Serious complications of pancreatoduodenectomy correlate with lower rates of adjuvant chemotherapy: Would high-risk patients benefit from neoadjuvant therapy?

IntroductionPatients who suffer a serious complication of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) may have their adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) delayed or omitted as a result. We aimed to investigate whether PD complications affected AC rates.Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis of all PD patients with histologically-confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (2006–2015) was performed; 90-day mortality patients were excluded. Patients who commenced AC were compared to those who did not (morbidity rates and survival) and patients who developed selected postoperative complications were compared to those who did not (AC rates and survival).Results157 patients were included and 90-day mortality was 3.8%. Of the remaining patients, 102 (68.5%) received AC (AC data unavailable for two patients). Survival was longer in the AC group (p = 0.004). AC patients had less frequently experienced a postoperative chest infection (8.82% vs 34.0%, p = 0.0003) or a postoperative complication which was Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ II (29.4% vs 57.4%, p = 0.0019) or ≥ III (6.86% vs 21.3%, p = 0.023). Patients who experienced a postoperative chest infection (36.0% vs 75.0%, p = 0.0003) or a postoperative complication which was CD grade ≥ II (48.9% vs 73.1%, p = 0.0099) or ≥ III (29.4% vs 70.3%, p = 0.0018) less frequently commenced AC.ConclusionPatients who received AC had less frequently experienced a serious postoperative complication. Efforts should be made to preoperatively identify those who are high-risk for a serious complication as this cohort may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy.     

Outcomes of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer in elderly women

IntroductionFew data have been reported on robot-assisted surgery in elderly. The objectives were to compare feasibility, complication data, and survival of patients under and upper the age of 70 who are managed for endometrial cancer by robot-assisted laparoscopy.Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective comparative single-center study including patients treated between January 2007 and December 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups: less than 70 years and greater than or equal to 70 years. The primary endpoint was the rate of complications. The secondary endpoints were conversion rate and follow-up.Results148 patients were included: 86 under 70 (group A) and 62 aged 70 and over (group B). More adhesiolysis was performed in group B (p < .01); the pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection rates were not different between both groups (p = .2 and p = .9). The operating times were significantly longer in group B (220.1 vs. 234.4 min, p = .02). The conversion rate was similar between the 2 groups (p = .7). The tumors were endometrioid adenocarcinomas for 77.9 and 66.7% respectively (p = .2), with grade 3 tumors more represented in older patients (24.4% vs. 48.4%, p < .01). There were more tumors at high risk of recurrence after 70 years (33.7 vs. 45.2%, p = .04). No significant difference was found for postoperative complications. There was no difference in overall survival (p = .7) or progression-free survival (p = .2). Undertreated women rate was similar in both groups (p = .1).ConclusionRobotic surgery appears feasible and reproducible and could bring a benefit and allow optimal surgery without increasing the morbidity in the management of endometrial cancers whatever the age is.     

Margin ACcentuation for resectable Pancreatic cancer using Irreversible Electroporation – Results from the MACPIE-I study

IntroductionMargin accentuation (MA) using Irreversible electroporation (IRE) offers an unique opportunity to reduce the R1 resections in resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC). This study aims to assess the rate of margin positivity using IRE for MA during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for resectable pancreatic head tumours.Materials and methodsFollowing ethical approval, MA using IRE was carried out in 20 consecutive patients to posterior and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) margin, and the pancreatic neck, prior to the PD resection. The control group (non-IRE; n = 91) underwent PD without MA over the study period, March 2018 to March 2020.ResultsThere was no difference between the two groups in terms of patients’ age, gender, pre-op biliary drainage, site of malignancy or pre-operative TNM stage. The overall margin positive rate for IRE group was lesser (35.0%) when compared to non-IRE group (51.6%; p = 0.177), with significantly less posterior pancreatic margin positivity (5.0% vs. 25.3%; p = 0.046). When only treated margins (SMA margin excluded) were compared, the IRE group had significantly lower margin positive rates (20.0% vs. 51.6%; p = 0.013). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of intra- or post-operative complications. With a median follow-up of 15.6 months, the median DFS and OS for IRE and non-IRE groups were 17 and 18 months (p = 0.306) and 19 and 22 months (p = 0.227) respectively.ConclusionOur pilot study confirms the safety of MA using IRE for RPC, with reduction in margin positivity. These results as a proof of concept are promising and need further validation with a randomised controlled trial.     

