Third-line rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

H pylori gastric infection is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases worldwide. The discovery that most upper gastrointestinal diseases are related to H pylori infection and therefore can be treated with antibiotics is an important medical advance. Currently, a first-line triple therapy based on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus two antibiotics (clarithromycin and amo-xicillin or nitroimidazole) is recommended by all consensus conferences and guidelines. Even with the correct use of this drug combination, infection can not be eradicated in up to 23% of patients. Therefore, several second line therapies have been recommended. A 7 d quadruple therapy based on PPI, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole is the more frequently accepted. However, with second-line therapy, bacterial eradication may fail in up to 40% of cases. When H pylori eradication is strictly indicated the choice of further treatment is controversial. Currently, a standard third-line therapy is lacking and various protocols have been proposed. Even after two consecutive failures, the most recent literature data have demonstrated that H pylori eradication can be achieved in almost all patients, even when antibiotic susceptibility is not tested. Different possibilities of empirical treatment exist and the available third-line strategies are herein reviewed.     

Helicobacter pylori therapy: first-line options and rescue regimen

In the present paper, several points regarding Helicobacter pylori treatment are reviewed, with the following conclusions: (1) all different proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are equivalent when prescribed with antibiotics; (2) ranitidine bismuth citrate is equal to or, in some cases with antibiotic resistance, more effective than PPI; (3) previous treatment with PPI does not seem to affect the rate of eradication obtained with PPI plus two antibiotics; (4) just 1 week of PPI is enough to obtain duodenal ulcer healing, provided that H. pylori eradication is achieved; (5) the eradication rates seem to be higher in peptic ulcer than in nonulcer dyspepsia; (6) in areas where the prevalence of metronidazole resistance is high, triple therapy including a PPI, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin is the best option, and (7) quadruple therapy (PPI, bismuth, tetracycline, and metronidazole) is the recommended second-line therapy after PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure, although replacing the PPI and the bismuth compound by ranitidine bismuth citrate achieves also good results.     

Effects of in vitro antibiotic resistance on treatment: bismuth-containing regimens.

Bismuth compounds remain useful for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. These include colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS), bismuth subsalicylate (BSS) and, most recently, ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC). CBS appears to prevent the development of imidazole resistance when coadministered with nitroimidazoles. Traditional triple therapy with bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline or amoxicillin (BMT/A) only partially overcomes metronidazole resistance. However, the addition of a PPI to bismuth triple therapy largely overcomes established metronidazole resistance if treatment is given for at least one week or more. When RBC rather than PPI is used with clarithromycin, this dual regimen appears to be more effective in preventing the development of secondary clarithromycin resistance. The triple combination of RBC, metronidazole and clarithromycin appears to be effective against metronidazole resistant strains of H pylori. Thus, overall, there is some evidence that bismuth compounds may prevent the development of antibiotic resistance and that existing antibiotic resistance may at least be partially overcome in vitro and in vivo. With the growing emergence of H pylori resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin, further research to clarify the role of bismuth compounds is required.     

Randomized Comparison of Ranitidine Bismuth Citrate-Based Triple Therapies for Helicobacter pylori

Objectives: In an attempt to increase the efficacy and simplicity of FDA-approved regimens for Helicobacter pylori , we studied (1) addition of an inexpensive antibiotic (amoxicillin) to twice-daily ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBO-clarithromycin dual therapy, and (2) substitution of RBC for bismuth subsalicylate + H2-receptor antagonist in bismuth-based triple therapy. Methods : Subjects with previously untreated Helicobacter pylori infection documented by ¹³C-urea breath test plus either endoscopic biopsy or serology were randomly assigned to a 2-wk course of (1) RBC 400 mg b.i.d. , amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. , and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. (RAC), or (2) RBC 400 mg b.i.d. , metronidazole 250 mg t.i.d. , and tetracycline 500 mg t.i.d. (RMT). Repeat breath test was performed 4 wk after the completion of therapy. Results : Intent-to-treat and per-protocol cure rates for RAC were 46 of 50 patients (92%) and 45 of 47 patients (96%); for RMT they were 40 of 50 patients (80%) and 37 of 42 patients (88%). Study drugs were stopped due to side effects in three patients (6%) taking RAC and six patients (12%) taking RMT. Conclusions : Twice-daily RBC-based triple therapy with clarithromycin and amoxicillin produces Helicobacter pylori eradication rates over 90%, which is comparable to rates seen with proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies. RBC also may be substituted for bismuth subsalicylate and an + H2-receptor antagonist in standard bismuth-based triple therapy.     

