5-Aminosalicylic acid enemas in patients with active ulcerative colitis. Influence of acidity on the kinetic pattern

Enemas containing 1000 mg 5-ASA were administered to patients with active distal colitis in three separate studies: as a single dose in a neutral solution (pH 7.4); as a single dose in a slightly acidic, buffered suspension (pH 4.8); and as multiple doses once a day for 10 days with the acidic enema. 5-ASA was relatively rapidly absorbed from the neutral solution, resulting in plasma concentrations of 5-ASA sometimes two to three times higher than those found after peroral salazosulphapyridine (SASP) treatment. In contrast, absorption from the acidic enema was reduced and/or prolonged, giving plasma concentrations similar to those found during oral SASP treatment. After repeated doses of the acidic enema, plasma concentrations after an enema resembled those seen after the single dose. Urinary excretion was significantly lower, suggesting a reduced fraction of absorption at steady-state conditions. No side effects were observed, and no local irritation was reported. An acidic buffer suspension with 5-ASA seems to be safe for use as enema and deserves further clinical testing for treatment of distal ulcerative colitis.     

Optimum dosage of 5-aminosalicylic acid as rectal enemas in patients with active ulcerative colitis.

5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), the active moiety of sulphasalazine (SASP), was given as a rectal enema to patients with mild to moderate distal ulcerative colitis to determine the minimum effective dosage. A double blind study was carried out using enemas containing 1, 2, or 4 g or 5-ASA or placebo for a one month treatment period. One hundred and thirteen patients with ulcerative colitis attending our outpatient clinic volunteered to participate. Clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histological assessments were carried out at the beginning of the study and after 15 and 30 days of treatment. All patients who received 5-ASA enemas showed significantly better results than those who received a placebo enema (p less than 0.001) but no difference was detected among the patients receiving differing concentrations of 5-ASA. This study suggests that 1 g 5-ASA (in a 100 ml enema) is a sufficient dosage for patients with a mild to moderate attack of ulcerative colitis.     

Spread and distribution of 5-ASA colonic foam and 5-ASA enema in patients with ulcerative colitis

Rectal treatment with enemas, foams, and suppositories is the most efficient method of delivering an adequate quantity of locally active drugs to the distal colon. In a pilot study carried out by colonoscopy in four patients, it was observed that 4 g 5-ASA in 20 ml foam spread up or beyond the splenic flexure and more extensively than 2 g 5-ASA in 10 ml foam. Therefore we have undertaken a study in order to compare by scintigraphy the colonic distribution of 4 g 5-ASA foam versus 4 g 5-ASA in 100 ml liquid enemas in 10 patients with ulcerative colitis using a crossover randomized design. Both preparations were labeled with 100 MBq [^99mTc] sulfur colloid before administration. Anterior scans were taken at intervals for 4 hr. Activity, expressed as a percentage of total radioactivity, was measured in the rectum, sigmoid, descending, transverse, and ascending colon. Six patients had the same extent of spread with the two formulations; in three patients with foam and in one patient with enema a greater spread was observed. the foam reached the upper limit of disease in all cases, while enema failed in two cases. The maximum spread with foam was observed within 30 min in nine of 10 patients compared with seven of 10 after enema. Compared to enema, foam distributes more uniformly and seems to persist longer in the descending and sigmoid colon. The 5-ASA colonic foam shows some more favorable characteristics than enema for the local treatment of left-sided ulcerative colitis.This work was supported in part by Bracco S.p.A (Milan, Italy).Part of this study was presented at the 92th Annual Meeting of The American Gastrointestinal Association, May 18–24, 1991, in New Orleans, Louisiana.     

Steady-state kinetics of 5-aminosalicylic acid and sulfapyridine during sulfasalazine prophylaxis in ulcerative colitis

Fifteen adult and 19 pediatric outpatients with ulcerative colitis were studied to determine the steady-state kinetics of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) released from salazosulfapyridine (SASP). Results of excretion in adults (mean 24-h recovery of 5-ASA, 21% in urine and 57% in feces) were compatible with those of healthy volunteers. Since mean SASP dose/kg body weight (about 50 mg/kg) and compliance (reflected in sulfapyridine recovery) were equal in adults and pediatric patients, the results of the patient groups could be compared. Near-complete azo reduction of SASP occurs in children. Absorption and excretion of 5-ASA and metabolism to acetyl-5-ASA did not differ statistically between pediatric and adult patients. However, the fecal excretion of the drug and its metabolites was significantly lower in young patients, although fecal concentrations were the same. The present results demonstrate that SASP is an excellent sustained-release drug for the delivery of 5-ASA to the lower part of the bowel system and provide a reference for comparison of 5-ASA kinetics after treatment with newer 5-ASA preparations.     

