Characteristics of Patients Seeking Care from Independent Dental Hygienist Practices

Objectives : This study determined demographic characteristics, satisfaction with care, and likelihood of follow-up dentist visits for patients seen in office-based, independent, dental hygienist practices. Methods : New patients were surveyed after their initial visits to independent hygienist practices to assess their demographic characteristics and satisfaction with care at both the beginning of practice operations and 18 months after the start of these practices. Follow-up surveys were sent to patients 12 and 24 months after their initial visits to the independently practicing dental hygienists to determine if patients had visited a dentist. Results : Most respondents were white, female, had attended some college, and reported high family incomes. Ninety-eight percent of respondents were satisfied with their dental hygiene care. Follow-up questionnaires revealed that over 80 percent of respondents visited the dentist within 12 months of receiving dental hygiene care in independent settings. This level of follow-up care with dentists was found both for respondents who reported having a regular dentist at their initial visits with the hygienists and for those who reported not having a regular dentist. Conclusion : Independent practice by dental hygienists provided access to dental hygiene care and encouraged visits to the dentist.     

Dental Care for Pregnant Women

BackgroundThe authors conducted a study to examine factors associated with general dentists' provision of care for pregnant women and the extent to which they provide comprehensive dental care.MethodsThe authors mailed an 86-item questionnaire to 1,000 practicing general dentists in North Carolina. Survey domains included provider knowledge about pregnancy and dental health, dental treatment practices, barriers to providing care, outcome expectancy, and personal and practice demographics. The primary dependent variables the authors analyzed were whether dentists provided any treatment to pregnant women and, among those who did, the extent to which they provided comprehensive services. The authors performed multivariate regression analyses to determine factors associated with dentists' provision of care to pregnant women (P < .05).ResultsA total of 513 surveys were returned (a response rate of 51.3 percent), of which 495 surveys had complete responses. The authors included the completed surveys in their analyses. The mean age of the respondents was 46 years. The results of multivariate analysis showed that respondents who perceived a lack of demand for services among pregnant women and provided preconception counseling were less likely to provide any treatment for pregnant patients than were those who perceived a demand for services and who did not provide preconception counseling, respectively. Dentists who were male, had a low knowledge score, provided preconception counseling and treated largely white populations of patients were less likely than female dentists, those who had moderate or high knowledge scores, and those who treated a population of minority patients to provide comprehensive care for pregnant women.ConclusionsMost general dentists in private practice provide care for pregnant women, but the authors found notable gaps in dental provider knowledge and comprehensive dental services available for pregnant women.Clinical ImplicationsAlthough many general dentists provide some dental care to pregnant women, more should be done to ensure that this care is comprehensive.     

Dental Hygienists in Nontraditional Settings: Practice and Patient Characteristics

The dental hygienist's role in the treatment of special populations in nontraditional settings is an important one. Little is known about the hygienist's practice characteristics in these settings, nor about the patients receiving care. To gain needed information, a representative sample of the entire population of licensed hygienists in the United States was screened (n = 38,380). This screening identified 1,205 hygienists practicing in nontraditional settings. These hygienists were sent comprehensive questionnaires examining practice and patient characteristics. Completed questionnaires were returned by 1,016 (84.3%) hygienists. This report describes reported hygiene practice characteristics; hygienist interactions with patients and providers; and patient characteristics, including age, medical/emotional/social conditions, and dental treatment needs. Major findings of respondents' reports reveal that: approximately 90 percent of patients were in need of dental/dental hygiene services with approximately one in four requiring only dental hygiene services; the dental hygienists perceived a high level of acceptance of their role by patients and providers; the majority of patients treated were categorized as generally medically healthy (65.7%); and the clinical practice of dental hygiene in nontraditional settings mirrors that of private practice.     

