Levetiracetam in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: long-term efficacy in newly diagnosed adolescents

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). The study group consisted of 32 patients with epilepsy (20 males, 12 females) with a mean age of 13 years 3 months (SD 7y 11mo) at seizure onset. LEV was administered as the first drug; all patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months. The dose that achieved seizure control ranged from 1000 to 2500mg/daily. At 6-month evaluation: 15 patients were seizure free; 14 patients were responders (>50% reduction in seizures); and three patients had marginal effects (<50% reduction of seizures). At 12-month evaluation: 29 patients were seizure free; three patients were responders. No patients reported adverse events. These data provide preliminary evidence that LEV may be effective for treating patients with newly diagnosed JME.     

Topiramate in patients with learning disability and refractory epilepsy

PURPOSE: Management of seizures in learning disabled people is challenging. This prospective study explored the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive topiramate (TPM) in patients with learning disability and refractory epilepsy attending a single centre. METHODS: Sixty-four patients (36 men, 28 women, aged 16-65 years) were begun on adjunctive TPM after a 3-month prospective baseline on unchanged medication. Efficacy end points were reached when a consistent response was achieved over a 6-month period at optimal TPM dosing. These were seizure freedom or > or =50% seizure reduction (responder). Appetite, behaviour, alertness, and sleep were assessed by caregivers throughout the study. RESULTS: Sixteen (25%) patients became seizure free with adjunctive TPM. There were 29 (45%) responders. A further 10 (16%) patients experiencing a more modest improvement in seizure control continued on treatment at the behest of their family and/or caregivers. TPM was discontinued in the remaining nine (14%) patients, mainly because of side effects. Final TPM doses and plasma concentrations varied widely among the efficacy outcome groups. Many patients responding well to adjunctive TPM did so on < or =200 mg daily. Mean carer scores did not worsen with TPM therapy. CONCLUSIONS: TPM was effective as add-on therapy in learning-disabled people with difficult-to-control epilepsy. Seizure freedom is a realistic goal in this population.     

Levetiracetam in refractory epilepsy: a prospective observational study.

This prospective open-label study used flexible dosing schedules of levetiracetam (LEV) in patients with refractory epilepsy attending a single centre to explore its effectiveness in everyday clinical practice. One hundred and fifty-six patients with uncontrolled localisation-related or idiopathic-generalised epilepsy were prescribed adjunctive LEV following a 3-month baseline. The primary end points were seizure freedom for at least 6 months, > or = 50% reduction (responder) or <50% reduction for 6 months, or discontinuation of LEV due to lack of efficacy, adverse effects or both. Overall, 40 (26%) patients became seizure free on adjunctive LEV, including 8 (40%) with idiopathic-generalised epilepsy. Twenty-five (63%) of the seizure-free patients took 1000 mg LEV per day or less. A further 33 (21%) patients were classified as responders. LEV was withdrawn in 46 (29%) patients (27 adverse effects, 8 lack of efficacy, 11 both). Intolerable sedation, reported by 20 (13%) patients, was the commonest complaint leading to treatment failure. Behavioural side effects led to LEV withdrawal in 7 (5%) patients. LEV is an effective adjunctive treatment for refractory idiopathic and localisation-related epilepsies. Many patients who responded optimally to LEV did so at 1000 mg per day or less.     

Role of topiramate in adults with intractable epilepsy, mental retardation, and developmental disabilities.

The efficacy and safety of topiramate in patients with intractable mixed seizures, mental retardation (MR), and developmental disabilities (DD) were investigated. Twenty patients (eight females and 12 males) aged 21-57 years old with intractable epilepsy with mixed seizures, MR [profound (five), severe (three), moderate (two), mild (eight) and borderline (two)], and DD were treated with adjunctive topiramate 25 mg per day for 1 week followed by titration to clinical response (range 50-350 mg per day). Other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were decreased simultaneously. Topiramate therapy was discontinued in four patients for adverse events consisting of disorientation, unsteadiness, and pneumonia (one patient); anaphylactic shock from a tuna fish allergy (one); patient choice (one); and loss to follow-up (one). Seizures improved by gt-or-equal, slanted 50% in 11 of 16 patients (69%). Two patients (13%) were seizure free, including one patient who prior to topiramate therapy was seizure free but experiencing an intolerable adverse effect during therapy with another AED. Seizure duration and/or severity decreased in seven patients (44%). An increase in alertness was observed in 11 patients (59%). Topiramate was associated with improvement in seizure severity and alertness in this series and may be useful as adjunctive therapy in patients with mixed seizures, MR, and DD.     

