Dupilumab improves upper and lower airway disease control in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma

BackgroundChronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and type 2 asthma share the same inflammatory pathophysiology and are frequent comorbidities. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin 4 and interleukin 13, which are key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation.ObjectiveWe report the effect of dupilumab vs placebo on outcome measures of the upper and lower airways and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the pooled population of patients with CRSwNP and comorbid asthma from the phase 3 SINUS-24 (NCT02912468) and SINUS-52 (NCT02898454) studies.MethodsIn these randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, patients received subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg (n = 438) or placebo (n = 286) every 2 weeks on a background of mometasone furoate nasal spray. Changes from baseline at week 24 in the upper and lower airway outcome measures are reported.ResultsOf the 724 patients randomized, 428 (59.1%) had comorbid asthma. In patients with asthma at week 24, dupilumab vs placebo improved the nasal polyp score (?2.04), patient-reported nasal congestion score (?1.04), Lund-Mackay computed tomography scan score (?6.43), peak nasal inspiratory flow (46.15 L/min), and 22-item sinonasal outcome test score (?21.42; all P < .001). The forced expiratory volume in 1 second and 6-item asthma control questionnaire scores were also markedly improved with dupilumab vs placebo. The most common adverse events (nasopharyngitis, headache, injection-site erythema, worsening of nasal polyposis, and asthma) were more frequent with placebo than dupilumab.ConclusionDupilumab improved upper and lower airway outcome measures and HRQoL in patients with severe CRSwNP and comorbid asthma and was well tolerated.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02912468 (SINUS-24) and NCT02898454 (SINUS-52).     

Effect of omalizumab on lung function and eosinophil levels in adolescents with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma

BackgroundOmalizumab improves clinical outcomes in patients with asthma. Several studies have shown lung function improvements with omalizumab; however, this has not been examined exclusively in adolescents.ObjectiveTo assess the effect of omalizumab on lung function and eosinophil counts in adolescents with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe allergic asthma.MethodsIn this post hoc analysis, data from adolescents aged 12 to 17 years from 8 randomized trials of omalizumab were pooled (studies 008, 009, and 011, and SOLAR, INNOVATE, ALTO, ETOPA, and EXTRA). Changes from baseline to end of study in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁), percent predicted FEV₁ (ppFEV₁), forced vital capacity (FVC), and blood eosinophil counts were assessed by fitting an analysis of covariance model and calculating least squares mean (LSM) difference for omalizumab vs placebo.ResultsA total of 340 adolescents were identified (omalizumab, n = 203 [59.7%]; placebo, n = 137 [40.3%]). Omalizumab increased all baseline lung function variables more than placebo by end of study: LSM treatment differences (95% confidence interval) were 3.0% (0.2%-5.7%; P = .035), 120.9 mL (30.6-211.2 mL; P = .009), and 101.5 mL (8.3-194.6 mL; P = .033) for ppFEV₁, absolute FEV₁, and FVC, respectively. The LSM difference demonstrated a greater reduction in eosinophil counts for omalizumab vs placebo: −85.9 cells/μL (−137.1 to −34.6 cells/μL; P = .001).ConclusionOmalizumab was associated with lung function improvements and circulating eosinophil counts reductions in adolescents with moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma. Findings emphasize the effect of omalizumab in young patients and the need to optimize treatment early in the disease course. https://clinicaltrials.gov/: NCT00314574, NCT00046748, NCT00401596     

The long-term effect of dupilumab on dyspnea,sleep, and activity in oral corticosteroid-dependent severe asthma

