Rapid Molecular Microbiologic Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection

We previously showed that culture of samples obtained by prosthesis vortexing and sonication was more sensitive than tissue culture for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis. Despite improved sensitivity, culture-negative cases remained; furthermore, culture has a long turnaround time. We designed a genus-/group-specific rapid PCR assay panel targeting PJI bacteria and applied it to samples obtained by vortexing and sonicating explanted hip and knee prostheses, and we compared the results to those with sonicate fluid and periprosthetic tissue culture obtained at revision or resection arthroplasty. We studied 434 subjects with knee (n = 272) or hip (n = 162) prostheses; using a standardized definition, 144 had PJI. Sensitivities of tissue culture, of sonicate fluid culture, and of PCR were 70.1, 72.9, and 77.1%, respectively. Specificities were 97.9, 98.3, and 97.9%, respectively. Sonicate fluid PCR was more sensitive than tissue culture (P = 0.04). PCR of prosthesis sonication samples is more sensitive than tissue culture for the microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic hip and knee infection and provides same-day PJI diagnosis with definition of microbiology. The high assay specificity suggests that typical PJI bacteria may not cause aseptic implant failure.     

Evaluation of the use of sonication of retrieved implants for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection in a routine setting

In order to evaluate the usefulness of sonication of retrieved implants for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a large group of patients in a routine setting, we designed a 3-year retrospective study. Patients were classified into two groups: those meeting the clinical criteria of PJI and those that did not (control group). Two hundred patients and 276 samples were included. The types of infection were early (n?=?44), delayed (n?=?53), positive intraoperative cultures (n?=?13) and late-acute (n?=?8). The culture sensitivities of sonicate fluid, periprosthetic tissue, synovial fluid and combination of periprosthetic tissue and/or synovial fluid were 69.5, 52.8, 54.8 and 60.2%, respectively. The specificities were 97.6, 90.3, 93.0 and 89.9%, respectively. Sonicate fluid culture of implants was more sensitive than peri-implant tissue, synovial fluid and combination of periprosthetic tissue and/or synovial fluid for all infection types, though it was especially useful in delayed infection: 91.3% vs. 60.0% (p?=?0.0015), 63.2% (p?=?0.0005) and 66.7% (p?=?0.0001), respectively. When sonicate fluid culture of implants was performed in addition to conventional cultures, the sensitivity increased significantly in total (from 60.2 to 77.1%) and delayed PJI (from 45.1 to 71.7%). On the other hand, for early PJI, sonicate fluid culture of prosthesis was not superior to conventional diagnostic methods.     

Prosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis Using Broad-Range PCR of Biofilms Dislodged from Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Surfaces Using Sonication

Periprosthetic tissue and/or synovial fluid PCR has been previously studied for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis; however, few studies have assessed the utility of PCR on biofilms dislodged from the surface of explanted arthroplasties using vortexing and sonication (i.e., sonicate fluid PCR). We compared sonicate fluid 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR and sequencing to culture of synovial fluid, tissue, and sonicate fluid for the microbiologic diagnosis of PJI. PCR sequences generating mixed chromatograms were decatenated using RipSeq Mixed. We studied sonicate fluids from 135 and 231 subjects with PJI and aseptic failure, respectively. Synovial fluid, tissue, and sonicate fluid culture and sonicate fluid PCR had similar sensitivities (64.7, 70.4, 72.6, and 70.4%, respectively; P > 0.05) and specificities (96.9, 98.7, 98.3, and 97.8%, respectively; P > 0.05). Combining sonicate fluid culture and PCR, the sensitivity was higher (78.5%, P < 0.05) than those of individual tests, with similar specificity (97.0%). Thirteen subjects had positive sonicate fluid culture but negative PCR, and 11 had negative sonicate fluid culture but positive PCR (among which 7 had prior use of antimicrobials). Broad-range PCR and culture of sonicate fluid have equivalent performance for PJI diagnosis.     

