Further evidence for selective difficulty of upward eye pursuit in juvenile monkeys: effects of optokinetic stimulation, static roll tilt, and active head movements

The smooth-pursuit system moves the eyes in space accurately to track slowly moving objects of interest despite visual inputs from the moving background and/or vestibular inputs during head movements. Recently, our laboratory has shown that young primates exhibit asymmetric eye movements during vertical pursuit across a textured background; upward eye velocity gain is reduced. To further understand the nature of this asymmetry, we performed three series of experiments in young monkeys. In Experiment 1, we examined whether this asymmetry was due to an un-compensated downward optokinetic reflex induced by the textured background as it moves across the retina in the opposite direction of the pursuit eye movements. For this, we examined the monkeys’ ability to fixate a stationary spot in space during movement of the textured background and compared it with vertical pursuit across the stationary textured background. We also examined gains of optokinetic eye movements induced by downward motion of the textured background during upward pursuit. In both task conditions, gains of downward eye velocity induced by the textured background were too small to explain reduced upward eye velocity gains. In Experiment 2, we examined whether the frame of reference for low-velocity, upward pursuit was orbital or earth vertical. To test this, we first applied static tilt in the roll plane until the animals were nearly positioned on their side in order to dissociate vertical or horizontal eye movements in the orbit from those in space. Deficits were observed for upward pursuit in the orbit but not in space. In Experiment 3, we tested whether asymmetry was observed during head-free pursuit that requires coordination between eye and head movements. Asymmetry in vertical eye velocity gains was still observed during head-free pursuit although it was not observed in vertical head velocity. These results, taken together, suggest that the asymmetric eye movements during vertical pursuit are specific for upward, primarily eye pursuit in the orbit.     

Directional asymmetry in vertical smooth-pursuit and cancellation of the vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex in juvenile monkeys

Young primates exhibit asymmetric eye movements during vertical smooth-pursuit across a textured background such that upward pursuit has low velocity and requires many catch-up saccades. The asymmetric eye movements cannot be explained by the un-suppressed optokinetic reflex resulting from background visual motion across the retina during pursuit, suggesting that the asymmetry reflects most probably, a low gain in upward eye commands (Kasahara et al. in Exp Brain Res 171:306–321, 2006). In this study, we examined (1) whether there are intrinsic differences in the upward and downward pursuit capabilities and (2) how the difficulty in upward pursuit is correlated with the ability of vertical VOR cancellation. Three juvenile macaques that had initially been trained only for horizontal (but not vertical) pursuit were trained for sinusoidal pursuit in the absence of a textured background. In 2 of the 3 macaques, there was a clear asymmetry between upward and downward pursuit gains and in the time course of initial gain increase. In the third macaque, downward pursuit gain was also low. It did not show consistent asymmetry during the initial 2 weeks of training. However, it also exhibited a significant asymmetry after 4 months of training, similar to the other two monkeys. After 6 months of training, these two monkeys (but not the third) still exhibited asymmetry. As target frequency increased in these two monkeys, mean upward eye velocity saturated at ∼15°/s, whereas horizontal and downward eye velocity increased up to ∼40°/s. During cancellation of the VOR induced by upward whole body rotation, downward eye velocity of the residual VOR increased as the stimulus frequency increased. Gain of the residual VOR during upward rotation was significantly higher than that during horizontal and downward rotation. The time course of residual VOR induced by vertical whole body step-rotation during VOR cancellation was predicted by addition of eye velocity during pursuit and VOR x1. These results support our view that the directional asymmetry reflects the difference in the organization of the cerebellar floccular region for upward and downward directions and the preeminent role of pursuit in VOR cancellation.     

Adaptive changes in smooth pursuit eye movements induced by cross-axis pursuit-vestibular interaction training in monkeys

