Twenty-year follow-up of functional treatment with a bionator appliance: A retrospective dental cast analysis

Objective:To investigate changes in dental arch configuration, relationship, and malocclusion directly after Class II malocclusion treatment with a Balters bionator modified by Ascher as well as 20 years after treatment.Materials and Methods:Orthodontic dental cast analysis of 18 patients with skeletal Class II treated with a bionator without any additional fixed therapy was performed with a digital caliper at three stages: before (T0), after (T1) and 20 years after (T2) treatment. Arch perimeter and depth, intermolar and intercanine distance, overjet, overbite, sagittal molar and canine relationship, mandibular incisor irregularity (Little''s index), and malocclusion (PAR index) were assessed.Results:During treatment (T0–T1), upper arch perimeter significantly increased with a significant decrease in the upper and lower arch perimeter long-term (T1–T2), whereas corresponding arch depths changed only slightly in both periods. Transverse intermolar width increased significantly during treatment, remaining almost constant from T1 to T2. Lower intercanine distance remained fairly unchanged during treatment, but decreased significantly during follow-up. Lower incisor irregularity improved slightly during treatment but increased significantly long-term. After treatment, sagittal molar relationships on both sides were improved, overjet and overbite reduced; these significant changes remained stable long-term. The peer assessment rating (PAR) index was significantly lower after treatment and increased insignificantly during follow-up.Conclusions:20 years after bionator treatment without additional fixed appliances, the improved sagittal relationship and the reduced overjet and PAR index remained fairly stable. Long-term changes are most likely due to physiological aging processes and are not associated with bionator treatment.     

Transverse dimensions of dental arches in subjects with Class II malocclusion in the early mixed dentition

Objective

The purpose of this study was to analyze the transverse dentoalveolar features of subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion in mixed dentition when compared to subjects with normal occlusion.

Materials and methods

The study was performed on 192 randomly selected subjects in the early mixed dentition. According to sagittal skeletal and occlusal features the sample was divided into two groups: 88 subjects (53 females and 35 males) with Class II skeletal disharmony and Class II, division 1 malocclusion (Class II Group, mean age 8 years and 10 months ± 11 months) and 104 subjects (66 females e 38 males) with dentoskeletal Class I relationships (Class I Group, mean age 9 ± 1 years). The Class II group was further divided into two subgroups (maxillary protrusion group and mandibular retrusion group) on the basis of the skeletal characteristics. Intermolar and intercanine distances were measured on dental casts in both arches and posterior and anterior transversal discrepancy (PTID and ATID) were calculated.

Results

Subjects with Class II malocclusion showed a significantly greater negative PTID (−2.1 mm) which was associated with a significantly reduced maxillary width with respect to the Class I group (−2.2 mm). The Class II group showed also a significantly greater negative ATID (−1.4 mm) when compared to the Class I group. Subjects with mandibular retrusion showed a significantly greater reduction both in the maxillary intercanine width (−1.7 mm). and in the maxillary intermolar width (−2.7 mm) with respect to the Class I group. Subjects with maxillary protrusion presented with a significantly greater constriction at the maxillary intermolar width (−1.7 mm) when compared to the Class I group.

Conclusions

Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion is associated with a significant constriction of the maxillary arch with reduced intercanine and intermolar widths. When Class II malocclusion is due to a maxillary protrusion the constriction at the maxillary arch is limited to the intermolar width.     

Long-Term Effects of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Followed by Fixed Appliances

Objective:To evaluate the long-term changes in maxillary arch widths, overjet, and overbite in patients who were treated with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) followed by edgewise appliances.Materials and Methods:The material for the study consisted of study casts taken from 41 patients (19 males, 22 females) on four different occasions (before treatment, T1; after RME, T2; after treatment, T3; and during follow-up period, T4). The upper intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths and overjet and overbite were measured on each set of study casts. Mean age of the subjects was 13.2 ± 1.3 years (range, 11.2–16.9 years) at T1, 13.3 ± 1.3 years (range, 11.3–17 years) at T2, 15.5 ± 1.4 years (range, 13.1–18.8 years) at T3, and 20.4 ± 1.6 years (range, 17.9–24.8 years) at T4.Results:The net increase in intercanine width, interpremolar width, intermolar width, overjet, and overbite was 1.4 ± 2.4 mm, 4.6 ± 2.6 mm, 4.3 ± 2.5 mm, 0.1 ± 0.6 mm, and 0.2 ± 0.6 mm, respectively, and the relapse rates were 37% for intercanine width, 19% for interpremolar width, and 17% for intermolar width at the end of the follow-up period.Conclusions:A significant amount of relapse occurred in maxillary arch widths at the postretention assessment, the greatest being in intercanine width. RME significantly decreased overbite and increased overjet, and a statistically significant decrease was observed in both overbite and overjet at the postretention assessment.     

