本科护生专业承诺在领悟社会支持与学习投入间的中介效应

目的探讨专业承诺在本科护生领悟社会支持与学习投入间的中介作用。方法采用方便抽样法,于2019年4月选取安徽省4所医学院校本科护生768名为研究对象。采用一般资料调查表、领悟社会支持量表、大学生专业承诺量表、大学生学习投入问卷对其进行调查。采用SPSS 23.0和AMOS 24.0软件进行数据分析,单因素分析采用t检验、方差分析及Pearson相关分析,变量间关系模型采用结构方程模型进行验证。结果本研究共发放问卷768份,回收有效问卷720份,有效回收率为93.75%。720名本科护生学习投入问卷总分(3.31±0.49)分。不同性别(t=-2.210)、年级(F=6.822)、是否为学生干部(t=3.595)、就读意愿(F=3.243)的本科护生学习投入总分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。领悟社会支持对专业承诺(β=0.40,P<0.01)和学习投入(β=0.13,P<0.01)均具有正向预测作用;专业承诺对学习投入有正向预测作用(β=0.71,P<0.01),专业承诺在领悟社会支持与学习投入间有部分中介作用。结论本科护生领悟社会支持可以通过专业承诺间接影响学习投入,护理教育工作者应采取多种方式加强护生社会支持,提高专业承诺水平,促进护生学习投入。     

护理专业学生人文教育需求状况的调查分析

护理院校必须重视对学生的人文教育,培养兼具专业素质和人文素质的护理人才,以适应社会进步和护理学科发展的需要。了解护理专业学生对人文教育的满意度及需求状况,对护理院校有针对性地培养高素质护理人才具有重要意义。鉴此,笔者对初进入临床实习的部分护生进行调查研究,旨在描述和分析不同层次护生人文素质教育需求情况,现报道如下。对象与方法1.研究对象。对福建省6所院校在某三甲医院实习的护理专业护生进行调查,参与调查的护生均已完成在校课程学习,临床实习1个月。共发放问卷195份,实际收回有效问卷190份,有效回收率为97.4%。2.调查…     

本科男护生专业心理压力源分析与对策

目的 分析引起不同学习阶段男护生专业心理压力的因素及所采取心理压力应对方式,探讨解决问题的有效途径,促进男护生的身心健康发展.方法 采用压力应付方式问卷及自制护生专业心理压力调查问卷,对某省属医科大学护理学院2005至2008级在校本科男护生共102名进行"护生专业心理压力调查问卷"和"压力应付方式问卷"的调查.结果 护理专业男护生存在中度专业心理压力,且各年级男护生专业心理压力存在差异,其中二年级男护生专业心理压力较其他年级学生低.护理专业本科男护生的压力应付方式均为成熟型,即采用"解决问题-求助"方式,其中二年级学生采用解决问题方式多于其他年级学生.结论 应纠正社会对男性护理人员的偏见;根据不同学习阶段学生的特点开展专业思想教育,减轻心理压力,正确引导男护生实现角色转换.     

一类本科护生实习期专业思想与成绩调查分析与对策

目的:调查一类本科护生专业思想稳定性的现状,分析原因,并针对性采取措施。方法:自行设计"实习护生职业思想及规划"调查问卷对157名一类本科及非一类本科护生进行现场调查,针对调查结果采取了"叙事疗法"等系列人性化的专业思想教育措施。结果:一类本科护生更不满意自己的专业,对护理职业未来发展的信心度低于非一类本科护生;实习中理论成绩及行为表现两者比较差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.01);结论:被学生内在思想、情感所认同、接受的人性化教育方式是有效的专业思想教育方式。     

本科护生不确定压力与职业自我效能的相关性研究

目的探讨本科护生职业自我效能的现状,分析不确定压力对护生职业自我效能的影响。方法采取整群便利抽样法,2020年4月10—17日,选取浙江省4所高校1526名护理本科生为研究对象。采用护生一般情况问卷、护生职业自我效能问卷(PSQNS)及不确定压力问卷对其进行横断面调查。采用多重线性回归分析护生职业自我效能的影响因素。共发放问卷1526份,回收有效问卷1474份,有效回收率为96.6%。结果1474名本科护生PSQNS总分为(91.10±14.11)分,条目均分为(3.37±0.52)分,得分率为67.48%,处于中等水平。多重线性回归分析结果显示,护理专业喜爱程度、不确定压力、在校学业成绩、选择护理专业原因及家庭经济状况是本科护生职业自我效能的影响因素(P<0.05),可解释33.4%的变异。结论本科护生的职业自我效能有待提升;护理教育者可以通过降低护生的不确定压力,提高其职业自我效能。     

护理专业学生情绪智力现状及分析

目的了解护理专业在校学生的情绪智力状况。方法采用问卷调查法对两所学校护理专业不同学历层次学生的情绪智力进行了调查。结果收回有效问卷233份,护理专业学生的情绪智力总体水平不高,情绪智力得分上,专科护生得分最高,本科护生次之,中专护生最低（P〈0．01）。结论应加强护生情绪智力的培养。     