Effect of polymer coating on faecal recovery of ingested 5-amino salicylic acid in patients with ulcerative colitis.

It has been suggested that polymer coating might retard jejunal absorption of 5-amino salicylic acid (5-ASA) and thus promote delivery to its colonic site of action. Twenty three patients with active (nine), or quiescent (14) ulcerative colitis were given either uncoated or coated 5-ASA (Asacol) 400 mg qds for one to three weeks, after which they ingested five 1.5 ml dialysis membrane sachets which were recovered from the stool in the next 72 hours. After one week of treatment the concentration of 5-ASA in the faecal dialysate, urine, and fasting plasma in those receiving the coated and uncoated preparations were respectively: 25.4 +/- 5.1 compared with 1.2 +/- 0.4 mmol/l (p less than 0.001); 0.34 +/- 0.21 compared with 0.70 +/- 0.29 mmol/24h (NS) and 11.1 +/- 4.2 compared with 0.07 +/- 0.03 mumol/l (p less than 0.02). Faecal excretion of the drug appeared to be greater in patients with active colitis than in those with quiescent disease. Thus coating with pH dependent methacrylic acid copolymer B is a very effective method of promoting delivery of 5-ASA to the colon, stool dialysate concentrations being 20 fold more than those in controls. Increased trough plasma concentrations in the polymer coating group probably reflect delayed intestinal absorption but no evidence of plasma accumulation after 21 days of therapy was found.     

Topical administration of 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas in patients with ulcerative colitis. Studies on rectal absorption and excretion.

5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is a new treatment for patients suffering from ulcerative colitis but only limited information is available about its rectal absorption. We therefore studied seven patients with ulcerative colitis in remission, and five with active disease to determine acetylated and free 5-ASA plasma concentrations and urinary acetyl 5-ASA after the administration of three different types of enemas: (2 g 5-ASA/100 ml, 4 g/100 ml, and 200 ml). In patients in remission urinary acetyl 5-ASA excretion was dose and volume dependent (p less than 0.01; p less than 0.05) but this correlation was absent in active disease. Because aminosalicylates are usually eliminated through the kidney, these low values (10% in active disease and 19% in those in remission) suggest that the beneficial action may be local. Urinary recovery was significantly lower in patients with active disease (p less than 0.01; p less than 0.02). No accumulation of 5-ASA was found in plasma after repeated daily administration.     

5-ASA and lycopene decrease the oxidative stress and inflammation induced by iron in rats with colitis

Background Supplementation of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and of iron are among the principal therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Therapeutic iron, as well as heme iron from chronic mucosal bleeding, can increase iron-mediated oxidative stress in colitis. This study was designed to examine the influence of iron supplementation on histological expression and oxidative status relative to 5-ASA treatment and antioxidant treatment.Methods Colitis was induced using the iodoacetamide rat model, and rats were divided into different dietary groups of 6 rats each: 1, normal chow diet (control); 2, diet supplemented with iron; 3, iron supplementation and lycopene; 4, iron and -carotene; 5, 5-ASA; 6, 5-ASA and lycopene; 7, 5-ASA and iron; 8, 5-ASA, iron, and lycopene. The animals were killed after 3 days and the weight of the ulcerated area recorded. Mucosal specimens were histologically evaluated. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) was measured to evaluate inflammatory status (U/g). Malondialdehyde (MDA) was measured in colonic tissue (µmol/g) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in erythrocytes to assess the degree of tissue oxidative stress.Results Significantly more severe colitis, including necrosis, ulceration, and hemorrhage, was seen in colonic biopsies of rats with colitis when iron was supplemented. This pathology was attenuated when iron was given in combination with 5-ASA and/or lycopene. There was no significant benefit from adding -carotene.Conclusions Iron supplementation can amplify the inflammatory response and subsequent mucosal damage in a rat model of colitis. We suggest that the resultant oxidative stress generated by iron supplementation leads to the extension and propagation of crypt abscesses, either through direct membrane disruption by lipid peroxidation or through the generation of secondary toxic oxidants. Simultaneous treatment with 5-ASA and/or lycopene minimizes the potential hazard of iron. Therefore, we suggest giving iron supplementation with 5-ASA or lycopene or both.     

