Do Root Lesions Tend to Develop in the Same People Who Develop Coronal Lesions?

Objectives : The three purposes of this study are to: (1) describe the relationship between the prevalence of coronal caries and root caries; (2) describe the relationship between the three-year incidence of coronal caries and root caries; and (3) if the two conditions are associated, develop a multiple regression model that identifies characteristics distinguishing people who had increments of both root caries and coronal caries from people who had increments of either coronal caries or root caries, or who had no new caries. Methods : Dental examinations and interviews were conducted in the homes of a randomly selected, stratified sample of people over the age of 65 years in five North Carolina counties. The relationships between coronal and root D and DF were analyzed through contingency table analyses, and ordinal logistic regression was used to identify characteristics that differentiated people who had both coronal and root D over the three years from people who had either coronal or root D and people who had no new disease. Results : Evidence of root and coronal caries in whites was much more likely to be in the form of fillings, while for blacks, it was more likely to be in the form of untreated decay. Prevalence rates of coronal and root D and DF were significantly associated for both blacks and whites. Incidence rates based on DF indicated that root and coronal caries were not associated in whites, but were associated in blacks. People more likely to experience both types of caries had more gingival recession at baseline, greater average attachment loss over the three years, and lactobacilli at baseline. In addition, the presence of Porphymonas gingivalis at three years was important for whites. Conclusion : It appears that coronal and root caries do tend to appear together in the same individuals, but fillings attenuate that relationship. The impact of dental treatment on the epidemiology of dental caries appears to be considerable and calls into question whether the F component of the caries index is related to disease as defined by epidemiologic criteria.     

Root Caries Prevalence in Black and White North Carolina Adults over Age 65

The baseline root caries prevalence of 809 dentate black and white home-dwelling North Carolinians over age 65 was determined along with the collection of a large number of demographic and behavioral, clinical, and microbiological variables in the longitudinal Piedmont over-age-65 Dental Study. In comparison to other studies of older adults, the prevalence of decayed-filled root surfaces (DFRS) was low, fewer than 2.0 DFRS in whites, and significantly fewer than that in blacks (1.3 DFRS). Although tooth loss was a substantial problem, nearly half of the white population and almost two-thirds of the black participants exhibited no evidence of root caries history. Even though DFRS prevalence was much lower in blacks, their treatment need for decayed root surfaces (DRS) was significantly higher than for white participants. Correlates with DRS within both race groups appeared to be those that reflect lack of access to dental services or neglect of oral health--decayed coronal surfaces, higher rates of tooth extraction, high CPITN scores and worst loss of attachment greater than or equal to 7 mm, and more than a year since the last dental visit. Some variables were associated significantly with one racial group, but not the other, while others, particularly root surfaces at risk and age, were not associated significantly with DRS. We concluded that although there was considerable neglect of root caries, particularly among blacks, it was not a serious problem among older North Carolinians.     

Incidence of tooth loss and dental caries in 60-, 70- and 80-year-old Swedish individuals

Abstract The retention of natural teeth among the elderly is increasing and, in recent studies, dental caries has been identified as the main reason for teeth being extracted. The 5-year incidence of tooth loss and dental caries and the most crucial dental factors for tooth extraction were studied in a random sample of 60-. 70- and 80-year-old inhabitants of Gothenburg, Of the 208 persons examined at baseline, 148 (71%) participated in the follow-up examination: 69, 51 and 28 respectively in the different age groups. In all. 110 teeth had been extracted during the period in 40% of the participants. Only 9 persons had lost three or more teeth. The mean numbers of remaining teeth were 22, 18 and 15 respectively in the 60-, 70- and 80-year age groups and the mean numbers of teeth lost during the 5-year period increased with age from 0.4 in the 60-year-olds to 0.8 and 1.4 in the 70- and 80-year-olds (P<0.05). The major reason for tooth extraction was dental caries and it was found in 60% of all cases and at a higher rate of 77%i in the oldest age group. Fifty-one per cent had developed new coronal carious lesions and 61% had new root carious lesions, while 27% had not developed caries during the period. The mean 5-year increment in decayed and filled coronal surfaces increased with age from 2.3 in the 60-year-olds to 3.7 and 5.3 in the 70- and 80-year-olds (N.S.). The increment in decayed and filled root surfaces was higher in women than men, 3.4 compared with 1.8 (N.S.), which also increased with age from 1.4 in the 60-year-olds to 2.4 and 5.5 in the 70- and 80-year-olds (P<0.0001). It was concluded from this study that few teeth had been lost during the 5-year period but that dental caries still appeared to be a serious problem among some very elderly people.     