The smooth pursuit system interacts with the vestibular system to maintain the accuracy of eye movements in space. To understand neural mechanisms of short-term modifications of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) induced by pursuit-vestibular interactions, we used a cross-axis procedure in trained monkeys. We showed earlier that pursuit training in the plane orthogonal to the rotation plane induces adaptive cross-axis VOR in complete darkness. To further study the properties of adaptive responses, we examined here the initial eye movements during tracking of a target while being rotated with a trapezoidal waveform (peak velocity 30 or 40°/s). Subjects were head-stabilized Japanese monkeys that were rewarded for accurate pursuit. Whole body rotation was applied either in the yaw or pitch plane while presenting a target moving in-phase with the chair with the same trajectory but in the orthogonal plane. Eye movements induced by equivalent chair rotation with or without the target were examined before and after training. Before training, chair rotation alone resulted only in the collinear VOR, and smooth eye movement-tracking of orthogonal target motion during rotation had a normal smooth pursuit latency (ca 100 ms). With training, the latency of orthogonal smooth tracking eye movements shortened, and the mean latency after 1 h of training was 42 ms with a mean gain, at 100 ms after stimulus onset, of 0.4. The cross-axis VOR induced by chair rotation in complete darkness had identical latencies with the orthogonal smooth tracking eye movements, but its gains were <0.2. After cross-axis pursuit training, target movement alone without chair rotation induced smooth pursuit eye movements with latencies ca 100 ms. Pursuit training alone for 1 h using the same trajectory but without chair rotation did not result in any clear change in pursuit latency (ca 100 ms) or initial eye velocity. When a new target velocity was presented during identical chair rotation after training, eye velocity was correspondingly modulated by just 80 ms after rotation onset, which was shorter than the expected latency of pursuit (ca 100 ms). These results indicate that adaptive changes were induced in the smooth pursuit system by pursuit-vestibular interaction training. We suggest that this training facilitates the response of pursuit-related neurons in the cortical smooth pursuit pathways to vestibular inputs in the orthogonal plane, thus enabling smooth eye movements to be executed with shorter latencies and larger eye velocities than in normal smooth pursuit driven only by visual feedback. Electronic Publication     

A non-visual mechanism for voluntary cancellation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex

Summary Squirrel monkeys were trained to cancel their vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) by fixating a visual target that was head stationary during passive vestibular stimulation. The monkeys were seated on a vestibular turntable, and their heads were restrained. A small visual target (0.2°) was projected from the vestibular turntable onto a tangent screen. The monkeys' ability to suppress their VOR by fixating a head stationary target while the turntable was moving was compared to their ability to pursue the target when it was moved in the same manner.Squirrel monkeys were better able to suppress their VOR when the turntable was moved at high velocities than they were able to pursue targets that were moving at high velocities. The gaze velocity gain during VOR cancellation began to decrease when the head velocity was above 80°/s, and was greater than 0.6 when the head velocity was above 150°/s. However, gaze velocity gain during smooth pursuit decreased significantly when the target velocity was greater than 60°/s, and was less than 0.4 when the target velocity was 150°/s or more.The latency of VOR suppression was significantly shorter than the latency of smooth pursuit while the monkey was cancelling its VOR. When an unpredictable step change in head acceleration was generated while the monkey was cancelling its VOR, the VOR evoked by the head acceleration step began to be suppressed shortly after the initiation of the step ( 30 ms). On the other hand, the latency of the smooth pursuit eye movement elicited when the visual target was accelerated in the same manner during VOR cancellation was 100 ms. The comparison between these two results suggests that the monkeys did not use visual information related to target motion to suppress their VOR at an early latency.The monkeys' ability to suppress the VOR evoked by an unexpected change in head acceleration depended on the size of the head acceleration step. The VOR evoked by unexpected step changes in head acceleration was progressively less suppressed at an early latency as the size of the acceleration step increased, and was not suppressed at an early latency when the step change in head acceleration was greater than 500°/s².During smooth pursuit eye movements, unexpected step changes in head acceleration evoked a VOR that was suppressed at an early latency ( 50 ms) if the head movement was in the same direction as the ongoing smooth pursuit eye movement. The amount of early VOR suppression increased as the pursuit eye velocity increased.We conclude that squirrel monkeys utilize a fast, non-visual mechanism for cancelling their VOR while they are fixating a visual target and their head is moving. This non-visual mechanism appears to be turned on when the head is moving and the monkey is fixating a head stationary target. The mechanism probably utilizes a voluntarily gated vestibular signal to cancel the signals in VOR pathways at the level of the extraocular motorneurons. Although the VOR cancellation mechanism is not capable of completely suppressing the VOR evoked by large unexpected changes in head acceleration, we suggest that it is capable of suppressing the VOR generated by most voluntary head movements during combined eye and head gaze pursuit and that the function of this gated VOR cancellation system is to extend the range and accuracy of eye-head tracking movements.     