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam during 1-year follow-up in patients with refractory epilepsy.

PROBLEM: Levetiracetam (LEV) is a new antiepileptic drug shown to be effective for the treatment of partial seizures in pivotal clinical trials. We investigated the long-term efficacy and tolerability of LEV as add-on therapy, regardless of seizure type, especially in persons who would not be eligible for clinical trials due to factors such as mental retardation and concomitant psychiatric disorders. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients participated and were followed for 1 year. Demographic data, seizure frequency, and side effects were recorded at baseline and during the 1-year follow-up. The first 35 patients were given LEV at a starting dose of 500 mg b.i.d. with weekly increments of 1000 mg (fast titration). The other patients were given LEV with a starting dose of 250 mg b.i.d. with weekly increments of 250 mg (slow titration). RESULTS: Fourteen patients were completely seizure free after titration to effective dose and 57 were responders with >50% seizure reduction for the first year. In the group with generalized seizures, 1 out of 19 became seizure free, but 8 patients had >50% decrease. Average dose at 1 year was 1900 mg (+/-900). Seventeen of 38 discontinuations were due to adverse effects and 21 were due to lack of efficacy. With fast titration, 15 out of 35 (43%) experienced tiredness during the first 12 weeks, and with slower titration 20 of 63 (32%) experienced tiredness. The difference was not statistically significant.Four out of the five patients who discontinued due to behavioral adverse events (mainly irritability) previously had behavioral problems and/or mental retardation. One patient discontinued due to psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: Levetiracetam appears to be well tolerated in patients with severe epilepsy and shows efficacy in a long-term follow-up. Behavioral adverse events were noted in a small number of patients and occurred mainly in patients who had a history of behavioral disturbance or were mentally retarded. These data from an open population are consistent with the findings of clinical trials.     

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with partial seizures: an open-label trial

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) as adjunctive therapy in children with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. METHODS: Children (aged 6-12 years) with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures receiving one standard antiepileptic drug (AED) were eligible. After a 4-week baseline period, children received LEV in a 6-week titration phase (target dose, 40 mg/kg/day) followed by an 8-week evaluation phase. Seizure frequency during the evaluation period with individualized LEV doses (20-40 mg/kg/day) were compared with the 4-week baseline seizure frequency. Plasma concentrations of LEV and other AEDs were determined to evaluate potential drug interactions. RESULTS: Twenty-four subjects enrolled and received LEV; 23 entered the evaluation phase, and 22 completed the evaluation phase. Compared with their baseline seizure frequency, 12 (52%) of 23 subjects entering the evaluation phase had their seizure frequency decrease by >50%. Two subjects remained seizure free during the entire evaluation period. LEV did not significantly affect plasma concentrations of any concomitant AED during this study, and no alteration of mean clinical laboratory values was observed. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache, infection, anorexia, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: This open-label study of adjunctive LEV therapy (at 20-40 mg/kg/day) suggests that LEV is effective, safe, and well tolerated in children ages 6-12 years with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of LEV adjunctive therapy in children with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures is needed and ongoing to confirm these open-label findings.     

