The effect of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on H. pylori eradication rate in dual and triple first-line PPI therapies: a meta-analysis

PREMISE: It has been suggested that proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-related differences in Helicobacter pylori eradication rates are partly because of CYP2C19 polymorphisms and there have been conflicting data in this area. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the evidence relating CYP2C19 to first-line H. pylori eradication rates. METHODS: A search of the literature was conducted up to June 2005 using Medline, EMBase, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Twenty-eight arms from 17 papers were extracted for omeprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole, collectively. Review Manager 4.2.8 was used for analysis. RESULTS: When all eradication rates, regardless of PPI used, were combined there was no significant difference between poor metabolizers (PM) and heterozygous extensive metabolizers (HetEMs) (odds ratio [OR]= 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-2.07, p = 0.15); however, there was a significant difference between HetEM and homozygous extensive metabolizers (HomEMs) (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.38-2.60, p < 0.0001). Significant heterogeneity was observed in a HomEM and PM comparison, hence additional subanalysis of individual PPIs revealed that dual and triple omeprazole therapies significantly favored higher H. pylori eradication rates in PM over HomEM (OR = 4.03, 95% CI 1.97-8.28, p = 0.0001), and also over HetEM (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.09-4.61, p = 0.03). Dual and triple rabeprazole and triple lansoprazole therapies did not show significantly different H. pylori eradication rates between PM and HomEM (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.44-2.46, p = 0.25) and (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 0.67-4.85, p = 0.93), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on H. pylori eradication rates in studied populations appears clinically relevant in patients prescribed omeprazole as a component of their dual- or triple-drug therapy, whereas regimens that include lansoprazole or rabeprazole are unaffected. The choice of PPI and/or dose rather than CYP2C19 genotyping could be a more practical approach to assure the highest H. pylori eradication rates in clinical settings.     

One week of treatment with esomeprazole-based triple therapy eradicates Helicobacter pylori and heals patients with duodenal ulcer disease.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) monotherapy is commonly continued for 3 weeks after Helicobacter pylori eradication with PPI-based triple therapy regimens to ensure duodenal ulcer (DU) healing. This randomized, double-blind, multicentre study evaluated whether only 1 week of triple therapy with the new PPI esomeprazole was sufficient to ensure high rates of ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication. METHODS: A total of 446 H. pylori-positive patients with active DU received twice daily treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg (n = 222) or omeprazole 20 mg (n = 224) in combination with amoxicillin 1 g and clarithromycin 500 mg for 1 week (EAC and OAC, respectively). Patients in the OAC group then received 3 weeks' monotherapy with omeprazole 20 mg once daily; those treated with EAC received placebo. Ulcer healing was assessed by endoscopy on completion of therapy and H. pylori status was assessed by (13)C-urea breath testing and histology 4-6 weeks later. RESULTS: Ulcer healing rates (95% CI) for intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations were: EAC + placebo 91% (87-95%) and 94% (90-97%); OAC + omeprazole 92% (88-95%) and 96% (92-98%). Corresponding H. pylori eradication rates were: EAC + placebo 86% (81-90%) and 89% (84-93%); OAC + omeprazole 88% (83-92%) and 90% (85-93%). Both eradication regimens were well tolerated, and patient compliance was high. CONCLUSIONS: A 1-week regimen of esomeprazole-based triple therapy is sufficient for DU healing and H. pylori eradication in patients with DU disease.     

