Intracranial hemorrhage in anticoagulated patients with mild traumatic brain injury: significant differences between direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists

Prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) is uncertain. We evaluated the rate of immediate and delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) comparing vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and the safety of a clinical management protocol. In this single-center prospective observational study, we enrolled 220 patients on OAT with MTBI. After a first negative CT scan, asymptomatic patients underwent a close neurological observation; if neurologically stable, they were discharged without a second CT scan and followed up for 1 month. Out of the 220 patients, 206 met the inclusion criteria. 23 of them (11.2%) had a positive first CT scan for ICH. Only 1 (0.5%, 95% CI 0.0–1.4%) died because of ICH; no one required neurosurgical intervention. The observed prevalence rate of immediate ICH resulted statistically higher in VKAs-treated patients compared to those treated with DOACs (15.7 vs. 4.7%, RR 3.34, 95% CI 1.18–9.46, P?<?0.05). In the 1-month follow-up, 5 out of the 183 patients with a negative CT scan were lost. Out of the remaining 178 patients, only 3 showed a delayed ICH (1.7%, 95% CI 0.0–3.6%), 1 of them died (0.6%, 95% CI 0.5–1.7%) and the others did not require neurosurgical intervention. DOACs resulted safer than VKAs also in the setting of MTBI. In our observation, the rate of delayed hemorrhage was relatively low. Patients presenting with a negative first CT scan and without neurological deterioration could be safely discharged after a short period of in-ward observation with a low rate of complications and without a second CT scan.     

TAVR Patients Requiring Anticoagulation: Direct Oral Anticoagulant or Vitamin K Antagonist?

ObjectivesUsing French transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) registries linked with the nationwide administrative databases, the study compared the rates of long-term mortality, bleeding, and ischemic events after TAVR in patients requiring oral anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).BackgroundThe choice of optimal drug for anticoagulation after TAVR remains debated.MethodsData from the France-TAVI and FRANCE-2 registries were linked to the French national health single-payer claims database, from 2010 to 2017. Propensity score matching was used to reduce treatment-selection bias. Two primary endpoints were death from any cause (efficacy) and major bleeding (safety).ResultsA total of 24,581 patients who underwent TAVR were included and 8,962 (36.4%) were treated with OAC. Among anticoagulated patients, 2,180 (24.3%) were on DOACs. After propensity matching, at 3 years, mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.67; P < 0.005) and major bleeding including hemorrhagic stroke (HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.17-2.29; P < 0.005) were lower in patients on DOACs compared with those on VKAs. The rates of ischemic stroke (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.81-2.15; P = 0.27) and acute coronary syndrome (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.68-1.99; P = 0.57) did not differ among groups.ConclusionsIn these large multicenter French TAVR registries with an exhaustive clinical follow-up, the long-term mortality and major bleeding were lower with DOACs than VKAs at discharge. The present study supports preferential use of DOACs rather than VKAs in patients requiring oral anticoagulation therapy after TAVR.     

Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Octogenarians with Venous Thromboembolism: An International Multidatabase Cohort Study

BackgroundThe effects of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among octogenarian patients with venous thromboembolism remains poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, our study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) among octogenarians with venous thromboembolism.MethodsWe conducted an international cohort study using administrative health care databases from Québec, Canada, and Germany. We assembled 2 population-based cohorts of octogenarians with incident venous thromboembolism initiating treatment with DOACs or VKAs. The study period spanned from January 2012 to the most recent date of data availability (Québec: December 2016; Germany: December 2019). Using an as-treated exposure definition, we compared use of DOACs to use of VKAs, applying inverse probability of treatment weighting based on high-dimensional propensity scores to balance exposure groups. Cox proportional hazards models estimated site-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. The results were meta-analyzed using random-effects models.ResultsOverall, our study included 6737 octogenarians with venous thromboembolism (Québec: n = 2556; Germany: n = 4181) who initiated use of DOACs (n = 3778) or VKAs (n = 2959). When compared to VKAs, DOACs were associated with similar risks of recurrent venous thromboembolism (weighted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.43-1.46; I² = 0.00), major bleeding (weighted HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57-1.63; I² = 0.59), and all-cause mortality (weighted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.81-1.34; I² = 0.00).ConclusionsAmong octogenarians with venous thromboembolism, DOACs showed a comparable effectiveness and safety compared to VKAs. Our results support the use of DOACs in this high-risk group.     

