Palliativmedizinische Lehre

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the attitude of medical students with or without tuition in palliative medicine towards active euthanasia and whether this changes during the course of the study period. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed with 13 items (focus groups, preliminary tests) which takes knowledge and attitude into consideration. Students in the 2nd (2CS) and 6th (6CS) clinical semesters at 2 universities with (U1) and without (U2) palliative medicine as a compulsory subject were included. RESULTS: The initial approval rate for active euthanasia was high for students in 2CS at both universities (U1 and U2), remained stable for U2 and sank clearly for U1. At U1 the number of students who would consider active euthanasia for themselves was greatly reduced but only slightly for U2. Of all the students, 40.9% of U2 and 22.5% of U1 were of the opinion that they could practice active euthanasia on patients. The majority admitted to being frightened to have responsibility for incurable patients. Of the students in 6CS, only 12.2% from U1 and 7.1% from U2 considered themselves sufficiently prepared to be responsible for terminally ill patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this questionnaire demonstrated a clear influence of tuition in palliative medicine on the rejection attitude of students towards active euthanasia, however, the attitude proactive euthanasia was still high. The results indicate that tuition in palliative medicine must be modified and substantially intensified.     

French physicians' attitudes toward legalisation of euthanasia and the ambiguous relationship between euthanasia and palliative care

In 1999, the French Parliament established a "right to palliative care", which reactivated public debate about euthanasia. In order to investigate jointly physicians' attitude toward palliative care and euthanasia, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of a national sample of French GPs, oncologists, and neurologists. Overall, 917 physicians participated in the survey. Significant proportions of respondents, especially among GPs and neurologists, considered that palliative sedation and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments (WLST) were euthanasia. Multivariate analysis showed that the physicians who had special medical training in palliative care, and those who distinguish palliative sedation and WLST from euthanasia were more likely to oppose legalisation of euthanasia. Thus, French physicians' attitude to the legalisation of euthanasia is strongly influenced by whether or not they distinguish palliative care from euthanasia. Improved palliative care requires better training of the entire medical profession, and clearer guidelines about which end-of-life care practices are legally and ethically acceptable.     

Undergraduate training in palliative medicine in Germany: what effect does a curriculum without compulsory palliative care have on medical students' knowledge, skills and attitudes?

INTRODUCTION: The effect of a curriculum without compulsory courses in palliative medicine on students' knowledge, kills and attitudes towards the care of dying patients and decisions at the end of life was investigated. METHODS: In a cross sectional, questionnaire based survey at the medical school of Bonn 1st, 3rd and 5th year students had to grade their knowledge and skills in items concerning palliative medicine. Attitudes towards end of life decisions were queried. RESULTS: The return rate was 78%. Significant increase in self estimation of certainty comparing 1st to 5th year students were detected for the items distinction between palliative and curative medicine (p <0.001), symptom control (p <0.001), pain management (p =0.001) and communication (p =0.036). No significant differences were recorded for the items accompaniment of dying patients, breaking bad news and integration of spiritual aspects. The low overall certainty is reflected in poor knowledge. A significant decrease of the approval for euthanasia by request was evident (p =0.012). DISCUSSION: A medical curriculum without compulsory course does increase confidence in some of the core competencies in palliative care, but the overall results at the end of the training are poor. The WHO claims that palliative care has to be "compulsory in courses leading to a basic professional qualification" has still to be fulfilled in Germany. This study can serve as a baseline to evaluate the effect of mandatory courses in palliative care.     

Attitudes of oncologists, family doctors, medical students and lawyers to euthanasia

The purpose of this survey was to define attitudes and opinions of two types of physicians, medical students and lawyers in the area of euthanasia and related issues and problems. A questionnaire was used as the source of data. There were four groups of test persons: oncologists, home care physicians (family doctors), third-year medical students and lawyers. The questionnaire included 22 questions, 4 of which concerned general characteristics of tested persons (including religious belief), while 18 referred to the problems of euthanasia. The total number of tested persons was 123, 55 men and 68 women with a median age of 38 ±11 years (±SD). There were 30 test persons in the group of oncologists, 31 in the group of family doctors, 31 in the group of third-year students, and 31 in the group of lawyers. Between 97% and 100% of individuals gave scored responses to most items. More than half of the individuals (57%) were against euthanasia, and 61% are against the legalization of euthanasia. The views of doctors and medical students were similar (2/3 against) and significantly different from the view of lawyers (2/3 for, P<0.01). The legalization of euthanasia is favored by 61% of lawyers, in contrast to 43%, 30% and 23% of oncologists, family doctors and medical students, respectively. Overall, 31% sais they would apply euthanasia if they were asked for it, and 36% that would if it had been legalized. Lawyers are twice as willing to perform euthanasia as students or physicians. The least ready to apply euthanasia are physicians working as oncologists (only 1 in 5). Compared with oncologists, one-third of home-care physicians would perform euthanasia anyway, whether legalized or not. Most of the test persons were of the opinion that euthanasia should be performed in the case of children born with a severe anomaly. None of the tested groups considered invalidity or being a burden to the family important reasons for the termination of somebody's life. Approximately 40% of responders believed that the decision for euthanasia should be made by the patient alone. Only lawyers were of the opinion that the misuse of euthanasia could be controlled. Our study shows that it is probably more important to determine factors associated with behavior pertaining to euthanasia in physicians working closely with suffering patients. Reducing suffering and launching a hospice movement and palliative care services might be the most appropriate way to deal with the problem of euthanasia.     

