Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a diagnostic evaluation study

ObjectivesThe diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) is often made on clinical suspicion alone, resulting in both under- and overdiagnosis and relatively poor outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the clinical utility of the Xpert MTB/RIF on routinely collected extrapulmonary specimens in Ethiopia.MethodsThis study was carried out at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Extrapulmonary specimens were collected from 572 patients clinically suspected of suffering from EPTB. All specimens were tested for TB by smear microscopy, culture, and Xpert MTB/RIF. The diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF was calculated and compared to a composite reference standard (CRS), comprising clinical and laboratory results.ResultsIn total, 572 extrapulmonary specimens (279 lymph node, 159 pleural, 80 peritoneal, 45 cerebrospinal, and nine pericardial fluids) were tested. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF were calculated to be 75% (95% CI 70–80) and 98% (95% CI 97–100) respectively when compared to the CRS. The highest sensitivity was documented for lymph node specimens (90%; 95% CI 86–94), moderate sensitivity for cerebrospinal fluid (53%; 95% CI 28–79), while the sensitivity was lowest for pleural (30%; 95% CI 17–44) and peritoneal (32%; 95% CI 12–51) fluids. Xpert MTB/RIF in addition detected rifampicin resistance in 13 patients, in perfect agreement with results from the line probe assay.ConclusionsXpert MTB/RIF may be used as initial diagnostic tool for testing of lymph node specimens from patients suspected of having TB lymphadenitis. The added value of Xpert MTB/RIF to diagnose pleural or peritoneal TB is limited by its poor sensitivity.     

Diagnostic Accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Assay in Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis

Introduction: The WHO endorsed Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin (MTB/RIF) assay, has been evaluated for pulmonary TB in a number of studies but very few have investigated it for extrapulmonary specimens. The present study evaluates the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB (EPTB). Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study is to determine sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of EPTB and RIF resistance in comparison to culture on Lowenstein–Jensen (LJ) medium and proportion method (PM), respectively. Materials and Methods: A total of 738 specimens from clinically suspected cases of EPTB were subjected to Ziehl–Neelsen staining, Xpert MTB/RIF assay and culture on LJ medium. PM was done on MTB isolates. Results: The sensitivity, specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of EPTB were 84.91% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.41%–93.25%) and 86.72% (95% CI 83.94%–89.17%) and for RIF resistance detection were 60.00% (95% CI 32.29%–83.66%) and 94.74% (95% CI 73.97%–99.87%), respectively. Among culture-positive cases, the sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay was 94.12% in smear positive and 80.56% in smear-negative cases. Xpert MTB/RIF showed maximum sensitivity of MTB detection from lymph node specimens (100% [95% CI 54.07%–100.00%]) and other body fluids (100% [95% CI 15.81%–100.00%]). Conclusion: The present study establishes Xpert MTB/RIF assay as a promising tool in the rapid diagnosis of EPTB and detection of RIF resistance.     

Evaluation of the Xpert MTB/RIF test accuracy for diagnosis of tuberculosis in areas with a moderate tuberculosis burden

The Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) is a molecular assay used for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in clinical specimens. In this study, we aimed to assess the accuracy of the Xpert assay for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in TB suspected patients from the northern region of Iran. The obtained results were compared with the culture method. The sputum specimens were examined using the Xpert assay, smear microscopy, and solid culture media as a reference diagnostic tool. Among 293 presumptive TB cases, 92 (31.4%) were positive according to the culture method. The Xpert method detected 88 (95.7%) cases that were positive according to the culture method, compared with 78 (84.8%) positive cases according to smear microscopy. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert method for TB diagnosis were 95.7% and 99%, respectively. Also, the sensitivity and specificity for smear microscopy were 84.8% and 97.5%, respectively. The Xpert assay showed high overall sensitivity and specificity; thus, it can be effectively used for the early and accurate diagnosis of MTB in TB endemic areas. In addition, the agreement between semi‐quantitative results of Xpert and smear microscopy assays could be helpful in evaluating transmission potential in TB patients.     

