肠道子宫内膜异位症诊断及治疗

摘要：肠道子宫内膜异位症是指子宫内膜异位症病灶侵入或生长于部分或全部肠壁的浆肌层,主要表现是痛经、性交痛、排便痛。肠道子宫内膜异位症可以位于整个消化道的许多部位,但以乙状结肠和直肠交界处最常见。直肠气钡双重造影、经阴道超声、直肠内镜超声、磁共振成像(MRI)、多层螺旋CT等有助于明确诊断。药物治疗可以暂时控制症状,但不能使患者长期获益。根治性子宫内膜异位症病灶切除,包括肠道子宫内膜异位症病灶切除,是治疗肠道子宫内膜异位症的有效方法。肠道子宫内膜异位结节切除方法有表面病灶切除术,病灶碟形切除术和肠管节段性切除吻合术。尽管手术切除肠道子宫内膜异位症病灶还存在争议,但是越来越多的研究显示创伤性的手术改善了肠道子宫内膜异位症患者的症状及生存质量,增加了患者受孕机会。     

Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment

Deep endometriosis, defined as adenomyosis externa, mostly presents as a single nodule, larger than 1 cm in diameter, in the vesicouterine fold or close to the lower 20 cm of the bowel. When diagnosed, most nodules are no longer progressive. In >95% of cases, deep endometriosis is associated with very severe pain (in >95%) and is probably a cofactor in infertility. Its prevalence is estimated to be 1%?-2%. Deep endometriosis is suspected clinically and can be confirmed by ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging. Contrast enema is useful to evaluate the degree of sigmoid occlusion. Surgery requires expertise to identify smaller nodules in the bowel wall, and difficulty increases with the size of the nodules. Excision is feasible in over 90% of cases often requiring suture of the bowel muscularis or full-thickness defects. Segmental bowel resections are rarely needed except for sigmoid nodules. Deep endometriosis often involves the ureter causing hydronephrosis in some 5% of cases. The latter is associated with 18% ureteral lesions. Deep endometriosis surgery is associated with late complications such as late bowel and ureteral perforations, and recto-vaginal and uretero-vaginal fistulas. Although rare, these complications require expertise in follow-up and laparoscopic management. Pain relief after surgery is excellent and some 50% of women will conceive spontaneously, despite often severe adhesions after surgery. Recurrence of deep endometriosis is rare. In conclusion, defined as adenomyosis externa, deep endometriosis is a rarely a progressive and recurrent disease. The treatment of choice is surgical excision, while bowel resection should be avoided, except for the sigmoid.     

Excision of Deep Endometriosis of the Rectosigmoid: Individualizing Care to the Presenting Pathology

Study ObjectiveTo highlight different surgical approaches for managing deep infiltrating endometriosis involving the rectosigmoid colon.DesignDemonstration of specific surgical techniques with educational narrated video footage.SettingBowel endometriosis is reported in 3.8% to 37% of patients with endometriosis [1]. Most commonly, the rectosigmoid colon is involved. Pelvic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging may be useful in diagnosis and for surgical planning [2]. Treatment options include observation, medications, or surgery. There are various surgical techniques that can be used for excision of deep infiltrating endometriosis involving the rectosigmoid colon. Serosal shaving, discoid resection, and complete resection are the possible types of surgical interventions that are demonstrated in this surgical education video at an academic medical center. Serosal shaving is used for lesions with minimal involvement of the muscularis. It can be done sharply or with electrosurgery and it is imperative to assess bowel integrity after shaving. Discoid resection is used for lesions with muscularis involvement, <3 cm in size, and encompassing less than one-third to a half of the bowel circumference. Full-thickness discoid bowel resection can be done in various ways including manual resection with primary suture closure, regular stapler transabdominally, or EEA stapler (Medtronic EEA Circular Stapler, Minneapolis, MN) transrectally. Segmental resection is used for lesions >3 cm in size, involving >50% of the bowel circumference, or for multifocal lesions. Various suture and stapler methods exist for this technique.InterventionsBased on the imaging and intraoperative findings, a surgical technique was chosen and demonstrated. The types of surgical techniques demonstrated include laparoscopic serosal shaving, discoid resection with manual resection and primary suture closure, discoid resection with EEA stapler, and segmental resection.ConclusionKnowledge of different surgical approaches to excise endometriosis is essential to appropriately address a patient's unique pathology. The choice of which surgical technique to use should include consideration of the location of the lesion, depth and circumference of involvement, and the number of nodules present.     

