Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock

BackgroundPercutaneous ventricular assist devices and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are increasingly used for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) in hospitals throughout the United States.MethodsUsing the National Inpatient Sample from October 2015 to December 2017, we identified hospital admissions that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and non-elective Impella or ECMO placement for AMI-CS using ICD-10 codes. Propensity-score matching was performed to compare both groups for primary and secondary outcomes.ResultsWe identified 6290 admissions for AMI-CS who underwent PCI and were treated with Impella (n = 5730, 91%) or ECMO (n = 560, 9%) from October 2015 to December 2017. After propensity-match analysis, the ECMO cohort had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (43.3% vs 26.7%, OR: 2.10, p = 0.021). The incidence of acute respiratory failure and vascular complications were significantly lower in the Impella cohort. We observed a shorter duration of hospital stay and lower hospital costs in the Impella cohort compared to those who received ECMO.ConclusionsIn AMI-CS, the use of Impella was associated with better clinical outcomes, fewer complications, shorter length of hospital stay and lower hospital cost compared to those undergoing ECMO placement.     

Automated Algorithm Using Pre-Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve Pullback Curve to Predict Post-Intervention Physiological Results

ObjectivesThis study sought to develop an automated algorithm using pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) pullback recordings to predict post-PCI physiological results in the pre-PCI phase.BackgroundBoth FFR and percent FFR increase measured after PCI showed incremental prognostic implications. However, there is no current method to predict post-PCI physiological results using physiological assessment in the pre-PCI phase.MethodsAn automated algorithm that analyzes instantaneous FFR gradient per unit time (dFFR(t)/dt) was developed from the derivation cohort (n = 30). Using dFFR(t)/dt, the pattern of atherosclerotic disease in each patient was classified into 3 groups (major, mixed, and minor FFR gradient groups) in both the internal validation cohort with constant pullback method (n = 234) and the external validation cohort with nonstandardized pullback methods (n = 252). All patients in the validation cohorts underwent PCI on the basis of pre-PCI FFR ≤0.80. Suboptimal post-PCI physiological results were defined as both post-PCI FFR <0.84 and percent FFR increase ≤15%. From the derivation cohort, cutoffs of dFFR(t)/dt for major and minor FFR gradient were 0.035/s and 0.015/s, respectively.ResultsIn validation cohorts, dFFR(t)/dt showed significant correlations with percent FFR increase (R = 0.801; p < 0.001) and post-PCI FFR (R = 0.099; p = 0.029). In both the internal and external validation cohorts, the major FFR gradient group showed significantly higher post-PCI FFR and percent FFR increase compared with those in the mixed or minor FFR gradient groups (all p values <0.001). The proportions of suboptimal post-PCI physiological results were significantly different among 3 groups (10.4% vs. 25.8% vs. 45.7% for the major, mixed, and minor FFR gradient groups, respectively; p < 0.001) in validation cohorts. Absence of major FFR gradient lesion (odds ratio: 2.435, 95% [CI]: 1.252 to 4.734; p = 0.009) and presence of minor FFR gradient lesion (odds ratio: 2.756, 95% confidence interval: 1.629 to 4.664; p < 0.001) were independent predictors for suboptimal post-PCI physiological results.ConclusionsThe automated algorithm analyzing pre-PCI pullback curve was able to predict post-PCI physiological results. The incidence of suboptimal post-PCI physiological results was significantly different according to algorithm-based classifications in the pre-PCI physiological assessment. (Automated Algorithm Detecting Physiologic Major Stenosis and Its Relationship with Post-PCI Clinical Outcomes [Algorithm-PCI]; NCT04304677)     

COlchicine to Prevent PeriprocEdural Myocardial Injury in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (COPE-PCI): A Descriptive Cytokine Pilot Sub-Study