Randomized open trial for comparison of proton pump inhibitors in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in relation to CYP2C19 genotype

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 influences the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and amoxicillin. However, in triple therapy (PPI plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin), little is known about the impact of CYP2C19 polymorphism, or the use of rabeprazole, which is not well metabolized by CYP2C19. The efficacy of three PPI (omeprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole) in a 1-week triple regimen were compared in relation to CYP2C19 polymorphism. METHOD: One hundred and eighty-three patients were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: amoxicillin 500 mg t.i.d., clarithromycin 200 mg t.i.d., and PPI (omeprazole 20 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, or rabeprazole 10 mg) b.i.d. CYP2C19 polymorphism was analyzed by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat-based overall cure rates for omeprazole, lansoprazole or rabeprazole regimens were 83.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 69-89%), 86.7% (CI: 75-93%), and 76.6% (CI: 64-85%), respectively, without significant difference. The cure rate of the rabeprazole regimen (but not the lansoprazole or omeprazole regimens) tended to be correlated with CYP2C19 genotypes (P = 0.076). In patients with a homozygous extensive metabolizer genotype, the per protocol-based cure rate with rabeprazole (62.5%) was significantly lower than that with lansoprazole (90.0%; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: The overall cure rate of 1-week triple therapy for H. pylori eradication was not significantly different between regimens with omeprazole, lansoprazole or rabeprazole, but the impact of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on the cure rate appeared to differ between these PPI.     

Quadruple therapy with lactoferrin for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomised, multicentre study

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rate with standard triple therapies is decreasing. Recently, lactoferrin administration has been shown to significantly increase the cure rate of 7-day rabeprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole triple therapy. We assessed whether lactoferrin also increases the eradication rate of 7-day esomeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxycillin triple therapy as first-line treatment. METHODS: Overall, 133 consecutive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomised to receive either a standard 7-day triple therapy with esomeprazole 20mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. and amoxycillin 1g b.i.d. (68 patients) or a quadruple therapy comprising of the same regimen plus lactoferrin 200mg b.i.d. (65 patients). H. pylori at entry was assessed by endoscopy, while bacterial eradication was checked by (13)C urea breath test 4-6 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication following standard triple therapy was achieved in 53/68 (77.9%; 95% CI = 68-88) and in 53/66 (80.3%; 95% CI = 71-89) patients at ITT and PP analyses, respectively. Following the quadruple regimen, the infection was cured in 50/65 (76.9%; 95% CI = 67-87) and 50/64 (78.1%; 95% CI = 68-88) patients at ITT and PP analyses, respectively. No statistically significant difference emerged between the two therapeutic regimens, both at ITT (p = 0.9) and PP analyses (p = 0.9). Side effects were complained by seven (10.3%) patients and six (9.2%) patients following the triple and quadruple regimens, respectively (p = 0.9), with only one patient in the quadruple group interrupting the treatment due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Quadruple therapy with lactoferrin did not significantly increase the H. pylori cure rate of standard 7-day clarithromycin-amoxycillin based triple therapy in non-ulcer dyspepsia patients.     

雷贝拉唑与兰索拉唑对幽门螺杆菌阳性的消化性溃疡患者安全性与有效性的Meta分析

目的 比较雷贝拉唑与兰索拉唑对根除幽门螺杆菌阳性消化性溃疡患者的安全性与有效性.方法 计算机检索PubMed、EMbase、CNKI、万方数据库和维普数据库查找所有比较雷贝拉唑和兰索拉唑根除幽门螺杆菌阳性消化性溃疡的随机对照试验,检索时间为建库到2014年1月24日.按照纳入及排除标准由两名系统性评价员独立进行随机对照试验的筛选,资料提取和质量评价后采用RevMan 5.2软件进行Meta分析.结果 纳入9个研究,共1 421例患者.安全性方面,雷贝拉唑与兰索拉唑不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义[OR=1.10,95％ CI（0.71～1.71）,P＞0.05];药物依从性方面,雷贝拉唑与兰索拉唑比较,差异无统计学意义[R=0.51,95％CI（0.13 ～1.92）,P＞0.05];有效性方面,雷贝拉唑对幽门螺杆菌根除率优于兰索拉唑,差异有统计学意义[OR=0.65,95％ CI（0.47 ～0.88）P ＜0.01],.雷贝拉唑对溃疡愈合率亦优于兰索拉唑,差异有统计学意义[OR =0.36,95％ CI（0.20～0.65）,P＜0.01].结论 雷贝拉唑有效性优于兰索拉唑,且安全性上无差异.因原始研究的质量高低不一,建议临床上谨慎选择使用,需要更多的大样本多中心的随机对照试验进一步论证.     