The increasing role of abdominal metastesectomy for malignant melanoma in the era of modern therapeutics

BackgroundMetastatic spread of malignant melanoma to the abdomen presents a therapeutic challenge. Targeted and Immune-therapies dramatically improve patients’ survival, yet some patients may still benefit from surgical intervention. This study investigates the outcomes of surgical treatment of abdominal metastatic melanoma in the era of modern therapy.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent surgical resection for abdominal metastatic melanoma between the years 2009–2021 (n = 80). We examined the clinical, operative, perioperative, and oncological outcomes of these patients.ResultsThe cohort included a therapeutic group (T, n = 43) and palliative group (P, n = 37). The rate of overall post-operative complications was lower in the T group (n = 3, 9.3%) compared to the P group (n = 10, 27.1%) (p = 0.04), but no difference in major complications rate (p = 0.41). The median follow-up was 13.4 months (range, 0.5–107), with an estimated 2- and 5-years survival of 66.5% and 45.3% respectively. The estimated 2- and 5-years survival of the T group was 76.61% and 69.65%, and 49.01% and 28.01% in the P group (p = 0.005). Univariate analysis identified Therapeutic resection (HR 3.2, p = 0.008), isolated lesions (HR 1.47, p = 0.033) and major complication score (HR 1.8, p=<0.001) to be correlated with survival. On multivariate analysis, Therapeutic resection (HR 2.53, p = 0.042) and major complication score (HR 1.62, p = 0.004) remained significant independent factors correlated with survival. In patients who progressed on treatment, and their progression was treated with surgical resection 46.1% where able to be maintained on the same preoperative treatment strategy.ConclusionWe have demonstrated that abdominal metastesectomy is a safe and oncologically efficacious therapy in selected patients. Especially in the era of modern therapeutics, patients with isolated disease site, limited resectable progression on therapy, or patients with symptomatic metastases should be considered for surgical resection.     

Pure laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver F4 cirrhosis without routine Pringle maneuver – A propensity analysis in a single center

Background/Aim: Laparoscopic hepatectomy has been gaining popularity but its evidence in major hepatectomy for cirrhotic liver is lacking. We studied the long-term outcomes of the pure laparoscopic approach versus the open approach in major hepatectomy without Pringle maneuver in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis using the propensity score analysis.MethodsWe reviewed patients diagnosed with HCC and cirrhosis who underwent major hepatectomy as primary treatment. The outcomes of patients who received the laparoscopic approach were compared with those of propensity-case-matched patients (ratio, 4:1) who received the open approach. The matching was made on the following factors: tumor size, tumor number, age, sex, hepatitis serology, HCC staging, comorbidity, and liver function.ResultsTwenty-four patients underwent pure laparoscopic major hepatectomy for HCC with cirrhosis. Ninety-six patients who underwent open major hepatectomy were matched by propensity scores. The laparoscopic group had less median blood loss (300 ml vs 645 ml, p = 0.001), shorter median hospital stay (6 days vs 10 days, p = 0.002), and lower rates of overall complication (12.5% vs 39.6%, p = 0.012), pulmonary complication (4.2% vs 25%, p = 0.049) and pleural effusion (p = 0.026). The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates in the laparoscopic group vs the open group were 95.2%, 89.6% and 89.6% vs 87.5%, 72.0% and 62.8% (p = 0.211). Correspondingly, the disease-free survival rates were 77.1%, 71.2% and 71.2% vs 75.8%, 52.7% and 45.5% (p = 0.422).ConclusionsThe two groups had similar long-term survival. The laparoscopic group had favorable short-term outcomes. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy without routine Pringle maneuver for HCC with cirrhosis is a safe treatment option at specialized centers.     