Differences in Characteristics of California Dentists Who Employ Dental Hygienists and Those Who Do Not

BackgroundDental hygienists can increase dentists’ productivity, yet nationwide, one-third of dentists do not employ a hygienist. The profession needs more information on the characteristics of these dentists and their reasons for not employing hygienists.MethodsThe author used a 2003 survey of California dentists and a logistic regression analysis to assess factors independently associated with dentists’ employment of hygienists. These factors included dentists’ personal, practice, population, productivity and patient care characteristics. She also assessed characteristics of dentists who did not employ hygienists and their reasons for not doing so.ResultsDentists who worked full time, employed more administrative personnel, had more operatories, had longer appointments, had more income from private payers and had more elderly patients were more likely to employ hygienists than were dentists with alternative characteristics. Graduates of dental schools outside the United States and those with fewer white patients were less likely to employ hygienists. Reasons for not employing hygienists included personal choice, high costs and not having a sufficient volume of work.ConclusionsThe author's findings suggested that in employing hygienists, dentists consider preferences, practice income and patient demand, among other factors. Further examination of reasons for employing hygienists is warranted.Practice ImplicationsHiring a hygienist increases a dental practice's patient capacity, yet not all dentists can or choose to do so. Policies aimed at increasing dental workforce capacity must take into account dentists’ characteristics and preferences.     

Service mix in general dental practices employing and not employing dental hygienists

Abstract Service mix studies conducted in Australia have indicated a low provision of periodontal services. The service mix in Australian general dental practices employing dental hygienists has not been studied. This study compares the service mix between 18 practices employing hygienists and 29 practices not employing hygienists in Adelaide. Practices employing hygienists tended to be larger group practices, with younger dentists seeing a younger set of patients. Practices employing dental hygienists provided a mean of 97.9 services to 57.2 patients over 2 days, significantly higher than the mean of 68.8 procedures to 39.1 patients in practices not employing dental hygienists. Comparing the % of procedures provided in treatment categories as a ratio of total procedures, practices employing dental hygienists provided significantly more periodontal procedures and less oral surgery, prosthetic and restorative procedures. Periodontally-related services accounted for an average of 37.7% of procedures in practices employing dental hygienists compared with 18.9% in practices not employing dental hygienists (p(0.05). Periodontal and preventive treatment of 50.7%) of patients in practices employing hygienists was delegated to a hygienist, and the level of delegation of periodontally-related procedures was 77.2%. Over 90% of procedures performed by hygienists were periodontally-related, with the removal of subgingival calculus accounting for 57.7% of all procedures provided by dental hygienists. In conclusion, practices employing hygienists had a more periodontally-orientated service mix, with hygienists acting to complement the services of dentists in the provision of periodontal services, rather than as a substitute for the dentist.     

Attitudes of two groups of dentists towards dental hygienists

The purpose of the study was to assess whether cooperation with a dental hygienist was based on pursuit of financial gain or on aspirations to improve patient care. To this end a questionnaire was sent to 972 dentists. 412 dentists replied, of whom 178 had patients treated by a dental hygienist. Questions were asked regarding practice profile, preventive orientation and dentists' opinion about the material and immaterial value of cooperation with a dental hygienist. Discriminant analysis showed that the main distinguishing factor between dentists who did and dentists who did not cooperate with dental hygienists was their opinion about the quality of the dental hygienists' work in relation to the non-financial costs for patients, insurance companies, and dentists. The difference in the dentists' opinions about the direct profitability of dental hygienists was not significant. The conclusion can be drawn that the orientation of Dutch dentists towards care for their patients plays a more important role in a dentist's decision to cooperate with a dental hygienist than is usually presumed.     

