Improved prognosis with induction chemotherapy in pathological complete responders after trimodality treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Hypothesis generating for adjuvant treatment

PurposeTo compare the locations of recurrences and survival outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with or without preceding induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by esophagectomy.MethodsAmong 276 patients with locally advanced ESCC undergoing trimodality treatment during 2004–2014, 94 (34.1%) with pCR were eligible. The cohort included 26 patients undergoing IC before CCRT (IC group), and 68 patients who did not receive IC (non-IC group).ResultsAt a median follow-up of 51.4 months (95% confidence interval; 42.9–62.1), 19 patients experienced recurrences. There was a trend toward fewer distant failures in the IC group (0% vs.14.7%, p = 0.057), while locoregional recurrence was similar (7.7% vs. 7.4%). IC was associated with significantly improved survivals with the 5-year RFS and OS rates for the IC group of 85.1% and 90.5%, respectively, compared to of 46.2% and 48.1% for the non-IC group (p = 0.008 for RFS, and p = 0.015 for OS). By multivariable analyses, IC remained the only significant factor associated with survivals (HR:0.18 for RFS, p = 0.020 and HR:0.18 for OS, p = 0.025). The effect of IC in the whole cohort, irrespective of pathological response, was also assessed. Patients with non-pCR in the IC group had a trend toward worse survivals compared to the non-IC groupConclusionsIn ESCC patients with pCR after trimodality treatment, IC was associated with favorable survivals. The benefits of IC might be a hypothesis generation for adjuvant treatment for patients with pCR.     

Meta‐Analysis on Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

PurposeConcurrent chemo radiotherapy (CCRT) has been the standard of care in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA‐NPC) for many years. The role of induction chemotherapy (ICT) has always been controversial. This systematic review and meta‐analysis investigates the value of adding ICT to CCRT in LA‐NPC.Materials and MethodsTwo reviewers independently assessed the eligibility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICT followed by CCRT versus CCRT alone, including treatment‐naive adult patients with histologically proven nonmetastatic LA‐NPC.ResultsEight RCTs with in total 2,384 randomized patients, of whom 69% had N2–N3 disease, were selected. ICT was the allocated treatment in 1,200 patients, of whom 1,161 actually received this. Treatment compliance varied, with a median rate of 92% (range, 86%–100%) of patients receiving all cycles of ICT. The percentage of patients completing radiotherapy was 96% and 95% [(Combined Risk difference(CRD)= 0.004; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) –0.001–0.01; p = 0.14)] in the ICT group and CCRT group, respectively, whereas chemotherapy during radiotherapy could be completed in only 28% of the ICT group versus 61% in the CCRT group (CRD, −0.243; 95% CI, −0.403 to −0.083; p = .003). Grade 3–4 acute toxicity was mostly hematologic during the ICT phase (496 events vs. 191 nonhematologic) and was predominant in the ICT group (1,596 events vs. 1,073 in the CCRT alone group) during the CCRT. Adding ICT to CCRT provided a significant benefit in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.680; 95% CI, 0.511–0.905; p = .001) and progression‐free survival (HR, 0.657; 95% CI, 0.568–0.760; p < .001).ConclusionAlthough ICT followed by CCRT is associated with more acute toxicity and a lower compliance of the chemotherapy during the CCRT phase, this association resulted in a clinically meaningful survival benefit. ICT should be considered as a standard option in patients with LA‐NPC, but further study on optimal patient selection for this treatment is warranted.Implications for PracticeLocally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA‐NPC) is a relatively common disease in some parts of the world, with a rather poor prognosis due to its high metastatic potential. The role of induction chemotherapy (ICT) has always been controversial. This meta‐analysis found that ICT followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in LA‐NPC is associated with a significant clinical improvement in both overall survival and progression‐free survival compared with CCRT alone. ICT should be considered as a standard option in patients with LA‐NPC.     

