Loss of Miro1-directed mitochondrial movement results in a novel murine model for neuron disease

Defective mitochondrial distribution in neurons is proposed to cause ATP depletion and calcium-buffering deficiencies that compromise cell function. However, it is unclear whether aberrant mitochondrial motility and distribution alone are sufficient to cause neurological disease. Calcium-binding mitochondrial Rho (Miro) GTPases attach mitochondria to motor proteins for anterograde and retrograde transport in neurons. Using two new KO mouse models, we demonstrate that Miro1 is essential for development of cranial motor nuclei required for respiratory control and maintenance of upper motor neurons required for ambulation. Neuron-specific loss of Miro1 causes depletion of mitochondria from corticospinal tract axons and progressive neurological deficits mirroring human upper motor neuron disease. Although Miro1-deficient neurons exhibit defects in retrograde axonal mitochondrial transport, mitochondrial respiratory function continues. Moreover, Miro1 is not essential for calcium-mediated inhibition of mitochondrial movement or mitochondrial calcium buffering. Our findings indicate that defects in mitochondrial motility and distribution are sufficient to cause neurological disease.Motor neuron diseases (MNDs), including ALS and spastic paraplegia (SP), are characterized by the progressive, length-dependent degeneration of motor neurons, leading to muscle atrophy, paralysis, and, in some cases, premature death. There are both inherited and sporadic forms of MNDs, which can affect upper motor neurons, lower motor neurons, or both. Although the molecular and cellular causes of most MNDs are unknown, many are associated with defects in axonal transport of cellular components required for neuron function and maintenance (1–6).A subset of MNDs is associated with impaired mitochondrial respiration and mitochondrial distribution. This observation has led to the hypothesis that neurodegeneration results from defects in mitochondrial motility and distribution, which, in turn, cause subcellular ATP depletion and interfere with mitochondrial calcium ([Ca²⁺]_m) buffering at sites of high synaptic activity (reviewed in ref. 7). It is not known, however, whether mitochondrial motility defects are a primary cause or a secondary consequence of MND progression. In addition, it has been difficult to isolate the primary effect of mitochondrial motility defects in MNDs because most mutations that impair mitochondrial motility in neurons also affect transport of other organelles and vesicles (1, 8–11).In mammals, the movement of neuronal mitochondria between the cell body and the synapse is controlled by adaptors called trafficking kinesin proteins (Trak1 and Trak2) and molecular motors (kinesin heavy chain and dynein), which transport the organelle in the anterograde or retrograde direction along axonal microtubule tracks (7, 12–24). Mitochondrial Rho (Miro) GTPase proteins are critical for transport because they are the only known surface receptors that attach mitochondria to these adaptors and motors (12–15, 18, 25, 26). Miro proteins are tail-anchored in the outer mitochondrial membrane with two GTPase domains and two predicted calcium-binding embryonic fibroblast (EF) hand motifs facing the cytoplasm (12, 13, 25, 27, 28). A recent Miro structure revealed two additional EF hands that were not predicted from the primary sequence (29). Studies in cultured cells suggest that Miro proteins also function as calcium sensors (via their EF hands) to regulate kinesin-mediated mitochondrial “stopping” in axons (15, 16, 26). Miro-mediated movement appears to be inhibited when cytoplasmic calcium is elevated in active synapses, effectively recruiting mitochondria to regions where calcium buffering and energy are needed. Despite this progress, the physiological relevance of these findings has not yet been tested in a mammalian animal model. In addition, mammals ubiquitously express two Miro orthologs, Miro1 and Miro2, which are 60% identical (12, 13). However, the individual roles of Miro1 and Miro2 in neuronal development, maintenance, and survival have no been evaluated.We describe two new mouse models that establish the importance of Miro1-mediated mitochondrial motility and distribution in mammalian neuronal function and maintenance. We show that Miro1 is essential for development/maintenance of specific cranial neurons, function of postmitotic motor neurons, and retrograde mitochondrial motility in axons. Loss of Miro1-directed retrograde mitochondrial transport is sufficient to cause MND phenotypes in mice without abrogating mitochondrial respiratory function. Furthermore, Miro1 is not essential for calcium-mediated inhibition of mitochondrial movement or [Ca²⁺]_m buffering. These findings have an impact on current models for Miro1 function and introduce a specific and rapidly progressing mouse model for MND.     

Optineurin is an autophagy receptor for damaged mitochondria in parkin-mediated mitophagy that is disrupted by an ALS-linked mutation

