Factors affecting the binding of disopyramide to serum proteins

We investigated the influence of the following factors on the binding of disopyramide to serum proteins: method of drug quantification [enzyme immunoassay (EMIT) compared with liquid chromatography (HPLC)], separation technique (ultrafiltration vs equilibrium dialysis), temperature, pH, and total concentration of disopyramide. EMIT and HPLC measurements of disopyramide in ultrafiltrates prepared from 50 sera agreed well: EMIT = 1.046 HPLC + 0.042, (r = 0.928, SEE = 0.04 mg/L). Free disopyramide concentrations in ultrafiltrates of dialyzed sera were similar to those measured in the corresponding dialysates by the EMIT method for 30 patients' sera: ultrafiltrate of serum retentate = 1.053 dialysate + 0.042. Concentrations of free [14C]disopyramide were little affected by temperature. The concentration of free disopyramide decreased as the pH was increased from 7.0 to 7.8. The concentration of free disopyramide, as determined by ultrafiltration, is strongly and directly related to total drug concentration. In the sera of 50 cardiac patients receiving chronic therapy with disopyramide and with total disopyramide concentrations of 0.5 to 5.8 mg/L, the proportion of free disopyramide ranged from 16 to 54%.     

Low Dose Disopyramide Often Fails to Prevent Neurogenic Syncope During Head-Up Tilt Testing

Low dose disopyramide has been used to prevent neurally-mediated syncope during head-up tilt testing but a correlation between blood levels and efficacy has not been described. We measured disopyramide levels in 15 patients with recurrent syncope and positive 70° head-up tilt tests who underwent one or more repeat tests on the drug. There were 9 males and 6 females, age range 15–78 years. Fourteen of the 15 patients had structurally normal hearts. The daily disopyramide dose was 645 ± 165 mg (mean ± SD). Patients developed syncope during 9 tests and had no syncope during 12 tests. The mean disopyramide level in patients with positive tests was significantly lower than the level in patients with negative tests (2.4 ± 0.15 μ/mL vs 3.2 ± 0.22 μ/mL, P = 0.018). Six patients were tested twice on different disopyramide doses. Five of these six patients had syncope during head-up tilt testing on the lower dose and negative tests on the higher dose (disopyramide levels 2.2 μ 0.17 μ/mL vs 3.2 μ0.17 fi/mL, P = 0.004). Thus, disopyramide is effective in preventing neurogenic syncope during head-up tilt testing, but higher blood levels are often necessary for efficacy. In a given patient, failure to respond to low dose disopyramide does not preclude success on higher doses.     

阿奇霉素对地高辛血药浓度的影响

目的 探讨阿奇霉素对地高辛血药浓度的影响.方法长期口服地高辛且血药浓度稳定在0.5～2.0 ng/mL的心力衰竭患者316例,其中158例纳入试验组(口服或静脉滴注阿奇霉素),余下158例纳入对照组(未接受阿奇霉素治疗);酶放大免疫法测定试验组使用阿奇霉素前后的外周血地高辛浓度,并与对照组进行比较.结果 试验组患者在使用阿奇霉素5 d后地高辛血药浓度由(1.1±0.5)ng/mL升高至(1.5±0.5)ng/mL(P<0.05),大于2.0 ng/mL者13例(占8.2%);老年(≥60岁)患者地高辛浓度增高尤其明显(P<0.01).试验组地高辛浓度为(1.5±0.5)ng/mL,高于对照组的(1.1±0.3)ng/mL(P<0.05).结论 阿奇霉素可导致地高辛血药浓度升高,尤其是老年患者;应避免同时使用阿奇霉素和地高辛,减少毒性反应.     

Serum disopyramide concentrations and suppression of ventricular premature contractions

Serum disopyramide determinations and 24-hour Holter monitoring were performed in 20 cardiac subjects with ventricular premature contractions (VPCs) after the first, seventeenth, and thirty-seventh doses of disopyramide, 100 mg (10 subjects; low-dose group) or 200 mg (10 subjects; high-dose group) every 6 hr for 10 days to assess the ability of single- or first-dose data to predict serum disopyramide concentrations at steady state and the relationship between steady-state serum disopyramide concentrations and VPC suppression. Control Holter recordings were made for 48 hr in each subject. There were strong correlations in both groups between data for the AUC over 0 to 6 hr for the first dose (AUC60) and average (C ss) and trough (C min) steady-rate serum disopyramide concentrations after the seventeenth and thirty-seventh doses and the two combined. C ss and C min were related to AUC60 by the following expressions for both dosage groups: C ss = 0.22 AUC60 + 0.90 and C min = 0.20 AUC60 + 0.70. There were good correlations between 6-hr serum disopyramide concentration after the first dose and C ss and C min. There was strong correlation between overall average steady-state serum disopyramide concentration and suppression of VPC frequency. The relationship between VPC suppression and overall average trough serum disopyramide concentration at steady state, on the other hand, was weak.     

