Diagnosis of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Implanted Pacemakers: Relationship to Symptoms and Other Variables

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is not always accompanied by clear-cut symptoms and symptoms suggestive of AF may not correspond to a genuine AF episode. The study prospectively evaluated the burden of asymptomatic AF episodes in pacemaker patients (for sick sinus syndrome) with a history of documented paroxysmal AF.
Methods: Consecutive patients were enrolled and implanted with dual-chamber pacemakers equipped with diagnostic features for AF monitoring. Each patient was instructed about typical AF symptoms and was asked to keep a detailed log of symptoms. Stored pacemaker data were analyzed using only AF episodes >30 s.
Results: The mean follow-up was 16 ± 6 months and 102 patients were enrolled (73 ± 7 years, 59 M). Thirteen patients (13%) dropped out with the development of permanent AF and their data were discarded. Twenty-three patients (26%) without device-stored AF episodes all reported at least one annotated AF episode. There were 1,245 device-stored AF episodes in 66 (74%) out of 89 patients. Patients reported 1,141 episodes of AF-related symptoms. Only 240 (21%) corresponded to a genuine device-stored AF event. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of symptoms to detect AF were respectively 19% and 21%. Episode duration, rate increase at the onset of the arrhythmia, heart disease, or antiarrhythmic drug therapy showed no statistically significant differences comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes.
Conclusions: Many pacemaker patients with paroxysmal AF can develop AF-like symptoms in the absence of device-stored AF. AF-related symptoms have low sensitivity and low positive predictive value in patients with permanent pacemakers.     

Initial Clinical Experience with an Implantable Human Atrial Defibrillator

Low energy biatrial shock is an effective means of restoring sinus rhythm in patients with atril fibrillation (AF). Ventricular proarrhythmia is avoided provided that shocks are well synchronized to R waves that are not at closely coupled intervals or preceded by long-short cycles. Based on these principles, an implantable atrial defibrillator has been developed and was implanted in three patients with drug refractory paroxysmal AF. The device detects AF via an actively fixed right atrial and a self-retaining coronary sinus defibrillating leads, and delivers 3/3 ms biphasic shocks up to 300 V synchronized to the R wave. The mean implant threshold (ED50) was 195V (1.8 J), and minimum voltage at conversion during follow-up assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months were 260 V, 2.5 J, 250 V, 2.3 J, and 300 V, 3.0 J respectively. Detection of AF was 100% specific and shocks were 100% synchronized, although only a proportion of synchronized R waves were considered suitable for shock delivery primarily because of closely coupled cycles. Three patients had 9 spontaneous AF episodes. 8/9 (89%) successfully defibrillated by shocks of 260–300 V. Sedation was not used in 4 out of 9 (45%) episodes. Backup ventricular pacing was initiated by the device in 6 out of(67%) episodes. One patient had more frequent AF after lead placement, which subsided after a change of medication. There was no ventricular proarrhythmia. It is concluded that an implantable atrial defibrillator is a viable therapy for selected patients with paroxysmal AF. The device is capable of accurate AF detection, R wave synchronization and ventricular support pacing after successful defibrillation of AF.     

Temporary Atrial Pacing in the Prevention of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Since its prevention with prophylactic drug therapy has limited success, alternative approaches are desirable. This study examined the efficacy of atrial or biatrial pacing, compared with no pacing, on the incidence of AF after isolated CABG.
Methods: From August 2002 to September 2004, 240 patients underwent CABG. After surgery, right and left atrial epicardial pacing wires were implanted for 72 hours of temporary pacing. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: no pacing (control group), right atrial (RA), and biatrial (BiA) pacing. Cardiac rhythm was monitored continuously during intensive care, or daily on the ward. The primary endpoints of this study were an episode of AF occurring up to 72 hours after CABG and the risk factors correlated with this event.
Results: Atrial and BiA pacing significantly lowered the incidence (1.25% vs 25%, P = 0.001) of AF episodes, and were both correlated (odd ratio 0.038; 95% confidence interval 0.005–0.29) with a decrease in rates of postoperative AF. Multivariable analysis identified older age (odd ratio 1.074; 95% confidence interval 1.024–1.12) and no pacing as independent risk factors of postoperative AF.
Conclusions: Temporary right atrial or biatrial pacing after CABG significantly decreased the postoperative incidence of AF. Multivariable analysis identified older age and no pacing as predictors of AF occurrence .     