Signals used to compute errors in monkey vestibuloocular reflex: possible role of flocculus

Adaptive changes were induced in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) of monkeys by oscillating them while they viewed the visual scene through optical devices ("spectacles") that required changes in the amplitude of eye movement during head turns. The "gain" of the VOR (eye velocity divided by head velocity) during sinusoidal oscillation in darkness underwent gradual changes that were appropriate to reduce the motion of images on the retina during the adapting procedures. Bilateral ablation of the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus caused a complete and enduring loss of the ability to undergo adaptive changes in the VOR. Partial lesions caused a substantial but incomplete loss of the adaptive capability. We conclude that the flocculus is necessary for adaptive changes in the monkey's VOR. Further experiments in normal animals determined the types of stimuli that were necessary and/or sufficient to cause changes in VOR gain. Full-field visual stimulation was not necessary to induce adaptive changes in the VOR. Monkeys tracked a small spot in conditions that elicited the same combination of eye and head movements seen during passive oscillation with spectacles. The gain of the VOR showed changes 50-70% as large as those produced by the same duration of oscillation with spectacles. Since the effective tracking conditions cause a consistent correlation of floccular output with vestibular inputs, these data are compatible with our previous suggestion that the flocculus may provide signals used by the central nervous system to compute errors in the gain of the VOR. Prolonged sinusoidal optokinetic stimulation with the head stationary caused only a slight increase in VOR gain. Left-right reversal of vision and eye movement during sinusoidal vestibular oscillation caused decreases in VOR gain. In rabbits, both of these stimulus conditions produced large increases in the gain of the VOR, which implied that eye velocity signals were used instead of vestibular inputs to compute errors in the VOR. Our different results argue that vestibular signals are necessary for computing errors in VOR gain in the monkey. The species difference may reflect the additional role that smooth pursuit eye movements play in stabilizing gaze during head turns in monkeys.     

The effects of estrogen and raloxifene treatment on the antioxidant enzymes and nitrite-nitrate levels in brain cortex of ovariectomized rats

The interaction of smooth pursuit eye movements, vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and optokinetic reflex (OKR) is still not well understood. We therefore measured in macaque monkeys horizontal eye movements using transient horizontal rotations of a visual target, of monkeys‘ heads and/or of an optokinetic background pattern (ten combinations; smoothed position ramps of 16°). With intermediate peak velocity of target motion (v_max=12.8 °/s), pursuit held the eyes rather well on target, almost independent of concurrent vestibular or optokinetic stimuli (pursuit gain, 0.73–0.91). With v_max=1.6 °/s, in contrast, pursuit gain became strongly modified by the optokinetic stimulus. With v_max=51.2 °/s, pursuit gain became modified by vestibular stimulation. Although not intuitive, the experimental data can be explained by linear interaction (summation) of the neural driving signals for pursuit, VOR and OKR, as ascertained by simulations of a dynamic model.     

The initial vestibulo-ocular reflex and its visual enhancement and cancellation in humans

The gain (ratio of eye velocity to head velocity) of the initial horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) was calculated in 12 normal subjects over 350 ms during impulsive, unpredictable whole body rotation under three conditions: (1) darkness; (2) visual enhancement of the VOR, while the subjects fixated a stationary target; and (3) visual cancellation of the reflex, while subjects fixated a target that rotated with the head. The gain of the initial 80 ms of compensatory eye movement increased significantly during visual fixation in 5 subjects and decreased during attempted VOR cancellation in 3 subjects, when compared with VOR gain in darkness. Compensatory vestibular smooth eye movements were slowed, becoming curved at the onset of VOR cancellation, at mean latencies ranging from 78 to 149 ms in individual subjects (group mean 128 ms). At about 190 ms, quick phases moved the eyes in the same direction as head and target motion. The subsequent vestibular eye movements were about 50% slower than the initial smooth eye movements, indicating more effective cancellation. Visual enhancement of the VOR can occur prior to the onset of pursuit, providing evidence that fixation and smooth pursuit are distinct ocular motor systems. Visual cancellation of the VOR also begins prior to smooth pursuit initiation and becomes more effective after the latency of smooth pursuit.     