Quantitative distribution of radiolabeled 5-Aminosalicylic acid enemas in patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis

Rectally administered suspensions of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) are topically effective in treating left-sided ulcerative colitis. The extent to which the contents of these enemas are distributed to inflamed mucosal linings has not previously been determined. This study was undertaken to validate a technique for labeling 5-ASA with^99mTc and to quantitate the distribution of [^99mTc]5-ASA in eight patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis. Eight patients underwent three colonic scintigraphic exams within five days, receiving a 60-ml radiolabeled 5-ASA enema into the unprepared rectum for each study, with sequential anterior abdominal images obtained for 4 hr. Activity within the rectum, sigmoid, descending, transverse, and ascending colon was quantitated. Over 50% of the labeled enema had advanced beyond the rectum in five of eight patients and in six of eight patients by 30 min and 60 min, respectively. The distribution of [^99mTc]5-ASA was quantitatively reproducible when repeated in the same patient on different days, despite apparent visual differences. By 2 hr, the amount of the enema present within the rectum decreased significantly (P<0.05) compared to the initial distribution. The amount of enema present within the descending colon was increased significantly at 0.5 hr (P< 0.05) and at 2 hr (P< 0.01). There were no significant changes in the distribution from initial values for the sigmoid, transverse, or ascending colon at any time. In each of these cases the spread of the enema to or beyond the extent of disease was documented. In patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis, small volume [^99mTc]5-ASA enemas reliably reach the area of inflammation.Supported by a grant from Reid-Rowell, Inc.     

Measurement of colonic mucosal concentrations of 5-aminosalicylic acid is useful for estimating its therapeutic efficacy in distal ulcerative colitis: comparison of orally administered mesalamine and sulfasalazine

OBJECTIVES: Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) preparations have been used frequently in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. However, there have been few reports investigating the relationship between colonic mucosal concentrations of 5-ASA and its clinical efficacy when oral sulfasalazine or 5-ASA compounds were administered. The aim of this study is to compare the mucosal concentrations of 5-ASA ensured by sulfasalazine or mesalamine, and to define the clinical significance of the measurement of 5-ASA concentrations in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biopsies were taken from the rectum and sigmoid colon of the oral sulfasalazine group (n = 13) and the slow-release 5-ASA (mesalamine) group with (n = 5) or without (n = 11) rectal administration of 5-ASA. High-pressure liquid chromatography was used to measure the tissue concentrations of 5-ASA and its metabolites. We compared the 5-ASA concentrations of the sulfasalazine group with the mesalamine group. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between tissue 5-ASA concentrations and the Disease Activity Index (DAI). RESULTS: The concentrations of 5-ASA and acetyl-5-ASA in the sulfasalazine group were higher than those in the group taking oral mesalamine alone (p < 0.01). The concentration of 5-ASA was much higher in the patients who received oral and rectal mesalamine in an enema than in the patients who had oral mesalamine alone. There was a significant inverse correlation between the DAI and concentrations of 5-ASA in the rectum (r = 0.712, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the colonic mucosal concentration of 5-ASA was significantly higher in the sulfasalazine group than in the mesalamine group. Furthermore, the concentrations of mucosal 5-ASA may be a good marker for the estimation of its efficacy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.     

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of a new 4-gram 5-aminosalicylic acid retention enema in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission.

The pharmacokinetic profile of a new 4-g 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-ASA) retention enema, Mesasal, was investigated. Nine patients with ulcerative colitis in remission and one patient with mild disease activity received one enema for seven consecutive nights. They were admitted to hospital for administration of the eighth enema. Plasma concentration and urinary excretion of 5-ASA and acetyl-5-aminosalicyclic acid (Ac-5-ASA) were studied for 45 h and faecal excretion for 24 h after administration of the last enema. The median peak plasma concentration of 5-ASA was 0.92 (range, 0.59-1.87) micrograms/ml at a median of 11 h after administration, and of Ac-5-ASA 1.62 (range, 1.03-4.36) micrograms/ml at a median of 12 h after administration. On average, the plasma concentration of Ac-5-ASA was almost twice that of 5-ASA at each sampling period. At 24 h after administration the median plasma concentration for 5-ASA was 0.12 (range, 0-0.77) micrograms/ml and for Ac-5-ASA 0.36 (range, 0.01-1.6) micrograms/ml. At 45 h after administration low levels of both 5-ASA (less than 0.2 micrograms/ml) and Ac-5-ASA (less than 0.3 microgram/ml) were noted in two patients, low levels of only Ac-5-ASA (less than 0.1 microgram/ml) in two patients, and neither 5-ASA nor Ac-5-ASA in the other six patients. All patients had detectable urinary levels of both 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA during the first 4 h after administration. Median urinary recovery during 45 h was 12.6% (range, 5.6-22.2%), indicating a low absorption at steady-state conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