Medical and nursing students' attitudes toward cardiopulmonary resuscitation and current practice guidelines

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Every member of a healthcare organisation should be able to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation (CPR-D). The purpose of this cohort study was to examine medical and nursing student's beliefs and attitudes toward CPR-D and current practice guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pilot questionnaire concerning beliefs and attitudes toward CPR-D was distributed to 120 fourth year medical students. After statistical analyses (Cronbach's alpha), the questionnaire was modified to increase its reliability. The second version was distributed via e-mail to 100 final sixth year medical students and to 120 final fourth year nursing students. The students had 2 weeks to answer the questionnaire. A reminder was sent via e-mail after 1 week. RESULTS: The questionnaire was answered by 71 of 120 fourth year students (59.1%), 56 of 100 (56.0%) sixth year medical students and 76 of 120 (63.3%) nursing students. Seventy percent of the fourth year, 85.8% of the final (sixth) year medical students and 70.0% of the final (fourth) year nursing students felt confident about their ability to perform basic life support (p<0.01) and 24.0% of the fourth year, 84.0% of the final year medical students and 22.7% of the nursing students about defibrillation (p<0.001). The perceived ability to defibrillate correlated significantly with a positive attitude toward nurse-performed defibrillation (p<0.01) and negatively with fear of damaging the patient's heart by defibrillation (p<0.01). Negative attitude toward defibrillation correlated with perceived organisational attitudes toward practise guidelines (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Medical students' attitudes mature as hoped for, but the nursing students need encouragement. More information is needed to diminish anxiety concerning defibrillation. Negative beliefs and attitudes toward defibrillation affect the students' attitudes toward practice guidelines.     

Perception of palliative care and euthanasia among recently graduated and experienced nurses

Palliative care and euthanasia have become the subject of ethical and political debate in Poland. However, the voice of nurses is rarely heard. The aim of this study is to explore the perception of palliative care and euthanasia among recent university bachelor degree graduates and experienced nurses in Poland. Specific objectives include: self-assessment of the understanding of these terms, recognition of clinical cases, potential acceptability of euthanasia, and an evaluation of attitudes towards palliative care and euthanasia. This is an exploratory study. A convenience sample of 206 recent graduates and 252 experienced nurse practitioners were interviewed. A structured questionnaire was used for collecting and interpreting data. Subjective perception of the terms ;palliative care' and ;euthanasia' was high and consistent with the recognition of clinical cases. The majority of the nurses excluded euthanasia from palliative care. They recognized personal philosophy of life as the most influential factor affecting attitudes towards euthanasia. The importance of the law was valued more highly by the experienced nurses.     

A comparison of attitudes of medical students in England and in South Africa towards patients with life-limiting illness

All medical schools in the U.K. now include teaching in palliative care in the undergraduate curriculum, and this is mirrored in Europe and the U.S.A. In South Africa, however, palliative care education and provision are not widely available. An increasing number of medical and nursing staff are invited to teach palliative care in other countries. Such teaching should, however, take into account the cultural attitudes the students have towards the care of patients with a chronic or terminal illness. Nineteen statements on attitudes were constructed, and medical students in Leicester, U.K., and in Medunsa, South Africa, were invited to respond to them using a 10-point Likert scale. The questionnaire was distributed before either cohort of students had received any teaching in this area. Students in South Africa were significantly more likely to want to work in a speciality where most patients were likely to be cured (p < 0.001) and significantly less likely to believe that caring for dying patients could be rewarding (p < 0.001). South African medical students had significantly fewer positive attitudes than had their U.K. counterparts toward patients being informed of a terminal prognosis (p < 0.001). This study indicates that cultural differences between medical students may have an effect on the teaching of care for patients with life-limiting illness. This has relevance for curriculum delivery, especially when professionals are invited to teach or develop material on palliative care for other countries.     