Xpert结核分枝杆菌/利福平试验对结核病及耐多药结核病诊断价值的Meta分析

目的 评估Xpert结核分枝杆菌/利福平（MTB/RIF）试验对结核病的诊断价值.方法 检索PubMed、Medline、中国知网、万方数据库等,收集Xpert MTB/RIF试验对结核病诊断价值的文献,检索起止时间均为建库至2012年6月.2名研究者独立进行资料提取和文献质量评估.采用Meta-Disc 1.4软件进行Meta分析.结果 共纳入26篇文献,其中2篇文献涉及儿童病例,包含了13 270例来自临床患者的检测标本.Meta分析结果显示,Xpert MTB/RIF试验诊断结核病的汇总敏感度为87%（95%CI：86%～88%）、特异度为97%（95%CI：97%～97%）.按照结核病的类型和患者年龄进行亚组分析,Xpert MTB/RIF试验诊断肺结核的敏感度高于肺外结核病,90%（95%CI：89%～91%） vs 76%（95%CI：72%～79%）;诊断涂阴菌阳性和涂阳菌阳性结核病的敏感度分别为74%（95%CI：71%～76%）和99%（95%CI：98%～99%）;对儿童肺结核的诊断敏感度比成人肺结核低,74%（95%CI：65%～83%） vs 90%（95%CI：89%～92%）.Xpert MTB/RIF试验诊断耐多药结核病的敏感度为96%（95%CI：94%～97%）,特异度为98%（95%CI：98%～99%）.结论 Xpert MTB/RIF试验诊断结核病的价值较高,尤其是成人结核病及耐多药结核病.Xpert MTB/RIF试验在儿童结核病中的诊断价值由于纳入文献较少,尚待进一步研究.     

Xpert MTB/RIF技术对结核分枝杆菌的诊断价值

目的 对Xpert MTB/RIF技术检测结核分枝杆菌（MTB）的结果进行分析并评估其价值。方法 采集2017年10月~2018年10月本院就诊疑为结核分枝杆菌感染的患者共580例,利用Xpert MTB/RIF技术对其痰液（或体液）标本进行DNA检测,同时将标本进行固体培养及涂片抗酸染色并对检测结果进行比较。结果 Xpert MTB/RIF技术检测MTB的阳性率为18.97%（110/580）,和固体培养法的阳性率18.62%（108/580）相比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;和抗酸染色法的阳性率15.00%（87/580）相比则更为敏感,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。 结论 Xpert MTB/RIF检测技术和固体培养法不相上下,且由于抗酸染色法,可以用于MTB的快速筛选。     

GeneXpertMTB/RIF Assay对肺部结核的临床诊断及治疗价值

目的:探究GeneXpertMTB/RIF Assay对临床诊断及治疗肺部结核的应用价值。方法:收集2019年1月至2019年12月在甘孜藏族自治州人民医院住院的肺结核患者的痰液标本148份,同时选取50份非结核肺部感染患者的痰液标本作为对照。分别采用涂片抗酸杆菌检查、MGIT960检测MTB及药敏法和GeneXpertMTB/RIF检测法对痰液标本中的结核分枝杆菌及其耐药性进行测定,并以MGIT960药敏法为标准分析GeneXpertMTB/RIF检测法检测RIF耐药性的敏感性及特异性。结果:GeneXpertMTB/RIF、MGIT960培养法及直接涂片法检测痰液标本中MTB的敏感度分别为60.14%、58.11%、24.32%;特异度分别为100.00%、92.00%和94.00%。GeneXpertMTB/RIF检测法的灵敏度明显高于其他两项检测方法。GeneXpertMTB/RIF检测法与BACTEC MGIT960培养法无统计学差异(X²=0.126,P=0.722),与痰涂片检测结果差异也无统计学意(X²⁼38.899,P=0.000);GeneXpertMTB/RIF检测法检测利福平耐药性的敏感度为100.00%,特异度为95.31%。结论:GeneXpertMTB/RIF检测法的检测速度快、灵敏度高、特异性强,有助于实验室结核分枝杆菌及其耐药性的快速鉴定和筛查,对于临床上对结核病患者的早期诊断和治疗有着非常重要的临床应用意义。     