Levetiracetam during 1-year follow-up in children, adolescents, and young adults with refractory epilepsy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) in refractory crypto/symptomatic, partial or generalised epilepsy in children, adolescents and young adults. METHODS: We performed a prospective open label add-on study in 99 patients (age 12 months to 32 years, mean 14 years) with partial or generalised, crypto/symptomatic seizures. Levetiracetam was added to no more than two baseline AEDs and the efficacy was rated according to seizure type and frequency. RESULTS: LEV was initiated at the starting dose of 10mg/kg/day with 5-day increments up to 50 mg/kg/day, unless it was not tolerated. Concomitant therapy was generally not modified throughout the study. After a mean follow-up period of 6.7 months (range 3 weeks to 29 months), 11 patients (11.1%) were free of seizures (cryptogenic partial epilepsy, 5; symptomatic partial epilepsy, 6). A more than 75% seizure decrease was found in 14 patients (14.1%) and >50% in 8 (8.1%). Seizures were unchanged in 38 (38.4%), and worsened in 23 (23.2%). Mild and transient adverse side effects were found in 17 patients (17.2%), mostly represented by irritability and drowsiness. CONCLUSION: LEV appears to be well tolerated in children and adolescents with severe epilepsy and seems to be a broad spectrum AED, though in our experience, it was more effective against partial seizures with or without secondarily generalisation. LEV efficacy in other epilepsy syndrome should be evaluated further in homogeneous, more selected patients.     

Adjunctive levetiracetam in children, adolescents, and adults with primary generalized seizures: open-label, noncomparative, multicenter, long-term follow-up study

Purpose: To evaluate the long‐term efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive levetiracetam (LEV) in patients with uncontrolled idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). Methods: This phase III, open‐label, long‐term, follow‐up study (N167; NCT00150748) enrolled patients (4 to <65 years) with primary generalized seizures (tonic–clonic, myoclonic, absence). Patients received adjunctive LEV at individualized doses (1,000–4,000 mg/day; 20–80 mg/kg/day for children/adolescents weighing <50 kg). Efficacy results are reported for all seizure types [intention‐to‐treat (ITT) population, N = 217] and subpopulations with tonic–clonic (n = 152), myoclonic (n = 121), and/or absence (n = 70) seizures at baseline. Key Findings: One hundred twenty‐five (57.6%) of 217 patients were still receiving treatment at the end of the study. Mean (standard deviation, SD) LEV dose was 2,917.5 (562.9) mg/day. Median (Q1–Q3) exposure to LEV was 2.1 (1.5–2.8) years, and the maximum duration was 4.6 years. Most patients were taking one (124/217, 57.1%) or ≥2 (92/217, 42.4%) concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Seizure freedom of ≥6 months (all seizure types; primary efficacy end point) was achieved by 122 (56.2%) of 217 patients, and 49 (22.6%) of 217 patients had complete seizure freedom. Seizure freedom of ≥6 months from tonic–clonic, myoclonic, and absence seizures was achieved by 95 (62.5%) of 152, 75 (62.0%) of 121, and 44 (62.9%) of 70 patients, respectively. Mean (SD) maximum seizure freedom duration was 371.7 (352.4) days. At least one treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE) was reported by 165 (76%) of 217 patients; most TEAEs were mild/moderate in severity, with no indication of an increased incidence over time. Seventeen (7.8%) of 217 patients discontinued medication because of TEAEs. The most common psychiatric TEAEs were depression (16/217, 7.4%), insomnia (9/217, 4.1%), nervousness (8/217, 3.7%), and anxiety (7/217, 3.2%). Significance: Adjunctive LEV (range 1,000–4,000 mg/day) demonstrated efficacy as a long‐term treatment for primary generalized seizures in children, adolescents, and adults with IGE, and was well tolerated.     

Levetiracetam in patients with refractory epilepsy: results of the SKATE trial in Austria, Germany and Switzerland.

PURPOSE: To further evaluate the safety, efficacy and optimal dose of levetiracetam (LEV) in daily clinical practice among patients with uncontrolled partial epilepsy with or without secondary generalization. METHODS: In this phase IV, open-label, 16-week community-based study, 178 at least 16-year-old patients with refractory focal epilepsy were treated with 1000, 2000 or 3000 mg levetiracetam as adjunctive therapy. All patients started with 500 mg LEV b.i.d. (1000 mg/day); the dose was adjusted in 2-week intervals up to 1500 b.i.d. (3000 mg/day) depending on seizure control and tolerability. The main objectives were the adverse events, the percentage reduction in partial and total seizure frequency per week from baseline and the retention rate, defined as the percentage of patients taking LEV at the end of the 16-week treatment period. RESULTS: Of the 178 patients who took at least one dose of LEV 151 completed the study. Thus, the retention rate (number of patients taking LEV at the end of the 16-week treatment period) was 84.8%. Most frequently reported adverse events were asthenia, dizziness, headache, nausea, somnolence and hostility; the majority of these events were of mild to moderate intensity. The seizure-free rate of the ITT population with focal seizures was 16.7%, for all seizures 16.6%; the median reduction of focal seizure frequency was 47.6%, and 46.5% for all seizures. The 50% responder rate was 46.6% for focal seizures and 45.1% for all seizures. CONCLUSION: Add-on treatment with LEV in patients with refractory partial epilepsy was safe and effective in this study.     

