Inversions of the Factor VIII Gene in Japanese Patients with Severe Hemophilia A

Hemophilia A is genetically very heterogeneous because disease-causing mutations involving deletions, point mutations, insertions, and inversions are scattered throughout the factor VIII gene. Of these mutations, inversions, which are intrachromosomal recombinations between int22h- 1 (intron 22 homologous region 1) and 1 of 2 other extragenic copies located 500 kilobases upstream, are the more frequently found defects, especially in patients with severe hemophilia A. Reportedly, approximately half of all severe hemophilia A patients have inversions in intron 22. A group of unrelated patients from the middle of Japan with severe hemophilia A were screened by Southern blot analysis for gene inversions. Forty-two of 100 severely affected patients presented factor VIII gene rearrangements. Of these patients, 36 exhibited the distal type of inversion, and 6 exhibited the proximal type. No other variant type of recombination was observed. In this study, neither the prevalence of inhibitor development against factor VIII nor the frequency of sporadic cases in the group presenting gene inversions was significantly different from that in the group without chromosomal inversions. Southern blot analysis successfully detected a carrier in a hemophilia family for which no patient was available. Genetic counseling of patients with severe hemophilia A and their families will be considerably improved, because the inversions occur in 42% of the Japanese patients with severe hemophilia.     

Analysis of intron 22 inversions of the factor VIII gene in severe hemophilia A: implications for genetic counseling

Intrachromosomal recombinations involving F8A, in intron 22 of the factor VIII gene, and one of two homologous regions 500 kb 5' of the factor VIII gene result in large inversions of DNA at the tip of the X chromosome. The gene is disrupted, causing severe hemophilia A. Two inversions are possible, distal and proximal, depending on which homologous region is involved in the recombination event. A simple Southern blotting technique was used to identify patients and carriers of these inversions. In a group of 85 severe hemophilia A patients, 47% had an inversion, of which 80% were of the distal type. There was no association with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) haplotypes. The technique has identified a definitive genetic marker in families previously uninformative on RFLP analysis and provided valuable information for genetic counselling information may now be provided for carriers without the need to study intervening family members and the diagnosis of severe hemophilia A made in families with only a nonspecific history of bleeding. Analysis of intron 22 inversion should now be the first-line test for carrier diagnosis and genetic counselling for severe hemophilia A and may be particularly useful when there is no affected male family member or when intervening family members are unavailable for testing.     

Molecular characterization of severe hemophilia A suggests that about half the mutations are not within the coding regions and splice junctions of the factor VIII gene.

Hemophilia A is an X chromosome-linked disorder resulting from deficiency of factor VIII, an important protein in blood coagulation. A large number of disease-producing mutations have been reported in the factor VIII gene. However, a comprehensive analysis of the mutations has been difficult because of the large gene size, its many scattered exons, and the high frequency of de novo mutations. Recently, we have shown that nearly all mutations resulting in mild-to-moderate hemophilia A can be detected by PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). In this study, we attempted to discover the mutations causing severe hemophilia A by analyzing 47 unselected patients, 30 of whom had severe hemophilia and 17 of whom had mild-to-moderate disease. Using DGGE as a screening method, we analyzed 99% of the coding region, 94% of the splice junctions, the promoter region, and the polyadenylylation site of the gene. We found the mutation in 16 of 17 (94%) patients with mild-to-moderate disease but in only 16 of 30 (53%) patients with severe hemophilia A. Since DGGE after computer analysis appears to detect all mutations in a given fragment, the lower-than-expected yield of mutations in patients with severe disease is likely not due to failure of the detection method; it is probably due to the presence of mutations in DNA sequences outside the regions studied. Such sequences may include locus-controlling regions, other sequences within introns or outside the gene that are important for its expression, or another gene involved in factor VIII expression that is very closely linked to the factor VIII gene.     

Factor 8 (F8) gene mutation profile of Turkish hemophilia A patients with inhibitors.

Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy is ineffective in hemophilia A patients who develop alloantibodies (inhibitors) against FVIII. The type of factor 8 (F8) gene mutation, genes in the major histocompatibility complex loci, and also polymorphisms in IL-10 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha are the major predisposing factors for inhibitor formation. The present study was initiated to reveal the F8 gene mutation profile of 30 severely affected high-responder patients with inhibitor levels of more than 5 Bethesda U (BU)/ml and four low-responder patients with inhibitors less than 5 BU/ml. Southern blot and PCR analysis were performed to detect intron 22 and intron 1 inversions, respectively. Point mutations were screened by DNA sequence analysis of all coding regions, intron/exon boundaries, promoter and 3' UTR regions of the F8 gene. The prevalent mutation was the intron 22 inversion among the high-responder patients followed by large deletions, small deletions, and nonsense mutations. Only one missense and one splicing error mutation was seen. Among the low-responder patients, three single nucleotide deletions and one intron 22 inversion were found. All mutation types detected were in agreement with the severe hemophilia A phenotype, most likely leading to a deficiency of and predisposition to the development of alloantibodies against FVIII. It is seen that Turkish hemophilia A patients with major molecular defects have a higher possibility of developing inhibitors.     

Clinical correlates among 49 families with hemophilia A and factor VIII gene inversions

Inversions between a gene A copy within intron 22 of the factor VIII gene and additional copies outside the factor VIII gene were found in 49 families with hemophilia A. Inversion patterns were that of recombination with a distal gene A copy in 34, a proximal copy in 14, and a third (variant) copy in one. Baseline factor VIII clotting activity levels were <1% of normal in 43 and 1% in 6. No inversion was detected in 61 other families whose affected members had ≤1% activity levels nor in 42 families with moderately severe hemophilia A and 2–5% baseline levels. Both high titer and low level alloantibody inhibitors were found in patients with or without an inversion. Of 13 high titer inhibitors, 8 were persistent and 1 of these patients had an inversion. Of 5 that responded to daily factor VIII infusions, 4 were in patients with gene inversions. Of the 49 families with an inversion, the occurrence of hemophilia was isolated in 30 and the mother was a carrier in the 25 in which additional family members were informative. In three of these families with isolated occurrence, the maternal grandmother was a carrier whereas in three others a de novo mutation occurred in the maternal grandfather's factor VIII gene. Screening for gene inversions in patients with severe (or “borderline” severe) hemophilia A provides a direct marker of the mutation in 45% of families. It is useful even if there is no living affected member and in predicting the likely severity of an infant in which there are no reliable baseline clotting activities, including 70% of families with isolated occurrences of hemophilia A. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Molecular characterization of mild-to-moderate hemophilia A: detection of the mutation in 25 of 29 patients by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.

To date it has been difficult to characterize completely a genetic disorder, such as hemophilia A, in which the involved gene is large and unrelated affected individuals have different mutations, most of which are point mutations. Toward this end, we analyzed the DNA of 29 patients with mild-to-moderate hemophilia A in which the causative mutation is likely to be a missense mutation. Using computer analysis, we determined the melting properties of factor VIII gene sequences to design primer sets for PCR amplification and subsequent denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). A total of 45 primer sets was chosen to amplify 99% of the coding region of the gene and 41 of 50 splice junctions. To facilitate detection of point mutations, we mixed DNA from two male patients, and both homoduplexes and heteroduplexes were analyzed. With these 45 primer sets, 26 DNAs containing previously identified point mutations in the factor VIII gene were studied, and all 26 mutations were easily distinguishable from normal. After analyzing the 29 patients with unknown mutations, we identified the disease-producing mutation in 25 (86%). Two polymorphisms and two rare normal variants were also found. Therefore, DGGE after computer analysis is a powerful method for nearly complete characterization of disease-producing mutations and polymorphisms in large genes such as that for factor VIII.     

New Insight into the Molecular Basis of Hemophilia A

Since publication of the sequence of the factor VIII gene (F8) in 1984, a large number of mutations that cause hemophilia A (HA) have been identified. With the technical advances associated with mutation screenings, it is now possible to identify a putative F8 sequence alteration in the great majority of HA patients. The mutation spectrum includes 2 inversion hot spots (intron 1 and intron 22 inversions) mediated by intrachromosomal recombination between 2 copies of long inverted repeats, one of which lies within the F8 gene whereas the other is extragenic. Point mutations are distributed over all of the exons, and deletions or insertions of different sizes and mutations affecting splice sites account for the rest of the known mutations. In a small number of cases, however, we are unable to find any disease-determining DNA changes in the coding regions of the F8 gene. This fact points to possibilities of unknown gene rearrangements that disrupt the F8 gene or mutations in other genes that play a role in the processing/secretion of the factor VIII protein. Moreover, the proof of an absence of F8 messenger RNA (mRNA) in one patient points to either a defect in the expression of F8 mRNA or its rapid degradation, which may represent a novel mechanism leading to HA.     