Two-year outcome of concurrent chemoradiation with carboplatin with or without adjuvant carboplatin/fluorouracil in nasopharyngeal cancer: A multicenter randomized trial

BackgroundAccording to the noninferiority result of chemoradiation with carboplatin in our previous nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) study along with the inconclusive data on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), we designed to assess the role of adjuvant carboplatin/fluorouracil following CCRT with carboplatin in locoregionally advanced NPC.Materials and MethodsA multicenter randomized trial was conducted at 5 cancer centers in Thailand. We enrolled in stage T2N0M0-T4N2M0 (American Joint Cancer Committee 7th edition) WHO Type 2 NPC patients. N3 or metastatic disease patients were excluded. Participants were randomized into 2 groups: CCRT plus AC group vs the CCRT alone group. Patients in both groups received weekly carboplatin 100 mg/m² for 6 cycles concurrently with radiotherapy 69.96-70 Gy. Patients in the AC group subsequently received 3 cycles of carboplatin area under curve-5 plus 1000 mg/m²/day of fluorouracil infusion within 96 hours every 3 weeks. We report the 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Treatment-related toxicities and compliance were also explored.ResultsOf 175 patients, 82 (46.9%) were assigned to the AC group, and 93 (53.1%) to the CCRT group. The compliance rate during CCRT was 90% and 86% in the AC and CCRT group, whereas 81.7% during adjuvant treatment in the AC group. With a median follow-up time of 24.4 months (interquartile range 17.9-24.4), the 2-year OS rate was 89.6% in the AC group and 81.8% in the CCRT group (P= 0.167). The 2-year DFS rate was 86.8% in the AC group and 74.6% in the CCRT group (P = 0.042). The 2-year LRFS rate was 91.5% in the AC group and 88.2% in the CCRT group (P = 0.443). The 2-year DMFS rate was 85.4% in the AC group and 79.6% in the CCRT group (P = 0.294). The most frequent serious (grade 3/4) nonhematologic toxicity was acute mucositis, which occurred 5% in the AC group vs 4% in the CCRT group (P = 0.498). For hematologic toxicity, grade 3-4 leukopenia were found 10% and 5% in the adjuvant and CCRT groups, respectively (P = 0.003). Multivariate analyses determined stage N2 disease was an adverse prognostic factor associated with shorter OS, DFS, and DMFS. And the adjuvant treatment was a significant protective factor for only DFS.ConclusionsThe addition of adjuvant carboplatin/fluorouracil following CCRT with carboplatin significantly improved 2-year DFS in stage T2N0M0-T4N2M0 NPC albeit there was a nonsignificant trend in favor of a higher 2-year OS, LRFS, and DMFS. Long-term efficacy and late toxicities of AC still require exploration.     

Statin Use,Heart Radiation Dose,and Survival in Locally Advanced Lung Cancer

PurposePatients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) have a high prevalence of pre-existing coronary heart disease and face excess cardiac risk after thoracic radiation therapy. We sought to assess whether statin therapy is a predictor of overall survival (OS) after thoracic radiation therapy.Methods and MaterialsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 748 patients with LA-NSCLC treated with thoracic radiation therapy, using Kaplan-Meier OS estimates and Cox regression.ResultsStatin use among high cardiac risk patients (Framingham risk ≥20% or pre-existing coronary heart disease; n = 496) was 51.2%. After adjustment for baseline cardiac risk and other prognostic factors, statin therapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.91; P = .048) but not major adverse cardiac events (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.52-2.68; P = .69). Among statin-naïve patients, mean heart dose ≥10 Gy versus <10 Gy was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.68; P = .022), with 2-year OS estimates of 46.9% versus 60.0%, respectively. However, OS did not differ by heart dose among patients on statin therapy (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.76-1.32; P = 1.00; P-interaction = .031), with 2-year OS estimates of 46.9% versus 50.3%, respectively.ConclusionsAmong patients with LA-NSCLC, only half of statin-eligible high cardiac risk patients were on statin therapy, reflecting the highest cardiac risk level of our cohort. Statin use was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality but not major adverse cardiac events. Elevated mean heart dose (≥10 Gy) was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in statin-naïve patients but not among those on statin therapy, identifying a group of patients in which early intervention with statins may mitigate the deleterious effects of high heart radiation therapy dose. This warrants evaluation in prospective trials.     

