Evaluation of a quantitative RT-PCR assay to detect HER2 mRNA overexpression for diagnosis and selection of trastuzumab therapy in breast cancer tissue samples

Breast cancer patients who have a positive result for HER2 overexpression are commonly treated with Herceptin, a HER2-targeted therapy. In the present study, the BrightGen HER2 RT-qDx (Syantra, Calgary, Canada), which is based on a one-tube nested RT-qPCR method that detects HER2 mRNA overexpression, was clinically evaluated in a total of 237 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples from breast cancer patients. Among the 38 HER2 positive samples, which were determined via IHC/FISH methods, 13 samples out of 16 (81.3%) that were IHC2 +/FISH + and 22 samples out of 22 (100%) that were IHC3 + have been decided positive for HER2 expression via the RT-qPCR method. The true positivity and false positivity results for the RT-qPCR were 92% (35/38) and 2% (1/65), respectively. The concordance between RT-qPCR and IHC results and RT-qPCR and IHC/FISH was 87.2% and 92.1%, respectively. Conclusively, the BrightGen HER2 RT-qDx may be a reliable and convenient method that can supplement traditional IHC and FISH methods for efficient use of trastuzumab.     

Evaluation of BrightGen HR RT-qDx assay to detect nuclear receptors mRNA overexpression in FFPE breast cancer tissue samples for selection of tamoxifen therapy

Breast cancer is a significant cause of death in women. Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) are important prognostic factors indicating higher recovery rate in the breast cancer patients. Currently, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining is a conventional method to identify expression of ER and PR. If a breast cancer patient expresses ER or PR, a chemotherapy with estrogen inhibitors such as tamoxifen is supposed to be effective. Although IHC staining is a reliable method, it may not a useful method for continuous monitoring of ER and PR expression changes in multiple breast cancer patients. In the present study, we evaluated an alternative method of IHC for detection of ER and PR expression. A quantitative RT-PCR method called ‘the BrightGen HR RT-qDx assay’ was employed to detect mRNA expression of the nuclear receptors in 199 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast cancer tissue samples. Among the ER/PR positive samples by IHC, 83 were determined positive and 16 were determined negative for the nuclear receptor mRNA by the quantitative RT-PCR method. Among the ER/PR negative samples by IHC, 37 were determined negative and 2 were determined positive by the quantitative RT-PCR method. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the quantitative RT-PCR method were 83.8% and 94.8% (P = 0.0026), respectively. We also optimized the quantitative RT-PCR method by setting up the diagnostic cut-off value using the likelihood ratio. The highest likelihood ratio was when the expression levels of the relative nuclear receptor mRNA passed 103.3 at which sensitivity and specificity was highest. These data suggest that BrightGen HR RT-qDx assay could be an alternative method for detection of the prognostic factors of nuclear receptors expressed in breast cancer patients for providing essential information for therapeutic application of tamoxifen.     

Evaluation of analytical accuracy of HER2 status in patients with breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene status and overexpression, occurring in ~ 13.6% of primary breast cancers, is essential for identifying patients likely to benefit from biological treatment. In this method of evaluation study, we tested and compared the HER2 gene–protein assay (GPA) with routine HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The GPA was evaluated using 67 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) HER2 equivoval IHC (2+) breast cancer tissue samples. Overall, agreement between GPA silver in situ hybridization (SISH) and FISH was 91.9% (57/62). Regression analysis revealed slightly higher, but non-significant difference in HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) ratio for GPA as compared to FISH (p = 0.074). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.94 and Spearman´s rank correlation coefficients of 0.93 (p < 0.0001) for FISH and GPA SISH suggested strong inter-observer association for methods with one observer counting on average 0.23 significant higher for GPA SISH (p = 0.014). Intra-observer IHC method reproducibility was 52.6% (κ = 0.3122, p = 0.004) and 79.7% (κ = 0.6428, p = 0.9197), suggesting fair significant and substantial non-significant difference between tests for reviewers. Inter-observer reproducibility for IHC methods was 53%. While inter-observer reproducibility for experienced IHC interpretation suggested significant differences (κ = 0.3636, p = 0.0332), unexperienced interpretation of IHC GPA suggested fair non-significant difference between reviewers (κ = 0.3101, p = 0.0747). Using FISH as reference, the diagnostic indices for GPA SISH were as follows: sensitivity 100%, specificity 95% and accuracy 92%. Inaccuracy between tests was in 80% of cases due to ISH categorization as equivocal by one of the methods. IHC results highlight that it may be beneficial with a method for simultaneously visualization of HER2 gene and protein status.     