Wrapping double-mattress anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy can significantly reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in open surgery: An analysis of a propensity score-matched sample

BackgroundMinimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD), including laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), is technically demanding because of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most serious complication of MIPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). Contrary to expectations, conventional PJ in MIPD did not improve POPF rate and length of hospital stay. High POPF rates are attributed to technical issues encountered during MIPD, which include motion restriction and insufficient water tightness. Therefore, we developed wrapping double-mattress anastomosis, the Kiguchi method, which is a novel PJ technique that can improve MIPD. Herein, we describe the Kiguchi method for PJ in MIPD and compare the outcomes between this technique and conventional PJ in OPD.MethodsThe current retrospective study included 83 patients in whom the complete obstruction of the main pancreatic duct by pancreatic tumors was absent on preoperative imaging. This research was performed from September 2016 to August 2020 at Fujita Health University Hospital. All patients were evaluated as having a soft pancreatic texture, which is the most important factor associated with POPF development. Briefly, 50 patients underwent OPD with conventional PJ (OPD group). Meanwhile, 33 patients, including 15 and 18 who had LPD and RPD, respectively, underwent MIPD using the Kiguchi method (MIPD group). After a 1:1 propensity score matching, 30 patients in the OPD group were matched to 30 patients in the MIPD group.ResultsThe patients’ preoperative data did not differ. The grade B/C POPF rate was significantly lower in the MIPD group than in the OPD group (6.7% vs 40.0%, p = 0.002). The MIPD group had a significantly shorter median length of hospital stay than the OPD group (24 vs 30 days, p = 0.004).ConclusionThe novel Kiguchi method in MIPD significantly reduced the POPF rate in patients without complete obstruction of the main pancreatic duct.     

Oncological outcomes after major vascular resections for primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma

BackgroundThe surgical management of retroperitoneal sarcomas frequently involves complex multivisceral resections, however retroperitoneal liposarcoma (LPS) rarely invade major abdominal vessels. The aim of the study was to assess association of major vascular resections with outcome of primary LPS.MethodsAll consecutive patients who underwent resection at our institutions for primary LPS between 2002 and 2019 were included. A propensity matched analysis was performed, adjusting the groups for the variables of Sarculator, to assess the effect of vascular resection on oncological outcomes.ResultsOverall 425 patients were identified. Twenty-four (5%) patients had vascular resection. At final pathology 18 patients had vascular infiltration, 2 vascular encasement and 4 involvement without infiltration. Vascular resection was associated with longer operative time (480′ vs. 330’; p < 0.001) and greater need for transfusions (4 vs. 0 units; p < 0.001), and was burdened by a higher rate of major complications (54% vs. 25%; p = 0.002). After propensity matched analysis, patients undergoing vascular resection had a lower 5-year OS (60% vs. 81%; p = 0.05), and a higher incidence of local and distant recurrence at 5 years (local: 45% vs. 24%, p = 0.05; distant: 20% vs. 0%, p = 0.04).ConclusionsVascular resection is feasible and safe even in the context of multivisceral resection for primary retroperitoneal liposarcomas, although associated to a higher complication rate. However, the independent association between vascular involvement and a higher risk of local recurrence, distant metastases and death may imply a more aggressive biology, which should be factored in the initial management of this complex disease.     

Post-operative outcomes and quality of life assessment after thoracoscopic lobectomy for Non-small-cell lung cancer in octogenarians: Analysis from a national database

BackgroundThoracoscopic lobectomy (VATS-L) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a well-established option for early stage NSCLC, but the evidences are limited for octogenarians.ObjectiveThe objectives of this multi-institutional study were to evaluate the post-operative outcomes of VATS-L in octogenarians and to estimate the post-operative quality of life (QoL) using a validated questionnaire (EuroQoL5D).MethodsData from patients underwent VATS-L between 2014 and 2019 were analysed and divided into two groups: Group A (younger patients) and Group B (octogenarians). To define predictors for complications, univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed.Results7023 patients underwent VATS-L and 329 (4.6%) were octogenarians. 30-day and 90-day post-operative mortality were similar (0.95% vs 0.91%, p = 0.84 and 1.3% vs 1.2%, p = 0.58), whereas the percentage of patients who suffered from any complication (25.5% vs 31.9%, p = 0.012) and the complication rate (31.6% vs 45.2%, p=<0.01) were higher for octogenarians. At discharge, the values of EuroQoL5D were worse in group B, but after one month these levels became similar. Age >80 years had a significant influence on morbidity on both univariate and multivariable analyses (p = 0.025).ConclusionsVATS-L for NSCLC can be performed in selected octogenarians without increased risk of post-operative death, acceptable not-life-threatening complications and a moderate impact on QoL.     