The Association Between Survival and Receipt of Post-mastectomy Radiotherapy According to Age at Diagnosis Among Women With Early Invasive Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study

AimsClinical trials of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for early invasive breast cancer (EIBC) have included few older women. This study examined whether the association between overall survival or breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and receipt of PMRT for EIBC altered with age.Materials and methodsThe study used patient-level linked cancer registration, routine hospital and radiotherapy data for England and Wales. It included 31 243 women aged ≥50 years diagnosed between 2014 and 2018 with low- (T1-2N0), intermediate- (T3N0/T1-2N1) or high-risk (T1-2N2/T3N1-2) EIBC who received a mastectomy within 12 months from diagnosis. Patterns of survival were analysed using a landmark approach. Associations between overall survival/BCSS and PMRT in each risk group were analysed with flexible parametric survival models, which included patient and tumour factors; whether the association between PMRT and overall survival/BCSS varied by age was assessed using interaction terms.ResultsAmong 4711 women with high-risk EIBC, 86% had PMRT. Five-year overall survival was 70.5% and BCSS was 79.3%. Receipt of PMRT was associated with improved overall survival [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.64–0.87] and BCSS (aHR 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.65–0.95) compared with women who did not have PMRT; associations did not vary by age (overall survival, P-value for interaction term = 0.141; BCSS, P = 0.077). Among 10 814 women with intermediate-risk EIBC, 59% had PMRT; 5-year overall survival was 78.4% and BCSS was 88.0%. No association was found between overall survival (aHR 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.92–1.11) or BCSS (aHR 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.01–1.32) and PMRT. There was statistical evidence of a small change in the association with age for overall survival (P = 0.007), although differences in relative survival were minimal, but not for BCSS (P = 0.362).ConclusionsThe association between PMRT and overall survival/BCSS does not appear to be modified by age among women with high- or intermediate-risk EIBC and, thus, treatment recommendations should not be modified on the basis of age alone.     

Survival benefit of statins in older patients with rectal cancer: A Swedish population-based cohort study

ObjectivesIncreasing evidence suggests that statins may have antitumor effects but their role in rectal cancer appears inconclusive. The aim of this study was to investigate whether statins may have an impact on survival of older and younger patients with rectal cancer.Materials and MethodsThis study included 238 patients ≥70 years and 227 patients <70 years old, from the Southeast Health Care Region of Sweden, who were diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2013.ResultsIn the older group (n = 238), statin use at the time of diagnosis was related to better cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), compared to non-use (CSS: Hazard Ratio (HR), 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19–0.72; P = .003; OS: HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39–0.96; P = .032). In the older group with stages I-III disease (n = 199), statin use was associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) compared to non use (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06–0.59; P = .005). The improvement of CSS, OS and DFS remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders. In the older group with stage III disease, statin users had better CSS and DFS compared to non-users (log rank P = .043; log-rank P = .028, respectively). In the older group with short course radiotherapy, statin use was related to better CSS (log-rank P = .032). No such association was present in the younger group.ConclusionStatin use was related to improved survival in older patients with rectal cancer.This observation is important given the low cost and safety of statins as a drug.     

