Cytogenetic and molecular aberrations in endometrial stromal tumors

Endometrial stromal tumors (ESTs) are rare uterine mesenchymal tumors, comprising <10% of all uterine mesenchymal neoplasms. The latest World Health Organization classification divides endometrial stromal tumors into 3 categories based on morphologic features: endometrial stromal nodule (ESN), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma. Specific cytogenetic aberrations and molecular genetic alterations have recently been identified in endometrial stromal tumors, providing insights into their molecular biology, potential diagnostic markers, and possible therapeutic targets. Currently, recurrent chromosomal rearrangements resulting in gene fusion play a substantive role in the pathogenesis of endometrial stromal nodules, endometrial stromal sarcomas, and a small subset of undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas. Loss of heterozygosity of tumor suppressor genes and deregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway have also been implicated in EST tumorigenesis. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in the molecular pathology of endometrial stromal tumors.     

Expanding the spectrum of GLI1-altered mesenchymal tumors—A high-grade uterine sarcoma harboring a novel PAMR1::GLI1 fusion and literature review of GLI1-altered mesenchymal neoplasms of the gynecologic tract

GLI1-altered mesenchymal tumors comprise a group of seemingly unrelated entities, including pericytoma with t(7;12) translocation, plexiform fibromyxoma, gastroblastoma, malignant epithelioid neoplasm with GLI1 rearrangements, and GLI1-amplified mesenchymal neoplasms. Herein, we report a high-grade uterine sarcoma harboring a novel PAMR1::GLI1 fusion and present a literature review of GLI1-altered mesenchymal neoplasms of the gynecologic tract. A 57-year-old female presented with an abdomino-pelvic mass, felt since a decade prior. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a heterogenous myometrial mass extending beyond the serosa. The patient underwent oncologic surgical resection. Gross examination revealed a perforated multi-nodular uterine tumor (21 cm) with a firm white and soft fleshy cut surface, featuring hemorrhage and necrosis. The tumor was morphologically heterogenous, disclosing frankly sarcomatous areas composed of pleomorphic spindle and focally epithelioid cells, intermingled with a component of low-grade spindle cells arranged in fascicles. There was a rich vascular network and zones of necrosis with peripheral amianthoid-like collagen plaques. Lymphovascular invasion and metastasis to lymph nodes and omentum were present. The tumor was immunopositive for CD10 and cyclinD1, and negative for cytokeratins, myogenic, melanotic, and hormonal markers. ArcherTM Fusion Sarcoma Assay detected PAMR1(exon1)::GLI1(exon4) fusion, confirmed on RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing. The patient received chemo-radiotherapy, however, developed metastatic recurrence and demised 18 months post-surgery. Altogether, this is a rare and diagnostically challenging case of a uterine sarcoma harboring a novel GLI1 fusion. Emerging GLI/Hedgehog inhibitors provide clinical relevance to recognizing these tumors in modern pathology.     

Uterine sarcomas

A wide variety of sarcomas occur in the uterus but two subtypes - leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma - account for a majority of those more routinely encountered. Using the 2003 World Health Organization classification, this review focuses on six uterine sarcomas: endometrial stromal sarcoma, undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, rhabomyosarcoma, angiosarcoma and liposarcoma. The epidemiological, clinical, pathological and molecular features are presented along with therapeutic approaches. Familiarity with molecular aspects of these tumors and application of novel technologies in their assessment should be encouraged as they may provide alternate therapies resulting in improved survival for the patient. Clinical information necessary for accurate diagnosis of these lesions is emphasised. A multidisciplinary approach to management of patients with uterine sarcomas is essential for optimal management.     