Sonication of Explanted Prosthesis Combined with Incubation in BD Bactec Bottles for Pathogen-Based Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare but refractory complication of arthroplasty. Accurate identification of pathogens is a key step for successful treatment of PJI, which remains a challenge for clinicians and laboratory workers. We designed a combined culture method with sonication of implants and incubation in a BD Bactec system to improve the effectiveness of pathogen diagnosis in PJI. The aims of this study were to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of sonicate fluid cultures in the BD Bactec system and to compare the results with those of synovial fluid cultures in the BD Bactec system. The prosthetic components removed were sonicated in Ringer''s solution, and then sonicate fluid was incubated in Bactec bottles for 5 days. Synovial fluid was incubated in Bactec bottles for 5 days as a control. Synovial fluid cultures with Bactec bottles and sonicate fluid cultures with Bactec bottles showed sensitivities of 64% and 88%, respectively (P = 0.009), with specificities of 98% and 87% (P = 0.032), respectively. Sonicate fluid cultures with Bactec bottles were more sensitive than synovial fluid cultures with Bactec bottles regardless of whether antimicrobial agents were used within 14 days before surgery (81% versus 52%; P = 0.031) or not (93% versus 72%; P = 0.031). Sonication of explanted prostheses followed by incubation of the resulting sonicate fluid in Bactec bottles detected many more pathogens than did synovial fluid cultures with Bactec bottles. This method is also effective in cases with antibiotic treatment before surgery.     

Improved Diagnosis of Infection Associated with Osteosynthesis by Use of Sonication of Fracture Fixation Implants

Previous studies have shown that sonication fluid cultures from removed orthopedic devices improved the microbiological diagnosis of orthopedic implant-associated infections; however, few of these investigations have applied sonication to the removed fracture fixation devices to evaluate its utility for the diagnosis of osteosynthesis-associated infection (OAI). We compared sonication fluid to conventional tissue cultures from 180 subjects with different sizes of plates and screws (n = 156), spinal implants (n = 26), and intramedullary nails (n = 3), of whom 125 and 55 subjects had OAI and noninfected osteosynthesis (NIO), respectively. The sensitivity for detecting OAI was 90.4% for sonication fluid culture and 56.8% for periprosthetic tissue cultures (P < 0.05), and the specificities were 90.9% and 96.4%, respectively. Sonication fluid culture detected more pathogens than peri-implant tissue culture (113 versus 71; P < 0.001), while polymicrobial infections were diagnosed by sonication fluid cultures and tissue cultures in 20.8% and 8% (P < 0.001), respectively. Microbiological diagnosis was achieved exclusively by sonication fluid cultures for 47 (90.4%) subjects, and among them, 18 (38.3%) had previously received antibiotics, whereas in five (9.6%) infected subjects, tissue culture was positive and the sonication fluid culture was negative. Among 39 (31.2%) OAI cases receiving antibiotics, the identification of the organisms occurred in 38.5% and 82.1% of the tissue and sonication fluid cultures, respectively (P < 0.049). We demonstrated that sonication fluid culture from removed osteosyntheses has the potential for improving the microbiological diagnosis of OAI.     

The impact of preoperative bacteriuria on the risk of periprosthetic joint infection after primary knee or hip replacement: a retrospective study with a 1-year follow up

ObjectivesPatients who undergo elective joint replacement are traditionally screened and treated for preoperative bacteriuria to prevent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). More recently, this practice has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative bacteriuria is associated with an increased risk of PJI.MethodsPatients who had undergone a primary hip or knee replacement in a tertiary care hospital between September 2002 and December 2013 were identified from the hospital database (23 171 joint replacements, 10 200 hips, and 12 971 knees). The results of urine cultures taken within 90 days before the operation were obtained. Patients with subsequent PJI or superficial wound infection in a 1-year follow-up period were identified based on prospective infection surveillance. The association between bacteriuria and PJI was examined using a multivariable logistic regression model that included information on the operated joint, age, gender and the patients' chronic diseases.ResultsThe incidence of PJI was 0.68% (n = 158). Preoperative bacteriuria was not associated with an increased risk of PJI either in the univariate (0.51% versus 0.71%, OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.34–1.54) or in the multivariable (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.38–1.77) analysis. There were no cases where PJI was caused by a pathogen identified in the preoperative urine culture. Results were similar for superficial infections.ConclusionsThere was no association between preoperative bacteriuria and postoperative surgical site infection. Based on these results, it seems that the preoperative screening and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria is not required.     