Baseline and postoperative C-reactive protein levels predict mortality in operable lung cancer

BackgroundHigher blood levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) have been associated with shorter survival in patients with cardiovascular, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cancer. We investigated the impact of baseline and postoperative CRP levels on survival of patients with operable lung cancer (LC).Patients and methodsCRP values at baseline (CRP₀) and 3 days after surgery (CRP₃) were measured in a consecutive series of 1750 LC patients who underwent complete resection between 2003 and 2015. Patients were classified as having 0 (N = 593), 1 (N = 658) or 2 (N = 553) risk factors: CRP₀ and/or CRP₃ values above the respective median value. The effect of higher CRP was evaluated by Kaplan–Meier mortality curves and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), by fitting Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsCumulative proportions of 5-year survival were 67% for 0 risk factors, 58% for 1 risk factor and 41% for 2 risk factors (P < 0.0001). The overall 5-year mortality risk was significantly higher in patients with 1 risk factor (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.43 [95% CI 1.14–1.79]), or 2 risk factors (aHR 2.49 [95% CI 1.99–3.11]). A significant impact on survival was observed in each tumour-node-metastasis stage group, and in the subset of non-smokers. Postoperative 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with 2 risk factors only (aHR 2.2% versus 0.6%, p < 0.0475).ConclusionsBaseline and postoperative CRP levels predict immediate and long-term mortality in all stages of operable lung cancer. Patients with higher CRP levels could be candidate to randomised adjuvant trials with anti-inflammatory agents.     

Preliminary results of consolidation chemotherapy following concurrent chemoradiation after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage carcinoma of the uterine cervix

AimsTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin in the treatment of high-risk, early stage cervical carcinoma after radical surgery.Materials and methodsWomen with clinical stage IB and IIA cervical carcinoma, initially treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and who had positive pelvic lymph nodes, positive margins, parametrial involvement, or all three, were divided into either a CCRT alone group or a consolidation chemotherapy after CCRT group. Three cycles of chemotherapy were given to the CCRT alone group, and six cycles to the consolidation chemotherapy group. Women in each group received 50.4 Gy external radiation in 28 fractions to a standard pelvic field. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin 60 mg/m² (× 1) and 5-FU 1000 mg/m²/d (× 5) every 3 weeks, with the first and second cycles given concurrent with radiation. Survival and toxicity were compared between the two groups.ResultsForty women were evaluable (25 in the CCRT alone group and 15 in the consolidation chemotherapy group). The estimated 2-year progression-free survival was 87.7% in the CCRT alone group and 67.0% in the consolidation chemotherapy group. The estimated 2-year overall survival was 95.8% in the CCRT alone group and 100% in the consolidation chemotherapy group. However, no significant differences were found in progression-free and overall survival in the two groups (P = 0.17 and P = 0.29, respectively). Grade 2 or higher leukopenia and neutropenia were significantly more frequent in the consolidation chemotherapy group than in the CCRT alone group (P = 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively).ConclusionsAlthough the sample size was small, and this study was not randomised, these results suggest that consolidation chemotherapy may not improve survival. Rather, it may increase haematologic toxicities for women with high-risk, early stage cervical carcinoma who undergo radical surgery followed by CCRT.     

Statins and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundA growing body of evidence has demonstrated the anti-neoplastic activity of statins. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of statin use on survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated in the modern therapy era.Patients and methodsWe conducted a pooled analysis of mRCC patients treated on phase II and III clinical trials. Statistical analyses were performed using Cox regression and the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsWe identified 4736 patients treated with sunitinib (n = 1059), sorafenib (n = 772), axitinib (n = 896), temsirolimus (n = 457), temsirolimus + interferon (IFN)-α (n = 208), bevacizumab + temsirolimus (n = 393), bevacizumab + IFN-α (n = 391) or IFN-α (n = 560), of whom 511 were statin users. Overall, statin users demonstrated an improved overall survival (OS) compared to non-users (25.6 versus 18.9 months, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.801, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.659–0.972, p = 0.025). When stratified by therapy type, a benefit in OS was demonstrated in statin users compared to non-users in individuals receiving therapy targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (28.4 versus 22.2 months, aHR 0.749, 95% CI 0.584–0.961, p = 0.023) or mammalian target of rapamycin (18.6 versus 14.0 months, aHR 0.657, 95% CI 0.445–0.972, p = 0.035) but not in those receiving IFN-α (15.6 versus 14.8 months, aHR 1.292, 95% CI 0.703–2.275, p = 0.410). Adverse events were similar between users and non-users.ConclusionsWe demonstrate that statin use may be associated with improved survival in patients with mRCC treated in the targeted therapy era. Statins could represent an adjunct therapy for patients with mRCC; however, this is hypothesis generating and requires prospective evaluation.     