Ventricular Proarrhythmic Effects of Atrial Fibrillation are Modulated by Depolarization and Repolarization Anomalies in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) may have a ventricular proarrhythmic effect, particularly in the setting of heart failure. We assessed whether AF predicts appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and explored modulators of risk.
Methods and Results: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 215 consecutive patients with ICDs for primary prevention having a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%. Mean age at ICD implantation was 61.0 ± 9.7 years and 17% were women. Overall, 22 patients (10.2%) experienced appropriate ICD shocks over a follow-up of 1.3 ± 0.7 years, corresponding to an actuarial event-rate of 5.8% per year. In univariate analysis, AF was associated with a 3.6-fold increased risk of appropriate shocks (P = 0.0037). Annual rates of appropriate ICD shocks in patients with and without AF were 12.9% and 3.5%, respectively (P = 0.0200). In multivariate stepwise Cox regression analyses controlling for baseline imbalances, demographic parameters, underlying heart disease, and therapy, history of AF independently predicted appropriate shocks (hazard ratio 2.7, P = 0.0278). Prolonged QRS duration (>130 ms) and QTc (>440 ms) modulated the effect of AF on appropriate shocks. Patients with both AF and QRS > 130 ms were more than five times more likely to receive an appropriate ICD shock (hazard ratio 5.4, P = 0.0396). Patients with AF and QTc > 440 ms experienced a greater than 12-fold increased risk of appropriate shocks (hazard ratio 12.7, P = 0.0177).
Conclusion: In prophylactic ICD recipients with left ventricular dysfunction, AF is associated with increased risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias, particularly when combined with conduction and/or repolarization abnormalities.     

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Objectives: The use of antiarrhythmic drugs after ablation is a controversial issue when evaluating the efficacy of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. This study compares in a prospective and randomized fashion the impact of an antiarrhythmic drug in preventing AF recurrence after AF ablation.
Methods: From February 2004 to May 2005, 107 consecutive patients (mean age 57 ± 10 years, 69 men), with paroxysmal (60%) or persistent (40%) drug refractory AF, were randomly assigned to ablation alone (Group A, 53 patients) or combined with the best antiarrhythmic therapy, preferably amiodarone (Group B, 54 patients). All patients underwent cavo-tricuspid and left inferior pulmonary vein (PV)-mitral isthmus ablation plus circumferential PV ablation, using a guided electro-anatomical approach. Standard electrocardiograms (ECG), and ambulatory and transtelephonic ECG monitoring were used to assess AF recurrences. Recurrences during the first month after ablation were excluded from this analysis.
Results: At 12 months of follow-up, no significant difference was observed in the rates of AF recurrences between Group A (18/53 patients, 34%) and Group B (16/54 patients, 30%). The percentage of patients with ≥1 asymptomatic AF episode was higher in Group B than in Group A (10/16 patients, 63%, vs 5/18 patients, 28%, P = 0.04).
Conclusions: Continuing antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients who undergo catheter ablation for AF did not lower the rate of AF recurrences. Antiarrhythmic drugs increased the proportion of patients with asymptomatic AF episodes.     

Usefulness of atrial pacing for prevention and termination of atrial tachyarrhythmias in a patient with persistent atrial fibrillation

Atrial pacing with dedicated algorithms for prevention and termination of atrial tachyarrhythmias is under clinical evaluation. A patient is described with persistent symptomatic AF. After cardioversion and implantation of a DDDRP pacemaker before planned AVN ablation, the patient was free of symptoms. Early after implant, one cardioversion of AF was necessary. Over the course of 12 months, only five episodes of atrial tachyarrhythmia occurred, all automatically pace terminated within 24 hours. Thus, selected patients with persistent AF may benefit from preventive atrial pacing since the tachyarrhythmia can organize intermittently to a degree sufficient for pace termination.     