Three-year Root Caries Incidence and Risk Modeling in Older Adults in North Carolina

Objectives : The purposes of this study were to describe the incidence of root caries and to identify its risk factors in a representative sample of older adults. Methods : Root caries incidence was estimated and multivariate risk assessment models were developed to identify predictors for root caries in a three-year follow-up study of 234 black and 218 white noninstitutionalized adults aged 65 and older residing in North Carolina. Results : During the observation period, 29 percent of blacks developed root caries, compared to 39 percent of whites (P<.05). The mean net DFS increment per person was 0.55±0.13 root surfaces for blacks vs 0.80±0.21 for whites (P>.32). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that blacks wearing a partial denture, having some root fragments, having an average gingival recession ≥2 mm, and being free of P. intermedia were at greater risk for developing new root caries. The model for whites showed that retired people with their most severe gingival recession ≥4 mm, an average probing pocket depth ≥2 mm, and taking antihistamines were more likely to develop new lesions. Conclusions : These findings suggest that older blacks had less risk of root caries than whites, and in both groups indicators of poor periodontal status increased the risk of root caries.     

Three-year Root Caries Increments: Implications for Clinical Trials

Seven hundred and ninety-six adult subjects (mean age, 39.9 years) received visual-tactile examinations for root caries over a three-year period. All subjects were employed or were the spouses of employees and resided in fluoride-deficient communities on Long Island, New York. During the three-year observation period, 81.4 percent of the subjects did not develop root caries. The 18.6 percent who developed root caries averaged 0.8 DFS/year. The subjects' ages and baseline root DFS status were associated with the development of a root DFS increment. The older the patient, especially aged 45 and older, the greater was the risk of developing root lesions or having root fillings placed. Subjects who had a root DFS score at baseline also were more likely to experience a root DFS increment. It is recommended that when designing clinical trials of agents purported to inhibit root caries, preselection criteria for the study population should consider the subjects' ages and past history of root lesions.     

Race/ethnicity and untreated dental caries: the impact of material and behavioral factors

OBJECTIVE: To use nationally representative data, group variables into categories of material and behavioral factors, and assess their relative contribution to racial/ethnic variation in untreated caries. METHODS: Participants were from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), aged 20-50 years. Material factors were income, education, employment status, dental insurance status, and urban residence. Behavioral factors were marital status, tobacco use, alcohol use, obesity, and social support. All models were additionally adjusted for age, gender, and quartile of missing teeth. The outcome was three or more carious teeth. RESULTS: Non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican-Americans displayed excess risk of untreated caries compared with non-Hispanic whites when adjusted for age, sex, and missing teeth (adjusted odds ratios 1.73 and 1.69, respectively). The addition of behavioral factors to this model resulted in virtually no changes in the adjusted odds ratios for race/ethnicity and untreated caries. When material factors were added to the basic model the excess risk for untreated caries among non-Hispanic blacks was reduced by approximately 21% and that of Mexican-Americans was no longer statistically significant compared with non-Hispanic whites (adjusted odds ratios 1.36 and 0.83, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Much of the excess risk for untreated dental caries among non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican-Americans compared with non-Hispanic whites was eliminated when material factors were controlled, while no risk reductions were observed when behavioral factors were controlled. Addressing material factors may provide greater reductions in untreated caries disparities than behavioral interventions, and these risk reductions may vary with racial/ethnic group.     

Factors associated with caries incidence in an elderly population

The purpose of this paper was to identify baseline factors associated with future caries development in older adults (age 60) during a 3-year study period. Poisson regression analysis was used to determine the association between potential risk factors and disease incidence. The significant factors associated with high coronal caries incidence rates were high baseline root DMFS ( P < 0.001), high counts of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli ( P =0.036), male geder ( P =0.007), and Asian ethnicity ( P < 0.002). These factors had small to moderate effects on incidence rates, with relative risk values of approximately 1.2 to 2 The significant factors associated with higher disease incidence on root surfaces were baseline coronal DMFS (marginally significant, P =0.078), high bacterial counts ( P =0.002), and Asian ethnicity ( P =0.009). The predictive value of the models was low for both coronal and root caries. This result may be because this population had a higher than usual caries incidence rate, making discrimination among these caries-active individuals difficult. The current study affirmed the value of baseline DMFS and salivary variables to modeling caries incidence and introduced ethnicity as a variable useful for the study of dental caries in older adults.     