Synovial sarcoma: defining features and diagnostic evolution

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a malignant mesenchymal neoplasm with variable epithelial differentiation, with a propensity to occur in young adults and which can arise at almost any site. It is generally viewed and treated as a high-grade sarcoma. As one of the first sarcomas to be defined by the presence of a specific chromosomal translocation leading to the production of the SS18-SSX fusion oncogene, it is perhaps the archetypal “translocation-associated sarcoma,” and its translocation remains unique to this tumor type. Synovial sarcoma has a variety of morphologic patterns, but its chief forms are the classic biphasic pattern, of glandular or solid epithelial structures with monomorphic spindle cells and the monophasic pattern, of fascicles of spindle cells with only immunohistochemical or ultrastructural evidence of epithelial differentiation. However, there is significant morphologic heterogeneity and overlap with a variety of other neoplasms, which can cause diagnostic challenge, particularly as the immunoprofile is varied, SS18-SSX is not detected in 100% of SSs, and they may occur at unusual sites. Correct diagnosis is clinically important, due to the relative chemosensitivity of SS in relation to other sarcomas, for prognostication and because of the potential for treatment with specific targeted therapies in the near future. We review SS, with emphasis on the diagnostic spectrum, recent immunohistochemical and genetic findings, and the differential diagnosis.     

Cutaneous neoplasms of uncertain differentiation

Tumours of uncertain differentiation represent a markedly heterogeneous group of neoplasms that show no identifiable line of differentiation by currently available technologies, and do not resemble any specific normal cells or tissues. Continuing advances in molecular genetics have significantly aided to our understanding of these tumours, enabling refinements in classification and better insights into their biology, and furthering the development of ancillary immunohistochemical and molecular diagnostic tests and targeted therapies in the clinical setting. This review summarizes key genetic, morphologic and immunohistochemical features for a selection of cutaneous neoplasms of uncertain differentiation, with emphasis on new entities and developments in the diagnostic setting.     

Gene fusions in superficial mesenchymal neoplasms: Emerging entities and useful diagnostic adjuncts

Cutaneous mesenchymal neoplasms are diagnostically challenging because of their overlapping morphology, and, often, the limited tissue in skin biopsy specimens. Molecular and cytogenetic techniques have identified characteristic gene fusions in many of these tumor types, findings that have expanded our understanding of disease pathogenesis and motivated development of useful ancillary diagnostic tools. Here, we provide an update of new findings in tumor types that can occur in the skin and superficial subcutis, including dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, benign fibrous histiocytoma, epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma, angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma, glomus tumor, myopericytoma/myofibroma, non-neural granular cell tumor, CIC-rearranged sarcoma, hybrid schwannoma/perineurioma, and clear cell sarcoma. We also discuss recently described and emerging tumor types that can occur in superficial locations and that harbor gene fusions, including nested glomoid neoplasm with GLI1 alterations, clear cell tumor with melanocytic differentiation and ACTIN::MITF translocation, melanocytic tumor with CRTC1::TRIM11 fusion, EWSR1::SMAD3-rearranged fibroblastic tumor, PLAG1-rearranged fibroblastic tumor, and superficial ALK-rearranged myxoid spindle cell neoplasm. When possible, we discuss how fusion events mediate the pathogenesis of these tumor types, and we also discuss the related diagnostic and therapeutic implications of these events.     

Chronische myeloische Neoplasien

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and related chronic disorders constitute a subgroup of myeloid malignancies which are defined according to clinical, morphological and molecular features by the actual World Health Organization classification of tumors of the haematopietic system. Screening procedures for a BCR-ABL fusion gene, JAK2, thrombopoietin receptor and KIT mutations are formally included in the diagnostic approach. Myelodysplastic/MPN overlap syndromes include rare entities such as refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts characterized by a high proportion of JAK2V617F mutated cases. The paradigm of targeted treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib has now been extended to eosinophilia-associated myeloid neoplasms with PDGFRA, PDGFRB or FGFR1 gene mutations. Pegylated interferon-alpha has convincingly been proved to reduce the JAK2 allele burden. JAK2 inhibitor drugs are currently being tested in clinical trials. The development of pathogenesis-targeted diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to the various MPNs will continue in the future.     