Evaluation of a Dual Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator for the Treatment of Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias

BORIANI, G., et al .: Evaluation of a Dual Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator for the Treatment of Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias. Eighty-nine patients with a documented history of atrial tachyarrhythmias or fibrillation (AF) received a cardioverter defibrillator designed to selectively differentiate and treat atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Twenty-two patients received a coronary sinus lead and, therefore, could use a separate shock vector for selective treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias/AF. The device is designed to treat tachyarrhythmias with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and/or shock therapy using an atrial and/or a ventricular shock vector. Patients underwent induction and shock termination of atrial or dual tachyarrhythmias (AF/VF) to verify proper device function and to measure the arrhythmia detection time with enhancements and preventive algorithms programmed On and Off, respectively. Detection time for 329 VF inductions was   2.41 ± 0.64  seconds   with enhancements On and   2.29 ± 0.47   with enhancements Off (NS). At implant or predischarge, 283 AF and/or AF/VF (121 atrial and 162 atrial/ventricular fibrillation) were induced. Shock conversion efficacy was 89.8% with AF conversion energies ranging from 0.9 to 27 J. Thirteen of the 23 patients had atrial shock conversions using the separate shock vector with an average conversion energy of   1.9 ± 1.4  J   . (range 0.5–5 J). During follow-up the efficacy of ATP on atrial tachyarrhythmias was 59% and the efficacy of delivered shocks on AF was 85%. This new dual chamber cardioverter defibrillator appropriately detected and classified atrial arrhythmias, and shock therapy for AF was highly effective. The detection algorithm differentiated atrial tachyarrhythmia/AF and did not delay VF detection. The separate shock vector converted induced AF with energies ranging from 0.6 to 5 J. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. II]:461–465)     

Effect of coexisting cardiovascular disease on the long-term efficacy and safety of the implantable atrial defibrillator

The long-term efficacy and safety of implantable atrial defibrillator (IAD) therapy in patients with AF and cardiovascular disease is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IAD therapy in patients with and without coexisting cardiovascular disease. In 115 patients implanted with an IAD, 85 patients had cardiovascular disease: 41 (48%) patients had 1 cardiovascular abnormality, 29 (35%) patients had 2, 13 (15%) patients had 3, and 2 (2%) patients had 4 different cardiovascular abnormalities. The device was programmed into a rhythm monitoring mode for the first 3-month postimplant period. All defibrillation therapy was performed under physician supervision to monitor safety and efficacy. After this initial monitoring period, patients were allowed to activate their device away from the hospital or clinic. A total of 357 spontaneous AF episodes occurred in 83 (72%) patients during observed operation and the mean shock efficacy was 93.5+/-20.3% (lower 95% confidence interval [CI] 89.8%). As of the lastfollow-up, 58 (55%) patients had transition to receive nonphysician observed therapy. Forty-two (72%) patients had experienced 332 episodes of AF for which theyhad received device therapy away from the hospital/clinic (mean shock efficacy 90.5+/-39.7%). The presence of hypertension, valvular heart disease, and ischemic heart disease did not affect the shock efficacy of the IAD during physician observed and nonobserved therapy (P > 0.05). However, the presence of congestive heart failure was associated with a lower clinical efficacy during observed and nonobserved therapy (P < 0.05). Overall, 5,262 shocks have been delivered with the IAD without any episode of proarrhythmia. The observed proarrhythmic risk was 0%, with an estimated maximum proarrhythmic risk of 0.06% per shock (95% upper CI). A stand-alone IAD appears to be safe in the presence of cardiovascular disease. The lower clinical efficacy for AF associated with congestive heart failure might be related to a higher rate of early reinitiation of AF after defibrillation.     