The application of sonication in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a catastrophic complication after total joint arthroplasty. It has always been difficult to diagnose PJI, which is characterised by existence of biofilm around the implants. The application of sonication has proven advantageous for pathogen detection. This meta-analysis of clinical trials was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of sonication and to compare it with traditional bacterial culture. We assessed 16 studies that evaluated sonication fluid cultures (SFC) for the diagnosis of PJI. It was shown that sonication may be of great value in PJI diagnosis, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.79 (95 % confidence interval [CI]?=?0.76–0.81), specificity of 0.95 (CI?=?0.94–0.96), DOR of 71.20 (CI?=?31.08–163.10), PLR of 15.25 (CI?=?6.44–36.15), and NLR of 0.23 (CI?=?0.18–0.30). The AUC value of the SROC was 0.90. The results of this meta-analysis showed that culture of fluid after sonication was of great value for PJI diagnosis. Sonication was more sensitive than traditional tissue culture with lower specificity, especially for patients previously taking antibiotics.     

Origin and characteristics of haematogenous periprosthetic joint infection

ObjectivesRecognition of infectious origin of haematogenous periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) is crucial. We investigated the primary focus and characteristics of haematogenous PJI.MethodsConsecutive patients who presented with haematogenous PJI between 01/2010 and 01/2018 were retrospectively analysed. Haematogenous PJI was defined by diagnosis of infection ≥1 month after surgery, acute manifestation after a pain-free period and positive blood or prosthetic-site culture and/or evidence of distant infectious focus consistent with the pathogen. Fisher's exact, Student's t and Mann–Whitney U tests were used, as appropriate.ResultsA total of 106 episodes of PJI were included, involving 59 knee, 45 hip, one shoulder and one elbow prostheses. The median time from last surgery until haematogenous PJI was 47 months (range, 1–417 months). The pathogen was identified in 105 episodes (99%), including Staphylococcus aureus (n = 43), streptococci (n = 32), enterococci (n = 13), Gram-negative bacteria (n = 9) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 8). Gram-negative bacteria were significantly more often found in hip joints than in knee joints. Blood cultures grew the pathogen in 43 of 70 episodes (61%). The primary infectious focus was identified in 72 episodes (68%) and included infections of intravascular devices or heart valves (22 episodes), skin and soft tissue (16 episodes), the oral cavity (12 episodes), urogenital (12 episodes) or gastrointestinal tract (seven episodes) and other sites (three episodes).ConclusionsIn acute PJI manifesting after a pain-free period, the haematogenous infection route should be considered and the primary infectious focus should be actively searched for. The cardiovascular system, skin and soft tissue, oral cavity, urogenital and gastrointestinal tracts were common origins of haematogenous PJI.     

Sonication of Explanted Cardiac Implants Improves Microbial Detection in Cardiac Device Infections

The sonication technique has been shown to be a promising tool for microbiological diagnosis of device-related infections. We evaluated the usefulness of the sonication method for pathogen detection in 80 explanted cardiac components collected from 40 patients, and the results were compared with those of conventional cultures. Forty subjects undergoing cardiac device removal were studied: 20 had cardiac device infection, and 20 subjects underwent elective generator replacement or revision in the absence of infection. Sonication of explanted devices was more sensitive than traditional culture for microbial detection (67% and 50%, respectively; P = 0.0005). The bacterial count detected in sonication fluid culture was significantly higher than that detected in traditional culture in both infected (P = 0.019) and uninfected (P = 0.029) devices. In the infected patients, sonication fluid culture yielded a significantly higher rate of pathogen detection in explanted electrodes than traditional culture (65% versus 45%; P = 0.02), while no differences were found in the generators. Ten strains were detected only through sonication fluid culture: 6 Staphylococcus epidermidis strains, 1 Staphylococcus hominis strain, 2 Corynebacterium striatum strains, and 1 Brevundimonas sp. Neither the type nor the duration of antimicrobial therapy before device removal had an effect on the diagnostic performance of sonication fluid culture (P = 0.75 and P = 0.56, respectively). In the patients without infection, sonication fluid culture was positive in 8 cases (40%), whereas conventional culture was positive in only 4 (20%). In summary, the sonication technique improves the microbiological diagnosis of explanted cardiac devices.     