BackgroundHigh levels of inflammation pre- and post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are associated with worse outcomes. Recent trials have suggested a benefit from treating inflammation with colchicine in coronary artery disease. In this randomised pilot COPE-PCI sub-study, we aimed to determine if administration of colchicine pre-PCI, would attenuate the inflammatory effect of PCI.MethodsPCI patients were randomised to colchicine or placebo, 6 to 24-hours pre-procedure. Study blood samples were taken immediately pre-PCI, and 24-hours post-procedure. Samples were tested for a broad array of inflammatory biomarkers including high-sensitive(hs)-CRP, leucocyte counts, and hs-troponin-. Periprocedural Myocardial Injury (PM-Injury) was defined as per the ESC Third Universal Definitions of Myocardial Infarction.ResultsThirty-six were randomised to colchicine and 39 to placebo. Treatment groups were similar for baseline variables. The median time from drug administration to pre-PCI blood sampling was 18-hours. Overall inflammation was low across the patient population, pre- & post-PCI hsCRP was <1.4 mg/L. Colchicine patients had numerically lower levels of pre-PCI cytokines: IL-1β (p = 0.01), IL-6 (p = 0.02), IL-10 (p = 0.01), IFNγ (p = 0.01), TNFα (p = 0.02) and WBC-count (p = 0.04). Post-PCI (38-hours post-drug) measures of inflammation were similar between treatment arms. Absolute troponin change (post-PCI – pre-PCI levels) was less in colchicine patients (p = 0.02).ConclusionThe reduction in PCI-related myocardial injury that resulted from colchicine given on median 18 h pre-PCI, was associated with numerically lower levels of inflammation pre-PCI but no difference one day post-PCI in the colchicine vs placebo groups.Clinical trial registrationThe trial was publicly registered at www.anzctr.org.au, Trial ID: ACTRN12615000485538.     

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support in Post–Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BackgroundCardiogenic shock (CS) complicates 5%-10% of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is the leading cause of early mortality. It remains unclear whether percutaneous mechanical support (pMCS) devices improve post-AMI CS outcome.MethodsA systematic review of original studies comparing the effect of pMCS on AMI-CS mortality was conducted with the use of Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library databases.ResultsOf 8672 records, 50 were retained for quantitative analysis. Four additional references were added from other sources. Four references reported a significant mortality reduction with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with failed primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or managed with thrombolysis. Meta-analyses showed no advantage of Impella over conventional therapy (pooled OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.20-1.46; I² = 0.85) and increased mortality compared with IABP (pooled OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.08-1.62; I² = 0.85). No study reported a mortality advantage for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) over conventional therapy, IABP, or Impella support. Early mortality might be improved with the addition of IABP or Impella to ECMO. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥ 3 bleeding was increased with every pMCS strategy.ConclusionsThe current evidence is of poor to moderate quality, with only 1 in 5 included articles reporting randomised data and several reporting unadjusted outcomes. Yet, there is some evidence to favour IABP use in the setting of thrombolysis or with failed pPCI, and adding IABP or Impella should be considered for patients requiring ECMO.     

Impella Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundAcute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) is associated with high mortality rates. Data has shown that intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support does not provide a survival benefit over optimal medical therapy in AMICS. Despite lack of supportive evidence, IABP is still commonly used in these clinical situations. The Impella percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) (Abiomed, Denver, MA) rapidly deploys superior mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with AMICS. However, the safety and efficacy of Impella in AMICS is a matter of ongoing investigation, and its role in AMICS management is not yet fully established.MethodsThe databases of Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central databases were searched from inception to March 2020. Relevant randomized trials and observational studies comparing Impella versus IABP in AMICS were identified and a meta-analysis was performed using the random effect model. The efficacy endpoint of interest was short-term mortality (defined as in-hospital or 30-day mortality). The safety endpoints of interest were major bleeding, limb complications, stroke and hemolysis.ResultsA total of 2 randomized trials and 5 observational studies with 3921 patients were included. No difference in short-term mortality between the two groups [RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.87–1.33, P = 0.49] was found. For safety endpoints, Impella was associated with significantly higher incidence of major bleeding [RR: 2.03, 95% CI 1.56–2.64, P < 0.0001], limb complications [RR: 3.67, 95% CI 1.56–8.65, P = 0.003] as well as hemolysis [RR: 9.46, 95% CI 1.75–51.22, P = 0.009] compared with IABP. No significant difference was observed for the incidence of stroke [RR: 1.07 95% CI 0.34–3.31 P = 0.91].ConclusionImpella support in AMICS patients was associated with a significantly increased risk of bleeding, limb complications and hemolysis without an improved short-term survival advantage compared with IABP.     