幽门螺杆菌不同治疗方案的疗效评估

目的 对本院门诊患者根除幽门螺杆菌(Hp)的不同治疗方案进行疗效比较.方法 选择2005年1月～2007年7月我院就诊的幽门螺杆菌治疗前后资料完整的患者522例,质子泵抑制剂(PPI) 克拉霉素 硝基咪唑类121例,PPI 克拉霉素 阿莫西林135例,PPI 硝基咪唑类 阿莫西林80例;枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁 克拉霉素 硝基咪唑类63例,枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁(RBC) 克拉霉素 阿莫西林81例,RBC 硝基咪唑类 阿莫西林42例.结果 PPI 两种抗生素的治疗方案中,PPI 克拉霉素 阿莫西林的Hp根除率显著高于PPI 克拉霉素 硝基咪唑组,而与PPI 阿莫西林 硝基咪唑组比较无显著性差异;RBC 两种抗生素的治疗方案中,RBC 克拉霉素 阿莫西林的Hp根除率最高;在使用相同的抗生素的情况下,PPI组与RBC组根除Hp比较无显著性差异.结论 选择PPPI/RBC 克拉霉素 阿莫西林能更有效地根除Hp.     

Attitude facing a patient suffering from Helicobacter pylori infection resistant to a triple therapy.

Even with the current most effective treatment regimens, about 10-20% of patients will fail to eradicate H. pylori infection. Therefore, in designing a treatment strategy we should not focus on the results of primary therapy alone, but also on the final (over-all) eradication rate. The choice of a second-line treatment depends on which treatment was used initially, as retreatment with the same regimen is not recommended. In this respect, the first therapy should not be a regimen that combines clarithromycin and metronidazole in the same regimen, because of the problem of resistance against both antibiotics. Therefore, it seems that performing culture after a first eradication failure is not necessary and assessing H. pylori sensitivity to antibiotics only after failure of the second treatment may be suggested in clinical practice. Different possibilities of empirical treatment are suggested. After failure of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-amoxicillin-clarithromycin, quadruple therapy has been generally used. More recently, replacing the PPI and the bismuth compound by ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) has also achieved good results. After PPI-amoxicillin-nitroimidazole failure, retreatment with PPI-amoxicillin-clarithromycin has proved to be effective. Finally, rifabutin-based rescue therapies have shown to constitute an encouraging strategy for eradication failures, as they are effective for H. pylori strains resistant to antibiotics.     

One-week dual therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate and clarithromycin for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in Brazilian patients with peptic ulcer

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin given for 1 wk in Brazilian patients with peptic ulcer. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with peptic ulcer were randomized in two treatment groups: (1)1-wk regimen consisting of ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.i.d. with clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. or (2) 2-wk regimen of the same treatment. Eradication of the infection was considered when both the histologic examination and the urease test were negative for the infection 3 mo after treatment. RESULTS: By intention to treat analysis, Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) was eradicated in 73% and 76% of patients, respectively treated for 1 or 2 wk (P>0.05). By per protocol analysis, the eradication rates were 80% and 83%, respectively, in patients treated for 1 or 2 wk (P>0.05). Nine patients (8.2%) reported minor side effects. CONCLUSION: One-week therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate and clarithromycin is safe, well tolerated and effective for treatment of H pylori infection, and appears to be comparable to the 2-wk regimen in terms of efficacy.x     

Do patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia respond differently to Melicobacter pylorieradication treatments from those with peptic ulcer disease？ A systematic review

AIM: It is controversial whether patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) respond differently to Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) eradication treatment than those with peptic ulcer disease (PUD). To review the evidence for any difference in H pylorieradication rates between PUD and NUD patients. METHODS: A literature search for full articles and meeting abstracts to July 2004 was conducted. We included studies evaluating the efficacy of a proton pump inhibitor (P) or ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus two antibiotics of clarithromycin (C), amoxicillin (A), metronidazole (M), or P-based quadruple therapies for eradicating the infection. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies met the criteria. No significant difference in eradication rates was found between PUD and NUD patients when treated with 7-d RBCCA, 10-d PCA or P-based quadruple therapies. When the 7-d PCA was used, the pooled H pylori eradication rate was 82.1% (431/525) and 72.6% (448/617) for PUD and NUD patients, respectively, yielding a RR of 1.15 (95%CI 1.01-1.29). However, the statistically significant difference was seen only in meeting abstracts, but not in full publications. CONCLUSION: There is no convincing evidence to suggest that NUD patients respond to H pylori eradication treatments differently from those with PUD, although a trend exists with the 7-d PCA therapy.     

Ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapies as a second-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori in Turkish patients

BACKGROUND: Quadruple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline is recommended as the optimal second-line therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection in the Maastricht Consensus Report. The aim of the present paper was to evaluate the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based regimens as second-line therapies after failure of the standard Maastricht triple therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixteen H. pylori-positive patients were given omeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d., and amoxicillin 1 g b.d for 10 days. Patients remaining H. pylori-positive (n = 29) were combined with 27 patients enrolled after an initial eradication failure from proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin and clarithromycin therapy for at least 7 days and were randomly given one of the following second-line 10-day treatments: RBC 400 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (RAC group, n = 28) and RBC 400 mg b.d., metronidazole 500 mg b.d and tetracycline 500 mg b.d. (RMT group, n = 28). Eradication was assessed by either histology and rapid urease test or (13)C urea breath test 8 weeks after therapy. RESULTS: The eradication rate of first-line Maastricht therapy was 67% for intention-to-treat analysis (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58-75). Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication was achieved in 60.7% of patients (95%CI: 42-79) in the RAC group and in 85.7% of patients (95%CI: 73-98) in the RMT group (P = 0.03). Fifty-three percent of patients in the RAC and 50% of patients in the RMT group experienced at least one slight side-effect (P = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: RMT is an effective and well-tolerated second-line therapy after H. pylori eradication failure from PPI, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy is more effective in peptic ulcer than in non-ulcer dyspepsia.

AIM: To evaluate whether eradication therapy is more effective in peptic ulcer disease (PUD) than in non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 481 patients with NUD (183 patients) or PUD (298 patients) infected with Helicobacter pylori included in several prospective clinical trials. Three eradication regimens were given: (1) proton pump inhibitor (PPI) plus clarithromycin, plus either amoxycillin or metronidazole for 7 days (297 patients); (2) ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus clarithromycin plus amoxycillin for 7 days (79 patients); and (3) RBC plus clarithromycin plus amoxycillin plus metronidazole for 5 days (105 patients). H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test 4 weeks after completing treatment. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication rates were 82% (95% CI 78-87%) with PPI plus two antibiotics for 7 days, 85% (95% CI 75-91%) with RBC plus two antibiotics for 7 days, and 91% (95% CI 86-97%) with RBC plus three antibiotics for 5 days (P < 0.05 compared with the first regimen). Overall, the H. pylori eradication rate in patients with NUD was 78% (95% CI 71-84%), while in patients with PUD it was 89% (95% CI 86-93%) (P < 0.001). Both the combination of PPI plus two antibiotics for 7 days and the combination of RBC plus three antibiotics for 5 days were more effective in PUD than in NUD patients. However, RBC plus clarithromycin plus amoxycillin for 7 days was equally effective in both diseases. RBC plus two antibiotics for 7 days achieved better results than the same therapy with PPI only in NUD patients (84% v. 59%, P < 0.01), but both regimens were similar when prescribed in PUD patients (86% v. 88%). In the multivariate analysis, the type of therapy, the diagnosis (NUD v. PUD), and the product variable of therapy (with RBC plus 2 antibiotics for 7 days) and diagnosis (interaction variable) were the only variables that influenced H. pylori eradication. The odds ratio (OR) for the effect of RBC versus PPI plus two antibiotics for 7 days in patients with NUD was 4 (95% CI 1.7-9.7; P < 0.01), whereas in patients with PUD no statistical significance was achieved (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.2-3.9). CONCLUSION: Overall, H. pylori eradication therapy is more effective in PUD than in NUD patients. This advantage of eradication therapies in PUD patients seems to be observed with 7-day PPI-based triple regimens, and with 5-day RBC-based quadruple therapy, while the 7-day RBC-based triple regimen seems to be equally effective in both diseases.     

Ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy for seven days, with or without further anti-secretory therapy, is highly effective in patients with duodenal ulcer and Helicobacter pylori infection

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two protocols for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection and the healing of active duodenal ulcer: (i) ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus two antibiotics for 7 days, and (ii) the same triple therapy followed by 3 weeks of anti-secretory drug treatment. METHODS: The study comprised 102 patients with active duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection; the patients were randomized to open treatment with either RBC 400 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 7 days, or the same treatment followed by 3 weeks of RBC 400 mg b.d. alone. Ulcer healing was confirmed by endoscopy. H. pylori eradication was assessed by endoscopy, rapid urease test and histology. RESULTS: The ulcer healed in 48/50 patients on RBC-based triple therapy alone (96.0%) and in 51/52 patients on triple therapy plus further anti-secretory treatment (98.1%). On an intention-to-treat basis, H. pylori had been successfully eradicated in 42/50 patients on triple therapy (84.0%) and in 44/52 patients on triple therapy plus anti-secretory treatment (84.6%), while by per protocol analysis the H. pylori eradication rates were 91.3% (42/46) and 89.8% (44/49), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: One-week triple therapy with RBC, amoxycillin and clarithromycin is highly effective in eradicating H. pylori and healing duodenal ulcers, even if not followed by anti-secretory drug treatment.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori is a serious, chronic, progressive, and transmissible infection associated with a significant morbidity and mortality, which alone emphasizes the priority of developing adequate prophylactic or therapeutic measures. What was previously termed "asymptomatic H. pylori infection" is now recognized as a latent infection, and it is now accepted that the presence of an H. pylori infection is an indication for eradication therapy. Successful cure of H. pylori infection requires 2 or more antibiotics. Antibiotic resistance is the major impediment of cure. The ideal duration of therapy is unknown, but in general, 1 week therapy is less effective than longer durations. Compliance is important for the success of treatment; therefore, the favored regimen should have the least side effects. At present, a proton pump inhibitor (or ranitidine bismuth citrate)-clarithromycin triple therapy with either amoxicillin or metronidazole, for at least 10 days is considered first-line therapy. The alternative is quadruple therapy containing a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, tetracycline, and a higher dose of metronidazole. Quadruple therapy is the best choice after failure of proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin triple therapy. Confirmation of successful therapy with a urea breath test or a stool antigen test is now the standard of practice.     

Ten-day triple therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin in eradicating Helicobacter pylori

OBJECTIVE: Fourteen-day therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin has been shown to have a high Helicobacter pylori eradication rate (> 90%) in U.S. trials. The aim of this study was to determine the H. pylori eradication rate of a ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple regimen of shorter duration (10 days), which has been shown to be effective in Europe. METHODS: Dyspeptic patients who had a positive baseline 13C-urea breath test and either a positive antral rapid urease test or positive IgG serology were studied. Treatment consisted of ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and amoxicillin 1 g, all given b.i.d. for 10 days. Eradication was determined >4 wk after completion of therapy by the 13C-urea breath test (enrichment <2.4%). Results are expressed for intent-to-treat (all patients randomized even if they did not take the drug) and per-protocol (major protocol violators excluded) analyses. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients with a mean age of 48 +/- 1.8 yr were studied. Forty-eight patients had eradication of H. pylori with this regimen (62%), 16 patients (21%) did not have eradication, and 13 patients (17%) did not return for breath testing. By intent-to-treat analysis the eradication rate was 62% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 51%, 73%) and by per-protocol analysis the eradication rate was 75% (95% CI, 63%, 85%). CONCLUSIONS: Ten-day, twice-daily therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin has an eradication rate that ranges from 62-75%. Fourteen-day therapy may be preferable because of higher eradication rates.     

Effectiveness of ranitidine bismuth citrate, clarithromycin, and metronidazole therapy for treating Helicobacter pylori

OBJECTIVE: There are limited data available from the United States on the effectiveness of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus two antibiotics to treat Helicobacter pylori. Therefore, the following study was undertaken to evaluate RBC with two antibiotics, which have been used successfully in combination, to treat H. pylori. METHODS: Adults with and without abdominal symptoms, who had never received H. pylori eradication therapy, were tested for the presence of H. pylori infection either by in-office rapid serology assays or histology. Positive subjects were administered the 13C-urea breath test. Subjects who had a positive urea breath test were then treated with RBC 400 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d. for 10 days. Four to 6 wk after completing antibiotics all subjects were asked to return for a second urea breath test to assess treatment success. RESULTS: Forty-seven of the 50 subjects enrolled into this study completed the antibiotic regimen and returned for a repeat urea breath test. Thirty-seven subjects were negative for H. pylori by urea breath test and 10 were positive, resulting in a 79% eradication rate. Seven subjects (14%) stopped their medication because of side effects. When analysis was performed on the 40 subjects who took > or = 80% of their medication (per-protocol), the eradication rate was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of RBC with clarithromycin and metronidazole successfully treated H. pylori infection after only 10 days of therapy. The per-protocol eradication rate from this study was similar to that seen with Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved regimens. In conclusion, RBC plus clarithromycin and metronidazole should be considered as a first-line treatment regimen for H. pylori infection, and may only need to be taken for a period of 10 days, as opposed to 14 days for FDA-approved regimens.     