Experimental reproduction of periprosthetic joint infection: Developing a representative animal model

BackgroundInfection after arthroplasty (prosthetic joint infection; PJI) is a devastating complication that can lead to functional loss of the affected limb. The purpose of the present study is to develop an animal model of PJI using a three-dimensional printed species-specific implant, which is a step forward for future research to develop new therapeutic strategies.MethodsFifteen New Zealand White rabbits were employed to reproduce PJI by intra-articular inoculation of 10⁵ cfu/ml of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC® 29213. Three-dimensional printing technology was used to design a species-specific four-millimeter-thick implant maintaining the anatomical irregularities of the tibial-articular surface. Response to bacterial inoculation was monitored by clinical (weight and temperature), hematological (leukocyte, lymphocyte and platelet counts) and biochemical (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) analyses at the time of inoculation and seven days thereafter, when microbiological samples for culture were also taken.ResultsAll animals recovered from surgery and all displayed full weight-bearing four days postoperatively. Fourteen of the 15 tested animals (93.3%) presented positive microbiological cultures. A statistically significant increase was found in the number of platelets and leukocytes, as well as a significant decrease in the percentage of lymphocytes, with P = 0.0001 in all cases.ConclusionsAn experimental model faithfully reproducing the periprosthetic infection environment and achieving a high rate of infection has been designed. The use of three-dimensional printed species-specific implants allows rapid postoperative recovery of animals and the development of a stable biofilm. These characteristics make it an interesting model to study its pathogenesis and possible therapeutic strategies.     

Periprosthetic knee infection reconstruction with a hinged prosthesis: Implant survival and risk factors for treatment failure

BackgroundSevere bone and soft tissue defects are common after failed two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). There is a paucity of evidence on the outcomes of using a hinged prosthesis for knee PJI reconstruction during second-stage re-implantation, especially regarding implant survivorship, reinfection risk factors, and functionality after successful reconstruction.MethodsA total of 58 knee PJI patients with Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) type II/III defect and soft tissue insufficiency underwent reconstruction with hinged prosthesis. Enrolled patients adhered to a two-stage exchange arthroplasty protocol and were evaluated for a mean follow up of 65.1 months. Kaplan–Meier analysis was conducted for implant survivorship and infection-free survival. Multivariate analysis was used to determine independent risk factors for recurrent infections. Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to evaluate functional outcomes.ResultsThe survivorship of hinged prosthesis was 86.2% at 2 years and 70.2% at 5 years. Infection-free analysis revealed an estimation of 68.9% at 2 years and 60.6% at 5 years. Of the 58 patients, 13 (22.4%) developed recurrent PJI, three (5.2%) aseptic loosening, and one (1.7%) periprosthetic fracture. Multivariate analysis revealed that obesity (hazard ratio (HR), 3.11), high-virulent pathogen (HR, 3.44), and polymicrobial infection (HR, 3.59) were independent risk factors for reinfection. Patients showed a mean improvement of 32.8 ± 7.7 in Knee Society Clinical Score (KSCS) and 30.8 ± 11.0 in Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) after successful reconstruction (P < 0.001).ConclusionsUsing hinged knee prosthesis for PJI reconstruction provided an overall implant survival of 70.2% and an infection-free survival of 60.6% at mid-term follow up. Obesity, virulent pathogens, and polymicrobial infections were independent risk factors for infection recurrence.     

Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection by Use of PCR-Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

We compared PCR-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (PCR-ESI/MS) to culture using sonicate fluid from 431 subjects with explanted knee (n = 270) or hip (n = 161) prostheses. Of these, 152 and 279 subjects had prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic failure, respectively. The sensitivities for detecting PJI were 77.6% for PCR-ESI/MS and 69.7% for culture (P = 0.0105). The specificities were 93.5 and 99.3%, respectively (P = 0.0002).     

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with lower proportions of surgical site infection compared with total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective nationwide database study

BackgroundThis study aimed to clarify the association between types of knee arthroplasty (KA) (total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or unicompatmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)) and surgical site infection (SSI) with adjustment for various factors, using a Japanese national database.MethodsData on 181,608 patients who underwent unilateral primary KA for osteoarthritis from 2010 to 2017 were obtained from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. SSI was identified based on International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. Deep SSI (i.e. periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)) was identified as SSI treated with surgical procedures. Multivariable logistic regression analyses for SSI and PJI were performed, in which dependent variables included types of KA, patient backgrounds (sex, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, comorbidities), and seasonality.ResultsEight percent of analyzed patients underwent UKA, while 92% underwent TKA. The proportions of SSI and PJI after UKA were 0.9% and 0.3%, respectively, both of which were lower than those after TKA (1.9% and 0.6%) (P < 0.001). Multivariable analyses showed lower proportions of SSI for UKA (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.37–0.60; P < 0.001) and PJI (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.34–0.65; P < 0.001) than TKA. Other factors associated with both SSI and PJI included male sex, BMI >30 kg/m², renal dysfunction and summer season.ConclusionUKA was associated with lower proportions of SSI and PJI than TKA. Surgeons should carefully consider the indication of UKA before performing TKA, especially in patients with knee unicompartmental osteoarthritis who are at a high risk for SSI or PJI.     