Visual tracking in monkeys: evidence for short-latency suppression of the vestibuloocular reflex

1. Monkeys normally use a combination of smooth head and eye movements to keep the eyes pointed at a slowly moving object. The visual inputs from target motion evoke smooth pursuit eye movements, whereas the vestibular inputs from head motion evoke a vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). Our study asks how the eye movements of pursuit and the VOR interact. Is there a linear addition of independent commands for pursuit and the VOR? Or does the interaction of visual and vestibular stimuli cause momentary, "parametric" modulation of transmission through VOR pathways? 2. We probed for the state of the VOR and pursuit by presenting transient perturbations of target and/or head motion under different steady-state tracking conditions. Tracking conditions included fixation at straight-ahead gaze, in which both the head and the target were stationary; "times-zero (X0) tracking," in which the target and head moved in the same direction at the same speed; and "times-two (X2) tracking," in which the target and head moved in opposite directions at the same speed. 3. Comparison of the eye velocities evoked by changes in the direction of X0 versus X2 tracking revealed two components of the tracking response. The earliest component, which we attribute to the VOR, had a latency of 14 ms and a trajectory that did not depend on initial tracking conditions. The later component had a latency of 70 ms or less and a trajectory that did depend on tracking conditions. 4. To probe the latency of pursuit eye movements, we imposed perturbations of target velocity imposed during X0 and X2 tracking. The resulting changes in eye velocity had latencies of at least 100 ms. We conclude that the effects of initial tracking conditions on eye velocity at latencies of less than 70 ms cannot be caused by visual feedback through the smooth-pursuit system. Instead, there must be another mechanism for short-latency control over the VOR; we call this component of the response "short-latency tracking." 5. Perturbations of head velocity or head and target velocity during X0 and X2 tracking showed that short-latency tracking depended only on the tracking conditions at the time the perturbation was imposed. The VOR appeared to be suppressed when the initial conditions were X0 tracking. 6. The magnitude of short-latency tracking depended on the speed of initial head and target movement. During X0 tracking at 15 deg/s, short-latency tracking was modest. When the initial speed of head and target motion was 60 deg/s, the amplitude of short-latency tracking was quite large and its latency became as short as 36 ms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Neuron activity in monkey vestibular nuclei during vertical vestibular stimulation and eye movements

To elucidate how information is processed in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) pathways subserving vertical eye movements, extracellular single-unit recordings were obtained from the vestibular nuclei of alert monkeys trained to track a visual target with their eyes while undergoing sinusoidal pitch oscillations (0.2-1.0 Hz). Units with activity related to vertical vestibular stimulation and/or eye movements were classified as either vestibular units (n = 53), vestibular plus eye-position units (n = 30), pursuit units (n = 10), or miscellaneous units (n = 5), which had various combinations of head- and eye-movement sensitivities. Vestibular units discharged in relation to head rotation, but not to smooth eye movements. On average, these units fired approximately in phase with head velocity; however, a broad range of phase shifts was observed. The activities of 8% of the vestibular units were related to saccades. Vestibular plus eye-position units fired in relation to head velocity and eye position and, in addition, usually to eye velocity. Their discharge rates increased for eye and head movements in opposite directions. During combined head and eye movements, the modulation in unit activity was not significantly different from the sum of the modulations during each alone. For saccades, the unit firing rate either decreased to zero or was unaffected. Pursuit units discharged in relation to eye position, eye velocity, or both, but not to head movements alone. For saccades, unit activity usually either paused or was unaffected. The eye-movement-related activities of the vestibular plus eye-position and pursuit units were not significantly different. A quantitative comparison of their firing patterns suggests that vestibular, vestibular plus eye-position, and pursuit neurons in the vestibular nucleus could provide mossy fiber inputs to the flocculus. In addition, the vertical vestibular plus eye-position neurons have discharge patterns similar to those of fibers recorded rostrally in the medial longitudinal fasciculus. Therefore, our data support the view that vertical vestibular plus eye-position neurons are interneurons of the VOR.     

Role of the cerebellar flocculus region in cancellation of the VOR during passive whole body rotation

