Kinematics of ACL and anterolateral ligament. Part II: anterolateral and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

To quantify the influence of Single-Bundle with Lateral Plasty and Double-Bundle reconstruction on static and dynamic laxity in combined ACL- and ALL-deficient knees.

Methods

The study included 10 fresh-frozen human knees. The joints were analyzed in the following conditions: ACL?+?ALL resection, Single-Bundle with Lateral Plasty (SBLP) reconstruction, Double-Bundle (DB) reconstruction. Testing parameters were: anterior displacement at 30° and 90° of flexion (AP30, AP90) applying a manual maximum load; internal rotation at 30° and 90° of flexion (INT30, INT90) applying a 5 Nm torque and acceleration and internal rotation Pivot-Shift (PS) test. Kinematics was acquired by a navigation system. Paired Student’s t test was conducted to assess statistical difference (P?<?0.05).

Results

At both 30° and 90° of knee flexion, both SBLP and DB surgical techniques showed a significant reduction (P?<?0.01) of anterior–posterior tibial displacement compared to the resection of ACL?+?ALL. At 30° on knee flexion it is the SBLP that allows the greatest reduction of internal rotational laxity when compared to DB reconstruction. Concerning the PS test, only SBPL procedure had a significant laxity decrease considering the acceleration reached by the joint when compared with the ACL?+?ALL state (P?<?0.01).

Conclusion

Clinical relevance of this study is that the internal rotation and PS test were more efficiently controlled by the SBLP technique than by the DB one at both 30° and 90° of flexion in case of ACL?+?ALL lesions.

     

Image-matching technique can detect rotational and AP instabilities in chronic ACL-deficient knees

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to quantify rotational and antero-posterior instabilities using biplanar image-matching technique.

Methods

Biplanar radiographs of both chronic ACL-deficient knees and contralateral uninjured knees were taken in the pivot shift test and in the “giving way position” and lateral radiographs in stress arthrometer at 30° and 90°. Three-dimensional knee models were constructed using computed tomography. Using biplanar image-matching technique, the external rotational angle and the translation of the center of the both condyles of the femur were analyzed.

Results

The external rotation angle of geometric center axis in the pivot shift test was 16.9° ± 5.6° and 10.9° ± 7.3° (P = 0.004), and in the “giving way position” was 16.1° ± 5.7° and 10.7° ± 6.6° (P = 0.004) in ACL-deficient knees and intact knees, respectively. In the pivot shift test, the medial and the lateral femoral condylar centers of ACL-deficient knees were translated 1.2 ± 5.1 mm anteriorly and 3.9 ± 3.4 mm posteriorly, respectively, and in the “giving way position,” 2.0 ± 3.7 mm anteriorly and 2.9 ± 2.6 mm posteriorly, respectively. In stress arthrometer at 30°, the medial and the lateral femoral condylar center translated 7.1 ± 6.0 and 6.6 ± 4.8 mm posteriorly (n.s.), respectively, and at 90° translated 2.7 ± 3.4 and 2.6 ± 3.5 mm posteriorly (n.s.), respectively.

Conclusion

Rotational instability was evaluable in the pivot shift test and in the “giving way position.” Translation of both condylar centers was similar in stress arthrometry. The image-matching technique is able to quantify dynamic rotational and antero-posterior instabilities with static parameters in ACL-deficient knees.

Level of evidence

III.

     

Sectioning the anterolateral ligament did not increase tibiofemoral translation or rotation in an ACL-deficient cadaveric model

Purpose

The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been proposed as a possible extra-articular stabiliser of the knee. Injury to the ALL may result in residual instability following surgical reconstruction of a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Few studies have evaluated the biomechanical role of the ALL. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether sectioning the ALL would have an influence on tibiofemoral translation or rotation during the anterior drawer, Lachman, pivot shift, external rotation, and internal rotation tests in an ACL-deficient knee.

Methods

Only whole-body specimens having an ALL were included in this study. Lachman, anterior drawer, external rotation, and internal rotation tests were performed manually. Pivot shift test was done using a mechanised pivot shifter. The amount of tibiofemoral translation and rotation was recorded by a navigation system. Each specimen was tested in its native state, after sectioning the ACL, and after combined sectioning of the ACL and the ALL.