Ultrasonography for bowel endometriosis

Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) should be the first-line investigation in patients with suspicion of deep endometriosis and, in particular, of rectosigmoid endometriosis. TVS cannot assess the presence of intestinal nodules located proximally to the sigmoid (such as ileal or cecal endometriotic nodules), because these lesions are beyond the field of the transvaginal probe. The ultrasonographic findings of rectosigmoid endometriosis are the presence of an irregular hypoechoic nodule in the anterior wall of the rectosigmoid colon. The learning curve for diagnosing rectosigmoid endometriosis by TVS is quite short; approximately, 40 scans are required to a sonographer who trained in general gynecologic ultrasonography to become proficient at diagnosing bowel endometriosis. Several meta-analyses confirmed the high diagnostic performance of TVS in diagnosing rectosigmoid endometriosis. The presence of “soft markers” (negative sliding sign and kissing ovaries) facilitates the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis. Enhanced TVS (rectal water-contrast transvaginal ultrasonography, sonovaginography, and tenderness-guided transvaginal ultrasonography) does not improve the performance of TVS in diagnosing rectosigmoid endometriosis. These investigations, however, may be useful to ascertain the depth of infiltration of endometriosis in the intestinal wall or the presence of rectal stenosis. Magnetic resonance imaging has the same performance of TVS in diagnosing rectosigmoid endometriosis; however, it should be recommended as a second-line technique in the preoperative workup of patients with previous equivocal TVS findings.     

Laparoscopic resection of intestinal endometriosis: a 5-year experience

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical manifestations, surgical techniques, and complications observed in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of intestinal deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized (Canadian Task Force Classification II-3). SETTING: University hospital and private practice. PATIENTS: We evaluated 125 patients with intestinal DIE treated from February 2000 through September 2005. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic radical excision of DIE followed by resection of the rectosigmoid colon. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The clinical examination of our patients demonstrated that 66.4% of patients had tenderness, whereas 80.8% had nodules on the pouch of Douglas. In 95.2% we observed pain caused by cervical mobilization, and all the patients had pain during the pouch of Douglas mobilization. Regarding bowel infiltration, preoperative investigation with rectal endoscopic ultrasonography was positive in all cases. Endoscopic rectal ultrasonography demonstrated the depth of intestinal infiltration. Superficial lesions were observed in 9.6% of patients and muscularis involvement in 71.2%. The segmental resection was performed in most of the patients (92%) and the linear resection in 6.4% of them. Median surgical time was 110 minutes, and the median hospital stay was 7 days after the surgery; the patients continued fasting for 3 to 7 days. The return to normal activity was achieved in a median 15 days after the surgery. The surgical procedure and the postoperative follow-up demonstrated no complications in 90.4% of the patients. Minor complications were observed in 4% of the cases. Major complications occurred in 5.6% of the patients, including 2 cases of intestinal fistulas (1.6%) and 3 cases of long-lasting urinary retention (2.4%). CONCLUSION: Clinical symptoms of patients with intestinal endometriosis are not specific. Operative laparoscopy is a safe and effective method to treat intestinal endometriosis. To avoid major complications, special attention must be paid to the intestinal anastomosis and to the nerve preservation.     

Histopathology-based combined surgical approach to rectovaginal endometriosis

Objective

To describe a new surgical approach to rectovaginal endometriosis. Rectovaginal endometriosis can be infiltrative or superficial involving the bowel. Only infiltrative disease should be treated by intestinal resection. However, infiltration of endometriosis cannot be confirmed by preoperative imaging techniques.

Methods

A total of 48 women with infiltrative rectovaginal endometriosis were included in this prospective study. Surgery was performed using a newly developed technique. All bowel resections were indicated according to operative findings and not on the basis of preoperative imaging technique results.

Results

The decision for rectosigmoidal resection was based on the results of the intraoperative dissection of the rectovaginal septum. Histologically, infiltration of the ventral bowel wall was confirmed in all cases.