Long-term outcome and risk factors associated with events in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulants: The ASSAF-K registry

BackgroundOral anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) has changed dramatically. Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy is administered by general practitioners and specialists. However, the beneficial long-term effects and safety of DOACs have not been well investigated in real-world clinical practice.MethodsThe ASSAF-K (a study of the safety and efficacy of OAC therapy in the treatment of AF in Kanagawa), a prospective, multi-center, observational study, was conducted to clarify patient characteristics, status of OAC treatment, long-term outcomes, and adverse events, including cerebrovascular disease, bleeding, and death.ResultsA total of 4014 patients were enrolled (hospital: 2500 cases; clinic: 1514 cases). The number of patients in the final dataset was 3367 (mean age, 72.6 ± 10.0 years; males, 66.3 %). CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 3.0 ± 1.6 and 2.2 ± 1.0, respectively. The risk factors of the primary composite outcome (all-cause death, serious bleeding events, cerebral hemorrhage, and stroke) were higher age, lower body mass index, lower diastolic blood pressure, lower creatine clearance, history of heart failure, history of stroke, and medication of anti-platelet agents. The event-free rates of the primary composite outcome with DOACs, warfarin, and without OACs were 92.7 %, 88.0 %, and 87.4 %, respectively. The event rate of DOACs was significantly lower than that of warfarin [HR 0.63 (95 % CI 0.48–0.81)], and similar results were observed after adjustment for AF stroke risk score [HR 0.70 (95 % CI 0.54–0.90)]. Serious bleeding events tended to occur less frequently with DOACs compared with warfarin [unadjusted HR 0.53 (95 % CI 0.31–0.91), adjusted HR 0.61 (95 % CI 0.33–1.11)].ConclusionsThis multi-center registry demonstrated the long-term outcome in patients with AF treated with and without OACs and suggests that DOAC therapy is safe and beneficial in hospitals and clinics.     

Real-world use of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in atrial fibrillation patients with liver disease: A meta-analysis

Several studies have investigated the effectiveness and safety of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and liver disease. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the effect of NOACs with VKAs in patients with AF and liver disease. We also conducted a subsidiary analysis to compare the risk of liver injury between NOACs and VKA in AF patients. We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases from January 2009 to May 2020 for the relevant studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were selected and pooled using a random-effects model. A total of six cohorts were included. Compared with VKA use, the use of NOACs was associated with reduced risks of stroke or systemic embolism (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.93), all-cause death (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63-0.75), and intracranial bleeding (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40-0.59), whereas the outcomes of major bleeding (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.51-1.01) and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.51-1.36) were not significantly different between groups in AF patients with liver disease. Moreover, compared with VKA use, the use of NOACs was associated with a reduced risk of liver injury (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.84) in AF patients. Compared with VKAs, the use of NOACs was associated with reduced risks of stroke or systemic embolism, all-cause death, and intracranial bleeding in AF patients with liver disease, and associated with a reduced risk of liver injury in AF patients.     

Impact of renal function in high bleeding risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a patient-level stratified analysis from four post-approval studies

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended as first-line anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in patients with cancer and AF the efficacy and safety of DOACs are not well established.

Objective

We performed a meta-analysis comparing available data regarding the efficacy and safety of DOACs vs vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in cancer patients with non-valvular AF.

Methods

An online search of Pubmed and EMBASE libraries (from inception to May, 1 2020) was performed, in addition to manual screening. Nine studies were considered eligible for the meta-analysis involving 46,424 DOACs users and 182,797 VKA users.

Results

The use of DOACs was associated with reduced risks of systemic embolism or any stroke (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.52–0.81; p 0.001), ischemic stroke (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74–0.95; p 0.007) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.52–0.71; p 0.00001) as compared to VKA group. DOAC use was associated with significantly reduced risks of major bleeding (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50–0.92; p 0.01) and intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.47–0.88; p 0.006). Compared to VKA, DOACs provided a non-statistically significant risk reduction of the outcomes major bleeding or non-major clinically relevant bleeding (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.78–1.13; p 0.50) and any bleeding (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.78–1.06; p 0.24).

Conclusions

In comparison to VKA, DOACs were associated with a significant reduction of the rates of thromboembolic events and major bleeding complications in patients with AF and cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.

     

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in antiphospholipid syndrome: A meta-analysis.

