Evaluation of the automated collection and extended storage of apheresis platelets in additive solution

BACKGROUND: Collecting apheresis platelets (PLTs) into additive solution has many potential benefits. The new Trima software (Version 6.0, CaridianBCT) allows automated addition of PLT additive solution (PAS) after collection, compared to Trima Version 5.1, which only collects PLTs into plasma. The aim of this study was to compare PLT quality during extended storage, after collection with the different Trima systems. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Apheresis PLTs were collected using both Trima Accel apheresis systems. The test PLT units (n = 12) were collected using the new Trima Version 6.0 into PLT AS (PAS‐IIIM), while the control units (n = 8) were collected into autologous plasma using Trima Version 5.1. All units were stored for 9 days, and in vitro cell quality variables were evaluated during this time. RESULTS: PLTs collected in PAS‐IIIM maintained a stable pH between 7.2 and 7.4, whereas plasma‐stored apheresis units exhibited significantly increased acidity during storage, due to lactate accumulation and bicarbonate exhaustion. Plasma‐stored PLTs also demonstrated a more rapid consumption of glucose. However, there was little difference in PLT activation or cytokine secretion between PAS‐IIIM and control PLTs. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that apheresis PLT concentrates collected in PAS‐IIIM, using Trima Version 6.0 software, maintained acceptable PLT metabolic and cellular characteristics until Day 9 of storage.     

Evaluation of the tolerability and immunogenicity of ultraviolet C‐irradiated autologous platelets in a dog model

BACKGROUND: The THERAFLEX ultraviolet (UV) platelets (PLTs) pathogen reduction system for PLT concentrates (PCs) operates using ultraviolet C (UVC) light at a wavelength of 254 nm. UVC treatment can potentially alter proteins, which may affect drug tolerance in humans and influence the immunogenicity of blood products. This preclinical study in beagle dogs was designed to evaluate the safety pharmacology of UVC‐irradiated PCs after intravenous administration and to determine whether they are capable of eliciting humoral responses to PLTs and plasma proteins. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Six beagle dogs each were transfused once every other week for 10 weeks with UVC‐irradiated or nonirradiated PCs. All PCs were autologous canine single‐donor products prepared from whole blood. Safety pharmacology variables were regularly assessed. The impact of UVC irradiation on PLT and plasma proteomes was analyzed by one‐ and two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis. Serum samples were tested for UVC‐induced antibodies by Western blot and flow cytometry. RESULTS: Dogs transfused with UVC‐irradiated PCs showed no signs of local or systemic intolerance. Few but significant changes in PLT protein integrity were observed after UVC irradiation. Even after repeated administration of UVC‐irradiated PCs, no antibodies against UVC‐exposed plasma or PLT proteins were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated transfusions of autologous UVC‐treated PCs were well tolerated in all dogs studied. UVC irradiation did not cause significant plasma or PLT protein modifications capable of inducing specific antibody responses in the dogs. High‐resolution proteomics combined with antibody analysis introduces a comprehensive and sensitive method for screening of protein modifications and antibodies specific for pathogen reduction treatment.     

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of apheresis platelets stored for 5 days in 65% platelet additive solution/35% plasma

BACKGROUND: In the United States, apheresis platelets (PLTs) are suspended in autologous plasma. PLT additive solutions, long used in Europe, decrease recipient allergic reactions and may reduce the risk of transfusion‐related acute lung injury. We evaluated Amicus‐collected PLTs stored in platelet additive solution (PAS) III (InterSol) for 5 days. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In Study 1, 71 subjects donated two products on a single day—one each stored in 100% plasma or 65% PAS III/35% plasma. Products underwent standard in vitro testing on Days 1 and 5. In Study 2, 43 additional subjects provided Amicus products stored for 5 days in 65% PAS III/35% plasma for in vivo radiolabeled recovery and survival determinations. The effect of approximately 2500 cGy Day 1 gamma irradiation was evaluated in a subset of products. RESULTS: PAS III PLTs (n = 70) had a median Day 5 pH_22°C of 7.2 (lower 95%, 95% tolerance limit, 6.9). Mean Day 5 recovery and survival of radiolabeled PAS III PLTs (n = 33) were, respectively, 80.5 and 72.1%, of fresh autologous PLTs. With 95% confidence, these values were at least 66% of fresh PLT recovery and 58% of survival. All in vitro variables remained within ranges seen in licensed products for irradiated and nonirradiated PAS III PLTs. CONCLUSION: Leukoreduced Amicus PLTs stored in 65% PAS III/35% plasma in PL‐2410 containers maintained pH ≥ 6.9 throughout 5 days' storage. Radiolabeled PLT recovery and survival values met US Food and Drug Administration statistical criteria. Gamma‐irradiated PAS III PLTs demonstrated no significant adverse effects due to irradiation in in vitro testing.     

