Benefits of off-pump bypass on neurologic and clinical morbidity: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Neurologic and clinical morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can be significant. By avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass, off-pump CABG (OPCAB) may reduce morbidity. METHODS: Sixty patients (30 CABG and 30 OPCAB) were prospectively randomized. Neurocognitive testing was performed before the operation and 2 weeks and 1 year after the operation. Neurologic testing to detect stroke and (99m)Tc-HMPAO whole-brain single photon emission computed tomography scanning to assess cerebral perfusion were performed before the operation and 3 days afterward. Bilateral middle cerebral artery transcranial Doppler scanning was performed intraoperatively to detect cerebral microemboli. All examiners were blinded to treatment group. Clinical morbidity and costs were compared. RESULTS: Coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with more cerebral microemboli (575 +/- 278.5 CABG versus 16.0 +/- 19.5 OPCAB (median +/- semiinterquartile range) and significantly reduced cerebral perfusion after the operation to the bilateral occipital, cerebellar, precunei, thalami, and left temporal lobes (p < or = 0.01). Cerebral perfusion with OPCAB was unchanged. Compared with base line, OPCAB patients performed better on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (total and recognition scores) at both 2 weeks and at 1 year (p < or = 0.05), whereas CABG performance was statistically unchanged for all cognitive measures. Patients who underwent CABG had more chest tube drainage (1389 +/- 1256 mL CABG versus 789 +/- 586 mL OPCAB, p = 0.02) and required more blood (3.9 +/- 5.8 U CABG versus 1.2 +/- 2.2 U OPCAB, p = 0.02), fresh frozen plasma (3.0 +/- 6.0 U CABG versus 0.5 +/- 2.2 U OPCAB, p = 0.03), and hours of postoperative use of dopamine (16.3 +/- 21.2 hours CABG versus 7.3 +/- 9.7 hours OPCAB, p = 0.04). These differences culminated in higher costs for CABG ($23,053 +/- $5,320 CABG versus $17,780 +/- $4,390 OPCAB, p < 0.0001). One stroke occurred with CABG, compared with none with OPCAB (p = NS). One OPCAB patient died because of a pulmonary embolus (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CABG, OPCAB may reduce neurologic and clinical morbidity as well as cost.     

Clinical outcomes, angiographic patency, and resource utilization in 200 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study compared clinical outcomes and resource utilization in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Angiographic patency was documented in the OPCAB group. METHODS: From April 1997 through November 1999, OPCAB was performed in 200 consecutive patients, and the results were compared with those in a contemporaneous matched control group of 1,000 patients undergoing CABG. Patients were matched according to age, sex, preexisting disease (renal failure, diabetes, pulmonary disease, stroke, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, previous myocardial infarction, and primary or redo status. Follow-up in the OPCAB patients was 93% and averaged 13.4 months. RESULTS: Hospital death (1.0%), postoperative stroke (1.5%), myocardial infarction (1.0%), and re-entry for bleeding (1.5%) occurred infrequently in the OPCAB group. There were reductions in the rates of transfusion (33.0% versus 70.0%; p < 0.001) and deep sternal wound infection (0% versus 2.2%; p = 0.067) in the OPCAB group compared with the CABG group. Angiographic assessment of 421 grafted arteries was performed in 167 OPCAB patients (83.5%) prior to hospital discharge. All but five were patent (98.8%) (93.3% FitzGibbon A, 5.5% FitzGibbon B, 1.2% FitzGibbon O). All 163 internal mammary artery grafts were patent. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduced postoperative hospital stay from 5.7 +/- 5.3 days in the CABG group to 3.9 +/- 2.6 days (p < 0.001), with a decrease in hospital cost of 15.0% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduces hospital cost, postoperative length of stay, and morbidity compared with CABG on cardiopulmonary bypass. Off-pump coronary bypass grafting is safe, cost effective, and associated with excellent graft patency and clinical outcomes.     

Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce the incidence of clinically evident renal dysfunction after multivessel myocardial revascularization?