Cell-free Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA test in pleural effusion for tuberculous pleurisy: a diagnostic accuracy study

ObjectivesTuberculous pleurisy (TP) diagnosis remains difficult, with the sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and mycobacterial culture (culture) only about 30–50%. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of a cell-free Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA test (cf-TB) in pleural effusion for TP.MethodsAdults (≥18 years) with suspected TP presenting with pleural effusion were consecutively recruited, and pleural effusion specimens were prospectively collected in Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing, China. After centrifuging pleural effusion, sediments were used for culture, Xpert and T-SPOT.TB assay, whereas supernatants were used for cf-TB and adenosine deaminase assay. The diagnostic performance was assessed against a composite reference standard.ResultsFrom June 2015 to December 2018, we prospectively evaluated 286 adults with suspected TP. One hundred twenty-two participants were classified as definite TP based on the prespecified composite reference standard. The cf-TB produced a sensitivity of 79.5% (97/122, 95% confidence interval (CI) 72.4– 86.7) for definite TP, which was superior to Xpert (38.5% (29.9–47.2); 47/122; p < 0.001) and culture (27.1% (19.2–34.9); 33/122; p < 0.001). With pleural effusion Xpert and/or culture as the reference standard, cf-TB showed 96.6% (57/59, 95% CI 92.0–100.0) sensitivity, which was also significantly higher than Xpert (79.7%, 95% CI 69.4–89.9; 47/59; p 0.004) and culture (55.9%, 95% CI: 43.3–68.6; 33/59; p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe cf-TB clearly showed improved sensitivity compared with Xpert and culture. We recommend cf-TB as the first-line test for TP diagnosis.     

Diagnostic accuracy of the FluoroType MTB and MTBDR VER 2.0 assays for the centralized high-throughput detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA and isoniazid and rifampicin resistance

ObjectivesTo evaluate the accuracy of two new molecular diagnostic tests for the detection of drug-resistant tuberculosis, the FluoroType MTB and MTBDR VER 2.0 assays, in combination with manual and automated DNA extraction methods.MethodsSputa from 360 Xpert Ultra Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC)-positive patients and 250 Xpert Ultra MTBC-negative patients were tested. GenoType MTBDRplus served as reference for MTBC and drug resistance detection. Sanger sequencing was used to resolve discrepancies.ResultsFluoroType MTB VER 2.0 showed similar MTBC sensitivity compared with FluoroType MTBDR VER 2.0 (manual DNA extraction: 91.6% (294/321) versus 89.8% (291/324); p 0.4); automated DNA extraction: 92.1% (305/331) versus 87.7% (291/332); p 0.05)). FluoroType MTBDR VER2.0 showed comparable diagnostic accuracy to FluoroType MTBDR VER1.0 as previously reported for the detection of MTBC and rifampicin and isoniazid resistance.ConclusionsThe FluoroType MTB and MTBDR VER 2.0 assays together with an automated DNA extraction and PCR set-up platform may improve laboratory operational efficiency for the diagnosis of MTBC and resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid and show promise for the implementation in a centralized molecular drug susceptibility testing model.     

Improved Case Detection Using Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/Rifampicin Assay in Skeletal Tuberculosis