Similarity and difference among standard medical care,palliative sedation therapy,and euthanasia: a multidimensional scaling analysis on physicians' and the general population's opinions

There is a strong controversy about the differences among standard medical care, palliative sedation therapy, and euthanasia in recent medical literature. To investigate the similarities and differences among these medical treatments, a secondary analysis of two previous surveys was performed. In those surveys, Japanese physicians and the general population were asked to identify their treatment recommendations or preferences for intolerable and refractory distress in the terminal stage. The options were standard medical care without intentional sedation, mild sedation, intermittent deep sedation, continuous deep sedation, and physician-assisted suicide (PAS)/euthanasia. Multidimensional scaling analysis mapped their responses. The physician responses were clustered into 3 groups: 1) standard medical care, 2) palliative sedation therapy including mild, intermittent deep, continuous deep sedation, and 3) PAS/euthanasia. The general population's responses were classified into 3 subgroups: 1) standard medical care, 2) mild and intermittent deep sedation, and 3) a group including continuous deep sedation and PAS/euthanasia. Physicians placed continuous deep sedation closer to mild and intermittent sedation, while the general population mapped it closer to PAS/euthanasia. In conclusion, physicians and general population can generally differentiate the three approaches--standard medical care, palliative sedation therapy, and PAS/euthanasia. We recommend that mild and intermittent deep sedation should be differentiated from standard medical care, and that continuous deep sedation should be dealt with separately from other types of sedation. Clear definitions of palliative sedation therapy will contribute to quality discussion.     

Knowledge about and attitudes towards medical cannabis among Austrian university students

BackgroundThe relevance of medical cannabis (MC) increases; and, educating those who are at the forefront of patient care is imperative. Yet, research on medical students’ expertise and opinions is still scarce.ObjectiveThis study set out to evaluate Austrian medical students’ knowledge about and attitudes towards MC and compare them with other academic disciplines. Additionally, gender was controlled for.MethodsAn online survey was conducted with N = 404 students enrolled in (1) medical studies, (2) studies with a medical background and (3) studies without a medical background.ResultsIn contrast to non-medical students, 64 % of medical students said they learnt about MC at the university. Although students were confident about their knowledge, they struggled to differentiate between CBD and THC. Chronic pain, oncological diseases and palliative care were the most frequently cited indications, psychiatric indications, however, were mentioned less often. Medical students were more reserved in their attitudes towards increasing medical usage and legalizing cannabis than the two other groups. Also, they were more skeptical about whether physicians should be allowed to prescribe MC and whether they should be obliged to offer it. Males showed more confidence regarding cannabis knowledge and were more favorable of legalizing and prescribing cannabis; females perceived cannabis as more physically addictive and as a gate-way drug.ConclusionsConsidering that beliefs and attitudes shape behavior, it is expected that future health care professionals will struggle with recommending cannabis for medical treatment. A coordinated approach for medical training is needed to ensure high standard medical care.     

Teaching palliative care to critical care medicine trainees

OBJECTIVES: Palliative care is an important component of critical care medicine. Few fellowship programs have developed a curriculum designed to teach palliative care precepts to trainees. We describe our 2-yr experience in teaching palliative care to multidisciplinary critical care medicine fellows. DESIGN: Two-consecutive-year palliative care training for unselected critical care medicine fellows at a large, urban, university, tertiary care medical center. INTERVENTIONS: We 1) identified palliative care skills and knowledge that first-year critical care fellows should acquire; 2) developed a curriculum to teach those skills and knowledge, including required readings, small group lectures and skills sessions that included role-playing to modify skills and attitudes, and (in year 2) experiential learning on a hospital-based palliative care rotation; and 3) attempted to evaluate the curriculum with attitude and knowledge assessments. RESULTS: A total of 35 fellows participated in the palliative care training during the 2 yrs reported. Seven fellows participated in a clinical rotation in palliative care. Fellows evaluated usefulness of the small group sessions between 4.4 and 4.9 on a 5-point Likert scale. Four of seven fellows rated the clinical rotation quality at 3/5. Pretest and posttest knowledge mean scores were 58% and 69%, respectively. Problems included providing time for fellows to participate in the clinical rotation and negative attitudes regarding the relevance of palliative care to their future in critical care. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care training for critical care fellows is feasible. Fellows value skills training more than a clinical rotation in palliative care. Baseline knowledge of palliative care is low.