Results

In six out of 14 cadaveric knees, an ALL could be identified. The ACL-deficient knee had significantly more tibiofemoral translation and rotation compared to the native knee (P < 0.05). However, no changes in the magnitudes of translation or rotation were seen after subsequent sectioning of the ALL compared to the ACL-deficient knee (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Adding an ALL lesion in an ACL-deficient knee did not increase tibiofemoral instability in this cadaveric model. It remains unclear whether injury to the ALL would result in substantial knee instability in the setting of ACL injury in vivo. Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the role of the ALL during knee kinematics and to determine in which scenarios ALL repair would be warranted. Understanding the function of the ALL may improve the current treatment strategies for ACL ruptures.

     

Knee laxity modifications after ACL rupture and surgical intra- and extra-articular reconstructions: intra-operative measures in reconstructed and healthy knees

Purpose

Quantifying the effects of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency on knee joint laxity is fundamental for understanding the outcomes of its reconstruction techniques. The general aim of this study was to determine intra-operatively the main modifications in knee laxity before and after standard isolated intra-articular and additional extra-articular anterolateral reinforcement. Our main hypothesis was that laxity abnormalities, particularly axial rotation, can still result from these ACL reconstruction techniques.

Methods

Thirty-two patients with primary ACL deficiency were analysed by a navigation system immediately before and after each of the two reconstructions. Laxity measurements in terms of knee translations and rotations were taken during the anteroposterior drawer test, with internal–external rotation at 20° and 90° of flexion, and varus–valgus and pivot-shift tests. All these laxity measures were also taken originally from the contralateral healthy knee.

Results

With respect to the contralateral healthy knee, in the ACL-deficient knee significantly increased laxity (expressed in %) was found in the medial compared with that of the lateral compartment, respectively, 115 and 68 % in the drawer test at 20° flexion, and 55 and 46 % at 90° flexion. In the medial compartment, a significant 35 % increment was also observed for the coupled tibial anteroposterior translation during axial knee rotation at 20° of flexion. After isolated intra-articular reconstruction, normal values of anteroposterior laxity were found restored in the pivot-shift and drawer tests in the lateral compartment, but not fully in the medial compartment. After the reinforcement, laxity in the medial compartment was also found restored in the axial rotation test at 20° flexion.

Conclusion

In ACL reconstruction, with respect to the contralateral knee, intra-articular plus additional anterolateral reinforcement procedures do not restore normal joint laxity. This combined procedure over-constrained the lateral compartment, while excessive laxity still persists at the medial one.

Level of evidence

III.

     

Kinematics of ACL and anterolateral ligament. Part I: Combined lesion

Purpose

To quantify the influence of ALL lesions on static and dynamic laxity in ACL-deficient knee.

Methods

The study was performed in 10 fresh-frozen knees. The joints were analysed in the following conditions: intact, ACL resection and ACL + ALL resection. Testing parameters were defined as: anterior displacement at 30° and 90° of flexion (AP30, AP90) applying a manual-maximum load; internal rotation at 30° and 90° of flexion (INT30, INT90) applying a 5 N m torque and internal rotation and acceleration during manual pivot-shift (PS) test. Kinematics was acquired by a navigation system; a testing rig and a torquemeter were used to control the limb position and the applied torque. Paired Student’s t test was conducted to assess statistical difference, and significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

The ALL resection determined a significant increase in terms of internal rotation (INT30 P = 0.02, INT90 P = 0.03), while AP30 (P n.s) and AP90 (P n.s) were not affected. ALL resection produced a significant increase in terms of acceleration during PS test (P < 0.01), but no significant change in PS internal rotation was observed.

Conclusion

The ALL plays a significant role in controlling static internal rotation and acceleration during PS test. On the other hand, ALL resection did not produce any significant change in terms of anterior displacement. A trend was seen for the internal rotation during the pivot-shift test to increase after ALL resection was higher when compared to the intact and isolated ACL lesion states; however, the differences were not significant. The results highlight the clinical relevance of this structure that should be assessed before an ACL reconstruction in order to avoid residual laxity.

     

Assessing coronal laxity in extension and flexion at a minimum of 10 years after primary total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

Favourable long-term results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) require appropriate soft tissue balance. However, the relationships between long-term results after TKA surgery and mediolateral laxities at extension and at 90° flexion remain unknown. This study therefore quantitatively assessed ligament balance at extension and at 90° knee flexion at least 10 years after primary TKA, as well as clarifying the relationships between long-term outcomes and mediolateral laxities.