Mitophagy is a cellular quality control pathway in which the E3 ubiquitin ligase parkin targets damaged mitochondria for degradation by autophagosomes. We examined the role of optineurin in mitophagy, as mutations in optineurin are causative for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and glaucoma, diseases in which mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated. Using live cell imaging, we demonstrate the parkin-dependent recruitment of optineurin to mitochondria damaged by depolarization or reactive oxygen species. Parkin’s E3 ubiquitin ligase activity is required to ubiquitinate outer mitochondrial membrane proteins, allowing optineurin to stably associate with ubiquitinated mitochondria via its ubiquitin binding domain; in the absence of parkin, optineurin transiently localizes to damaged mitochondrial tips. Following optineurin recruitment, the omegasome protein double FYVE-containing protein 1 (DFCP1) transiently localizes to damaged mitochondria to initialize autophagosome formation and the recruitment of microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3). Optineurin then induces autophagosome formation around damaged mitochondria via its LC3 interaction region (LIR) domain. Depletion of endogenous optineurin inhibits LC3 recruitment to mitochondria and inhibits mitochondrial degradation. These defects are rescued by expression of siRNA-resistant wild-type optineurin, but not by an ALS-associated mutant in the ubiquitin binding domain (E478G), or by optineurin with a mutation in the LIR domain. Optineurin and p62/SQSTM1 are independently recruited to separate domains on damaged mitochondria, and p62 is not required for the recruitment of either optineurin or LC3 to damaged mitochondria. Thus, our study establishes an important role for optineurin as an autophagy receptor in parkin-mediated mitophagy and demonstrates that defects in a single pathway can lead to neurodegenerative diseases with distinct pathologies.Damaged mitochondria are selectively turned over in eukaryotic cells via mitophagy, a process in which double-membraned autophagosomes sequester and ultimately degrade mitochondria via lysosomal fusion (1, 2). This process is regulated by phosphatase and tensin homolog-induced putative kinase protein 1 (PINK1) and parkin, two proteins linked to hereditary forms of Parkinson’s disease (3, 4). PINK1 is stabilized on the outer membrane of damaged mitochondria and recruits the E3 ubiquitin ligase parkin, which ubiquitinates proteins on the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) (5–13). Parkin-mediated ubiquitination of damaged mitochondria is followed by autophagosome formation and engulfment of mitochondria (1, 2). However, the proteins involved in dynamically recruiting autophagic machinery to ubiquitinated damaged mitochondria still remain elusive.Optineurin is an autophagy receptor, characterized by its ability to bind ubiquitin via its ubiquitin binding in ABIN (A20 binding and inhibitor of NF-κB) and NEMO (NF-κB essential modulator) (UBAN) domain (14) and the autophagosome-associated protein LC3 (microtubule-associated protein light chain 3) via its LC3 interacting region (LIR) domain (15). Optineurin regulates autophagosome maturation (16) and autophagic degradation of Salmonella and protein aggregates (15, 17). However, optineurin’s role in mitophagy has not been previously studied. Mutations in optineurin lead to primary open-angle glaucoma (18) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (19), two neurodegenerative diseases in which mitochondrial defects have been observed (20, 21). Thus, optineurin may play a role in regulating the autophagic turnover of damaged mitochondria during mitophagy.Here, we use confocal live cell imaging to show that parkin is both necessary and sufficient to stabilize optineurin on the surface of damaged mitochondria. In the absence of parkin, optineurin puncta transiently localize to damaged mitochondria but do not remain stably associated. In cells expressing parkin, optineurin is recruited to mitochondria following parkin recruitment, and this recruitment is stabilized via the UBAN domain. Following optineurin recruitment, double FYVE-containing protein 1 (DFCP1) puncta transiently localize to parkin/optineurin-labeled damaged mitochondria to mark the initial site of autophagosome formation (22). This is followed by LC3 recruitment and subsequent autophagosome formation around optineurin-labeled damaged mitochondria. Importantly, we find that depletion of optineurin inhibits autophagosome recruitment to damaged mitochondria, leading to increased levels of the mitochondrial matrix protein Hsp60 and mtDNA content within cells. This defect in mitochondrial degradation is rescued by wild-type optineurin but not by the E478G UBAN mutant in optineurin causative for ALS (19) or by an optineurin LIR mutant unable to bind LC3 (15). Optineurin and p62, previously implicated in mitophagy (23–26), are independently recruited to distinct domains on damaged mitochondria. In contrast to our observations with optineurin, depletion of p62 did not inhibit LC3 recruitment or efficient degradation of damaged mitochondria. Thus, our study shows an important role for the autophagy receptor optineurin in parkin-mediated mitophagy and provides support for the hypothesis that defective mitochondrial quality control may contribute to ALS pathogenesis.     

Distinct dopamine neurons mediate reward signals for short- and long-term memories

Drosophila melanogaster can acquire a stable appetitive olfactory memory when the presentation of a sugar reward and an odor are paired. However, the neuronal mechanisms by which a single training induces long-term memory are poorly understood. Here we show that two distinct subsets of dopamine neurons in the fly brain signal reward for short-term (STM) and long-term memories (LTM). One subset induces memory that decays within several hours, whereas the other induces memory that gradually develops after training. They convey reward signals to spatially segregated synaptic domains of the mushroom body (MB), a potential site for convergence. Furthermore, we identified a single type of dopamine neuron that conveys the reward signal to restricted subdomains of the mushroom body lobes and induces long-term memory. Constant appetitive memory retention after a single training session thus comprises two memory components triggered by distinct dopamine neurons.Memory of a momentous event persists for a long time. Whereas some forms of long-term memory (LTM) require repetitive training (1–3), a highly relevant stimulus such as food or poison is sufficient to induce LTM in a single training session (4–7). Recent studies have revealed aspects of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of LTM formation induced by repetitive training (8–11), but how a single training induces a stable LTM is poorly understood (12).Appetitive olfactory learning in fruit flies is suited to address the question, as a presentation of a sugar reward paired with odor induces robust short-term memory (STM) and LTM (6, 7). Odor is represented by a sparse ensemble of the 2,000 intrinsic neurons, the Kenyon cells (13). A current working model suggests that concomitant reward signals from sugar ingestion cause associative plasticity in Kenyon cells that might underlie memory formation (14–20). A single activation session of a specific cluster of dopamine neurons (PAM neurons) by sugar ingestion can induce appetitive memory that is stable over 24 h (19), underscoring the importance of sugar reward to the fly.The mushroom body (MB) is composed of the three different cell types, α/β, α′/β′, and γ, which have distinct roles in different phases of appetitive memories (11, 21–25). Similar to midbrain dopamine neurons in mammals (26, 27), the structure and function of PAM cluster neurons are heterogeneous, and distinct dopamine neurons intersect unique segments of the MB lobes (19, 28–34). Further circuit dissection is thus crucial to identify candidate synapses that undergo associative modulation.By activating distinct subsets of PAM neurons for reward signaling, we found that short- and long-term memories are independently formed by two complementary subsets of PAM cluster dopamine neurons. Conditioning flies with nutritious and nonnutritious sugars revealed that the two subsets could represent different reinforcing properties: sweet taste and nutritional value of sugar. Constant appetitive memory retention after a single training session thus comprises two memory components triggered by distinct reward signals.     