Microbiologic Diagnosis of Prosthetic Shoulder Infection by Use of Implant Sonication

We recently described a sonication technique for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee and hip infections. We compared periprosthetic tissue culture to implant sonication followed by sonicate fluid culture for the diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection. One hundred thirty-six patients undergoing arthroplasty revision or resection were studied; 33 had definite prosthetic shoulder infections and 2 had probable prosthetic shoulder infections. Sonicate fluid culture was more sensitive than periprosthetic tissue culture for the detection of definite prosthetic shoulder infection (66.7 and 54.5%, respectively; P = 0.046). The specificities were similar (98.0% and 95.1%, respectively; P = 0.26). Propionibacterium acnes was the commonest species detected among culture-positive definite prosthetic shoulder infection cases by periprosthetic tissue culture (38.9%) and sonicate fluid culture (40.9%). All subjects from whom P. acnes was isolated from sonicate fluid were male. We conclude that sonicate fluid culture is useful for the diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection.The frequency of shoulder replacement surgery is increasing (1). The incidence of prosthetic shoulder infection varies from 0.4 to 15.4% (6, 7). When an infection is present, the infection requires unique medical and surgical management, rendering an accurate diagnosis critical. However, since patients with prosthetic shoulder infection often present with stiffness and/or pain alone (7), the achievement of an accurate diagnosis is challenging.Periprosthetic tissue has been the specimen cultured for the microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection. Specificity is an issue, as microorganisms (e.g., Propionibacterium and Staphylococcus spp.) can be contaminants, and the number of microorganisms in tissue is small. As a result, it has been suggested that multiple samples be obtained; for prosthetic hips and knees, it is recommended that five or six periprosthetic tissue specimens be cultured (2). No such data are available for shoulder implants.We recently clinically validated a sonication technique that is used to sample biofilm bacteria on the surface of removed hip and knee implants placed in solid containers. We demonstrated that the culture of samples obtained by sonication of the implant was more sensitive than the culture of periprosthetic tissue for the diagnosis of prosthetic hip and knee infections (22). The poor sensitivity of the latter likely relates to the presence of bacteria in biofilms on the prosthesis surface, a site not well sampled when periprosthetic tissue samples for culture are obtained. No data on the accuracy of sonication for the diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection are available.The proportion of patients with shoulder infections due to Propionibacterium acnes is significantly greater than the proportion of patients with lower limb infections due to P. acnes (12). Sperling et al. reported that Propionibacterium spp. account for 16% of prosthetic shoulder infections (16). Franta et al. reported that among 31/282 patients (11%) with unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties, positive intraoperative cultures were found in 23 at the time of revision surgery, with the most common organisms isolated being coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp., followed by P. acnes (11). Cheung et al. reported the results of reimplantation of glenoid components following removal and allogeneic bone grafting in seven patients; specimens from two patients demonstrated the growth of P. acnes (5). These two patients had continuing pain and radiographic evidence of glenoid component loosening and subsequently underwent repeat revision surgery, whereas the remaining patients did well and did not require repeat revision surgery (5), suggesting a role for P. acnes in pain and component loosening. Accordingly, the accurate detection of a Propionibacterium spp. is paramount in the diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection.The purpose of the present study was to compare implant sonication to periprosthetic tissue culture for the diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection. We also evaluated immunofluorescence microscopy and PCR analysis of sonicate fluid to detect prosthetic shoulder infection caused by the two most frequently associated microorganisms. Finally, we compared patient characteristics associated with Propionibacterium prosthetic shoulder infection versus those associated with non-Propionibacterium prosthetic shoulder infection.(This work was presented in part at the 16th Annual European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, April 2006, Nice, France, and the 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2007, Chicago, IL.)     