Methods

This study included 49 knees (19 CR type and 30 PS type) of 33 patients followed up for at least 10 years after TKA at our hospital. Plain radiographs were obtained with about 150 N of varus or valgus stress using a Telos arthrometer at extension. At 90° flexion, epicondylar views were obtained under a 1.5-kg load and with about 10 kg of varus or valgus stress.

Results

Lateral laxity of about 5° was observed in both extension and flexion, with total laxities of varus and valgus stress each less than 10°. Postoperative clinical outcomes were good, with significant improvements in extension angle, femorotibial angle, and KSS, and no loosening in any knee.

Conclusions

Good long-term results of TKA can be obtained with a lateral laxity of about 5°, equivalent to that of healthy knees.

Level of evidence

III.

     

Repair of the lateral posterior meniscal root improves stability in an ACL-deficient knee

Purpose

To investigate the stabilizing effect of a lateral meniscus posterior root repair in an ACL and root deficient knee.

Methods

The hypothesis of the current study was that a sequential transection of the posterior root and the meniscofemoral ligaments in an ACL-deficient knee increases rotational instability, and conversely, a repair of the meniscus root reduces the internal tibial rotation. Therefore, eight human knee joints were tested in a robotic setup (5 N m internal torque, 50 N m anterior translation load). Five conditions were tested: intact, ACL cut, ACL cut?+?lateral meniscus posterior root tear (LMRT), ACL cut?+?LMRT?+?transection of the MFL and ACL cut?+?lateral meniscus root repair. The angles of internal tibial rotation as well as anterior tibial translation were recorded.

Results

Transection of the lateral meniscus posterior root increased the internal tibial instability as compared to the ACL-insufficient state. A significant increase was detected in 60° and 90° of flextion. Sectioning of the meniscofemoral ligament further destabilized the knees significantly at all flexion angles as compared to the ACL-deficient state. Even in 30°, 60° and 90° a significant difference was detected as compared to the isolated root tear. A tibial fixation of the lateral meniscus root reduced the internal tibial rotation in all flexion angles and led to a significant decrease of internal tibial rotation in 30° and 90° as compared to the transection of the root and the MFL. The anterior tibial translation was increased in all conditions as compared to the native state.

Conclusion

A lateral meniscus root repair can reduce internal tibial rotation in the ACL-deficient knee. To check the condition of the lateral posterior meniscus root attachment is clinical relevant as a lateral meniscus root repair might improve rotational stability.

     

Functional biomechanical performance of a novel anatomically shaped polycarbonate urethane total meniscus replacement

Purpose

To evaluate the functional biomechanical performance of a novel anatomically shaped, polycarbonate urethane total meniscus implant.

Methods

Five human cadaveric knees were flexed between 0° and 90° under compressive loads mimicking a squat movement. Anteroposterior (AP) laxity tests were performed in 30° and 90° flexion. Meniscal kinematics and knee laxity were quantified using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Tibial cartilage contact mechanics were determined in 90° flexion. Measurements were repeated for the native medial meniscus, the implant, after total medial meniscectomy and allograft transplantation.

Results

The implant and allograft displayed increased posterior and medial displacements compared to the native meniscus, yet no differences were found between the implant and allograft. Meniscal condition did not affect rotational laxity. Compared to the native joint, AP laxity for the implant was increased in 30° flexion, but not in 90°. The implant reduced the mean contact pressure compared to meniscectomy but could not restore contact pressures to native meniscus levels. Compared to the native meniscus, the implant significantly increased the peak pressure, while the contact area was reduced. Contact mechanics of the implant and allograft were never statistically different.

Conclusions

Biomechanical performance was similar for the implant and allograft. However, both meniscal replacements could not restore outcomes to native meniscus levels or sufficiently improve outcomes after meniscectomy. This was presumably caused by the mobility allowed by the suture-only horn fixation. The similarity of implant and allograft performance suggests that the novel implant has the biomechanical potential to serve as an alternative to meniscal allograft transplantation.

     

Changes in anteroposterior stability and proprioception after different types of knee arthroplasty

Purpose

To compare different types of knee arthroplasty, in selected patients with a knee score above 80 points, for their post-operative changes in anteroposterior (AP) laxity and proprioception.