BackgroundAnticoagulant treatment is recommended in patients with thrombosis and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Conflicting results have been reported on the role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in these patients. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on this issue.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for RCTs comparing DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for secondary thromboprophylaxis in patients with thrombotic APS. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of DOACs compared to VKAs to prevent recurrence of thromboembolic events. Risk difference (RD) was reported as weighted RD according to Mantel-Haenszel random-effect method.ResultsThree RCTs (426 patients) were included, all comparing rivaroxaban with VKAs. The proportion of recurrences (either arterial or venous) was higher among rivaroxaban patients when compared with those receiving VKAs (9.5% vs 2.8%; RD 6%, 95% CI, -0.05 – 0.18, p=0.29), although non-statistically significant. In patients with an arterial index event, thromboembolic recurrences were more frequent in those treated with rivaroxaban compared to those treated with VKAs (25% vs 6.2%; RD 19%, 95% CI, 0.04 – 0.33; p =0.01; I² 49%). In triple aPL positive patients, rivaroxaban showed higher rates of thromboembolic recurrences compared with VKAs (12% vs 3%; RD 9%, 95% CI, 0.02 – 0.15; p= 0.01; I² 13%). Non-statistically significant differences were observed in major bleeding events or mortality.ConclusionsThe use of rivaroxaban in APS patients is associated with an increased rate of thromboembolic recurrences compared to VKAs, at least in those with arterial index event or triple aPL positivity.     

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist initiation during admission is associated with improved outcomes irrespective of ejection fraction in patients with acute heart failure

Aims

Heart failure (HF) guidelines recommend initiation and optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy, including mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), before hospital discharge. However, scientific evidence for this recommendation is lacking. Our objective was to determine whether initiation of MRA prior to hospital discharge is associated with improved outcomes.

Methods and results

We performed a secondary analysis of 6197 patients enrolled in the RELAX-AHF-2 study. Patients were divided into four groups according to MRA therapy at baseline and discharge. At baseline 30% of patients received MRA therapy, which increased to 50% of patients at discharge. In-hospital initiation of an MRA was observed in 1690 (27%) patients, 1438 (23%) patients remained on MRA therapy, 418 (7%) patients discontinued MRA treatment, and 2651 (43%) patients did not receive an MRA during hospital stay. Compared with patients who did not receive MRA therapy, in-hospital initiation of an MRA was independently associated with lower risks of mortality (multivariable hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.96; p = 0.02), cardiovascular death (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.59–1.01; p = 0.06), hospitalization for HF or renal failure (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60–0.86; p = 0.0003) and the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death and/or rehospitalization for HF or renal failure (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61–0.83; p < 0.0001) at 180 days. These results were independent of baseline left ventricular ejection fraction.

Conclusion

In patients hospitalized for acute HF, in-hospital initiation of an MRA was associated with improved post-discharge outcomes, independent of left ventricular ejection fraction and other potential confounders.     

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Low Body Weight

Background

It is unclear whether the overall effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are consistent in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and extremely low body weight (<50 kg).

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Liver Disease

BackgroundAdvanced liver disease is known to increase the risk for bleeding and affects the hepatic clearance and metabolism of drugs. Subjects with active liver disease were excluded from pivotal clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), so the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with liver disease is lacking.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare DOACs with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and liver disease.MethodsUsing the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, subjects with atrial fibrillation and active liver disease treated with oral anticoagulation were included (12,778 with warfarin and 24,575 with DOACs), and analyzed ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, major bleeding, all-cause death, and the composite outcome. Propensity score weighting was used to balance covariates between the 2 groups.ResultsDOACs were associated with lower risks for ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.548; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.485 to 0.618), intracranial hemorrhage (HR: 0.479; 95% CI 0.394 to 0.581), gastrointestinal bleeding (HR: 0.819; 95% CI: 0.619 to 0.949), major bleeding (HR: 0.650; 95% CI: 0.575 to 0.736), all-cause death (HR: 0.698; 95% CI: 0.636 to 0.765), and the composite outcome (HR: 0.610; 95% CI: 0.567 to 0.656) than warfarin. Among the total study population, 13% of patients (n = 4,942) were identified as having significant active liver disease. A consistent benefit was observed in patients with significant active liver disease (HR for the composite outcome: 0.691; 95% CI: 0.577 to 0.827).ConclusionsIn this large Asian population with atrial fibrillation and liver disease, DOACs showed better effectiveness and safety than warfarin, which was consistent in those with significant active liver disease.     

Incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients with newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: An Asian multicenter retrospective cohort study in Singapore

Background

Real‐world effectiveness and safety of antithrombotics in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients in Singapore has not been thoroughly studied.