Long-Term Outcomes of CRT-PM Versus CRT-D Recipients

Objective: To compare the rates of all-cause mortality in recipients of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices without (CRT-PM) versus with defibrillator (CRT-D).
Methods: Between February 1999 and July 2004, 233 patients (mean age = 69 ± 8 years, 180 men) underwent implantation of CRT-PM or CRT-D devices. New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure functional class II was present in 11%, class III in 69%, and class IV in 20% of patients; mean left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was 26.5 ± 6.5 %, 48% presented with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and 49% with ischemic heart disease. Cox multiple variable regression analysis was performed in search of predictors of death.
Results: The clinical characteristics of the 117 CRT-PM and 116 CRT-D recipients were similar, except for LVEF (28.2 ± 6.2% vs 25.0 ± 6.5%, respectively; P < 0.001), and ischemic versus nonischemic etiology of heart failure (41% vs 56%, respectively P = 0.02). Over a mean follow-up of 58 ± 15 months, no significance difference in overall mortality rate was observed between the two study groups. Male sex, NYHA functional class IV, and atrial fibrillation at implant were significant predictors of death.
Conclusions: There was no difference in long-term survival rate among patients with CRT-D versus CRT-PM, although CRT-D more effectively lowered the sudden death rate. Male sex, NYHA functional class IV, and atrial fibrillation predicted the worst prognosis.     

Incidence and Predictive Factors of Atrial Fibrillation in Paced Patients

We have designed a prospective observational study to analyze the incidence and predictive factors of atrial fibrillation (AF) during a long follow-up, in a large population. Atrial fibrillation episodes were documented by the fallback mode switch (FMS) provided by implanted pacemakers. We have included 377 patients (61% men). The pacing indications were atrioventricular (AV) block (49%), sinus node disease (SND, 16%), bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome (BTS, 5%), AV block + SND (19%), AV block + BTS (6%), and BTS + SND (5%). The mean age at implant was 75 ± 12 (range 28–95). Atrial fibrillation before inclusion was documented in 10% of patients. Drug therapy at first follow-up included beta-adrenergic blockers (17% of the patients), amiodarone (13%), and others (16%). The mean follow-up was 30 ± 24 weeks. At least one AF episode was stored during follow-up in the memory of 169 pacemakers (45%). Among patients without history of AF at implant, 46% had documented FMS during follow-up. Patients with AF received more antiplatelet medications than patients without AF (P = 0.03). In patients with AF, New York Heart Association functional class was slightly higher, amiodarone and sotalol were more often prescribed, and the proportion of hypertension was higher than in patients without AF. However, these trends were not statistically significant. A significant higher incidence of premature atrial beats was observed in patients with AF than patients without AF (P < 0.0002). Patients with AF had a lower atrial percentage of paced events (55%) than patients without AF (63%, P < 0.02). These preliminary results confirm the high incidence of AF in paced patients and suggest a preventive effect of atrial pacing. The effects of other clinical variables may be confirmed with a longer follow-up in a larger population.     

Detection of Atrial Fibrillation by Implanted Devices with Wireless Data Transmission Capability

Remote telemetry may facilitate the management of implantable devices. We tested the reliability of a new automatic, wireless home monitoring (HM) system that archives data every 24 hours. We retrospectively analyzed archival data from 276 consecutive pacing system implants to define temporal atrial fibrillation (AF) patterns and associated ventricular rate. An "AF day" was defined by a >20%/24 hour mode switch (MS) duration, irrespective of the MS number. Management decisions resulting from transmissions were noted. A pilot study confirmed that 89% of 22,356 transmissions were successful, of which >90% were received in <5 minutes. Data integrity was 100% preserved. Overall, AF developed in 29 patients (10.5%), representing a total of 645 AF days (mean = 22.2 ± 29.6 AF, median = 9 days), over 12 ± 2 months of monitoring. AF was infrequent (50% of 24 hours. Ventricular rates during 645 AF days in 29 patients averaged 95.1 ± 9.9 beats/min (median = 94 beats/min). Ventricular rates were >80 beats/min in 25 ± 30 AF days (median = 11 days). HM enabled rapid anticoagulation decisions. In recipients of implantable devices, automatic wireless telemetry with HM was efficient and reliable. Its application may overcome some current challenges in AF management by early notification and precise measurement of both AF burden and ventricular rate during AF.     