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction is an alternative method for the detection of HER-2 amplification in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast cancer samples

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are the most common methods that are used to quantify HER-2 gene and protein levels, respectively, in human breast cancer. However, due to bad sample quality, some samples are unable to be subjected to a FISH assay. We evaluated 71 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast carcinoma specimens by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), IHC, and FISH. We also performed qPCR and FISH assays on delayed formalin-fixed (DDF) samples. The qPCR results were in complete concordance with the results of IHC and FISH. In regards to the DDF samples, the HER-2 fluorescent signal seemed decayed compared with that of the DDF samples after 1 h. However, the qPCR method still works well up to 12 hours. Our results indicated that qPCR was obviously superior to FISH in cases that were not fixed in a reasonable amount of time. However, qPCR can be an alternative method by which to perform HER2 amplification assays in breast cancer.     

Histological tumor grade correlates with HER2/c-erB-2 status in invasive breast cancer: a comparative analysis between immunohistochemical (CB11 clone and Herceptest), FISH and differential PCR procedures

There is a growing clinical demand for analysis of the HER2/c-erbB-2 (HER2) status of breast cancer specimens because it provides valuable prognostic, predictive and therapeutic information. In this sense, a variety of methods is available for detection of HER2 status, although to date a reliable and sensitive test does not exist. In order to choose the most suitable procedure to assess HER2 status, we analyzed 102 invasive breast cancers for HER2 overexpression by means of immunohistochemistry (IHC), with the CB11 Mo-Ab and the Hercep Test kit, and for HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hyubridization (FISH) and differential PCR (dPCR). HER2 overexpression, determined by CB11 (group C) and HercepTest (2+ and 3+), was observed in 19 samples (18.6%) whereas genetic amplification was detected in 31 (30.4%) and 14 (13.7%) cases by FISH and dPCR, respectively. The majority of overexpressed/amplified specimens corresponded to high grade tumors. We found concordances of 78-80% and 93-95% between IHC vs FISH and IHC vs dPCR, respectively. Considering FISH procedure as a gold standard, we found a sensitivity and specificity of 48.4% and 94.3% for CB11 antibody, of 45.2% and 92.9% for HercepTest, and of 45.2% and for 100% for the dPCR. Thus, considering the sensitivity, specificity and the high grade of concordance between IHC and dPCR, we suggest the use of IHC for assessing HER2 status. However, due that sensitivity of IHC test is lower than FISH, we also suggest to carry out FISH on those cass in which IHC results are not definitive for its clinical evaluation.     

Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer: results from a validation study

Aims:  Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression/amplification is implicated in the development of various solid tumour types. Validated methods and scoring systems for evaluating HER2 status exist in breast cancer, but not in gastric cancer. The aim was to establish a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer to identify suitable patients for enrolment in a trial of trastuzumab (Herceptin^®) in advanced metastatic gastric cancer.
Methods and results:  Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded gastric cancer samples were tested for HER2 status using the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) pharmDx™ kit (Dako Denmark A/S). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using the HercepTest™ (Dako). Concordance between FISH and IHC was 93.5% in 168 evaluable samples. Eleven samples were scored as FISH+ but IHC− or equivocal.
Conclusions:  IHC/FISH discrepancies were attributed to basolateral membranous immunoreactivity of glandular cells resulting in incomplete membranous reactivity and/or a higher rate of tumour heterogeneity in gastric cancer compared with breast cancer. With modifications to the IHC scoring system, the HercepTest™ is considered valid for the identification of HER2+ gastric tumours for this clinical trial. Correlation of HER2 scores with clinical outcomes will be needed to determine which patients might benefit from trastuzumab therapy.     

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer: correlation with clinical pathological features

The overexpressed HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) is a valuable therapeutic target. Precise assessment of HER2 status is thus crucial in the treatment of breast cancer. In this study, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples of tumors from 304 breast cancer patients who underwent curative surgery procedures between 2011 and 2014 were tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a primary estimate of HER2 status, followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Concordance rate between IHC and FISH was evaluated. The Χ² test was used to evaluate the correlation between HER2 gene amplification status and different clinical pathological features including: (estrogen receptor) ER and (progesterone receptor) PR expression, age, menopausal status and tumor size. The results show that 84.8% of IHC score 3+ cases and 6.2% of IHC score 0/1+ cases were amplified by FISH. After exclusion of group IHC 2+, the concordance rate between FISH and IHC was 87.4%. There was a significant inverse association between expression of hormone receptors (ER and PR) and HER2 amplification (P < 0.001) among the patients studied. However, no relationship was observed between HER2 amplification and age, menopausal status and tumor size (P > 0.05). The data demonstrate a relatively high level of concordance rate for HER2 testing between FISH and IHC, and HER2 overexpression was associated with the levels of ER and PR.     

Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) to detect HER2 gene amplification in breast and gastric cancer: Comparison with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

The chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assay, designed to detect the amplification of the HER2 gene in formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) breast cancer (BC) and gastric cancer (GC) tissue specimens, was evaluated in 125 FFPE BC cases and 198 FFPE GC cases for which the HER2 status had been predetermined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In the 125 BC cases and the 198 gastric cases, we found a very good concordance (98.4% and 99.0%, respectively) between CISH and FISH. In particular, we evaluated the polysomy cases, as these cases often have ambiguous treatment options in clinical practice. The polysomy of chromosome 17 was defined as the presence of three or more CEP17 signals in at least 10% of the tumor cells. In the 50 BC cases and 54 GC cases displaying chromosome 17 polysomy, the concordance between FISH and CISH was 98.0% and 98.1%, respectively. These results indicate that CISH could provide an accurate and practical alternative to FISH for the clinical diagnosis of HER2 gene amplification in FFPE BC and FFPE GC samples.     

Simultaneous detection of HER2/neu gene amplification and protein overexpression in paraffin-embedded breast cancer

The determination of HER2/neu status in breast carcinomas has become essential for the selection of breast cancer patients for Herceptin therapy. Herceptin treatment is used in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma with HER2/neu protein overexpression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or gene amplification analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). A multiparametric fluorescent approach based on the simultaneous detection of HER2/neu gene amplification and protein expression was established to increase the accuracy, and to improve the reproducibility, of HER2/neu diagnostics. Based on four paraffin-embedded breast cancer cell lines, a combined fluorescent immunostaining (FIHC) and FISH method was developed by using the PathVysion HER2 DNA Probe Kit (VYSIS) and the polyclonal antibody from the HercepTest (DAKO). Diagnostic applicability was documented on 215 formalin-fixed primary breast carcinomas. Criteria for immunofluorescence quantification were chosen by analogy with the FDA-approved HercepTest scoring, ranging from 0 to 3+. There was 97.7% concordance between conventional IHC and fluorescence IHC. The FISH data resulting from the multiparametric approach did not differ from conventional FISH. Breast carcinomas with HER2/neu protein overexpression and simultaneous gene amplification were detected with 100% sensitivity. In addition, five of the 215 cases (2.3%) had HER2/neu gene amplification without protein overexpression. The main advantage of this novel approach is that polysomy, aneuploidy, gene amplification, and protein content can be analysed simultaneously in the same cell.     

Chromogenic in situ hybridization compared with other approaches to evaluate HER2/neu status in breast carcinomas

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has been evaluated in breast cancer patients to identify those most likely to benefit from herceptin-targeted therapy. HER2 amplification, detected in 20-30% of invasive breast tumors, is associated with reduced survival and metastasis. The most frequently used technique for evaluating HER2 protein status as a routine procedure is immunohistochemistry (IHC). HER2 copy number alterations have also been evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in moderate immunoexpression (IHC 2+) cases. An alternative procedure to evaluate gene amplification is chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), which has some advantages over FISH, including the correlation between HER2 status and morphological features. Other methodologies have also been used, such as silver-enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) and quantitative real-time RT-PCR, to determine the number of HER2 gene copies and expression, respectively. Here we will present a short and comprehensive review of the current advances concerning HER2 evaluation in human breast cancer.     

Correlation of HER2 gene amplification with immunohistochemistry in breast cancer as determined by a novel monoplex polymerase chain reaction assay.