Long-term stability of Class I premolar extraction treatment.

This study evaluates Class I, 4-premolar-extraction patients who were treated with the edgewise appliance by 1 practitioner, according to the philosophy of Tweed, and who had been out of retention a minimum of 5 years. The sample includes 32 patients, who started treatment at an average age of 12.8 years and who were examined a mean of 15 years posttreatment (11.7 years postretention). Cephalometric and model analyses were conducted to evaluate treatment and posttreatment tooth movements. The results showed that irregularity, as measured by the irregularity index, decreased 5.3 mm during treatment and increased 0.7 mm (SD 1.1 mm) during the posttreatment period. Eighty percent of the patients had satisfactory (<3.5 mm) mandibular incisor alignment over 10 years postretention, and none was in the severe category (>6.5 mm). Mandibular intercanine width increased (1.7 mm) during treatment, whereas intermolar width decreased (-2.1 mm). Maxillary molar widths remained unchanged posttreatment, and mandibular intercanine width decreased 1.4 mm from immediately posttreatment to postretention. Arch lengths decreased during treatment because of molar protraction and incisor retraction. Mandibular arch length continued to decrease posttreatment (-1.4 mm) because of mesial molar movement rather than distal incisor movement. Satisfactory long-term results can be achieved for most Class I, 4-premolar-extraction patients for whom evidence-based treatment objectives-including minimal alteration of the mandibular arch form and the retraction and uprighting or maintenance of mandibular incisors in their original position-have been met.     

欧米加阻挡曲扩弓法排齐和整平下颌拥挤牙列效果的临床研究

目的 评价下颌非拔牙病例中,澳丝弯制的欧米加阻挡曲扩弓法在传统直丝弓托槽上排齐和整平下颌拥挤牙列方面的临床效果。方法 选择58例正畸患者,年龄19~24岁,随机均分成2组,各29例,一组接受传统矫治方法,另一组采用欧米加阻挡曲扩弓法矫治。每种矫正方法又分为轻-中度拥挤（5 > Ⅱ > 2）和重度拥挤（Ⅱ > 5）两个亚组。下颌治疗结束时间以下牙弓完全排齐和整平为准。头颅侧位片评价下牙弓排齐和整平前后下切牙位置的变化;模型上测量下尖牙间距和下第一恒磨牙间距以反映牙弓宽度的变化。结果 2种排齐和整平的方法获得了相同程度的前牙区和后牙区扩弓量;就重度拥挤病例而言,欧米加阻挡曲扩弓法要明显快于传统方法（P=0.017）;结论 2种方法无论在切牙的唇向移动程度还是尖牙间距和磨牙间距的扩大情况等各方面几乎获得了同样的效果,对于严重拥挤的牙列,欧米加阻挡曲扩弓装置显示出更高的效率,是非常值得推荐的一种矫正方法。     

Effects of mandibular incisor extraction on anterior occlusion in adults with Class III malocclusion and reduced overbite