Methods

Four groups of each ten patients were tested for AP translation after different types of arthroplasty with a KT-1000 device at 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion. Proprioception of the joint was evaluated by joint position sense with three different tests. Clinical outcome of stability and proprioceptive testing was analysed by comparing the results of three (KSS, KOOS and FJS-12) patient-reported outcome measurement scores (PROMS) for each of the different implant types.

Results

Anteroposterior laxity was observed at 30° and 90° of flexion for the two PS TKA designs included in this study, but not for the UKA or the medial pivot design. All knee designs, except UKA, had an increased laxity at 60° of flexion. Proprioceptive testing was inconclusive. PROMS were not able to identify differences in clinical outcome among different knee designs in these selected patients, despite observed differences in AP laxity.

Conclusion

Increased AP laxity is a result of the surgical procedure in knee arthroplasty. UKA is the only design mimicking native laxity of the knee. A medial pivot design can obtain the same result as UKA at 30° and 90° of flexion, but not at the importantly cited 60° of flexion as tested under non-load-bearing conditions. The clinical relevance of this study is that despite of an important range of AP translations among the different knee designs, good-to-excellent patient-reported outcome was observed within the findings of this study.

Level of evidence

II.

     

The shape and orientation of the trochlea run more parallel to the posterior condylar line than generally believed

Purpose

This study was set up to identify the native trochlear geometry and define its relationship with the rotational landmarks of the distal femur.

Methods

The rotational landmarks of the distal femur were analysed on CT-scans of 281 patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis.

Results

The anterior trochlear line (ATL) was on average 4.3° (SD 3.3°) internally rotated relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA). The ATL was on average 2.1° (SD 3.0°) internally rotated relative to the posterior condylar line (PCL). The relationship between the ATL and the sTEA was statistically different in the different coronal alignment groups (p = 0.004): 3.9° (SD 3.0°) in varus knees, 4.0° (SD 2.9°) in neutral knees and 5.4° (SD 3.8°) in valgus knees. The lateralisation of the trochlea, represented by the distance between the perpendicular to PCL and the perpendicular to the posterior parallel line to the sTEA, was on average 2.2 mm (SD 1.8 mm).

Conclusion

The ATL was on average 4.3° (SD 3.3°) internally rotated relative to the sTEA and 2.1° (SD 3.0°) internally rotated relative to the PCL. The ATL is more externally orientated in varus knees and more internally rotated in valgus knees. The trochlear groove is lateralised by only 2.2 mm when the femoral component is externally rotated.

Level of evidence

III.

     

Knee hyperextension does not adversely affect dynamic in vivo kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of knee hyperextension on dynamic in vivo kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R).

Methods

Forty-two patients underwent unilateral ACL-R. Twenty-four months after surgery, subjects performed level walking and downhill running on a treadmill while dynamic stereo radiographs were acquired at 100 (walking) and 150 Hz (running). Tibiofemoral motion was determined using a validated model-based tracking process, and tibiofemoral translations/rotations were calculated. The range of tibiofemoral motions from 0 to 10% of the gait cycle (heel strike to early stance phase) and side-to-side difference (SSD) were calculated. Maximum knee extension angle of ACL-reconstructed knees during walking was defined as active knee extension angle in each subject. Correlations between maximum knee extension angle and tibiofemoral kinematics data were evaluated using Spearman’s rho (P < 0.05).

Results

No significant correlation was observed between maximum knee extension angle and the range of anterior tibial translation during functional activities in the ACL-R knees. Maximum knee extension angle was weakly correlated with internal tibial rotation range in ACL-R knee during running (ρ = 0.376, P = 0.014); however, maximum extension angle was not correlated with SSD of internal tibial rotation. SSD of internal tibial rotation was ?0.4° ± 1.9° (walking), ?1.6° ± 3.1° (running), indicating ACL-R restored rotatory knee range of motion during functional movements.

Conclusion

Knee hyperextension was not significantly correlated with greater SSD of anterior translation and internal rotation. The clinical relevance is that knee hyperextension does not adversely affect kinematic outcomes after ACL-R and that physiologic knee hyperextension can be restored after ACL-R when knee hyperextension is present.

Level of evidence

III.

     

Dynamic augmentation restores anterior tibial translation in ACL suture repair: a biomechanical comparison of non-, static and dynamic augmentation techniques

Purpose

There is a lack of objective evidence investigating how previous non-augmented ACL suture repair techniques and contemporary augmentation techniques in ACL suture repair restrain anterior tibial translation (ATT) across the arc of flexion, and after cyclic loading of the knee. The purpose of this work was to test the null hypotheses that there would be no statistically significant difference in ATT after non-, static- and dynamic-augmented ACL suture repair, and they will not restore ATT to normal values across the arc of flexion of the knee after cyclic loading.