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam as adjunctive treatment of refractory partial seizures in a multicentre open-label single-arm trial in Korean patients.

This prospective, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive levetiracetam (LEV) in Korean adults with uncontrolled partial epilepsy. Study patients had to have an average of at least 1 and not more than 14 partial seizures per month (averaged over a 3-month historical baseline) despite the use of one or two AEDs. Patients initially received LEV 1000 mg/day (administered bid) and could increase to 2000 mg/day after 2 weeks, and to 3000 mg/day after another 2 weeks, to obtain adequate seizure control. During the 12-week maintenance period, the dose of LEV could be increased or decreased once if seizure control was insufficient or tolerability warranted, respectively. Seizure count and adverse events (AEs) were recorded by patients. Global evaluation scale (GES) and quality of life (QOLIE-31) were also evaluated. A total of 100 patients were enrolled and 92 patients completed the study. The median percent reduction in weekly seizure frequency over the treatment period was 43.2%. The >or=50% and >or=75% responder rates were 45.4% and 36.1%, respectively. Seizure freedom throughout the 16-week treatment period was observed in 17 patients. On investigator's GES, 81 patients were considered improved, with 41 patients showing marked improvement. Most QOLIE-31 scales improved significantly. Treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 59 patients. Three most common AEs were somnolence (36%), dizziness (12%), and headache (8%). Adjunctive LEV therapy was effective and well-tolerated in Korean adults with refractory partial epilepsy.     

Monotherapy for partial epilepsy: focus on levetiracetam

Levetiracetam (LEV), the S-enantiomer of alpha-ethyl-2-oxo-1-pyrollidine acetamide, is a recently licensed antiepileptic drug (AED) for adjunctive therapy of partial seizures. Its mechanism of action is uncertain but it exhibits a unique profile of anticonvulsant activity in models of chronic epilepsy. Five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials enrolling adult or pediatric patients with refractory partial epilepsy have demonstrated the efficacy of LEV as adjunctive therapy, with a responder rate (>/=50% reduction in seizure frequency) of 28%-45%. Long-term efficacy studies suggest retention rates of 60% after one year, with 13% of patients seizure-free for 6 months of the study and 8% seizure-free for 1 year. More recent studies illustrated successful conversion to monotherapy in patients with refractory epilepsy, and its effectiveness as a single agent in partial epilepsy. LEV has also efficacy in generalized epilepsies. Adverse effects of LEV, including somnolence, lethargy, and dizziness, are generally mild and their occurrence rate seems to be not significantly different from that observed in placebo groups. LEV also has no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with other AEDs, or with commonly prescribed medications. The combination of effective antiepileptic properties with a relatively mild adverse effect profile makes LEV an attractive therapy for partial seizures.     

Levetiracetam monotherapy for late poststroke seizures in the elderly

Stroke is the most common cause of seizures in the elderly. Antiepileptic drugs are used to treat most patients with late poststroke seizures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) in patients aged 60 or older with late-onset poststroke seizures. This prospective study evaluated patients 60 years of age or older, who had at least two late-onset poststroke seizures and were given LEV monotherapy. Demographic data and seizure and stroke characteristics were recorded. Outpatient visits were made after 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 months and every 3 months thereafter, and the effectiveness and tolerability of LEV were investigated. Thirty-four patients with a mean age of 69.76+/-6.41 were included in this study. Average seizure frequency before treatment was 3.61+/-3.02/month. Mean follow-up time was 17.68+/-3.24 months. At daily doses of 1000-2000 mg, 82.4% of the patients were seizure free, and 7 patients (20.6%) had side effects. LEV was discontinued in one patient because of severe somnolence. Two patients were switched to another antiepileptic drug because of uncontrolled seizures despite an increase in dose up to 3000 mg/day. LEV monotherapy can be effective and well tolerated in elderly patients with late-onset poststroke seizures.     