Electrophysiological effects of sodium channel blockers on guinea pig left atrium.

The electrophysiological effects of five sodium channel blockers (mexiletine, lidocaine, disopyramide, aprindine and flecainide) on the guinea pig left atrium were investigated by recording the action potential and its maximum rate of rise (Vmax). The onset and offset kinetics of use-dependent block of Vmax were analyzed. Lidocaine, aprindine and flecainide were classified clearly as fast, intermediate and slow, respectively. Mexiletine and disopyramide had two components in onset and offset of use-dependent block. Mexiletine showed fast and intermediate kinetics, whereas disopyramide showed intermediate and slow kinetics. Action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD) was prolonged by disopyramide and mexiletine. The other drugs did not change the action potential duration. Effective refractory period was prolonged by all drugs with relative potency in the following order: disopyramide greater than mexiletine greater than lidocaine greater than aprindine = flecainide. In conclusion, the modes of actions of sodium channel blockers on the atrium were disclosed to be different from those on the ventricle. The pharmacological therapy for atrial arrhythmias should be based on the electrophysiological effects of the drugs on the atrium, not on the ventricle.     

ORAL DISOPYRAMIDE DOSAGE REGIMES IN ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE

The serum concentration/time profiles resulting from two oral disopyramide dosage regimes were studied in ten patients with ischaemic heart disease. Conventional dosing on a 6 or 8 hourly basis consistently achieved disopyramide concentrations within the accepted therapeutic range of 2–7 μg/ml. In contrast, a twice daily regime was associated in some patients with trough levels below the minimum effective concentration. The mean elimination half-life was 58 h; this does not substantiate previous reports of significantly prolonged disopyramide half-lives in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Unless significant renal impairment or cardiac failure is present, or a sustained release preparation is used, the dosage interval for oral disopyramide should not exceed 8 h.     

DISOPYRAMIDE-INDUCED HYPOGLYCEMIA: CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Disopyramide is a group I antiarrhythmic drug which is mainly used for the treatment of ventricular and supraventricular rhythm disturbances. Commonest side effects result from disopyramide's anticholinergic activity. Other side effects such as hypoglycemia have been reported less frequently. We report one observation of disopyramide induced hypoglycemia, and a review of the literature is presented. Including our observation, 14 cases (9 men and 5 women, aged from 41 to 88) have so far been reported. Doses of disopyramide ranged from 200 to 1,200 mg per day, administered from one day to one year. Symptomatology was mainly neurologic (12 patients) and two patients were clinically asymptomatic. The outcome was favorable in all but the 2 patients who died with persistent hypoglycemia after a single dose of 250 mg in one patient and after 400 mg daily during 4 days in the other (without stopping the drug). Renal function was markedly impaired in 9 patients, two of these patients being on a long term dialysis therapy. Blood levels of disopyramide were measured in 7 patients and ranged from 1 to 11.4 ng/ml. In five patients it was in the normal range (1-4 ng/ml). Three patients were rechallenged for disopyramide: hypoglycemia occurred in all, without clinical symptoms in two of them. The main risk factors of disopyramide induced hypoglycemia are a preexisting chronic renal failure, advanced age, and malnutrition. In these patients normally non toxic disopyramide blood levels, as defined in normal subjects, seem to be inappropriately high. We suggest that in patients at risk, disopyramide blood levels should be maintained at the lower range of therapeutic level.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Total and free disopyramide by fluorescence polarization immunoassay and relationship between free fraction and alpha-1 acid glycoprotein

Disopyramide is an antiarrhythmic drug with concentration dependent protein binding within the therapeutic range. We found good agreement between fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA, Abbott TDX) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for total disopyramide among 27 admission patients' sera (FPIA = 1.12 (HPLC) -0.002, r = 0.982, SEE = 0.378 mg/l). Agreement between FPIA and HPLC for free disopyramide was similarly good (FPIA = 0.867 (HPLC) -0.003, r = 0.986, SEE = 0.09 mg/l, n = 27). Serum alpha 1 acid glycoprotein concentration (AAG) and free fraction (FF) percent of disopyramide correlated inversely (FF = -0.0112 (AAG) + 31.3 r = 0.707, SEE = 6.41 mg/l, n = 24), and the free disopyramide fraction varied greatly. For two pooled sera with 12 different disopyramide concentrations (range from 0.5-20.0 mg/l), the proportion of free fraction ranged from 6.5 to 73.2%. Overall, we found the free disopyramide fraction variable with each individual, total drug, and protein concentration. Therefore, free drug concentration should be monitored in disopyramide therapy, and FPIA is reliable for free as well as total drug assay.     