Methods

Eleven human cadaveric knees were mounted in a test rig, and knee kinematics from 0° to 90° of flexion were recorded by use of an optical tracking system. Measurements were recorded without load and with 89-N tibial anterior force. The knees were tested in the following states: ACL-intact, ACL-deficient, non-augmented suture repair, static tape augmentation and dynamic augmentation after 10 and 300 loading cycles.

Results

Only static tape augmentation and dynamic augmentation restored ATT to values similar to the ACL-intact state directly postoperation, and maintained this after cyclic loading. However, contrary to dynamic augmentation, the ATT after static tape augmentation failed to remain statistically less than for the ACL-deficient state after cyclic loading. Moreover, after cyclic loading, ATT was significantly less with dynamic augmentation when compared to static tape augmentation.

Conclusion

In contrast to non-augmented ACL suture repair and static tape augmentation, only dynamic augmentation resulted in restoration of ATT values similar to the ACL-intact knee and decreased ATT values when compared to the ACL-deficient knee immediately post-operation and also after cyclic loading, across the arc of flexion, thus allowing the null hypotheses to be rejected. This may assist healing of the ruptured ACL. Therefore, this study would support further clinical evaluation of dynamic augmentation of ACL repair.

     

Tibiofemoral forces for the native and post-arthroplasty knee: relationship to maximal laxity through a functional arc of motion

Purpose

Accurate soft tissue balance must be achieved to improve functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Sensor-integrated tibial trials have been introduced that allow real-time measurement of tibiofemoral kinematics during TKA. This study examined the interplay between tibiofemoral force and laxity, under defined intraoperative conditions, so as to quantify the kinematic behaviour of the CR femoral single-radius knee.

Methods

TKA was undertaken in eight loaded cadaveric specimens. Computer navigation in combination with sensor data defined laxity and tibiofemoral contact force, respectively, during manual laxity testing. Fixed-effect linear modelling allowed quantification of the effect for flexion angle, direction of movement and TKA implantation upon the knee.

Results

An inverse relationship between laxity and contact force was demonstrated. With flexion, laxity increased as contact force decreased under manual stress. Change in laxity was significant beyond 30° for coronal plane laxity and beyond 60° for rotatory laxity (p < 0.01). Rotational stress in mid-flexion demonstrated the greatest mismatch in inter-compartmental forces. Contact point position over the tibial sensor demonstrated paradoxical roll-forward with knee flexion.

Conclusion

Traditional balancing techniques may not reliably equate to uniform laxity or contact forces across the tibiofemoral joint through a range of flexion and argue for the role of per-operative sensor use to aid final balancing of the knee.

     

Varus femoral and tibial coronal alignments result in different kinematics and kinetics after total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

Abnormal knee motion under various conditions has been described after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, differences in kinematics and kinetics of knees with varus femoral versus varus tibial alignment have not been evaluated. It was hypothesized that varus femoral and tibial alignments have the same impact on knee motion.

Methods

A musculoskeletal computer simulation was used. Femoral and tibial alignment in the coronal plane was each varied from neutral to 5° of varus in 1° increments. Lift-off, defined as an intercomponent distance of >2 mm, and tibiofemoral contact forces were evaluated during gait up to 60° of knee flexion. Knee kinematics and contact stresses were also examined during squat, with up to 130° of knee flexion.

Results

During gait, lift-off occurred readily with more than 3° of varus tibial alignment and slight lateral joint laxity. In contrast, lift-off did not occur with varus femoral or tibial alignment of up to 5° during squat. Peak medial contact forces with varus femoral alignment were approximately twice those observed with varus tibial alignment. The lowest points of the femoral condyles moved internally with varus femoral alignment, contrary to the kinematics with neutral or varus tibial alignment. On the other hand, there was femoral medial sliding and edge loading against the tibia in mid-flexion with varus tibial alignment.

Conclusion

Varus femoral alignment affects the non-physiological rotational movement of the tibiofemoral joint, whereas varus tibial alignment causes medial–lateral instability during mid-flexion. Varus femoral and tibial alignments might lead to post-TKA discomfort and unreliability.