CYP2C19基因多态性对亚洲人群中含质子泵抑制剂三联疗法幽门螺杆菌根除率影响的荟萃分析

以质子泵抑制剂（PPI）为基础的三联疗法的幽门螺杆菌（H．pylori）根除率不尽相同，可能与细胞色素P450（CYP）2C19基因多态性有部分关联。目的：研究CYP2C19基因多态性对亚洲人群中以PPI为基础的三联疗法H．pylori根除率的影响。方法：在PubMed、EMBASE、CNKI和万方数据中进行系统文献检索，以RevMan4．2．8软件行荟萃分析。结果：共17篇文献纳入荟萃分析。不考虑PPI类型，CYP2C19弱代谢型（PM）与杂合子强代谢型（HetEM）之间、PM与纯合子强代谢型（HomEM）之间、HetEM与HomEM之间H．pylori根除率均有显著差异（PM对HetEM：OR=1．75，95％CI1．24—2．47．舟0．002；PM对HomEM：OR=2．82，95％CI1．73～4．60，P〈0．0001；HetEM对HomEM：OR=1．84，95％CI1．33-2．57，P=-0．0003）。在以奥美拉唑或兰索拉唑为基础的三联疗法中，PM与HomEM之间、HetEM与HomEM之间且pylori根除率均有显著差异（含奥美拉唑方案PM对HomEM：OR=4．37，95％CI1．86—10．26．P=0．0007，HetEM对HomEM：OR=3．15,95％CI1．75—5．66，P=0．0001；含兰索拉唑方案PM对HomEM：OR=3．06．95％CI1．56-6．00。P=0．001。HetEM对HomEM：OR=1．95，95％CI1．03～3．70，P=0．04）。在以雷贝拉唑为基础的三联疗法中，PM、HetEM、HomEM三组间H．pylori根除率均无明显差异。结论：在亚洲人群中，以奥美拉唑和兰索拉唑为基础的三联疗法．其H．pylori根除率受CYP2C19基因多态性影响，以雷贝拉唑为基础的三联疗法则否。     

Pantoprazole based therapies in Helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To perform a systematic review on the efficacy of pantoprazole based therapies in Helicobacter pylori eradication, and to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of pantoprazole and other proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) when co-prescribed with antibiotics. METHODS: Studies evaluating pantoprazole combined with antibiotics were considered. Only randomized clinical trials comparing pantoprazole and other PPIs when co-prescribed with antibiotics, and differing only in the PPI (pantoprazole vs other), were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Bibliographical searches in several electronic databases, and manual search of abstracts from congresses, were conducted. The percentage (weighted mean) of patients with eradication success was calculated. Meta-analysis was performed combining the odds ratios (ORs) of the individual studies in a global OR. RESULTS: The mean eradication rate with pantoprazole plus clarithromycin for 14 days was 60%. Cure rates with 7 day pantoprazole based triple regimens were higher: pantoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin (78%); pantoprazole, clarithromycin and nitroimidazole (84%); and pantoprazole, amoxicillin and nitroimidazole (74%). Twelve studies comparing pantoprazole and other PPIs were selected for the meta-analysis, including 534 and 603 patients, respectively. The mean eradication rate for H. pylori using pantoprazole plus antibiotics was 83%, and 81% when other PPIs were used (OR = 1; 95% confidence interval (CI) from 0.61 to 1.64). When sub-analysis was performed, including only studies comparing pantoprazole with omeprazole, or pantoprazole with lansoprazole, differences were also statistically non-significant. The meta-analysis of the six studies prescribing equivalent doses of all PPIs demonstrated similar results with pantoprazole and with other PPIs (OR = 1.07; 95% CI from 0.71 to 1.62), the results being statistically homogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: Pantoprazole achieves similar cure rates to those of omeprazole and lansoprazole when co-prescribed with antibiotics for the eradication of H. pylori infection.     