Prior statin use and the incidence of in-hospital arrhythmia in acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe benefit of prior statin use to reduce the incidence of arrhythmia in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is still a matter of debate. Statins have multiple pleiotropic effects, which may reduce the incidence of in-hospital arrhythmia. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate prior statin use and the incidence of in-hospital arrhythmia in ACS.MethodsThis systematic review was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). We performed a literature search through Pubmed, Proquest, EBSCOhost, and Clinicaltrial.gov. A random-effect model was used due to moderate heterogeneity. Quality assessment was performed using Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Sensitivity analysis was performed by using leave one or two out method. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022336402.ResultsNine eligible studies consisting of 86,795 patients were included. A total of 22,130 (25.5%) patients were in statin use before the index ACS event. The prevalence of old myocardial infarction, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic renal failure and concomitant treatment with aspirin, clopidogrel, and beta blocker was higher in the prior statin group compared to no previous statin. Overall, prior statin use was associated with a significantly lower incidence of in-hospital arrhythmia during ACS compared to no previous statin (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.49–0.72; P < 0.00001; I² = 54%, P-heterogeneity = 0.03). In subgroup analysis, previous statin use reduced the incidence of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43–0.95; P = 0.03; I² = 73%, P-heterogeneity = 0.01) and ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.49–0.65; P < 0.00001; I² = 8%, P-heterogeneity = 0.35).ConclusionsBased on aggregate patient data, prior statin use may reduce the incidence of in-hospital arrhythmia during ACS, particularly atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter and ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.     

Influence of Plaque Characteristics on Early Vascular Healing in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

ObjectivesTo compare the early vascular healing of ruptured plaques (RP) and non-ruptured plaques (NRP) one month after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), using optical coherence tomography (OCT).BackgroundVascular healing and strut coverage are important factors in reducing the risk of stent thrombosis after PCI. Influence of underlying lesion characteristics and differences in healing response between RP and NRP are unknown.MethodsTwenty-six STEMI-patients underwent PCI and implantation of a polymer-free drug-coated Biofreedom stent (BF-BES). OCT was performed pre-PCI, post-PCI and at 1-month follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups: RP = 15 and NRP = 11. OCT analyses of culprit lesion, post stent implantation at baseline and follow-up were performed to determine the difference in vascular healing based on presence of uncovered and/or malapposed stent struts and intraluminal filling defects.ResultsThe stent coverage did not differ significantly between the two groups at 1-month follow-up with percentage of uncovered struts: RP 26.5% [IQR 15.0–49.0] and NRP 28.1% [IQR 15.5–38.8] for NRP (p = 0.78). At 1-month, RP showed an increased percentage of late acquired malapposed struts (1.4% [IQR 0.8–2.4] vs. 0.0% [IQR 0.0–1.4], p = 0.03) and a larger total malapposition area (1.3 mm² [IQR 0.4–2.5] vs. 0.0 mm² [IQR 0.0–0.9], p = 0.01), compared to NRP.ConclusionThree out of four struts were covered within one month after stenting. The vascular healing was comparable in RP and NRP on stent coverage. However, RP had more and larger late acquired malapposition areas.     

Trans-Myocardial Blood Interleukin-6 Levels Relate to Intracoronary Imaging-Defined Features of Plaque Vulnerability and Predict Procedure-Induced Myocardial Infarction

BackgroundIntravascular imaging has defined various vulnerable plaque (VP) phenotypes that predict future clinical events. Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory process and inflammation, measured by systemic biomarkers can also predict events and anti-inflammatory therapy is beneficial. We were interested to assess the relationship between plaque phenotypes and key inflammatory biomarkers, measured close to the coronary.MethodsNinety-two patients scheduled for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) underwent virtual histology intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, pressure wire and blood sampling from the guide catheter (GC), coronary sinus (CS) to determine trans-myocardial gradient (TMG = CS-GC) and from peripheral blood. Procedure related troponin release was assessed at 6-hours post-PCI from peripheral venous blood. Biomarker data were analysed and compared with coronary data.ResultsInterleukin (IL)-6 was associated with increased levels of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α and C-reactive protein (CRP) and the pre-PCI IL-6 TMG correlated with plaque features of vulnerability: plaque burden - PB (r = 0.253, p = 0.04) and minimal lumen area - MLA (r = −0.438, p = 0.007), although no relationship existed for thin-capped fibroatheroma defined by either imaging modality. Peripheral IL-6 levels had no correlation with post PCI troponin, although the pre-PCI IL-6 TMG was related (r = 0.334, p = 0.006), as was PB (r = 0.27, p = 0.029).ConclusionIL-6 TMG pre-PCI correlates with plaque burden and MLA that have been shown to predict future clinical events and is correlated with post-PCI troponin release. These associations were not apparent from peripheral blood and suggest that local coronary biomarker signatures may help further define vulnerability and risk.     