Uni-vs. bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction – A multicenter outcome analysis

ObjectiveOver the past decade numbers of bilateral mastectomy have increased steadily. As a result, bilateral breast reconstruction is gaining popularity. The presented study compares complications and outcomes of unilateral and bilateral DIEP free-flap breast reconstructions using the largest database available in Europe.MethodsFemale breast cancer patients (n = 3926) receiving DIEP flap breast reconstructions (n = 4577 free flaps) at 22 different centers were included in this study. Free flaps were stratified into two groups: a unilateral- (UL) and a bilateral- (BL) breast reconstruction group. Groups were compared with regard to surgical complications and free flap outcome.ResultsMean operative time was significantly longer in the BL group (UL: 285.2 ± 107.7 vs. BL: 399.1 ± 136.8 min; p < 0.001). Mean ischemia time was comparable between groups (p = 0.741). There was no significant difference with regard to total (UL 1.8% vs. BL 2.6%, p = 0.081) or partial flap loss (UL 1.2% vs. BL 0.9%, p = 0.45) between both groups. Rates of venous or arterial thrombosis were comparable between both groups (venous: UL 2.9% vs. BL 2.2%, p = 0.189; arterial: UL 1.8% vs. BL 1.2%, p = 0.182). However, significantly higher rates of hematoma at the donor and recipient site were observed in the UL group (donor site: UL 1.1% vs. BL 0.1%, p = 0.001; recipient site UL 3.9% vs. BL 1.7%, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe data underline the feasibility of bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction, when performed in a setting of specialized centers.     

Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: A multicenter analysis

IntroductionMulticenter retrospective analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors (i.e. 3 points for the ‘E’ domain of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score) was performed.Materials and methodsPatients’ demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative, functional, pathological and oncological data were analyzed and compared with those of patients with exophytic and mesophytic masses (i.e. 1 and 2 points for the ‘E’ domain, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess variables for trifecta achievement (negative margin, no postoperative complications, and 90% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] recovery).ResultsOverall, 147 patients were included in the study group. Patients with a completely endophytic mass had bigger tumors (mean 4.2 vs. 4.1 vs. 3.2 cm; p < 0.001) on preoperative imaging and higher overall R.E.N.A.L. score. There was no difference in mean operative time. Estimated blood loss was higher in the endophytic group (mean 177.75 vs. 185.5 vs. 130 ml; p = 0.001). Warm ischemia time was shorter for the exophytic group (median 16 vs. 21 vs. 22 min; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in patients with endophytic tumor (24.8% vs. 19.5% vs. 14.8%; p < 0.001). Six (4.5%) patients had positive surgical margins, there was no difference between groups. Trifecta was achieved in 44 patients in endophytic group (45.4 vs. 68.8 and 50.9%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis for trifecta revealed that clinical tumor size (odds ratio: 0.667, 95% confidence interval: 0.56–0.79, p < 0.001) was only significant predictor for trifecta achievement.ConclusionsOur findings confirm that RAPN in case of completely endophytic renal masses can be performed with acceptable outcomes in centers with significant robotic expertise.     