Functional characteristics of buffy-coat PLTs photochemically treated with amotosalen-HCl for pathogen inactivation

BACKGROUND: One blood system for PLTs (INTERCEPT, Baxter Transfusion Therapies) is based on photochemical treatment (PCT) with small molecules that target cross-link nucleic acids (Helinx technology, Cerus Corp.) with amotosalen-HCl (S-59) and UVA light (320-400 nm) to inactivate pathogens and WBCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A two-arm in vitro study was conducted to compare pooled buffy-coat-derived PLT concentrates (PCs) treated with the INTERCEPT blood system, resuspended in PLT additive solution (PAS) III (InterSol, Baxter Transfusion Therapies), and stored for up to 7 days (test units, n = 20) with unpaired, nontreated PCs, resuspended in PAS II (T-Sol, Baxter Transfusion Therapies), and prepared at the same center in the same manner (control units, n = 18). RESULTS: PLT dose (x 1011/unit +/- SD) on Day 1 immediately following PCT was 3.0 +/- 0.4 for test units and 3.2 +/- 0.4 for control units. After 7 days of storage, the pH of all test units was maintained above 6.8. No marked trend was observed in the hypotonic shock response (HSR). Values among study groups were similar at the end of observation period: 68 +/- 11 percent for control unites versus 67 +/- 8 percent for test units (p > 0.05). Aggregation response to ristocetin was slightly lower in test units: at Day 7, 65 +/- 10 percent versus 76 +/- 6 percent (p < 0.05). Significantly higher (p < 0.001) glucose consumption, lactate production, and CD62P expression were observed in test units. CONCLUSION: Compared to nontreated PLTs, the PCT process was associated with a variety of differences of in vitro analyses. Although significant, these changes were relatively small in most cases. Characteristics correlated with survival in vivo such as HSR and swirling were comparable between both study groups, indicating that the viability of the majority of cells appears to have persisted throughout 7 days of storage. The impact of this finding, however, remains to be investigated in clinical trials performed with 7-day stored PLTs.     

A randomized controlled trial evaluating recovery and survival of 6% dimethyl sulfoxide–frozen autologous platelets in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND: Availability of platelets (PLTs) is severely limited by shelf life in some settings. Our objective was to determine and compare to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria the PLT recovery and survival of autologous PLTs cryopreserved at ?65°C or less in 6% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) reconstituted with a no‐wash method (cryopreserved PLTs [CPPs]) compared to autologous fresh PLTs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, Phase I study analyzing PLT viability and in vitro function in consenting healthy subjects. Apheresis PLTs (APs) were collected in plasma. APs were suspended in 6% DMSO, concentrated, and placed at not more than ?65°C for 7 to 13 days. Frozen CPPs were thawed at 37°C and resuspended into 25 mL of 0.9% NaCl. Control PLTs (fresh autologous) and CPPs were labeled with ¹¹¹In or ⁵¹Cr, and recovery and survival after reinfusion were determined using standard methods. A panel of in vitro assays was completed on APs and CPPs. RESULTS: After frozen storage, CPPs retained 82% of AP yield and showed increased PLT associated P‐selectin and reduced responses to agonists. CPP 24‐hour recovery (41.6 ± 9.7%) was lower than for fresh PLTs (68.4 ± 8.2%; p < 0.0001) and did not meet the current FDA criterion. CPPs had diminished survival compared to fresh PLTs (7.0 ± 2.1 days vs. 8.4 ± 1.2 days, respectively; p = 0.018), but did meet and exceed the FDA criterion for survival. CONCLUSION: While 24‐hour recovery does not meet FDA criteria for liquid‐stored PLTs, the CPP survival of circulating PLTs was surprisingly high and exceeded the FDA criteria. These data support proceeding with additional studies to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of CPPs.     