A series of studies were carried out to investigate the role of the cerebellar flocculus and ventral paraflocculus in the ability to voluntarily cancel the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). Squirrel monkeys were trained to pursue moving visual targets and to fixate a head stationary or earth stationary target during passive whole body rotation (WBR). The firing behavior of 187 horizontal eye movement-related Purkinje (Pk) cells in the flocculus region was recorded during smooth pursuit eye movements and during WBR. Half of the Pk cells encountered were eye velocity Pk cells whose firing rates were related to eye movements during smooth pursuit and WBR. Their sensitivity to eye velocity during WBR was reduced when a visual target was not present, and their response to unpredictable steps in WBR was delayed by 80-100 ms, which suggests that eye movement sensitivity depended on visual feedback. They were insensitive to WBR when the VOR was canceled. The other half of the Purkinje cells encountered were sensitive to eye velocity during pursuit and to head velocity during VOR cancellation. They resembled the gaze velocity Pk cells previously described in rhesus monkeys. The head velocity signal tended to be less than half as large as the eye velocity-related signal and was observable at a short ( approximately 40 ms) latency when the head was unpredictably accelerated during ongoing VOR cancellation. Gaze and eye velocity type Pk cells were found to be intermixed throughout the ventral paraflocculus and flocculus. Most gaze velocity Pk cells (76%) were sensitive to ipsilateral eye and head velocity, but nearly half (48%) of the eye velocity Pk cells were sensitive to contralateral eye velocity. Thus the output of flocculus region is modified in two ways during cancellation of the VOR. Signals related to both ipsilateral and contralateral eye velocity are removed, and in approximately half of the cells a relatively weak head velocity signal is added. Unilateral injections of muscimol into the flocculus region had little effect on the gain of the VOR evoked either in the presence or absence of visual targets. However, ocular pursuit velocity and the ability to suppress the VOR by fixating a head stationary target were reduced by approximately 50%. These observations suggest that the flocculus region is an essential part of the neural substrate for both visual feedback-dependent and nonvisual mechanisms for canceling the VOR during passive head movements.     

Otolith inputs to pursuit neurons in the frontal eye fields of alert monkeys

The smooth-pursuit system must interact with the vestibular system to maintain the accuracy of eye movements in space during head movement. Maintenance of a target image on the foveae is required not only during head rotation which activates primarily semi-circular canals but also during head translation which activates otolith organs. The caudal part of the frontal eye fields (FEF) contains pursuit neurons. The majority of them receive vestibular inputs induced by whole body rotation. However, it has not been tested whether FEF pursuit neurons receive otolith inputs. In the present study, we first classified FEF pursuit neurons as belonging to one of three groups (vergence + fronto-parallel pursuit, vergence only, fronto-parallel pursuit only) based on their responses during fronto-parallel pursuit and mid-sagittal vergence-pursuit. We, then, tested discharge modulation of these neurons during fore/aft and/or right/left translation by passively moving the whole body sinusoidally at 0.33 Hz (±10 cm, peak velocity 19 cm/s; 0.04g). The majority of FEF pursuit neurons in all three groups were activated by fore/aft and right/left translation without a target in complete darkness. There was no correlation between the magnitude of discharge modulation and translational vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). Preferred directions of translational responses were distributed nearly evenly in front of the monkeys. Discharge modulation was also observed when a target moved together with whole body, requiring the monkeys to cancel the translational VOR. These results indicate that the discharge modulation of FEF pursuit neurons during whole body translation reflected otolith inputs.     

Vertical Purkinje cells of the monkey floccular lobe: simple-spike activity during pursuit and passive whole body rotation.

To understand how the simian floccular lobe is involved in vertical smooth pursuit eye movements and the vertical vestibuloocular reflex (VOR), we examined simple-spike activity of 70 Purkinje (P) cells during pursuit eye movements and passive whole body rotation. Fifty-eight cells responded during vertical and 12 during horizontal pursuit. We classified P cells as vertical gaze velocity (VG) if their modulation occurred for movements of both the eye (during vertical pursuit) and head (during pitch VOR suppression) with the modulation during one less than twice that of the other and was less during the target-fixed-in-space condition (pitch VOR X1) than during pitch VOR suppression. VG P cells constituted only a minority of vertical P cells (19%). Other vertical P cells that responded during pitch VOR suppression were classified as vertical eye and head velocity (V/) P cells (48%), regardless of the synergy of their response direction during smooth pursuit and VOR suppression. Vertical P cells that did not respond during pitch VOR suppression but did respond during rotation in vertical planes other than pitch were classified as off-pitch V/ P cells (33%). The mean eye-velocity and eye-position sensitivities of the three types of vertical P cells were similar. One-third (2/7 VG, 2/11 V/, 6/13 off-pitch V/), in addition, showed eye position sensitivity during saccade-free fixations. Maximal vestibular activation directions (MADs) were examined during VOR suppression by applying vertical whole body rotation with the monkeys oriented in different vertical planes. The MADs for VG P cells and V/ P cells with eye and vestibular sensitivity in the same direction were distributed near the pitch plane, suggesting convergence of bilateral anterior canal inputs. In contrast, MADs of off-pitch V/ P cells and V/ P cells with oppositely directed eye and vestibular sensitivity were shifted toward the roll plane, suggesting convergence of anterior and posterior canal inputs of the same side. Unlike horizontal G P cells, the modulation of many VG and V/ P cells when the target was fixed in space (pitch VOR X1) was not well predicted by the linear addition of their modulations during vertical pursuit and pitch VOR suppression. These results indicate that the populations of vertical and horizontal eye-movement P cells in the floccular lobe have markedly different discharge properties and therefore may be involved in different kinds of processing of vestibular-oculomotor interactions.     