Comparison of totally laparoscopic and laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and laparoscopic surgery have been increasingly used in the treatment of gastric cancer, however, the feasibility and safety of totally laparoscopic gastrectomy after NACT still remain unknown.Materials and methodsAt the Gastrointestinal cancer center of Peking university cancer hospital and institute in Beijing, clinical and pathological data of patients who has received NACT, followed by radical laparoscopic gastrectomy was retrospectively reviewed between March 2011 and November 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether intracorporeal anastomosis or extracorporeal anastomosis had been performed, short-term outcomes (post-operative recovery index and complications) and economic cost were compared between 2 groups.ResultAll of 139 patients underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy. 87 [62.6%] patients had totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG) and 52 [37.4%] patients had laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG). Overall complication rate was 28.8% in all patients. TLG group was significantly associated with lower overall complication rate (21.8% VS 40.4%; p = 0.019) and major complication rate (3.4% VS 13.5%; p = 0.001) compared with LAG group. Overall cost was similar (p = 0.077). In subgroup analysis, totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) group showed lower overall postoperative complication rate (19.0% VS 56.5%; p = 0.011), as well as marginal significant differences in major complication (0% VS 21.7%; p = 0.05) than laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) group. Earlier first liquid diet (4 [3.5–5] day VS 6 [4–6.5] day; p = 0.047), earlier first aerofluxus (3 [3-4] day VS 4 [3–4.5] day; p = 0.02) and a shorter hospital stay (9 [8-12] day VS 12 [10-15] day; p = 0.004) were observed in TLTG group. Overall and major complication rate were similar in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) and laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) group (22.7% VS 27.6%; p = 0.611; 4.5% VS 6.9%; p = 0.639; respectively). Significant differences were found between TLDG and LADG groups regarding time to first liquid diet (4 [3-5] day VS 6 [3.75–6] day; p = 0.006), time to first aerofluxus (3 [3–3] day VS 4 [3-6] day; p< 0.001), time to first defecation (4 [4-5] day VS 5 [4-6] day; p = 0.045), time to remove all drainage (7 [6-8] day VS 8 [6-9] day; p = 0.021), white blood cell count on postoperative Day 1 (9.54 ± 2.49 10⁹/L VS 10.91 ± 2.89 10⁹/L; p = 0.021)and postoperative hospital stay (9 [8-10] day VS 10 [9,13] day; p = 0.009).ConclusionFor patients with Locally advanced gastric cancer who received NACT, totally laparoscopic gastrectomy, including TLTG and TLDG, doesn’t increase complications and overall cost compared with LAG, and has advantages in gastrointestinal function recovery, incision length and postoperative hospital stay.     

Real-world implementation of a geriatric-specific ERAS protocol in patients undergoing colonic cancer surgery

BackgroundThe aim of this single-center observational study was to evaluate the impact of implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, combined with systematic geriatric assessment and support, on surgical and oncological outcomes in patients aged 70 or older undergoing colonic cancer surgery.MethodsTwo groups were formed from an actively maintained database from all patients undergoing laparoscopic colonic surgery for neoplasms during a defined period before (standard group) or after (ERAS group) the introduction of an ERAS program associated with systematic geriatric assessment. The primary outcome was postoperative 90-day morbidity. Secondary outcomes were total length of hospital stay, initiated and completed adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) rate, and 1-year mortality rate.ResultsA total of 266 patients (135 standard and 131 ERAS) were included in the study. Overall 90-day morbidity and mean hospital stay were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the standard group (22.1% vs. 35.6%, p = 0.02; and 6.2 vs. 9.3 days, p < 0.01, respectively). There were no differences in readmission rates and anastomotic complications. AC was recommended in 114 patients. The rate of initiated treatment was comparable between the groups (66.6% vs. 77.7%, p = 0.69). The rate of completed AC was significantly higher in the ERAS group (50% vs. 20%, p < 0.01) with a lower toxicity rate (57.1% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.002). The 1-year mortality rate was higher in the standard group (7.4% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe combination of ERAS protocols and geriatric assessment and support reduces the overall morbidity rate and improves 12-month oncologic outcomes.     

Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after previous trans-urethral resection of the prostate: Assessment of functional and oncological outcomes