'Rescue' therapies for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori infection is the main cause of gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer and gastric cancer and should be considered as a major public health issue. According to several international guidelines, first-line therapy for treating H. pylori infection consists of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) with any two antibiotics of amoxicillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole given for 7-14 days. However, even with the recommended treatment regimens, approximately 20% of patients will fail to obtain H. pylori eradication. The proportion of patients with first-line H. pylori therapy failure may be higher in clinical practice and it may increase thanks to diffusion of H. pylori treatment. The recommended second-line therapy is the quadruple regimen composed by tetracycline, metronidazole, bismuth salts and a PPI. However, the efficacy of this regimen is limited by poor patient's compliance due to its side effects, number of tablets per day, and long duration. Moreover, bismuth and metronidazole are not available in all countries. Alternatively, a longer-lasting (i.e. 10-14 days) PPI or RBC triple therapy with two antibiotics has generally been used. In an empirical strategy, the choice of second line depends on the treatment initially used. If a clarithromycin-based regimen was administered in first line, a quadruple regimen or PPI (or RBC) triple therapy with metronidazole and amoxicillin (or tetracycline) should be suggested as a second line. In case of second-line treatment failure, the patient should be evaluated by a case-by-case approach. A susceptibility-guided strategy, if available, is recommended in order to choose the best third-line treatment. Culture can reveal the presence of H. pylori-sensitive strains to clarithromycin (the best effective) or other antimicrobials (such as amoxicillin, metronidazole and tetracycline). Conversely, in an empirical strategy, a third-line not yet used therapy, can reach a high success rate. PPI or RBC, amoxicillin and a new antimicrobial (e.g. rifabutin, levofloxacin or furazolidone) could be used. Several studies have obtained relatively good results with triple therapy combining PPI, rifabutin, and amoxicillin, although a reversible myelotoxicity as leukopenia and thrombocytopenia has been described. Preliminary good results were also achieved with triples PPI regimens combining levofloxacin and amoxicillin without important adverse effects. Furazolidone has also shown efficacy for H. pylori eradication, although untoward reactions could limit its use, especially when high doses are employed. Finally, in more than one H. pylori treatment failure, non-antimicrobial add-on medications (such as lactoferrin, probiotics and others) could be used with the aim either to improve the eradication rate or to minimize side effects.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection]

Significant progress and new insights have been gained since Helicobacter pylori was found in 1982. Even with currently most effective treatment regimen, about 10-20% of patients will fail to obtain the eradication of H. pylori infection. This review will focus on the empirical treatment for H. pylori infection in Korea. Seven days triple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) has been the main first line therapy for H. pylori infection in Korea after the recommendation by Korean H. pylori study group in 1998. Such triple therapy has been the effective regimen for eradication of H. pylori infection. However, the efficacy of 7 days proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin therapy becomes lower and various eradication rates probably reflects the increase in antimicrobial resistance, recently. The recent multi-center prospective randomized study and meta-analysis showed 14 days proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin therapy is more effective than 7 days or 10 days therapy. In the case of failure, quadruple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, a bismuth salt, metronidazole and tetracycline) is a very effective second-line regimen. After the failure of two or more eradication treatments, bacterial resistance to antibiotics should be evaluated and the regimen of third-line therapy should be selected according to each antimicrobial susceptibility. The empirical third-line therapies, recommended in the cases that antimicrobial susceptibility test is unavailable, are unclear of its validity at present in Korea. The triple therapies including rifabutin, moxifloxacin, or levofloxacin or dual therapy including high dose proton pump inhibitor and amoxicillin are needed to be proven as possible candidates for the empirical third-line therapy. Multiple eradication failures should be handled on a case-by-case basis by specialists.     