Latency of vestibular responses of pursuit neurons in the caudal frontal eye fields to whole body rotation

The smooth pursuit system and the vestibular system interact to keep the retinal target image on the fovea by matching the eye velocity in space to target velocity during head and/or whole body movement. The caudal part of the frontal eye fields (FEF) in the fundus of the arcuate sulcus contains pursuit-related neurons and the majority of them respond to vestibular stimulation induced by whole body movement. To understand the role of FEF pursuit neurons in the interaction of vestibular and pursuit signals, we examined the latency and time course of discharge modulation to horizontal whole body rotation during different vestibular task conditions in head-stabilized monkeys. Pursuit neurons with horizontal preferred directions were selected, and they were classified either as gaze-velocity neurons or eye/head-velocity neurons based on the previous criteria. Responses of these neurons to whole body step-rotation at 20 degrees/s were examined during cancellation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), VOR x1, and during chair steps in complete darkness without a target (VORd). The majority of pursuit neurons tested (approximately 70%) responded during VORd with latencies <80 ms. These initial responses were basically similar in the three vestibular task conditions. The shortest latency was 20 ms and the modal value was 24 ms. These responses were also similar between gaze-velocity neurons and eye/head-velocity neurons, indicating that the initial responses (<80 ms) were vestibular responses induced by semicircular canal inputs. During VOR cancellation and x1, discharge of the two groups of neurons diverged at approximately 90 ms following the onset of chair rotation, consistent with the latencies associated with smooth pursuit. The shortest latency to the onset of target motion during smooth pursuit was 80 ms and the modal value was 95 ms. The time course of discharge rate difference of the two groups of neurons between VOR cancellation and x1 was predicted by the discharge modulation associated with smooth pursuit. These results provide further support for the involvement of the caudal FEF in integration of vestibular inputs and pursuit signals.     

Gravity and the vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex

Summary We studied the vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and vertical visual-vestibular interaction induced by voluntary pitch in the upright and onside positions in eight normal human subjects. Subjects were trained to produce sinusoidal (0.4 to 1.6 Hz) pitch head movements guided by a frequency modulated sound signal. Eye and head movements were recorded with a magnetic search coil. There was no significant difference between the pooled average gain (eye velocity/head velocity) of the vertical VOR in the upright and onside positions. Vertical VOR gain in any position could be more or less than 1.0 for individual subjects. By contrast, gain with an earth-fixed visual target was always near 1.0. Asymmetries in the gain of upward and downward VOR, pursuit and fixation suppression of the VOR were found in individual subjects, but in the group of normal subjects there was no significant difference between gain of up and down eye movements induced by vestibular, visual or visual-vestibular stimulation in any position. We conclude that during voluntary pitch otolith signals are not critical for normal functioning of the vertical VOR.     

Role of the cerebellar flocculus region in the coordination of eye and head movements during gaze pursuit