Major diversification of voltage-gated K+ channels occurred in ancestral parahoxozoans

We examined the origins and functional evolution of the Shaker and KCNQ families of voltage-gated K⁺ channels to better understand how neuronal excitability evolved. In bilaterians, the Shaker family consists of four functionally distinct gene families (Shaker, Shab, Shal, and Shaw) that share a subunit structure consisting of a voltage-gated K⁺ channel motif coupled to a cytoplasmic domain that mediates subfamily-exclusive assembly (T1). We traced the origin of this unique Shaker subunit structure to a common ancestor of ctenophores and parahoxozoans (cnidarians, bilaterians, and placozoans). Thus, the Shaker family is metazoan specific but is likely to have evolved in a basal metazoan. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that the Shaker subfamily could predate the divergence of ctenophores and parahoxozoans, but that the Shab, Shal, and Shaw subfamilies are parahoxozoan specific. In support of this, putative ctenophore Shaker subfamily channel subunits coassembled with cnidarian and mouse Shaker subunits, but not with cnidarian Shab, Shal, or Shaw subunits. The KCNQ family, which has a distinct subunit structure, also appears solely within the parahoxozoan lineage. Functional analysis indicated that the characteristic properties of Shaker, Shab, Shal, Shaw, and KCNQ currents evolved before the divergence of cnidarians and bilaterians. These results show that a major diversification of voltage-gated K⁺ channels occurred in ancestral parahoxozoans and imply that many fundamental mechanisms for the regulation of action potential propagation evolved at this time. Our results further suggest that there are likely to be substantial differences in the regulation of neuronal excitability between ctenophores and parahoxozoans.Voltage-gated K⁺ channels are highly conserved among bilaterian metazoans and play a central role in the regulation of excitation in neurons and muscle. Understanding the functional evolution of these channels may therefore provide important insights into how neuromuscular excitation evolved within the Metazoa. Three major gene families, Shaker, KCNQ, and Ether-a-go-go (EAG) encode all voltage-gated K⁺ channels in bilaterians (1, 2). In this study, we examine the functional evolution and origins of the Shaker and KCNQ gene families. Shaker family channels can be definitively identified by a unique subunit structure that includes both a voltage-gated K⁺ channel core and a family-specific cytoplasmic domain within the N terminus known as the T1 domain. T1 mediates assembly of Shaker family subunits into functional tetrameric channels (3, 4). KCNQ channels are also tetrameric but lack a T1 domain and use a distinct coiled-coil assembly domain in the C terminus (5, 6). KCNQ channels can be identified by the presence of this family-specific assembly motif and high amino acid conservation within the K⁺ channel core. Both channel families are found in cnidarians (1, 7) and thus predate the divergence of cnidarians and bilaterians, but their ultimate evolutionary origins have not yet been defined.Shaker family K⁺ channels serve diverse roles in the regulation of neuronal firing and can be divided into four gene subfamilies based on function and sequence homology: Shaker, Shab, Shal, and Shaw (8, 9). The T1 assembly domain is only compatible between subunits from the same gene subfamily (4, 10) and thus serves to keep the subfamilies functionally segregated. Shaker subfamily channels activate rapidly near action potential threshold and range from rapidly inactivating to noninactivating. Multiple roles for Shaker channels in neurons and muscles have been described, but their most unique and fundamental role may be that of axonal action potential repolarization. Shaker channels are clustered to the axon initial segment and nodes of Ranvier in vertebrate neurons (11–13) and underlie the delayed rectifier in squid giant axons (14). The Shaker subfamily is diverse in cnidarians (15, 16), and the starlet sea anemone Nematostella vectensis has functional orthologs of most identified Shaker current types observed in bilaterians (16).The Shab and Shal gene subfamilies encode somatodendritic delayed rectifiers and A currents, respectively (17–20). Shab channels are important for maintaining sustained firing (21, 22), whereas the Kv4-based A current modulates spike threshold and frequency (17). Shab and Shal channels are present in cnidarians, but cnidarian Shab channels have not been functionally characterized, and the only cnidarian Shal channels expressed to date display atypical voltage dependence and kinetics compared with bilaterian channels (23). Shaw channels are rapid, high-threshold channels specialized for sustaining fast firing in vertebrates (24, 25) but have a low activation threshold and may contribute to resting potential in Drosophila (19, 26, 27). A Caenorhabditis elegans Shaw has slow kinetics but a high activation threshold (28), and a single expressed cnidarian Shaw channel has the opposite: a low activation threshold but relatively fast kinetics (29). Thus, the ancestral properties and function of Shaw channels is not yet understood. Further functional characterization of cnidarian Shab, Shal, and Shaw channels would provide a better understanding of the evolutionary status of the Shaker family in early parahoxozoans.KCNQ family channels underlie the M current in vertebrate neurons (30) that regulates subthreshold excitability (31). The M current provides a fundamental mechanism for regulation of firing threshold through the Gq G-protein pathway because KCNQ channels require phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP₂) for activation (32, 33). PIP₂ hydrolysis and subsequent KCNQ channel closure initiated by Gq-coupled receptors produces slow excitatory postsynaptic potentials, during which the probability of firing is greatly increased (32, 33). The key functional adaptations of KCNQ channels for this physiological role that can be observed in vitro are (i) a requirement for PIP₂ to couple voltage-sensor activation to pore opening (34, 35), and (ii) a hyperpolarized voltage–activation curve that allows channels to open below typical action potential thresholds. Both key features are found in vertebrate (30, 34, 36–38), Drosophila (39), and C. elegans (40) KCNQ channels, suggesting they may have been present in KCNQ channels in a bilaterian ancestor. Evolution of the M current likely represented a major advance in the ability to modulate the activity of neuronal circuits, but it is not yet clear when PIP₂-dependent KCNQ channels first evolved.Here, we examine the origins and functional evolution of the Shaker and KCNQ gene families. If we assume the evolution of neuronal signaling provided a major selective pressure for the functional diversification of voltage-gated K⁺ channels, then we can hypothesize that the appearance of these gene families might accompany the emergence of the first nervous systems or a major event in nervous system evolution. Recent phylogenies that place the divergence of ctenophores near the root of the metazoan tree suggest that the first nervous systems, or at least the capacity to make neurons, may have been present in a basal metazoan ancestor (41–43) (Fig. S1). One hypothesis then is that much of the diversity of metazoan voltage-gated channels should be shared between ctenophores and parahoxozoans [cnidarians, bilaterians, and placozoans (44)]. However, genome analysis indicates that many “typical” neuronal genes are missing in ctenophores and the sponges lack a nervous system, leading to the suggestion that extant nervous systems may have evolved independently in ctenophores and parahoxozoans (42, 45). Thus, a second hypothesis is that important steps in voltage-gated K⁺ channel evolution might have occurred separately in ctenophores and parahoxozoans. We tested these hypotheses by carefully examining the phylogenetic distribution and functional evolution of Shaker and KCNQ family K⁺ channels. Our results support a model in which major innovations in neuromuscular excitability occurred specifically within the parahoxozoan lineage.     