A randomized open trial for comparison of proton pump inhibitors, omeprazole versus rabeprazole, in dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in relation to CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 has been shown to influence the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and amoxicillin (so-called dual therapy). Omeprazole, a widely used PPI, and rabeprazole, a new PPI, are metabolized in different pathways in terms of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms. In this study, we compared the efficacy of omeprazole and rabeprazole in a 2-week dual therapy in relation to CYP2C19 polymorphism. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-nine patients with peptic ulcer disease were randomly assigned to receive one of the following regimens: 500 mg t.i.d. amoxicillin together with either 20 mg b.i.d. omeprazole or 10 mg b.i.d rabeprazole. The eradication of H. pylori was evaluated by using a bacterial culture and a [(13)C]-urea breath test at 1--2 months after completion of treatment. Cytochrome P4502C19 polymorphism was analyzed by using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat-based cure rates for the omeprazole or rabeprazole regimens were 66.3% (95% CI, 56--75) and 62.4% (95% CI, 52--71), respectively, without significant difference. Cytochrome P4502C19 genetic polymorphism did not influence the cure rates in either of these regimens. We analyzed various factors associated with treatment failure (PPI, CYP2C19 genotype, and smoking habit) by using multiple logistic regression; smoking was the only significant independent factor for treatment failure. CONCLUSION: Omeprazole and rabeprazole were equally effective in combination with amoxicillin in eradicating H. pylori, irrespective of the PPI used (omeprazole or rabeprazole) and CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism. Smoking significantly decreased the cure rate of H. pylori infection in the dual therapy.     

Randomized trial of a quadruple-drug regimen and a triple-drug regimen for eradication of Helicobacter pylori: long-term follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: In developing countries, H. pylori eradication rates are suboptimal. A quadruple-drug regimen may improve on the eradication rate achieved with triple-drug regimen. METHODS: 64 consecutive patients with active duodenal ulcer associated with H. pylori infection were randomized to receive either a one-week triple-drug regimen (lansoprazole, clarithromycin, secnidazole) or a one-week quadruple-drug regimen (lansoprazole, amoxycillin, colloidal bismuth subcitrate, secnidazole). H. pylori eradication and ulcer healing were assessed 4 weeks after completion of therapy. Patients were followed up at 24 weeks and 52 weeks for H. pylori recurrence. RESULTS: Both the regimens eradicated H. pylori in 75% (95% CI 0.6-0.9) of patients. The ulcer-healing rate with the triple-drug regimen was 97% (95% CI 0.91-1.0) and 91% (95% CI 0.91-1.0) with the quadruple-drug regimen. No ulcer or H. pylori recurrence occurred in patients eradicated with the triple-drug regimen, whereas 8.3% of patients eradicated with the quadruple-drug regimen had ulcer as well as H. pylori recurrence during the 52-week follow up. CONCLUSION: Triple-drug regimen achieves similar eradication rates as quadruple-drug regimen in H. pylori infection.     

Interleukin-1beta genetic polymorphism influences the effect of cytochrome P 2C19 genotype on the cure rate of 1-week triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

OBJECTIVES: Genetic polymorphism of interleukin (IL)-1beta is associated with differences in gastric acid suppression in response to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. Thus, the polymorphism might affect H. pylori eradication therapy, as antibiotics used in treatment regimens may be acid sensitive. In this study, we examined the impact of IL-1beta genetic polymorphism on the cure rate of triple therapy for H. pylori in relation to cytochrome P (CYP) 2C19 genotype and antibiotic resistance. METHODS: A total 249 patients with peptic ulcer disease were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: amoxicillin and clarithromycin together with omeprazole, lansoprazole, or rabeprazole. CYP2C19 and IL-1beta-511 genetic polymorphisms were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat-based overall cure rate was 74.3% (95% CI=68-79%). In the normal acid secretion IL-1beta genotype group, the cure rate among CYP2C19 poor metabolizers (93.3%, 95% CI=56-99%) was significantly higher than among subjects in the CYP2C19 homozygous (60.0%, 95% CI=38-78%) and heterozygous (63.6%, 95% CI=46-78%), i.e., extensive metabolizer, groups (p<0.05). In the low acid secretion IL-1beta genotype group, there was no difference in the cure rate among the CYP2C19 genotype groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified susceptibility to clarithromycin (p<0.0001) and CYP2C19 genotype status (p=0.03) as significant independent factors for treatment failure. CONCLUSION: IL-1beta genetic polymorphism, although not an independent factor in treatment outcome, influences the impact of the CYP2C19 genotype on the cure rate of 1-wk triple therapy for H. pylori infection.     