In vitro evaluation of prestorage pooled leukoreduced whole blood-derived platelets stored for up to 7 days

BACKGROUND: Advantages to storing whole blood-derived platelets (PLTs) as a pool for 7 days would include operational efficiencies and facilitation of bacterial testing and pathogen inactivation. The in vitro quality of pre-storage pooled PLTs stored for up to 7 days was assessed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Leukoreduced PLTs were pooled before storage (5 units/pool) and stored for either 5 or 7 days. Samples were collected at the time of pooling and either on Day 5 (n=16-29) or on Day 7 (n=4-30) and tested for biochemical and activation markers and morphology and/or shape change. Control PLTs were stored individually for 5 or 7 days and then tested as indicated above. RESULTS: The mean PLT counts (x10(9)/L) were similar: control PLTs, 1344 (464 SD); and prestorage pooled PLTs, 1327 (220 SD; p=0.93). On Day 5, the pH value was significantly lower (p相似文献   

In vitro properties of platelets stored in three different additive solutions

BACKGROUND: New platelet (PLT) additive solutions (PASs) contain compounds that might improve the storage conditions for PLTs. This study compares the in vitro function, including hemostatic properties (clot formation and elasticity), of PLTs in T‐Sol, Composol, or SSP+ during storage for 5 days. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifteen buffy coats were pooled and divided into three parts. PLT concentrates (PCs) with 30% plasma and 70% PAS (T‐Sol, Composol, or SSP+) were prepared (n = 10). Swirling, PLT count, blood gases, metabolic variables, PLT activation markers, and coagulation by free oscillation rheometry (FOR) were analyzed on Days 1 and 5. RESULTS: Swirling was well preserved and pH acceptable (6.4‐7.4) during storage for all PASs. Storage of PLTs in T‐Sol led to a decrease in PLT count whereas the number of PLTs was unchanged in Composol or SSP+ PCs. PLTs in T‐Sol showed higher glucose metabolism than PLTs in Composol or in SSP+. At the end of storage PLTs in T‐Sol had higher spontaneous activation and lower ability to respond to an agonist than PLTs in Composol or SSP+. PLTs in all the PASs had a similar ability to promote clot formation and clot elasticity. CONCLUSION: Storage of PLTs in Composol or in SSP+ improved the quality of PCs in terms of better maintained PLT count, lower glucose metabolism, lower spontaneous activation, and improved response to a PLT agonist compared to PLTs in T‐Sol. PLTs stored in the various PASs had similar hemostatic properties. These findings make Composol and SSP+ interesting alternatives as PASs.     

Paired in vitro and in vivo comparison of apheresis platelet concentrates stored in platelet additive solution for 1 versus 7 days

BACKGROUND: To improve clinical access to platelet concentrates (PCs), prolonging the storage period is one alternative, provided that they are free from bacteria. The quality of platelets (PLTs) stored for 1 versus 7 days was compared by in vitro analyses and in vivo recovery and survival in blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Apheresis PCs from 10 donors were divided and stored in PLT additive solution in 2 equal units for a paired comparison. PLTs in one unit were (111)In-labeled at 1 day of storage, and PLTs in the other unit were labeled after 7 days of storage. PLTs were injected into the donor after labeling and samples were drawn after 30, 60, and 150 minutes and thereafter once a day for 14 days for recovery and survival measurements. RESULTS: PLT recovery on Day 7 was 80 percent of the recovery on Day 1 (p<0.05), and the survival on Day 7 was 65 percent of survival on Day 1 (p<0.005). No significant differences were seen regarding mean PLT volume (MPV), pH, pCO2, pO2, bicarbonate, or hypotonic shock response. Lactate increased and lactic dehydrogenase increased slightly, whereas glucose and ATP decreased, but not to a critical level. A significant increase in RANTES (110.7+/-76.6 vs. 277.6+/-50.8 pg/10(6) PLTs [p<0.005]) and PLT factor 4 (19.9+/-9.6 vs. 59.8+/-7.5 IU/10(6) PLTs [p<0.0001]) was noticed during storage. CONCLUSION: Recovery and survival of PCs stored for 7 days decreased, but met suggested criteria. Analyzed in vitro parameters showed acceptable results. Randomized patient transfusion studies will provide additional verification of the suitability of 7-day storage of PLTs.     