Dissecting neural pathways for forgetting in Drosophila olfactory aversive memory

Recent studies have identified molecular pathways driving forgetting and supported the notion that forgetting is a biologically active process. The circuit mechanisms of forgetting, however, remain largely unknown. Here we report two sets of Drosophila neurons that account for the rapid forgetting of early olfactory aversive memory. We show that inactivating these neurons inhibits memory decay without altering learning, whereas activating them promotes forgetting. These neurons, including a cluster of dopaminergic neurons (PAM-β′1) and a pair of glutamatergic neurons (MBON-γ4>γ1γ2), terminate in distinct subdomains in the mushroom body and represent parallel neural pathways for regulating forgetting. Interestingly, although activity of these neurons is required for memory decay over time, they are not required for acute forgetting during reversal learning. Our results thus not only establish the presence of multiple neural pathways for forgetting in Drosophila but also suggest the existence of diverse circuit mechanisms of forgetting in different contexts.Although forgetting commonly has a negative connotation, it is a functional process that shapes memory and cognition (1–4). Recent studies, including work in relatively simple invertebrate models, have started to reveal basic biological mechanisms underlying forgetting (5–15). In Drosophila, single-session Pavlovian conditioning by pairing an odor (conditioned stimulus, CS) with electric shock (unconditioned stimulus, US) induces aversive memories that are short-lasting (16). The memory performance of fruit flies is observed to drop to a negligible level within 24 h, decaying rapidly early after training and slowing down thereafter (17). Memory decay or forgetting requires the activation of the small G protein Rac, a signaling protein involved in actin remodeling, in the mushroom body (MB) intrinsic neurons (6). These so-called Kenyon cells (KCs) are the neurons that integrate CS–US information (18, 19) and support aversive memory formation and retrieval (20–22). In addition to Rac, forgetting also requires the DAMB dopamine receptor (7), which has highly enriched expression in the MB (23). Evidence suggests that the dopamine-mediated forgetting signal is conveyed to the MB by dopamine neurons (DANs) in the protocerebral posterior lateral 1 (PPL1) cluster (7, 24). Therefore, forgetting of olfactory aversive memory in Drosophila depends on a particular set of intracellular molecular pathways within KCs, involving Rac, DAMB, and possibly others (25), and also receives modulation from extrinsic neurons. Although important cellular evidence supporting the hypothesis that memory traces are erased under these circumstances is still lacking, these findings lend support to the notion that forgetting is an active, biologically regulated process (17, 26).Although existing studies point to the MB circuit as essential for forgetting, several questions remain to be answered. First, whereas the molecular pathways for learning and forgetting of olfactory aversive memory are distinct and separable (6, 7), the neural circuits seem to overlap. Rac-mediated forgetting has been localized to a large population of KCs (6), including the γ-subset, which is also critical for initial memory formation (21, 27). The site of action of DAMB for forgetting has yet to be established; however, the subgroups of PPL1-DANs implicated in forgetting are the same as those that signal aversive reinforcement and are required for learning (28–30). It leaves open the question of whether the brain circuitry underlying forgetting and learning is dissociable, or whether forgetting and learning share the same circuit but are driven by distinct activity patterns and molecular machinery (26). Second, shock reinforcement elicits multiple memory traces through at least three dopamine pathways to different subdomains in the MB lobes (28, 29). Functional imaging studies have also revealed Ca²⁺-based memory traces in different KC populations (31). It is poorly understood how forgetting of these memory traces differs, and it remains unknown whether there are multiple regulatory neural pathways. Notably, when PPL1-DANs are inactivated, forgetting still occurs, albeit at a lower rate (7). This incomplete block suggests the existence of an additional pathway(s) that conveys forgetting signals to the MB. Third, other than memory decay over time, forgetting is also observed through interference (32, 33), when new learning or reversal learning is introduced after training (6, 34, 35). Time-based and interference-based forgetting shares a similar dependence on Rac and DAMB (6, 7). However, it is not known whether distinct circuits underlie forgetting in these different contexts.In the current study, we focus on the diverse set of MB extrinsic neurons (MBENs) that interconnect the MB lobes with other brain regions, which include 34 MB output neurons (MBONs) of 21 types and ∼130 dopaminergic neurons of 20 types in the PPL1 and protocerebral anterior medial (PAM) clusters (36, 37). These neurons have been intensively studied in olfactory memory formation, consolidation, and retrieval in recent years (e.g., 24, 28–30, 38–48); however, their roles in forgetting have not been characterized except for the aforementioned PPL1-DANs. In a functional screen, we unexpectedly found that several Gal4 driver lines of MBENs showed significantly better 3-h memory retention when the Gal4-expressing cells were inactivated. The screen has thus led us to identify two types of MBENs that are not involved in initial learning but play important and additive roles in mediating memory decay. Furthermore, neither of these MBEN types is required for reversal learning, supporting the notion that there is a diversity of neural circuits that drive different forms of forgetting.     