     

Femoral rotation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of patient individualized jigs with gap balancing in relation to anatomic landmarks

Purpose

The purpose of our study was to compare the accuracy of the rotational position of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty aligned with patient individualized jigs (PSJ) to a gap balancing technique (GBT).

Methods

A consecutive series of 21 osteoarthritic patients were treated with 22 cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. During surgery, the rotation of the femoral component pinholes was recorded for all knees using PSJ and GBT and transferred to computer tomograms (CT). The rotational differences between PSJ and GBT relative to the transepicondylar axis were analysed.

Results

The medium rotation of the femoral component pinholes was 1.3° ± 5.1° (min = ?6.3°; max = 14.4°) for PSJ and 0.1 ± 1.4° (min = ?1.6°; max = 3.4°) for GBT. Outliers of more than 3° were found more frequently with PSJ in 12 cases but only in one for GBT.

Conclusion

Based on our study, we would not recommend relying intra-operatively solely on the CT-based PSJ without the option to adjust or control femoral rotation.

Level of evidence

II.

     

Combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament associated with anterolateral tenodesis effectively controls the acceleration of the tibia during the pivot shift

Purpose

The pivot shift test is quantified subjectively during assessment of patients presenting with suspected Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) tears and has a low interobserver reproducibility. The Kinematic Rapid Assessment (KiRA) is a triaxial accelerometer that makes it possible to non-invasively quantify tibial acceleration during the pivot shift test. Abolishing pivot shift is considered to be a key element in surgical reconstruction but is incomplete in 25–38% of patients.

Methods

Patients were included prospectively. Inclusion criteria were patients requiring ACL reconstruction associated with at least one of the following factors corresponding to the patient who have a high risk of rupture either by their sports activity, a failure case, or the notion of important rotational laxity: the patient practiced a competitive pivot-contact sport, revision ACL reconstruction (besides STG (semitendinosus-gracilis graft) repair), subjective explosive rotational laxity, Segond fracture, and TELOS value of >10 mm. Standardized pre- and postoperative pivot shift tests were immediately performed under anesthesia in both knees.

Results

Forty-three patients were included. Mean preoperative variations in tibial acceleration in the healthy and injured knees were 1.2?±?0.1 and 2.7?±?0.3 m/s², respectively, p?<?0.01. A statistically significant decrease in immediate postoperative mean variations in acceleration in the injured knee occurred: 1.5?±?0.3 m/s², p?<?0.01. There was no longer any statistical difference between postoperative contralateral healthy knees and operated knees (n.s).

Conclusions

Combined ACL reconstruction associated with anterolateral tenodesis suppress acute pathologic tibial acceleration in the pivot shift.

Level of evidence

III.

     

Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction outperforms any types of single bundle ACL reconstructions in controlling dynamic rotational laxity

Purpose

To compare the different types of ACL reconstructions in terms of knee dynamic laxity evaluated by acceleration.

Methods

Sixteen fresh frozen cadaveric knees were used. Pivot shift test was manually performed while monitoring the tibial acceleration by use of a triaxial accelerometer. The test was repeated before and after the ACL resection and reconstruction. Three types of ACL reconstruction were tested: (1) Anatomic Single-Bundle reconstruction (n = 8), the graft was placed at the center of the ACL footprint for the both femoral and tibial sides (tunnel diameter: 8mm); (2) Conventional Single-Bundle reconstruction (n = 8), the graft was placed from the tibial PL footprint to femoral high AM position (tunnel diameter: 8mm) and (3) Anatomic Double-Bundle reconstruction (n = 8). The acceleration in each of three x-y-z directions and the overall magnitude of acceleration was calculated to evaluate dynamic rotational laxity and compared between different ACL reconstructions.

Results

The overall magnitude of acceleration was significantly different between ACL intact and deficient knees (p < 0.0001). The acceleration was reduced by the DB ACL reconstruction to the intact level (n.s.), but the two SB ACL reconstruction failed to achieve the intact level of the acceleration (p = 0.0002non-anatomic SB, p < 0.0001 anatomic SB).

Conclusion

The anatomic DB reconstruction better restores dynamic rotational laxity when compared to the SB ACL reconstructions no matter if the tunnel placement was anatomic. The anatomic DB reconstruction better restores dynamic rotational laxity when compared to both anatomic and non-anatomic SB ACL reconstruction. For this reason anatomic DB ACL reconstruction is recommended for cases where rotational laxity is an issue.