Conclusion

This new surgical technique for the treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis allows precise diagnosis and treatment with low morbidity. A resection of the mesorectum is not necessary because the endometriotic nodules are always located on the antimesenteric surface of the bowel.     

Deep endometriosis: The place of laparoscopic shaving

Deep endometriosis (DE) is considered to be one of the most challenging conditions to manage, especially when it invades surrounding organs like the rectum. Surgical excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis is required when lesions are symptomatic, impairing bowel, urinary, sexual, and reproductive functions, or if they evolve. Preoperative radiological examination should be extensive to determine the appropriate surgery: laparoscopic shaving, disc excision, or rectal resection. We demonstrated that in the hands of experienced surgeons, rectal shaving is possible for DE in more than 95% of cases, with low complication rates compared to rectal resection. Shaving and bowel resection are associated with comparable recurrence rates. As shaving is indicated whatever the size of deep lesions, surgeons should first consider rectal shaving to remove DE. Bowel resection should only be performed in case of major rectal stenosis (>80%), multiple and/or posterior rectal lesions and stenotic sigmoid colon lesions.     

Symptoms before and after surgical removal of colorectal endometriosis that are assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonography

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of colorectal resection for endometriosis on symptoms and quality of life or on potential side effects. STUDY DESIGN: After magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonographic evaluations of symptomatic colorectal endometriosis, 27 consecutive women who underwent colorectal resection were included in this prospective study. They completed symptom questionnaires before and after the procedure. Linear pain scores for several gynecologic and digestive symptoms and impact on quality of life were recorded. RESULTS: The sensitivity and positive predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonographic evaluation for the diagnosis of colorectal endometriosis were 92.6% and 100% and 89% and 100%, respectively. Nonmenstrual pelvic pain (P = .001), dysmenorrhea (P < .0001), dyspareunia (P = .0002), and pain on defecation (P < .005) were improved by colorectal resection. No correlation was found between symptom intensity and lesion size, as evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging, rectal endoscopic sonographic evaluation, or histologic examination of the surgical specimen. Respectively, the conditions of 14, 11, 0, and 2 women were cured, improved, unchanged, or worsened. Median overall pre- and postoperative quality-of-life scores were 9 (range, 4-10) and 0 (range, 0-10), respectively (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Colorectal resection for endometriosis appears to relieve some symptoms. However, women should be informed that some symptoms may persist and that there is a risk of urinary and digestive side effects.     

Choosing the right technique for deep endometriosis

The surgical management of bowel endometriosis is a real challenge. In addition to the fact that only symptomatic patients should undergo surgery, no consensus has been approved in the literature.Among the surgical techniques, the surgeon has to choose between rectal shaving, disc excision, or segmental colorectal resection. All those procedures are associated with complications, but the risk of rectovaginal fistula is higher if a disc excision or segmental colorectal resection is performed. It is therefore of utmost importance to evaluate preoperatively the bowel infiltration by several imaging techniques to estimate the feasibility of a deep rectal shaving with possible incomplete removal of the endometriotic lesions or to discuss with the patient about the indication of a segmental bowel resection. Because of the risk of major preoperative and postoperative complications, proper patient counseling is mandatory.     

Ultrasound Prediction of Segmental Bowel Resection in Women with Rectovaginal Endometriosis: A Single-Center Experience

Study ObjectiveTo retrospectively evaluate the ability of routinely collected preoperative ultrasound data to predict bowel resection during surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis.Design and SettingPatients at the University College London Hospital who underwent surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis during a 6-year period were identified from the prospectively generated hospital (British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy) database. Imaging data were collected and analyzed to determine associations with the requirement for bowel resection.PatientsWe evaluated 228 consecutive women undergoing bowel surgery (shave, disc resection, or segmental resection) for rectovaginal endometriosis.InterventionsThe patients in our study underwent surgical resection of rectovaginal endometriosis and interventions included shave, disc resection, and segmental resection of the bowel. All patients underwent a preoperative transvaginal ultrasound to assess the extent of endometriosis.Measurements and Main ResultsThere were 206 rectal shaves (90.4%), 2 disc resections (0.9%), and 20 segmental bowel resections (8.8%). A multivariable analysis demonstrated an association between bowel resection and ≥2 nodules located in the rectovaginal space (odds ratio [OR] 6.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37–34.2), nodules in the vesicouterine pouch (OR 5.87; 95% CI, 1.03–33.3), and increasing nodule size (OR 2.39 per 1 cm increase per 1 cm diameter increase; 95% CI, 1.56–3.64).ConclusionUltrasound findings of endometriotic nodule location, number of nodules, and increasing size are independent predictors of segmental bowel resection at the time of surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis. This highlights the importance of accurate diagnostic evaluation to aid counseling and surgical planning in the preoperative setting for women with rectovaginal endometriosis.     