5-Aminosalicylic Acid Enemas in Refractory Distal Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), the presumed active moiety of sulfasalazine, has shown clinical efficacy when administered per rectum as initial therapy to patients with distal ulcerative colitis. We report the results of a randomized double-blind trial comparing nightly retention of a 4-g 5-ASA enema with continued administration of hydrocortisone enemas in 18 patients with persistent active distal ulcerative colitis after at least a 3-wk course of treatment with 100-mg hydrocortisone enemas with or without oral sulfasalazine. Continuation of hydrocortisone enemas rather than placebo was used in the control group to reflect the realistic alternative therapy likely to be employed in current practice. Response to therapy was assessed after 3 wk by comparing pretreatment and posttreatment point scores of clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histological severity. Improvement in clinical score was achieved in seven of nine 5-ASA enema-treated patients versus one of nine hydrocortisone enema-treated patients (p less than 0.05). Sigmoidoscopic and histological improvement generally paralleled clinical improvement. We conclude that in patients with distal ulcerative colitis unresponsive to standard therapy, treatment with 5-ASA enemas results in significant short-term clinical and sigmoidoscopic improvement in a majority of cases. Moreover, a significantly greater number of refractory patients improve when switched to 5-ASA enemas than when continued on standard therapy.     

Better quality of therapy with 5-ASA colonic foam in active ulcerative colitis

We evaluated the efficacy, tolerance, and acceptance of a new 5-ASA colonic foam versus 5-ASA liquid enema in the short-term treatment of active ulcerative colitis in a three-week prospective, randomized, investigator-blind study, enrolling 233 patients from 12 outpatient clinics in Italy. In arm 1 of the study, 117 patients with mild attacks received 2 g of 5-ASA as foam or enema at bedtime. In arm 2, 116 patients with moderate attacks were given 4 g of 5-ASA as foam or enema at bedtime. End points were defined as complete relief of symptoms, and endoscopic and histological evidence of remission or improvement. In patients with mild relapse, 34 of 63 (54%) treated with foam were in clinical remission after only 10 days compared with 17 of 51 (31%) treated with enemas (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between foam (83%) and enema (74%) after three weeks. In patients with moderate relapse, a higher proportion of patients achieved complete clinical remission in the foam group (63%) compared with enema group (52%) after three weeks (difference 11%, 95% CI –7 to 29). No significant differences were observed in endoscopic and histological evaluation of colonic mucosa between treatment groups in either arm. 5-ASA foam was well tolerated. No unexpected adverse events were reported. Patient evaluation of therapy showed that foam was much better accepted than enema because foam was more comfortable, more practical, easier to retain, and interfered less with daily living. The results of this study suggest that 5-ASA foam may provide prompter remission of symptoms compared to liquid enema and it improves the quality of topical therapy in ulcerative colitis.This paper was presented in part at the Research Forum of the 92nd annual meeting of The American Gastrointestinal Association, New Orleans, May 18–24, 1991.The multicenter group included: M. Campieri, A. Belluzzi, G. Brunetti, P. Gionchetti, M. Miglioli, L. Barbara (Bologna); C. Prantera, A. Andreoli, E. Berto (Roma); P. Paoluzi, M.C. Di Paolo, A.O. Paoluzi (Roma); F. Pallone, F. Luzza (Catanzaro); M. Cottone, L. Oliva (Palermo); G. Bianchi Porro, S. Ardizzone, M. Petrillo (Milano); G. D'Albasio, G. Trallori (Firenze); G.C. Sturniolo, M.C. Montino (Padova); A. Pera, C. Barletti (Torino); R. de Franchis, G. Grandinetti, G.M. Meucci, M. Vecchi (Milano); P. Bianchi, M.C. Campanini, T. Ranzi (Milano); L. Capurso, C. Papi (Roma).Supported by a grant from Bracco and Giuliani (Milan, Italy).     

5-Aminosalicylic acid suppositories in the management of ulcerative colitis

5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) suppositories have been used in the author's out-patient clinic in Bologna for the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis (UC). One hundred fifty-six patients with mild or moderate attacks of UC were treated using different protocols for controlling active disease. Improvement was observed in 88.5 percent of the therapeutic cycles after one month. A small preliminary maintenance study using only 400-mg suppositories of 5-ASA twice a day for 6 or 12 months showed a remission percentage similar to salicylazosulfapyridine (SASP).     