Efficacy of apheresis platelets treated with riboflavin and ultraviolet light for pathogen reduction

BACKGROUND: Pathogen reduction technologies for platelet (PLT) components offer a means to address continued viral transmission risks and imperfect bacterial detection systems. The efficacy of apheresis PLTs treated with riboflavin (vitamin B2) plus ultraviolet (UV) light (Mirasol, Navigant Biotechnologies) was investigated in a single-blind, crossover study in comparison to untreated PLTs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Normal subjects (n = 24) donated PLTs by apheresis on two occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Units were randomized to control or test arms, the latter receiving the addition of 28 mL of 500 micromol per L B2 and exposure to 6.2 J per mL UV light. PLTs were stored for 5 days with biochemical and hematologic analyses performed before and after illumination on Day 0 and at the end of storage. An aliquot of each unit was radiolabeled and returned to determine recovery and survival. RESULTS: The PLT content of treated units was maintained from Day 0 (4.1 x 10(11) +/- 0.4 x 10(11)) to Day 5 (4.0 x 10(11) +/- 0.4 x 10(11)). Treatment with B2 plus UV light was associated with an increase in lactate production with concomitant increases in glucose consumption. pH (control, 7.38 +/- 0.07; test, 7.02 +/- 0.10) was well maintained throughout storage. Recovery of treated PLTs (50.0 +/- 18.9%) was reduced from that of control PLTs (66.5 +/- 13.4%); survival was similarly shortened (104 +/- 26 hr vs. 142 +/- 26 h; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PLTs treated with B2 plus UV light demonstrate some alterations in in vitro measures but retain in vitro and in vivo capabilities similar to pathogen-reduced and licensed PLT components that have been shown to have useful clinical applicability. The recovery, survival, and metabolic properties of Mirasol PLTs should provide sufficient hemostatic support in thrombocytopenia to justify patient clinical trials.     

Viability and function of 8-day-stored apheresis platelets

BACKGROUND: Methods of bacterial detection and pathogen inactivation of platelets (PLTs) may allow extended storage of PLTs as long as PLT quality is maintained. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty normal volunteers had their PLTs collected with an apheresis machine (Haemonetics Corp.). A variety of in vitro PLT function and metabolic assays were performed both on Day 0 and after 8 days of storage. On Day 8, a small blood sample was drawn from each donor to obtain fresh PLTs. The fresh and stored autologous PLTs were labeled with either (51)Cr or (111)In, and the radiolabeled PLTs were transfused. Posttransfusion serial blood samples were drawn to determine the relative posttransfusion recoveries and survivals of the fresh versus the stored PLTs. RESULTS: Although the in vitro assays showed some differences between the two trial sites, the results were generally within the ranges expected for fresh and stored PLTs. Overall, PLT recoveries averaged 66 +/- 16 percent versus 53 +/- 20 percent and survivals averaged 8.5 +/- 1.6 days versus 5.6 +/- 1.6 days, respectively, for fresh compared to 8-day-stored PLTs. There were no significant differences in the in vivo PLT data between the trial sites or based on the radiolabel used for the measurements. CONCLUSION: After 8 days of storage, the in vivo posttransfusion recovery and survival of autologous Haemonetics apheresis PLTs meet the proposed standards for poststorage PLT quality.     