The effect of preoperative oral antibiotic use on the risk of periprosthetic joint infection after primary knee or hip replacement: a retrospective study with a 1-year follow-up

ObjectivesAntibiotics are used for various reasons before elective joint replacement surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate patients' use of oral antibiotics before joint replacement surgery and how this affects the risk for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).MethodsPatients having a primary hip or knee replacement in a tertiary care hospital between September 2002 and December 2013 were identified (n = 23 171). Information on oral antibiotic courses purchased 90 days preoperatively and patients' chronic diseases was gathered. Patients with a PJI in a 1-year follow-up period were identified. The association between antibiotic use and PJI was examined using a multivariable logistic regression model and propensity score matching.ResultsOne hundred and fifty-eight (0.68%) cases of PJI were identified. In total, 4106 (18%) joint replacement operations were preceded by at least one course of antibiotics. The incidence of PJI for patients with preoperative use of oral antibiotics was 0.29% (12/4106), whereas for patients without antibiotic use it was 0.77% (146/19 065). A preoperative antibiotic course was associated with a reduced risk for subsequent PJI in the multivariable model (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22–0.73). Similar results were found in the propensity score matched material (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18–0.65).ConclusionsThe use of oral antibiotics before elective joint replacement surgery is common and has a potential effect on the subsequent risk for PJI. Nevertheless, indiscriminate use of antibiotics before elective joint replacement surgery cannot be recommended, even though treatment of active infections remains an important way to prevent surgical site infections.     

Effects of intra-articular D-amino acids combined with systemic vancomycin on an experimental Staphylococcus aureus-induced periprosthetic joint infection

BackgroundThe D-isoforms of amino acids (D-AAs) exhibit anti-biofilm potential against a diverse range of bacterial species in vitro, while its role in vivo remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a combination of D-AAs and vancomycin on a PJI rat model.MethodsEight-week-old male SD rats were randomized to the control group, sham group, vancomycin group, D-AAs–vancomycin group. After treatment for 6 weeks, we analysed the levels of inflammatory factors in serum, behavioural change, imaging manifestations. The anti-biofilm ability of D-AAs was detected by crystal violet staining and scanning electron microscope observation, and its ability to assist antibiotics in killing bacteria was assessed by culture of bacteria. Additionally, micro-CT and histological analysis were used to evaluate the impact of D-AAs combined with vancomycin on the bone remodelling around the prosthesis.ResultsThe group treated with a D-AAs–vancomycin combination sustained normal weight gain and exhibited reduced the serum levels of α2M, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α and PGE2. Moreover, treated with D-AAs in combination with vancomycin improved the weight-bearing activity performance, increased the sizes and widths of distal femurs, and improved Rissing scale scoring. In particular, treatment using D-AAs enhanced the ability of vancomycin to eradicate Staphylococcus aureus, as demonstrated by the dispersion of existing biofilms and the inhibition of biofilm formation that occurred in a concentration-dependent manner. This treatment combination also resulted in a reduction in bacterial burden with in the soft tissues, bones, and implants. Furthermore, D-AAs–vancomycin combination treatment attenuated abnormal bone remodelling around the implant, as evidenced by an observed increase in BMD, BV/TV, and Tb.Th and the presence of reduced Trap⁺ osteoclasts and elevated osterix⁺ osteo-progenitors.ConclusionsCombining D-AAs with vancomycin provides an effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of PJI by promoting biofilm dispersion to enhance antimicrobial activity.     

Avoidance of intramedullary violation in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty lowers the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: A propensity score matching analysis of 5342 cases

BackgroundConventional total knee arthroplasty (CONV-TKA) inevitably perturbs femoral medullary canal, disturbs medullary micro-architecture and increases blood loss and inflammatory responses. We hypothesized that avoidance of intramedullary violation may lower the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this study was to verify whether computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (CAS-TKA) lowers the incidence of PJI as compared with CONV-TKA.MethodsA propensity score matching study of 5342 patients who underwent CAS-TKA (n = 1085) or CONV-TKA (n = 4257) for primary osteoarthritis of the knee from 2007 to 2015 in our institute was performed. Patients who underwent CAS-TKA were matched to those who received CONV-TKA at a 1:2 ratio according to demographics and comorbidities. PJI was defined according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society diagnostic criteria from the 2013 International Consensus Meeting.ResultsAfter controlling potential risk factors, the use of CAS-TKA resulted in a lower incidence of PJI as compared with CONV-TKA [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.18–0.99]. The same trend in PJI reduction was observed with the usage of CAS-TKA under sensitivity testing [HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12–0.95]. The cumulative incidence of PJI was lower in the CAS-TKA group than the CONV-TKA group (log-rank test, p = 0.013).ConclusionAvoidance of intramedullary violation during TKA may play a pivotal role in lowering the incidence of PJI. The use of CAS-TKA can reduce the incidence of PJI, with a better survival rate in terms of being free of PJI, as compared with CONV-TKA.Level of evidence III.     