Backgroundno data exist concerning functional and oncological outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP), in patients previously treated with trans-urethral resection of the prostate (p-TURP), for benign prostate obstruction. Our study addressed the impact of p-TURP on immediate and 12-months urinary continence recovery (UCR), as well as peri-operative outcomes and surgical margins, after RS-RARP.Methodsall patients treated with RS-RARP for prostate cancer at a single high-volume European institution, between 2010 and 2021, were identified and stratified according to p-TURP status. Logistic, Poisson and Cox regression models were performed.ResultsOf 1386 RS-RARP patients, 99 (7%) had history of p-TURP. Between p-TURP and no-TURP patients no differences were detected regarding both intra- and post-operative complications (p values = 0.9). The rates of immediate UCR were 40 vs 67% in p-TURP vs no-TURP patients (p < 0.001). At 12 months from RS-RARP, the rates of UCR were 68 vs 94% in p-TURP vs no-TURP patients (p < 0.001). At multivariable logistic and Cox regression models, p-TURP was independently associated, respectively, with lower immediate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.32, p < 0.001) and 12-months UCR (hazard ratio: 0.54, p < 0.001). At multivariable Poisson analyses, p-TURP predicted longer operative time (rate ratio: 1.08, p < 0.001) but not longer length of stay or time to catheter removal (p values > 0.05). Positive surgical margins rates were 23 vs 17% in p-TURP vs no-TURP patients (p = 0.1), which translated in a non-statistically significant multivariable OR of 1.14 (p = 0.6).Conclusionsp-TURP does not increase surgical morbidity but portends longer operative time and worse urinary continence after RS-RARP.     

Clinical implication of tumor site in terms of node metastasis for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BackgroundThe clinical implication of lymph node (LN) dissection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) is still controversial, and LN metastasis (LNM) based on tumor site has not been confirmed yet.MethodsPatients who underwent curative-intent surgery at 10 tertiary referral centers were identified and divided into peripheral (PP) and near second confluence level tumor (NC) groups on the basis of the distance from the second confluence and oncological outcomes were compared.ResultsOf 179 patients, 121 patients with LND were divided into the NC (n = 89) and PP groups (n = 32) on the basis of 4.5 cm from the second confluence. NC group showed higher LNM rate than PP group (46.1 vs 21.9%, p = 0.016) and NC was a risk factor for LNM (odds ratio: 4.367; 95% confidence interval: 1.234–15.453, p = 0.022). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (38.0% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.777) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates (22.8% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.742) showed no differences between the PP and NC groups. In the NC group, N1 patients showed worse 5-year OS (12.7% vs 39.0%, p = 0.004) and RFS (8.8% vs 28.6%, p = 0.004) than the N0 patients. In the PP group, discordant results in 5-year OS (48.9% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.462) and RFS (41.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.056) were found between the N0 and N1 patients.ConclusionThe NC group was an independent risk factor for LNM and LNM worsened prognosis in NC group for ICCA. In the PP group, LND should not be omitted because of high LNM rate and insufficient oncologic evidence.     

A propensity score matching analysis: Impact of senior resident versus fellow participation on outcomes of complex surgical oncology

BackgroundTeaching hospitals that train both general surgery residents and fellows in complex general surgical oncology have become more common. This study investigates whether participation of a senior resident versus a fellow has an impact on outcomes of patients undergoing complex cancer surgery.MethodsPatients who underwent esophagectomy, gastrectomy, hepatectomy, or pancreatectomy between 2007 and 2012 with assistance from a senior resident (post-graduate years 4–5) or a fellow (post-graduate years 6–8) were identified from the ACS NSQIP. Based on age, sex, body mass index, ASA classification, diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and smoking status, propensity-scores were created for odds of undergoing the operation assisted by a fellow. Patients were matched 1:1 based on propensity score. Postoperative outcomes including risk of major complication were compared after matching.ResultsIn total, 6934 esophagectomies, 13,152 gastrectomies, 4927 hepatectomies, and 8040 pancreatectomies were performed with assistance of a senior resident or fellow. After matching, overall rates of major complications were equivalent across all four anatomic locations between cases performed with the participation of a senior resident versus a surgical fellow: esophagectomy (37.0%% vs 31.6%, p = 0.10), gastrectomy (22.6% vs 22.3%, p = 0.93), hepatectomy (15.8% v 16.0%, p = 0.91), and pancreatectomy (23.9% vs 25.2%, p = 0.48). Operative time was shorter for gastrectomy (212 vs. 232 min; p = 0.004) involving a resident compared to a fellow, but comparable for esophagectomy (330 vs. 336 min; p = 0.41), hepatectomy (217 vs. 219 min; p = 0.85), and pancreatectomy (320 vs. 330 min; p = 0.43).ConclusionsSenior resident participation in complex cancer operations does not appear to negatively impact operative time or postoperative outcomes. Future research is needed to further assess this domain of surgical practice and education, particularly with regard to case selection and operative complexity.     