Tolerability of azithromycin as malaria prophylaxis in adults in northeast papua,indonesia

Drug tolerability affects compliance. We evaluated the tolerability levels of azithromycin (750-mg loading dose plus 250 mg/day; n = 148 subjects), doxycycline (100 mg/day; n = 75), and placebo (n = 77) as prophylaxis against malaria in Indonesian adults over 20 weeks. Self-reported and elicited symptoms, health perception, hearing, hematology, and biochemistry were assessed. The loading dose was well tolerated. The frequencies (number per person-years [p-yr]) of all daily reported symptoms were similar in the three arms of the study: 40.2/p-yr for azithromycin, 39.7/p-yr for doxycycline, and 38.2/p-yr for placebo. Relative to those who received placebo, azithromycin recipients complained more often of heartburn (rate ratio = 10.5 [95% confidence interval, 2.8 to 88.1]), paresthesia (2.03 [1.08 to 4.24]), and mild (1.55 [1.01 to 2.48]) and severe (11.2 [1.34 to infinity ]) itching but less often of fever (0.21 [0.09 to 0.49]) and tinnitus (0.09 [0.04 to 0.21]). Azithromycin recipients showed no evidence of clinical hearing loss or hematologic, hepatic, or renal toxicity. One azithromycin recipient developed an erythematous rash. Daily azithromycin was well tolerated by these Indonesian adults during 20 weeks of treatment.     

Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of desloratadine and fexofenadine when coadministered with azithromycin: a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study

BACKGROUND: Significant cardiac toxicity has been associated with some older antihistamines (eg, terfenadine and astemizole) when their plasma concentrations are increased. There is thus a need for a thorough assessment of the cardiac safety of newer antihistamine compounds. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the effects of coadministration of desloratadine or fexofenadine with azithromycin on pharmacokinetic parameters, tolerability, and electrocardiographic (ECG) findings. METHODS: Healthy volunteers aged 19 to 46 years participated in this randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, third-party-blind, multiple-dose study. Subjects received desloratadine 5 mg once daily, fexofenadine 60 mg twice daily, or placebo for 7 days. An azithromycin loading dose (500 mg) followed by azithromycin 250 mg once daily for 4 days was administered concomitantly starting on day 3. Group 1 received desloratadine and azithromycin, group 2 received desloratadine and placebo, group 3 received placebo and azithromycin, group 4 received fexofenadine and azithromycin, and group 5 received fexofenadine and placebo. RESULTS: The results of the pharmacokinetic analysis revealed little change in mean maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values for desloratadine with concomitant administration of azithromycin: Cmax ratio, 115% (90% CI, 92-144); AUC, ratio 105% (90% CI, 82-134). The corresponding ratios for 3-hydroxydesloratadine were 115% (90% CI, 98-136) and 104% (90% CI, 88-122), respectively. A substantial increase was observed in mean Cmax and AUC values for fexofenadine when administered with azithromycin: Cmax, ratio, 169% (90% CI, 120-237); AUC ratio, 167% (90% CI, 122-229). Compared with the group receiving desloratadine and azithromycin, subjects receiving fexofenadine and azithromycin also displayed greater variability in pharmacokinetic parameters for the antihistamine. Mean Cmax and AUC values of azithromycin were slightly higher when administered with desloratadine (Cmax ratio, 131% [90% CI, 92-187]; AUC ratio, 112% [90% CI, 83-153]) but were lower when given in combination with fexofenadine (Cmax ratio, 87% [90% CI, 61-124]; AUC ratio, 88% [90% CI, 65-1201). The most common adverse event for all regimens was headache, reported in 20 (22%) subjects. All combinations of desloratadine or fexofenadine with and without azithromycin were well tolerated, and no statistically significant changes in PR, QT, or QT, interval, QRS complex, or ventricular rate were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Small increases (<15%) in mean pharmacokinetics of desloratadine were observed with coadministration of azithromycin. By contrast, peak fexofenadine concentrations were increased by 69% and the AUC was increased by 67% in the presence of the azalide antibiotic. Based on the reported adverse-events profile and the absence of changes in ECG parameters, the combination of desloratadine and azithromycin was well tolerated. This study suggests that desloratadine has a more favorable drug-interaction potential than does fexofenadine.