Porphyromonas gingivalis infection exacerbates oesophageal cancer and promotes resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background The effect of Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) infection on oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) prognosis, chemotherapeutic efficacy, and oesophageal cancer cell apoptosis resistance and proliferation remain poorly understood.Methods Clinicopathological data from 312 ESCC oesophagectomy patients, along with the computed tomography imaging results and longitudinal cancerous tissue samples from a patient subset (n = 85) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), were analysed. Comparison of overall survival and response rate to NACT between Pg-infected and Pg-uninfected patients was made by multivariate Cox analysis and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours v.1.1 criteria. The influence of Pg on cell proliferation and drug-induced apoptosis was examined in ESCC patients and validated in vitro and in vivo.Results The 5-year overall survival was lower in Pg-positive patients, and infection was associated with multiple clinicopathological factors and pathologic tumour, node, metastasis stage. Of the 85 patients who received NACT, Pg infection was associated with a lower response rate and 5-year overall survival. Infection with Pg resulted in apoptosis resistance in ESCC and promoted ESCC cell viability, which was confirmed in longitudinal cancerous tissue samples. Pg-induced apoptosis resistance was dependent on fimbriae and STAT3.Conclusions Pg infection is associated with a worse ESCC prognosis, reduced chemotherapy efficacy, and can potentiate the aggressive behaviour of ESCC cells.Subject terms: Pathogenesis, Risk factors, Oesophageal cancer     

Long-term follow-up of a phase III study comparing radiotherapy with or without weekly oxaliplatin for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BackgroundPrevious results from our trial showed that adding oxaliplatin to radiotherapy (RT) increased survival in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) at 2 years. Here, we present the data of long-term efficacy and late toxic effects.Patients and methodsBetween January 2001 and January 2003, 115 Patients with nonkeratinizing/undifferentiated locoregionally advanced NPC were randomly to receive either RT alone (n = 56) or plus concurrent oxaliplatin 70 mg/m² weekly for six cycles (n = 59).ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 114 months (range 18–139 months), the 5-year overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) group were significantly higher than those observed in the RT-alone group (OS, 73.2% versus 60.2%, P = 0.028; MFS, 74.7% versus 63.0%, P = 0.027). However, CCRT did not improve locoregional failure-free survival significantly. Subgroup analyses showed that the superiorities of CCRT mainly existed in the T3-4N0-1 stage subgroup (OS: HR = 0.394, P = 0.034). The grade 3/4 late toxic effects were similar in the two groups.Conclusion(s)The long-term follow-up data confirms the role of CCRT as a treatment of locoregionally advanced NPC. Oxaliplatin can be considered as an alternative optional therapeutic regimen for these patients due to its high efficiency and low toxic effect.     

Comparisons of survival outcomes between bevacizumab and olaparib in BRCA-mutated,platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study (KGOG 3052)

ObjectiveTo compare survival outcomes between bevacizumab (BEV) and olaparib (OLA) maintenance therapy in BRCA-mutated, platinum-sensitive relapsed (PSR) high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC).MethodsFrom 10 institutions, we identified HGSOC patients with germline and/or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, who experienced platinum-sensitive recurrence between 2013 and 2019, and received second-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were divided into BEV (n=29), OLA (n=83), and non-BEV/non-OLA users (n=36). The OLA and non-BEV/non-OLA users were grouped as the OLA intent group. We conducted 1:2 nearest neighbor-matching between the BEV and OLA intent groups, setting the proportion of OLA users in the OLA intent group from 65% to 100% at 5% intervals, and compared survival outcomes among the matched groups.ResultsOverall, OLA users showed significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) than BEV users (median, 23.8 vs. 17.4 months; p=0.004). Before matching, PFS improved in the OLA intent group but marginal statistical significance (p=0.057). After matching, multivariate analyses adjusting confounders identified intention-to-treat OLA as an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS in the OLA 65P (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.505; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.280−0.911; p=0.023) to OLA 100P (aHR=0.348; 95% CI=0.184−0.658; p=0.001) datasets. The aHR of intention-to-treat OLA for recurrence decreased with increasing proportions of OLA users. No differences in overall survival were observed between the BEV and OLA intent groups, and between the BEV and OLA users.ConclusionCompared to BEV, intention-to-treat OLA and actual use of OLA maintenance therapy were significantly associated with decreased disease recurrence risk in patients with BRCA-mutated, PSR HGSOC.     