Attitudes among dentists and dental hygienists towards extended scope and independent practice of dental hygienists

Aims: Attitudes of dentists and dental hygienists towards extended scope and independent dental hygiene practice are described in several studies, but the results are heterogenous. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the attitudes of dentists and dental hygienists towards extended scope and independent dental hygiene practice. Methods: PubMed, AMED and CINAHL were screened by two independent assessors to identify relevant studies. Only quantitative studies that reported the percentages of dentists'' and dental hygienists'' attitude towards extended scope and independent dental hygiene practice were included. The random-effects model was used to synthesise possible heterogenous influences. Results: Meta proportions with regard to a positive attitude towards extended scope of practice are 0.54 for dentists and 0.81 for dental hygienists. Meta proportions of a positive attitude towards independent practice are 0.14 for dentists and 0.59 for dental hygienists. A meta analysis with regard to negative attitudes could only be performed on extended scope of practice and did not reveal a difference between the two professions. We obtained homogeneous outcomes of the studies included regarding negative attitudes of dentists . A minority of dentists hold negative attitudes towards extended scope of dental hygiene practice. Study outcomes regarding negative attitudes of dental hygienists were heterogeneous. Conclusions: Positive attitudes are present among a majority of dentists and dental hygienists with regard to extended scope of dental hygiene practice, while for independent dental hygiene practice this holds for a minority of dentists and a majority of dental hygienists.Key words: Dental practice, general dental practice, hygienist, oral health policy, primary oral health care     

Improving oral health in Pakistan using dental hygienists

This paper reviews the healthcare system, available dental care, and oral health status of people in Pakistan. Considering the enormous unmet oral health needs, the insufficient supply of dental professionals and the current unstructured dental hygiene curriculum in Pakistan, a mission, vision, and goals for professional dental hygiene in Pakistan is recommended. The authors offer recommendations for competency-based dental hygiene education and practice, professional credentialing, a practice act, and a dental hygiene scope of practice to promote the health, welfare, and quality of life of the Pakistani people. Specifically, the authors recommend increasing the number of quality dental hygiene programs, establishing the dental hygienist as a primary care provider of oral health services, enhancing current dental hygiene curriculum, and establishing a dental hygiene council with responsibility for educational requirements and regulation of dental hygienists in Pakistan.     

Independent dental hygiene practice worldwide: a report of two meetings

Objectives: Following a meeting at the EUROPERIO in Berlin in 2003, a forum on Independent Practice of Dental Hygienists was held at the International Symposium on Dental Hygiene (ISDH) in Madrid July, 2004. The forum was organized and moderated by Beate Gatermann, President of the German Dental Hygiene Association. The participants were asked to address the following issues: population of country/state; population of dentists; population of state recognized dental hygienists (Canada/USA etc.); number of hygienists with ‘Diploma’ (Europe); duration of dental hygiene education; cost of education (2/3 year base approximately); when and how independent practice began in the country and who must be consulted or approve the application for an independent office (e.g. Health Department); what services are allowed? Can dental hygienists administer local anaesthesia in the dental office, and if so, must a dentist be present? Can dental hygienists purchase the necessary medication for the injection? Does the dental hygienist require additional education to provide local anaesthesia? How are the patients charged? Does the country offer a service fee list? Do insurance companies pay claims of the dental hygienist? What is the approximate average fee per hour charged (€/$)? Do dentists refer patients to you? If so, do they need a letter of referral? Are dental hygienists allowed to take radiographs in independent dental hygiene offices?     

Is there a shortage of dental hygienists?

Dental hygiene faculty from the Ohio State University, working under a grant from the Ohio Dental Association, surveyed licensed dentists and dental hygienists in Ohio in order to determine work-related concerns and possible solutions to perceived shortages of hygienists. There were 585 respondents from those selected through stratified systematic sampling based on state dental district for a 69% rate of dentist return and a 73% rate of hygienist return. The joint surveys assessed attitudes and documented experiences in several categories: practice background, opinion about hygiene employment shortage, compensation, aspects of hygiene satisfaction, reasons for ever terminating hygiene practice and future conditions persuading a return to hygiene practice. This article, the first in a series, presents findings from the survey of dentists relative to a perceived shortage of clinical dental hygienists. Forty-eight percent of dentist respondents believe that there is a shortage, while 52% are either not sure or believe there is no shortage. Those sensing a shortage have either tried to find a hygienist and could not believe there is a smaller pool to choose from, or have heard that colleagues have been unable to find a hygienist. Solutions to the shortage focus on better recruitment of qualified students, encouraging reentry of non-practicing hygienists, and promoting retention of hygienists in existing practices. Less frequently, dentists suggest starting new hygiene programs or training hygienists by preceptorship.     