The contribution of the flocculus region of the cerebellum to horizontal gaze pursuit was studied in squirrel monkeys. When the head was free to move, the monkeys pursued targets with a combination of smooth eye and head movements; with the majority of the gaze velocity produced by smooth tracking head movements. In the accompanying study we reported that the flocculus region was necessary for cancellation of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) evoked by passive whole body rotation. The question addressed in this study was whether the flocculus region of the cerebellum also plays a role in canceling the VOR produced by active head movements during gaze pursuit. The firing behavior of 121 Purkinje (Pk) cells that were sensitive to horizontal smooth pursuit eye movements was studied. The sample included 66 eye velocity Pk cells and 55 gaze velocity Pk cells. All of the cells remained sensitive to smooth pursuit eye movements during combined eye and head tracking. Eye velocity Pk cells were insensitive to smooth pursuit head movements. Gaze velocity Pk cells were nearly as sensitive to active smooth pursuit head movements as they were passive whole body rotation; but they were less than half as sensitive ( approximately 43%) to smooth pursuit head movements as they were to smooth pursuit eye movements. Considered as a whole, the Pk cells in the flocculus region of the cerebellar cortex were <20% as sensitive to smooth pursuit head movements as they were to smooth pursuit eye movements, which suggests that this region does not produce signals sufficient to cancel the VOR during smooth head tracking. The comparative effect of injections of muscimol into the flocculus region on smooth pursuit eye and head movements was studied in two monkeys. Muscimol inactivation of the flocculus region profoundly affected smooth pursuit eye movements but had little effect on smooth pursuit head movements or on smooth tracking of visual targets when the head was free to move. We conclude that the signals produced by flocculus region Pk cells are neither necessary nor sufficient to cancel the VOR during gaze pursuit.     

Discharge of pursuit neurons in the caudal part of the frontal eye fields during cross-axis vestibular-pursuit training in monkeys

Previous studies in monkeys have shown that pursuit training during orthogonal whole body rotation results in task-dependent, predictive pursuit eye movements. We examined whether pursuit neurons in the frontal eye fields (FEF) are involved in predictive pursuit induced by vestibular-pursuit training. Two monkeys were rotated horizontally at 20°/s for 0.5 s either rightward or leftward with random inter-trial intervals. This chair motion trajectory was synchronized with orthogonal target motion at 20°/s for 0.5 s either upward or downward. Monkeys were rewarded for pursuing the target. Vertical pursuit eye velocities and discharge of 23 vertical pursuit neurons to vertical target motion were compared before training and during the last 5 min of the 25–45 min training. The latencies of discharge modulation of 61% of the neurons (14/23) shortened after vestibular-pursuit training in association with a shortening of pursuit latency. However, their discharge modulation occurred after 100 ms following the onset of pursuit eye velocity. Only four neurons (4/23 = 17%) discharged before the eye movement onset. A significant change was not observed in eye velocity and FEF pursuit neuron discharge during pursuit alone after training without vestibular stimulation. Vestibular stimulation alone without a target after training induced no clear response. These results suggest that the adaptive change in response to pursuit prediction was induced by vestibular inputs in the presence of target pursuit. FEF pursuit neurons are unlikely to be involved in the initial stage of generating predictive eye movements. We suggest that they may participate in the maintenance of predictive pursuit.     

Response properties of dorsolateral pontine units during smooth pursuit in the rhesus macaque

1. The anatomical connections of the dorsolateral pontine nucleus (DLPN) implicate it in the production of smooth-pursuit eye movements. It receives inputs from cortical structures believed to be involved in visual motion processing (middle temporal cortex) or motion execution (posterior parietal cortex) and projects to the flocculus of the cerebellum, which is involved in smooth pursuit. To determine the role of the DLPN in smooth pursuit, we have studied the discharge patterns of 191 DLPN neurons in five monkeys trained to make smooth-pursuit eye movements of a spot moving either across a patterned background or in darkness. 2. Four unit types could be distinguished. Visual units (15%) discharged in response to movement of a large textured pattern, often in a direction-selective fashion but not during smooth pursuit of a spot in the dark. Eye movement neurons (31%) discharged during sinusoidal smooth pursuit in the dark with peak discharge rate either at peak eye position or peak eye velocity, but they showed no response during background movement or during other visual stimulation. These units continued to discharge when the target was extinguished (blanked) briefly, and the monkey continued to make smooth eye movements in the dark. The majority (54%) of our DLPN units discharged during both smooth pursuit in the dark and background movement while the monkey fixated. Blanking the target during smooth pursuit revealed that these units fell into two distinct classes. Visual pursuit units ceased discharging during a blank, suggesting that they had only a visual sensitivity. Pursuit and visual units continued to discharge during the blank, indicating that they had a combined oculomotor and visual sensitivity. 3. Ninety-five percent of the units that discharged during smooth pursuit were direction selective. These units had rather broad directional tuning curves with widths at half height ranging from 65 to 180 degrees. Many preferred directions for DLPN units were observed, although the vertical and near-vertical directions predominated. 4. Most units that responded to large-field background movement were direction selective. During sinusoidal movement of a large-field background, half of them also discharged in relation to stimulus velocity, whereas others did not.     