BackgroundSevere asthma impacts quality of life (QoL), including dyspnea, sleep, and activity limitation. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for interleukins-4 and -13, which are key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. Phase 3 LIBERTY ASTHMA VENTURE (NCT02528214) and LIBERTY ASTHMA TRAVERSE open-label extension (NCT02134028) evaluated dupilumab 300 mg vs placebo every 2 weeks for 24 weeks (VENTURE) and dupilumab only for an additional 48 to 96 weeks (TRAVERSE) in patients with oral corticosteroid (OCS)-dependent severe asthma.ObjectiveTo assess dupilumab's impact on Asthma QoL Questionnaire (AQLQ) items related to breathing symptoms, sleep, and activity limitation, and on OCS reduction.MethodsThe proportion of patients with AQLQ scores of 6 or 7 for breathing symptoms-, sleeping-, and activity-related items in VENTURE and TRAVERSE, together with OCS dose reductions in VENTURE.ResultsIn VENTURE, significantly greater proportions of dupilumab- vs placebo-treated patients achieved scores of 6 or 7 by week 24 in breathing symptoms-related (42.7%-60.2% vs 22.4%-39.3%), sleeping-related (45.6%-65.0% vs 27.1%-47.7%), and activity-related (44.7%-51.5% vs 22.4%-34.6%) AQLQ items. Improvements were maintained through TRAVERSE in the dupilumab/dupilumab group and increased to dupilumab treatment levels in the placebo/dupilumab group. Significant OCS dose reductions were observed in VENTURE; up to 90% and 60% of dupilumab-treated vs 65% and 41% of placebo-treated patients with AQLQ scores of 6 or 7 in breathing symptoms-, sleeping-, and activity-related items achieved greater than or equal to 50% dose reduction and eliminated OCS at week 24, respectively.ConclusionIn patients with severe OCS-dependent asthma, dupilumab improved QoL related to breathing symptoms, sleep, and activity limitation, and reduced OCS use.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02528214 and NCT02134028.     

Benralizumab efficacy for patients with fixed airflow obstruction and severe,uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma

BackgroundFixed airflow obstruction (FAO) is associated with severe eosinophilic asthma. Benralizumab is an interleukin-5 receptor alpha–directed cytolytic monoclonal antibody for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma.ObjectiveWe evaluated FAO influence on benralizumab treatment response.MethodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of pooled phase III SIROCCO (NCT01928771) and CALIMA (NCT01914757) data for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with baseline blood eosinophil counts of 300 or more cells/μL who received benralizumab 30 mg every 8 weeks or placebo. Demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, and treatment responses were evaluated by FAO status. FAO+ and FAO− were defined as ratios of postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) to forced vital capacity of less than 70% and 70% or more, respectively, at baseline.ResultsFAO+ prevalence was 63% (935/1493). With benralizumab, similar annual asthma exacerbation rate (AER) reductions vs placebo were achieved for FAO+ and FAO− patients (rate ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.56 [0.44-0.71] and 0.58 [0.41-0.83], respectively), whereas annual AER reductions associated with emergency department visits or hospitalizations were greater for FAO+ vs FAO− patients (rate ratio [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.33-0.91] and 0.70 [0.33-1.48], respectively). Prebronchodilator FEV₁ (95% CI) increase from baseline to end of treatment was greater for FAO+ vs FAO− patients receiving benralizumab compared with placebo (0.159 L [0.082-0.236] vs 0.103 L [−0.008 to 0.215]). Other lung function measures, patient-reported outcomes, and symptom improvements were also numerically greater for FAO+ vs FAO− patients.ConclusionBenralizumab improved asthma control across several measures for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma and FAO.Trial RegistrationSIROCCO trial: NCT01928771 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01928771) CALIMA trial: NCT01914757 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01914757)     

No difference in omalizumab efficacy in patients with asthma by number of asthma-related and allergic comorbidities