In vitro quality of single-donor platelets treated with riboflavin and ultraviolet light and stored in platelet storage medium for up to 8 days

BACKGROUND: The Mirasol pathogen reduction technology system is known to increase the activation and metabolic rate of platelets (PLTs). Storage of Mirasol PLTs in PLT storage medium (PSM) has the potential to slow this accelerated PLT storage lesion. We investigated the quality of Mirasol‐treated PLTs stored in either 50% SSP+ or 50% Composol for 8 days. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Single‐donor double hyperconcentrates were divided between control and Mirasol‐treated arms and after treatment were suspended in approximately 50% (vol/vol) SSP+ (n = 8) or Composol (n = 7). In vitro markers of PLT activation and/or apoptosis were measured over an 8‐day storage period. RESULTS: Mirasol treatment resulted in increased spontaneous PLT activation and glycolysis and these effects were worsened when PLTs were treated below a certain volume (150 mL). At higher treatment volumes there were no significant differences between treated units stored in either Composol or SSP+. When low‐volume units were stored in Composol the median pH fell below 6.4 on Day 5 and bicarbonate was undetectable, whereas in SSP+ the median pH value was greater than 6.9 and bicarbonate remained at detectable levels, despite other markers of in vitro function being similar to those of Composol. CONCLUSION: Mirasol treatment of PLTs followed by storage in PSM results in increased PLT activation and metabolism to a level similar to that reported for PLTs treated and stored in plasma. Units treated at a low volume (<150 mL) showed poor in vitro quality.     

Recovery, survival, and function of transfused platelets and detection of platelet engraftment after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND: Recovery and survival of transfused platelets (PLTs) are usually assessed by radioisotope labeling methods for evaluation of transfusion efficacy and new progress in the processing of PLT concentrates. Alternative, nonradioactive methods are warranted. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicolor flow cytometry method was developed for simultaneous studies of recovery, survival, and function of transfused PLTs. Eight consecutive patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (TX) were transfused with apheresis PLTs of nonself human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I types, and HLA Class I discrepancy between donor and recipient was used to identify transfused PLTs. Hematologic status and HLA Class I surface expression were analyzed immediately before transfusion, 1 and 6 hours after transfusion, and daily during the subsequent week. PLT activation was assessed by surface expression of CD63, CD62P, or CD42a, before and after stimulation with thrombin receptor agonist peptide. RESULTS: PLT recovery was 43, 41, and 31% for fresh (5‐72 hr old) and 30, 27, and 17% for stored (73‐148 hr old) PLTs, after 1, 6, and 15 to 28 hours, respectively. Survival of fresh versus stored PLTs were 160 and 105 hours, respectively. Spontaneous PLT activation and residual activation potential were almost equal for fresh and stored PLTs. PLT engraftment was detected between Day 7 and Day 9, which was significantly earlier than first sign of neutrophil engraftment (Days 11‐19; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Flow cytometry is an attractive alternative to radiolabeling of PLTs for simultaneous studies of survival, recovery, and function of transfused PLTs and early detection of PLT engraftment after allogeneic stem cell TX.     

In vitro pH effects on in vivo recovery and survival of platelets: an analysis by the BEST Collaborative

BACKGROUND: The pH environment of stored platelet (PLT) products is recognized as an important factor and is generally used as a key surrogate measure of PLT viability. It is the only in vitro measurement that has been translated into industry standards and regulatory rules or specifications for storage of PLT products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of in vitro pH on the in vivo recovery and survival of autologous PLT products.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from individual autologous radiolabeled PLT kinetic studies were solicited from independent laboratories. PLTs stored for at least 5 days in 100 percent autologous plasma with a pH_22°C of at least 6.2 were analyzed. Data were fit to a mixed-effects regression model with fixed effects of pH_22°C, time of storage, and preparation method-storage bag combination.
RESULTS: Eight research laboratories reported 476 individual recovery and survival results with associated pH before labeling from a variety of autologous, radiolabeled PLT kinetic studies from September 1999 to March 2005. These results are from 254 individual subjects who donated a total of 386 PLT units, with up to nine collections per subject reported. The effect of pH on either PLT recovery (p = 0.86) or survival (p = 0.55) was not significant. Time of storage and the method-bag combination both had significant effects on these outcomes (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that there is no relationship between in vitro pH at a pH_22°C of at least 6.2 and in vivo PLT viability as measured by radiolabeled recovery and survival of autologous PLTs.     