Hypothesis.

Users of various antithrombotics experience a significantly different risk of stroke and major bleed compared with warfarin users.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients age ≥ 21 years newly diagnosed with NVAF between July 2012 and September 2015. Using electronic medical records, data on patients' demographics, antithrombotics prescribed, and CHA₂DS₂‐VASc and HAS‐BLED risk factors were collected. Patients were followed for 1 year from diagnosis for the primary effectiveness and safety endpoints of incident stroke or systemic embolism and major bleed, respectively. The secondary safety endpoint was overall bleed. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined from Cox regression.

Results

Of 743 patients included, 224 were on warfarin, 156 on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), 277 on single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), 28 on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and 58 on no therapy. Mean age (±SD) was 68.7 ± 13.0 years. Compared with warfarin users, SAPT (adjusted [adj.] HR: 3.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21‐11.3) and DAPT users (adj. HR: 10.1, 95% CI: 1.51‐67.2) were more likely to develop thromboembolic outcomes. Also, DOAC users (adj. HR: 0.304, 95% CI: 0.158‐0.585), SAPT users (adj. HR: 0.142, 95% CI: 0.0680‐0.295), and DAPT users (adj. HR: 0.112, 95% CI: 0.0146‐0.857) were less likely to experience any bleed compared with warfarin users.

Conclusions

SAPT and DAPT are less effective than warfarin in NVAF patients. DOACs may be considered in view of lower risk of overall bleed.

     

Direct oral anti-coagulants compared to vitamin-K antagonists in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis

Pharmacological or electrical cardioversion allows immediate symptoms improvement in the setting of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), although the periprocedural risk of systemic embolism should be considered. Recently, there was a great interest on the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) when used for the cardioversion of non-valvular AF. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of patients undergoing both electrical and pharmacologic cardioversion for non-valvular AF in the RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE, ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, X-VeRT, ENSURE-AF, and EMANATE trials. We assessed Mantel–Haenszel pooled estimates of risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for stroke/systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleeding (MB) at follow-up. A total of 8564 patients have been included in the analysis. When compared with patients receiving vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs), patients receiving DOACs had a lower risk of SSE (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.33–1.546, P?=?0.34), as well as of MB (RR 0.86;,95% CI 0.47–1.58, P?=?0.62), although both were non-significant. Funnel plot analysis showed, however, lower RRs with more recent ad hoc studies in comparison with registrational studies, even though statistical significance was not reached. DOACs are as effective and as safe as VKAs for thromboembolic prevention in non-valvular AF in the setting of cardioversion. There are differences, although non-significant, between registrational studies and studies enrolling exclusively patients undergoing cardioversion of AF.     

Intracranial haemorrhage in the Italian population of haemophilia patients with and without inhibitors

Summary. Intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) is the most serious bleeding symptom in haemophiliacs, resulting in high rates of mortality and disabling sequelae. The Association of Italian Haemophilia Centres carried out a retrospective survey (1987–2008) of ICH occurring in haemophiliacs with the goals to establish: (i) incidence, location of bleeding, death rate and disabling sequels; (ii) risk factors for ICH; and (iii) treatment used during the acute phase of ICH and for recurrence prevention. A total of 112 ICH episodes had occurred in 88 patients (78 haemophilia A, 10 haemophilia B), 24 of whom experienced recurrences. The cumulative hazard of ICH for the whole cohort over the entire follow‐up period was 26.7 per 1000 patients, and the annualized rate of ICH was 2.50 events per 1000 patients (95% CI 1.90–3.31). The risk of ICH was higher in the youngest children (24.4 per 1000, 95% CI 12.7–47.0 in the first year of age and 14.9, 95% CI 7.1–31.4 in the second year of age) and then progressively rose again after the age of 40. Univariate, bivariate (age‐adjusted) and multivariate analysis investigating the effects of patient characteristics on ICH occurrence showed that haemophilia severity and inhibitor status were strongly associated with ICH [severe vs. mild, HR 3.96 (2.39–6.57); inhibitor vs. non‐inhibitor 2.52 (1.46–4.35)]. HCV infection was also associated with the risk of ICH [HR 1.83 (1.25–2.69)]. Therapeutic suggestions based upon our experience to control ICH recurrence are provided.     