Factor VIII gene inversions in severe hemophilia A: results of an international consortium study

Twenty-two molecular diagnostic laboratories from 14 countries participated in a consortium study to estimate the impact of Factor VIII gene inversions in severe hemophilia A. A total of 2,093 patients with severe hemophilia A were studied; of those, 740 (35%) had a type 1 (distal) factor VIII inversion, and 140 (7%) showed a type 2 (proximal) inversion. In 25 cases, the molecular analysis showed additional abnormal or polymorphic patterns. Ninety-eight percent of 532 mothers of patients with inversions were carriers of the abnormal factor VIII gene; when only mothers of nonfamilial cases were studied, 9 de novo inversions in maternal germ cells were observed among 225 cases (approximately 1 de novo maternal origin of the inversion in 25 mothers of sporadic cases). When the maternal grandparental origin was examined, the inversions occurred de novo in male germ cells in 69 cases and female germ cells in 1 case. The presence of factor VIII inversions is not a major predisposing factor for the development of factor VIII inhibitors; however, slightly more patients with severe hemophilia A and factor VIII inversions develop inhibitors (130 of 642 [20%]) than patients with severe hemophilia A without inversions (131 of 821 [16%]).     

Correlation between factor VIII genotype and inhibitor development in hemophilia A

The development of neutralizing antibodies, or inhibitors, against infused factor VIII represents a significant complication of treatment for hemophilia A. Although it is likely that both genetic and environmental factors influence whether patients form inhibitors, correlations between types of factor VIII mutations and inhibitor development are becoming apparent. Approximately 20% of all patients with severe hemophilia A generate inhibitors. Of these inhibitor patients, 90% have inversions, large deletions or nonsense mutations of the factor VIII gene that would be predicted to eliminate production of factor VIII antigen. In contrast to patients with severe disease, inhibitor formation in patients with mild/moderate hemophilia A is rare. Inhibitor patients with mild/moderate disease typically have missense mutations that may cause local conformational changes within immunogenic domains of factor VIII and lead to production of dysfunctional antigen. Taken together, hemophilia A patients are predisposed to inhibitor development with mutations causing infused factor VIII to be perceived as either 1) a completely novel antigen or 2) an immunologically altered antigen.     

Direct detection of a common inversion mutation in the genetic diagnosis of severe hemophilia A [see comments]

Two recent reports suggest that approximately 50% of the cases of severe hemophilia A (factor VIII:C < 0.01 U/mL) may be caused by a gross rearrangement of the factor VIII gene. The mutation involves genomic sequence from exon 1 to within intron 22 of the gene in an inversion event. This rearrangement can be detected on a Southern blot using a probe that is complementary to sequence from within intron 22. In this report, we describe the analysis of 71 severe hemophilia A patients for the presence of this mutation. Thirty-two of the patients (45%) showed evidence of the rearrangement, a figure that confirms the initial reports on 28 patients. Five different patterns of rearrangement have been noted, although two of these patterns (pattern 1 [70%] and pattern 2 [16%]) account for the majority of cases. The other patterns of rearrangement appear to be confined to individual families and may represent the result of additional sequence variation within the region of the genome to which the proximal 22 exons of factor VIII are translocated. Analysis of this patient population for the factor VIII inversion mutation has been extremely useful in a molecular diagnostic sense. In 23 of the cases studied (72%), the affected individual was the only documented hemophiliac in the family and, thus, previous linkage analysis had been limited to the provision of exclusion testing only. In conclusion, it appears that testing for the factor VIII inversion mutation will be positive in approximately 45% of severe hemophiliacs and as such should constitute the initial stage in the genetic testing protocol for these patients' families.     

Mutations of factor VIII cleavage sites in hemophilia A

Hemophilia A is caused by a defect in coagulation factor VIII, a protein that undergoes extensive proteolysis during its activation and inactivation. To determine whether some cases of hemophilia are caused by mutations in important cleavage sites, we screened patient DNA samples for mutations in these sites by a two-step process. Regions of interest were amplified from genomic DNA by repeated rounds of primer- directed DNA synthesis. The amplified DNAs were then screened for mutations by discriminant hybridization using oligonucleotide probes. Two cleavage site mutations were found in a survey of 215 patients. A nonsense mutation in the activated protein C cleavage site at amino acid 336 was discovered in a patient with severe hemophilia. In another severely affected patient, a mis-sense mutation results in a substitution of cysteine for arginine in the thrombin activation site at amino acid 1689. This defect is associated with no detectable factor VIII activity, but with normal levels of factor VIII antigen. The severe hemophilia in this patient was sporadic; analysis of the mother suggested that the mutation originated in her gametes or during her embryogenesis. The results demonstrate that this approach can be used to identify factor VIII gene mutations in regions of the molecule known to be important for function.     