Postoperative Bowel Symptoms Improve over Time after Rectosigmoidectomy for Endometriosis

Study ObjectiveTo evaluate bowel function (changes in stool caliber, sensation of incomplete evacuation, stooling frequency, and rectal bleeding) and urinary function (dysuria and retention) after segmental resection in patients with bowel endometriosis.DesignRetrospective study.SettingTertiary hospital.PatientsA total of 413 (mean age = 33.6 ± 5.1 years) of reproductive aged women, with bowel endometriosis that underwent segmental bowel resection of the rectosigmoid from 2005 to 2018, without history of prior bowel surgery, without existing or history of malignancy.InterventionsLaparoscopic segmental bowel resection performed by the same team and with the same technique.Measurements and Main ResultsData collected from the patients’ records included length of resected segment, distance of the lesion from the anal verge, and complications. Information on intestinal and urinary function was obtained from a questionnaire applied before the surgery and at 2, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. There was a significant increase in the incidence of stool thinning and rectal bleeding 2 months after surgical procedure; these symptoms decreased significantly over time. The incidence of urinary symptoms decreased significantly over time after surgery. The length of the bowel segment resected was not associated with the postoperative symptoms, but the rectosigmoid lesion was significantly closer to the anal verge in patients with rectal bleeding and urinary symptoms. There was no association between the length of intestinal segment resected and the frequency of stooling. At 6 months, patients who had a decreased frequency of stooling underwent a resection closer to the anal verge (9.7 cm) in comparison with the ones with unchanged or increase frequency of stooling (10.1 cm and 10.7 cm, respectively; p <.05).ConclusionPatient complaints on bowel and urinary alterations after segmental resection were transient with significant improvement over time up to 12 months. Bowel and urinary symptoms were not associated with the size of the bowel segment resected, whereas rectal bleeding at 2 months after surgery was significantly associated with the distance from anal verge. Segmental resection was also associated with a great improvement in constipation at 12 months postoperative.     

Laparoscopic Technique for Discoid Resection of Rectal Endometriotic Nodules

ObjectiveTo show the surgical steps used to perform a rectal disc excision in the context of deep infiltrating endometriosis characterized by contiguity between an intestinal lesion and the retrocervical region.DesignStep-by-step video demonstration of the technique.SettingAlthough surgical options for the management of rectosigmoid endometriosis have been investigated increasingly, there is no consensus regarding patient eligibility for shaving, discoid resection, or segmental resection. In our practice, women with nodules ≤3 cm in size and >7 mm deep were considered as candidates for rectosigmoid disc excision [1]. Therefore patients’ selection, together with the adoption of a standardized surgical technique, has allowed us to maximize the chance of a successful discoid resection, minimizing the complications potentially derivable from this surgical procedure.InterventionsThe patient was a 30-year-old woman with a history of constipation, dyschezia, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain unresponsive to hormonal therapies. A preoperative ultrasonography showed complete obliteration of the pouch of Douglas owing to a rectal endometriotic nodule (21 × 7 × 12 mm) in contiguity with a deeply infiltrating retrocervical lesion (28 × 10 × 27 mm). As a result, the rectal nodule infiltrated the tunica muscularis with a distance from the anal verge of 9 cm and an estimated stenosis of 35%. A 3-dimensional laparoscopy was performed. After rectal mobilization and rectovaginal space opening, the intestinal nodule was isolated in its entire circumference (Fig. 1). A 33-mm transanal circular stapler was inserted into the rectum through the anus and used to perform disc excision and suture the rectal wall. The overall operative time was 55 minutes. No intraoperative complication occurred. A complete excision of endometriosis was achieved. The estimated blood loss was 10 mL. An intra-abdominal drain was not placed, and the urinary catheter was removed at the end of the surgery. The patient was discharged 3 days after surgery and did not experience postoperative complications. The diameters of the bowel endometriotic nodule, on measuring fresh specimen, were 20 × 7 × 13 mm.ConclusionsAdvanced laparoscopic surgical skills are needed to perform an effective and safe rectal discoid resection. Subspecialization and an adequate preoperative evaluation are of utmost importance to appropriately plan the treatment strategy against bowel endometriosis.     