以埃索美拉唑和奥美拉唑为基础的三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效的荟萃分析

目的对以埃索美拉唑和奥美拉唑为基础的1周三联疗法根治幽门螺杆菌的疗效进行系统性分析。方法联机检索从Medline数据库(2000年~2005年)、维普(2000~2005年)、万方数据库(2000~2005年)中检索埃索美拉唑与奥美拉唑为基础的三联疗法对根治幽门螺杆菌疗效的随机对照临床试验。对各项研究中疗效的比值比(OR)进行荟萃分析,采用Mantel-Haesul方法。结果共有7项研究符合入选标准。荟萃结果表明以埃索美拉唑为基础的1周标准三联疗法对幽门螺杆菌的根治疗效和以奥美拉唑为基础的标准三联疗法疗效相似[OR(95%CI):1·2746(0·8835,1·8388)]。结论埃索美拉唑作为奥美拉唑的光学异构体,以其为基础的1周三联疗法能有效地根治幽门螺杆菌,疗效相似于奥美拉唑。     

One-week once-daily triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori--a pilot study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proton-pump inhibitor-based triple therapy given over one to two weeks is currently one of the recommended regimens for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Most of these regimens require twice daily intake of medication. The present study explored the possibility of using a one-week once-daily triple therapy in the eradication of H. pylori. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-two consecutive patients with acid-peptic disease associated with H. pylori infection (duodenal ulcer 18 patients; gastric ulcer 8 patients; duodenitis 1 patient; gastritis 5 patients) were prospectively recruited. They were given a 1-week course of lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin modified-release 500 mg, and metronidazole 800 mg, all taken once daily. RESULTS: The age of these 32 patients ranged from 17-89 years with a mean of 57.5 years. Side effects occurred in 5 patients (15.6%; 95% CI: 5.3-32.8%). All patients finished the treatment and underwent a second endoscopy. Positive endoscopic finding was found in one patient (3.1%; 95% CI: 0.07-16.2%). On intent-to-treat and per protocol analysis, the eradication rate was 87.5% (95% CI: 71.0-96.5%). CONCLUSIONS: A one-week once-daily course of lansoprazole, clarithromycin modified release and metronidazole is a safe, well-tolerated, easy to comply with, and efficacious treatment for H. pylori infection. In view of the small sample size, further studies should be performed to validate its effectiveness.     

细胞色素P450 2C19基因多态性对埃索美拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效的影响

目的 前瞻性对比埃索美拉唑和奥美拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌(Hp)的疗效,及细胞色素P450(CYP)2C19基因多态性对根除Hp疗效的影响.方法 240例Hp阳性消化性溃疡患者,随机分为EAC组(埃索美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素)和OAC组(奥美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素),每组120例,疗程7 d.继后埃索美拉唑或奥美拉唑巩固治疗3周.胃镜观察2周溃疡愈合情况,结束治疗4周后进行13C尿素呼气试验.利用聚合酶链反应(PCR)及限制片段长度多态性(RFLP)分析技术,测定所有患者的CYP2C19基因型,分为强代谢型(Ems)和弱代谢型(PMs),强代谢型包括纯合子(homEM)和杂合子(hetEM).结果 240例患者中225例完成疗效观察.Hp根除率按意向处理分析(ITT),EAC组为88.3%,OAC组为79.2%(P>0.05);按方案分析(PP)EAC组为91.4%,OAC组为87.2 oA(P>0.05).ITT分析显示,在CYP2C19 homEM基因型中,EAC和OAC组Hp根除率分别为91.9%和71.8%,两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.037).PP分析显示,在homEM基因型中,EAC组和OAC组Hp根除率分别为97.1%和77.8%,两组间差异也有统计学意义(P=0.028).ITT分析显示,EAC组和OAC组2周溃疡愈合率分别为79.2%和69.2%(P>0.05);PP分析显示分别为81.9%和76.1%(P>0.05).EAC组和OAC组不良反应均较少(分别为3.3%和7.5%,P>0.05).结论 EAC方案Hp根除率较高,尤其在CYP2C19 homEM基因型患者,埃索美拉唑优于奥美拉唑.     