A novel DNA inversion causing severe hemophilia A

Almost half of all cases of severe hemophilia A are caused by recurrent DNA inversions, which disrupt the factor VIII (FVIII) gene. These inversions generally occur between a region of intron 22 (int22h) and one of two homologous copies of this region, located 300 to 400 kb telomeric to the FVIII gene. They are routinely detected by a Bcl I Southern blot assay in which the sizes of two of the three normal hybridization bands are characteristically altered. However, atypical hybridization patterns have been observed, and this report describes the first detailed analysis of a hemophilia A patient with such a pattern. The abnormal result was found to be caused by a novel FVIII inversion involving an extra copy of int22h from a site only 70 to 200 kb telomeric of the FVIII gene. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) allowed one of the inversion junctions to be analyzed, showing that the int22h sequence at this inversion junction was truncated. This patient and his novel inversion provide further evidence that int22h is associated with instability in Xq28.     

Mutational spectrum of F8 gene and prothrombotic gene variants in haemophilia A patients from Southern Italy

Summary.  Haemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked recessive haemorrhagic disorder caused by a deficiency of coagulation factor VIII. Disease causative mutations are heterogeneous and spread all over the F8 gene sequence, with the exception of intron 22 inversion occurring in about 50% of severe patients. To define the specific mutational repertoire and mutation detection rate, we analysed F8 gene, by polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing, in 128 unrelated patients from Southern Italy with severe ( n  = 108), moderate ( n  = 9) or mild ( n  = 11) HA. We identified 120 mutations, including 64 cases of intron 22 inversion (53.3%), three of intron 1 inversion (2.5%), one large deletion (0,8%) and 52 point mutations (43.3%). In particular, 19/120 were novel and 7/52 point mutations (13.5%) occurred at CpG sites. We also investigated eight prothrombotic genetic variants in a subgroup of 74 severe HA patients to evaluate their possible protective effect on the severity of clinical expression. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase A1298C and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 4G variants recurred more frequently in HA patients with a less-severe phenotype. Clinical impact of these findings needs large-scale studies to further define the role of these prothrombotic variants as possible modifier factors of HA phenotype.     

Mutations and a polymorphism in the factor VIII gene discovered by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.

Hemophilia A results from mutations in the gene coding for coagulation factor VIII. We used denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to screen for mutations in the region of the factor VIII gene coding for the first acidic domain. Amplification primers were designed employing the MELTMAP computer program to optimize the ability to detect mutations. Screening of amplified DNA from 228 unselected hemophilia A patients revealed two mutations and one polymorphism. Rescreening the same population by making heteroduplexes between amplified patient and control samples prior to electrophoresis revealed one additional mutation. The mutations include two missense and one 4-base-pair deletion, and each mutation was found in patients with severe hemophilia. The polymorphism, located adjacent to the adenine branch site in intron 7, is useful for genetic prediction in some cases where the Bcl I and Xba I polymorphisms are uninformative. These results suggest that DNA amplification and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis should be an excellent strategy for identifying mutations and polymorphisms in defined regions of the factor VIII gene and other large genes.     

Screening of intron 1 inversion and three intragenic factor VIII gene polymorphisms in Pakistani hemophilia A families

Indirect linkage analysis using highly informative polymorphic markers is the method of choice for carrier detection of hemophilia A in developing countries because direct DNA or mRNA sequence analysis is manifold costly and difficult than indirect gene tracking. Worldwide populations have revealed marked variation in the informativeness of polymorphic markers because of which each country has to select its own panel of markers for linkage analysis in hemophilia A families. The present study aimed at determining the informativeness of three factor VIII gene polymorphisms [intron 13(CA)n repeats, HindIII and AlwNI] in the Pakistani population. One hundred and forty-three individuals from 32 hemophilia A families and 68 unrelated anonymous females from the general population were screened for these polymorphisms using PCR and RFLP techniques. An inversion in intron 1 of the factor VIII gene causing 2-5% of severe hemophilia A cases was also screened in 128 Pakistani hemophilia A patients. None of the affected individuals carried the intron 1 inversion at least in peripheral blood leucocytes. The informativeness of intron 13 repeats, HindIII and AlwNI was 59.1% (13/22 hemophilia A families revealing five different alleles), 40.6% (13/32 hemophilia A families) and 6.25% (2/32 hemophilia A families), respectively. The cumulative informativeness of intron 13 repeats and HindIII was 63.6% (14/22 hemophilia A families), revealing strong linkage disequilibrium between these two polymorphic markers. These results suggest that there is a need to determine the informativeness of other polymorphic markers of the factor VIII gene to achieve 100% success rate for carrier detection of hemophilia A in Pakistan.     