Therapeutic efficacy of 5-ASA molecules in idiopathic intestinal inflammatory diseases: critical review]

Sulfasalazine has been the most widely prescribed drug for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Clinical trials have established its usefulness in treating patients with active ulcerative colitis and Crohn colitis and its important role in maintaining remissions in patients with ulcerative colitis. Despite its widespread acceptance, the usefulness of sulfasalazine has been limited by the occurrence of adverse reactions in about 10 to 20% of the patients. Now the aminosalicylates are emerging as a treatment for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease. We have critically reviewed the clinical trials assessing the efficacy of 5-ASA molecules. Therapeutic efficacy of 5-ASA appears to be as good as sulfasalazine but causing less adverse effects. In mild to moderate ulcerative colitis relapse, 2g 5-ASA is active while 1 g 5-ASA seems equivalent to 2g sulfasalazine for maintaining remission. 5-ASA enema in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis is helpful and can replace topical cortisone administration. Administration of 1g 5-ASA enema a day seems to be the best regimen. In case of Crohn's disease, preliminary studies are encouraging but more date are required to define the indications as well as the regimen.     

Management of distal ulcerative colitis: frequently asked questions analysis

The majority of patients with ulcerative colitis have disease involving only the distal colon. Although 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA, mesalazine) and corticosteroids remain the important drugs used in the management of distal colitis and proctitis, recent expansion of delivery options of 5-ASA and high level evidence regarding efficacy have led to a shift in treatment strategies. The availability of 5-ASA in enema, foam and suppository formulations has enabled optimization of delivery of 5-ASA to the affected mucosa. Such therapy has superior efficacy and fewer adverse effects compared with those of topical corticosteroids. Furthermore, rectal delivery is effective in the maintenance of remission. Consequently, new guidelines for the management of distal colitis have focussed more on rectal delivery and on optimizing 5-ASA dosage than previously. However, corticosteroids remain an important remission-inducing agent, and immune-modulating drugs play a clear role in prevention of relapse and in managing chronically active disease. The changes in guidelines have raised several management questions, many of which are addressed in this review.     

Rebamipide enema is effective for treatment of experimental dextran sulfate sodium induced colitis in rats

We investigated therapeutic efficacy of rebamipide using dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) induced colitis model in rats. Three percent DSS solution was given to rats for 9 days. After that, we evaluated the drug efficacy on colitis sustained with continuous drinking of 1% DSS. Twice-daily treatment with 0.3% or 1% rebamipide for 14 days significantly ameliorated the stool abnormality in the colitis model, preferentially suppressed hematochezia. The colonic mucosal lesion, determined by Alcian blue staining on day 24, was significantly reduced by rebamipide enema in a dose-dependent manner. Either rebamipide or 5-aminosalycilic acid (5-ASA) enema treated once daily significantly ameliorated colitis. The minimum effective dose of rebamipide was 0.3% in once-daily treatment, and that of 5-ASA was 10%. In a mechanistic study, the epithelial cell sheet formation of the T84 colon cancer cell was measured as an increase in generation of trans-epithelial electrical resistance in vitro. Rebamipide accelerated the increase, while 5-ASA conversely suppressed it. These results suggest that rebamipide enema is effective for treatment of experimental ulcerative colitis (UC).     

Rebamipide Enema is Effective for Treatment of Experimental Dextran Sulfate Sodium Induced Colitis in Rats

We investigated therapeutic efficacy of rebamipide using dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) induced colitis model in rats. Three percent DSS solution was given to rats for 9 days. After that, we evaluated the drug efficacy on colitis sustained with continuous drinking of 1% DSS. Twice-daily treatment with 0.3% or 1% rebamipide for 14 days significantly ameliorated the stool abnormality in the colitis model, preferentially suppressed hematochezia. The colonic mucosal lesion, determined by Alcian blue staining on day 24, was significantly reduced by rebamipide enema in a dose-dependent manner. Either rebamipide or 5-aminosalycilic acid (5-ASA) enema treated once daily significantly ameliorated colitis. The minimum effective dose of rebamipide was 0.3% in once-daily treatment, and that of 5-ASA was 10%. In a mechanistic study, the epithelial cell sheet formation of the T84 colon cancer cell was measured as an increase in generation of trans-epithelial electrical resistance in vitro. Rebamipide accelerated the increase, while 5-ASA conversely suppressed it. These results suggest that rebamipide enema is effective for treatment of experimental ulcerative colitis (UC).     