Physiological Distribution and Local Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic implications of physiological 2-dimensional disease patterns on the basis of distribution and local severity of coronary atherosclerosis determined by quantitative flow ratio (QFR) virtual pull back.BackgroundThe beneficial effect of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is determined by physiological distribution and local severity of coronary atherosclerosis.MethodsThe study population included 341 patients who underwent angiographically successful PCI and post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. Using pre-PCI virtual pull backs of QFR, physiological distribution was determined by pull back pressure gradient index, with a cutoff value of 0.78 to define predominant focal versus diffuse disease. Physiological local severity was assessed by instantaneous QFR gradient per unit length, with a cutoff value of ≥0.025/mm to define a major gradient. Suboptimal post-PCI physiological results were defined as both post-PCI FFR ≤0.85 and percentage FFR increase ≤15%. Clinical outcome was assessed by target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years.ResultsQFR pull back pressure gradient index was correlated with post-PCI FFR (R = 0.423; P < 0.001), and instantaneous QFR gradient per unit length was correlated with percentage FFR increase (R = 0.370; P < 0.001). Using the 2 QFR-derived indexes, disease patterns were classified into 4 categories: predominant focal disease with and without major gradient (group 1 [n = 150] and group 2 [n = 21], respectively) and predominant diffuse disease with and without major gradient (group 3 [n = 115] and group 4 [n = 55], respectively). Proportions of suboptimal post-PCI physiological results were significantly different according to the 4 disease patterns (18.7%, 23.8%, 22.6%, and 56.4% from group 1 to group 4, respectively; P < 0.001). Cumulative incidence of TVF after PCI was significantly higher in patients with predominant diffuse disease (8.1% in group 3 and 9.9% in group 4 vs 1.4% in group 1 and 0.0% in group 2; overall P = 0.024).ConclusionsBoth physiological distribution and local severity of coronary atherosclerosis could be characterized without pressure-wire pull backs, which determined post-PCI physiological results. After successful PCI, TVF risk was determined mainly by the physiological distribution of coronary atherosclerosis. (Automated Algorithm Detecting Physiologic Major Stenosis and Its Relationship With Post-PCI Clinical Outcomes [Algorithm-PCI], NCT04304677; Influence of FFR on the Clinical Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PERSPECTIVE], NCT01873560)     

Marijuana Use and In-Hospital Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Michigan,United States

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the association between reported marijuana use and post–percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in-hospital outcomes.BackgroundMarijuana use is increasing as more states in the United States legalize its use for recreational and medicinal purposes. Little is known about the frequency of use and relative safety of marijuana among patients presenting for PCI.MethodsThe authors analyzed Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium PCI registry data between January 1, 2013, and September 30, 2016. One-to-one propensity matching and multivariable logistic regression were used to adjust for differences between patients with or without reported marijuana use, and rates of post-PCI complications were compared.ResultsAmong 113,477 patients, 3,970 reported marijuana use. Compared with those without reported marijuana use, patients with reported marijuana use were likely to be younger (53.9 years vs 65.8 years), to use tobacco (73.0% vs 26.8%), to present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (27.3% vs 15.9%), and to have fewer cardiovascular comorbidities. After matching, compared with patients without reported marijuana use, those with reported marijuana use experienced significantly higher risks for bleeding (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-1.97; P < 0.001) and cerebrovascular accident (aOR: 11.01; 95% CI: 1.32-91.67; P = 0.026) and a lower risk for acute kidney injury (aOR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.42-0.87; P = 0.007). There were no significant differences in risks for transfusion and death.ConclusionsA modest fraction of patients undergoing PCI used marijuana. Reported marijuana use was associated with higher risks for cerebrovascular accident and bleeding and a lower risk for acute kidney injury after PCI. Clinicians and patients should be aware of the higher risk for post-PCI complications in these patients.     