Dopamine release from transplanted neural stem cells in Parkinsonian rat striatum in vivo

Embryonic stem cell-based therapies exhibit great potential for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) because they can significantly rescue PD-like behaviors. However, whether the transplanted cells themselves release dopamine in vivo remains elusive. We and others have recently induced human embryonic stem cells into primitive neural stem cells (pNSCs) that are self-renewable for massive/transplantable production and can efficiently differentiate into dopamine-like neurons (pNSC–DAn) in culture. Here, we showed that after the striatal transplantation of pNSC–DAn, (i) pNSC–DAn retained tyrosine hydroxylase expression and reduced PD-like asymmetric rotation; (ii) depolarization-evoked dopamine release and reuptake were significantly rescued in the striatum both in vitro (brain slices) and in vivo, as determined jointly by microdialysis-based HPLC and electrochemical carbon fiber electrodes; and (iii) the rescued dopamine was released directly from the grafted pNSC–DAn (and not from injured original cells). Thus, pNSC–DAn grafts release and reuptake dopamine in the striatum in vivo and alleviate PD symptoms in rats, providing proof-of-concept for human clinical translation.Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a chronic progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the specific loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta and their projecting axons, resulting in loss of dopamine (DA) release in the striatum (1). During the last two decades, cell-replacement therapy has proven, at least experimentally, to be a potential treatment for PD patients (2–7) and in animal models (8–15). The basic principle of cell therapy is to restore the DA release by transplanting new DA-like cells. Until recently, obtaining enough transplantable cells was a major bottleneck in the practicability of cell therapy for PD. One possible source is embryonic stem cells (ESCs), which can develop infinitely into self-renewable pluripotent cells with the potential to generate any type of cell, including DA neurons (DAns) (16, 17).Recently, several groups including us have introduced rapid and efficient ways to generate primitive neural stem cells (pNSCs) from human ESCs using small-molecule inhibitors under chemically defined conditions (12, 18, 19). These cells are nonpolarized neuroepithelia and retain plasticity upon treatment with neuronal developmental morphogens. Importantly, pNSCs differentiate into DAns (pNSC–DAn) with high efficiency (∼65%) after patterning by sonic hedgehog (SHH) and fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8) in vitro, providing an immediate and renewable source of DAns for PD treatment. Importantly, the striatal transplantation of human ESC-derived DA-like neurons, including pNSC–DAn, are able to relieve the motor defects in a PD rat model (11–13, 15, 19–23). Before attempting clinical translation of pNSC–DAn, however, there are two fundamental open questions. (i) Can pNSC–DAn functionally restore the striatal DA levels in vivo? (ii) What cells release the restored DA, pNSC–DAn themselves or resident neurons/cells repaired by the transplants?Regarding question 1, a recent study using nafion-coated carbon fiber electrodes (CFEs) reported that the amperometric current is rescued in vivo by ESC (pNSC–DAn-like) therapy (19). Both norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin are present in the striatum (24, 25). However, CFE amperometry/chronoamperometry alone cannot distinguish DA from other monoamines in vivo, such as NE and serotonin (Fig. S1) (see also refs. 26–28). Considering that the compounds released from grafted ESC-derived cells are unknown, the work of Kirkeby et al. was unable to determine whether DA or other monoamines are responsible for the restored amperometric signal. Thus, the key question of whether pNSC–DAn can rescue DA release needs to be reexamined for the identity of the restored amperometric signal in vivo.Regarding question 2, many studies have proposed that DA is probably released from the grafted cells (8, 12, 13, 20), whereas others have proposed that the grafted stem cells might restore striatal DA levels by rescuing injured original cells (29, 30). Thus, whether the grafted cells are actually capable of synthesizing and releasing DA in vivo must be investigated to determine the future cellular targets (residual cells versus pNSC–DAn) of treatment.To address these two mechanistic questions, advanced in vivo methods of DA identification and DA recording at high spatiotemporal resolution are required. Currently, microdialysis-based HPLC (HPLC) (31–33) and CFE amperometric recordings (34, 35) have been used independently by different laboratories to assess evoked DA release from the striatum in vivo. The major advantage of microdialysis-based HPLC is to identify the substances secreted in the cell-grafted striatum (33), but its spatiotemporal resolution is too low to distinguish the DA release site (residual cells or pNSC–DAn). In contrast, the major advantage of CFE-based amperometry is its very high temporal (ms) and spatial (μm) resolution, making it possible to distinguish the DA release site (residual cells or pNSC–DAn) in cultured cells, brain slices, and in vivo (34–39), but it is unable to distinguish between low-level endogenous oxidizable substances (DA versus serotonin and NE) in vivo.In the present study, we developed a challenging experimental paradigm of combining the two in vivo methods, microdialysis-based HPLC and CFE amperometry, to identify the evoked substance as DA and its release site as pNSC–DAn in the striatum of PD rats.     