Extended storage of platelet‐rich plasma–prepared platelet concentrates in plasma or Plasmalyte

BACKGROUND: Using bacterial detection or pathogen reduction, extended platelet (PLT) storage may be licensed if PLT viability is maintained. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s poststorage PLT acceptance guidelines are that autologous stored PLT recoveries and survivals should be 66 and 58% or greater, respectively, of each donor's fresh PLT data. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Nonleukoreduced PLT concentrates were prepared from whole blood donations. Autologous PLT concentrates from 62 subjects were stored in 100% plasma (n = 44) or 20% plasma/80% Plasmalyte (n = 18), an acetate‐based, non–glucose‐containing crystalloid solution previously used for PLT storage. Fresh PLTs were obtained on the day the donor's stored PLTs were to be transfused. The fresh and stored PLTs were alternately radiolabeled with either ⁵¹chromium or ¹¹¹indium, and in vitro measurements were performed on the stored PLTs. RESULTS: The FDA's PLT recovery criteria were met for 7 days of plasma storage, but PLT survivals maintained viability for only 6 days. Plasmalyte‐stored PLTs did not meet either acceptance criteria after 6 days of storage. After 7 days of storage, PLT recoveries averaged 43 ± 4 and 30 ± 4% and survivals 4.1 ± 0.4 and 2.0 ± 0.2 days for plasma‐ and Plasmalyte‐stored PLTs, respectively (p = 0.03 for recoveries and p < 0.001 for survivals). Poststorage PLT recoveries correlated with the commonly used in vitro PLT quality measurements of hypotonic shock response and annexin V binding, while survivals correlated with extent of shape change, morphology score, and pH. CONCLUSION: There is a progressive decrease in recoveries and survivals of plasma‐stored PLTs over time. PLT viability is better maintained in plasma than Plasmalyte.     

Evaluation of in vitro storage properties of prestorage pooled whole blood–derived platelets suspended in 100 percent plasma and treated with amotosalen and long-wavelength ultraviolet light

BACKGROUND: Amotosalen, a psoralen, has been utilized for photochemical treatment (PCT) of apheresis platelets (PLTs) and pooled buffy coat PLTs suspended in additive solution. In the United States, the source of many PLT transfusions is from whole blood–derived PLTs prepared by the PLT‐rich plasma (PRP) method. This study investigated the in vitro PLT properties of amotosalen‐PCT of leukoreduced pools of PLTs prepared by the PRP method and suspended in 100 percent plasma. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: On Day 1 of storage, 12 leukoreduced (n = 6) or 10 leukoreplete (n = 6) ABO‐identical PLT concentrates were pooled, separated into two pools of 6 or 5 units, respectively, and leukoreduced (leukoreplete pools only). Each pool of 5 or 6 units was then photochemically treated (designated “test”: amotosalen plus 3.0 J/cm² long‐wavelength ultraviolet light followed by amotosalen/photoproduct removal) while the remaining identical pool (designated “control”) was untreated. PLT in vitro assays were performed on test and control pools during 7‐day storage. RESULTS: PCT resulted in slightly reduced pH in test pools compared to that of matched control pools after 5 days of storage (5‐unit pools: test, 6.96 ± 0.12 vs. control, 7.15 ± 0.09, p = 0.0033; 6‐unit pools: test, 6.90 ± 0.10 vs. control, 7.07 ± 0.09, p < 0.0001). Test pools adequately maintained many other in vitro properties including PLT morphology, hypotonic shock response, and extent of shape change parameters during 5‐day storage, which, like pH, also differed from those of controls. The pH of test and control pools declined on Day 7, with 1 of 6 test pools (either 5 or 6 units) having a pH value of less than 6.20, while all control pools had pH values of more than 6.66. CONCLUSION: PCT of leukoreduced PLT pools of whole blood–derived PLTs in 100 percent plasma maintained adequate PLT in vitro variables through 5 days of storage.     