Levetiracetam monotherapy for elderly patients with epilepsy.

We retrospectively identified 14 elderly patients with a history of partial seizures who received levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy. Patients began LEV either as first line therapy (n=5) or were converted to LEV monotherapy (n=9) after failing prior antiepileptic medications (AEDs). Thirteen patients continued on LEV monotherapy for at least 6 months. One patient was lost to follow-up. Eight patients (61.5%) became seizure free. Four patients who began LEV as a first line therapy became seizure free, whereas the remaining four patients who converted to LEV after they failed their previous AEDs became seizure free. Four patients (30.7%) had more than a 50% seizure reduction of seizures. Only one patient had no significant change in seizure frequency after started on LEV. The total dosages used to control seizures were 500-3000 mg/day, (mean 1839.2 mg/day). LEV monotherapy can be effective and well tolerated in this group of patients. A prospective, larger, double blind monotherapy study is needed to confirm this finding.     

Melatonin in wake-sleep disorders in children, adolescents and young adults with mental retardation with or without epilepsy: a double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled trial

The aim of the present study was to verify the clinical efficacy of melatonin (MLT) in children, adolescents and young adults with wake-sleep disorder and mental retardation, most of them on chronic anticonvulsant therapy for epileptic seizures, by means of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial. Twenty-five patients (16 males, nine females), aged from 3.6 to 26 years (mean 10.5 years), all affected with mental retardation mostly with epileptic seizures, were randomized to oral synthetic fast-release MLT or placebo. Melatonin was initiated at the daily dose of 3 mg, at nocturnal bedtime. In case of inefficacy, MLT dose could be titrated up to 9 mg the following 2 weeks at increments of 3 mg/week, unless the patient was unable to tolerate it. The analysis of all the sleep logs disclosed a significant treatment effect of melatonin on sleep latency (P = 0.019). Melatonin was well tolerated in all patients and no side effects were reported. In conclusion, our study supports the efficacy of MLT in young patients with mental disabilities and epileptic seizures in improving the wake-sleep disorders such as time to fall asleep. Overall, MLT appeared to influence the seizure frequency poorly, though there may be occasional seizure worsening or improving. Such a dual effect requires further studies in young epileptic patients.     

The SKATE study: an open-label community-based study of levetiracetam as add-on therapy for adults with uncontrolled partial epilepsy

The Safety of Keppra as Adjunctive Therapy in Epilepsy (SKATE) study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of levetiracetam (Keppra, LEV) as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures in clinical practice. This Phase IV, 16-week, open-label study recruited patients > or =16-year old with treatment-resistant partial seizures. LEV (1000 mg/day) was added to a stable concomitant antiepileptic drug regimen. LEV dosage was adjusted based on seizure control and tolerability to a maximum of 3000 mg/day. 1541 patients (intent-to-treat population) were recruited including 1346 (87.3%) who completed the study and 77.0% who declared further continuing on LEV after the trial. Overall, 50.5% of patients reported at least one adverse event that was considered related to LEV treatment. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were mild-to-moderate somnolence, fatigue, dizziness and headache. Serious adverse events considered related to LEV occurred in 1.0% of patients. 7.5% of patients reported adverse events as the most important reason for study drug discontinuation. The median reduction from baseline in the frequency of all seizures was 50.2%; 15.8% of patients were seizure free; 50.1% had seizure frequency reduction of > or =50%. At the end of the study, 60.4% of patients were considered by the investigator to show marked or moderate improvement. There was a significant improvement in health-related quality of life as assessed with the QOLIE-10-P (total score increasing from 55.6 to 61.6; p<0.001). This community-based study suggests that LEV is well tolerated and effective as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures in adults. These data provide supportive evidence for the safety and efficacy of LEV demonstrated in the pivotal Phase III placebo-controlled studies.     