A female hemophilia A combined with hereditary coagulation factor XII deficiency: a case report.

A 2-year-old Japanese girl with easy bruising and arthropathy was demonstrated to have severe hemophilia A (Factor VIII activity: less than 0.01 U/ml). She had normal 46XX karyotype. Her brother also had hemophilia A, and her mother and grandmother seem to be hemophiliac carriers. Additionally, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) of the patient was disproportionately prolonged and there were reduced levels of coagulation factor XII in the patients and members of the maternal trait which are compatible with heterozygous factor XII deficiency. Her father had both normal factor VIII and factor XII levels. Southern blotting analysis of genomic DNA from the propositus and family members with factor VIII and factor XII DNA probes revealed no gross alterations. This patient represents a female hemophilia A combined with heterozygous factor XII deficiency. Nonrandom inactivation of a normal X-chromosome (extreme lyonization) may be the basis for the expression of hemophilia A in this female patient.     

Study of mutations in Jordanian patients with haemophilia A: identification of five novel mutations

Summary.  Haemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder caused by mutations in the factor VIII gene ( F8 ), which encodes factor VIII (FVIII) protein, a plasma glycoprotein, that plays an important role in the blood coagulation cascade. In the present study, our aim was to identify F8 gene mutations in HA patients from Jordan. One hundred and seventy-five HA patients from 42 unrelated families were included in this study. Among these patients, 117 (67%) had severe HA, 13 (7%) had moderate HA and 45 (26%) had mild HA. Severe patients were first tested for intron-22 inversion using long range polymerase chain reaction (PCR), then negative patients were tested for intron-1 inversion using PCR. Sequencing for the entire F8 gene was performed for all severe HA patients who were found negative for intron-22 and -1 inversions and it was also performed for moderate and mild HA patients. HA causative mutations were identified in all patients. Intron-22 and -1 inversions were detected in 52% and 2% of families respectively. Beside these two mutations, 19 different mutations were identified, which include 15 missense and four frameshift mutations. Five novel mutations were identified including one frameshift and four missense mutations. No large deletions or nonsense mutations were detected in patients who participated in this study. Only 17 patients with severe HA were found positive for FVIII inhibitors. The data presented will play an important role for genetic counselling and health care of HA patients in Jordan.     

The Canadian “National Program for hemophilia mutation testing” database: A ten‐year review

A reference genotyping laboratory was established in 2000 at Queen's University, Kingston, to provide genetic testing for Hemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) and create a Canadian mutation database. Canadian hemophilia treatment centers and genetics clinics provided DNA and clinical information from November 2000 to March 2011. The factor VIII (F8) gene was analyzed in 1,177 patients (47% of HA population) and 787 female family members and the factor IX (F9) gene in 267 patients (47% of HB population) and 123 female family members, using Southern Blot, PCR, conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis, and/or direct sequencing. The mutation detection rates for HA and HB were 91% and 94%, respectively. 380 different F8 mutations were identified: inversions of intron 22 and intron 1, 229 missense, 45 nonsense, eight deletions, 70 frameshifts, 25 splice site, and one compound mutation with a splice site and intron 1 inversion. Of these mutations, 228 were novel to the Hemophilia A Database (HADB, http://hadb.org.uk/ ). A total 125 different F9 mutations were identified: 80 missense, 12 frameshift, 12 splice site, nine nonsense and seven promoter mutations, three large deletions, and two compound mutations with both missense and nonsense changes. Of these mutations, 36 were novel to the International Haemophilia B Mutation database ( http://www.kcl.ac.uk/ip/petergreen/haemBdatabase.html ). The Canadian F8 and F9 mutation database reflects the allelic heterogeneity of HA and HB, and is similar to previously described populations. This report represents the largest and longest duration experience of a national hemophilia genotyping program documented, to date. Am. J. Hematol. 88:1030–1034, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.