Statin use and kidney cancer survival outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundStatin use has been associated with improved survival outcomes in various malignancies. Randomized controlled trials are currently underway evaluating their utility as adjunctive cancer therapies. However, studies evaluating the association between statin use and outcomes in kidney cancer yield conflicting results.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies evaluating the association between statin use and kidney cancer survival outcomes. We evaluated risk of bias with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. We pooled hazard ratios for recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival using random-effects models. We evaluated publication bias through Begg’s and Egger’s tests, and the trim and fill procedure.ResultsWe identified 12 studies meeting inclusion criteria and summarized data from 18,105 patients. No study was considered to be at high risk of bias. Statin use was not significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (pooled HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89–1.06) or progression-free survival (pooled HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.51–1.65); however, statin use was associated with marked improvements in cancer-specific survival (pooled HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47–0.94) and overall survival (pooled HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63–0.88). There was no strong evidence of publication bias for any outcome.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that statin use among patients with kidney cancer is associated with significantly improved cancer-specific and overall survival. Further studies are needed to confirm the therapeutic role of statins in kidney cancer.     

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a prognostic factor in older adult patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy with tri-weekly cisplatin

IntroductionConcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) in the definitive setting. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a screening tool to predict the risk of morbidity and mortality in the older adult. Nutritional management is key during CCRT but the association between prognosis and initial nutritional status in older adults with LAHNC undergoing CCRT remains unknown.Materials and MethodsPatients ≥65 years old with LAHNC who received definitive CCRT with cisplatin (80 mg/m² or 100 mg/m², every three weeks, three times) between 2012 and 2018 were included. Patients without completion of radiotherapy were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the GNRI (≦98 or > 98). Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was adopted to identify prognostic factors. GNRI, sex, T and N categories were prespecified as variables for multivariable analysis.ResultsThe median age of 111 patients (88 male, 79%) was 69 years (interquartile range: 67–71), among which 23 patients had low GNRI (20 male, 87%) and 88 patients had high GNRI (68 male, 77%). Baseline clinical characteristics were not statistically different between the two groups. OS was significantly worse in the low GNRI group than in the high GNRI group (p = 0.048). There was no statistical difference in EFS between the two groups (p = 0.12). Multivariable analysis revealed that low GNRI (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.17, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.12–8.96, p = 0.029) and higher N category (HR: 4.37, 95% CI: 1.58–12.06, p = 0.004) were associated with worse OS. For EFS, the higher N category was significantly associated with a worse outcome (HR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.16–5.59, p = 0.02).DiscussionPoorer nutritional status before initiation of CCRT was associated with worse OS in older adults with LAHNC in the definitive setting. The GNRI is a convenient tool for predicting OS in older adult patients with LAHNC treated with CCRT.     

Liposome-paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of liposome-paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).Patients and methodsSeventy-nine consecutive patients treated with liposome-paclitaxel based concurrent chemoradiotherapy between January 2015 and December 2019 at Cancer hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang cancer hospital) were enrolled in this study. The overall response, toxicities, progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed with SPSS software.ResultsA total of 302 cycles of weekly chemotherapy were delivered, with a median 4 courses. After concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), the efficacy was classified as CR in 4 cases (5.1%), PR in 22 cases (28.2%) and SD in 51 cases (65.4%). The median PFS and OS time were 18.2 months and 23.4 months. The 3-year PFS and OS rates were 45.1% and 43.6%, respectively.ConclusionsLiposome-paclitaxel and carboplatin concurrent with radiotherapy is a safe and effective modality for locally advanced ESCC. Further clinical investigation are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen.     