Spontaneous Reinitiation of Atrial Fibrillation Following Transvenous Atrial Defibrillation

Spontaneous reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been systematically looked at in patients undergoing transvenous AF. This study involved 11 patients, the mean age 60 ± 8 years. 3 male and 8 female, in whom transvenous atrial defibrillation successfully converted AF to sinus rhythm. Eight patients had paroxysmal AF and three patients had chronic persistent AF for 4 weeks or more. Four patients were taking antiarrhythmic medications at the time of testing. Multipolar transvenous catheters were positioned inside the coronary sinus, right atrium, and the right ventricle. Atrial defibrillation testing was performed using the METRIX atrial defibrillation system in nine patients and the Ventritex HVSO2 in the remaining two patients. A total of 64 therapeutic shocks (range 3–11) were delivered in the 11 patients, and 31 of these successfully converted AF to sinus rhythm. In four patients spontaneous AF was reinitiated following 12 successful transvenous atrial defibrillation episodes. The mean time to reinitiation of AF following shock delivery and restoration of sinus rhythm was 8.26 ± 5.25 seconds, range 1.8–19.9 seconds. All 12 episodes of spontaneous AF were preceded by a spontaneous premature atrial complex. The coupling interval of the premature atrial complexes was 443 ± 43 ms, range 390–510 ms. None of the patients taking antiarrhythmic medications or those demonstrating no premature atrial complexes had spontaneous reinitiation of AF. In conclusion, spontaneous reinitiation of AF can occur in a significant proportion of patients with AE undergoing transvenous atrial defibrillation. This phenomenon is preceded by the occurrence of atrial premature complex. Findings of this study may have significant clinical implications.(PACE 1998; 21:1105–1110)     

Clinical Predictors and Natural History of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with DDD Pacemakers

GROSS, J., ET AL.: Clinical Predictors and Natural History of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with DDD Pacemakers. Effective DDD pacing requires that patients remain free of atrial fibrillation (AF). Four hundred eighty-nine consecutive patients undergoing initial transvenous DDD implants were reviewed to determine the incidence of postimplant AF in this population and to assess what factors, known at implant, predicted the later development of AF. The variables analyzed included age, sex, indication for implant (dominant SA or AV node disease), history of AF, atrial electrogram characteristics and pacing threshold, and the status of retrograde conduction. Forty-eight patients (9.8%) developed AF a mean of 23 months postimplant, and 11 of these patients returned to sinus rhythm and were managed once again in DDD for significant periods. A prior history of AF and the presence of dominant sinoatrial disease were far more prevalent in the patients who developed AF (P < 0.001) though the vast majority of patients with these two independent risk factors remained in sinus rhythm through much or all of their follow-up period. We conclude that the incidence of AF is not of a magnitude to preclude DDD pacing in the vast majority of patients in sinus rhythm at implant.     

Improving the acceptability of the atrial defibrillator: patient-activated cardioversion versus automatic night cardioversion with and without sedation (ADSAS 2)