     

Restoring tibiofemoral alignment during ACL reconstruction results in better knee biomechanics

Purpose

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) aims to restore normal knee joint function, stability and biomechanics and in the long term avoid joint degeneration. The purpose of this study is to present the anatomic single bundle (SB) ACLR that emphasizes intraoperative correction of tibiofemoral subluxation that occurs after ACL injury. It was hypothesized that this technique leads to optimal outcomes and better restoration of pathological tibiofemoral joint movement that results from ACL deficiency (ACLD).

Methods

Thirteen men with unilateral ACLD were prospectively evaluated before and at a mean follow-up of 14.9 (SD?=?1.8) months after anatomic SB ACLR with bone patellar tendon bone autograft. The anatomic ACLR replicated the native ACL attachment site anatomy and graft orientation. Emphasis was placed on intraoperative correction of tibiofemoral subluxation by reducing anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal tibial rotation. Function was measured with IKDC, Lysholm and the Tegner activity scale, ATT was measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer and tibial rotation (TR) kinematics were measured with 3Dmotion analysis during a high-demand pivoting task.

Results

The results showed significantly higher TR of the ACL-deficient knee when compared to the intact knee prior to surgery (12.2° ± 3.7° and 10.7° ± 2.6° respectively, P?=?0.014). Postoperatively, the ACLR knee showed significantly lower TR as compared to the ACL-deficient knee (9.6°±3.1°, P?=?0.001) but no difference as compared to the control knee (n.s.). All functional scores were significantly improved and ATT was restored within normal values (P?<?0.001).

Conclusions

Intraoperative correction of tibiofemoral subluxation that results after ACL injury is an important step during anatomic SB ACLR. The intraoperative correction of tibiofemoral subluxation along with the replication of native ACL anatomy results in restoration of rotational kinematics of ACLD patients to normal levels that are comparable to the control knee. These results indicate that the reestablishment of tibiofemoral alignment during ACLR may be an important step that facilitates normal knee kinematics postoperatively.

Level of evidence

Level II, prospective cohort study.

     

A new technique in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with implant-free tibial fixation

Purpose

This case-series outcome study presents a surgical technique for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with 4-tunnel using two interference screws. There was a 2-year minimum follow-up.

Methods

From January to December 2009, an ACL 4-tunnel, anatomic, double-bundle reconstruction was performed on 27 patients. Double-strand hamstring tendon grafts were used in each femoral tunnel as well as two interference screws. Tibial fixation was insured through manual tension, by tying non-absorbable sutures on the bone bridge between the two tunnels at 20° of knee flexion. Clinical assessments included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee scores, range of motion (ROM), pivot-shift test, single-leg hop, and quadriceps-hamstrings strength tests using a hand-held dynamometer. Anterior knee laxity was also assessed using a rolimeter. A single examiner performed all testing pre-operatively at 6 months and during the 2-year follow-up.

Results

All patients were assessed during the 2-year follow-up. At that time, 92 % of the patients presented normal anterior laxity (average, 1.3 ± 0.5 mm) and rotational knee stability. No statistical side-to-side difference was found for ROM, muscle strength, single-leg hop, and function (n.s.). All patients presented a normal knee function according to the IKDC and the Lysholm score. In addition, no infection, graft failure, or pain were observed at the harvesting site.

Conclusion

The study shows that satisfactory results in relation to knee laxity, function, and strength can be achieved with the implant-free tibial fixation in the ACL double-bundle reconstruction with two interference screws.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic case series, Level IV.

     

Anterolateral ligament anatomy: a comparative anatomical study

Purpose

Some anatomical studies have indicated that the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee is distinct ligamentous structure in humans. The purpose of this study is to compare the lateral anatomy of the knee among human and various animal specimens.

Methods

Fifty-eight fresh-frozen knee specimens, from 24 different animal species, were used for this anatomical study. The same researchers dissected all the specimens in this study, and dissections were performed in a careful and standardized manner.

Results

An ALL was not found in any of the 58 knees dissected. Another interesting finding in this study is that some primate species (the prosimians: the red and black and white lemurs) have two LCLs.

Conclusion

The clinical relevance of this study is the lack of isolation of the ALL as a unique structure in animal species. Therefore, precaution is recommended before assessing the need for surgery to reconstruct the ALL as a singular ligament.