D6 (dextromethorphan), CYP2C19 (omeprazole), and drug transporters, BCRP/OATP1B1/OATP1B3 (rosuvastatin), and P-gp (digoxin).

Results

OCA showed no substantial suppression/inhibition of S-warfarin, digoxin, and dextromethorphan and weak interactions with caffeine, omeprazole, rosuvastatin, and midazolam. The maximal pharmacodynamic responses (E _max) to warfarin-based INR, PT, and aPTT were reduced by 11%, 11%, and 1%, respectively, for the 10-mg dose group and by 7%, 7% and 0%, respectively, for the 25-mg dose group. Overall, drugs dosed in combination with OCA were well tolerated, and most adverse events were mild in severity. No clinically important trends were noted in laboratory evaluations, vital signs, or 12-lead ECGs.

Conclusion

In these studies, OCA showed weak to no suppression/inhibition of metabolic enzymes and drug transporters at the highest recommended therapeutic dose in patients with PBC. On the basis on these analyses, monitoring and maintenance of target INR range are required during coadministration of OCA with drugs that are metabolized by CYP1A2 (R-warfarin).

Funding

Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

     

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetic Properties,Bioavailability, and Tolerability of Two Lamivudine 100-mg Tablet Formulations: A Randomized Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects

Background

Lamivudine is used in the treatment of HIV and chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infections. Since 1999, at least 2 million Chinese HBV patients have been treated with lamivudine, but there are limited studies on the pharmacokinetics and safety of the drug in Chinese populations.

Objective

This study was designed to assess the bioequivalence of a newly developed lamivudine tablet (test drug) and a branded lamivudine tablet (reference drug) in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

Methods

A single-center, single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 28 healthy Chinese male volunteers. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the administration of oral lamivudine 100 mg in each period. Plasma lamivudine concentrations were analyzed by a validated LC–MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic and bioavailability parameters were calculated. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

Results

There were no significant differences in mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters between the test and reference drugs, including C_max (1239 [328.9] ng/mL vs 1176 [341.5] ng/mL), AUC_0–t (4096 [599.1] ng · h/mL vs 4064 [678.2] ng · h/mL), and AUC_0–∞ (4200 [607.7] ng · h/mL vs 4162 [672.2] ng · h/mL). The geometric mean test/reference ratios (90% CI) calculated for the log-transformed parameters were C_max, 1.06 (96.21–116.90); AUC_0–t, 1.01 (96.53–105.39); and AUC_0–∞, 1.01 (96.81–105.16), all of which were within the acceptance limits for bioequivalence. No serious AEs were reported, and all mild AEs were recovered quickly without treatment.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the test formulation of lamivudine 100 mg meets the FDA regulatory standards for bioequivalence with the reference formulation. Both formulations were well tolerated.     

Comparison of Pharmacokinetics of Two Fenofibrate Tablet Formulations in Healthy Human Subjects

Background

Fenofibrate is a serum lipid-lowering agent used as an adjunct to diet in patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. The new fenofibrate tablet formulation was developed as a pharmaceutical equivalent to the marketed tablet formulation containing 145 mg.

Objective

The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of 2 tablet formulations containing 145 mg of fenofibrate (CAS number 49562-28-9) in healthy human subjects.

Methods

The study was a randomized, 2-treatment, 3-period, 3-sequence, single-dose, 3-way crossover, partial replicate bioequivalence study in healthy human subjects under fasting conditions. Eligible subjects received each treatment in a crossover manner according to the randomization schedule. Replicate dosing was conducted for the reference formulation to determine its intrasubject variability. The predose blood sample was taken within 1 hour before dosing, and serial blood sampling was performed up to 72.0 hours’ postdose. The analysis of plasma samples for concentrations of fenofibric acid, the active metabolite of fenofibrate, was conducted by using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Bioequivalence was to be concluded if the 90% CIs as constructed were within the range of 80% to 125% for C_max, AUC_0–t, and AUC_0–∞ for fenofibric acid. Subjects were monitored for safety and tolerability throughout the study.