Correlates for mortality in patients presented with acute myocardial infarct complicated by cardiogenic shock

ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore the correlates for mortality in patients treated with both primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and intra-aortic balloon pump counter-pulsation (IABP).BackgroundAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high mortality rates.MethodsFrom a cohort of patients with AMI, treated with both primary PCI and IABP and who met strict definitions for CS to identify correlates associated with mortality, the study compared patients who died in-hospital to those who survived to discharge.ResultsA cohort of 93 patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of them, 66.7% were male, and the average age was 64.96 ± 13.06 years. The overall in-hospital mortality rate for this cohort was 33%. The baseline characteristics were balanced save for older average age and left ventricular ejection fraction in those who died (p = 0.049 and p = 0.014, respectively). Insertion of IABP pre-PCI and cardiac arrest at the catheterization lab were more frequent in those who died (p = 0.027 and p = 0.008, respectively). The insertion of IABP pre-PCI, cardiac arrest at the cath lab, and lower ejection fraction were correlated with in-hospital mortality (ORs 2.68, 5.93, and 0.02, respectively).ConclusionsIn the era of primary PCI and IABP as standard of care in AMI complicated by CS, patients with low EF, those who necessitate IABP insertion pre-PCI, and those who necessitate cardiopulmonary resuscitation during PCI are at higher risk for in-hospital mortality and should be considered for more robust hemodynamic support devices with an attempt to improve their prognosis.     

Coronary Angiography in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Without ST-Segment Elevation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ObjectivesThe authors conducted a meta-analysis to study clinical outcomes in patients who underwent early versus nonearly coronary angiography (CAG) in the setting of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) without ST-segment elevation.BackgroundThe benefit of performing early CAG in patients with OHCA without STE remains disputed.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines from inception until February 21, 2020. Early and nonearly CAG patients were identified on the basis of the definitions mentioned in respective published studies. The primary outcome studied was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were neurological status and the rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following cardiac arrest.ResultsOf 4,516 references, 11 studies enrolling 3,581 patients were included in the final meta-analysis. Random-effects analysis showed no differences in 30-day mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71 to 1.04; p = 0.12; I² = 74%), neurological status (RR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.24; p = 0.28; I² = 69%), and rate of PCI (RR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.59; p = 0.13; I² = 67%) between the 2 groups. Diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, previous PCI, and lactate level were found to be significant predictors of 30-day mortality on meta-regression (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThis analysis shows that there is no significant difference in 30-day mortality, neurological status, or rate of PCI among patients with OHCA without STE treated with early versus nonearly CAG. Thirty-day mortality is determined by presentation comorbidities rather than revascularization.     

Preloading with atorvastatin before percutaneous coronary intervention in statin-naïve Asian patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: A randomized study

BackgroundData on atorvastatin pretreatment in Asian patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited. However, there have been studies in other populations in Asia which demonstrated that statins can reduce the risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI).Methods and resultsStatin-naïve patients with non-ST-segment-elevation (NSTE)-ACS scheduled for PCI were randomized to usual care or atorvastatin preloading groups. All patients received usual care including atorvastatin 40 mg/day. The atorvastatin group received atorvastatin 80 mg 12 h and 40 mg 2 h pre-PCI. Of 499 patients randomized, 247 were assigned to atorvastatin preloading. Following coronary angiography, 335 patients (163 atorvastatin) received PCI. During the 30 days post-PCI, major adverse cardiac events (death, MI, and target vessel revascularization) occurred in 24 (15%) atorvastatin and 27 (16%) usual care patients (p = NS). Post hoc analyses showed that at 8 h post-PCI, 3.82% of the atorvastatin group and 7.22% of the usual care group had a post-procedural creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) above 3 times the upper limit of normal (p = 0.27) and at 24 h post-PCI, the rate was 7.64% versus 9.47% (p = 1.0). Safety profile suggests that high-dose atorvastatin (40 mg) for up to 1 month, in conjunction with usual care, is relatively safe and well tolerated.ConclusionsThis study of statin-naïve Korean and Chinese patients with NSTE-ACS who received additional atorvastatin loading doses of 80 mg at 12 h, and 40 mg at 2 h, pre-PCI did not find a beneficial effect compared with usual post-PCI atorvastatin 40 mg/day treatment. Atorvastatin was found to be well tolerated in Asian patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing PCI. Results of the current study merit further investigation of the early use of statins in patients with NSTE-ACS to delineate patient subgroups who may benefit from this therapy.     