In vitro and in vivo quality of leukoreduced apheresis platelets stored in a new platelet additive solution

BACKGROUND: Platelets (PLTs) stored in additive solutions (PASs) may reduce the risk of several plasma‐associated adverse transfusion reactions such as allergic reactions and potentially transfusion‐associated lung injury. The objective of this study was to determine the in vitro characteristics and the in vivo radiolabeled recovery and survival of apheresis PLTs (APs) stored in a new PAS and compare the latter to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Hyperconcentrated APs were collected from healthy subjects in a paired crossover study comparing PAS (35% plasma) and 100% plasma‐stored APs (Part 1) up to 7 days and, in Part 2, to determine the in vivo recovery and survival of PAS stored AP at 5 days compared to fresh PLT controls. In vitro and in vivo assays were performed following standard methods. RESULTS: Sixty‐six and 25 evaluable subjects successfully completed Parts 1 and 2, respectively. pH for PAS AP was maintained above 6.6 for 5 days of storage. P‐selectin values were consistent with published values for commonly transfused PLT products. The PAS in vivo PLT recovery (54.3 ± 8.1%) was 86.7% of the fresh control, and survival (6.4 ± 1.3 days) was 78.0% of the fresh control, both meeting the FDA performance criteria. CONCLUSION: APs stored in PAS with 35% plasma carryover maintained pH over 5 days of storage and met current FDA criteria for radiolabeled recovery and survival. The use of PAS for storage of single‐donor PLTs in clinical practice represents an acceptable transfusion product that reduces the volume of plasma associated with PLT transfusion.     

In vitro cell quality of buffy coat platelets in additive solution treated with pathogen reduction technology

BACKGROUND: Pathogen reduction technologies (PRTs) may induce storage lesion in platelet (PLT) concentrates. To investigate this, buffy coat PLTs (BCPs) in PLT additive solution (AS; SSP+) with or without Mirasol PRT (CaridianBCT Biotechnologies) were assessed by quality control tests and four‐color flow cytometry. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In vitro comparison of PRT and control pooled‐and‐split BCPs after 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8 days of storage was made. PLT concentration, count per unit, swirl, metabolism, activation (CD62P, PAC1, CD42b/GPIb, CD63, CD40L/CD154, CD40, annexin V), and microparticle, sCD40L, and sCD62P release were evaluated. RESULTS: PRT induced a minor initial PLT loss (Day 2 [mean ± SD], 302 × 10⁹ ± 44 × 10⁹ PLTs/unit vs. 325 × 10⁹ ± 46 × 10⁹ PLTs/unit; p < 0.001) but the decline was comparable to control BCP. Swirling was comparable and declined with similar rates in PRT‐treated and control BCPs during storage. PRT enhanced PLT metabolism and activation, evidenced by lower pH₂₂; increased glucose consumption and lactate production rates (p < 0.01); early increases in CD62P‐, PAC1‐, CD63‐, CD40L‐, CD40‐, and annexin V–positive PLTs; reduced GPIb expression; and enhanced release of PLT‐derived MPs and sCD40L (all p < 0.05). CD62P and PAC1 expression changed with different kinetics during storage and varying GPIb expression was displayed within the CD62P/PAC1‐positive PLT subsets. CONCLUSION: PRT treatment of BCP in AS induced a minor initial PLT loss and enhanced metabolism and PLT activation. The clinical relevance for PLT function in vivo of these findings will be investigated in a clinical trial.     

Platelet capacity of various platelet pooling systems for buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates

BACKGROUND: Platelet (PLT) storage lesions might depend on the total PLT count in the storage container and also on the PLT pooling system, especially the storage container, that is used for preparation of PLT concentrates (PCs). In this study, the PLT capacity of four commercially available PLT pooling systems was studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four PCs were prepared in pooling systems of Baxter, Fresenius, Terumo, or Pall. The PCs were pooled and divided with various total PLT counts over the four storage containers (<225 × 10⁹, 225 × 10⁹‐324 × 10⁹, 325 × 10⁹‐424 × 10⁹, and >424 × 10⁹ PLTs). Volumes were kept equal by adding plasma to PCs with less than 425 × 10⁹ PLTs until a same volume as for PCs with more than 424 × 10⁹ PLTs was reached. PCs were stored at room temperature and tested for various in vitro variables on Days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9. Paired experiments were repeated for each system five times. RESULTS: In vitro variables remained good for 9 days, that is, swirling score of 2 or more, pH value of 6.8 or more, glucose level of 10 mmol per L or more, lactate level of less than 25 mmol per L, and CD62p expression of less than 50 percent, for PCs in Baxter systems with more than 225 × 10⁹ PLTs, for PCs in Fresenius and Terumo systems with 225 × 10⁹ to 424 × 10⁹ PLTs, and for PCs in Pall systems with fewer than 425 × 10⁹ PLTs. CONCLUSION: PLT capacity depended on the PLT pooling systems used. All systems provide acceptable storage conditions. The Baxter system was the only system with capacity for more than 424 × 10⁹ PLTs per PC.     