Background: In India, musculoskeletal tuberculosis (TB) accounts for 10%–25% of extrapulmonary TB. Data on drug-resistant skeletal TB are lacking. At present, the diagnosis is based mainly on radiological techniques. Laboratory confirmation of skeletal TB is delayed as 6–8 weeks are required for culture results. Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin (MTB/RIF) assay is a fully automated test which simultaneously detects MTB and RIF resistance within 3 h. Hence, this study was done to compare the yield of case detection using Xpert assay in comparison with culture in specimens received from clinically suspected skeletal TB cases. Methods: Retrospective analysis of microscopy, culture and Xpert assay results was carried out on specimens received in laboratory from skeletal TB cases from January 2016 to December 2017. Results: Of the 201 patients analysed, majority of the specimens were obtained from the spine (55.72%). MTB was detected in 48.68% of tissue and 24% of pus specimens. Xpert assay was detected MTB in 67 (33.33%) specimens of which 53 (47.32%) were from the spine. Culture was detected MTB in 66 (32.83%) specimens. Xpert assay was detected two specimens more than culture. One specimen was positive by only culture. RIF-resistant MTB was detected in 10 (14.92%) specimens by Xpert assay. Conclusion: The spine is the most common site involved. Tissue specimen is better for early diagnosis. High RIF resistance in skeletal TB is an alarming situation. Ability of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for rapid and simultaneous detection of MTB and RIF resistance in comparison with culture makes it a useful diagnostic tool in skeletal TB.     

全自动半巢式实时荧光定量PCR技术检测 BALF诊断肺结核的价值

目的 探讨全自动半巢式实时荧光定量PCR技术（GeneXpert MTB/RIF）检测肺胞灌洗液（BALF）诊断肺结核的价值。方法 采集2016年6月~2018年6月滨州市结核病防治院已经确诊的住院菌阴肺结核269例设为实验组,另收集其他肺部疾病患者87例设为对照组。利用支气管镜术收集肺胞灌洗液;肺胞灌洗液采用涂片法、培养法和GeneXpert MTB/RIF法3种方法检测结核分枝杆菌,分别对其阳性率及检测菌量进行比较。结果 BALF经涂片、培养和GeneXpert MTB/RIF3种方法检测,敏感度分别为23.05%、33.83%和62.08%,特异度分别为97.70%、97.70%和100.00%。GeneXpert MTB/RIF法分别与涂片法和培养法结果比较,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）;涂片法与培养法结果比较,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）;对照组涂片和培养均出现2例阳性者,而GeneXpert MTB/RIF为阴性;涂片和培养相同的2例阳性者,经基因芯片检测确定为NTM。269例菌阴肺结核BALF涂片阴性者207例,207例涂片阴性者经GeneXpert MTB/RIF法检测呈阳性者105例,其中GenXpert MTB/RIF 法“极低”量级50例,占47.62%。269例菌阴肺结核BALF培养阴性者178例,178例涂片阴性者经GeneXpert MTB/RIF法检测呈阳性者76例,其中GenXpert MTB/RIF 法“极低”量级37例,占48.68%。结论 GeneXpert MTB/RIF技术结核分枝杆菌阳性检出率高于涂片和培养法,对早期诊断肺结核具有一定的临床应用价值,且操作简单、快速,值得推广。     

Diagnostic performance and impact of routinely implemented Xpert® MTB/RIF assay in a setting of high incidence of drug-resistant TB in Odessa Oblast,Ukraine

Objectives and methodsThe Xpert® MTB/RIF assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) has been in routine use in Odessa Oblast, a region with the highest tuberculosis (TB) incidence in Ukraine, since 2013. We assessed the performance of the assay in routine settings and evaluated its effect on treatment outcomes.ResultsThe sensitivity of Xpert for TB detection was 93.7% (1165/1243) and 69.5% (448/645) for smear-positive and smear-negative sputum specimens, respectively, and its sensitivity for rifampicin resistance was 93.4% (1212/1298). Median time to TB detection using the Xpert assay was 0 days. Treatment initiation within 1 week increased the proportion of successful outcomes (60.1% versus 25.9%, RR = 1.86, 95%CI = 1.46–2.42), but the introduction of Xpert MTB/RIF has not led to a significant improvement in treatment outcomes (57.2% versus 46.2%; RR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.77–1.12).ConclusionPerformance characteristics of the Xpert assay demonstrated during its routine implementation in an area of high TB and drug-resistant TB incidence in Ukraine were in line with those demonstrated in similar settings elsewhere. Rollout of rapid molecular testing may lead to better treatment results provided that it is implemented in conjunction with other programmatic improvements.     