FFR=1.0 flow changes after percutaneous coronary intervention

BackgroundThe present study investigated the relationships between physiological indices and increased coronary flow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a novel index of “anticipated maximum flow” [AMF; theoretical coronary flow of fractional flow reserve (FFR) = 1]. FFR-guided PCI aims to increase coronary flow, whereas recent studies have reported that PCI does not necessarily increase coronary flow despite improvement in FFR.MethodsThis retrospective analysis was performed in 71 functionally significant lesions treated with elective PCI. AMF obtained by hyperemic average peak coronary flow velocity (h-APV) divided by FFR would not change after PCI given the constant microvascular resistance, which is the assumption of FFR as a surrogate of coronary flow. We evaluated the relationship between AMF and coronary flow during PCI.ResultsPost-PCI AMF was significantly different from pre-PCI AMF (p = 0.022), which impacted discordance between FFR improvement and change in coronary flow. Coronary flow increase >50% was associated with smaller minimum lumen diameter (p = 0.010), greater diameter stenosis (p = 0.003), lower pre-PCI FFR (p < 0.001), lower pre-PCI coronary flow reserve (p = 0.001), higher pre-PCI hyperemic stenosis resistance (p < 0.001), lower pre-PCI h-APV (p = 0.001), and lower pre-PCI AMF (p = 0.031). Pre-PCI AMF provided significant incremental predictive capability for coronary flow increase >50% when added to the clinical model including pre-PCI FFR.ConclusionPre-PCI AMF provided incremental ability to predict increased coronary flow after PCI and impacted the discordance between FFR improvement and increased coronary flow.     

Prognostic Implications of Post-Intervention Resting Pd/Pa and Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stent Implantation

ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate the prognostic implications of post–percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) nonhyperemic pressure ratios compared with that of post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR).BackgroundFFR measured after PCI has been shown to possess prognostic implications. However, the prognostic value of post-PCI nonhyperemic pressure ratios has not yet been clarified.MethodsA total of 588 patients who underwent PCI with available both post-PCI FFR and resting distal coronary pressure-to-aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) were analyzed. Post-PCI FFR and Pd/Pa were measured after successful angiographic stent implantation. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) up to 2 years, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Prognosis of patients according to post-PCI Pd/Pa was compared with that of post-PCI FFR.ResultsDespite angiographically successful PCI, 18.5% had post-PCI FFR ≤0.80 and 36.9% showed post-PCI Pd/Pa ≤0.92. In post-PCI Pd/Pa >0.92 group, 93.8% of patients showed post-PCI FFR >0.80. Conversely, 60.4% of patients showed post-PCI FFR >0.80 in post-PCI Pd/Pa ≤0.92 group. Although there was significant difference in TVF according to post-PCI FFR (≤0.80 vs. >0.80: 10.3% vs. 2.5%; p < 0.001) and Pd/Pa (≤0.92 vs. >0.92: 6.2% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.029), the reclassification ability of model for TVF was increased only with post-PCI FFR (net reclassification index 0.627; p = 0.003; integrated discrimination index 0.019; p = 0.015), but not with post-PCI Pd/Pa, compared with model including clinical factors. Compared with patients with post-PCI Pd/Pa >0.92, patients with post-PCI Pd/Pa ≤0.92 and FFR ≤0.80 had significantly higher risk of TVF (10.4% vs. 2.5%; adjusted hazard ratio: 4.204; 95% confidence interval: 1.521 to 11.618; p = 0.006); however, those with post-PCI Pd/Pa ≤0.92 but FFR >0.80 showed similar risk of TVF (3.5% vs. 2.5%; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.327; 95% confidence interval: 0.398 to 4.428; p = 0.645).ConclusionsOver one-half of the patients with abnormal post-PCI Pd/Pa ≤0.92 showed post-PCI FFR >0.80. Compared with post-PCI FFR, post-PCI Pd/Pa showed limited reclassification ability for the occurrence of TVF. Among patients with abnormal post-PCI Pd/Pa, only patients with positive post-PCI FFR showed significantly higher risk of TVF than did those with post-PCI Pd/Pa >0.92. (Prognostic Perspective of Invasive Hyperemic and Non-Hyperemic Physiologic Indices Measured After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PERSPECTIVEPCI]; NCT04265443)     