In this prospective, observational trial, we determined whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) was associated with less postoperative renal dysfunction (RD) compared with coronary bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CABG). All patients undergoing primary, isolated coronary surgery at our institution in the year 2000 participated. Data collected on each patient included demographics, preoperative risk factors for RD, perioperative events, and serum creatinine concentrations from date of admission until discharge or death. The criteria for RD was both a >or=50% increase from preoperative creatinine and an absolute postoperative creatinine >or=2.0 mg/dL (177 microM). Student's t-test or the Fisher's exact test was used to compare groups. Stepwise multiple logistic regression identified determinants of RD; P < 0.05 significant. The CABG group (n = 119) differed from the OPCAB group (n = 220) with respect to age (64 +/- 13 versus 67 +/- 10 yr, P = 0.0074) and number of distal grafts (median 4 versus 3, P = 0.0003). Type of operation did not associate with the presence of postoperative RD: 18 (8.2%) of 220 OPCAB patients versus 12 (10%) of 119 CABG patients (P = 0.55). Our data suggest that choice of operative technique (OPCAB versus CABG) is not associated with reduced renal morbidity.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass versus off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass grafting: does eliminating the pump reduce morbidity and cost?

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may contribute to the complications and cost of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Off-pump CABG (OPCAB) allows coronary revascularization without CPB. We hypothesized that OPCAB provides satisfactory graft patency while reducing complications and cost compared with CABG with CPB. METHODS: We prospectively followed 80 patients undergoing CABG: 40 patients undergoing OPCAB and 40 patients undergoing CABG with CPB. OPCAB patients underwent angiography within 48 hours of surgery to determine early graft patency. Incidence of complications, length of stay, and costs were recorded for each patient. The influence of the number of vessels bypassed was analyzed. RESULTS: OPCAB patients (n = 40) underwent grafting of 2.7 +/- 0.7 vessels per patient compared with 3.6 +/- 0.8 vessels per patient in the CABG with CPB group (n = 40) (p < 0.0001). Angiography demonstrated 105 of 108 (97%) of grafts were patent in the OPCAB group. Incidence of complications, length of stay, and costs did not differ between the OPCAB and CABG with CPB groups. Number of vessels grafted showed a positive correlation to total costs in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: While OPCAB provided satisfactory early graft patency, there was no significant difference between OPCAB and CABG with CPB with regard to cost, length of stay, or incidence of complications. In this study, eliminating CPB did not reduce morbidity or cost after CABG.     

Perioperative and mid-term results of coronary bypass surgery in patients undergoing chronic dialysis.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate perioperative and mid-term results of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive dialysis patients who required CABG over a 5-year period were investigated retrospectively. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 62.5+/-11.5 years. The mean number of diseased vessels was 2.3W0.8. Off-pump CABG (OPCAB) was performed in 12 patients. The mean number of anastomoses per patient was 2.5+/-1.1. The perioperative mortality was 5.7%, and the average duration of hospitalization was 25.3+/-13.4 days. Overall 5-year survival rates were 63.7%. The cardiac-related 5-year survival rate was 89.3%, and the cardiac event-free rate was 51.7%. Multivariate analysis failed to identify any significant prognosticators for perioperative or long-term outcomes. The morbidity rate was significantly lower in patients undergoing OPCAB than in patients undergoing conventional CABG (8.3 vs. 47.8%; p=0.03). Perioperative mortality in the OPCAB group was 0%, and the average duration of hospitalization was shorter in the OPCAB group than in the conventional CABG group (19.7 days vs. 28.5 days; p=0.1). CONCLUSION: In the context of coronary artery bypass surgery, OPCAB produced better outcomes than conventional CABG procedure in patients undergoing chronic dialysis. Further-more, OPCAB procedure seems to offer a greater benefit to dialysis patients than non-dialysis patients.     