Omeprazole enhances efficacy of triple therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori.

Triple therapy has been recommended as the most effective treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Despite achieving a comparatively high eradication result, however, around 10% of patients still fail to be cured. Omeprazole can enhance efficacy of single and double antibiotic protocols and is particularly effective when combined with clarithromycin and a nitroimidazole. This study examined the effect of combining triple therapy with omeprazole. A prospective, randomised, unblinded, single centre trial was carried out on consecutive patients with symptoms of dyspepsia and H pylori infection confirmed by rapid urease test, microbiological culture, and histological assessment. Patients were given a five times/day, 12 day course of colloidal bismuth subcitrate chewable tablets (108 mg), tetracycline HCl (250 mg), and metronidazole (200 mg) with either 20 mg omeprazole twice daily (triple therapy+omeprazole) or 40 mg famotidine (triple therapy+famotidine) at night. Compliance and side effects were determined using a standard questionnaire form. One hundred and twenty five of 165 triple therapy+omeprazole patients and 124 of 171 triple therapy+famotidine patients returned for rebiopsy four weeks after completion of treatment. Significantly more triple therapy+omeprazole patients achieved eradication 122 of 125 (97.6%) as assessed by negative urease test, culture, and histological assessment, when compared with 110 of 124 (89%) triple therapy+famotidine patients (p = 0.006; chi 2). There were 30 triple therapy+omeprazole (24%) and 26 triple therapy+famotidine (21%) patients with de novo metronidazole resistant H pylori included in the study. Side effects were mild and infrequent and were comparable in both groups, although pain in duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, and oesophagitis patients seemed to subside earlier in those taking omeprazole. Compliance (>95% of drugs taken) was achieved by 98% of patients of both groups. A 12 days regimen of triple therapy with omeprazole is more effective in achieving H pylori eradication than is triple therapy plus famotidine. Use of 20 mg omeprazole twice daily rather than 40 mg famotidine with a 12 day, low dose triple therapy enhances eradication to over 97% whether the H pylori is metronidazole sensitive or resistant.     

不同质子泵抑制剂三联治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性糜烂性胃炎的疗效差异

目的 比较不同质子泵抑制剂(PPI)和抗生素三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌(Hp)阳性糜烂性胃炎的疗效差异.方法 将Hp阳性糜烂性胃炎545例随机给予奥美拉唑、埃索美拉唑、泮托拉唑、兰索拉唑或雷贝拉唑联合阿莫西林与克拉霉素三联疗法治疗7d,比较各组疗效差异.结果 埃索美拉唑组在缓解症状、改善胃镜下表现方面显著高于其它各组,雷贝...     