The influence of stationary and moving textured backgrounds on smooth-pursuit initiation and steady state pursuit in humans

 We investigated the effects of stationary and moving textured backgrounds on the initiation and steady state of ocular pursuit using horizontally moving targets. We found that the initial eye acceleration was slightly reduced when a stationary textured background was employed, as compared to experiments with a homogeneous background. When a moving textured background was introduced, the initial eye acceleration was significantly larger when the target and the background moved in opposite directions than when the target and the background moved in the same direction. The use of stationary and moving textured backgrounds resulted in comparable effects on the initial eye acceleration when they were presented either as a large field or as a narrow, horizontal small field, only covering the trajectory of the target. Moreover, small-field stationary backgrounds slightly reduced the eye velocity during steady state pursuit. A small-field background moving in the opposite direction to the target distinctly reduced eye velocity, while a target and a background moving in the same direction sometimes even improved pursuit performance, when compared with a homogeneous background. The influences of small-field textured backgrounds on steady state pursuit were comparable with those of large-field backgrounds in both stationary and moving conditions. Received: 14 December 1996 / Accepted: 30 December 1996     

Contribution of the cerebellar flocculus to gaze control during active head movements.

The flocculus and ventral paraflocculus are adjacent regions of the cerebellar cortex that are essential for controlling smooth pursuit eye movements and for altering the performance of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). The question addressed in this study is whether these regions of the cerebellum are more globally involved in controlling gaze, regardless of whether eye or active head movements are used to pursue moving visual targets. Single-unit recordings were obtained from Purkinje (Pk) cells in the floccular region of squirrel monkeys that were trained to fixate and pursue small visual targets. Cell firing rate was recorded during smooth pursuit eye movements, cancellation of the VOR, combined eye-head pursuit, and spontaneous gaze shifts in the absence of targets. Pk cells were found to be much less sensitive to gaze velocity during combined eye-head pursuit than during ocular pursuit. They were not sensitive to gaze or head velocity during gaze saccades. Temporary inactivation of the floccular region by muscimol injection compromised ocular pursuit but had little effect on the ability of monkeys to pursue visual targets with head movements or to cancel the VOR during active head movements. Thus the signals produced by Pk cells in the floccular region are necessary for controlling smooth pursuit eye movements but not for coordinating gaze during active head movements. The results imply that individual functional modules in the cerebellar cortex are less involved in the global organization and coordination of movements than with parametric control of movements produced by a specific part of the body.     

Enhancement of the vestibulo-ocular reflex by prior eye movements.

We investigated the effect of visually mediated eye movements made before velocity-step horizontal head rotations in eleven normal human subjects. When subjects viewed a stationary target before and during head rotation, gaze velocity was initially perturbed by approximately 20% of head velocity; gaze velocity subsequently declined to zero within approximately 300 ms of the stimulus onset. We used a curve-fitting procedure to estimate the dynamic course of the gain throughout the compensatory response to head rotation. This analysis indicated that the median initial gain of compensatory eye movements (mainly because of the vestibulo-ocular reflex, VOR) was 0. 8 and subsequently increased to 1.0 after a median interval of 320 ms. When subjects attempted to fixate the remembered location of the target in darkness, the initial perturbation of gaze was similar to during fixation of a visible target (median initial VOR gain 0.8); however, the period during which the gain increased toward 1.0 was >10 times longer than that during visual fixation. When subjects performed horizontal smooth-pursuit eye movements that ended (i.e., 0 gaze velocity) just before the head rotation, the gaze velocity perturbation at the onset of head rotation was absent or small. The initial gain of the VOR had been significantly increased by the prior pursuit movements for all subjects (P < 0.05; mean increase of 11%). In four subjects, we determined that horizontal saccades and smooth tracking of a head-fixed target (VOR cancellation with eye stationary in the orbit) also increased the initial VOR gain (by a mean of 13%) during subsequent head rotations. However, after vertical saccades or smooth pursuit, the initial gaze perturbation caused by a horizontal head rotation was similar to that which occurred after fixation of a stationary target. We conclude that the initial gain of the VOR during a sudden horizontal head rotation is increased by prior horizontal, but not vertical, visually mediated gaze shifts. We postulate that this "priming" effect of a prior gaze shift on the gain of the VOR occurs at the level of the velocity inputs to the neural integrator subserving horizontal eye movements, where gaze-shifting commands and vestibular signals converge.