Acceptability of the atrial defibrillator is partly limited by concerns about shock related anxiety and discomfort. Sedation and/or automatic cardioversion therapy during sleep may ease shock discomfort and improve patient acceptability. Three atrial cardioversion techniques were compared: patient-activated cardioversion with sedation, automatic night cardioversion with sedation, and automatic night cardioversion without sedation. Sedation was oral midazolam (15 mg). Fifteen patients aged 60 +/- 13 years were assigned each strategy randomly for three consecutive episodes of persistent atrial fibrillation requiring cardioversion. Patients completed questionnaires for multiple parameters immediately and again at 24 hours postcardioversion. Atrial cardioversion strategies with oral sedation (patient-activated and automatic) significantly reduced shock recall by 77% (P < 0.005), therapy dissatisfaction by 57%-71% (P < 0.03), shock discomfort by 61%-73% (P < 0.01), shock pain by 79%-83% (P < 0.001), and shock intensity by 73%-77% (P < 0.03), compared to automatic night cardioversion without sedation (P < 0.02). Atrial shock pain was short-lived and caused little disruption to the patients' daily routines. Automatic night cardioversion without sedation, resulted in sleep disturbances not seen with the other strategies (42% vs 0%, P < 0.001) as well as concerns about future pain or discomfort. Twelve patients (80%) chose patient-activated cardioversion with sedation as their preferred treatment, and three (20%) remainder chose automatic night cardioversion with sedation. Ninety percent of patients chose automatic night cardioversion without sedation as the least acceptable therapy. Sedation significantly increases atrial shock acceptability regardless of cardioversion method. Shocks without sedation are significantly less acceptable to patients using the atrial defibrillators.     

Cardiac resynchronization therapy response is associated with shorter duration of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly associated with heart failure. The benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on atrial remodeling has been demonstrated. However, biventricular pacing did not reduce the global incidence of AF. We evaluated the relationship between CRT response and AF duration. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 96 patients (59 +/- 15 years; 78% male) who underwent CRT. All patients had class III-IV New York Heart Association (NYHA) symptoms despite maximal medical therapy, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or = 35%, QRS >130 ms, and sinus rhythm before implantation. CRT response in patients who survived at six months of follow-up was defined as: (1) no hospitalization for heart failure and (2) improvement of one or more grades in the NYHA classification. RESULTS: CRT responders (n = 54) and non-responders (n = 42) had similar baseline characteristics, including the incidence of persistent AF within six months before implantation. Six months after implantation, when compared to baseline, CRT responders exhibited a significant decrease in left atrial size (47.5 +/- 7.1 mm vs 44.6 +/- 7.7 mm, P < 0.01) and in the incidence of persistent AF (17% vs 2%, P = 0.02). At six months, CRT responders demonstrated shorter mean AF duration (7.5 +/- 43.3 hours vs 48.8 +/- 129.0 hours, P = 0.03) and lower incidence of persistent AF (2% vs 19%, P = 0.004) compared to nonresponders. CONCLUSION: CRT response is associated with a reversal of atrial remodeling and a shorter AF duration.     

Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation after Pulmonary Vein Ablation and the Impact on Quality of Life

Background: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the recurrences of atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFL) after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA) using repetitive long-term Holter recordings, and to evaluate the change in quality of life (QoL), especially in patients with asymptomatic AF recurrences.
Methods: A total of 149 patients with AF were followed up with 7-day Holter monitoring at 3, 6, and 12 months after CPVA. We calculated the burden of AF/AFL defined as the percentage of time in AF/AFL, and patients with documented arrhythmia were divided into isolated symptomatic episodes of arrhythmia, mixed symptomatic/asymptomatic arrhythmia, or isolated asymptomatic arrhythmia. The QoL was analyzed with SF-36 questionnaires in patients with sinus rhythm after CPVA, and in patients with recurrence of symptomatic and asymptomatic arrhythmia, respectively.
Results: Asymptomatic arrhythmia was observed in 44% of the patients with documented arrhythmia at 12 months of follow-up. In patients with persistent AF, 63% of the documented arrhythmia at 12 months of follow-up was asymptomatic and often persistent. In the subgroup of patients with asymptomatic arrhythmia, the QoL improved significantly in the physical scores, in contrast to patients with symptomatic arrhythmia who had unchanged or worsened QoL scores.
Conclusions: Asymptomatic arrhythmia is very common after AF ablation. Our data indicate that these patients improve their physical component of the QoL significantly, which may be considered a palliative success of treatment. We suggest that patients with asymptomatic AF recurrences are carefully evaluated before considering reablation. Repetitive rhythm monitoring after AF ablation is very important considering the postablation management of anticoagulant therapy.     