Performance of Xpert Ultra nasopharyngeal swab for identification of tuberculosis deaths in northern Tanzania

ObjectiveNumerous tuberculosis (TB) deaths remain undetected in low-resource endemic settings. With autopsy-confirmed tuberculosis as our standard, we assessed the diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra; Cepheid) on nasopharyngeal specimens collected postmortem.MethodsFrom October 2016 through May 2019, we enrolled pediatric and adult medical deaths to a prospective autopsy study at two referral hospitals in northern Tanzania with next-of-kin authorization. We swabbed the posterior nasopharynx prior to autopsy and tested the samples later by Ultra. At autopsy we collected lung, liver, and, when possible, cerebrospinal fluid for mycobacterial culture and histopathology. Confirmed tuberculosis was defined as Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex recovery by culture with consistent tissue histopathology findings; decedents with only histopathology findings, including acid-fast staining or immunohistochemistry, were defined as probable tuberculosis.ResultsOf 205 decedents, 78 (38.0%) were female and median (range) age was 45 (0,96) years. Twenty-seven (13.2%) were found to have tuberculosis at autopsy, 22 (81.5%) confirmed and 5 (18.5%) probable. Ultra detected M. tuberculosis complex from the nasopharynx in 21 (77.8%) of 27 TB cases (sensitivity 70.4% [95% confidence interval {CI} 49.8–86.2%], specificity 98.9% [95% CI 96.0–99.9%]). Among confirmed TB, the sensitivity increased to 81.8% (95% CI 59.7–94.8%). Tuberculosis was not included as a death certificate diagnosis in 14 (66.7%) of the 21 MTBc detections by Ultra.DiscussionNasopharyngeal Ultra was highly specific for identifying in-hospital tuberculosis deaths, including unsuspected tuberculosis deaths. This approach may improve tuberculosis death enumeration in high-burden countries.     

Integrating the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay into a Diagnostic Workflow for Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a Low-Prevalence Area

The Xpert MTB/RIF assay is a rapid and fully automated real-time PCR assay. The performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay as a primary screening test for urgent clinical specimens was evaluated during a 2-year period. The results showed that replacing smear microscopy with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay facilitates laboratory handling and improves the sensitivity and specificity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection.     

Comparison of two nucleic acid amplification assays, the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and the amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct assay, for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens

We compared the performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, a new real-time tuberculosis (TB) PCR test, with that of the Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct (MTD) assay using 162 respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens. Based on culture as the gold standard, the overall sensitivity and specificity for all sample types for the Xpert MTB/RIF assay were 90.9 and 89%, respectively, while for the MTD assay, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 97.3 and 87.1%, respectively. A higher proportion of total equivocal results were obtained for the MTD assay, at 10.5% (17/162), while the Xpert MTB/RIF assay generated 5.5% (9/162) of invalid reads.     

Comparison of the Xpert MTB/RIF test with an IS6110-TaqMan real-time PCR assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens

The sensitivities of the Xpert MTB/RIF test and an in-house IS6110-based real-time PCR using TaqMan probes (IS6110-TaqMan assay) for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) DNA were compared by use of 117 clinical specimens (97 culture positive and 20 culture negative for MTBC) that were frozen in sediment. The 97 clinical specimens included 60 respiratory and 37 nonrespiratory specimens distributed into 36 smear-positive and 61 smear-negative specimens. Among the 97 culture-positive specimens, 4 had rifampin-resistant isolates. Both methods were highly specific and exhibited excellent sensitivity (100%) with smear-positive specimens. The sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF test with the whole smear-negative specimens was more reduced than that of the IS6110-TaqMan assay (48 versus 69%, P = 0.005). Both methods exhibited similar sensitivities with smear-negative respiratory specimens, but the Xpert MTB/RIF test had lower sensitivity with smear-negative nonrespiratory specimens than the IS6110-TaqMan assay (37 versus 71%, P = 0.013). Finally, the sensitivities of the Xpert MTB/RIF test and the IS6110-TaqMan assay were 79% and 84%, respectively, with respiratory specimens and 53% and 78%, respectively (P = 0.013), with nonrespiratory specimens. The Xpert MTB/RIF test correctly detected the rifampin resistance in smear-positive specimens but not in the one smear-negative specimen. The Xpert MTB/RIF test is a simple rapid method well adapted to a routine laboratory that appeared to be as sensitive as the IS6110-TaqMan assay with respiratory specimens but less sensitive with paucibacillary specimens, such as smear-negative nonrespiratory specimens.     