The aim of this study was to assess the treatment outcome and changes in mandibular incisor position after extraction of one single incisor in 36 adult orthodontic cases with combined Class III and open bite tendencies. The cases consisted of 21 female and 15 male patients with an average age of 27.8 years (standard deviation [SD], 11.1 years) at the start. Fixed 0.018-inch Edgewise appliances were used in both arches in 19 patients and in the mandibular arch in 17 patients. Average treatment time was 18 months (SD, 7.1 months). Pretreatment ANB was 0.5^o (SD, 2.7°), overjet 1.4 mm (SD, 1.9 mm), and overbite 1.5 mm (SD, 1.1 mm). The lower incisors were 3.6 mm (SD, 2.8 mm) in front of the APg-line, and the Averaged Irregularity Index was 1.1 mm (SD, 0.6 mm). Records representing pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2), and average 4.3 years (SD, 2.3 years) retention (T3) included cephalograms, panoramic films, intraoral and extraoral photographs, and plaster models. All cast measurements were made with digital calipers. On the cephalograms, the lower incisor tips moved posteriorly 1.7 mm (SD, 2.0 mm) and occlusally 1.5 mm (SD, 1.8 mm) from pretreatment to posttreatment. Relative to the x-axis, they tipped lingually 5.9^o (SD, 5.6°). On the cast analysis, overjet increased 1.0 mm (SD, 1.9 mm) and 1.5 mm (SD, 1.5 mm) for the maxillary central and lateral incisors, respectively, whereas overbite increased 0.6 mm for both the central and lateral incisors. The intercanine width was reduced by 3.3 mm (SD, 2.0 mm), while the intermolar width was unchanged. The Average Irregularity Index was reduced from 1.1 to 0.2 mm. Arch-length was reduced 3.6 mm from pretreatment to posttreatment, and another 0.3 mm from posttreatment to 4.3-years retention. Other changes from posttreatment to 4.3-years retention were slight. No loss of the interdental gingival papillae was normally observed. It is concluded that the extraction of one mandibular incisor can lead to satisfactory treatment results in adults with mild Class III malocclusion and reduced overbite, particularly when coupled with a large mandibular intercanine width and minor crowding, and some mandibular tooth size excess. However, the orthodontic treatment frequently became more complicated and time-consuming than expected at the start. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:113-24)     

The Class II Carriere Motion appliance:: A 3D CBCT evaluation of the effects on the dentition

ObjectivesTo determine three-dimensional treatment changes produced by the Class II Carriere Motion appliance (CMA) in Class II adolescent patients with Class I and Class II skeletal relationships.Materials and MethodsThe sample included 59 adolescents (16 boys and 43 girls) with unilateral or bilateral Class II molar and bilateral Class II canine relationship. They were divided into group 1 with skeletal Class I (N = 27; ANB 2.90° ± 1.40°; 13.30 ± 1.53 years) and group 2 with skeletal Class II (N = 32; ANB 6.06° ± 1.64°; 13.26 ± 1.76 years). Cone beam computed tomography images were traced with Invivo software pretreatment (T1) and post-CMA usage (T2). The treatment changes in 36 measurements were calculated in each group, and the changes in 16 measurements were compared between them.ResultsIn group 1 and 2, maxillary first molars underwent significant distal movement (1.92 mm ± 0.80 mm and 1.67 mm ± 1.56 mm, respectively) with distal tipping and rotation, maxillary canines underwent significant distal movement (2.34 mm ± 1.07 mm and 2.24 mm ± 1.91 mm, respectively) with distal tipping and rotation, and mandibular molars underwent significant mesial movement (–1.37 mm ± 1.23 mm and –2.51 mm ± 1.51 mm, respectively) with mesial tipping. Between the groups, there were significant differences in mandibular molar mesial movement and the U1-SN changes (P < .05).ConclusionsThe CMA corrected Class II malocclusion through distal tipping and rotational movement of maxillary canines and molars and corrected mesial tipping of mandibular molars. Significantly more mandibular molar mesial movement and maxillary incisor flaring were observed in patients with skeletal Class II.     

An assessment of conventional and self-ligating brackets in Class I maxillary constriction patients

Objective:To evaluate two different treatment systems with regard to incisor position, transverse dimension changes in maxillary arch, changes in maxillary molar inclinations, clinical periodontal parameters, and pain intensity in patients with a Class I malocclusion.Materials and Methods:Seventeen patients (with a mean age of 14.5 years) underwent orthodontic treatment with the Roth prescribed edgewise bracket systems after expanding the maxillary arch with a quad-helix appliance, and 16 patients (with a mean age of 14.8 years) underwent orthodontic treatment with the Damon 3MX bracket system. Each subject''s lateral cephalometric and posteroanterior radiographs and dental casts were obtained at the beginning of the treatment and after debonding. In addition to these, the periodontal index and pain scores were taken.Results:Cephalometric data showed that in both treatment systems, overjet value decreased and maxillary and mandibular incisors proclined. Posteroanterior measurements demonstrated a greater increase in the maxillary molar inclination in the Damon group. Significant increase of maxillary intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths was shown in both systems. Periodontal index and pain score changes between different observation periods were the same.Conclusions:The conventional and Damon systems were found similar with regard to the incisor position, transverse dimension changes in maxillary arch, clinical periodontal parameters, and pain intensity. The only significant difference was that the Damon system inclined the maxillary molars more buccally than the conventional group.     

Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I,II and III

Objective:To test the hypothesis that no differences exist in dental arch dimensions between dentoalveolar Classes I, II, and III, and between male and female subjects, as measured on virtual three-dimensional (3D) models.Materials and Methods:Samples included randomly selected plaster dental casts of 137 white patients (43 Class I, 50 Class II, and 44 Class III) from the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia. Dental models were scanned and digitized using ATOS II SO (“Small Objects”) scanning technology (GOM mbH, Braunschweig, Germany). Eight linear and two proportional measurements were calculated for both upper and lower dental arches.Results:In men, a significant difference in the upper dental arch was present in the incisor region, and in the lower dental arch, differences were found in intercanine and intermolar widths (P < .05). Significant differences were noted between male groups in the upper molar depth dimension (P  =  .022) and in the lower molar and canine depth dimensions (P < .05). Class III males had the greatest lower molar and canine width/depth ratios and the smallest lower canine depth/molar depth ratio. Class III women had wider and shorter mandibular arches when compared with Class I and Class II females.Conclusion:The hypothesis was rejected. The dimensions of the dental arches are related to gender and to dentoalveolar class. Class I and II subjects have similar dimensions of maxillary dental arch, but Class II subjects have a transverse deficit in the mandible. In Class III subjects, the maxillary dental arch is insufficient in transverse and sagittal dimensions, and the mandibular arch dominates in the transverse but not in the sagittal dimension.     

A new method of evaluating posterior occlusion and its relation to posttreatment occlusal changes.

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between posterior occlusion and posttreatment changes in other occlusal variables. Pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2), and postretention (T3) records were obtained for 49 Class I (n = 23) and Class II (n = 26) extraction cases. Overbite, overjet, mandibular incisor irregularity, right and left molar deviations, midline deviation, and mandibular arch length were measured, and occlusal registrations were made of each set of dental casts. The proximity of posterior occlusal surfaces was measured as the contact or near-contact areas at or below 300 microm thickness, based on the optical densities of scanned images of the posterior occlusal registrations. The treatment changes for overbite, overjet, right and left molar deviation, and arch length were significantly greater in the Class II group, and the reductions in incisor irregularity were greater in the Class I group. No other class differences were found. Overbite, overjet, and incisor irregularity increased after treatment, and arch length continued to decrease, with no significant class differences. Contact and near-contact areas at or below 300 microm constituted 7% of the functional occlusal table for both classes at the end of treatment, having decreased significantly in both groups (21% in Class I and 29% in Class II) during treatment. Because contact and near-contact areas increased in some patients and decreased in others, there were no significant posttreatment changes. Negative correlations were found between contact and near-contact areas at T2 and changes in overjet from T2 to T3, and between contact and near-contact areas at T3 and changes in overbite from T2 to T3. No relationships were found between posterior contact and near-contact area and incisor irregularity. We concluded that (1) the area of actual and near contacts at or below 300 microm decreased significantly with treatment, indicating that, despite excellent treatment results by conventional standards, the proximity of posterior occlusal surfaces lessened; (2) the proximity of the posterior occlusal surfaces should not be expected to increase posttreatment; (3) posttreatment contact and near-contact areas may be factors in overbite and overjet stability; and (4) posttreatment contact and near-contact areas are not related to incisor irregularity.     