Endometrial stromal tumors: Diagnostic updates and challenges

Endometrial stromal tumors are rare uterine mesenchymal tumors of endometrial stromal origin. They are classified into endometrial stromal nodule, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma by the current (2020) WHO classification. Correct diagnosis of endometrial stromal tumors is critical for proper patient management. However, due to infrequent encounters, overlapping morphological features and immunohistochemical profiles, the differential diagnoses among endometrial stromal lesions and their morphologic mimics are often challenging. Partially with our own experience, here we review and summarize the tumor morphology, immunohistochemical phenotype, as well as molecular feature of endometrial stromal tumors and key differential diagnoses, emphasizing the newest developments and their utilization in daily practice.     

Emerging soft tissue tumors with kinase fusions: An overview of the recent literature with an emphasis on diagnostic criteria

A recent breakthrough in the classification of soft tissue tumors (STT) has been a significant expansion in the number of neoplasms associated with NTRK and other kinase related fusions. This is important not only for diagnostic purposes, but also because it opens new avenues for targeted therapy. Indeed, recent clincal trials have shown significant benefit across multiple tumor‐types, prompting approval of NTRK inhibitors for clinical use in the setting of advanced/metastatic NTRK‐rearranged neoplasms. Despite these therapeutic oportunities, diagnostic challenges have transpired in recognizing these emerging new histologic subtypes of kinase fusions positive‐STT prospectively. This, in part, is attributable to their wide morphologic spectrum, variable risk of malignancy, and non‐specific immunoprofile. As such, recommendations for pathologic criteria and immunohistochemical testing are needed to improve classification and streamline the small subset of potential candidates for further molecular validation. This overview summarizes the key histologic features of various STT associated with NTRK and other kinase fusions, which appear to share a similar morphologic spectrum. Immunohistochemically, many of these tumors, regardless of the kinase fusion type, notably show co‐expression of S100 and CD34; issues related to the utility of pan‐NTRK and NTRK1 immunostaining are therefore summarized. Finally, I discuss the role of confirmatory molecular testing and how, in some instances, this may also be of prognostic value. This review is intended as a critical summary of the current literature to emphasize pathologic criteria for improving recognition of this emerging and complex group of kinase fusion associated STT.     

Emerging entities in NUTM1‐rearranged neoplasms

Structural alterations of NUTM1 were originally thought to be restricted to poorly differentiated carcinomas with variable squamous differentiation originating in the midline organs of children and adolescents. Termed NUT carcinomas (NCs), they were defined by a t(15;19) chromosomal rearrangement that was found to result in a BRD4‐NUTM1 gene fusion. However, the use of DNA and RNA‐based next‐generation sequencing has recently revealed a multitude of new NUTM1 fusion partners in a diverse array of neoplasms including sarcoma‐like tumors, poromas, and acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALLs) that we propose to call NUTM1‐rearranged neoplasms (NRNs). Intriguingly, the nosology of NRNs often correlates with the functional classification of the fusion partner, suggesting different oncogenic mechanisms within each NRN division. Indeed, whereas NCs are characterized by their aggressiveness and intransigence to standard therapeutic measures, the more positive clinical outcomes seen in some sarcoma and ALL NRNs may reflect these mechanistic differences. Here we provide a broad overview of the molecular, nosological, and clinical features in these newly discovered neoplastic entities. We describe how aberrant expression of NUTM1 due to fusion with an N‐terminal DNA/chromatin‐binding protein can generate a potentially powerful chromatin modifier that can give rise to oncogenic transformation in numerous cellular contexts. We also conclude that classification, clinical behavior, and therapeutic options may be best defined by the NUTM1 fusion partner rather than by tumor morphology or immunohistochemical profile.     

Peripheral nerve sheath tumors: an update and review of diagnostic challenges

Peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs) are one of the more common soft tissue neoplasms encountered in the daily surgical pathology practice, most of which have classic histologic features. There are, however, some common diagnostic challenges encountered by surgical pathologists and neuropathologists, as well as controversies regarding classification and grading of PNSTs. As molecular studies advance and novel targeted therapies are developed, it has become imperative that we become familiar with the diagnostic criteria for these common neoplasms and their potential mimics.     