1-Year Outcomes of Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful PCI: DEFINE PCI Trial

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to identify the post–percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) target value of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) that would best discriminate clinical events at 1 year in the DEFINE PCI (Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Following PCI) study.BackgroundThe impact of residual ischemia detected by iFR post-PCI on clinical and symptom-related outcomes is unknown.MethodsBlinded iFR pull back was performed after successful stent implantation in 500 patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of residual ischemia, defined as iFR ≤0.89, after operator-assessed angiographically successful PCI. Secondary endpoints included clinical events at 1 year and change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency (SAQ-AF) score during follow-up.ResultsAs reported, 24.0% of patients had residual ischemia (iFR ≤0.89) after successful PCI, with 81.6% of cases attributable to angiographically inapparent focal lesions. Post-PCI iFR ≥0.95 (present in 182 cases [39%]) was associated with a significant reduction in the composite of cardiac death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization compared with post-PCI iFR <0.95 (1.8% vs 5.7%; P = 0.04). Baseline SAQ-AF score was 73.3 ± 22.8. For highly symptomatic patients (baseline SAQ-AF score ≤60), SAQ-AF score increased by ≥10 points more frequently in patients with versus without post-PCI iFR ≥0.95 (100.0% vs 88.5%; P = 0.01).ConclusionsIn DEFINE PCI, despite angiographically successful PCI, highly symptomatic patients at baseline without residual ischemia by post-PCI iFR had greater reductions in anginal symptoms at 1 year compared with patients with residual ischemia. Achieving post-PCI iFR ≥0.95 was also associated with improved 1-year event-free survival. (Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Following PCI [DEFINE PCI]; NCT03084367)     

Diabetes as a risk factor for greater COVID-19 severity and in-hospital death: A meta-analysis of observational studies

AimsTo estimate the prevalence of established diabetes and its association with the clinical severity and in-hospital mortality associated with COVID-19.Data synthesisWe systematically searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, from 1st January 2020 to 15th May 2020, for observational studies of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects modeling. A total of 83 eligible studies with 78,874 hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were included. The pooled prevalence of established diabetes was 14.34% (95% CI 12.62–16.06%). However, the prevalence of diabetes was higher in non-Asian vs. Asian countries (23.34% [95% CI 16.40–30.28] vs. 11.06% [95% CI 9.73–12.39]), and in patients aged ≥60 years vs. those aged <60 years (23.30% [95% CI 19.65–26.94] vs. 8.79% [95% CI 7.56–10.02]). Pre-existing diabetes was associated with an approximate twofold higher risk of having severe/critical COVID-19 illness (n = 22 studies; random-effects odds ratio 2.10, 95% CI 1.71–2.57; I² = 41.5%) and ~threefold increased risk of in-hospital mortality (n = 15 studies; random-effects odds ratio 2.68, 95% CI 2.09–3.44; I² = 46.7%). Funnel plots and Egger's tests did not reveal any significant publication bias.ConclusionsPre-existing diabetes is significantly associated with greater risk of severe/critical illness and in-hospital mortality in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.     