Nonextraction orthodontic therapy: posttreatment dental and skeletal stability

To assess the long-term stability of nonextraction orthodontic treatment, the dental cast and cephalometric records of 28 cases were evaluated. Thirty cephalometric and seven cast parameters were examined before treatment, posttreatment, and an average of almost 8 years postretention. Results showed overall long-term stability to be relatively good. Relapse patterns seen were similar in nature, but intermediate in extent, between untreated normals and four first premolar extraction cases. Significant decreases were seen in arch length and intercanine width during the postretention period despite minimal changes during treatment. Incisor irregularly increased slightly postretention; intermolar width, overjet, and overbite displayed considerable long-term stability. Mandibular incisor mesiodistal and faciolingual dimensions were not associated with either pretreatment or posttreatment incisor crowding. Class II malocclusions with large ANB values and shorter mandibular lengths showed increased incisor irregularity, shorter arch lengths, and deeper overbites at the postretention stage, suggesting that the amount and direction of facial growth may have been partially responsible for maturational changes seen during the postretention period.     

Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with cervical headgear and full fixed orthodontic appliances and without extractions. METHODS: Lateral cephalograms and dental casts of 18 patients were obtained at the beginning and the end of treatment and at the postretention period. Pretreatment records were taken at 11.9 +/- 2.6 years, and the mean treatment time was 2.8 +/- 1.2 years. All patients were asked to use maxillary and mandibular Hawley retainers for 1 year. The average postretention interval was 5.3 years. RESULTS: The assessment of cephalometric findings showed that maxillary growth was restricted; maxillary incisor inclination, overjet, and overbite were decreased; the mandibular incisors were proclined; and a slight mandibular posterior rotation occurred at the end of treatment. At the postretention period, the maxilla remained stable, the mandible moved anteriorly, and the overjet increased slightly (1.25 mm, P < .01). The dental cast changes indicated that both maxillary and mandibular irregularity index values decreased significantly during treatment but increased after 5 years. Mandibular intercanine width decreased 0.47 mm ( P < .01) during the postretention period. CONCLUSIONS: The redirection of maxillary growth remained stable in patients with Class II malocclusions treated with cervical headgear and fixed orthodontic appliances and without extractions, but treatment-induced mandibular rotations tended to return to their original patterns. Various dental changes occurred during the postretention period.     

Maxillary anterior alignment stability in Class I and Class II malocclusions treated with or without extraction

Objective:To compare the postretention stability of maxillary incisors alignment in subjects with Class I and II malocclusion treated with or without extractions.Materials and Methods:The sample comprised 103 subjects with initial maxillary anterior irregularity greater than 3 mm and was divided into four groups: group 1 comprised 19 patients with Class I malocclusion treated with nonextraction (mean initial age = 13.06 years); group 2 comprised 19 patients with Class II malocclusion treated with nonextraction (mean initial age = 12.54 years); group 3 comprised 30 patients with Class I malocclusion treated with extractions (mean initial age = 13.16 years); group 4 comprised 35 patients with Class II malocclusion treated with extractions (mean initial age = 12.99 years). Dental casts were obtained at three different stages: pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2), and long-term posttreatment (T3). Maxillary incisor irregularity and arch dimensions were evaluated. Intergroup comparisons were performed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey tests.Results:In the long-term posttreatment period, relapse of maxillary crowding and arch dimensions was similar in all groups.Conclusion:Changes in maxillary anterior alignment in Class I and Class II malocclusions treated with nonextractions and with extractions were similar in the long-term posttreatment period.     

Dentoskeletal effects produced by a Jasper Jumper with an anterior bite plane

Objective:The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the dentoskeletal effects produced by a modified Jasper Jumper with an anterior bite plane for the correction of Class II division 1 malocclusion.Materials and Methods:A sample of 32 growing patients (mean age  =  11.9 ± 1.4 years) with Class II division 1 malocclusion and increased overbite were treated with a modified Jasper Jumper (JJ) and anterior bite plane protocol and compared with a matched control group of 30 subjects with untreated Class II malocclusion (mean age 12.2 ± 0.8 years). Lateral cephalograms were taken before treatment (T1) and at the end of comprehensive treatment (T2). Mean treatment duration was 2.1 ± 0.4 years. The T1–T2 changes in the two groups were compared with Student’s t-tests for independent samples.Results:The JJ group was successfully treated to a Class I occlusal relationship with a significant reduction in overjet (–3.9 mm, P < .001) and overbite (–3.1 mm, P < .001). The JJ group exhibited a significant increase in mandibular length and a significant improvement in maxillomandibular sagittal skeletal relationships. The lower incisors were significantly proclined, while the lower first molars demonstrated significant movement in a mesial direction.Conclusions:Use of a modified JJ appliance and anterior bite plane is an effective protocol for the treatment of Class II malocclusion with increased overbite and greater skeletal (75%) than dentoalveolar (25%) effects mainly at the mandibular level.     