Root surface and coronal caries in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) on coronal and root surface caries and to investigate some factors suspected of being related to or interacting with DM, that may be associated with coronal and root surface caries. METHODS: A stratified cross-sectional study was conducted in 105 type 2 diabetic patients and 103 non-diabetic subjects of the same age and gender. Coronal and root surface caries, exposed root surfaces, periodontal status, stimulated salivary functions, oral hygiene status, oral health behaviors, and counts of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli were measured. RESULTS: Type 2 diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic subjects had a higher prevalence of root surface caries (40.0% versus 18.5%; P = 0.001), a higher number of decayed/filled root surfaces (1.2 +/- 0.2 versus 0.5 +/- 0.1; P < 0.01) and a higher percentage of generalized periodontitis (98.1% versus 87.4%; P < 0.01); but the prevalence and decayed/filled surface of coronal caries was not significantly different (83.8% versus 72.8% and 8.0 +/- 9.4 versus 6.3 +/- 7.5 respectively). The factors associated with root surface caries included type 2 DM, a low saliva buffer capacity, more missing teeth, and existing coronal caries; whereas wearing removable dentures, more missing teeth, a high number of lactobacilli, and a low saliva buffer capacity were associated with coronal caries. CONCLUSION: Type 2 DM is a significant risk factor for root surface, but not for coronal caries. Periodontal disease should be treated early in type 2 diabetic subjects to reduce the risk of subsequent root surface caries.     

Caries incidence and increments in Adelaide nursing home residents

The objective of The Adelaide Dental Study of Nursing Homes was to quantify coronal and root caries incidence and increments in residents of Adelaide nursing homes. A longitudinal design was used to conduct dental inspections, completed by calibrated dental examiners, for residents of 7 randomly selected nursing homes at both baseline and at one‐year follow‐up. The nursing home residents in this study were very functionally dependent, medically compromised, cognitively impaired and behaviorally difficult older adults. The coronal caries surface incidence was 64.4% and root caries surface incidence was 48.5%. There were 72.1% of residents who had coronal and/or root cartes increments between baseline and one‐year. The coronal and root caries increments in these residents were high (adjusted caries increment = 2.5 coronal and 1.0 root surfaces), and were many times greater than that reported from a longitudinal study of community‐dwelling older adults in Adelaide. Residents with eating and nutritional problems developed high levels of new caries. Both coronal and root caries incidence and increments were high in these nursing home residents over the one‐year follow‐up period.     

Effect of different frequencies of preventive maintenance treatment on dental caries: five-year observations in general dentistry patients

A long-term study in adults at a public dental clinic in Sweden was initiated to evaluate the relative effectiveness of prophylactic treatments on the progression of dental caries and periodontal disease. With treatments scheduled every 3rd, 6th, 12th or 18th month, this report presents results on caries for the 3-month, 6-month and 18-month groups, and evaluates the impact of various caries-related risk factors. Caries increment over approximately 5 years was determined by adding clinical and radiographic findings of manifest primary and secondary caries during the study. Overall caries activity among all 105 participating individuals was low to moderate. No significant differences for caries on any of the various tooth surfaces or for total caries were observed among the three groups. Multiple regression analysis with 5-year caries increment as dependent variable showed that the following factors had a statistically significant association with caries increment: percentage filled surfaces at baseline examination, dietary score, plaque score, and number of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in saliva. Non-significant factors included number of preventive treatments provided during the 5-year interval. The results of this long-term trial suggest that preventive treatments as often as every 3-6 months may not be justified in the case of patients with low to moderate caries activity.     

Prospective study of 5-year caries increment among children receiving comprehensive dental care in the New England children's amalgam trial

Abstract – Objective: To measure the 5‐year caries increment among high‐risk children during their participation in the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial (NECAT), and to evaluate sociodemographic factors that may account for any observed disparities. Methods: NECAT recruited 534 children aged 6–10 with at least two decayed posterior occlusal surfaces from urban Boston and rural Maine. After restoration of baseline caries and application of sealants to sound surfaces, NECAT continued to provide free comprehensive semiannual dental care to participants. The net caries increment of children who completed the 5‐year follow‐up (n = 429) was calculated and predictors of caries increment were investigated using multivariate negative binomial models. Results: The majority of children (89%) experienced new caries by the end of the 5‐year follow‐up. Almost half (45%) had at least one newly decayed surface by the first annual visit. At year 5, the mean number of new decayed teeth was 4.5 ± 3.6 (range 0–25) and surfaces was 6.9 ± 6.5 (range 0–48). Time trends showed a noticeably higher increment rate among older children and young teenagers. Multivariate models showed that age (P < 0.001), number of baseline carious surfaces (P < 0.001), and toothbrushing frequency (<1/day versus ≥2/day, P = 0.04) were associated with caries increment. Only 48 children (11%) did not develop new caries. Conclusions: Despite the receipt of comprehensive semiannual dental care, the vast majority of these high‐risk children continued to develop new caries within 5 years. While disparities were observed by age, extent of prior decay, and toothbrushing frequency, no other sociodemographic factors were associated with caries increment, suggesting that the dental care provided during the trial reduced sociodemographic disparities in prior caries experience that were observed at baseline.     