Renal effects of long-term treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid

BACKGROUND:

A number of case reports link the use of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) to interstitial nephritis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate whether the long-term use of 5-ASA has harmful effects on renal function in patients with IBD.

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of 171 consecutive outpatients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis was conducted. Serum creati-nine levels and body weight were measured before and after treatment to calculate the creatinine clearance (CrCl) rate.

RESULTS:

In 171 patients (93 women, 78 men), the mean (± SD) dose of 5-ASA was 3.65±0.85 g/day with a cumulative dose of 11±7.7 kg over an interval of 8.4±5.9 years. Serum creatinine concentrations increased from 76.8 μmol/L to 88.7 μmol/L (n=171; P<0.0001) and the CrCl rate fell significantly from 104.6 mL/min to 93.1 mL/min (n=81; P<0.0001). There was one case of interstitial nephritis reported. Treatment groups included mesalamine (74.3%), sulfasalazine (15.2%) and combination (sulfalsalazine/mesalamine [10.5%]) with treatment durations of 7.2±4.5, 12.3±8.7 and 11.2±6.7 years, respectively. The duration of treatment was the most important covariate for change in CrCl and when analyzed by treatment group, those treated with sulfasazine had a strong correlation (r=−0.54, P=0.0145), while nonsignificant in the mesalamine group (r=0.06, P=0.7017). The decline in CrCl was negatively correlated with the pretreatment CrCl rate (r=−0.34; P=0.0024) and positively correlated with the mean daily dose of 5-ASA (r=0.32; P=0.0034).

CONCLUSION:

The present study is the first to demonstrate a significant dose- and treatment duration-dependant decline in CrCl. The risks need to be further evaluated because 5-ASA is widely used for long-term maintenance therapy in patients with IBD.     

Failure of 5-Aminosalicylic acid enemas to improve chronic radiation proctitis

Radiation proctitis is a well-known complication of abdominal and pelvic radiation. Conventional medical and surgical treatment often is disappointing. 5-Aminosalicylic Acid (5-ASA)is the active component in sulfasalazine and is effective in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis. Four patients with radiation proctitis were treated with 4 g 5-ASA by enema nightly for two to six months. Patients were seen monthly, interviewed, and a sigmoidoscopic exam performed. No change was seen in the degree of mucosal inflammation on follow-up sigmoidoscopic exams. Three patients noted no change in their symptoms of bleeding, pain, or tenesmus. One patient noted initial improvement, but this was not sustained. 5-ASA enemas do not appear to be effective in the treatment of radiation proctitis.     

Increased levels of circulating platelet derived microparticles in Crohn's disease patients

Objective: Platelet activation is a consistent feature in inflammatory bowel disease. However, the role of circulating platelet derived microparticles (PDMPs) and the effects of disease activity and treatment on their levels has not been clarified yet in this disorder.

Material and methods: Using flow cytometry, we measured platelet derived microparticles and platelet derived microparticles expressing Annexin V in platelet rich plasma from 47 Crohn’s disease and 43 ulcerative colitis patients and 24 healthy controls.

Results: Crohn’s disease patients have greater PDMPs (0.31% ± 0.07% versus 0.14% ± 0.04%, p?=?0.02) and PDMPs expressing Annexin V (27% ± 2.6% versus 14.6% ± 2.7%, p?=?0.002) levels in comparison with healthy controls; however, both microparticles levels are not related with disease activity. Crohn’s disease patients on 5-ASA therapy show lower levels of PDMPs in comparison with those on no 5-ASA (0.30% ± 0.07% versus 0.32% ± 0.09%, p?=?0.048). Ulcerative colitis patients have similar PDMPs and PDMPs expressing Annexin V levels, compared to healthy controls (p?=?0.06 and p?=?0.2, respectively) and there is no correlation of both microparticles expression with disease activity. 5-ASA has no effect on both microparticles levels in ulcerative colitis patients. Anti-TNF-α treatment has no effect on study’s microparticles expression in Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis patients.

Conclusions: Circulating levels of platelet derived microparticles are increased only in Crohn’s patients, but they do not correlate with disease activity. 5-ASA treatment is associated with lower levels of PDMPs only in Crohn’s, while anti-TNF-α treatment does not influence expression of microparticles in inflammatory bowel disease patients.