A retrospective study of Angle Class I malocclusions treated orthodontically without extractions using two palatal expansion methods.

The correction and relapse of mandibular anterior crowding was evaluated in a population of 58 patients with Angle Class I malocclusion who were treated orthodontically without extraction of permanent teeth. The subjects were retrospectively evaluated from records taken before treatment, posttreatment, and postretention. The postretention period averaged 8 years (minimum of 4 and maximum of 20 years). All cases in Groups A and B were given orthopedic treatment to develop the maxillary apical base in the transverse and anteroposterior planes. Group A was treated with expansion of the inner bow of the face bow appliance (Kloehn), and Group B was treated with the Haas palatal expansion appliance. Both groups were then treated orthodontically with tandem mechanics. The response variables measured were: overbite, overjet, intercanine distance, intermolar distance, and irregularity index. Study groups A and B were not significantly different for subject age, retention, or postretention time. Moreover, the groups did not show significant difference for any of the response variables before treatment. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the treatment times (P =.0133). A statistically significant treatment effect was observed for most response variables in the groups. Overbite, overjet, and irregularity index were significantly reduced, intermolar distance was significantly increased, and intercanine distance showed no significant change in Groups A and B. In the postretention period, there was a tendency for variables to change slightly toward their before treatment values but no compromise of orthodontic correction was noted. The irregularity index in Group A was corrected from 4.8 to 1.1 mm and remained at 1.1 mm in the postretention period. The irregularity index in Group B was corrected from 5.1 to 1.2 mm (P =.0001) and changed slightly from 1. 2 to 1.7 mm (P =.0540) in the postretention period. We concluded that mandibular incisors tended to become more crowded postretention. However, in contrast to previous reports, we calculate this relapse to be small. Neither before treatment nor posttreatment variables were predictive of relapse.     

Class II correction in orthodontic patients utilizing the Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (MARA)

Objectives:To evaluate skeletal and dentoalveolar changes produced by the Mandibular Anterior Repostioning Appliance (MARA) in the treatment of Class II malocclusion in adolescent patients.Materials and Methods:Lateral cephalograms of 24 patients, mean age 12.40 years, with a Class II malocclusion consecutively treated with MARA were compared with a historical control group. Changes were evaluated using the Pancherz superimposition and grid analysis pre- and posttreatment. Independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Pearson correlation coefficient analysis were performed.Results:Significant differences were seen between the treatment and control groups during the 12 month period. Improvement in Class II relationship in the MARA group resulted from skeletal and dentoalveolar changes. There was a 7-mm molar correction and a 4.7-mm overjet reduction. There was also an increase in the mandibular base of 3.3 mm with the lower molar and incisor coming forward 2.6 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively. No significant headgear effect was shown on the maxilla. The maxillary incisor position remained unchanged, whereas the molar distalized 1.8 mm. The anterior lower facial height had an overall increase of 2.2 mm.Conclusions:The MARA was successful in achieving a Class I molar relationship and reducing the overjet in Class II malocclusions. This was the result of both skeletal and dentoalveolar changes.     

Short-term postorthodontic changes in the absence of retention

Objective:To evaluate short-term postorthodontic tooth movement without retention.Materials and Methods:Thirty consenting patients participated in the study. At the end of active treatment (T₁), final archwires were removed while leaving the fixed appliances on, and alginate impressions were taken. Four weeks later (T₂) a second set of impressions was taken. A clinical examination performed at T₂ determined if the fixed appliances could be removed or if additional treatment was required. Based on the examination, patients were divided into two groups. Patients in group I (n  =  13) had their fixed appliances removed, while those in group II (n  =  17) required additional treatment. The American Board of Orthodontics'' Objective Grading System scores and the following six variables were measured on plaster casts at T₁ and T₂: maxillary and mandibular crowding or spacing, overbite, overjet, and mandibular intercanine and intermolar widths. Data were analyzed to detect potential changes from T₁ to T₂ and to evaluate differences between the groups.Results:Mandibular crowding, overjet, and interproximal contacts worsened for the entire sample, while marginal ridges, occlusal contacts, and total American Board of Orthodontics scores improved. No statistically significant changes were found within group I from T₁ to T₂. Mandibular crowding, overbite, overjet, alignment/rotations, and interproximal contacts worsened within group II from T₁ to T₂, while marginal ridges and occlusal contacts improved. Significant differences were noted between the groups in terms of alignment/rotations, interproximal contacts, and mandibular intercanine width.Conclusion:Short-term postorthodontic tooth movement without retainers demonstrated improvement in specific characteristics of the occlusion but negatively affected alignment and interproximal contacts in the sample.     