The impact of sarcopenia and myosteatosis on postoperative outcomes and 5-year survival in curatively operated colorectal cancer patients – A retrospective register study

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate whether sarcopenia or myosteatosis have an impact on short- and long-term results in patients who were surgically treated for colorectal cancer.MethodsDuring 2007–2011 curatively treated colorectal cancer patients (n = 348) were included in the study. Clinical data was collected retrospectively from patient registers. Skeletal muscle mass was measured at the L3 level via venous-phase computed tomography and patients were divided into sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic and into myosteatotic and non-myosteatotic. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were analysed in these groups.ResultsSarcopenia was found in 208 patients (59.8%) and myosteatosis was found in 108 patients (31.2%). Sarcopenia was associated with increased risk of postoperative pneumonia (6.7% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.021). Sarcopenic colon cancer patients had higher rate of cardiorespiratory complications than non-sarcopenic (6.3% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.023) and sarcopenic rectum cancer patients had more often pneumonia than non-sarcopenic (8.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.041). Discharge to home was less common in myosteatotic patients than in non-myosteatotic patients (47.7% vs. 76.9%, p < 0.001) and also in sarcopenic patients than in non-sarcopenic patients (62.7% vs. 75.5%, p = 0.013). Myosteatotic patients had decreased overall survival according to a Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.002) and in the multivariable-adjusted Cox model (HR = 1.6, p = 0.034).ConclusionsSarcopenia increases the pneumonia and cardiorespiratory complication rates. Sarcopenia and myosteatosis predicts the need for institutional care after colorectal cancer surgery. Sarcopenia and myosteatosis seem to be negative factors for colorectal cancer patients’ survival. Myosteatosis is an independent risk factor for poor overall 5-year survival.     

Comparison of transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches in the treatment of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction cancers: A propensity score-matching analysis

BackgroundThe appropriate surgical approach for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer remains under discussion. We compared surgical outcomes between transabdominal (TA) and transthoracic (TT) approaches for treating type II EGJ cancers.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study reviewed 397 type II EGJ cancer patients who underwent surgery from January 2001 to May 2019. We used a 1:3 propensity score-matching method for the analysis. The matching factors were age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, period of operation, and pathologic stage. Matching was performed using the MatchIt package of R 4.0.2.ResultsA total of 46 patients in the TT group was matched to 126 patients in the TA group. R0 resection was achieved in both groups and was not statistically different between groups (p = 0.455). In the TA group, the operation time and in-hospital stay length were significantly shorter (p < 0.001) and the intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower than in the TT group (p = 0.011). The postoperative complication rate between the two groups was significantly different (p = 0.003). There was marginal difference in the five-year OS rate (p = 0.049) and significant difference in the five-year DFS (p = 0.039). However, surgical approach was not a significant prognostic factor in multivariate analysis of OS or DFS.ConclusionsThere was no clear survival benefit of one approach over the other. However, less intraoperative bleeding, lower postoperative complication rate, shorter operation time, and reduced in-hospital stay length were correlated with the TA approach.     

Liver venous deprivation versus associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for colo-rectal liver metastases: a comparison of early and late kinetic growth rates,and perioperative and oncological outcomes