Dental hygiene in Slovakia

This article reports on the development of the dental hygiene profession in Slovakia from a global perspective. The aim is to inform about current developments and to examine, how access to qualified dental hygiene care might be improved and how professional challenges might be met. For an international study on dental hygiene, secondary source data were obtained from members of the House of Delegates of the International Federation of Dental Hygienists (IFDH) or by fax and e-mail from experts involved in the national professional and educational organization of dental hygiene in non-IFDH member countries, such as Slovakia. Responses were followed-up by interviews, e-mail correspondence, visits to international universities, and a review of supporting studies and reference literature. Results show that the introduction of dental hygiene in Slovakia in 1992 was inspired by the delivery of preventive care in Switzerland. Initiating local dentists and dental hygienists strive to attain a high educational level, equitable to that of countries in which dental hygiene has an established tradition of high quality care. Low access to qualified dental hygiene care may be a result of insufficient funding for preventive services, social and cultural lack of awareness of the benefits of preventive care, and of limitations inherent in the legal constraints preventing unsupervised dental hygiene practice. These may be a result of gender politics affecting a female-dominated profession and of a perception that dental hygiene is auxiliary to dental care. International comparison show that of all Eastern European countries, the dental hygiene profession appears most advanced in Slovakia. This is expressed in high evidence-based academic goals, in extensive work with international consultants from the Netherlands and Switzerland, in annual congresses of high professional quality, and in the establishment of a profession, which has not been introduced in all Western EU countries.     

Role of the dental hygienist in the prosthodontic practice

Prosthodontic practices can benefit from the inclusion of a dental hygienist on the dental team. The dental hygienist can successfully complete procedures traditionally performed by the dentist. Delegation of these duties permits the dentist to spend time and energy on intricate procedures for which he or she has special expertise. The major modalities of responsibility that can be delegated include diagnostic data collection, educational and preventive services, and corrective therapy. It has been suggested that there is a need for expanding the duties of auxiliaries for prosthodontics in the future. It is our recommendation to use effectively the important auxiliary, the dental hygienist, in prosthodontic practice. For prosthodontic patients, the importance of the dental hygienist can be supported from two perspectives. First, the dental hygienist is formally educated in the oral and basic sciences and is qualified to perform intraoral procedures. Second, the dental hygienist is able to educate patients in regard to diet and oral hygiene habits. The dental hygienist's role in the prosthodontic practice has a potential that must not be overlooked. This opportunity, when provided, can be challenging, successful, and beneficial to the dentist, the patient, and the practice of prosthodontics.     

Aspects of Quality of Dental Hygiene Care in Supervised and Unsupervised Practices

Objective : The purpose of this study was to assess aspects of the quality of care provided by dental hygienists in a California demonstration project in which hygienists treated patients independent of dentists' supervision. Methods : The structure and process of care were evaluated in nine independent practices using site visits and reviews of 25 records at each practice. The findings were compared to evaluations of six general dentist practices reviewed for a government agency and insurance company during the same time period. Patient satisfaction was assessed by a questionnaire. Results : The structural aspects of the unsupervised hygienist practices were generally acceptable and surpassed the dentist practices in most areas, including infection control. For process, the hygienist practices had high percentages of acceptable care and were significantly better than the dentist practices in several areas, including follow-up to medical findings, updating the medical history at recall, and documenting the evaluation of the periodontal status and soft tissues. Ninety-eight percent of patients expressed satisfaction with their care in hygienist practices. Conclusion : Under the circumstances of the demonstration project and the methods used to assess the quality of care, the study showed that independent dental hygienist practice did not increase the risk to the health and safety of the public.     