护生社会胜任力状况的调查分析

[目的]了解护生的社会胜任力状况。[方法]采用问卷调查法,自行设计"实习护生专业认识问卷调查表"和"实习护生社会适应性问卷调查表",对254名护生进行护生社会胜任力状况调查。[结果]护生对自己的专业认可度较低,认为护理专业的学识深度不及其他医疗专业;39.1%护生不善于表达自己的思想与情感,35.9%护生情绪调节能力较差,34.5%护生认为多数人是自私的,42.9%护生认为自己综合素质位于中上等。[结论]护生的专业认知和社会适应性与护士职业素质要求异质性较强;培养护生良好的情绪调节与自控能力、加强护生的专业思想和专业知识教育等,是提高护生社会胜任力的必要途径。     

应用SF-36量表测量护生的生命质量研究

目的:测量并比较不同层次护生的生命质量,提出改善以及应对的建议。方法:利用SF-36量表对不同层次的护生进行生命质量的自评调查,并针对调查结果进行定性访谈。结果:共发出问卷104份,收回有效问卷99份。SF-36量表各领域Cronbach’sα系数多数位于0.65～0.85范围内,多数领域间的相关系数小于0.4。护生生命质量在VT、MH领域得分最低,PF领域得分最高;二年制大专班护生的VT领域得分显著高于五年制本科班(P=0.016),其余领域得分差异无统计学意义。定性访谈发现VT、MH领域得分较低的原因主要是各种压力过大、应对方式单一等。结论:应用SF-36量表测量护生的生命质量具有较高的信度、效度,护生的生命质量不容乐观,应针对某些领域给予特殊关照。     

护生在临床实习中遭拒绝情况调查分析

目的通过调查临床护理实习生在临床实习工作中遭患者拒绝的情况,分析护生被拒绝的原因,引导学生正确面对被拒绝。方法 2011年5月-6月采用自制调查问卷对实习8个月以上的护生进行调查。结果 87.5%的护生在实习中遭遇过患者的拒绝,患者和家属的不信任是护生遭遇被拒绝的主要原因,多数护生在被患者拒绝后有不良情绪及消极应对。结论护生应加强基本知识和基本技能的学习,提高沟通交流技巧,带教老师要注意护生情商的培养,给予护生正面积极的鼓励才能使护生正确面对患者的拒绝。     

不同年段本科护生专业认可度的对比分析与干预

本科护士是一群高素质的护理团队,这一队逐渐兴起的高素质人才对本专业的认知与认可明显高于其它的低层次学历的护士。那么本科护生的专业认可度在不断深入专业知识学习中是否有较大的变化呢?为此,笔者对不同年段本科护生专业认可度进行调查和对比分析,以期能为促进高等护理教育发展与提升本科护生综合素质提供干预依据。1资料与方法1.1一般资料浙江湖州师范学院医学院本科大一、大三护理学生各50名,年龄20~23岁,均为女生。1.2方法采用问卷无记名调查方法,问卷由笔者自行设计,发放问卷共100份,实际收回有效问卷100份,有效回收率为100%。问卷…     

护理本科生对护理专业认知的调查与分析

目的:了解和分析护理专业本科生对护理专业认知及其变化,找出学生获得护理专业信息来源的途径,以期为建立科学的、有针对性的护理专业情感教育实施方案,为改进课程设置提供依据。方法:对我院2002级护理专业本科生进行问卷调查,包括护生入校志愿选择及其影响因素,对护理专业一般知识和护理工作内容认识,及其获得护理专业信息来源三方面。调查时间分别在第一学年入校后一周内和第二学年开学后第一周内。结果:入校初对护理专业感兴趣的学生仅占2.9%,有64.7%的学生没有认识到护理是一门专业。经过一年学习,有90%以上的护生明确了护士需要为病人提供心理支持、健康教育和咨询,并参与科研、教学、管理等工作,有412%护生认为获得护理专业信息主要是通过专题教育。结论:护生入校一年后对护理专业的一般知识和护理工作内容的认识有明显提高。     

Nursing students assess nursing education.

This study assessed the characteristics of nursing students currently enrolled in nursing education programs, how students finance their nursing education, their plans for clinical practice and graduate education, and the rewards and difficulties of being a nursing student. Data are from a survey administered to a national sample of 496 nursing students. The students relied on financial aid and personal savings and earnings to finance their education. Parents, institutional scholarships, and government loans are also important sources, but less than 15% of the students took out bank loans. Nearly one quarter of the students, particularly younger and minority students, plan to enroll in graduate school immediately after graduation and most want to become advanced nursing practitioners. Most of the nursing students (88%) are satisfied with their nursing education and nearly all (95%) provided written answers to two open-ended questions. Comments collapsed into three major categories reflecting the rewards (helping others, status, and job security) and three categories reflecting the difficulties (problems with balancing demands, quality of nursing education, and the admissions process) of being a nursing student. Implications for public policymaking center on expanding the capacity of nursing education programs, whereas schools themselves should focus on addressing the financial needs of students, helping them strike a balance among their school, work, and personal/family responsibilities and modifying certain aspects of the curriculum.     