The clinical outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in the elderly patients

Objective: There has been a body of evidence showing that off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) may reduce morbidity and mortality in the elderly patients. We reviewed our experience, retrospectively, on elderly patients aged 75 years and older who were operated on using the OPCAB technique. We compared their outcome to a similar group of elderly patients who were operated on using conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during the same period of time. Methods: Registry data and patients' notes and charts were reviewed for 56 consecutive elderly OPCAB patients (age 78.5±3.5 years) and 87 consecutive CPB patients (age 77.2±2.4 years, P=0.01). Both groups had similar risk factor profiles: Parsonnet score 17.4±4.4 (OPCAB) versus 16.6±5.2 (CPB), P=0.19. We studied in detail their preoperative and postoperative data in order to compare the outcomes of both techniques. Results: The length of stay in the intensive therapy unit (ITU) was 35.4±52.9 h for OPCAB patients and 77.6±144.9 h for CPB patients (P=0.0008). No patient died within 30 days in the OPCAB group, whilst ten (11%) CPB patients (P=0.0066) died within 30 days. The incidence of serious complications (including pulmonary oedema, septicaemia, permanent stroke and renal dysfunction requiring haemofiltration or haemodialysis) was one (2%) in the OPCAB group and 11 (13%) in the CPB group (P=0.028). CPB patients required a significantly higher number ten (12%) of intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) inserted compared to only one patient (2%) in the OPCAB group who required IABP insertion (P=0.05). Nine (11%) CPB patients were re-operated on for bleeding compared to no OPCAB patient (0%) needing re-operation, P=0.011. Conclusions: Although the mean age of the OPCAB group was significantly higher than the CPB group, the OPCAB group showed a significant reduction in postoperative serious morbidity, ITU stay and mortality. We believe that such a conclusion may have some effect on the decision-making and cost-effectiveness when performing coronary bypass surgery on the elderly population.     

Effect of gender on outcomes of beating heart operations

BACKGROUND: A worse outcome has been observed in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with men. We sought to determine whether this gender difference would be applicable in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) procedures. METHODS: We compared outcomes among 187 consecutive patients undergoing OPCAB over a 12-month period by a single surgeon (J.H.L.). This study included 61 women and 126 men, representing 91% of all isolated CABG operations during the same time. RESULTS: The demographics were as follows: Women (n = 61) were older than men (n = 126) (67.5 versus 64.6 years; p = 0.05). They had a greater prevalence of congestive heart failure (28% versus 17%; p = 0.005), and were more frequently on intravenous nitroglycerin preoperatively (49% versus 32%; p = 0.05). Overall mortality was 1.6% (3 of 187). In-hospital complications were as follows: deaths 3.3% in women and 0.9% in men (p = 0.25); major bleeding 0% in women and 3.2% in men (p = 0.30); stroke 1.5% in women and 0% in men (p = NS). Mediastinitis or renal failure was not noted in either group. Extubation times (6.6 versus 6.1 hours; p = 0.001), surgical intensive care unit length of stay (43 hours versus 37 hours; p = 0.013), and postoperative length of stay (6.4 days versus 5.8 days; p = 0.014) were all significantly longer in women compared with men. When OPCAB women were compared with a matched cohort of women undergoing CABG, length of stay was similar, whereas OPCAB men realized a 13% reduction in length of stay compared with men undergoing conventional CABG (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Women presenting for OPCAB are older and have greater comorbidities than men. The elimination of cardiopulmonary bypass did not improve the recovery time of women, a finding that was strikingly different from the effect seen in men. These compelling results suggest that biochemical, hormonal, or pharmacokinetic factors in women may neutralize the anticipated beneficial effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Beating heart versus conventional single-vessel reoperative coronary artery bypass

BACKGROUND: Reoperative (redo) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump) is associated with a higher morbidity and mortality than first-time CABG. It is unknown, however, whether CABG without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump) may yield an improved clinical outcome over conventional on-pump redo CABG. METHODS: We compared the perioperative outcomes of patients with single-vessel disease who underwent on-pump (n = 41) versus off-pump (n = 91) redo CABG between April 1992 and July 1999. The two groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics and risk stratification: mean Parsonnet scores were 26 +/- 9 for on-pump versus 24 +/- 8 for off-pump patients (p = nonsignificant). RESULTS: On-pump redo patients had a higher rate of postoperative transfusions (58% on-pump versus 27% off-pump, p = 0.001), prolonged ventilatory support (17% on-pump versus 4% off-pump, p = 0.03), and a higher rate of postoperative atrial fibrillation (29% on-pump versus 14% off-pump, p = 0.04). On-pump redo CABG was also associated with prolonged postoperative length of stay (8 +/- 4 days on-pump versus 5 +/- 2 days off-pump, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in on-pump than in off-pump patients (10% versus 1%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Single-vessel off-pump redo CABG can be performed safely with a lower operative morbidity and mortality than on-pump CABG and an abbreviated hospital stay compared with conventional on-pump redo CABG.     

Off-pump versus on-pump myocardial revascularization in low-risk patients with one or two vessel disease: perioperative results in a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: To evaluate hospital mortality and morbidity after myocardial revascularization in a prospective and multicenter study, comparing on-pump versus off-pump in a special subset of patients with lesions in the left descending artery, alone or associated with the right coronary artery. METHODS: A multicenter prospective randomized study was performed. One hundred and sixty selected low-risk patients were enrolled; 80 patients were operated on-pump (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], group I) and 80 patients were operated off-pump (off-pump coronary artery bypass [OPCAB], group II). One hundred and five were male and ages ranged from 39 to 70 years old; mean 58.81 +/- 9.31 and median 59. Preoperative clinical characteristics were similar in both groups; only previous myocardial infarction was higher in the OPCAB group. Patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (FE 相似文献   

Off-pump coronary artery bypass

OBJECTIVES: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on the beating heart has become popular procedure in cardiac surgery and its initial results appeared favorable. We report our early and mid-term results of off-pump CABG performed at Shin-Tokyo Hospital. METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing off-pump or conventional on-pump CABG from September 1, 1996, to August 31, 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent off-pump CABG were further classified into 2 groups; MIDCAB (Off-pump CABG for single vessel revascularization via a small skin incision) and OPCAB (off-pump CABG mainly approached via midline sternotomy) group. Their preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Among a total of 995 cases of CABG, 194 cases were off-pump CABG (male/female 142/52, mean age 66.9). The mean number of distal anastomoses in off-pump CABG was 1.9 +/- 0.9 (1.0 +/- 0.0 in MIDCAB and 2.3 +/- 0.7 in OPCAB), which was significantly fewer than in on-pump CABG (3.6 +/- 1.1), with p < 0.0001. Intubation time (5.3 +/- 5.7 hours in off-pump CABG vs 13.1 +/- 24.2 hours in on-pump CABG), ICU stay (1.7 +/- 1.1 vs 3.2 +/- 3.0 days), and postoperative hospital stay (14.0 +/- 7.9 vs 18.1 +/- 12.1 days) in off-pump CABG were significantly shorter than in on-pump CABG (p < 0.0001). In the off-pump CABG group, there were no in-hospital deaths and 14 major complications, fewer than in on-pump CABG (8 hospital deaths and 114 major complications). Postoperative angiography before hospital discharge was conducted in 80 patients (41.2%) and showed 2 occlusions, giving a graft patency rate of 98.6% in the off-pump group. During follow-up (0.9 +/- 0.6 year) period, there were 5 non-cardiac deaths and 20 cardiac events in the off-pump group. The actuarial survival rate at 36 months was 94.6% for off-pump CABG, showing no significant difference from the rate for conventional CABG patients (95.2% at 36 month, p = NS) The event-free rate was 84.0% at 36 months in off-pump CABG patients; however, which was less favorable than on-pump CABG patients (88.0% at 36 months, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both in-hospital and mid-term results for off-pump CABG patients were acceptable. Isolated CABG can thus be safely performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. Advances in coronary stabilization have contributed to these improved results. The observed long-term cardiac events may be related to incomplete revascularization.     

Midterm outcomes of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery revascularization in renal transplant recipients

Abstract Objectives: Renal transplant recipients have high mortality from cardiac causes and are frequently in need of coronary interventions. Surgical coronary revascularization is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in this patient population. This study was undertaken to evaluate outcomes of on‐pump versus off‐pump revascularization in renal transplant recipients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 43 renal transplant recipients who underwent surgical coronary revascularization with functioning allografts. Revascularization was performed on‐pump [coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)] in 21 patients and off‐pump [off‐pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB)] in 22 patients. Results: Preoperative characteristics did not differ between the two groups except for age and incidence of prior sternotomy. Total operative time and transfusion requirements were similar. The on‐pump group received a higher number of bypass grafts (p = 0.03). Overall 30‐day, one‐year, five‐year, and eight‐year survival was 90%, 76%, 61%, and 32% for CABG group, and 95%, 86%, 62%, and 48% for OPCAB group (p = 0.53). The postoperative peak creatinine was higher in the CABG patients than in OPCAB patients (p = 0.04). At discharge, there was no difference in mean creatinine between the two groups. The rate of return to permanent dialysis after revascularization was similar (28% for CABG and 22% for OPCAB, p = 0.73). There was no difference in dialysis‐free survival up to eight‐years postrevascularization (p = 0.63). Conclusions: Despite higher mortality risk, surgical coronary revascularization can be performed safely in renal transplant recipients. OPCAB resulted in no improvement in patient survival or renal allograft function compared to on‐pump revascularization. (J Card Surg 2011;26:591‐595)     

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a small thoracotomy versus off-pump: a case-matched study

Objective: The minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) operation performed via a small thoracotomy has not previously been examined in a direct comparison to sternotomy off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). Methods: We matched, according to age, gender, left ventricular function, and median number of distal anastomoses, 150 patients who underwent MICS CABG via small left thoracotomy, and 150 patients who received sternotomy OPCAB. All operations were performed by the same surgeon. Results: There was no perioperative mortality (0/300). In the MICS CABG group, pump assistance was used in 28/150 (19%) patients, and conversion to sternotomy occurred in 10/150 (6.7%) patients. In the OPCAB group, conversion to on-pump occurred in 3/150 (2.0%) patients. There were four (2.7%) reoperations for bleeding and one (0.7%) for anastomotic revision in each group. The median hospital length of stay was 5 days for MICS CABG (average 5.4), and 6 days for OPCAB (average 7.2) (P = 0.02). New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 35 (23%) MICS CABG patients and in 42 (28%) OPCAB patients (P = 0.3). No wound infection occurred with MICS CABG versus six (4.0%) with OPCAB (P = 0.03). A self-limiting left pleural effusion developed in 22 (15%) MICS CABG patients and in six (4.0%) OPCAB patients (P = 0.002). The median time to return to full physical activity was 12 days in MICS CABG patients versus >5 weeks in OPCAB patients (P < 0.001). Conclusions: MICS CABG is a valuable alternative for patients in need of multivessel CABG. The operation appears at least as safe as OPCAB, and associated with shorter hospital length of stay, less wound infections, and faster postoperative recovery than OPCAB.     

Off-pump multivessel coronary artery surgery in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, which may be more marked in high-risk patients. We evaluated our results of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) in high-risk patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and compared them with results in similar patients who underwent operation on cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: A total of 1,075 patients who underwent OPCAB between October 1996 and June 2001 and who had one or more of the following risk factors were included in the study: poor left ventricular function (EF < or = 30%), advanced age (> 70 years), left main stenosis, acute myocardial infarction, and redo coronary artery surgery. These patients were compared with 2,312 similar patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass during the same period. Preoperative risk factors, intraoperative variables, and postoperative results were analyzed and compared between two groups. RESULTS: The average number of grafts was 3.0 +/- 0.4 and 3.2 +/- 0.3 in the off-pump (OPCAB) and on-pump (CCAB) groups, respectively. Hospital mortality was 3.2% and 4.5% in OPCAB and CCAB groups respectively (p = 0.109). Perioperative myocardial infarction, requirement of inotropic agents, stroke, and renal dysfunction were comparable in two groups. Intubation time (19 +/- 5 vs 24 +/- 6 hours, p < 0.001), mean blood loss (362 +/- 53 vs 580 +/- 66 mL, p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (14.3 vs 19.7%, p < 0.001), and prolonged ventilation (4.6 vs 7.6%, p = 0.002) were less in OPCAB group. Intensive care unit stay (20 +/- 8 hours) and hospital stay (6 +/- 3 days) were significantly less in the OPCAB group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery surgery can be safely performed in high-risk patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Operative mortality is comparable to that associated with on-pump surgery, and avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with reduced postoperative morbidity in these patients.     

Myocardial Revascularization of the Beating Heart in High-Risk Patients

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been proposed as an alternative technique in patients at high risk for conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The purpose of this article is to evaluate the potential benefit of such an approach. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the perioperative results of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) performed from January 1995 to December 1999. Patients were divided into three groups on the basis of their preoperative risk factors: age greater than 80 years, reoperative CABG, and left ventricular ejection fraction percentage (LVEF%) less than 40%. The three subgroups were compared with patients operated on-CPB (ONCAB) during the same period of time. A total of 172 octogenarians had ONCAB versus 97 OPCAB, 307 reoperations were ONCAB versus 274 OPCAB, and 514 patients with LVEF% less than 40% were operated ONCAB versus 220 OPCAB. RESULTS: Preoperative comorbidities were homogeneously distributed in the OPCAB and ONCAB groups. More extensive coronary artery disease was found in the ONCAB groups. A trend for a lower number of perioperative complications was reported in the OPCAB groups. Freedom from overall complications was significantly higher (p < 0.005) in the OPCAB group. Actual mortality rates in the OPCAB and ONCAB groups were comparable (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: CABG can be performed safely without CPB in patients with a high preoperative risk profile. Freedom from perioperative complications is markedly higher when the OPCAB approach is utilized.     

Fast track recovery of elderly coronary bypass surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: To ascertain whether early extubation and fast-track treatment protocols are feasible in elderly patients, we analyzed 487 consecutive patients who had isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between January 1995 and June 1997, constituting the experience of a single surgeon. METHODS: Management consistently applied to all patients emphasized early extubation protocol, tepid cardioplegia and normothermic bypass to reduce pump times, early mobilization and chest tube removal, and protocol treatment of atrial fibrillation. Elderly patients at least 70 years old (n = 176, mean age 75 years) were compared with younger patients (n = 311, mean age 58 years). RESULTS: The hospital mortality rate was 0.8% (4 of 487 patients), and there was no difference in the operative mortality rate of the older cohort versus the younger cohort (0.6% versus 0.9%; p > 0.05). Older patients had a higher incidence of peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, prior strokes, renal failure, and cerebrovascular disease (p < 0.05). Early extubation was achieved in 71% of younger patients versus 57% of older cohort (95% confidence interval, 14%+/-9%; p = 0.002). Older patients had significantly higher incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (27% versus 14%; 95% CI, 13%+/-7%; p < 0.001), a factor responsible for shorter length of stay among younger patients (5.6+/-2.8 days versus 7.2+/-3.7 days; 95% CI, 1.6+/-0.3 days; p < 0.001). Nonetheless discharge before the fifth postoperative day was achieved in 34% of the elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although elderly patients have a higher acuity of illness, critical pathways for accelerated discharge are safe and feasible in most elderly patients.     

Postoperative hyperthermia following off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE: Hyperthermia is common in the first 24 hours following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). An inflammatory response to CPB is often implicated in the pathophysiology of this fever. Unlike CABG with CPB, the temperature pattern after off-pump CABG (OPCAB), where CPB is avoided, has not yet been described. The purpose of this study was to describe the postoperative temperature pattern following OPCAB and to compare it with that following on-pump cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Consenting patients undergoing CABG or OPCAB procedures. INTERVENTIONS: Observational. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the CABG patients, 89% had temperature elevations above 38 degrees C, versus 44% of the OPCAB patients (P = 0.04). Peak body temperature was higher in the on-pump patients (CABG 38.5 degrees C +/- 0.4 degrees C versus OPCAB 37.9 degrees C +/- 0.5 degrees C; P = 0.002), as was the area under the curve for temperatures greater than 38 degrees C (CABG 1.6 +/- 1.7 degrees C/hr versus OPCAB 0.4 +/- 1.2 degrees C/hr; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump CABG surgery patients experience less hyperthermia compared with on-pump CABG patients. The reasons for a lower incidence and severity of hyperthermia after OPCAB surgery are not known, but may be related to a reduced inflammatory response.     

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass in high-risk subgroups

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has pathophysiologic sequelae that may be more severe in high-risk subsets. We wanted to determine whether off-pump coronary bypass (OPCAB) could optimize outcomes. METHODS: Our database of 242 OPCAB patients undergoing complete revascularization was compared to a base of 483 CABG patients undergoing CPB. Results were compared for the overall series and in the following high-risk subsets: 80 years of age or older, ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction (EF) < or = 0.25), prior neurologic event or renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and reoperation. RESULTS: In the overall series, OPCAB significantly reduced the incidence of intraoperative transfusion requirements and showed a trend toward reduced morbidity in terms of postoperative neurologic and renal complications, prolonged ventilator requirement greater than 3 days, and bleeding requiring reexploration. Mortality was less in the OPCAB group (0.4% versus 2.7%, p = not significant). Similar results were achieved in the following high-risk subgroups (n = off-pump/on-pump): 80 years of age or older (n = 28/58), EF less than or equal to 25% (n = 13/26), preoperative neurologic event (n = 25/36), preoperative renal failure (n = 27/46), COPD (n = 33/43), and reoperation (n = 28/76). OPCAB decreased the incidence of prolonged ventilation in COPD patients (0/33 [0%] versus 4/43 [9.3%] p = not significant) and decreased the incidence of renal complications in the elderly (1/28 [3.6%] versus 9/58 [15.5%] p = not significant). Off-pump coronary bypass reduced but did not eliminate neurologic events in the elderly (2/28 [7.1%] versus 8/58 [13.8%] p = not significant). CONCLUSION: Off-pump coronary bypass significantly reduced the incidence of transfusion requirement compared to the CPB counterparts and had a consistent trend in reducing morbidity and mortality overall and in all high-risk subsets. Neurologic events are not eliminated in OPCAB.     

Multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly patient is associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. The avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in this population is potentially beneficial. We examined our initial experience with off-pump multivessel coronary artery revascularization in patients aged 70 years and older. METHODS: In a consecutive series of 300 off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) operations performed by a single surgeon between 1996 and 1999, 98 patients were aged 70 years and older. These patients were compared with a consecutive cohort of 497 patients aged 70 years and older operated on with CPB in the same institution from 1995 to 1996, period where OPCAB surgery was not performed in our institution. RESULTS: Patients in the beating heart group were older (75+/-4 vs. 74+/-3 years; P=0.001). Gender distribution and other preoperative risk factors were comparable for the two groups. On average, 3.0+/-0.8 and 2.8+/-0.7 grafts per patient were completed in the OPCAB and the CPB groups, respectively (P=0.007). Perioperative mortality rates (OPCAB group, 3.1%; CPB group, 3.6%), perioperative myocardial infarction (OPCAB, 2.0%; CPB, 5.1%) and neurologic events (OPCAB, 1.0%; CPB, 3.2%) were comparable for the two groups. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was lower in the OPCAB group (42 vs. 54%; P=0.05). The need for allogenic blood transfusions was significantly less in the OPCAB group (53 vs. 82%; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged 70 years and older, multivessel OPCAB surgery is associated with lower rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation and reduced transfusion requirements. Multivessel OPCAB in the elderly patient is an acceptable alternative to procedures performed with CPB.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting: an off-pump versus on-pump review

There has been a proliferation in the number of coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) being performed without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, the benefits of off-pump coronary artery grafting (OPCAB) are still being determined. The aim of this retrospective review was to compare the perioperative outcomes of CPB patients with OPCAB patients and to identify the patients most likely to benefit from the off-pump procedure. We reviewed the perioperative data of all isolated CABG patients at two metropolitan hospitals for the period of August 2000 to September 2001. The two groups (OPCAB vs. CPB) were further divided into subgroups identifying patients by their predicted mortality (higher-risk and lower-risk) and the number of distal graft anastomoses received (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5). A p value less than .05 was considered significant. Out of the total of 882 patients, 46.2% were OPCAB cases. Both CPB and OPCAB groups were similar in terms of demographics and predicted risk of mortality. Intraoperatively, OPCAB patients had fewer distal graft anastomoses (2.4 +/- 1.0 vs. 3.2 +/- 1.0, p < .001). Postoperatively, patients in the OPCAB group had less chest drainage (889 +/- 588 vs. 989 +/- 662 mls, p < .001), sustained fewer strokes (0.2 vs. 1.9%, p < .05), were transfused less (15.4 vs. 32.5%, p < .001) and were discharged earlier (7.3 +/- 5.6 vs. 8.5 +/- 9.1 days, p < .05). For higher-risk patients, OPCAB was associated with fewer reoperations for bleeding (1.3 vs. 6.4%, p < .05), a lower stroke rate (0 vs. 3.2%, p < .05), and a trend toward lower mortality (7.1 vs. 15.1%, p = .08). However, lower-risk OPCAB patients' stroke incidences (0.5% OPCAB group vs. 1.4% CPB group), and mortality rates (0.5 vs. 0.5%) were similar. Comparisons by number of grafts performed revealed that only the single-grafted OPCAB patients had statistically fewer postoperative complications, reduced chest drainage, and a shorter intensive care stay. Differences between either operation groups in transfusion rates were only statistically significant for the one to three grafted patients, while postoperative stays were similar for patients having four grafts. These results suggest that OPCAB is associated with a reduction in mortality and morbidity, particularly within the higher-risk patients. However, the benefits of OPCAB diminished with an increasing number of distal anastomoses performed.     

Coronary artery bypass in patients 80 years and over: is off-pump the operation of choice?

BACKGROUND: Octogenarians are at increased risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass. In this study we compared our experience with patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass (CAB) and those undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) to assess outcomes. METHODS: We used hospital database analysis in patients 80 years and older who underwent nonemergent coronary artery bypass with (N = 169) and without (N = 60) cardiopulmonary bypass from January 1999 through June 2001. RESULTS: Both groups were at increased perioperative risk based on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk model (7.7% OPCAB vs 5.8% CAB, p = 0.03). There were no operative deaths in the OPCAB group but there were eight (4.7%) in the CAB group (p = NS). Perioperative stroke (0% OPCAB vs 7.1% CAB, p = 0.04), prolonged ventilation (1.7% OPCAB vs 11.8% CAB, p = 0.02), and transfusion rate (33% OPCAB vs 70.4% CAB, p < 0.001) were all lower in the OPCAB group. A shorter hospital stay (6.3 days OPCAB vs 11.5 days CAB, p < 0.001) resulted in lower hospital cost in the OPCAB group ($9,363 OPCAB vs $12,312 CAB, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients was associated with fewer complications, a shorter hospital stay, and lower hospital cost. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting may be the operation of choice for octogenarians requiring surgical myocardial revascularization.