Productivity in Minnesota Dental Practices with Increased Visits by Older Patients

There is little scientific information on the economic impact of treating increased numbers of older adults, despite the current growth in this population. To assess the impact of patient age on dental practice productivity, we evaluated an economic production function that included the proportions of patient visits in two older age groups (61–69 years, 70+ years) as factors that might affect the dental service production process. We used data from 12,818 patient visits to 31 Minnesota dental practices enrolled in the Minnesota Dental Practice Analysis System (DPAS) between 1980 and 1984. Ordinary least squares multiple linear regression was used to detect potential associations between practice productivity, measured in standardized time and monetary outputs, and the proportions of visits by older patients. We found that increases in the proportion of visits by patients aged 70 years and older were associated with decreases in productivity when we controlled for differences in the mix of services used. Our results support the notion that dental practices may be less productive when providing services to older patients compared to younger patients. These findings may have implications for personnel and policy planning. Further investigation of this issue is warranted because of the limited number of practices included in the study.     

Dental hygienists''influence on the patients''knowledge, motivation, self-care, and perception of change

The purpose of this study was to assess the success of the dental hygienist in the dental health education of dental patients in general dental practice. Special emphasis was laid on health education in the field of periodontics. The answers on a questionnaire of 159 dental patients who visited a dental hygienist were compared with the answers of 302 dental patients who had never visited a dental hygienist. The comparison was done by means of t-test and regression analysis on specially developed scales with regard to knowledge, motivation, self-care, and perception of change. On all scales the dental patients who visited a dental hygienist scored better. This difference remained when social demographic variables and the dentist's influence were taken into account. This indicates that the dental hygienist is successful in the behavioral aspect of her work.     

The collaborative practice of dental hygiene

Abstract:  This paper discusses the collaborative practice of dental hygiene, primarily using examples from California and New Mexico. Several advantages are discussed, including an increased access to all populations and more respect for the field. The earliest roles of a dental hygienist reflect common components of a collaborative practice. Responsibilities of dental hygienists today as educators and preventive dental providers are also tied to this type of practice. Currently, few states in the USA allow such practices; however, benefits are discussed and the positive effects noted. Opposition to these practices exists, although the concerns have not been proven accurate. Collaborative dental hygiene practices are shown to be a positive avenue through which the population can gain access to noted provider shortages, as well as a rewarding option for the field of dental hygiene.     

Ohio dentists’ awareness and incorporation of the dental home concept

BackgroundThe authors measured the awareness of the dental home concept among pediatric dentists (PDs) and general practice dentists (GPs) in Ohio and determined whether they included dental home characteristics for children 5 years and younger into their practices.MethodsThe authors sent a pretested 20-question survey to all Ohio PDs and to a random sample of approximately 20 percent of GPs in Ohio. The authors designed the survey to elicit information about dental home awareness and the extent to which dental home characteristics were incorporated into dental practices.ResultsMore than 90 percent of both GPs and PDs incorporated or intended to incorporate into their dental practices the specific dental home characteristics mentioned in 20 of 41 items related to dental home characteristics. Of the respondents who did not already incorporate dental home characteristics into their practices, however, most did not intend to do so. Less than 50 percent of respondents in both groups responded positively to some items in the culturally effective group, and GPs were less likely than were PDs to provide a range of behavior management services and to provide treatment for patients with complex medical and dental treatment needs. PDs were more likely than were GPs to accept Ohio Medicaid (64 versus 33 percent). PDs were more likely than were GPs (78 versus 18 percent) to be familiar with the term “dental home.” More recent dental school graduates were more familiar with the term.ConclusionsMost Ohio PDs’ and GPs’ practices included characteristics found in the definition of dental home, despite a general lack of concept awareness on the part of GPs. Research is needed to provide an evidence base for the dental home.Practical ImplicationsOnce an evidence base is developed for the important aspects of the dental home and the definition is revised, efforts should be made to incorporate these aspects more broadly into dental practice.     

Supply Decisions among Dentists Working within a Fixed-fee System of Dental Care Provision

In Norway fees for dental treatment did not increase at the same rate as prices for other goods and services during the 1980s. The aim of this study was to examine how this decrease in fees in real terms has influenced dentists' work decisions with respect to supply of services. Data on characteristics of the dentist and the dental practice were collected for 1979, 1984, and 1986. The dependent variable was supply of dental services, measured as the number of patient care hours worked per annum. The hourly fee for dental care was equivalent to dentists hourly wage rate. Supply increased as fees decreased. This could be explained either as a response of the patient or the dentist to reduced fees. Although the data did not give conclusive evidence as to which effect was most important, the authors have put forward the view that the main effect was dentists' response to reduced fees. The main argument put in favor of this view is that dentists have an overall knowledge of the effect of a change in fees on their income. The impact of a change in fees is much greater on the provider who supplies the services to many individuals over a long period of time, than on an individual consumer who buys the services once or twice a year. It was concluded that, in the short run, a fixed-fee schedule may not be very effective in limiting costs for dental care.     

Patient-active prevention in primary dental care: a characterisation of general practices in Northern Ireland.

AIM: To investigate the preventive orientation of general dental practices by examining their patient-active prevention activities, practice policies for prevention and employment strategies. METHOD: All general dental practices located within the region of the Eastern Health and Social Services Board (EHSSB) in Northern Ireland were contacted and invited to participate. A questionnaire assessed practice characteristics, patient-active prevention, practice policies and employment strategies. The principal general dental practitioner (GDP) was invited to complete the questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy-seven per cent of practices participated. Nearly all the practices provided patient-active prevention; however, lower proportions of dentists provided advice on diet for dental caries (3%), oral hygiene instruction, fluoride toothpaste use and interdental cleaning (7%) with each new course of dental treatment. 'Patient-active' prevention practices were 5.8 times more likely to employ a hygienist and 5.3 times more likely to have a practice policy to screen for oral cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the employment of a hygienist is central to the reorientation of primary dental care. The Government must be encouraged to provide the financial means to allow primary care to shift from being disease-centred to health-focused.     

Attitudes of the Victorian oral health workforce to the employment and scope of practice of dental hygienists

BACKGROUND: Increasing the number of dental hygienists and expanding their scope of practice are two policy directions that are currently being explored to increase the supply of dental services in the context of projected oral health workforce shortages in Australia. Understanding factors relating to the employment of hygienists and the attitudes of the oral health workforce to dental hygiene practice are important in this policy debate. METHODS: A postal survey of a random sample of Victorian dentists, periodontists, orthodontists and hygienists was undertaken in 2006. Dentists and specialists were grouped into those whose practice employed or did not employ a hygienist. Data on the attitudes of dentists, specialists and hygienists towards various aspects of dental hygiene practice were explored. RESULTS: A response rate of 65.3 per cent was achieved. Hygienists believed that their employment made dental care more affordable (53.7 per cent) and improved access to dental care (88.1 per cent), while few dentists believed hygienists made care more affordable. Most hygienists believed they were capable of diagnosing periodontal disease and dental caries and formulating a treatment plan, but there was less support from employers and non-employers. Dentists were strongly opposed to independent practice for dental hygienists, although there was qualified support from employers for increasing the scope of practice for hygienists. CONCLUSIONS: Dentists who worked with hygienists acknowledged their contribution to increasing practice profitability, efficiency and accessibility of dental services to patients. Hygienists and employers supported increasing the scope of dental hygiene practice, however the majority of non-employers opposed any expansion.