BackgroundComorbidities are common in asthma and may complicate treatment response.ObjectiveTo examine response to omalizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma by asthma-related and allergic comorbidities.MethodsPatients aged 12 years or more from placebo-controlled 008/009 (n = 1071), EXTRA (n = 848), and INNOVATE (n = 419), and single-armed PROSPERO (n = 801) omalizumab studies were included. Poisson regression/analysis of covariance models were used to estimate adjusted exacerbation rates and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) change from baseline after omalizumab initiation for subgroups by number of comorbidities (0, 1 [008/009]; 0, 1, ≥2 [EXTRA and INNOVATE]; 0, 1, 2, ≥3 [PROSPERO]). Self-reported comorbidities included allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, recurrent acute sinusitis, nasal polyps, atopic and contact dermatitis, urticaria, food allergy, anaphylaxis, other allergies, gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.ResultsIn the EXTRA and INNOVATE studies, no consistent pattern was observed for placebo-corrected relative rate reduction in normalized asthma exacerbations among omalizumab-treated comorbidity subgroups. In PROSPERO, on-study exacerbation rates in the comorbidity subgroups were similar (0, 0.68; 1, 0.70; 2, 0.77; ≥3, 0.80). FEV1 improvements were observed throughout the study for omalizumab vs placebo for all comorbidity subgroups. There were no consistent differences in FEV1 improvements among comorbidity subgroups in 008/009, EXTRA, or INNOVATE. Similarly, no among-group differences were observed for FEV1 change from baseline at month 12 in PROSPERO (0, 0.05 L; 1, 0.08 L; 2, 0.00 L; ≥3, 0.04 L). The 95% confidence intervals overlapped substantially in all instances.ConclusionIn these analyses of placebo-controlled/single-armed studies, on-study exacerbation rates and FEV1 improvements with omalizumab treatment were similar irrespective of comorbidity burden.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifiers are as follows: EXTRA, NCT00314574 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00314574); INNOVATE, NCT00046748 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00046748); and PROSPERO, NCT01922037 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01922037).     

Evaluation of avoralstat,an oral kallikrein inhibitor,in a Phase 3 hereditary angioedema prophylaxis trial: The OPuS‐2 study

Background

Effective inhibition of plasma kallikrein may have significant benefits for patients with hereditary angioedema due to deficiency of C1 inhibitor (C1‐INH‐HAE) by reducing the frequency of angioedema attacks. Avoralstat is a small molecule inhibitor of plasma kallikrein. This study (OPuS‐2) evaluated the efficacy and safety of prophylactic avoralstat 300 or 500 mg compared with placebo.

Methods

OPuS‐2 was a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study. Subjects were administered avoralstat 300 mg, avoralstat 500 mg, or placebo orally 3 times per day for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the angioedema attack rate based on adjudicator‐confirmed attacks.

Results

A total of 110 subjects were randomized and dosed. The least squares (LS) mean attack rates per week were 0.589, 0.675, and 0.593 for subjects receiving avoralstat 500 mg, avoralstat 300 mg, and placebo, respectively. Overall, 1 subject in each of the avoralstat groups and no subjects in the placebo group were attack‐free during the 84‐day treatment period. The LS mean duration of all confirmed attacks was 25.4, 29.4, and 31.4 hours for the avoralstat 500 mg, avoralstat 300 mg, and placebo groups, respectively. Using the Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE‐QoL), improved QoL was observed for the avoralstat 500 mg group compared with placebo. Avoralstat was generally safe and well tolerated.

Conclusions

Although this study did not demonstrate efficacy of avoralstat in preventing angioedema attacks in C1‐INH‐HAE, it provided evidence of shortened angioedema episodes and improved QoL in the avoralstat 500 mg treatment group compared with placebo.     

Long-term efficacy of dupilumab in asthma with or without chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps

BackgroundCoexisting chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps (CRS-NPs) substantially increases the disease burden of asthma. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, has established efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in asthma and CRS with NP.ObjectiveTo evaluate long-term dupilumab efficacy in TRAVERSE (NCT02134028) patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe (QUEST) or oral corticosteroid (OCS)-dependent (VENTURE) asthma with or without coexisting CRS-NP.MethodsIn TRAVERSE, 317 of 1530 (21%) QUEST and 61 of 187 (48%) VENTURE patients had self-reported CRS-NP; they received subcutaneous 300 mg dupilumab every 2 weeks up to 96 weeks. Patients were categorized by parent study treatment group (placebo/dupilumab, dupilumab/dupilumab). End points included annualized asthma exacerbation rates and mean change from parent study baseline in prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second, Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 score, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score, and OCS dose.ResultsPatients with coexisting CRS-NP had higher OCS dose and a history of more exacerbations. Concluding TRAVERSE, exacerbation rates decreased from 2.39 to 0.32 and 2.32 to 0.35 in dupilumab/dupilumab and 2.36 to 0.41 and 2.36 to 0.45 in placebo/dupilumab by week 96 from QUEST and VENTURE baselines, respectively. Non-CRS-NP results were similar. Improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 score, and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score during parent studies were maintained in TRAVERSE; placebo/dupilumab patients achieved similar improvements to dupilumab/dupilumab by week 48. By week 96, 71% and 39% of OCS-dependent patients with CRS-NP and 83% and 47% without CRS-NP treated with dupilumab/dupilumab and placebo/dupilumab, respectively, stopped OCS.ConclusionLong-term dupilumab efficacy was maintained in patients with asthma with or without self-reported coexisting CRS-NP, including OCS-sparing effects observed in OCS-dependent severe asthma.Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02528214, NCT02414854, and NCT02134028.     