Species formation by host shifting in avian malaria parasites

The malaria parasites (Apicomplexa: Haemosporida) of birds are believed to have diversified across the avian host phylogeny well after the origin of most major host lineages. Although many symbionts with direct transmission codiversify with their hosts, mechanisms of species formation in vector-borne parasites, including the role of host shifting, are poorly understood. Here, we examine the hosts of sister lineages in a phylogeny of 181 putative species of malaria parasites of New World terrestrial birds to determine the role of shifts between host taxa in the formation of new parasite species. We find that host shifting, often across host genera and families, is the rule. Sympatric speciation by host shifting would require local reproductive isolation as a prerequisite to divergent selection, but this mechanism is not supported by the generalized host-biting behavior of most vectors of avian malaria parasites. Instead, the geographic distribution of individual parasite lineages in diverse hosts suggests that species formation is predominantly allopatric and involves host expansion followed by local host–pathogen coevolution and secondary sympatry, resulting in local shifting of parasite lineages across hosts.Cospeciation of symbionts with their hosts has been recognized in parasites with strong vertical transmission (1, 2), viruses that spread by direct contact (3), and bacterial and viral symbionts passed from mother to offspring through the egg (4). Species formation in parasites that are transmitted between hosts by vectors is less well-understood (5, 6). Poor matching between the phylogenetic trees of vector-borne hemosporidian (malaria) parasites and their North American avian hosts suggests a predominance of host shifting compared with cospeciation (7) (reviewed in a broader context in ref. 8). Whether host shifting occurs primarily between closely related hosts and in geographic sympatry, and whether rates of host shifting followed by species formation are sufficient to explain the contemporary diversity of hemosporidian parasites, have not been determined.Many species of hemosporidian parasites have been described and named based primarily on the microscopic morphology of meronts and gametocytes in blood smears (9). The more recent discovery of hundreds of lineages based on DNA sequence variation in the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cyt b) (5, 10, 11) requires, however, a different species concept based on analysis of independent components of the genome (12–16). Recent estimates of the rate of molecular evolution in hemosporidian mitochondrial genes imply that the contemporary malaria parasites of vertebrates might have descended from a common ancestor within the past 20 (17) or 40 Ma (18) or, perhaps, a longer time period (19). Although an appropriate calibration for the rate of hemosporidian evolution remains unsettled (20, 21), host shifting almost certainly has been frequent, likely across great host distances at times, over the recent history of the group.Speciation in sympatry (i.e., in the absence of geographic barriers to gene flow through local host specialization) might follow host shifting if mating between parasites was assortative with respect to vertebrate host or if different hosts imposed strong disruptive selection on parasites (22). However, despite some documented feeding preferences (23–25), dipteran vectors of avian malaria parasites do not seem to be sufficiently specialized to isolate populations of parasites on different hosts (26–29). In addition, many parasite species and many parasite lineages distinguished by DNA sequence variation occur locally across broad ranges of hosts without apparent differentiation, at least in the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (30–32) and several nuclear markers (12, 14). Alternatively, host shifting in one allopatric population of a parasite species could be followed, after sufficient host–pathogen coevolution and evolutionary differentiation to produce reproductive incompatibility, by secondary sympatry, thereby increasing local parasite diversity.Here, we examine recent nodes in an mtDNA-based phylogeny of New World hemosporidian parasites to determine the degree to which lineage formation is associated with host shifting. Although our phylogenetic reconstruction is based on a single mitochondrial gene (cyt b), phylogenies based on genes from the mitochondrial, nuclear, and apicoplast genomes are broadly consistent for the relatively recent nodes considered in this analysis (6, 12–14, 33–35). In addition, analyses of avian hemosporidian parasites based on multiple independent markers have distinguished mtDNA-defined lineages on the basis of significant linkage disequilibrium (13).We distinguish as species the lineages that differ in their mtDNA cytochrome b gene sequence (by as few as 2 nt) and, for the most part, occur in either different hosts in the same local area or the same or different hosts in different geographic areas (32, 36). In some cases, closely related lineages occur in the same host locally. Sister lineages in this analysis differ by an average of about 1% sequence divergence, although some sequences separated by as little as a single nucleotide can exhibit consistent host or geographic differences. Inference concerning the mode of species formation is based primarily on host and geographic distributions of these hemosporidian mtDNA lineages. However, the correspondence between lineages and reproductively isolated species is poorly resolved (13, 37, 38). Each node was designated as either sympatric or allopatric depending on whether the descendant lineages occurred on the same West Indian islands or in the same regions within larger continental areas. The status of closely related parasite lineages occurring locally in the same host species is ambiguous, but these lineages might reflect genetic variation within a parasite species.Previous analyses have suggested that host shifting, rather than codivergence, predominates species formation in the hemosporidian parasites of birds (5, 7). We find this most frequently to be the case in this analysis, and we discuss whether species formation by host shifting occurs primarily in sympatry or allopatry.     