Duodenal ulcer healing rates in a one-year follow-up study with ranitidine bismuth citrate and antibiotics

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the one-year outcome of an eradication therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate and antibiotics in Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulcer patients in respect to ulcer and Helicobacter pylori relapse rates. METHODOLOGY: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study involved 648 duodenal ulcer patients and had been carried out to compare the following regimens: ranitidine bismuth citrate b.i.d. co-prescribed with either clarithromycin 250 mg q.i.d. or clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. or clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. plus metronidazole 400 mg b.i.d. for 2 weeks, followed by a further 14 days of treatment with ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.i.d. to facilitate ulcer healing. H. pylori eradication was assessed by 13C-urea breath test and histology at least 4 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks after the end of treatment. Ulcer relapse and H. pylori status were assessed 4 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks post-treatment or if ulcer symptoms recurred. For the remainder of the follow-up period only serious adverse events were collected. RESULTS: At 12 months data of 438 (69%) patients were evaluable. The observed H. pylori eradication rates were 88-91%. H. pylori relapse rates were 2.1% after 26 weeks and 3.9% after 52 weeks. At the week 26 visit 26 patients (5.6%) and at the week 52 visit 25 patients (5.7%) had documented gastroesophageal reflux disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the reduction of duodenal ulcer relapses after the cure of Helicobacter pylori infection.     

Six-day therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate plus low-dose clarithromycin and tinidazole to cure Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Short-term ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple regimens have been shown to be effective for the eradication of H. pylori. We investigated the efficacy of an eradicating therapy including ranitidine bismuth citrate, low-dose clarithromycin and tinidazole, administered for only 6 days. METHODOLOGY: Forty-five consecutive patients, who underwent gastroscopy for symptoms and were found to be H. pylori-positive, were recruited. They received ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.i.d. plus clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d. plus tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d., given for 6 days. The medications given in twice daily doses were taken after meals with an interval of 12 h. The H. pylori status was evaluated by means of histology and rapid urease test on admission, and by 13C-urea breath test alone 8 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: All 45 enrolled patients completed the study. Thirty-nine of 45 patients returned H. pylori-negative (both per protocol and intention-to-treat analysis = 87%; 95% confidence interval = from 73-95%), while 6 of 45 were still H. pylori-positive (13%). Slight or mild side effects occurred in 5/45 patients (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy, containing low-dose clarithromycin and tinidazole, given for only 6 days, yielded high eradication rates with modest side effects. Regimens based on ranitidine bismuth citrate plus two antibiotics at low dosages, administered for less than 7 days, constitute highly promising strategies for eradication of H. pylori.     

How to proceed in Helicobacter pylori-positive chronic gastritis refractory to first- and second-line eradication therapy

Helicobacter pylori is a widespread disease causing most of the peptic ulcer diseases and low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoreticular tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Moreover, H. pylori is a proven environmental risk factor for gastric carcinoma and it has been recognized as a type 1 carcinogen factor. A combination of drugs has been proposed, using a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline to treat the infection. Since 1996, according to the European guidelines, the first-line approach using PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin or metronidazole has been suggested. Seven days of quadruple therapy with PPI (or ranitidine), tetracycline, bismuth salts and metronidazole has been reserved as second-line treatment. To improve the eradication rate of the triple therapy, a different combination of the available antibiotics has been proposed, consisting of a 10-day sequential regimen. A second-line levofloxacin-amoxicillin-based triple therapy given for 10 days has been proposed, obtaining a high eradication rate, suggesting this regimen to be a suitable retreatment option in eradication failure. A third-line treatment with rifabutin-based regimen has been proposed.     

A randomized trial comparing seven-day ranitidine bismuth citrate and clarithromycin dual therapy to seven-day omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

OBJECTIVE: To assess Helicobacter pylori eradication after one week dual ranitidine bismuth citrate-clarithromycin (RBC-C) or triple omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin (OCA) therapy. METHODS: In this multicentre Canadian trial, H pylori-positive patients with functional dyspepsia or inactive peptic ulcer disease were randomized to open-label treatment with RBC-C (ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg plus clarithromycin 500 mg) or OCA (omezaprole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1000 mg), given twice a day for seven days. Treatment allocation was randomly assigned. H pylori infection was confirmed by positive 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT). H pylori status was reassessed by UBT at least four and 12 weeks after treatment (negative: d13CO2 below 3.5 per mil). Intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates were determined for all patients with confirmed H pylori infection. Per protocol (PP) rate was determined for all patients treated with at least two evaluable follow-up visits. RESULTS: Three hundred five patients were included in the ITT and 222 in the PP analysis. The ITT eradication rates were 66% for RBC-C and 78% for OCA. The PP success rates were 84% for RBC-C and 96% for OCA. The difference for both ITT 12% (95% CI 2 to 22) and PP 12% (95% CI 4 to 19) were statistically significant, P=0.030 and P=0.007, respectively. Treatment was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The eradication rate for the seven-day dual RBC-C regimen was lower than that for OCA.