Comparative study: Vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy

AIM To compare the effectiveness and safety of vonoprazan-based therapy with proton pump inhibitor(PPI)-based therapies to treat Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori).METHODS We retrospectively analysed data from first-line(vonoprazan or PPI with 200 mg clarithromycin and 750 mg amoxicillin twice daily for 7 d)(n = 1353) and second-line(vonoprazan or PPI with 250 mg metronidazole and 750 mg amoxicillin twice daily for 7 d)(n = 261) eradication treatments for H. pylori- positive patients with associated gastrointestinal diseases from April 2014 to December 2015 at Hattori Clinic, Japan. The primary endpoint was the eradication rate, which was assessed with a full analysis set. The secondary endpoints were adverse events and related factors.RESULTS After the first-line treatments, the eradication rates for vonoprazan, esomeprazol, rabeprazole, and lansoprazole were 87.9%(95%CI: 84.9%-90.5%), 71.6%(95%CI: 67.5%-75.5%), 62.9%(95%CI: 52.0%-72.9%), and 57.3%(95%CI: 50.4%-64.1%), respectively. The vonoprazan eradication rate was significantly higher than that of the PPIs(P 0.01). Interestingly, smoking did not affect the H. pylori eradication rate in the vonoprazan group(P = 0.34), whereas it decreased the rates in the PPI groups(P = 0.013). The incidence of adverse events in the vonop-razan group was not different from the PPI group(P = 0.054), although the vonoprazan group exhibited a wider range of adverse events. Vonoprazan-based triple therapy was highly effective as a second-line treatment, with an eradication rate similar to that of PPI-based therapy.CONCLUSION Vonoprazan might be superior to PPIs in first-line H. pylori therapy, particularly for smokers. However, caution is required due to possible adverse events.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication as the sole treatment for gastric and duodenal ulcers

OBJECTIVES: It is uncertain whether eradication of Helicobacter pylori--without a prolonged suppression of acid secretion--is sufficient to allow healing of peptic ulcers. We evaluated whether eradication of H. pylori with no following anti-secretory medication then administered is sufficient for treatment of peptic ulcers. We also looked at the impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) use on ulcer relapses. METHODS: The effect of eradication on ulcer healing and relapse rate was analysed in 115 patients, randomly allocated to four treatment groups: (1) quadruple therapy (28); (2) dual therapy (n-30); (3) triple therapy (n=27); and (4) lansoprazole and placebo (n=30). Endoscopic assessment was performed at 0, 8, and 52 weeks. RESULTS: The ulcer healing rate was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI), 95-100%] in H. pylori-negative and 83% (95% CI, 67-94%) in H. pylori-positive patients (P<0.01). In patients who used NSAIDS or ASA, the healing rates was 100% (95% CI, 73-100%) and 75% (95% CI, 19-99%) in H. pylori-negative (12 patients) and H. pylori-positive patients (four patients) (P = not significant). Ulcer relapses occurred in 5% (95% CI, 1-13%) of H. pylori-negative and in 36% (95% CI, 19-56%) of H. pylori-positive patients (P < 0.01). In H. pylori-negative patients who used NSAIDs or ASA the ulcer relapse rate was 30% (95% CI, 7-65%), whereas the ulcer relapse rate was 2% (95% CI, 0.4-10%) in patients who did not use NSAIDs or ASA (P < 0.05). No difference in ulcer relapse rate in H. pylori-positive patients who used or did not use NSAIDs or ASA was found. The eradication rate of H. pylori was 93% (95% CI, 76-99%) in the quadruple therapy group, 83% (95% CI, 64-94%) in the dual therapy group, 100% (95% CI, 87-100%) in the triple therapy group, and 0% (95% CI, 0-12%) in the lansoprazole and placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Eradication treatment for H. pylori-positive gastric or duodenal ulcer is sufficient, with no need to follow it with anti-secretory medication. Cure of the infection reduces ulcer relapses in patients who did not use NSAIDs or ASA.     

Efficacy of omeprazole and amoxicillin with either clarithromycin or metronidazole on eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Chinese peptic ulcer patients