Hyperpolarization-activated,cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channels in Aplysia: Contribution to classical conditioning

Hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated cation (HCN) channels are critical regulators of neuronal excitability, but less is known about their possible roles in synaptic plasticity and memory circuits. Here, we characterized the HCN gene organization, channel properties, distribution, and involvement in associative and nonassociative forms of learning in Aplysia californica. Aplysia has only one HCN gene, which codes for a channel that has many similarities to the mammalian HCN channel. The cloned acHCN gene was expressed in Xenopus oocytes, which displayed a hyperpolarization-induced inward current that was enhanced by cGMP as well as cAMP. Similarly to its homologs in other animals, acHCN is permeable to K⁺ and Na⁺ ions, and is selectively blocked by Cs⁺ and ZD7288. We found that acHCN is predominantly expressed in inter- and motor neurons, including LFS siphon motor neurons, and therefore tested whether HCN channels are involved in simple forms of learning of the siphon-withdrawal reflex in a semiintact preparation. ZD7288 (100 μM) significantly reduced an associative form of learning (classical conditioning) but had no effect on two nonassociative forms of learning (intermediate-term sensitization and unpaired training) or baseline responses. The HCN current is enhanced by nitric oxide (NO), which may explain the postsynaptic role of NO during conditioning. HCN current in turn enhances the NMDA-like current in the motor neurons, suggesting that HCN channels contribute to conditioning through this pathway.Hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN), cation nonselective ion channels generate hyperpolarization-activated inward currents (I_h) and thus tend to stabilize membrane potential (1–3). In addition, binding of cyclic nucleotides (cAMP and cGMP) to the C-terminal cyclic nucleotide binding domain (CNBD) enhances I_h and thus couples membrane excitability with intracellular signaling pathways (2, 4). HCN channels are widely important for numerous systemic functions such as hormonal regulation, heart contractility, epilepsy, pain, central pattern generation, sensory perception (4–15), and learning and memory (16–24).However, in previous studies it has been difficult to relate the cellular effects of HCN channels directly to their behavioral effects, because of the immense complexity of the mammalian brain. We have therefore investigated the role of HCN channels in Aplysia, which has a numerically simpler nervous system (25). We first identified and characterized an HCN gene in Aplysia, and showed that it codes for a channel that has many similarities to the mammalian HCN channel. We found that the Aplysia HCN channel is predominantly expressed in motor neurons including LFS neurons in the siphon withdrawal reflex circuit (26, 27). We therefore investigated simple forms of learning of that reflex in a semiintact preparation (28–30) and found that HCN current is involved in classical conditioning and enhances the NMDA-like current in the motor neurons. These results provide a direct connection between HCN channels and behavioral learning and suggest a postsynaptic mechanism of that effect. HCN current in turn is enhanced by nitric oxide (NO), a transmitter of facilitatory interneurons, and thus may contribute to the postsynaptic role of NO during conditioning.     