An open-label study of levetiracetam at individualised doses between 1000 and 3000 mg day(-1) in adult patients with refractory epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: The novel antiepileptic drug (AED) levetiracetam (LEV, Keppra) is indicated as adjunctive therapy for partial epilepsy. The primary aim of this study was to measure the safety and tolerability of LEV individualised dosing in a heterogeneous refractory epilepsy population.METHODS: LEV was evaluated in a 10- to 16-week open-label, multicentre study in adult patients with epilepsy refractory to previous treatment with at least two AEDs. Individualised LEV doses up to 3000 mg x day(-1) were determined in an initial up-titration phase, and optimal doses were administered as adjunctive treatment during an 8- to 10-week evaluation period. Concomitant AEDs and their doses could not be changed during the study. Safety and tolerability were monitored by expression of adverse events as well as by retention rate. The effect of LEV on concomitant AED concentration was also studied. Efficacy was assessed using global clinical evaluation (GCE) scores, seizure frequency, and >or=50% responder rate. RESULTS: LEV therapy was initiated in 219 patients; 183 had localisation-related epilepsy and 37 had generalised epilepsy. In one patient, epileptic syndrome was defined as both localisation-related and generalised. About 81.7% (179/219) continued and completed treatment throughout the study, and 79% (172/219) chose to continue LEV in a follow-up study. The most common adverse events were asthenia, dizziness, and somnolence. Most adverse events occurred during up-titration. LEV treatment did not alter the concentration of concomitant AEDs. LEV improved GCE scores in 79.5% (152/191) of patients. LEV reduced the median total seizure frequency of all patients from a median of 2.25 seizures per week at baseline (n=219) to 1.10 seizures per week during the evaluation period (n=191 patients with at least one seizure count during evaluation). The >or=50% responder rate was 48.2% for all seizure types, 49.4% for partial-onset, and 51.4% for generalised-onset seizures. Throughout the evaluation period (i.e. from the start of the evaluation period until completion or early discontinuation), 26/191 (13.6%) had a 100% reduction in total seizure frequency, while in a follow-up study, 10.5% (18/172) were seizure-free for at least 6 months and 6.4% (11/172) were seizure-free for at least 1 year. CONCLUSION: LEV was well tolerated, as evidenced by limited adverse event reporting and the high retention rate, and appeared effective in both generalised and partial epilepsy.     

Multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of levetiracetam as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. European Levetiracetam Study Group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV, Keppra) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: In this European multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, LEV (500 or 1,000 mg twice daily) was compared with placebo as add-on therapy in 324 patients with uncontrolled simple or complex partial seizures, or both, with or without secondary generalization. After enrollment, three parallel groups were assessed during a baseline period of 8 or 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week titration interval and a 12-week evaluation period. RESULTS: LEV significantly decreased partial seizure frequency compared with placebo. A reduction in seizure frequency of > or =50% occurred in 22.8% of patients in the 1,000-mg group and 31.6% of patients in the 2,000-mg group, compared with 10.4% of patients in the placebo group. Administration of LEV did not affect plasma concentrations of concomitant antiepileptic drugs or alter vital signs or laboratory parameters. No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed between treatment groups (70.8% for the 1,000-mg group and 75.5% for the 2,000-mg group), or between the LEV and placebo groups (73.2% for placebo group). The most commonly reported adverse effects in the LEV group were asthenia, headache, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: The antiepileptic efficacy and tolerability of LEV (1,000 mg/d and 2,000 mg/d, administered in two divided doses) as add-on therapy was established in patients with refractory partial seizures in this clinical study.     