Results

15 healthy human subjects between 18 and 45 years of age and having body mass index between 18.5 and 30 kg/m² were recruited into the study. The 90% CIs for the test/reference mean ratios of the ln-transformed pharmacokinetic variables C_max, AUC_0–t, and AUC_0–∞ were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 80% to 125%. Both formulations were well tolerated after a single oral dose in these healthy male subjects.

Conclusions

Both fenofibrate tablet formulations demonstrated equivalent rates and extent of systemic absorption, and hence were considered bioequivalent.     

Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Properties of Ondansetron Administered Subcutaneously With Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase in Minipigs and Healthy Volunteers

Background

Subcutaneous ondansetron facilitated by recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) is an alternative for treating nausea/vomiting in patients who cannot receive ondansetron by other routes of administration.

Objective

Based on preclinical results in minipigs, a Phase I study was designed to assess the tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of subcutaneous ondansetron + rHuPH20 compared with intramuscular, intravenous, or oral ondansetron monotherapy in healthy volunteers.

Methods

In a crossover design, 3 minipigs were dosed with subcutaneous ondansetron 0.08 mg/kg + rHuPH20, or as intramuscular or intravenous monotherapy, for the evaluation of plasma ondansetron concentrations and local tolerability. In a randomized, open-label, 4-way crossover study, subjects received a randomized sequence of SC ondansetron 4 mg + rHuPH20, or ondansetron monotherapy IM (4 mg), IV (4 mg), or PO (8 mg), over 4 daily visits. Study participants included healthy volunteers aged 19 to 65 years with adequate venous access in both upper extremities and no history of QT-interval prolongation. Primary tolerability end points (administration-site observations, systemic adverse events [AEs], and subject-assessed pain) were assessed, and pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC, C_max, T_max, t_½) were computed to compare relative rate and extent of systemic exposure. Results were described using summary statistics, and bioequivalence was determined with a linear mixed-effects model.

Results

In the preclinical study, no adverse events or significant local reactions were observed. The C_max (45.8 ng/mL at 0.08 hour) with subcutaneous administration + rHuPH20 was 83% greater and was achieved 68% faster than with intramuscular administration (C_max = 25 ng/mL at 0.25 hour). In the clinical study, a total of 12 subjects (7 women, 5 men; white majority; mean age, 44.8) were randomized. The majority of AEs were at the injection site, mild in severity, and transient. After subcutaneous administration of ondansetron + rHuPH20, geometric mean C_max was 35% higher than with intramuscular ondansetron, 43% lower than with intravenous ondansetron, and 126% higher than with oral ondansetron (corrected for dose). Bioequivalence tests demonstrated that systemic exposure after subcutaneous administration was similar to that after intramuscular or intravenous administration and significantly greater than that after oral administration.

Conclusions

Subcutaneous ondansetron + rHuPH20 was generally well-tolerated. Subcutaneous dosing resulted in an extent of systemic exposure similar to that with intramuscular or intravenous dosing and greater than that with oral administration, and may be an option for clinical administration of ondansetron. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01572012.     

Assessment of Tacrolimus Absorption From the Human Intestinal Tract: Open-Label,Randomized, 4-Way Crossover Study

Background

Tacrolimus is an established immunosuppressant used for the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection in solid organ transplantation. An immediate-release oral formulation of tacrolimus has been commercially available since 1994 that is administered orally BID. To improve the compliance and quality of life of transplant patients, a once-daily modified release (MR) formulation is an attractive option. However, to be successful, the drug of interest must be sufficiently well absorbed from the distal region of the gastrointestinal tract.

Objective

To facilitate the development of an MR formulation, we investigated the absorption of tacrolimus from different regions of the human gastrointestinal tract, proximal and distal small bowels, and ascending colon.