Effects of lactoferrin on infectious diseases in Japanese summer: A randomized,double-blinded,placebo-controlled trial

PurposeTo investigate the effects of lactoferrin (LF) on infectious diseases in Japanese summer.MethodsAn intake of placebo, 200 mg, or 600 mg of LF were administered to healthy adults in Kyushu University of Health and Welfare for 12 weeks in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled parallel-group comparative trial. The primary endpoints were the prevalence and duration of infectious diseases and changes in immune parameters.ResultsThree hundred and ten subjects were randomized (placebo, n = 104; 200 mg, n = 103; 600 mg, n = 103). Twenty subjects were lost to the follow-up, leaving 290 for a full analysis set (n = 99; n = 95; n = 96). The duration (day) of total infectious diseases was shorter in the 200 mg group (2.0, p = 0.045) and 600 mg group (2.0, p = 0.010) than in the placebo group (3.0). The duration of summer colds was shorter in the 600 mg group (2.0, p = 0.036) than in the placebo group (3.0). No significant differences were observed in the prevalence of infectious diseases or changes in immune parameters. In exploratory investigations, changes in the neutrophil phagocytic capacity, cortisol concentrations, and T score of “Vigor/Activity” in the Profile of Mood States 2 were greater in the 600 mg group than in the placebo group, when analysis was done on the lower half groups at the baseline. Adverse events were similar in each group and none had a causal relationship with the intake of the test foods.ConclusionsIn summer, the intake of LF attenuates infectious diseases, including summer colds.     

Validation of four single-item patient-reported assessments of sleep in adult atopic dermatitis patients

BackgroundThe optimal approaches for monitoring sleep disturbances in adults with atopic dermatitis (AD) is not established. Multiple patient-reported outcome measures for AD and itch have sleep-related items. These items have not been validated previously.ObjectiveAssess the measurement properties of sleep-related items from the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), SCORing AD (SCORAD), 5-dimensions of itch (5D), and ItchyQOL in adults with AD.MethodsWe performed a prospective dermatology practice-based study using questionnaires and evaluation by a dermatologist (n = 115).ResultsThere was modest overlap and weak-moderate concordance of responses to the different assessments. Regarding concurrent validity, POEM-sleep, SCORAD-sleep, 5D-sleep, and ItchyQOL-sleep showed moderate correlations with each other. Regarding convergent validity, all items showed moderate correlation with total POEM, but weak correlations with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), objective and total SCORAD, moderate to strong correlations with mean ItchyQOL and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), but poor or no significant correlation with Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for worst or average itch. Regarding discriminant validity, all items showed significant and stepwise increases with increasing self-reported and physician-reported AD severity (Kruskal-Wallis, P < .01 for all). Floor effects were observed for POEM-sleep (n = 53, 46.1%), SCORAD-sleep (n = 28, 24.4%), 5D-sleep (n = 41, 35.7%), and ItchyQOL-sleep (n = 33, 28.7%); no ceiling effects were observed. Change in sleep-related item scores showed moderate strong correlations with change in POEM, 5Ditch, mean ItchyQOL, DLQI, objective and total SCORAD, and EASI, but inconsistent correlations with change of itch severity.ConclusionSleep-related items from POEM, SCORAD, 5D and ItchyQOL showed good validity and responsiveness to monitor sleep disturbances in adult AD patients.     

Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid in patients not receiving statins in phase 3 clinical trials

BackgroundDespite the high incidence of patients with statin tolerance problems, randomized evaluations of nonstatin oral treatment options for lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in this population are sparse.ObjectiveTo assess the LDL-C lowering effect of bempedoic acid in patients not taking statins.MethodsThis was a pooled analysis of data from patients enrolled in four phase 3 bempedoic acid studies (12 to 52 weeks in duration) who were not taking concomitant statins (Phase 3 No Statin Cohort) and a phase 3 bempedoic acid plus ezetimibe fixed-dose combination study (BA+EZE FDC No Statin Cohort). The primary endpoint for all studies was the percent change from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C levels. Safety and tolerability were assessed by laboratory values and adverse events.ResultsIn the Phase 3 No Statin Cohort, bempedoic acid (n = 394) lowered LDL-C levels at week 12 significantly more than placebo (n = 192; ?26.5% [95% CI, ?29.7%, ?23.2%]; P<0.001). The fixed-dose combination of bempedoic acid with ezetimibe lowered LDL-C by 39.2% (95% CI, ?51.7% to ?26.7%; P<0.001). Muscle-related disorders occurred at a rate of 26.4 and 28.6 per 100 person-years with bempedoic acid and placebo, respectively.ConclusionsIn patients with hypercholesterolemia unable to take statins, bempedoic acid lowered LDL-C levels by a mean of 26.5% vs placebo and bempedoic acid + ezetimibe fixed-dose combination lowered LDL-C by 39.2%. The treatments were generally well tolerated, suggesting that bempedoic acid may be efficacious and well tolerated in this challenging-to-treat patient population.     

Secondary Prevention Risk Interventions via Telemedicine and Tailored Patient Education (SPRITE): A randomized trial to improve post myocardial infarction management

ObjectiveWe evaluated the impact of a low intensity web-based and intensive nurse-administered intervention to reduce systolic blood pressure (SBP) among patients with prior MI.MethodsSecondary Prevention Risk Interventions via Telemedicine and Tailored Patient Education (SPRITE) was a three-arm trial. Patients were randomized to 1) post-MI education-only; 2) nurse-administered telephone program; or 3) web-based interactive tool. The study was conducted 2009–2013.ResultsParticipants (n = 415) had a mean age of 61 years (standard deviation [SD], 11). Relative to the education-only group, the 12-month differential improvement in SBP was ? 3.97 and ? 3.27 mmHg for nurse-administered telephone and web-based groups, respectively. Neither were statistically significant. Post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses found participants who received a higher dose (>12 encounters) in the nurse-administered telephone intervention (n = 60; 46%) had an 8.8 mmHg (95% CI, 0.69, 16.89; p = 0.03) differential SBP improvement versus low dose (<11 encounters; n = 71; 54%). For the web-based intervention, those who had higher dose (n = 73; 53%; >1 web encounter) experienced a 2.3 mmHg (95% CI, ?10.74, 6.14; p = 0.59) differential SBP improvement versus low dose (n = 65; 47%).ConclusionsThe main effects were not statistically significant.Practical ImplicationsCompleting the full dose of the intervention may be essential to experience the intervention effect.Clinical Trial RegistrationThe unique identifier is NCT00901277 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00901277?term=NCT00901277&rank=1).     

Omalizumab rapidly improves angioedema‐related quality of life in adult patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: X‐ACT study data

Background

The X‐ACT study aimed to examine the effect of omalizumab treatment on quality of life (QoL) in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients with angioedema refractory to high doses of H₁‐antihistamines.

Methods

In X‐ACT, a phase III, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, CSU patients (18‐75 years) with ≥4 angioedema episodes during the 6 months before inclusion were randomized (1:1) to receive omalizumab 300 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 28 weeks. Angioedema‐related QoL, skin‐related QoL impairment, and psychological well‐being were assessed.