Arginine,glutamine, and fish oil supplementation in cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A randomized control study

We evaluated the effectiveness of arginine, glutamine, and fish oil supplementation in patients’ ability to adhere to the planned regimen and associated toxicities in patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Eighty-eight cancer patients were randomized into 2 groups, A; regular diet and B; regular diet plus nutritional supplementation during their CCRT course. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between toxicity and the study groups. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were used to compare between the 2 groups. Among 88 patients, 45%, 32%, and 23% were head and neck cancer, esophageal cancer, and cervical cancer patients, respectively. Significantly higher grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities were found in group A than in group B (23% vs 5%, P= 0.03). The CCRT completion rate was lower in group A than in group B (75% vs 91%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P= 0.09). Adjusted for type of cancer and age, group B patients were associated with lower hematologic toxicities of CCRT, P= 0.03. Two-year overall survival was 47% for group A, and 61% for group B, P= 0.22. In conclusion, incidence of severe hematologic toxicities were significantly lower in patients with arginine, glutamine, and fish oil supplementation during CCRT. These findings, therefore, need further studies on the isocaloric design.     

Statin-independent prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving rituximab plus CHOP therapy

BackgroundA recent laboratory study indicated that statins impaired the antitumor effects of rituximab by inducing conformational changes in CD20. Although these findings raised significant concerns about statin use during rituximab treatment, their clinical significance is unclear.Patients and methodsWe conducted a retrospective study investigating the effects of statins on the prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP). Newly diagnosed DLBCL patients were analyzed (n = 256), including 35 patients taking statins.ResultsThe 3-year progression-free survival rates were 84% and 73% (P = 0.38), while the overall survival rates were 89% and 78% (P = 0.28) for those patients treated with and without statins, respectively. After adjusting for the International Prognostic Index and serum cholesterol level, statin use was not associated with prognosis.ConclusionsThese results indicate that statins do not influence the clinical prognosis of DLBCL treated with RCHOP. Further studies with larger numbers of patients are warranted to confirm the prognostic significance of statins for patients with DLBCL receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy.     

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with enteral nutrition support: a radical treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with malignant fistulae

Background:Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) significantly increases the survival rate of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with malignant fistulae.Recent clinical evidence has shown the benefits of enteral nutrition for malnourished cancer patients.In this study,we aimed to validate that,with the support of enteral nutrition,ESCC patients who develop malignant fistulae might be able to complete CCRT and achieve long-term survival.Methods:We reviewed the medical records of 652 patients with ESCC who received definitive CCRT at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2010 and December 2012.Treatment outcome and toxicity were retrospectively evaluated in 40 ESCC patients with malignant fistulae.All the 40 patients were treated with CCRT and evaluated by clinical nutritionists using nutrition risk screening (NRS) before,during,and after treatment.Twenty-two patients received a nasogastric tube,and 18 underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding.The median energy intake was 2166 kcal/day.Treatment response was evaluated at 3 months after the completion of CCRT.Results:With a median follow-up of 18 months (range,3-39 months),patients' 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 62.5％,and the estimated OS time was 25.5 months.Univariate analysis showed that the NRS score (P =0.003),increase in NRS score (P =0.024),fistula closure (P =0.011),and response to treatment (P ＜ 0.001) were significantly associated with OS.Multivariate analysis showed that tumor response (P =0.044) and increase in NRS score (P =0.044) were independent predictors of OS.Grade 3 vomiting was observed in 8 patients (20.0％),grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 11 patients (27.5％),and grade 3 cough was observed in 13 patients (32.5％);2 patients (5.0％) died of massive bleeding during treatment.Conclusions:CCRT combined with enteral nutrition support is effective for ESCC patients with malignant fistulae.Patients have an increased potential to be cured,especially those who experience complete response and have an increase in NRS score.Careful observation and nutrition support are required for patients with advanced T-category ESCC who undergo CCRT.     