Amplification of the HER2 oncogene in breast cancer identifies patients who are likely to respond to anti-HER2 mAb therapy. Current clinical practice dictates that all breast cancers first undergo HER2 screening by IHC. Strongly positive (3+ on a 0-to-3+ scale) IHC cases are considered as HER2-amplified tumors and are not evaluated further because of the strong correlation between HER2 gene amplification as measured by FISH and 3+ IHC. This strong correlation has recently been questioned, and some data suggest that over 50% of 3+ IHC HER2 immunostains may not be due to HER2 gene amplification. To help resolve this discrepancy, the authors developed a quantitative PCR assay for HER2. Quantitative PCR was used to determine the amount of HER2 DNA relative to a control gene, IF2 (eukaryotic translation initiation factor, 2p11.1-q11.1). The PCR assay is performed on genomic DNA isolated from paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissue. The PCR assay developed is a monoplex assay in which the HER2 and IF2 PCRs are performed in separate cuvettes. Cases of HER2 FISH amplified breast cancer and HER2 FISH nonamplified breast cancer were chosen for study by monoplex HER2 PCR. HER2 overexpression was evaluated by IHC. Twenty-two cases of HER2-positive and 22 cases of HER2-negative breast cancer, as determined by FISH, were assayed for HER2 by PCR and IHC. Sixteen of the 44 cases were interpreted as 3+ IHC. All 16 showed HER2 amplification by PCR and 15 showed HER2 amplification by FISH. One FISH negative case was found to be HER2 amplified by PCR and showed 3+ IHC stain, suggesting the FISH result in this case was underinterpreted. Two FISH positive cases were found to be negative by PCR and negative in IHC as well, suggesting the FISH result in these cases was overinterpreted. The authors conclude that 3+ IHC membrane staining correctly identifies neoplasms showing HER2 gene amplification. Monoplex HER2 PCR may offer significant advantages over both IHC and FISH for HER2 testing in breast cancer.     

HER2 status in gastric cancer: A comparison of two novel in situ hybridization methods (IQ FISH and dual color SISH) and two immunohistochemistry methods (A0485 and HercepTest™)

In contrast to breast HER2 testing, the optimal ISH method and antibody for gastric HER2 testing are unclear. The aim of this study was to find out gastric HER2 positivity rates in our institutional data, and to compare the two novel ISH methods with A0485 antibody and HercepTest™. IHC and ISH were carried out on gastrectomy specimens of 88 patients up to the standardly advised procedure protocols, and interpretations were also carried out up to widely accepted international protocols., HER2 expression was (−) in 65, (+) in 5, (++) in 6, and (+++) in 12 cases by A0485 IHC. IHC (+) 4 cases and (++) 3 cases were (−) by HercepTest™. One IHC (−) amplified case was (++) by HercepTest™. All A0485 and HercepTest™ (+++) 12 cases were amplified by ISH. HER2 amplification was detected in 18 (20.4%) and in 15 (17.2%) cases by SISH and FISH, respectively. Of the 18 cases, 4 showed focal heterogeneous low level amplification by SISH. Focal amplification was noted in only 2 cases by FISH. The HER2 status of our gastric cancer file is 17.2% by FISH, 20.4% by SISH. The concordance between HercepTest™/A0485 IHC and ISH is perfect in (+++) cases. Equivocal results (++) with any IHC method should be clarified by one of the molecular methods (SISH and FISH). Probably up to the higher level of heterogeneity of gastric carcinomas, there is a 4.5% dilemma of cases that are negative or weakly positive by conventional IHC methods. Therefore, regarding HER2 status in gastric carcinoma, the reliability of IHC methods should be checked.     

Detection of HER2 amplification in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma tissue with digital PCR using two TFF3 sequences as internal reference

Purpose

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a highly accurate method to determine DNA concentration and detect copy number variations. We developed an approach to assess HER2 gene amplification status using ddPCR with two sequences of TFF3 as reference probes.

细胞中同时检测特定标志物蛋白和基因表达方法的建立

目的在同一细胞中通过免疫组化和荧光原位杂交联合检测特定标志物的蛋白和基因水平。方法采用人乳腺癌细胞系JIMT-1作为研究对象,分别采用免疫荧光(IF)和免疫组织化学(IHC)检测JIMT-1细胞中HER2表达情况,并比对两种方法得到的HER2蛋白细胞定位和表达水平是否相同;在JIMT-1细胞中分别采用IF和荧光原位杂交法(FISH)以及两者联合检测法检测HER2蛋白和基因表达水平;在JIMT-1细胞中对HER2、Pan-CK、Ki67蛋白和基因水平进行联合检测。结果JIMT-1细胞中IF和IHC检测HER2蛋白水平和细胞定位相同;IF和FISH单独检测HER2蛋白和基因表达与两种方法联合使用的检测结果一致,IF和FISH联合检测不会影响HER2蛋白的细胞定位和表达水平的判读,同时对于HER2基因拷贝数判读无影响;通过对不同细胞定位的标志物检测,发现细胞膜、细胞浆和细胞核蛋白标志物均可联合FISH检测,并且不会影响标志物蛋白表达和定位的判读以及基因拷贝数的判读。结论采用IF和FISH联合检测可以在同一细胞中对特定标志物蛋白和基因水平同时检测。     