Culture and diversity in the nursing classroom: an impact on communication and learning

This article discusses culture and diversity in the nursing classroom and its impact on communication and learning. Today's nursing classrooms are heavily populated with students from many ethnic, psychological and sociocultural backgrounds. It is necessary that nurse educators recognize that many communication patterns value diversity, and is a major support in many learning styles of their students. Without a thorough understanding of diversity and communication among cultures, major challenges exist for both professors and students. The nursing curriculum and classroom materials should portray diversity so that all subject matter reflects a range of cultural perspectives. Higher education curricula are probably the most diverse in the world, and with a global perspective, and the United States being a "melting pot," these curricula will become even more diverse in the future. Nursing education has the responsibility to teach students how to communicate on a global scale. These global models of communication will assist students to successfully enter professional nursing practice with strong communication skills and a level of cultural competence that professional nurses need to know.     

High school students of color tell us what nursing and college mean to them

Excepts from application essays of urban public high school sophomores of color enrolled in Choose Nursing!,© a precollegiate nursing career development program, illustrate their clear, insightful, and positive perceptions of nursing. The hospital-based program received 187 applications over a 4-year period. It enrolled 61 students and graduated 40, all of whom matriculated at 4-year colleges; 36 declared a nursing major. Based on application and other student essays, as well as data used for formative evaluation, the author suggests that efforts to recruit urban students of color for baccalaureate nursing education should be school focused and built on the positive perceptions and strong interest in nursing and collegiate education held by many students. Promising ways to engage and support interested students while they still have time to meet college and nursing prerequisites are integrated within the discussion, as is the value of hands-on experience in a “nursing” role in motivating students to persist in reaching their goals.     

Longitudinal study of Finnish nursing students' preferences for knowledge in nursing practice

The curriculum of Finnish nursing education is based on nursing science. The aim is to educate nursing students to internalize the logic, concepts and major subject areas of nursing science. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to examine Finnish nursing students' knowledge base of nursing after 6, 18 and 30 months of education and at the end of the degree programme. The study group consisted of 158 students selected by means of stratified sampling from the six specialities of Finnish nursing education programs. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire from 26 institutes. A factor analysis of 21 items was done, where three factors emerged. The summarized variables based on the factors were subjected to one-way analysis of variance to elucidate the differences between the six groups of students. The students prioritized biomedical knowledge. Knowledge of diseases and anatomy was preferred to the other knowledge areas. The students also valued psychological knowledge. Nursing knowledge was the least preferred knowledge area at every phase of education. The students of the different specialities preferred knowledge areas congruent with the nursing practice of their speciality.     

中专升高职护理专业课程设置的相关研究

目的 比较中专护理和中专直升高职护理专业的课程设置,探讨中专直升高职护理专业课程设置的最佳方案.方法 研究比较现行的中专护理及专科护理的教学计划,并对2001、2002级我校中专直升高职护理的学生进行问卷调查分析.结果 中专护理课程与中专直升高职护理专科的课程设置结构相似,缺乏新意,内容重复,未能体现高护的特色.结论 中专直升高职护理专业应尽快改革课程设置,调整教学内容,使该类学生通过3年的高校学习,真正全面提高素质及业务水平,以满足现代护理工作需求.     

Clinical Scholar Model: providing excellence in clinical supervision of nursing students.

The Clinical Scholar Model (CSM) is a practice-education partnership focused on improving the outcomes of clinical nursing education by bridging the academic and service settings. An expert clinical nurse serves as a clinical scholar (CS) to coordinate, supervise, and evaluate the clinical education of nursing students in collaboration with school of nursing faculty. This article describes the model's evolution, how the model is differentiated from traditional clinical instruction roles and responsibilities, and the benefits to the collaborating clinical agency and school of nursing.     

不同类型护理本科生评判性思维能力调查与思考

目的：探讨和分析不同类型护理本科生的评判性思维能力的现状,为护理教学改革提供基础资料。方法：使用CCTDI量表对护理本科生、该学院护理专升本、其他院校护理专升本学生233名进行问卷调查。结果：①本科生和专升本学生的评判性思维能力总分（243.37±25.50）及各子条目得分（30～40）偏低。②本科生的评判性思维的自信心得分较专升本学生得分高,两者比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。③其他院校专升本学生寻找真相得分较该学院专升本学生得分高,两者比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：护理本科生评判性思维能力偏低。应合理配置护理专业课程,改进教学方法,加强师资评判性思维能力的培训以不断提高护理本科生的评判性思维能力。     

不同年级男性护理本科生专业态度的调查

目的了解男性护理本科生（以下简称男护生）专业态度现状并比较不同年级男护生专业态度的差异,为目前的护理专业教育措施提供建议。方法参考相关文献自行设计调查问卷,并在同一时间内对3个年级共85名男护生的专业态度及其相关因素进行调查。结果不同年级男护生在是否喜欢护理专业和是否会转专业两方面的比较,经统计学分析。均P〈0．05,差异有统计学意义;就业好是影响男护生专业态度最重要的正面因素;专业社会地位低是影响男护生专业态度最重要的负面因素。结论男护生专业态度不稳定,加强男护生的专业思想教育,探索男护生的培养和使用模式是巩固男护生专业态度的有效途径。