Are symptoms after a colorectal segmental resection in deep endometriosis really improved? The point of view of women before and after surgery

Introduction: Bowel endometriosis can cause debilitating symptoms. Surgical colorectal resection is often required for symptomatic relief. Aim of our study was to evaluate quality of life over a one-year follow-up period in patients submitted to a colorectal resection for the treatment of deep endometriosis. Change in intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms, and reproductive outcome were also evaluated.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on a cohort of 20 women affected by intestinal endometriosis and submitted to a laparoscopic colorectal resection. The subjects completed a questionnaire about quality of life (SF-36), and they scored in a 100-point rank questionnaire gynecological, urinary and gastrointestinal symptoms, pre-operatively and one-?year postoperatively.

Results: Significant improvements were observed in all domains of the SF-36 throughout the study period. Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and not menstrual pelvic pain showed a significant decrease 1?year after surgery. There was also a decrease in abdominal pain, rectal bleeding and constipation but not of nausea, abdominal pain, defecation pain, tenesmus, diarrhea, mucorrhea. Also some urinary symptoms did not improve.

Conclusions: The radical surgical approach has a positive impact on quality of life, although it does not improve all the symptoms complained before surgery. Clear pre-surgical counseling and careful patient selection is suggested.     

Successful laparoscopic treatment of ileo-cecal endometriosis producing bowel obstruction.

Bowel endometriosis manifesting with ileus is difficult to diagnose, often requiring laparotomy for diagnosis and treatment. We report here a case of ileo-cecal endometriosis causing bowel obstruction. A diagnosis of intestinal endometriosis with menstruation-associated bowel symptoms was made, and the patient was successfully treated by laparoscopic ileo-cecal resection.     

Systematic review of the outcome associated with the different surgical treatment of bowel and rectovaginal endometriosis

Background: Treatment of deep endometriosis involving the bowel is controversial. There is limitation of medical treatment. Several surgical techniques are used. All of them are associated with potential intraoperative complications and long-term hazards for the bladder, bowel and sexual function. Objectives: This study seeks to review systematically different types of surgical treatment of bowel endometriosis which include mucosal skinning (shaving), disc excision, and segmental resection. The review includes the number of participants, histology, symptomatology, preoperative assessment, types and access of surgery, complications, hospital stay, length and way of follow up, symptom improvement, recurrence, and effects on fertility. Study strategy: All published articles on surgical treatment of endometriosis (shaving, rectovaginal endometriosis, disc excision, and segmental resection), identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochran library during 1970–2011. Grey literatures were searched as well. Selection criteria: The terms ‘endometriosis’, ‘bowel’, surgical, and complications were used. Articles describing 50 patients or more who had bowel surgery for endometriosis were only included. Data collection and analysis: Data did not permit a meaningful meta-analysis. Main results: We analyzed 36 articles after thorough literature search. It described 2,414 of mucosal skinning/rectovaginal endometriosis, 381 of disc excision, and 2,728 of bowel resection for deep endometriosis involving the bowel. The indication for surgery was stated in most of the studies. Histology was confirmed in the majority; however, completeness of the excision was stated in few articles. There is significant improvement of symptoms with all types of surgery. Complications were higher in segmental resection than conservative surgery (shaving and disc excision) especially leakage and fistula formation. The duration of surgery and hospital stay was shorter in conservative surgery unless there were complications or if associated with other surgeries. Fertility outcome was favourable in all. The recurrence and reoperation rate was higher in one study only in the shaving group, but otherwise was comparable to the resection group. Conclusion: There was no difference in the outcome between different types of surgery which indicates that we should adopt the conservative surgery if possible. The heterogeneity of the studies makes it difficult to do any valuable statistical analysis. There should be standardization in clinical trials evaluating bowel surgery for endometriosis.     