BMP signaling is required for the generation of primordial germ cells in an insect

Two modes of germ cell formation are known in animals. Specification through maternally inherited germ plasm occurs in many well-characterized model organisms, but most animals lack germ plasm by morphological and functional criteria. The only known alternative mechanism is induction, experimentally described only in mice, which specify germ cells through bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signal-mediated induction of a subpopulation of mesodermal cells. Until this report, no experimental evidence of an inductive germ cell signal for specification has been available outside of vertebrates. Here we provide functional genetic experimental evidence consistent with a role for BMP signaling in germ cell formation in a basally branching insect. We show that primordial germ cells of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus transduce BMP signals and require BMP pathway activity for their formation. Moreover, increased BMP activity leads to ectopic and supernumerary germ cells. Given the commonality of BMP signaling in mouse and cricket germ cell induction, we suggest that BMP-based germ cell formation may be a shared ancestral mechanism in animals.There are two well-characterized modes of animal germ cell specification. In the inheritance mode, observed in Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Xenopus laevis, maternally provided cytoplasmic determinants (germ plasm) specify a subset of early embryonic cells as germ cells. In contrast, mice specify their germ line through the induction mode, in which a zygotic cell–cell signaling mechanism specifies germ cells later in development. We previously hypothesized that the inductive mode was ancestral among metazoans and that the inheritance mode had evolved independently in multiple derived lineages (1, 2). Consistent with this hypothesis, multiple basally branching insects do not segregate maternally provided germ plasm, unlike the relatively derived Drosophila model (3, 4). However, experimental evidence for the inductive mode was available only for salamanders (5, 6) and mice (7–10), and to date, inferences of induction outside of vertebrates have been based on gene expression and cytological data (1, 11–16).Because Drosophila is highly derived with respect to many aspects of development (17), we examined germ cell development in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, a basally branching insect that may shed light on putative ancestral mechanisms of specifying germ cells. We previously showed that unlike Drosophila, Gryllus primordial germ cell (PGC) specification requires zygotic mechanisms rather than germ plasm or the oskar germ-line determinant (4, 18). However, the signals that might induce PGC formation in Gryllus remained unknown. Because mammals require the highly conserved bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathway to specify PGCs (8–10, 19, 20), we investigated BMP signaling as a candidate for regulating inductive germ cell specification in Gryllus.     

Massive accumulation of luminal protease-deficient axonal lysosomes at Alzheimer’s disease amyloid plaques

Through a comprehensive analysis of organellar markers in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease, we document a massive accumulation of lysosome-like organelles at amyloid plaques and establish that the majority of these organelles reside within swollen axons that contact the amyloid deposits. This close spatial relationship between axonal lysosome accumulation and extracellular amyloid aggregates was observed from the earliest stages of β-amyloid deposition. Notably, we discovered that lysosomes that accumulate in such axons are lacking in multiple soluble luminal proteases and thus are predicted to be unable to efficiently degrade proteinaceous cargos. Of relevance to Alzheimer’s disease, β-secretase (BACE1), the protein that initiates amyloidogenic processing of the amyloid precursor protein and which is a substrate for these proteases, builds up at these sites. Furthermore, through a comparison between the axonal lysosome accumulations at amyloid plaques and neuronal lysosomes of the wild-type brain, we identified a similar, naturally occurring population of lysosome-like organelles in neuronal processes that is also defined by its low luminal protease content. In conjunction with emerging evidence that the lysosomal maturation of endosomes and autophagosomes is coupled to their retrograde transport, our results suggest that extracellular β-amyloid deposits cause a local impairment in the retrograde axonal transport of lysosome precursors, leading to their accumulation and a blockade in their further maturation. This study both advances understanding of Alzheimer’s disease brain pathology and provides new insights into the subcellular organization of neuronal lysosomes that may have broader relevance to other neurodegenerative diseases with a lysosomal component to their pathology.Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia associated with aging. Nonetheless, more than a century after the original definition of the disease, the identification of the fundamental cell biological processes that cause AD remains a major challenge. Major defining features of AD brain pathology, as elucidated by molecular and genetic studies in humans and mice, are as follows: the proteolytic processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by the successive action of β- and γ-secretases to generate the toxic Aβ peptides, the accumulation of extracellular aggregates of Aβ, synapse dysfunction, and death of specific subpopulations of neurons (1–6). However, although mutations that result in enhanced APP expression and/or altered processing of APP into Aβ peptides drive the development of a subset of early onset familial forms of AD, the causes of the vastly more common late-onset AD are much less well understood.One major aspect of AD pathology that is observed in both humans and mouse models of the disease is the formation of amyloid plaques. These structures contain a core of aggregated extracellular Aβ that is surrounded by swollen, dystrophic neurites and microglial processes (7–13). Multiple studies in humans and mice have additionally reported an elevated abundance of putative lysosomes and/or lysosomal proteins around amyloid plaques (9–11, 14–16). These observations indicate an influence of extracellular β-amyloid deposits on the physiology of surrounding cells and raise questions about the underlying cell biological mechanisms and the contributions of such pathological changes to AD.The goal of this study was to investigate the cell biology of AD amyloid plaques to advance understanding of how the interactions between extracellular Aβ aggregates and surrounding brain tissues might contribute to disease pathology. Through studies of mouse models of AD, we found a robust relationship between extracellular Aβ aggregates and the massive accumulation of lysosomes (but not other organelles) within swollen axons adjacent to such aggregates. A striking new feature of the lysosomes that accumulate within these dystrophic axons is their relatively low levels of multiple lysosomal proteases. Because we also identified a subpopulation of lysosomes with similar properties in the distal neuronal compartments of normal brain tissue and primary neuron cultures, the distinct composition of the axonal lysosomes that accumulate at amyloid plaques most likely reflects a blockade in their retrograde transport and maturation. More broadly, our characterization of a distinct population of axonal lysosomes that is selectively accumulated at amyloid plaques provides a foundation for the future elucidation of the mechanisms that underlie their biogenesis, function, and contributions to neuronal physiology and pathology.