Chemoimmunotherapy vs. Immunotherapy for First Line Treatment of Advanced Non–small Cell Lung Cancer With a PD-L1 Expression ≥50% or ≥90%

BackgroundEvidence about the comparative effectiveness of chemoimmunotherapy vs. immunotherapy alone in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) and high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) or very high PD-L1 expression (≥90%) is limited because of the lack of head-to-head clinical trials.ObjectiveTo compare survival in aNSCLC patients receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy vs. immunotherapy in both the PD-L1 expression ≥50% or ≥90% subgroups, accounting for potential confounders that may influence physician decision-making.MethodsThis cohort study used a nationwide electronic health record derived database to identify newly diagnosed cases of aNSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression of ≥50% who initiated first-line systemic therapy between October 2016 and October 2021.The exposure of interest was first-line therapy with chemoimmunotherapy or immunotherapy among patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% or ≥90%.Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. Propensity score-based inverse probability of weighting (IPW) was used to control for confounding. Because of nonproportionality of hazards, we estimated hazard ratios over the first 6 months and after 6 months for the overall cohort, and over the first 12 months and after 12 months for a subgroup of persons with a PD-L1 expression ≥90%.ResultsWe identified 3086 subjects who met inclusion criteria, of whom 32% received chemoimmunotherapy and 68% received immunotherapy alone. Chemoimmunotherapy was associated with no survival advantage vs. immunotherapy alone during the entire follow-up period (IPW-adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 0.98, 95% CI, 0.86-1.12), but was associated with a survival benefit during the first 6 months (aHR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.61-0.90). Similarly, in the subgroup of patients with a PD-L1 expression ≥90%, chemoimmunotherapy was associated with no overall survival advantage during the entire follow-up period (aHR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.87-1.22), but was associated with a survival benefit during the first 12 months (aHR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.57-0.97).ConclusionChemoimmunotherapy was not associated with an overall benefit over immunotherapy alone, although was associated with an early survival advantage in both the overall cohort and the subgroup of patients with a PD-L1 expression ≥90%. Future studies should focus on identifying the characteristics of higher risk patients that may benefit from the addition of chemotherapy.     

A randomized phase III trial comparing induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone as treatment of unresectable head and neck cancer

BackgroundConcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for patients with unresectable, nonmetastatic locoregionally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LASCCHN). This randomized, open-label, phase III clinical trial compared the efficacy between standard CCRT and two different induction chemotherapy (ICT) regimens followed by CCRT.Patients and methodsPatients with untreated LASCCHN were randomly assigned to ICT (three cycles), with either docetaxel (Taxotere), cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF arm) or cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF arm), followed by CCRT [7 weeks of radiotherapy (RT) with cisplatin 100 mg/m² on days 1, 22 and 43]; or 7 weeks of CCRT alone. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF).ResultsIn the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 439), the median PFS times were 14.6 (95% CI, 11.6–20.4), 14.3 (95% CI, 11.8–19.3) and 13.8 months (95% CI, 11.0–17.5) at TPF-CCRT, PF-CCRT and CCRT arms, respectively (log-rank P = 0.56). The median TTF were 7.9 (95% CI, 5.9–11.8), 7.9 (95% CI, 6.5–11.8) and 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.7–12.6) for TPF-CCRT, PF-CCRT and CCRT alone, respectively (log-rank P = 0.90). There were no statistically significant differences for overall survival (OS). Toxic effects from ICT-CCRT were manageable.ConclusionOverall, this trial failed to show any advantage of ICT-CCRT over CCRT alone in patients with unresectable LASCCHN (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00261703).