Predictors of patient compliance during Class II division 1 malocclusion functional orthodontic treatment

ObjectivesTo determine factors that could predict Class II/1 malocclusion patient compliance during functional treatment.Materials and MethodsThe sample consisted of 77 subjects (aged 11–13 years; 47% girls) presenting with Class II/1 malocclusion. Inclusion criteria were distal molar relationship, overjet greater than 5 mm, and confirmed pubertal growth spurt. Removable functional appliances (62% Twin Block [TB], 38% Sander Bite Jumping [BJ]) with built-in maxillary expansion screws were used. Follow-up period was 1 year. Patients and parents independently filled out the Child Perception Questionnaire, Parental/Caregiver Perception Questionnaire, and Family Impact Scale to assess emotional and social well-being, oral symptoms, functional limitations, parental emotions, family activities, conflicts, and financial burden as possible predictors of compliance during treatment. Sex, overjet, and appliance type were also analyzed.ResultsThere were more noncompliant than compliant patients (55% vs 45%). Parental perception of altered emotional well-being of their children was the strongest predictor, increasing compliance odds 3.4 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–9.4; P = .017). Patients were 3.2 times (95% CI, 1.1–9.3; P = .033) more likely to cooperate with TB compared with BJ appliance. OJ ≥ 8 mm increased compliance odds 3.1 times (95% CI, 1.0–9.4; P = .044).ConclusionsParental perception of child''s emotional well-being alteration, severity of malocclusion, and type of appliance are major predictors of compliance. Psychosocial issues and oral function limitations reported by children and family impact are of negligible influence.     

A cephalometric, tomographic, and dental cast evaluation of Fr?nkel therapy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the skeletal, dental, and condylar positional changes induced by Fr?nkel FR-2 therapy. The pre- and posttreatment cephalometric, tomographic, and dental cast records of 25 consecutively treated cases were evaluated. Results showed little Class II skeletal correction with no headgear-type restraining effect on the maxilla or mandibular growth stimulation noted. Significant amounts of maxillary incisor retraction and mandibular incisor proclination were observed. The maxillary intermolar width along with the mandibular intercanine and intermolar widths were significantly increased during treatment. No significant changes in condylar position were found during Fr?nkel therapy and only a small increase in mandibular plane angle was noted.     

Dimensional changes of dental arches produced by fixed and removable palatal cribs: A prospective,randomized, controlled study

Objective:To evaluate the dimensional changes of dental arches on digital models of open bite treatment with fixed and removable palatal cribs.Materials and Methods:The sample comprised 41 patients of both sexes who were white, aged 7–10 years, and who had mixed dentition, Angle Class I molar relationship, and a negative overbite of at least 1 mm. The sample was randomly divided into two groups: G1, fixed palatal crib; and G2, removable palatal crib. Cast models, obtained initially (T1) and after 1 year of treatment (T2), were scanned by a three-dimensional (3D) scanner, 3Shape R700, producing a 3D image. Measurements were performed by a calibrated examiner using OrthoAnalyzer™ 3D software.Results:At T2–T1, differences were observed between the groups regarding vertical dentoalveolar development and overjet. There was more mandibular incisor extrusion for G1 (−1.66 mm) than for G2 (−0.54 mm). An overjet increase was observed in G1 (0.56 mm), in contrast to a reduction in G2 (−0.40 mm). There was a similar overbite increase for both groups (3.51 mm for fixed palatal crib and 3.88 mm for removable palatal crib).Conclusions:Both the treatment protocols are similarly effective for anterior open bite correction, providing an overbite increase with dentoalveolar arch changes, especially in the anterior region.