Rare embryonal and sarcomatous central nervous system tumours: State-of-the art and future directions

The introduction of molecular methods into the diagnostics of central nervous system (CNS) tumours and the subsequent deciphering of their molecular heterogeneity has resulted in a significant impact on paediatric neurooncology. Particularly in the field of rare embryonal and sarcomatous CNS tumours, novel tumour types have been delineated and introduced in the recent 5th edition of the WHO classification of CNS tumours. The rarity and novelty of these tumour types result in diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Apart from distinct histopathological and molecular features, these tumour types exhibit characteristic clinical properties and require different therapeutic approaches for optimal patient management. However, based on the limited availability of clinical data, current therapeutic recommendations have to be based on data from small, predominantly retrospective patient cohorts. Within this article, we provide guidance for diagnostic work-up and clinical management of rare CNS embryonal tumours (‘embryonal tumour with multi-layered rosettes’, ETMR; ‘CNS neuroblastoma, FOXR2-activated’, CNS NB-FOXR2; ‘CNS tumour with BCOR-ITD, CNS BCOR-ITD) and rare CNS sarcomatous tumours (‘primary intracranial sarcoma, DICER1-mutant’, CNS DICER1; ‘CIC-rearranged sarcoma’, CNS CIC). By emphasizing the significant consequences on patient management in paediatric CNS tumours, we want to encourage wide implementation of comprehensive molecular diagnostics and stress the importance for joint international efforts to further collect and study these rare tumour types.     

Problematic areas and new developments in uterine mesenchymal tumours

Pure mesenchymal tumours of the uterus broadly comprise two major categories, smooth muscle neoplasms and endometrial stromal neoplasms. Of these the most common tumours are smooth muscle tumours of the uterus, the majority of these are benign and are recognised as leiomyomata routinely. Leiomyosarcoma is the commonest malignant mesenchymal tumour of the uterus accounting for >50% of uterine sarcomas and comprising 1–2% of uterine malignancies. Variants of both benign and malignant tumours are recognised and increasingly, through the evolution of more sophisticated immunohistochemistry and molecular techniques we are aware of the many “pitfalls” in their diagnosis which will be discussed in this review. The second major category comprises endometrial stromal tumours which has undergone re-classification in the WHO 2014 classification and has been the subject of a recent review in this journal. Despite it being the second most common uterine sarcoma, it is encountered infrequently in routine diagnostic practice, and its benign counterpart is approximately 8× less frequent. Endometrial stromal tumours will not be comprehensively considered in this review, but only in the context of differential diagnosis.This review will attempt to update the reader with recently described entities that may lead to diagnostic confusion and provide a diagnostic approach.     

The genotypic-phenotypic approach redefines the prognostic evaluation of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms

Lung neuroendocrine neoplasms are heterogeneous in terms of morphological features and clinical behavior. The four-tired WHO classification scheme, together with TNM stage, are currently the most effective prognostic indicators and, to date, they define the clinical management and therapeutic strategies in these neoplasms. However, in the last decade novel information on the phenotypical characteristics and molecular background of these tumors resulted in the proposal of novel biomarkers indicative of biological or clinical behavior. Although most of them are strongly histotype-dependent, some others have been proposed to be significantly associated to tumor characteristics also within individual tumor groups, and are therefore potential additional and complementary tools, with special reference to the carcinoid patients group whose prognostic prediction is still very uneffective. Indeed, these candidate biomarkers are still to be integrated in a multimodal approach and are in the vast majority of cases not validated in independent or prospective series and have been analyzed, with special reference to the molecular ones, on relatively small case series. Once the characterization of these tumors will be further refined, the clinical impact of these information will be strongly determined by their potentiality to be integrated with the current classification, and the tight collaboration between those who are active in this subject (diagnostic pathologists, molecular pathologists/biologists, clinicians) is necessary for a validation in the clinical practice.     

Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated soft tissue neoplasms: Immunohistochemical surrogates for differential diagnosis

Undifferentiated soft tissue sarcomas (USTS) are described in the current World Health Organization Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours as those showing no identifiable line of differentiation when analyzed by presently available technologies. This is a markedly heterogeneous group, and the diagnosis of USTS remains one of exclusion. USTS can be divided into four morphologic subgroups: pleomorphic, spindle cell, round cell and epithelioid undifferentiated sarcomas, with this combined group accounting for up to 20% of all soft tissue sarcomas. As molecular advances enable the stratification of emerging genetic subsets within USTS, particularly within undifferentiated round cell sarcomas, other groups, particularly the category of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS), still remain difficult to substratify and represent heterogeneous collections of neoplasms often representing the common morphologic endpoints of a variety of malignant tumors of various (mesenchymal and non-mesenchymal) lineages. However, recent molecular developments have also enabled the identification and correct classification of many tumors from various lines of differentiation that would previously have been bracketed under ‘UPS’. This includes pleomorphic neoplasms and dedifferentiated neoplasms (the latter typically manifesting with an undifferentiated pleomorphic morphology) of mesenchymal (e.g. solitary fibrous tumor and gastrointestinal stromal tumor) and non-mesenchymal (e.g. melanoma and carcinoma) origin. The precise categorization of ‘pleomorphic’ or ‘undifferentiated’ neoplasms is critical for prognostication, as, for example, dedifferentiated liposarcoma typically behaves less aggressively than other pleomorphic sarcomas, and for management, including the potential for targeted therapies based on underlying recurrent molecular features. In this review we focus on undifferentiated and dedifferentiated pleomorphic and spindle cell neoplasms, summarizing their key genetic, morphologic and immunophenotypic features in the routine diagnostic setting, and the use of immunohistochemistry in their principal differential diagnosis, and highlight new developments and entities in the group of undifferentiated and dedifferentiated soft tissue sarcomas.     

Targeted RNA sequencing: A routine ancillary technique in the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue neoplasms

The past decade has witnessed remarkable progress in delineating the molecular pathogenesis of many mesenchymal neoplasms. This, in large part, is attributable to the application of next‐generation sequencing. As these techniques decrease in cost, and increasingly support the use of routine clinical specimens—such as formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissue and cytology samples—they are beginning to be routinely implemented in diagnostic pathology laboratories. The breadth of testing possible by next‐generation sequencing makes this a useful adjunct for pathologists, particularly with the emergence of targeted therapies. The intent of this article is to share our experience, over 2 years, as an early adopter of targeted RNA sequencing as an ancillary diagnostic technique for fusion gene detection in bone and soft tissue neoplasms.     

Paediatric and adult soft tissue sarcomas with NTRK1 gene fusions: a subset of spindle cell sarcomas unified by a prominent myopericytic/haemangiopericytic pattern

Neoplasms with a myopericytomatous pattern represent a morphological spectrum of lesions encompassing myopericytoma of the skin and soft tissue, angioleiomyoma, myofibromatosis/infantile haemangiopericytoma and putative neoplasms reported as malignant myopericytoma. Lack of reproducible phenotypic and genetic features of malignant myopericytic neoplasms have prevented the establishment of myopericytic sarcoma as an acceptable diagnostic category. Following detection of a LMNA–NTRK1 gene fusion in an index case of paediatric haemangiopericytoma‐like sarcoma by combined whole‐genome and RNA sequencing, we identified three additional sarcomas harbouring NTRK1 gene fusions, termed 'spindle cell sarcoma, NOS with myo/haemangiopericytic growth pattern'. The patients were two children aged 11 months and 2 years and two adults aged 51 and 80 years. While the tumours of the adults were strikingly myopericytoma‐like, but with clear‐cut atypical features, the paediatric cases were more akin to infantile myofibromatosis/haemangiopericytoma. All cases contained numerous thick‐walled dysplastic‐like vessels with segmental or diffuse nodular myxohyaline myo‐intimal proliferations of smooth muscle actin‐positive cells, occasionally associated with thrombosis. Immunohistochemistry showed variable expression of smooth muscle actin and CD34, but other mesenchymal markers, including STAT6, were negative. This study showed a novel variant of myo/haemangiopericytic sarcoma with recurrent NTRK1 gene fusions. Given the recent introduction of a novel therapeutic approach targeting NTRK fusion‐positive neoplasms, recognition of this rare but likely under‐reported sarcoma variant is strongly encouraged. Copyright © 2016 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.