Results

Ninety‐one patients were randomized and 68 (omalizumab, n = 35; placebo, n = 33) completed the 28‐week treatment period. At baseline, the mean (SD) total Angioedema QoL (AE‐QoL; 56.2 [18.7] and 59.9 [19.2]) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; 14.6 [5.7] and 16.6 [7.3]) score were high in the omalizumab and placebo group, respectively. At Week 4 (after the first treatment), the least squares mean difference in the AE‐QoL and DLQI score between groups was ?17.6 (P < .001) and ?7.2 (P < .001), respectively. Significant QoL improvements in the omalizumab vs placebo groups continued until Week 28, but returned to placebo levels at the follow‐up visit. The mean (SD) baseline 5‐item World Health Organization Well‐being Index was 10.0 (5.5, omalizumab) and 7.7 (5.3, placebo), which increased above the depression threshold (<13) from Week 4 and throughout with omalizumab but not placebo treatment. Compared to placebo, omalizumab was also associated with decreased fear of suffocation due to angioedema.

Conclusions

Our findings support omalizumab treatment in patients with severe H1‐antihistamine‐refractory CSU with angioedema.

     

Hydroxychloroquine in mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019: a placebo-controlled double blind trial

ObjectivesTo determine whether hydroxychloroquine decreases the risk of adverse outcome in patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at high risk of worsening.MethodsWe conducted a multicentre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients with at least one of the following risk factors for worsening: need for supplemental oxygen, age ≥75 years, age between 60 and 74 years and presence of at least one co-morbidity. Severely ill patients requiring oxygen therapy >3 L/min or intensive care were excluded. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 800 mg hydroxychloroquine on day 0 followed by 400 mg per day for 8 days or a placebo. The primary end point was a composite of death or start of invasive mechanical ventilation within 14 days following randomization. Secondary end points included mortality and clinical evolution at days 14 and 28, and viral shedding at days 5 and 10.ResultsThe trial was stopped after 250 patients were included because of a slowing down of the pandemic in France. The intention-to-treat population comprised 123 and 124 patients in the placebo and hydroxychloroquine groups, respectively. The median age was 77 years (interquartile range 58–86 years) and 151/250 (60.4%) patients required oxygen therapy. The primary end point occurred in 9/124 (7.3%) patients in the hydroxychloroquine group and 8/123 (6.5%) patients in the placebo group (relative risk 1.12; 95% CI 0.45–2.80). The rates of positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests at days 5 and 10 were 72.8% (75/103) and 57.1% (52/91) in the hydroxychloroquine group, versus 73.0% (73/100) and 56.6% (47/83) in the placebo group, respectively. No difference was observed between the two groups in any of the other secondary end points.ConclusionIn this underpowered trial involving mainly older patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, patients treated with hydroxychloroquine did not experience better clinical or virological outcomes than those receiving the placebo.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04325893 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04325893).     

Relating microarray component testing and reported food allergy and food-triggered atopic dermatitis: a real-world analysis

BackgroundHigh epitope diversity has been associated with increased IgE-mediated food allergy severity.ObjectiveTo characterize associations between results from an automated microarray system and self-reported food allergy and food-triggered atopic dermatitis (AD).MethodsFamilies with food allergic children were identified from a Jewish community in Lakewood, New Jersey, with immediate family members without food allergy or food-triggered AD serving as controls for the identified children. Sets of microarray components analyzed were to milk (Bos d 4, Bos d 5, Bos d 8, Bos d lactoferrin), egg (Gal d 1, Gal d 2, Gal d 3, Gal d 5), and peanut (Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, Ara h 6).ResultsSeventy-three patients from 23 families were recruited. Culprit foods included milk (n = 20), egg (n = 10), and peanut (n = 6) for food allergy and milk (n = 10) and egg (n = 7) for food-triggered AD. Odds of having had a self-reported related food allergy or food-triggered AD reaction significantly increased with a higher number of detectable microarray components to that food. Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 6 were individually associated with reported peanut allergy, and Bos d 4 was individually associated with reported milk allergy. The number of egg components significantly increased the odds of having related food-triggered AD.ConclusionHigh diversity of food allergen components relates well to self-reported history of food allergy and food-associated AD.     