Concomitant Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants with Antiplatelet Agents and the Risk of Major Bleeding in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Purpose

Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation commonly have comorbidities requiring concurrent use of oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets. There are no real-world data on the comparative safety of concomitant antithrombotic treatments in the era of direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs). Thus, we compared the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, and other major bleeding between concomitant DOAC-antiplatelet use and concomitant vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-antiplatelet use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Effect of non‐recommended doses versus recommended doses of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients: A meta‐analysis

BackgroundSeveral observational studies have shown that the inappropriate dosing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) that does not conform to recommendations is becoming a widespread phenomenon. Therefore, we performed a meta‐analysis and systematic review to assess the effect of non‐recommended doses versus recommended doses of DOACs on the effectiveness and safety outcomes among AF patients.MethodsThe PubMed and Ovid databases were systematically searched to identify the relevant studies until December 2020. The effect estimates were hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), which were pooled using a fixed‐effects model (I² ≤ 50%) or a random‐effects model (I² > 50%).ResultsA total of 11 studies were included in this meta‐analysis. Compared with recommended dosing of DOACs, non‐recommended low dosing of DOACs was associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE, HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.12–1.49) and all‐cause death (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.15–1.62), but not the ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and major bleeding. Compared with recommended dosing of DOACs, non‐recommended high dosing of DOACs was associated with increased risks of SSE (HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.01–2.04), major bleeding (HR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.48–2.68), and all‐cause death(HR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.02–1.87).ConclusionCompared with recommended dosing of DOACs, non‐recommended low dosing of DOACs was associated with increased risks of SSE and all‐cause death. Further study should confirm the findings of non‐recommended high dosing versus recommended dosing of DOACs.     

Predictors of in-hospital mortality and attributable risks of death after ischemic stroke: the German Stroke Registers Study Group

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of information about factors associated with in-hospital death and the impact of neurological complications on early outcome for patients with stroke treated in community settings. We investigated predictors for in-hospital mortality and attributable risks of death after ischemic stroke in a pooled analysis of large German stroke registers. METHODS: Stroke patients admitted to hospitals cooperating within the German Stroke Registers Study Group (ADSR) between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2000, were analyzed. The ADSR is a network of regional stroke registers, combining data from 104 academic and community hospitals throughout Germany. The impact of patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, their comorbid conditions, and the treating hospital expertise in stroke care on in-hospital mortality was analyzed using Cox regression analysis. Attributable risks of death for medical and neurological complications were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 13 440 ischemic stroke patients were included. Overall in-hospital mortality was 4.9%. In women, higher age (P<.001), severity of stroke defined by number of neurological deficits (P<.001), and atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.6) were independent predictors for in-hospital death. In men, diabetes (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8) and previous stroke (HR 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9) had a significant negative impact on early outcome in addition to the factors identified for women. The complication with the highest attributable risk proportion was increased intracranial pressure, accounting for 94% (95% CI, 93.9%-94.1%) of deaths among patients with this complication. Pneumonia was the complication with the highest attributable proportion of death in the entire stroke population, accounting for 31.2% (95% CI, 30.9%-31.5%) of all deaths. More than 50% of all in-hospital deaths were caused by serious medical or neurological complications (54.4%; 95% CI, 54.3%-54.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial differences were found in the impact of comorbid conditions on early outcome for men and women. Programs aiming at an improvement in short-term outcome after stroke should focus especially on a reduction of pneumonia and an early treatment of increased intracranial pressure.     

Anticoagulation resumption after intracranial hemorrhage in patients treated with VKA and DOACs

BackgroundIntracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with severe prognosis and recurrent risk. This impacts on the decision to resume anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients. Purpose of our study is to evaluate the incidence rate of recurrent ICH in patients with AF or VTE resuming anticoagulation after a first ICH episode.MethodsWe report data of two cohorts of AF or VTE after a first ICH. The Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) cohort (166 patients) derives from CHIRONE Study, the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) cohort (178 patients) derives from START2-RegisterResultsThe clinical characteristics of the two cohort are similar with the exception of more prevalence of history of previous stroke/TIA in DOAC patients with respect to VKA (p = 0.02) and serum creatinine levels>1.5 mg/dL in VKA patients with respect to DOAC(p = 0.0001). The index ICH was spontaneous in 66.4% and in 33.7% among DOAC and VKAs cohort respectively (p = 0.0001). During follow-up, 14 recurrent ICH were recorded; 9 (rate 2.5 × 100 patient-years) in VKA and 5 (rate 1.3 × 100 patient-years) in DOAC (Relative Risk 1.9; 95% CI 0.6–7.4; p = 0.2). The univariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with recurrent ICH were more frequently males, hypertensive, with a history of previous Stroke/TIA and older than patients without recurrence. VKA patients showed a higher risk of recurrence with respect to DOAC patients (OR 1.9;95% CI 0.7–6.7).ConclusionsA trend toward fewer ICH recurrences was detected among DOACs patients in comparison to the previously reported rate of patients on warfarin.     