Comparison of MammaPrint and TargetPrint results with clinical parameters in German patients with early stage breast cancer

The 70-gene expression profile MammaPrint is a powerful prognostic indicator for disease outcome in breast cancer patients with improved prediction of recurrence risk compared to currently used guidelines. The microarray-based test TargetPrint further provides reliable, quantitative assessment of mRNA expression levels of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). This study was performed as a validation of MammaPrint and TargetPrint in an unselected German breast cancer population and was designed to determine the degree of concordance with currently applied clinical parameters. One hundred and forty cases of breast cancer stage I and II were classified as being low or high risk for distant metastasis using MammaPrint. Results were compared to current clinical risk classifications and adjuvant treatment management. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)/chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assessments of ER, PR and HER2 were further compared with gene expression read-outs using TargetPrint. Thirty-two percent of patients (19/59) with a poor prognosis-signature identified via MammaPrint did not receive adjuvant systemic treatment apart from endocrine therapy and were potentially undertreated; whereas 42% (35/77) of patients with a good prognosis-signature received chemotherapy and were potentially overtreated. Comparison of microarray receptor results with IHC and FISH/CISH were concordant in 97% for ER; 86% for PR; and 94% for HER2. In this German study population, MammaPrint would have resulted in altered treatment advice for adjuvant systemic therapy in 40% of patients. Furthermore, TargetPrint presented high concordance for ER, PR and Her2 with IHC and FISH/CISH analysis.     

Determination of HER2 gene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) in archival breast carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH(TM)) with fluorescence in situ (FISH) hybridization and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in determination of the HER2 status in human breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HER2 gene amplification was determined on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections of 62 invasive breast cancers by FISH and followed by CISH using a digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled HER2 DNA probe generated by Subtraction Probe Technology (SPT(TM)), and a biotin-labeled chromosome 17 centromeric (chr.17cen) probe. The sections were heat treated and enzyme digested. After in situ hybridization, the HER2 probe was detected with fluorescein (FITC)-anti-DIG for FISH, followed by peroxidase-anti-FITC and diaminobenzidine (DAB) for CISH. The chr.17cen probe was detected with peroxidase-streptavidin and DAB. For CISH application, HER2 gene copies or chromosome 17 centromeres and morphology of cells were easily visualized simultaneously with a 40x objective under bright-field microscope in hematoxylin-counterstained sections. IHC study of HER2 overexpression was performed on adjacent sections using a panel of three HER2 antibodies (TAB 250, CB11, A0485), and staining was scored according to the criteria specified in the HercepTest. RESULTS: HER2 gene amplification detected by CISH was visualized typically as large DAB-stained clusters or by many dots in the nucleus. FISH and CISH identified HER2 gene amplification in 19% of the tumors. Chromosome 17 polysomy was detected in 31% of the tumors. HER2 overexpression was demonstrated in 19% (TAB 250), 23% (CB11), and 36% (A0485) of the tumors. Complete concordance between the results of CISH with FISH, TAB 250, CB11, and A0485 was seen in 100%, 97%, 94%, and 84% of the cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: By permitting observation of morphology using a bright-field microscope, CISH is an accurate, practical, and economical approach to screen HER2 status in breast cancers. It is a useful methodology for confirming ambiguous IHC results.     