Laparoscopic therapy of intestinal endometriosis and the ranking of drug treatment

Patients with severe endometriosis involving the rectovaginal septum and bowel makes surgery necessary. The laparoscopic approach offers the possibility to perform the complete resection with minimal invasive techniques. Small lesions can be removed by full-thickness-resection. Large nodules make a segmental resection necessary. Deep lesions are resected with stapling devices. Nodules in the sigmoid ore removed by laparoscopic assisted hand-sewn anastomosis. RESULTS: Between 3/96 and 7/03 142 patients with severe endometriosis involving the bowel have been treated laparoscopically. The pre-operative complains have been reduced as following: dyschezio: 88%, dyspareunia 87%, chronic pelvic pain 96%, disturbance of sexuality 75%. The complication rate was minimal: leakage of the anastomosis n=4 (2.8%), paraproctial abscess 2 (1.4%), blood transfusion 1 (0,7 %), severe stenosis of the anastomosis 6 (4.2%). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic approach is a safe and effective technique to treat deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel involvement. The hormonal treatment of bowel endometriosis is used in patients with minimal symptoms. The postoperative treatment becomes necessary in incomplete operations or in patients with severe adenomyosis and infertility.     

Surgical Principles for Disc Resection of Deep Bowel Endometriosis

ObjectiveColorectal involvement represents 90% of bowel endometriosis. The best surgical approach must consider the patient's clinical symptoms, preoperative imaging, and correlation with surgical findings. For patients with severe pain who either have failed medical treatment or contraindications to hormonal treatment and have a single bowel lesion <3 cm that involves the inner muscularis, disc resection is the preferred approach to treat bowel endometriosis 1, 2. Therefore, here we describe the surgical principles for disc resection for deep bowel endometriosis.DesignStep-by-step video illustration of our surgical technique with clarification of surgical principles.SettingTertiary care center.InterventionA mechanical bowel preparation is given before surgery. A 10-mm port is placed in the umbilicus, and 3 other 5-mm auxiliary ports are placed in the right and left iliac fossa and in the suprapubic region. Dissection starts with development of both medial pararectal spaces. The retrocervical region is approached, and the bowel lesion is isolated. A suture is placed into the endometriosis bowel lesion to facilitate invagination into the stapler. A circular stapler is inserted into the rectum, and the anvil is opened at the level of the endometriosis lesion. Each end of the suture held by 2 graspers are pushed dorsally, whereas the stapling device is gently pushed ventrally, imbricating the delineated area. The stapler is closed, including the endometriosis area. After reassuring that the posterior part of the mesentery is free, the device is fired, excising only the anterior wall of the rectum.ConclusionDisc resection is the technique of choice to treat a focal bowel endometriosis lesion <3 cm.     

Surgical management of rectovaginal septum endometriosis from a continuous series of 50 cases

OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of MRI and ano-rectal endosonography (ARES) for the diagnosis and surgical prognosis of rectovaginal septum endometriosis and to analyse the surgical management in order to evaluate its functional results and complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients operated for a clinical presumption of endometriosis nodule of the recto vaginal septum. Thirty-nine patients had a MRI, 31 an ARES and 28 both exams. All the patients had a complete dissection of the rectovaginal septum and all lesions were excised. RESULTS: For the diagnosis of rectovaginal septum endometriosis nodule, MRI results are: sensitivity 73%, specificity 50%, positive predictive value (PPV) 89%, negative predictive value (NPV) 25%; for uterosacral ligaments involvement: sensitivity 84%, specificity 95%, PPV 94%, NPV 86% and for rectal wall infiltration: sensitivity 53%, specificity 82%, PPV 69%, NPV 69%. The ARES results for diagnosis of rectovaginal septum endometriosis nodule are: sensitivity 93%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 50% and for rectal wall infiltration: sensitivity 100%, specificity 71%, PPV 81%, NPV 100%. ARES appeared more sensitive than MRI for the detection of rectal wall infiltration (P = 0.002) and for rectovaginal septum endometriosis nodule diagnosis (P = 0.03). Eighty-nine percent of the patients had a coelioscopy in first intention and 15 laparoconversions were performed, 11 in order to perform a digestive resection: 45 nodules were found. In 43cases the nodule was excised, associated to 19 digestive resections, 30 colpectomys, and 22 uterosacral ligaments resections. Three patients required an additional surgical treatment by Hartman's procedure with Mickulicz's drainage for peritonitis. Forty-one nodules were endometriosis nodules: the two other cases were fibrosis nodules. Thirty-three patients were interviewed about the evolution of their pains over a mean history of 20 months: 90% of the patients were satisfied with the management results. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the efficiency of MRI for rectovaginal septum endometriosis nodule and uterosacral ligaments involvement diagnosis; accord ARES to rectovaginal septum endometriosis nodule diagnosis and its reliability in establishing a diagnosis of rectal wall involvement. The surgical cure of rectovaginal septum nodules without digestive infiltration is performed by coelioscopic or coelio-vaginal procedure, but in case of associated digestive affliction, laparotomy is actually the standard procedure in order to achieve a complete cure of the lesions. Complications, in particular peritonitis, are not frequent. Our data support the efficiency of radical surgical treatment for the improvement of pain symptoms. Results on fertility seem to be satisfactory, but complication risks suggest being careful in this indication. Clinical examination during a catamenial period is essential in order to evoke the diagnosis. MRI yields a complete map of the sub-peritoneal and peritoneal lesions and ARES allows for the diagnosis of an infiltration of the rectal wall. Pre-operative association of those two exams is actually indispensable for the surgical management of those patients, which consists of complete excision of endometriosical lesions and is efficient at treating pain symptoms and fertility. Complications are rare but severe, therefore, justifying a cure in specialised centres.     

A New Technique of Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Anastomosis for Transrectal Bowel Resection With Transvaginal Specimen Extraction

Study ObjectiveTo show a new technique of laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for transrectal bowel resection with transvaginal specimen extraction, a technique particularly suited for treatment of bowel endometriosis.DesignStep-by-step explanation of the technique using videos and pictures (educative video).SettingEndometriosis may affect the bowel in 3% to 37% of all endometriosis cases. Bowel endometriosis affects young women, without any co-morbidities and in particular without any vascular disorders. In addition, affected patients often express a desire for childbearing. Radical excision is sometimes required because of the impossibility of conservative treatment such as shaving, mucosal skinning, or discoid resection. Bowel endometriosis should not be considered a cancer, and consequently maximal resection is not the objective. Rather, the goal would be to achieve functional benefit. As a result, resection must be as economic and cosmetic as possible. The laparoscopic approach has proved its superiority over the open technique, although mini-laparotomy is generally performed to prepare for the anastomosis.InterventionsTotal laparoscopic approach in patients with partial bowel stenosis, using the vagina for specimen extraction.ConclusionThis technique of intracorporeal anastomosis with transvaginal specimen extraction enables a smaller resection and avoidance of abdominal incision enlargement that may cause hernia, infection, or pain. When stenosis is partial, this technique seems particularly suited for treatment of bowel endometriosis requiring resection. If stenosis is complete, the anvil can be inserted above the lesion transvaginally.     

Robotic treatment of bowel endometriosis

Endometriosis describes a condition with the presence of ectopic endometrial glands and stroma outside the endometrial cavity that affects up to 15% of reproductive-aged women. Of women affected with endometriosis, 3.8–37% will have endometriosis involving the bowel, primarily the rectosigmoid colon. While medical management is often recommended as a first-line therapy, it is not curative, and surgery is often required as an adjunct for the management of symptoms. Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard of care for managing these patients. The use of robotic-assisted laparoscopy offers benefits that may allow surgeons to perform these challenging surgical cases using a minimally invasive technique. For lesions that affect the colon, there are three primary techniques used for removal which include: 1) rectal shaving, 2) discoid excision and 3) segmental resection. The decision to pursue one approach over another is largely dependent on the number of lesions present, a lesion's size and depth of invasion as well as the involved circumference of the bowel. The available evidence of using robotic-assisted laparoscopy in cases of bowel endometriosis is limited in the literature. In this review, we will summarize the role of robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the management of bowel endometriosis.