Quantitation of coated platelet potential during collection, storage, and transfusion of apheresis platelets

BACKGROUND: Coated platelets (PLTs), a subpopulation of PLTs observed upon dual agonist stimulation with collagen and thrombin, are known to retain several procoagulant α‐granule proteins on their surface. By formation of a highly active membrane‐bound prothrombinase complex, these PLTs represent an important step in the coagulation cascade as a consequence of their ability to generate thrombin at the site of vascular injury. Various clinical observations suggest that higher levels of coated PLTs are associated with thrombosis while a deficiency of coated PLTs results in a bleeding diathesis. Current quality control guidelines for in vitro PLT storage measure PLT viability but no routine evaluation of the hemostatic function of stored PLTs and particularly no estimation of coated PLT potential is performed. Our primary objective was to evaluate if the process of apheresis and storage of PLT units alters the levels of coated PLTs. In addition, we sought to determine how transfusion of stored PLTs into patients with thrombocytopenia affects the patient's coated PLT levels. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Coated PLT levels were analyzed in 13 voluntary PLT donors before donation, in the fresh apheresis product (Trima, CaridianBCT) and in the stored apheresis product just before transfusion. In addition, 10 patients with thrombocytopenia were analyzed for coated PLTs before and after transfusion of a stored PLT product. RESULTS: Coated PLT levels were significantly decreased after the process of apheresis (17% relative decline; p < 0.01) and with prolonged storage (1 to 5 days; 53% relative decline; p < 0.001). Transfusion of stored PLT units did not result in significant increment of coated PLT levels in patients with thrombocytopenia as expected considering the low level of coated PLTs in stored PLT units. Furthermore, there was no suggestion of regeneration of coated PLT potential upon reinfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Isolation and storage of apheresis PLTs by standard blood bank procedures results in a significant decline in coated PLT potential. Reinfusion of stored apheresis PLTs into patients with thrombocytopenia resulted in a predictable change in coated PLT potential with no suggestion of regeneration of lost coated PLT potential.     

A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous radiolabeled in vivo platelet (PLT) recoveries and survivals of 7-day-stored PLT-rich plasma and buffy coat PLTs from the same subjects

BACKGROUND: A recent review concluded that there was inadequate evidence to show a difference between buffy coat (BC) and platelet (PLT)‐rich plasma (PRP) PLT concentrates prepared from whole blood. We hypothesized that 7‐day‐stored BC‐PLTs would have superior autologous recoveries and survivals compared to PRP‐PLTs and that both would meet the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria for poststorage viability. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, crossover study design in healthy subjects who provided informed consent. Each participant donated a unit of whole blood on two occasions. In random order, either BC‐PLTs or PC‐PLTs were prepared after a 20 ± 2°C overnight hold of the whole blood. PLTs were stored under standard conditions. On Day 7, fresh PLTs were prepared from 43 mL of autologous whole blood. The fresh PLTs paired with either BC‐PLTs or PRP‐PLTs were alternately labeled with ¹¹¹In or ⁵¹Cr and simultaneously reinfused to determine recoveries and survivals. In vitro assays were performed on Days 1 and 7. RESULTS: Fourteen subjects completed the study at two sites. No differences in poststorage PLT viabilities were observed between BC‐PLTs and PRP‐PLTs; recovery differences averaged 3.7 ± 2.4% (±SE, p = 0.15) and survival differences averaged 0.48 ± 0.56 days (p = 0.41). Neither type of PLTs met the current FDA criteria for either poststorage PLT recoveries or survivals. CONCLUSION: We were unable to demonstrate that single‐unit BC‐PLTs stored for 7 days have superior poststorage viability compared to PRP‐PLTs. Failure to meet the minimum FDA criteria for poststorage PLT viability raises questions regarding the acceptance thresholds of these metrics.