显色原位杂交和免疫组织化学检测乳腺癌HER2/neu基因状况和蛋白表达的对照性研究

目的探讨显色原位杂交（CISH）在检测乳腺癌中HER2／neu基因扩增上的作用。方法挑选乳腺浸润性导管癌患者组织石蜡蜡块（回顾性255例,前瞻性271例）,进行免疫组织化学（IHC）、CISH检测。15例回顾性标本送往德国HERA检测中心进行FISH检测。结果（1）回顾性病例中IHC阳性3＋者CISH基因扩增率为91．6％（120／131）,IHC2＋者CISH基因扩增率为56．5％（39／69）,IHC与CISH检测结果符合率为81．2％（207／255）,两者明显相关（P〈0．01）。（2）前瞻性病例中IHC蛋白过表达率31．7％．CISH基因扩增率27．3％。IHC3＋者CISH基因扩增率为91．4％（53／58）,IHC2＋者CISH基因扩增率为46．4％（13／28）,IHC与CISH检测结果符合率为89．7％（243／271）,两者明显相关（P〈0．01）。（3）经德国检测中心荧光原位杂交（FISH）检测的15例中14例和CISH结果完全一致,1例检测失败,而CISH为无扩增。（4）CISH检测基因扩增与雌激素受体（ER）、孕激素受体（PR）表达明显负相关（P值均〈0．01）。结论CISH检测HER2基因扩增结果与IHC检测蛋白过表达及FISH结果高度一致,CISH是检测HER2基因扩增的一项新技术。     

乳腺癌HER2基因遗传异质性与其临床病理特征的相关性研究

目的 介绍乳腺癌患者HER2基因扩增的瘤内遗传异质性(genetic heterogeneity,GH)现象,并探讨HER2基因GH与临床病理学参数间的相关性,寻找与HER2基因GH现象密切相关的病理学因素.方法 整理100例浸润性乳腺癌患者分期、组织学分型、分子分型等临床数据,应用免疫组化技术(immunohistochemistry,IHC)检测HER2、雌激素受体α(estrogen peceptor α,ERα)和孕激素受体(progesterone receptor,PR)蛋白表达,用荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)技术检测HER2基因扩增情况,并分析HER2基因异质性与临床病理参数间的关系.结果 100例乳腺癌患者中有20%的病例(20/100)存在HER2基因GH现象.在瘤内异质性样本中,扩增细胞所占比例≥25%的样本组其FISH结果阳性率明显高于扩增细胞＜25%的样本组(P=0.012).HER2蛋白的表达程度(P=0.004)和ER蛋白表达(P=0.002)与HER2基因GH现象显著相关.结论 HER2基因GH现象最易出现于HER2蛋白轻到中度表达、ER蛋白表达的乳腺癌组织,故而对于具有上述病理学特征的患者进行FISH检测时应特别注意GH现象,以免遗漏阳性细胞或者只计数阳性细胞,而给出不准确的FISH结果.     

Comprehensive analysis of HER2 expression and gene amplification in gastric cancers using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization: which scoring system should we use?

It has been reported that HER2 expression is different in gastric and breast cancers, and a gastric cancer scoring system (GCSS) has recently been suggested. We investigated HER2 protein expression using GCSS and a breast cancer scoring system (BCSS) and correlated it with HER2 gene amplification. HER2 status was evaluated in 1091 cases by analyzing tissue microarrays constructed using 2 different cores from each case. Polyclonal (HercepTest) and monoclonal (Pathway) antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry (IHC), and results were scored by BCSS and GCSS. Gene amplification was evaluated by automated dual-color silver-enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) in all cases and correlated with the results from fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 590 cases. The concordance between the IHC results using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies was high (κ = 0.785). The results of dual-color SISH and FISH showed very high concordance as well (κ = 0.918). GCSS was significantly more sensitive for detecting SISH positivity than was BCSS in both antibodies (polyclonal, P = .003; monoclonal, P < .001), but specificity was higher in BCSS than GCSS (polyclonal, P = .004; monoclonal, P < .001). It has been recently shown that HER2-overexpressing patients with unresectable gastric cancer benefited from trastuzumab therapy. Because IHC is recommended before gene amplification studies in HER2 testing, GCSS should be used for evaluating HER2 expression in gastric cancers.     

The assessment of HER2 status and its clinical implication in breast cancer

Amplification and overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer is associated with an adverse prognosis. The introduction of trastuzumab and lapatinib has substantially improved the clinical outcomes of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. The key element of the successful application of anti-HER2 therapies in real-world has been the selection of candidates for treatment based on the level of HER2 positivity of the tumor. HER2 status of breast cancer is clinically assessed by HER2 protein expression with immunohistochemistry (IHC) or HER2 gene amplification with in situ hybridization (ISH). The 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) HER2 guideline focused update revised the HER2 scoring criteria. Digital image analysis (DIA) has emerged as an objective and reproducible IHC scoring method and the ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline has acknowledged DIA as a diagnostic modality. In this article, we aim to review the assessment of HER2 status and its clinical application in breast cancer.