Effect of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists or warfarin in patients with left ventricular thrombus outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionLeft ventricular thrombus commonly occurs as a complication of acute anterior myocardial infarction and nonischemic cardiomyopathies with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Its frequency is still high despite medical advances. Current guidelines recommend the use of vitamin k antagonists as first-line therapy, however, the off-label use of direct oral anticoagulants is becoming more frequent and attractive, given the better pharmacological and clinical profile, with the improvement of the patient's quality of life.AimTo provide an update on the currently existing evidence regarding the outcomes of efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as first-line therapy in left ventricular thrombus, in comparison to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the effects of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists on left ventricular thrombi and on the results was performed.ResultsFourteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 2498 patients (n=631 direct oral anticoagulants and n=1867 for VKAs). No significant differences were found in efficacy and safety outcomes (odds ratio (OR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55–1.33; p=0.50; I²=32%) and (OR 1.0; 95% CI, 0.78–1.30; p=0.93; I²=2%) respectively. No difference was noted in all-cause mortality (OR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.58–1.45; p=0.74; I²=0%). Thrombus resolution was observed in 288/416 in direct oral anticoagulants vs. 732/1085 patients treated with VKAs (OR 1.14; 95% CI, 0.77–1.66; p=0.50; I²=33%).ConclusionsThe findings of this meta-analysis suggest the potential utility of DOACs as a first-line strategy in patients with left ventricular thrombus.     

Prognostic implications of adherence to oral anticoagulants among patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights from MISOAC-AF trial

ObjectivesTo explore the implications of adherence to oral anticoagulants (OACs) on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).MethodsThis post-hoc analysis of the MISOAC-AF trial included recently hospitalized patients with AF. Adherence to OACs was assessed by the proportion of days covered (PDC). Good adherence was defined as PDC >80 %. Cox regression models were used to associate PDC with clinical outcomes of all-cause death, cardiovascular death (CVD), stroke, and bleeding. A sub-analysis was performed among adherent patients to compare outcomes between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).ResultsDuring a median 31-month follow-up, 778 cardiac patients with comorbid AF who had been prescribed OACs upon hospital discharge were studied. The mean PDC was 0.78; 66 % of patients had good adherence (>80 %) which was associated with lower risk of all-cause death [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.64; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.46 to 0.84, p < 0.001] and CVD (aHR: 0.70; 95 % CI: 0.50 to 0.97, p = 0.03). The risk of stroke and major or non-major bleeding did not differ by adherence status. Among adherent patients to OACs, VKA use was associated with higher rates of all-cause death (p < 0.001), CVD (p < 0.001), and stroke (p = 0.01); no differences were found regarding major or non-major bleeding risk.ConclusionsIn recently hospitalized patients with AF, good adherence to OACs was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause death and CVD. The rates of stroke or bleeding events were not significantly different. VKAs were associated with more adverse events compared to DOACs.     

Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndromes: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome remain controversial.ObjectivesThe authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared DOACs with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through April 9, 2022. The 2 main efficacy outcomes were a composite of arterial thrombotic events and venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). The main safety outcome was major bleeding. Random effects models with inverse variance were used.ResultsOur search retrieved 253 studies. Four open-label randomized controlled trials involving 472 patients were included (mean control-arm time-in-therapeutic-range 60%). All had proper random sequence generation and adequate allocation concealment. Overall, the use of DOACs compared with VKAs was associated with increased odds of subsequent arterial thrombotic events (OR: 5.43; 95% CI: 1.87-15.75; P < 0.001, I² = 0%), especially stroke, and the composite of arterial thrombotic events or VTE (OR: 4.46; 95% CI: 1.12-17.84; P = 0.03, I² = 0%). The odds of subsequent VTE (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.31-4.55; P = 0.79, I² = 0%), or major bleeding (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.42-2.47; P = 0.97; I² = 0%) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Most findings were consistent within subgroups.ConclusionsPatients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome randomized to DOACs compared with VKAs appear to have increased risk for arterial thrombosis. No significant differences were observed between patients randomized to DOACs vs VKAs in the risk of subsequent VTE or major bleeding.