AIM: One-week triple therapy with proton pump inhibitors, clarithromycin and amoxicillin has recently been proposed as the first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection; however, data regarding the effects of this regimen in China are scarce. The aim of this prospective and randomized study was to compare the efficacy of clarithromycin and metronidazole when they were combined with omeprazole and amoxicillin on eradication of H pylori and ulcer healing in Chinese peptic ulcer patients. METHODS: A total of 103 subjects with Hpylori-positive peptic ulcer were randomly divided into two groups, and accepted triple therapy with omeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 000 mg and either clarithromycin 500 mg (OAC group, n = 58) or metronidazole 400 mg (0AM group, n - 45). All drugs were given twice daily for 7 d. Patients with active peptic ulcer were treated with omeprazole 20 mg daily for 2-4 wk after anti-H pylori therapy. Six to eight weeks after omeprazole therapy, all patients underwent endoscopies and four biopsies (two from the antrum and two others from the corpus of stomach) were taken for rapid urease test and histological analysis (with modified Giemsa staining) to examine H pylori. Successful eradication was defined as negative results from both examination methods. RESULTS: One hundred patients completed the entire course of therapy and returned for follow-up. The eradication rate of H pylori for the per-protocol analysis was 89.3% (50/56) in OAC group and 84.1% (37/44) in 0AM group. Based on the intention-to-treat analysis, the eradication rate of H pylori was 86.2% (50/58) in OAC group and 82.2% (37/45) in 0AM group. There were no significant differences in eradication rates between the two groups on either analysis. The active ulcer-healing rate was 96.7% (29/30) in OAC group and 100% (21/21) in 0AM group (per-protocol analysis, P>0.05). Six patients in OAC group (10.3%) and five in OAM group (11.1%) reported adverse events (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: One-week triple therapy with omeprazole and amoxicillin in combination with either clarithromycin or metronidazole is effective for the eradication of H pylori. The therapeutic regimen comprising metronidazole with low cost, good compliance and mild adverse events may offer a good choice for the treatment of peptic ulcers associated with H pylori infection in China.     

含多西环素的四联方案补救治疗幽门螺杆菌初次根除失败的临床研究

幽门螺杆菌（H．pylori）一线三联疗法的根除失败率日益增高。目的：评价含多西环素的四联方案补救治疗H．pylori初次根除失败的有效性和安全性。方法：共纳入37例日．pyZo打初次根除失败的消化性溃疡、慢性萎缩性胃炎或非溃疡性消化不良患者,予四联方案埃索美拉唑（20rag）＋枸橼酸铋钾（220mg）＋多西环素（100mg）＋阿莫西林（1000mg）,2次／dx10d。治疗结束4周后行”^13C-尿素呼气试验（UBT）以评估H．pylori根除情况。结果：4例患者失访,25例患者补救治疗成功,8例失败,补救治疗意向治疗（ITT）分析和符合方案（PP）分析根除率分别为67．6％和75．8％。21例（63．6％）患者发生轻微不良反应。结论：含多西环素的四联方案是一种安全、有效的H．pylori初次根除失败后的补救治疗方案。     

A prospective randomized trial of esomeprazole- versus pantoprazole-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

OBJECTIVE: This prospective, randomized, controlled, head-to-head study was conducted to compare the efficacies of esomeprazole- and pantoprazole-based triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication. METHODS: From January 2002 to October 2003, 200 H. pylori-infected patients were randomly assigned to undergo twice daily treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 100) or pantoprazole 40 mg (n = 100) combined with clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1 g for 1 wk (ECA and PCA groups, respectively). Follow-up endoscopy was performed at 8 wks after the end of treatment to assess the treatment response. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated a significantly higher eradication rate for the ECA group than for the PCA group (94%vs 82%, respectively, p= 0.009). Per-protocol analysis also showed similar results (97%vs 84%, p= 0.003). Both groups had similar frequencies of adverse events (15%vs 24%) and drug compliance (97%vs 96%). Multivariate analysis disclosed that the use of esomeprazole (OR: 1.56, 95% CI, 1.11-2.19) and good compliance 7.39 (95% CI, 1.27-42.95) were independent predictors of treatment success. Alcohol drinking was an independent predictor of eradication failure (OR: 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.54). CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole-based triple therapy demonstrated a higher eradication rate than pantoprazole-based regimen. The differences in eradiation efficacies between the two study groups may be related to the more powerful acid inhibition effect and stronger anti-H. pylori activity of esomeprazole compared to pantoprazole.