Diagnostic Accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Specimens: Establishing a Laboratory Testing Algorithm for South Africa

South Africa implemented Xpert MTB/RIF as the initial diagnostic test for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Xpert MTB/RIF''s accuracy for diagnosing extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) was investigated. EPTB specimens (n = 7,916) from hospitalized patients received over a 6-month period at a high-throughput TB referral laboratory in Johannesburg were investigated. Large-volume specimens were centrifuged, tissue biopsy specimens homogenized, and all specimens checked for growth of contaminating bacteria on blood agar. Contaminated samples received NALC-NaOH (N-acetyl-l-cysteine–sodium hydroxide) decontamination prior to liquid culture. Residual specimens (volumes > 1 ml) after inoculation of culture (n = 1,175) were tested using the Xpert MTB/RIF sputum protocol. Using culture as the reference, Xpert MTB/RIF''s overall sensitivity was 59% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 53% to 65%) and specificity was 92% (CI, 90% to 94%), with the highest sensitivities of 91% (95% CI, 78% to 97%) for pus, 80% (95% CI, 56% to 94%) for lymph node aspirates, and 51% (95% CI, 44% to 58%) for fluids (ascitic, 59%; pleural, 47%). A difference in sensitivities was noticed between specimens classified as having a thick (87% [95% CI, 76% to 94%]) versus clear (watery) (48% [95% CI, 36% to 61%]) appearance. This was unchanged with traces of blood (52% [95% CI, 44% to 60%]) or precentrifugation (57% [95% CI, 28% to 82%]) among clear specimens. Xpert MTB/RIF generated an additional 124 specimen results that were contaminated by Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tubes (MGIT; 10.5%) and diagnosed rifampin (RIF) resistance earlier (9.6% [25/260]). Xpert MTB/RIF''s performance on EPTB specimens provides very promising results and should be considered for incorporation into national TB guidelines. Xpert MTB/RIF is less affected by contaminating bacteria and reduces laboratory labor and diagnostic delay compared to traditional methods.     

Comparison of Xpert MTB/RIF with Line Probe Assay for Detection of Rifampin-Monoresistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The MTBDRplus line probe assay (LPA) and Xpert MTB/RIF have been endorsed by the World Health Organization for the rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis. However, there is no clarity regarding the superiority of one over the other. In a double-blinded prospective study, we evaluated the efficacy of the Xpert MTB/RIF on samples that were first tested by LPA under the revised national tuberculosis control program of India. A total of 405 sputum samples from suspected drug-resistant tuberculosis patients were included. Of these, 285 smear-positive samples were subjected to LPA. Seventy-two (25.8%) samples showed multidrug resistance, 62 (22.2%) showed rifampin monoresistance, 29 (10.3%) showed isoniazid monoresistance, and 116 (41.5%) were pan-susceptible. Six (2.1%) of the samples gave invalid results. Of the 62 rifampin-monoresistant samples by LPA, 38 (61.4%) showed rifampin resistance, while 21 (33.8%) were found susceptible to rifampin by Xpert MTB/RIF using cartridge version G4. Three (4.8%) samples gave an error. Of the 116 pan-susceptible samples, only 83 were available for Xpert MTB/RIF testing; 4 (5.1%) were rifampin resistant, 74 (94.8%) were susceptible, and 5 (6.0%) showed an error. The 25 discrepant samples were further subjected to MGIT960 drug susceptibility testing. The MGIT960 results showed 100% agreement with LPA results but only 64.4% agreement with Xpert MTB/RIF results. Sequencing analysis of discrepant samples showed 91.3% concordance with LPA but only 8.7% concordance with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. These findings indicate that by using Xpert MTB/RIF testing we might be underestimating the burden of drug-resistant tuberculosis and indicate that country-specific probes need to be designed to increase the sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF.     

Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection test and the first-generation Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). In this retrospective study of smear-negative PTB, we reviewed patient medical records to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test, and the parallel test (positive result for either of the Xpert MTB/RIF and CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection tests) to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy against a composite reference standard. In total, 1553 patients were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test, and the parallel test were 57.1%, 92.9%, 81.1%, 95.9%, and 0.75; 53.4%, 97.7%, 98.6%, 41.5%, and 0.76; and 66.2%, 90.8%, 95.5%, 47.7%, and 0.79, respectively. For the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimens, these values for Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test, and the parallel test were 68.8%, 97.7%, 99.2%, 43.9%, and 0.83; 61.7%, 97.7%, 99.1%, 38.9%, and 0.80; and 77.0%, 95.5%, 98.6%, 50.9%, and 0.86, respectively. CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test had moderate accuracy for smear-negative PTB, similar to Xpert MTB/RIF. The parallel test improved the sensitivity. BALF significantly improved the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of the test. The maximum diagnostic accuracy for smear-negative PTB was obtained with the parallel test and BALF specimens. BALF was the most effective specimen for diagnosing smear-negative PTB.

     

The Diagnostic Performance of the GenoType MTBDRplus Version 2 Line Probe Assay Is Equivalent to That of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay

Molecular diagnostics for Mycobacterium tuberculosis have recently been endorsed by the World Health Organization. The Xpert MTB/RIF assay was endorsed for use on patient material, regardless of smear gradation, while the GenoType MTBDRplus (version 1) has been limited for use on smear-positive patient material. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF and GenoType MTBDRplus (version 2) assays on smear-positive and smear-negative patient specimens submitted to a high-throughput diagnostic laboratory. A total of 282 consecutive specimens were subjected to the two new molecular assays, and their performance characteristics were assessed relative to the routine diagnostic standard. Both assays showed similar diagnostic performance characteristics. The sensitivities of the GenoType MTBDRplus (v2.0) and Xpert MTB/RIF assays for the detection of culture-positive M. tuberculosis were 73.1% and 71.2%, respectively, while the specificities of both assays were 100%. Both assays were able to diagnose the presence of M. tuberculosis in 57 to 58% of smear-negative cases, suggesting that the performance characteristics were dependent on bacillary load. The detection of M. tuberculosis in culture-negative specimens confirmed that molecular assays should not be used for treatment monitoring. The sensitivity and specificity for rifampin resistance detection were 100% in both assays; however, the GenoType MTBDRplus (v2.0) assay provided additional information on isoniazid susceptibility. The GenoType MTBDRplus (v2.0) assay will complement the Xpert MTB/RIF screening assay by validating rifampin susceptibility and providing information on isoniazid susceptibility. In addition, the GenoType MTBDRplus (v2.0) assay will provide pharmacogenetic information that may be critical in guiding appropriate treatment.     

The reliability of rifampicin resistance as a proxy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review of studies from Iran

In Iran, patients showing rifampicin (RIF) resistance detected by the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay are considered as candidates for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment. Despite the fact that RIF resistance has been used as a proxy for MDR-TB, little is known about the proportion of isoniazid (INH) resistance patterns in RIF-resistant TB. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and other databases up to March 2017 for studies addressing the proportion of INH resistance patterns in RIF-resistant TB in Iran. The data were pooled using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q and I² statistics. A total of 11 articles met the eligibility criteria. Data analysis demonstrated that 33.3% of RIF-resistant isolates from new TB cases and 14.8% of RIF-resistant isolates from previously treated cases did not display resistance to INH. The relatively high proportion of INH susceptibility among isolates with RIF resistance indicated that RIF resistance may no longer predict MDR-TB in Iran. Therefore, the detection of RIF resistance by the Xpert MTB/RIF assay will require complementary detection of INH resistance by other drug susceptibility testing (DST) methods in order to establish the diagnosis of MDR-TB.