Use of levetiracetam in hospitalized patients

PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to analyze the short-term efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) to treat repetitive seizures in hospitalized patients. METHODS: During admission to a tertiary hospital, we retrospectively identified patients with repetitive seizures who were treated for the first time with LEV during a hospital stay. LEV was considered effective if seizure cessation or >75% seizure reduction occurred in the 24 h after starting LEV (compared with the previous 48 h), requiring no further antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment. RESULTS: Thirty patients (12 men, 18 women) were included. Mean age was 59.7 years. Most frequent seizure type was focal motor in 12 (40%) of 30 patients. Most frequent etiology was stroke: nine (30%) of 30 patients. Relevant medical conditions included atrial fibrillation (three) and hepatic disease (three). Concomitant medications included oral anticoagulants (seven), corticosteroids (two), and chemotherapy (two). Four patients received LEV as the only AED. Six patients with focal SE and 20 (66.6%) patients with clusters of seizures but not in SE received LEV as add-on treatment after lack of response to first-line AEDs. Mean LEV dose during first day was 1,119 mg. Mean daily maintenance dose was 1,724 mg. LEV was effective in 24 (80%) patients, all four patients who received it as the only AED, four of six patients with focal SE, and 16 of 20 patients with clusters of seizures. Three (10%) elderly patients with seizures secondary to stroke and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) reported moderate/severe somnolence and dizziness, leading to treatment discontinuation in one. On discharge, 20 (66.7%) patients continued on LEV, nine (30%) as the only AED. CONCLUSIONS: LEV is effective and safe to treat repetitive seizures in hospitalized patients, including patients in focal SE.     

Topiramate as add-on drug in children,adolescents and young adults with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: an Italian multicentric study

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate (TPM) as adjunctive therapy in children, adolescents and young adults with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). We performed a prospective open label add-on study in 45 patients (age 4-34 years, mean 15.9 years) with LGS and refractory seizures. TPM was added to one or two other baseline drugs and the efficacy was rated according to seizure type and frequency. TPM was initiated at the daily dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg, followed by a 2-week titration at increments of 1-3 mg/kg/24 h, up to a maximum daily dose of 12 mg/kg. After a mean period of 15.8 months of treatment (range 3-98 months), at a mean dose of 4.1 mg/kg/24 h (range 1.4-12 mg/kg), 18 patients (40%) had a seizure reduction more than 50%. TPM appeared to be effective mainly in major seizures (drop attacks, tonic and tonic-clonic seizures). Mild to moderate adverse events were present in 24 patients (53.3%), mostly represented by drowsiness, nervousness, hyporexia with or without weight loss and cognitive dulling. In conclusion, TPM adjunctive therapy reduced the number of drop attacks and major motor seizures in 40% of patients with LGS and produced only mild or moderate adverse events.     

Effects of levetiracetam on seizure frequency and neuropsychological impairments in children with refractory epilepsy with secondary bilateral synchrony

PurposeIn epilepsy with continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep (CSWS), which is a representative epileptic syndrome of secondary bilateral synchrony (SBS), the urgent suppression of this electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormality may be necessary to prevent the progression of neuropsychological impairments. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) on SBS, seizure frequency, and neuropsychological impairments in children with refractory epilepsy.MethodsEleven (seven male and four female) patients with refractory epilepsy with SBS on EEG, aged between 4.7 years and 11.3 years, were included in this study. After a 3-month baseline period, the patients were given LEV at an initial dose of 10 mg/kg/day for the first week, followed at increments of 5 mg/kg/day every week, up to 20 mg/kg/day. The LEV dose was then adjusted up to a maximum of 60 mg/kg/day, according to the clinician's judgment. EEG recordings and clinical evaluations were performed every 3 months, focusing on SBS. The occurrence of SBS was then scored, and the relationship between the score and the response to LEV treatment was evaluated. In comparison with the baseline SBS frequency, the EEG response to LEV treatment was classified, and responders were identified as having a ≥50% reduction in SBS frequency. In addition, in comparison with the baseline seizure frequency, response to LEV treatment was classified. Responders were identified as patients with complete cessation (100% seizure control) and a response of ≥50% reduction in seizures. Furthermore, neuropsychological impairments such as hyperactivity, impulsiveness, and inattention were evaluated before and after LEV treatment.ResultsEight patients (72.7%) were considered responders. In addition, all eight patients were also considered responders for clinical seizures. Furthermore, 7 of 8 (87.5%) patients with response showed decreased hyperactivity and impulsivity after LEV administration.ConclusionsThe present data clearly indicate the usefulness of LEV in reducing both SBS on EEG and seizure frequency. LEV represents an important addition to the treatments available for refractory childhood epilepsies with SBS on EEG.