Efficacy of dupilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma and persistent airflow obstruction

BackgroundThe 52-week, phase 3 LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST study (NCT02414854) in patients aged above or equal to 12 years with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma demonstrated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab 200 mg and 300 mg every 2 weeks vs matched placebo.ObjectiveTo assess whether dupilumab improves clinical outcomes in QUEST patients with persistent airflow obstruction (PAO) defined as post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity ratio less than 0.7 at baseline.MethodsEnd points were annualized rate of severe exacerbations, pre and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second over time, proportion achieving reversal of PAO, and quality of life. Efficacy was evaluated in patients with or without PAO at baseline in subpopulations with eosinophils ≥ 150 cells/µL or fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) ≥ 25 ppb or eosinophils ≥ 300 cells/µL and FeNO ≥ 25 ppb.ResultsOf 1902 patients enrolled in QUEST, 1039 (55%) had PAO at baseline. Dupilumab vs placebo rapidly and significantly improved lung function in patients with PAO and elevated type 2 inflammatory biomarkers at baseline. Dupilumab improved probability of reversing airflow obstruction (hazard ratio vs placebo 1.616 [95% confidence interval, 1.272-2.052] and 1.813 [1.291-2.546]; both P < .001) and significantly reduced severe exacerbations by 69% (relative risk, 0.411; 95% confidence interval [0.327-0.516]; P < .0001) and by 75% (0.252 [0.178-0.356]; P < .0001) in patients with PAO with eosinophils ≥ 150 cells/µL or FeNO ≥ 25 ppb and eosinophils ≥ 300 cells/µL and FeNO ≥ 25 ppb, respectively. Similar results were observed in patient subgroups without PAO.ConclusionIn patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma, treatment with dupilumab facilitates reversal of PAO status and improves clinical outcomes.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02414854.     

Exercise interventions in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AimsTo assess the potential multi-domain benefits of exercise interventions on patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), as well as to determine the specific effects of different exercise modalities (aerobic, strength, or combined training).MethodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science until March 2021 for randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of exercise interventions (compared with no exercise) on patients with AD. Outcomes included cognitive function (mini-mental state examination [MMSE] test), physical function (e.g., 6-minute walking test [6MWT]), functional independence (Barthel index), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory [NPI]). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted.Results28 studies (total n = 1337 participants, average age 79–90 years) were included in the systematic review, of which 21 could be meta-analyzed. Although considerable heterogeneity was found, exercise interventions induced several significant benefits, including in Barthel index (n = 147 patients, mean difference [MD]=8.36 points, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.63–16.09), 6MWT (n = 369, MD=84 m, 95% CI=44–133)), and NPI (n = 263, MD=−4.4 points, 95% CI=−8.42 to −0.38). Benefits were also found in the MMSE test, albeit significance was only reached for aerobic exercise (n = 187, MD=2.31 points, 95% CI 0.45–4.27).ConclusionsExercise interventions appear to exert multi-domain benefits in patients with AD.     

The Influence of Adding Diphenhydramine Before Initiation of Moderate Sedation with Midazolam and Pethidine for Improving Quality of Colonoscopy

BackgroundCombination of Intravenous benzodiazepines with opiates appears to be essential in order to guarantee high quality of moderate sedation during colonoscopy. Diphenhydramine is recommended for endoscopic procedures in difficult-to-sedate patients However, the studies supporting its use have yielded conflicting results.ObjectiveTo assess the value of adding diphenhydramine hydrochloride before initiation of moderate sedation with midazolam and pethidine for Improving Quality of Sedation during colonoscopy.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 150 Patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. Of 150 patients, data were analyzed for 100 patients randomized into two groups: Diphenhydramine group (n = 53) received 50 mg of diphenhydramine intravenously before initiation of moderate sedation with pethidine and midazolam while in placebo group (n = 47) received placebo in addition to pethidine and midazolam. Amount of pethidine and midazolam used and Quality of sedation were assessed.ResultsThe mean doses of pethidine was significantly higher in placebo group as compared to diphenhydramine group (69.9 ± 35.4 mg vs 61.2 ± 21.0 mg, p < 0.01) However, no significant difference between the two groups regarding midazolam mean dose (4.9.±2.1 mg vs 4.8 ± 2.0 mg,p = 0.786). More patients in diphenhydramine group were being very satisfied with the procedure as compared to those in placebo group (88.67% vs 59.57%,p < 0.001).Furthermore more endoscopist in diphenhydramine group were being very satisfied with the procedure as compared to those in placebo group (77.35% vs 51.06%,p < 0.001).ConclusionsIntravenous diphenhydramine hydrochloride given before initiation of midazolam and pethidine offers a significant Improvement of Quality of moderate Sedation during colonoscopy without increasing the number of sedation related complications.     