BackgroundDifferent techniques have been developed to optimize the Future Liver Remnant (FLR). Associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and liver venous deprivation (LVD) have shown the higher hypertrophy rates, but their place in clinical practice is still debated.MethodsThirty-two consecutive ALPPS and LVD procedures for CRLM performed between December 2015 and December 2019 were included. This retrospective study evaluated kinetic growth rates (KGR) as primary outcome, and perioperative and oncological outcomes as secondary endpoints.ResultsA total of 17 patients underwent LVD before surgery, whereas 15 underwent ALPPS. On early evaluation (7 vs 9 days, respectively), KGR did not differ between ALPPS and LVD cohort (0.8% per day vs 0.3% per day, p = 0.70; 23 cc/day vs 26 cc/day, p = 0.31). Late evaluation (21 vs 9 days) showed a KGR significantly decreased in the LVD group (0.6% per day vs 0.2% per day, p = 0.21; 20 cc/day vs 10 cc/day p = 0.02). Mean FLR-V increase was comparable in the two groups (60% vs 49%, p 0.32). Successful resection rate was 100% and 94% in LVD and ALPPS group, respectively. The hospital stay (p < 0.0001) and severe complications rate (p = 0.05) were lower after LVD. One and 3-years overall survival (OS) were 72,7% and 27,4% in the ALPSS group, versus 81,3% and 54,7% in LVD group (p = 0.10). The Median DFS was comparable between both techniques (6.1 months and 5.9 respectively, p = 0.66).ConclusionsLVD and ALPPS shows similar KGR during the early period following preparation as well as similar survival outcomes. Hospital stay and severe complications are lower after LVD.     

The role of malnutrition universal screening tool in predicting outcomes after radical cystectomy

PurposeThe Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool integrates body mass index, unintentional weight loss and present illness to assess risk for malnutrition. The predictive role of ‘MUST’ among patients undergoing radical cystectomy is unknown. We investigated the role of ‘MUST’ in predicting postoperative outcomes and prognosis among patients after RC.Materials and methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of 291 patients who underwent radical cystectomy in 6 medical centers between 2015 and 2019. Patients were stratified to risk groups according to the ‘MUST’ score [low risk (n = 242) vs. medium-to-high risk (n = 49)]. Baseline characteristics were compared between groups. Endpoints were 30-day postoperative complications rate, cancer-specific-survival and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-regression analyses were used to evaluate survival and identify predictors of outcomes.ResultsMedian age of the study cohort was 69 years (IQR 63–74). Median duration of follow up for survivors was 33 months (IQR 20–43). Thirty-day major postoperative complications rate was 17%. Baseline characteristics were not different between the ‘MUST’ groups, and there was no difference in early post-operative complication rates. CSS and OS were significantly lower (p ≤ 0.02) in the medium-to-high-risk group (‘MUST’ score≥1) with estimated 3-year CSS and OS rates of 60% and 50% compared to 76% and 71% in the low-risk group, respectively. On multivariable analysis, ‘MUST’≥1 was an independent predictor of overall- (HR = 1.95, p = 0.006) and cancer-specific-mortality (HR = 1.74, p = 0.05).ConclusionsHigh ‘MUST’ scores are associated with decreased survival in patients after radical cystectomy. Thus, the ‘MUST’ score may serve as a preoperative tool for patient selection and nutritional intervention.     

A large multicenter propensity match study of sentinel lymph node biopsy feasibility in endometrioid variants of endometrial cancer

IntroductionSentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy algorithm has been routinely applied in all endometrial endometrioid tumors, however, no studies analyzed the feasibility of SLN mapping in endometrioid variants (EV), which included villoglandular, secretory, ciliated cell, mucinous, and squamous differentiation. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of SLN biopsy in EV of EC.Materials and methodsAll patients undergoing minimally invasive surgical treatment for early-stage EC were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 study groups: Group 1 which included patients with EV, and Group 2 which included patients with typical endometrioid histology. A propensity match analysis was performed according to age (≥65 years vs. no), BMI (≥30 kg/m² vs. no), and LVSI (present vs. absent).ResultsAfter a 1:5 propensity-matched analysis, a total of 458 patients were identified (Group 1 n = 77, Group 2 n = 381). Overall detection rate was not statistically significant between the EV and the typical endometrioid group (94.8% vs. 92.4%, p = 0.319). Furthermore, neither bilateral nor unilateral detection rate was different between the two groups (70.1% vs. 74.8%, p = 0.267, and 23.4% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.120). BMI ≥30 kg/m² was the only factor influencing SLN failure (p = 0.013). SLN technique showed excellent sensitivity in both the EV (100% sensitivity, p < 0.001) and the typical endometrioid unit (93.8% sensitivity, p < 0.001).ConclusionSLN research/detection for EV of endometrial cancer is a feasible and highly sensitive technique. Obesity was confirmed to be a risk factor for SLN failure.