Predictive values of post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by different platelet function tests on ischemic events in East Asian patients treated with PCI

Abstract

An accumulating number of studies are revealing that platelet reactivity above specific cut-off scores leads to exponentially increased rates of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ischemic events. To evaluate the optimal predictive values for three different platelet function measurement assays of platelet reactivity on early clinical outcomes in Korean patients undergoing PCI, we enrolled 228 patients receiving clopidogrel prior to PCI. Platelet reactivity was measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow P2Y₁₂ assay, and multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA). The primary endpoint was the 30-day occurrence of ischemic events after PCI. MACE occurred in 36 patients (15.8%), including 35 patients (15.4%) with periprocedural MI and the death of one patient (0.4%). ADP-induced LTA and VerifyNow values (pre- and post-PCI) were significantly higher in patients with the subsequent occurrence of periprocedural MI, but the MEA assay data (PCI and post-PCI) displayed no significant differences (pre-PCI p?=?0.25 and post-PCI p?=?0.33). ROC curve analysis demonstrated HPR values for LTA (pre-PCI, >66% and post-PCI, >53 %, all p?<?0.001), VerifyNow (pre-PCI, >347 PRU and post-PCI >272 PRU, all p?<?0.001) and MEA (pre-PCI, >50 U and post-PCI >39 U, all p?>?0.05). The platelet reactivity measurements by LTA and the VerifyNow assay can discriminate the risk of 30-day ischemic events after PCI. The predictive cut-off values for adverse events are dependent on sampling time.     

Prasugrel vs Ticagrelor for DAPT in Patients with ACS Undergoing PCI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

IntroductionDual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with a P2Y12 inhibitor added to aspirin is considered the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous intervention (PCI). Prasugrel and ticagrelor are commonly used P2Y12 inhibitors, and a few head-to-head randomized control trials (RCTs) have been performed. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of these RCTs to compare the efficacy and adverse effects between these two agents when used in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.MethodsWe searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library for RCTs comparing prasugrel to ticagrelor in ACS. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, major bleeding, and all bleeding event. Estimates were calculated as random effects risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsSix trials with 6807 patients were included. There were no significant difference of MACE (RR 0.93; 95% CI [0.72–1.20]; p = 0.59; I² = 26%), all-cause mortality (RR 0.92; 95% CI [0.73–1.17]; p = 0.51; I² = 0%), cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.99; 95% CI [0.75–1.31]; p = 0.96; I² = 0%), MI (RR 0.87; 95% CI [0.60–1.27]; p = 0.48; I² = 27%), stent thrombosis (RR 0.64; 95% CI [0.39–1.04]; p = 0.07; I² = 0%), major bleeding (RR 0.94; 95% CI [0.70–1.26]; p = 0.68; I² = 6%), and all bleeding event (RR 0.92; 95% CI [0.77–1.09]; p = 0.32; I² = 0%) for prasugrel compared with ticagrelor.ConclusionThere are no significant difference of MACE, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, MI, stent thrombosis, and bleeding between prasugrel and ticagrelor when added to aspirin among patients with ACS undergoing PCI.     

Impact of concomitant respiratory infections in the management and outcomes acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock

ObjectiveTo evaluate the prevalence and impact of respiratory infections in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS).MethodsUsing the National Inpatient Sample (2000–2017), this study identified adult (≥18 years) admitted with AMI-CS complicated by respiratory infections. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality of AMI-CS admissions with and without respiratory infections, hospitalization costs, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition. Temporal trends of prevalence, in-hospital mortality and cardiac procedures were evaluated.ResultsAmong 557,974 AMI-CS admissions, concomitant respiratory infections were identified in 84,684 (15.2%). Temporal trends revealed a relatively stable trend in prevalence of respiratory infections over the 18-year period. Admissions with respiratory infections were on average older, less likely to be female, with greater comorbidity, had significantly higher rates of NSTEMI presentation, and acute non-cardiac organ failure compared to those without respiratory infections (all p < 0.001). These admissions received lower rates of coronary angiography (66.8% vs 69.4%, p < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary interventions (44.8% vs 49.5%, p < 0.001), with higher rates of mechanical circulatory support, pulmonary artery catheterization, and invasive mechanical ventilation compared to AMI-CS admissions without respiratory infections (all p < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality was lower among AMI-CS admissions with respiratory infections (31.6% vs 38.4%, adjusted OR 0.58 [95% CI 0.57–0.59], p < 0.001). Admissions with respiratory infections had longer lengths of hospital stay (127, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 vs 63, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 days, p < 0.001), higher hospitalization costs and less frequent discharges to home (27.1% vs 44.7%, p < 0.001).ConclusionsRespiratory infections in AMI-CS admissions were associated with higher resource utilization but lower in-hospital mortality.