Changes in cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study with the Chinese herbal medicine fuzhisan

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of fuzhisan (FZS, 10 mg/day), a Chinese herbal medicine, on cerebral glucose metabolism and neuropsychological metrics in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). This was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Twenty-two subjects were randomly assigned to groups that received FZS (n = 12) or placebo (n = 10). Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to study the regional cerebral metabolic rate of glucose consumption (rCMRglc) at baseline and week 12. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of FZS on cognition and behavioral functions using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Neuropsychiatric Index (NPI), respectively. Compared with placebo, FZS significantly improved ADAS-Cog scores and NPI scores at week 12. Moreover, FZS treatment favorably improved rCMRglc in the bilateral temporal and parietal cortices, hippocampus, and posterior cingulate gyrus. These results suggest that FZS treatment may have a positive effect on cognition, behavioral functions, and rCMRglc in mild-to-moderate AD patients.     

Combination of Linear Accelerator–Based Intensity-Modulated Total Marrow Irradiation and Myeloablative Fludarabine/Busulfan: A Phase I Study

Here we examined the addition of intensity-modulated total marrow irradiation (TMI) delivered using a linear accelerator to a myeloablative chemotherapy conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this phase I study, we enrolled 14 patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies who received escalating doses of TMI at 3 Gy (n = 3), 6 Gy (n = 3), 9 Gy (n = 6), and 12 Gy (n = 2) in combination with intravenous (i.v.) fludarabine 160 mg/m² and targeted busulfan (area under the curve, 4800 μM*minute). Peripheral blood mobilized stem cells were obtained from HLA-matched related (n = 9) or unrelated (n = 4) or 1 antigen-mismatched unrelated (n = 1) donors. All patients rapidly engrafted and recovered their immune cells. Overall, Bearman extrahematologic toxicity were limited to grades 1 or 2, with oral mucositis grade 1 in 64% and grade 2 in 36% of the patients. With a median follow-up of 1126 days (range, 362 to 1469) for living patients, the overall survival was 50% and relapse-free survival was 43%. Of 7 deaths, 3 were due to relapse and 4 to transplantation-related complications. We conclude that 9 Gy TMI can be combined with myeloablative chemotherapy in the design of new preparative regimens for HSCT. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00988013.     

Antagonism of the interleukin 4 receptor α promotes TH1-signalling among T cells from patients with atopic dermatitis after stimulation

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory skin disease. Molecular characterization of AD shows an underlying inflammation with tissue infiltration of T helper (T_H) 2 cells and increased IL-4 and IL-13. The multifaceted roles of IL-4 and IL-13 in allergic disease development make IL-4Rα an attractive target for treatment strategies, and a neutralizing monoclonal antibody which antagonizes the effects of both IL-4 and IL-13 by blocking the interaction site found in the IL-4 receptor subunit α (IL-4Rα) has been successfully used to treat patients with moderate-to-severe AD. To elucidate the effects of IL-4Rα blockade on the cellular level, we used flow cytometry to examine cytokine production after antigen stimulation in human T cells from patients with AD (n = 12) and healthy controls (n = 6). The cells were stimulated with and without a neutralizing monoclonal antibody against IL-4Rα. Our results indicate that blocking IL-4Rα prohibits IL-4 signalling and IL-13 signalling and thereby T_H2 differentiation followed by an upregulation of interferon-γ-producing cells.