Methods

The study was performed as an open-label, randomized, 4-way crossover design in 6 healthy white male subjects. For each subject, 1 mg (2 mg/mL) of tacrolimus solution in polyethylene glycol 400 was administered to each location in the gastrointestinal tract via a site-specific radiolabeled delivery capsule, which can release tacrolimus solution at specific sites of the gastrointestinal tract. Real-time visualization of capsule location and tacrolimus release at each target site was performed by using γ-scintigraphy. Blood samples were collected to determine tacrolimus levels in the blood. The pharmacokinetic parameters C_max, T_max after the capsule activation, AUC_0–24, and mean residence time were determined from the concentration–time profiles.

Results

Ten healthy male subjects underwent dosing. Six subjects completed all 4 treatments. Three adverse events (mild headache [n = 1], small amount of blood in stool [n = 1], and mild syncopal episode [n = 1]) that were possibly study drug related were reported in 3 different subjects. Tacrolimus was absorbed from not only the small intestine but also from the colonic region of the gastrointestinal tract. Although AUC_0–24 values revealed some site-specific absorption tendencies, the mean AUC_0–24 values obtained were similar regardless of the location of tacrolimus release from the capsule.

Conclusions

Tacrolimus was absorbed from the duodenum to the colon in these male subjects, although differences were observed in the value of AUC_0–24, possibly due to variation in cytochrome P450 3A4 activity in the intestine. Although this study was conducted in small group of healthy fasting men, the present results indicate that tacrolimus is suitable for MR formulation development due to a wide absorption window throughout the intestine in humans.     

Pharmacokinetic Properties and Bioequivalence of 2 Formulations of Valsartan 160-mg Tablets: A Randomized,Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Korean Male Volunteers

Background

The solubility of valsartan is dependent on pH and thus may cause patient variability in drug absorption and failure in bioequivalence studies; thus, increasing the solubility and release of valsartan at low pH has been suggested for a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile. However, due to this pH dependence, the change in the formulation process could alter the disintegration and/or dissolution profile of the drug, possibly making the results of bioequivalence studies misleading.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the bioavailability and tolerability of a newly developed oral formulation of valsartan 160 mg (wet-granulation tablet) in healthy Korean male volunteers.

Method

This study was performed with the subjects under fasted conditions, using a randomized, single-dose, 2-period crossover design. Subjects were assigned to receive, in randomized order, a single dose of the test formulation and a reference formulation (valsartan 160-mg dry-granulation tablet), with a washout period of 7 days between the administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after dosing, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined after the plasma valsartan concentration was analyzed using UPLC-MS/MS. The dissolution studies of both formulations were conducted using USP apparatus 2 at 50 rpm with 1000 mL of phosphate buffer solution (pH, 6.8) at 37°C ± 0.5°C. Bioequivalence was defined per Korean Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory criteria as 90% CIs of the geometric mean test/reference ratios of AUC_0–t and C_max within the range of 0.8 to 1.25. Tolerability was assessed using physical examination and subject interviews.

Results

Sixty subjects were enrolled (mean [SD] age [range], 23.6 [2.4] years [21–31]; height, 173.7 [6.6] cm [161–190]; and weight, 68.0 [8.7] kg [54–85]). The mean AUC_0–∞ values with the test and reference tablets were 31,784 (13,844) and 32,714 (14,512) ng·h/mL, respectively; C_max, 5094 (2061) and 5064 (1864) ng/mL; T_max, 2.92 (1.04) and 3.08 (1.01) hours. The 90% CIs for the geometric mean test/reference ratios of AUC_0–t and C_max were 0.9295 to 1.0546 and 0.9190 to 1.0848, respectively, which met the criteria for bioequivalence. The most frequently reported adverse event was dizziness after blank blood sampling, recorded in 4 subjects, 2 cases each with the test and reference formulations.

Conclusions

In this study in healthy Korean male volunteers, the test and reference formulations of 160-mg valsartan met the Korean Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory criteria for bioequivalence despite the difference in formulation (wet granulation vs dry granulation). Both formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported.