Neoadjuvant radiation influences the pseudocapsule in soft tissue sarcoma: A histopathologic and radiographic evaluation

Background and objectivesA pseudocapsule surrounds soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Its composition, response to neoadjuvant radiation, and clinical significance are poorly understood.MethodsSeventeen cases of high-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) were reviewed, ten of which were treated with neoadjuvant radiation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, pathology slides, and patient records were reviewed.ResultsIrradiated pseudocapsules were well-demarcated with fewer viable tumor cells and were thicker on both pathology and MRI measurements when compared to non-irradiated pseudocapsules (p < 0.001, p = 0.04, respectively). Pseudocapsule mean pathology width (MPW) was positively correlated with tumor necrosis percentage (p = 0.044), and negatively correlated with mitotic rate (p = 0.043), though pseudocapsule width measured on MRI did not correlate with these prognostic factors. Despite an evident treatment response to neoadjuvant radiation, viable tumor cells were present within the pseudocapsule and the surrounding healthy tissue.ConclusionsThe pseudocapsule in STS responds to radiation and there appears to be a correlation between pseudocapsule width and tumor necrosis and mitotic activity. As viable tumor cells are present beyond the pseudocapsule, surgeons should remain cautious in determining margins of resection in STS when using the pseudocapsule as a palpable landmark. This novel study is the most detailed to date to describe the histopathologic and radiographic characteristics of the STS pseudocapsule. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of the pseudocapsule.     

Oncological outcome after hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion for primarily unresectable versus locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma of extremities

IntroductionThe management of locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas, particularly in terms of a limb salvage strategy, represents a challenge, especially in recurrent tumors. In the context of a patient-tailored multimodal therapy, hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a promising limb-saving treatment option. We report the outcome of patients with primarily irresectable and locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treated by ILP.Patients and methodsData about patient demographics, clinical und histopathological characteristics, tumor response, morbidity and oncological outcome of all patients with STS, who underwent an ILP at our institution in a 10-year period, were retrospectively detected and analyzed.ResultsThe cohort comprised 30 patients. Two patients were treated with ILP for palliative tumor control, 13 patients because of a local recurrent soft tissue sarcoma (rSTS) and 15 patients because of primarily unresectable soft tissue sarcoma (puSTS). 25 of the 28 patients with curative intention received surgery after ILP (11 pts with rSTS and 14 pts with puSTS). Histopathologically we observed complete response in 6 patients (24%) and partial responses in 19 patients (76%) with a significant better remission in patients with puSTS (p = 0,043). Limb salvage rate was 75%. Mean follow-up was 69 months [range 13–142 months]. Seven (7/11; 64%) patients with rSTS and one (1/14; 7%) patient with puSTS developed local recurrence after ILP and surgery, whereas eight (8/13; 62%) rSTS patients and seven (7/15; 47%) puSTS patients developed distant metastasis. During follow-up, eight patients (28.5%) died of disease (5/13; 38%) rSTS and 3/15 (20%) puSTS. ILP in the group of previously irradiated sarcoma patients (n = 13) resulted in a limb salvage rate of 69% and was not associated in an increased risk for adverse events.DiscussionILP for advanced extremity STS is a treatment option for both puSTS and rSTS resulting in good local control and should be considered in multimodal management. ILP is also a good option for patients after radiation history.     

Surgery for metachronous metastasis of soft tissue sarcoma – A magnitude of benefit analysis using propensity score methods

IntroductionMetastasectomy is hypothesised to improve OS in metastatic STS, but evidence in favour of this approach derives from non-controlled single-arm cohorts affected by selection bias. The objective was to quantify the effect of metastasectomy vs. non-surgical management on overall survival (OS) in patients with metachronous metastases from extremity- and trunk soft tissue sarcoma (STS).Materials and methodsFrom a population of 1578 STS patients, 135 patients who underwent surgery for localised STS at two European centres between 1998 and 2015 and developed metachronous STS metastases were included. Propensity score analyses with inverse-probability-of-treatment-weights (IPTW) and landmark analyses were performed to control for selection and immortal time bias, respectively.ResultsOS was significantly longer in the 68 patients undergoing metastasectomy than in the 67 patients who were treated non-invasively for their metastasis (10-year OS: 23% vs. 4%; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.22–0.53, p < 0.0001). This association prevailed after IPTW-weighting of the data to control for the higher prevalence of favourable prognostic factors in the surgery group (adjusted 10-year OS: 17% vs. 3%, log-rank p < 0.0001; HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.20–0.52, p < 0.0001). Five-year OS estimates were 27.8% in patients who had and 14.5% in patients who had not undergone metastasectomy within the first 3 months after diagnosis of a metastasis (p < 0.0001).ConclusionIn this observational bi-centre study, metastasectomy was associated with prolonged survival in patients with metachronous STS metastases. In the absence of randomized studies, our results indicate that metastasectomy should be considered as an important treatment option for metachronous STS metastases.     

Complete pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment is associated with better survival outcomes in patients with soft tissue sarcoma: Results of a retrospective multicenter study

BackgroundLocally advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) management may include neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment by radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by wide surgical excision. While pathological complete response (pCR) to preoperative treatment is prognostic for survival in osteosarcomas, its significance for STS is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of pCR to pre-operative treatment on 3-year disease-free survival (3y-DFS) in STS patients.MethodsThis is an observational, retrospective, international, study of adult patients with primary non-metastatic STS of the extremities and trunk wall, any grade, diagnosed between 2008 and 2012, treated with at least neoadjuvant treatment and surgical resection and observed for a minimum of 3 years after diagnosis. The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of pCR. (≤5% viable tumor cells or ≥95% necrosis/fibrosis) on 3y-DFS. Effect on local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (MFS) overall survival (OS) at 3 years was also analyzed. Statistical univariate analysis utilized chi-square independence test and odds ratio confidence interval (CI) estimate, multivariate analysis was performed using LASSO.ResultsA total of 330 patients (median age 56 years old, range:19–95) treated by preoperative RT (67%), CT (15%) or CRT (18%) followed by surgery were included. pCR was achieved in 74/330 (22%) of patients, of which 56/74 (76%) had received RT. 3-yr DFS was observed in 76% of patients with pCR vs 61% without pCR (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that pCR is statistically associated with better MFS (95% CI, 1.054–3.417; p = 0.033), LRFS (95% CI, 1.226–5.916; p = 0.014), DFS (95% CI, 1.165–4.040; p = 0.015) and OS at 3 years (95% CI, 1.072–5.210; p = 0.033).ConclusionsIn a wide, heterogeneous STS population we showed that pCR to preoperative treatment is prognostic for survival.     

Soft tissue sarcoma in children,adolescents and young adults: Outcomes according to compliance with international initial care guidelines

BackgroundOutcomes for adults with soft tissue sarcoma are better when managed at referral centers. Care guidelines advise for 5 main criteria: 1-Imaging before biopsy; 2-Tumor biopsy before surgery; 3-Multidiscipinary team discussion (MTD) before biopsy; 4-Biopsy in “expert centers”; 5-Somatic molecular biology feasible. The aim is to describe and assess the prognostic impact of initial management of STS according to the type of referring centers and the number of optimal criteria.MethodsMonocentric retrospective analysis of the management of 127 youths (0–25 years) with localized STS treated from 2006 to 2015.ResultsMedian age at diagnosis was 9.6 years (range: 025). Overall, only 41% patients had 5/5, 28% 3–4, 31% ≤2. No adequate imaging was performed before surgery/biopsy for 18% patients, no biopsy before treatment for 29%. Patients referred by “expert centers” had higher compliance to guidelines (P = 0.025). Upfront surgery was performed in 59/127 patients. Immediate re-operation was inversely related to the number of criteria (0% when 5 criteria vs. 14% for 3–4, 46% if ≤ 2; P < 0.001). For malignant tumors, outcome was better when 5 criteria were reached: 5 year EFS 90.8% (81.4–100.0%) vs. 71.6 for (60.4–84.9%; ≤4 criteria; p = 0.033), OS 93.6% (85.5–100%) vs. 79.5% (68.9–91.8%; p = 0.11), and LRFFS 90.6% (81.0–100.0) vs. 73.1% (62.0–86.3%; p = 0.047).ConclusionLess than half of the youths with STS are initially managed according to international guidelines, highlighting the need for better information about optimal management. These results plead for immediate management in reference centers to reduce initial burden of therapy.     

Planned combined onco-plastic (COP) surgical approach improves oncologic outcomes in soft tissue sarcomas

BackgroundCombined modality of radiotherapy and surgery is the standard of treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS). The goal of this study was to assess whether a Combined Onco-Plastic (COP) surgical approach in the setting of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy can improve the oncologic outcomes of STS and reduce the rate of wound complications.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of all patients with STS treated at a single sarcoma centre (St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne) between 2007 and 2018. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether they have received the COP approach or were closed primarily by the orthopaedic surgeon. We analysed oncological outcomes and rate of wound complications.ResultsA total of 546 patients with comparable demographics and tumor characteristics were included. The COP approach was performed in 75.6% of the patients. Wide margins were obtained in 97.4% of the cases, and this was significantly higher in the COP group (p < 0.001). The cumulative rate of local recurrence was 4.9%, with a 52% risk reduction in the COP approach, although this reduction was not significant (HR = 0.48; 95% CI 0.21–1.06; p = 0.070). The COP approach had better disease free survival (DFS) (aHR 1.86, 95% CI 1.45–2.37; p < 0.001) and Overall survival (risk of death aHR 0.49; 95% CI 0.30–0.79; p = 0.004). The overall wound complication rate was 18.6% with no difference between the two groups.ConclusionA planned collaboration between the orthopaedic oncologist and the plastic surgeon is beneficial in the treatment of STS after neo-adjuvant radiotherapy, allowing remarkably good oncological outcomes and a low rate of wound complications.     

A closer look at the natural history and recurrence patterns of high-grade truncal/extremity leiomyosarcomas: A multi-institutional analysis from the US Sarcoma Collaborative

Background/objectiveNatural history and outcomes for truncal/extremity (TE) soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is derived primarily from studies investigating all histiotypes as one homogenous cohort. We aimed to define the recurrence rate (RR), recurrence patterns, and response to radiation of TE leiomyosarcomas (LMS).MethodsPatients from the US Sarcoma Collaborative database with primary, high-grade TE STS were identified. Patients were grouped into LMS or other histology (non-LMS). Primary endpoints were locoregional recurrence-free survival (LR-RFS), distant-RFS (D-RFS), and disease specific survival (DSS).ResultsOf 1215 patients, 93 had LMS and 1122 non-LMS. In LMS patients, median age was 63 and median tumor size was 6 cm. In non-LMS patients, median age was 58 and median tumor size was 8 cm. In LMS patients, overall RR was 42% with 15% LR-RR and 29% D-RR. The 3yr LR-RFS, D-RFS, and DSS were 84%, 65%, and 76%, respectively.When considering high-risk (>5 cm and high-grade, n = 49) LMS patients, the overall RR was 45% with 12% LR-RR and 35% D-RR. 61% received radiation. The 3yr LR-RFS (78vs93%, p = 0.39), D-RFS (53vs63%, p = 0.27), and DSS (67vs91%, p = 0.17) were similar in those who did and did not receive radiation. High-risk, non-LMS patients had a similar overall RR of 42% with 15% LR-RR and 30% D-RR. 60% of non-LMS patients received radiation. There was an improved 3yr LR-RFS (82vs75%, p = 0.030) and DSS (77vs65%,p = 0.007) in non-LMS patients who received radiation.ConclusionsIn our cohort, patients with LMS have a low local recurrence rate (12–15%) and modest distant recurrence rate (29–35%). However, LMS patients had no improvement in local control or long-term outcomes with radiation. The value of radiation in these patients merits further investigation.     

Prognostic factors and outcomes of adult spermatic cord sarcoma. A study from the French Sarcoma Group

PurposeTo evaluate the outcomes of adult patients with spermatic cord sarcoma (SCS).MethodsAll consecutive patients with SCS managed by the French Sarcoma Group from 1980 to 2017 were analysed retrospectively. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was used to identify independent correlates of overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS).ResultsA total of 224 patients were recorded. The median age was 65.1 years. Forty-one (20.1%) SCSs were discovered unexpectedly during inguinal hernia surgery. The most common subtypes were liposarcoma (LPS) (73%) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (12.5%). The initial treatment was surgery for 218 (97.3%) patients. Forty-two patients (18.8%) received radiotherapy, 17 patients (7.6%) received chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 5.1 years. The median OS was 13.9 years. In MVA, OS decreased significantly with histology (HR, well-differentiated LPS versus others = 0.096; p = 0.0224), high grade (HR, 3 versus 1–2 = 2.7; p = 0.0111), previous cancer and metastasis at diagnosis (HR = 6.8; p = 0.0006). The five-year MFS was 85.9% [95% CI: 79.3–90.6]. In MVA, significant factors associated with MFS were LMS subtype (HR = 4.517; p < 10-4) and grade 3 (HR = 3.664; p < 10-3). The five-year LRFS survival rate was 67.9% [95% CI: 59.6–74.9]. In MVA, significant factors associated with local relapse were margins and wide reresection (WRR) after incomplete resection. OS was not significantly different between patients with initial R0/R1 resection and R2 patients who underwent WRR.ConclusionsUnplanned surgery affected 20.1% of SCSs. A nonreducible painless inguinal lump should suggest a sarcoma. WRR with R0 resection achieved similar OS to patients with correct surgery upfront.     

Synovial sarcoma: Do children do better?

ObjectivesSynovial sarcoma, a distinct subtype of soft tissue sarcomas (STS), is typically found in young patients. Long history of symptoms and heterogeneous clinical presentation sometimes delays diagnosis. Children have been reported to have a better prognosis than adults in some series.The main emphasis of this study was to determine differences between children and adults and to investigate prognostic factors regarding cancer specific survival (CSS).Methods248 patients treated between 1982 and 2014 at one department were included. Mean age was 37.0 years, including 43 patients <16 years. Demographic, pathology- and treatment-related information was ascertained. Median follow-up was 5.2 years.ResultsMedian duration of symptoms was 11.5 months in children and 12 months in adults (p = 0.238). Patients with a prior unplanned excision had a significantly longer duration of symptoms (p = 0.001). No difference was present between children and adults regarding tumour size, site, grade and superficial/deep location. Treatment was with surgical excision and (usually) adjuvant radiotherapy but five patients received preoperative radiotherapy and 43 patients chemotherapy. In patients treated with curative intent, five-year CSS rates were 75.5% for adults and 89.0% for children, with 10-year CSS rates of 56.1% and 82.2% (p = 0.026).In multivariate analysis, large tumour size (p < 0.005) and patient age (p = 0.024) were associated with worse CSS, irrespective of tumour location and site.ConclusionClinical presentation of synovial sarcoma is similar in children and adults, with no significant difference in tumour size, site, grade or location. Small tumour size and young patient age are independent positive prognostic factors influencing CSS.     

Significance of intraoperative radiation therapy and high cumulative radiation doses in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma

IntroductionIn retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) local recurrence (LR) rates remain high despite more aggressive surgical approaches. Since wide resection margins cannot be achieved in all patients, application of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been frequently discussed. Still, the significance of IORT in multimodal treatment of retroperitoneal STS remains unclear.Material and methodsPatients undergoing resection of primary or recurrent retroperitoneal STS at the University of Heidelberg Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate Kaplan-Meyer and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of LR-free survival and to investigate the impact of IORT and high cumulative radiation doses. Analyses with propensity-score matched subgroups for IORT and cumulative radiation dose were performed to control for selection bias. Subgroup analyses for patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma were likewise performed.Results272 patients were identified. Recurrent tumors, histology of dedifferentiated liposarcoma or unclassified sarcoma and microscopically incomplete resection were associated with decreased LR-free survival. In liposarcoma, only recurrent and dedifferentiated tumors were confirmed as poor prognostic factors concerning LR. IORT and cumulative radiation doses exceeding 60 Gy did not influence LR rates (estimated 5-year LR-free survival: IORT: 39%, non-IORT: 46%; p = 0.79).ConclusionIn this retrospective evaluation, additional application of IORT does not significantly influence oncological outcome in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma. Randomized trials are needed to clarify the benefit of IORT.     

Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities

PurposeRadiation therapy is a standard part of limb conserving therapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at high risk of recurrence. Toxic effects increase with radiation dose and volume of normal tissue irradiated. This study sought to compare dosimetry of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to investigate the optimal planning technique.Methods and MaterialsTwenty patients with extremity STS who underwent preoperative radiation therapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions) between 2016 and 2020 at a specialised sarcoma center were included. The original treatment techniques were sliding window IMRT or 3-dimensional conformal. VMAT plans were retrospectively generated according to the original tumor and organ-at-risk constraints. Quality assurance was performed as per departmental protocol. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare dosimetric parameters (for planning target volume [PTV], in-field bone, and soft tissue structures), monitor units (MUs), and treatment time.ResultsMedian patient age was 65 years and the majority were male (n = 14, 70%). The most common subtype was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 14, 70%), and most tumors were located on the thigh (n = 12, 60%). Median PTV was 1110 cm³ and median volume of in-field bone 236 cm³. VMAT plans had significantly lower average MU (480 vs 862 MU, P < .001) and overall treatment time (300 vs 153 seconds, P < .001). PTV coverage favored VMAT, with marginally higher mean, minimum, and maximum doses and higher conformity index. However, differences were not statistically significant. Dose to infield bone and soft tissue structures were similar or slightly lower with VMAT.ConclusionsIn extremity STS, VMAT plans demonstrated a favorable trend toward tumor coverage and dose conformity compared with IMRT along with significantly lower MUs and half the overall treatment time.     

Surgical site complications of isolated salvage neck dissection post-radiotherapy and post-chemoradiotherapy – A cohort analysis (1997–2017)

IntroductionThis study aims to quantify surgical site complications (SSC) after isolated salvage neck dissection (ND) compared with primary ND.Patients and methodsBetween 1997 and 2017 in the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, a total of 323 isolated NDs were performed in 308 patients: primary ND (n = 144), post-radiotherapy (RT) ND (n = 53) and post-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) ND (n = 126). Patient, tumor and therapy characteristics were recorded. SSCs were scored according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC).Results101 NDs (31%) were complicated by at least one SSC. In total, 189 different SSCs occurred. Translated to CDC, 45 complications were grade 2, 25 grade 3a and 31 grade 3b. No significant difference in occurrence of SSC (CDC >1) was found between all groups. However, post-CRT, selective (SND) and modified radical ND and radical ND (MRND/RND) (p = 0.005), resection of sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) (p = 0.039) and duration of super selective ND surgery (p = 0.048) were significantly associated with more SSC. SCM muscle removal was associated with more surgical site infection (p = 0.045) and necrosis (p = 0.036). From week 10 post-RT/CRT, no difference in complication frequency with primary ND was seen.ConclusionPost-CRT SND, MRND/RND and SCM muscle resection were associated with an increased incidence of SSCs. If oncologically possible, limit the extent of ND and when an MRND is inevitable, preserve the SCM muscle for optimal prevention of SSC. Concerning SSC, optimal timing of salvage ND is minimal 10 weeks after RT/CRT.     

Impact of histological subtype on radiological and pathological response after neoadjuvant radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma

BackgroundEvaluation of response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NART) does not consider soft tissue sarcoma (STS) heterogeneity. We aimed to investigate radiological and pathological response of 4 major histotypes.MethodsExtremity or trunk STS patients who received 50 Gy NART between 2009 and 2020 were retrospectively included. Relative variation in tumor size (RVTS) and pathological response were reported in the overall population and in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), myxofibrosarcoma (MFS), myxoid liposarcoma (MLS) and synovial sarcoma (SS) patients to identify response modalities of each histotype.ResultsAmong the 121 included patients, 49, 19, 13 and 11 presented UPS, MFS, MLS and SS. Median RVTS were 0% (IQR -18-+18), +8% (IQR 0-+24), −12% (IQR -20–3) and −11% (IQR -15–9), respectively (p = 0.001). Median viable cells were 10%, 60%, 20% and 70% (p = 0.007). In overall population, pathological complete response and median necrosis were 27.7% and 10% without significant correlation to histotype (p = 0.18 and 0.06). Nineteen (38.8%) UPS specimens presented cysts that were emptied during the sampling process and distorted the microscopic response evaluation. Infiltrative growth pattern was observed in 28% and 38.9% UPS and MFS patients. Five (38.5%) MLS presented mature adipocytes without proven prognostic value. Cysts were observed in 36% of SS specimens. In the absence of initial tumor limits, the great viable cellularity of SS may be overestimated by their nodular aspect.ConclusionAfter NART, we highlighted disparate response of UPS, frequent progression of MFS, and confirmed MLS and SS radiosensitivity. Response must be interpreted with caution and consider the histotype-specific patterns.     

The impact of postoperative radiological surveillance intensity on disease free and overall survival from primary retroperitoneal,abdominal and pelvic soft-tissue sarcoma

AimThis observational study aimed to evaluate the impact of intensity of radiological surveillance on survival following resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma.MethodRetrospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary resection of soft tissue sarcoma arising in the retroperitoneum, abdomen or pelvis at a single, high-volume sarcoma centre. Intensity of follow-up regimes up to 5 postoperative years were categorized as ‘European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) compliant’ (intense), or ‘non-ESMO compliant’ (less-intense). The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome measures were disease-free survival (DFS) and reoperation rate. Analyses were stratified by high (grade 2 or 3) or low (grade 1) tumour grade.ResultsOf 168 patients, 67.1% had high-grade and 32.9% had low-grade disease. Overall, 40.0% of patients had ESMO-compliant radiological follow-up (high-grade:25.7%, low-grade:66.7%). 41.7% of patients died and 48.2% suffered local or distant recurrence by cessation of follow up. Upon univariable analysis for high-grade tumours, ESMO compliance reduced DFS (p = 0.066) but had no impact on OS. There was no significant difference in the reoperation rate in patients with ESMO-compliant and non-compliant follow-up (p = 0.097). In low-grade tumours, ESMO compliance significantly reduced DFS (p < 0.001), but without effecting OS. In risk-adjusted models for high-grade tumours, ESMO compliant follow-up was associated with reduced OS (HR:3.47, 1.40–8.61, p = 0.007) and no difference in DFS. In low-grade tumours, there was no association between overall ESMO compliance and OS or DFS.ConclusionThis study did not find a benefit for high-intensity radiological surveillance and overall survival in patients undergoing primary resection for high or low-grade retroperitoneal sarcoma.     

Benefits of Homeopathic Complementary Treatment in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on the French Nationwide Healthcare Database

BackgroundComplementary therapy in oncology aims to help patients better cope with the illness and side effects (SEs) of cancer treatments that affect their quality of life (QOL). This study aimed to assess the benefits of homeopathic treatment on the health-related QOL (HRQOL) of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) prescribed in postsurgical complementary therapy.Patients and MethodsAn extraction from the French nationwide healthcare database targeted all patients who underwent mastectomy for newly diagnosed BC between 2012 and 2013. HRQOL was proxied by the quantity of medication used to palliate the SEs of cancer treatments.ResultsA total of 98,009 patients were included (mean age: 61 ± 13 years). Homeopathy was used in 11%, 26%, and 22% of patients respectively during the 7 to 12 months before surgery, the 6 months before, and 6 months after. Thereafter, the use remained stable at 15% for 4 years. Six months after surgery, there was a significant overall decrease (RR = 0.88, confidence interval (CI)₉₅ = 0.87-0.89) in the dispensing of medication associated with SEs in patients treated with ≥ 3 dispensing of homeopathy compared to none. The decrease appeared to be greater for immunostimulants (RR = 0.79, (CI)₉₅ = 0.74-0.84), corticosteroids (RR = 0.82, (CI)₉₅ = 0.79-0.85), and antidiarrheals (RR = 0.83, (CI)₉₅ = 0.77-0.88).ConclusionThe study showed an increasing use of homeopathy in patients with BC following diagnosis. This use was maintained after surgery and seemed to play a role in helping patients to better tolerate the SEs of cancer treatments.     

Surgical and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for stage I high-grade endometrial cancer

ObjectiveTo evaluate the prevalence and outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for stage I high grade endometrial cancer. We hypothesized that route of surgery is not associated with survival.MaterialsPatients diagnosed between 2010 and 2014, with stage I grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell and carcinosarcoma endometrial carcinoma, who underwent hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy were drawn from the National Cancer Database. Patients converted to open surgery were excluded. Overall survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for confounders.ResultsA total of 12852 patients were identified. The rate of minimally invasive surgery was 62.2%. An increase in the use between 2010 and 2014 was noted (p < 0.001). Open surgery was associated with longer hospital stay (median 3 vs 1 day, p < 0.001), higher 30-day unplanned re-admission rate (4.5% vs 2.4%, p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (0.6% vs 0.3%, p = 0.008). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who had open or minimally invasive surgery, p = 0.22; 3-yr overall survival rates were 83.7% and 84.4% respectively. After controlling for patient age, tumor histology, substage, type of insurance, type of reporting facility, receipt of radiation therapy and chemotherapy, extent of lymphadenectomy, the presence of comorbidities and personal history of another tumor, minimally invasive surgery was not associated with a worse survival (hazard ratio: 1.06, 95% confidence interval: 0.97, 1.15).ConclusionsMinimally invasive surgery for patients with stage I high grade endometrial cancer, was associated with superior short-term outcomes with no difference in overall survival noted.     

Oncological outcome,functional results and costs after unplanned excision of musculoskeletal soft tissue sarcoma

BackgroundTreatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) should only be initiated once the diagnosis is fully established. Resection of tumors of unknown nature should be avoided. Nevertheless, specialized centers continue to face numbers of unplanned excisions (UPE) in STS.AimTo compare oncologic and functional outcomes, number of surgeries, length of hospital stay and treatment costs of UPE versus planned excision (PE) in STS.MethodA retrospective single tertiary center study was performed on 201 patients. Survival, local and distant recurrence rates were compared between PE (n = 137) and UPE (n = 64). In a subgroup analysis of 60 patients, functional outcome (MSTS and TESS scores), and socio-economic impact (number of surgeries, length of hospital stay and treatment costs) in “functional planned excision” (fPE) group (n = 30) and “functional unplanned excision” (fUPE) group (n = 29) were compared.ResultsThere was no significant difference in oncological outcome between PE and UPE. In the subgroup analysis, we found a non-significant difference in functional outcome. Patients in the fUPE had significantly more surgeries (3.5 vs. 1.4; p < 0.00001) and costs of their management was 64% higher than fPE (p = 0.048). Hospital stay was longer after fUPE but not statistically significant (18.3 days vs. 11.8 days; p = 0.13).ConclusionEven though oncological and functional outcomes are comparable after PE and UPE of STS, the number of surgeries, length of hospital stay and treatment costs were higher in patients with UPE. Our data underscore the importance of specialized STS treatment centers including multidisciplinary management.     

Tumescent technique versus electrocautery mastectomy: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundBreast cancer is the most common cancer in Danish women. In 2016 about 1450 (31%) Danish breast cancer patients had a mastectomy.The aim was to compare the frequency of postoperative complications in two methods of surgery, electrocautery dissection and tumescent technique, when performing a mastectomy.MethodsOpen randomized controlled trial of all consecutive primary breast cancer or DCIS female patients who underwent either a simple mastectomy or a modified radical mastectomy in Vejle Hospital, from January 2012 to October 2017.Primary outcomes were seroma production, bleeding, infection and necrosis.Secondary outcomes were duration of surgery and delay of adjuvant treatment caused by complications.Categorical outcome variables were compared between randomization groups using chi-square of Fisher exact test and continuous outcome variables by using Wilcoxon rank test. All analyses were performed at a 5% two-sided significance level.Results357 patients met the inclusion criteria. 14 had bilateral mastectomy, i.e. 371 breasts. The two randomization groups consisted of 105 patients/107 breasts operated by tumescent technique and 98 patients/102 breasts operated by electrocautery technique.Tumescent technique produced more seroma though not significant (p = 0.631) (mean 605 vs. 630 ml). Bleeding in the tumescent group was 10.3% vs. 5.9% in the electrocautery group (p = 0.245).Infection (5.9% vs. 7.5% p = 0.645) and necrosis (4.9% vs. 4.7% p = 0.938) was uncommon with no difference between the intervention groups.Infection was most common cause of delay of adjuvant treatment; 3.9% in the electrocautery technique group.No significant difference in duration of surgery (p = 0.392).ConclusionBoth techniques are equally safe for simple and modified radical mastectomy.     

Examining patient perspectives on sarcoma surveillance: The Sarcoma Surveillance Survey

ObjectivesThe optimal frequency and modality of sarcoma surveillance imaging are uncertain, and current practices vary substantially. While efforts to develop evidence-based guidelines are ongoing, patient perspectives regarding surveillance imaging have not been reported. The primary goal of this study was to pilot the novel Sarcoma Surveillance Survey to assess patient concerns regarding sarcoma surveillance.MethodsIn this single-center, cross-sectional study, patients receiving surveillance imaging after surgical sarcoma treatment were administered the 10-item Sarcoma Surveillance Survey, the validated Appraisal Scale, measuring positive and negative emotional reactions to imaging, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Short Form 8a as a measure of anxiety.ResultsPatients expressed highest levels of concern about cost and radiation exposure associated with surveillance, and most (87.6%) did not express a preference for more or less frequent imaging. Younger patients and those living further away from the imaging center were more concerned about cost of surveillance. Female patients had higher levels of concern compared to males regarding radiation, IV contrast, and overall levels of concern about surveillance. Higher levels of anxiety were correlated with preference for more frequent imaging (r_s = 0.274, p = 0.027) and higher overall level of concern about surveillance (r_s = 0.259, p = 0.037). Higher negative appraisal scores were also correlated with higher overall concerns (r_s = 0.323; p = 0.012).ConclusionsPatient perspectives should be considered when developing sarcoma surveillance strategies. Identifying patients with greater anxiety and concerns regarding imaging may create opportunities for improved surveillance practices as well as counseling and survivorship interventions.     

Evaluation of sarcopenia biomarkers in older patients undergoing major surgery for digestive cancer. SAXO prospective cohort study

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate different biomarkers to identify the most reliable for anticipating complications after major abdominal surgery for digestive cancer in older patients and compare their performance to the existing definition and screening algorithm of sarcopenia from EWGSOP.MethodsNinety-five consecutive patients aged over 65 years who underwent elective surgery for digestive cancer were prospectively included in the SAXO study. Sarcopenia was defined according to EWGSOP criteria (four level from no sarcopenia to severe sarcopenia). Strength and physical performance were evaluated with the handgrip test (HGT) and gait speed test (GST), respectively. CT scan analysis was used to calculate the skeletal muscle index (SMI), intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Measures were adjusted to body mass index (BMI). Complication grading was performed using the Clavien?Dindo classification. A doubly robust estimator with multivariable regression was used to limit bias.ResultsSixteen patients presented with sarcopenia. Adjusted to BMI, sarcopenic patients had an increased IMAT^BMI (0.35 vs. 0.22; p = 0.003) and increased VAT^BMI (7.85 vs. 6.13; p = 0.048). In multivariable analysis, IMAT was an independent risk factor for minor and severe complications (OR = 1.298; 95% CI [1.031: 1.635] p = 0.027), while an increased SAT area was a protective factor (OR = 0.982; 95% CI [0.969: 0.995] p = 0.007). Twenty-two patients were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m²). While no association was observed between obesity and sarcopenia (according to EWGSOP definition), obese patients had increased IMAT^BMI (0.31 vs. 0.23; p = 0.010) and VAT^BMI (8.40 vs. 6.49; p = 0.019). The combination of SAT, VAT and IMAT performed well to anticipate severe complication (AUC = 0.759) while AUC of EWGSOP 2010 and 2019 algorithm were 0.660 and 0.519, respectively.DiscussionNon-invasive and imaging related measures of IMAT, SAT and VAT seems to be valuable tools to refine risk-assessment of older patients in surgery and specially to detect myosteatosis in obese ones.