Microbiology of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections: a database study

ObjectivesKnowledge of the microbiological aetiology of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is essential to its management. Contemporary literature from the United States on this topic is lacking. This study aimed to identify the most common microorganisms associated with types of arthroplasty, the timing of infection, and clues to polymicrobial infection.MethodsWe performed an analytical cross-sectional study of patients 18 years of age or older with hip or knee PJI diagnosed at our institution between 2010 and 2019. PJI was defined using the criteria adapted from those of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Cases included PJI associated with primary or revision arthroplasty and arthroplasty performed at our institution or elsewhere.ResultsA total of 2067 episodes of PJI in 1651 patients were included. Monomicrobial infections represented 70% of episodes (n = 1448), with 25% being polymicrobial (n = 508) and the rest (5%, n = 111) culture-negative. The most common group causing PJI was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species (other than S. ludgunensis) (37%, n = 761). The distribution of most common organisms was similar regardless of arthroplasty type. The S. aureus complex, Gram-negative bacteria, and anaerobic bacteria (other than Cutibacterium species) were more likely to be isolated than other organisms in the first year following index arthroplasty (OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.4–2.2; OR 1.5, 95%CI 1.1–2.0; and OR 1.5, 95%CI 1.0–2.2, respectively). The proportion of culture-negative PJIs was higher in primary than revision arthroplasty (6.5% versus 3%, p 0.0005). The presence of a sinus tract increased the probability of the isolation of more than one microorganism by almost three-fold (OR 2.6, 95%CI 2.0–3.3).ConclusionsJoint age, presence of a sinus tract, and revision arthroplasties influenced PJI microbiology.     

Sonication of Antibiotic Loaded Cement Spacers: A Valuable Technique for Detection of Infection Persistence in Two-stage Revision for Infected Joint Arthroplasty

We evaluated the diagnostic utility of sonication of antibiotic loaded cement spacers comparing with periprosthetic tissue cultures for the detection of persisting infection in 14 patients undergoing staged procedures. Sonication improved microbial detection of intraoperative cultures from 14.2% to 28.5% (P = 0.481). Routine sonication of spacers is recommended.     

Nanopore 16S amplicon sequencing enables rapid detection of pathogen in knee periprosthetic joint infection

ObjectivesWe investigated whether nanopore 16S amplicon sequencing is capable of bacterial identification in patients with knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and we compared its efficacy with conventional culture studies.MethodsIn total, 36 patients who had clinical manifestation suspected of PJI were enrolled in this study. To begin, synovial fluids were aspirated from the affected knee using aseptic technique and tissues specimens were obtained during the surgery. Next, DNA was extracted from the synovial fluid or tissues, and 16S rDNA PCR was performed. In PCR positive cases, nanopore amplicon sequencing was then performed for up to 3 h. The results of amplicon sequencing were compared to those of conventional culture studies.ResultsOf the 36 patients enrolled, 22 were classified as true infections according to the MSIS criteria whereas 14 were considered uninfected. Among the 22 PJI cases, 19 cases were culture positive (CP-PJI) while three cases were culture negative (CN-PJI). In 14 of 19 (73.7 %) CP- PJI cases, 16S sequencing identified concordant bacteria with conventional culture studies with a significantly shorter turnaround time. In some cases, nanopore 16S sequencing was superior to culture studies in the species-level identification of pathogen and detection of polymicrobial infections. Altogether, in the majority of PJI candidate patients (32 of 36, 88.9 %), 16S sequencing achieved identical results to cultures studies with a significantly reduced turnaround time (100.9 ± 32.5 h vs. 10.8 ± 7.7 h, p < 0.001).ConclusionsNanopore 16S sequencing was found to be particularly useful for pathogen identification in knee PJI. Although the sensitivity was not superior to culture studies, the nanopore 16S sequencing was much faster, and species-level identification and detection of polymicrobial infections were superior to culture studies.