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients with Therapeutic International Normalized Ratios

Aims: Pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) plays a pivotal role in the comprehensive treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The need for effective anticoagulation bridging following PVAI is associated with significant vascular complication rates and increased costs.
We investigated the safety of PVAI in patients with therapeutic international normalized ratios (INR) the day of the procedure.
Methods: A case-control analysis was performed on patients who underwent PVAI with therapeutic INR (>2). Patients with normal preprocedure INR served as controls. The incidence of major and minor hematomas, fistulas, vascular injury, and cardiac perforation or tamponade were catalogued. PVAI was performed under fluoroscopic, electro-anatomical, and intracardiac echocardiographic guidance, with an open irrigation ablation technique.
Results: A total of 194 patients (mean age 64 ± 12) were included; 87 patients underwent PVAI with therapeutic INR (cases) and 107 with normal INR (controls). Persistent AF was more prevalent than paroxysmal AF in the therapeutic INR group. The mean INR for cases was 2.8 ± 0.7 compared to 1.4 ± 0.3 in the control group (P < 0.01). All procedures were completed without acute complications. Two major adverse events were observed, one in each arm. No significant difference in terms of minor (6.5% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.23) or major (0.93% vs. 1.15%, P = 0.49) vascular events or bleeding was detected between the therapeutic INR and the control group. The combined endpoint of major and minor complications did not differ among groups (9.35% vs. 8.05%, P = 0.19).
Conclusion: Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with therapeutic INR on the day of a procedure appears to be safe and feasible. Expensive outpatient anti-coagulation bridging may be safely avoided in this type of population.     

The electrical substrate of vagal atrial fibrillation as assessed by the signal-averaged electrocardiogram of the P wave

Background: The autonomic nervous system is thought to be involved in the initiation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is a distinct entity of vagal AF characterized by episodes occurring at rest, postprandially, or during sleep. The purpose of this study was to compare intraatrial conduction in patients with vagally mediated AF to those with nonvagal AF, using the signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) of P wave.
Methods: SAECG of P wave was performed in 58 patients with AF using the Marquette Medical System, and the mean filtered P-wave duration (SAPW) was measured. Nine patients were categorized as having pure vagal AF (Group I), and 42 patients as having nonvagal AF (Group II); the remaining seven patients were excluded from analysis because of incomplete data.
Results: The patients in Group I were significantly younger and more likely to have paroxysmal lone AF, as compared to those in Group II. There was no significant difference in left atrial size and left ventricular function in the two groups. The mean SAPW was significantly shorter in Group I when compared to Group II (118 ± 5 ms vs 149 ± 39 ms, P < 0.001). Whereas all patients in Group I had a normal SAPW, 79% of patients in Group II had an abnormal SAPW (P < 0.001). A normal SAPW was significantly predictive of vagal AF independent of other co-variables.
Conclusions: (1) Patients with vagal AF are younger, and invariably have paroxysmal lone AF. (2) SAPW is normal and significantly shorter in vagal AF when compared to patients with nonvagal AF. (3) This suggests that those in the vagal AF population have normal intraatrial conduction, which has implications for AF ablation in these patients.     

A Multicenter, Randomized Trial Comparing an Active Can Implantable Defibrillator with a Passive Can System

Replacing one defibrillation electrode lead by the defibrillator can may simplify implantation of the ICD. In this multicenter study, 304 patients were randomized to receive either the biphasic active can (AC) (model 7219C system, Medtronic, Inc.) or the passive can (PC) (model 7219D system). The AC and PC systems were compared with respect to their ability to meet the implant defibrillation criterion and to defibrillate VF, and to DFTs, implant time, patient adverse events, and survival rates. A higher percentage fulfilled the implant defibrillation criterion on the first configuration with the AC (86.3% vs 75.9% for PC; P = 0.023), and the first shock success for terminating induced VF was 94% for AC compared to 89% for PC (P = 0.026). DFTs were significantly lower (10.9 vs 12.7 J; P = 0.031), and implant time was significantly shorter for the AC patients (99.2 vs 112.0 min; P = 0.002). The two groups showed no significant differences in 3-month adverse event rates, 3-month survival, and hospital stay.