Distribution of coronal and root caries experience among persons aged 60+ in South Australia

This report provides epidemiological data describing caries experience among the population of noninstitutionalized older adults in Adelaide and Mt Gambier. Subjects were selected in a stratified random sample of persons aged 60+ who were listed on the South Australian Electoral Database. Oral examinations were conducted by four calibrated dentists among 853 dentate persons aged 60 years and over. There was an average of 14.7 missing teeth, 8.3 filled teeth and 0.3 decayed teeth, and a further 0.2 teeth were present as retained roots. The mean number of missing teeth was higher (p<0.05) in older compared with younger age groups, and in Mt Gambier compared with Adelaide. The mean DFS of 22.1 was significantly higher (p<0.05) among younger persons, females and in Adelaide. Root surface caries affected an average of 3.1 surfaces, and was greater (p<0.05) among persons aged 70–79 years, males and Adelaide residents. However, when root caries was expressed as an attack rate per 100 exposed surfaces, differences were statistically significant only among age groups. Analysis of specific teeth revealed that no more than 40 per cent of molars were retained, and between 30 and 58 per cent of retained molars had coronal fillings.     

The relationship between restorative treatment provided and a one year increment of the F component in the DMF index

Abstract There is considerable debate over the estimate of true increment of caries in an adult population derived from a conventional epidemiological study. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the increment of restorative treatment provided by dentists for caries with an estimate of what would have been recorded in a conventional epidemiological study as FT(S). The two types of increment were calculated from data collected for 3,920 regularly attending adults over the age of 25 years receiving dental treatment from 24 general dental practitioners. The adults were treated by their dentists prior to baseline so that, in the dentists' opinions, there were no caries lesions requiring restoration. All treatment carried out over the next 12 months together with the reasons for this, were recorded by the dentists. The increments for all restorative treatments and those considered by the dentist to be related to caries were calculated and compared with the conventional epidemiological FT and FS increments, calculated as changes from sound at baseline to restore for both teeth and surfaces. The results showed that the epidemiological FT and FS increments under-estimated both the total restorative treatment and that provided for caries by the dentists.     

Reduction in caries rate among patients with xerostomia using a power toothbrush

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a Sonicare*** toothbrush could be beneficiai in reducing coronal and/or root caries among patients with medication-induced xerostomia.
Eighty subjects with drug-induced xerostomia using either a Sonicare toothbrush (SC) or a manual toothbrush (MTB) were included in the study. Control subjects using a MTB were frequency-matched to 40 subjects using a SC, based on age, gender, number of teeth at baseline, and salivary flow rates. Subjects were individually matched according to the type of xerostomic medication they were taking. Caries were assessed at baseline, and subjects were instructed to have carious teeth restored. Summary statistics were assessed and computed by treatment group for incipient and frank coronal and root caries after one year. Statistical comparisons of the number of frank and incipient coronal and root caries between treatment groups were conducted using paired t -tests.
After one year of use, the numbers of incipient and frank root caries were significantly lower among subjects using SC compared to subjects using MTB. Subjects using SC also exhibited somewhat lower incipient and frank coronal caries than subjects using MTB, although their differences were not statistically significant.
The authors concluded that the Sonicare toothbrush may be beneficial in reducing root caries among older adults with medication-induced xerostomia.     

Caries prevalence,severity, and 3‐year increment,and their impact upon New Zealand adolescents' oral‐health‐related quality of life

Objective: To examine dental caries experience among New Zealand adolescents and determine the nature of caries‐associated differences in oral‐health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) among adolescents. Method: Follow‐up was conducted of a random sample of 430 children first examined in 2003 at age 13, when they completed the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ_11‐14). At age 16, 255 (59.3% of the baseline sample) were re‐examined and again completed the CPQ_11‐14. Results: Caries prevalence (1 + DMFS) rose from 68% to 79.2%; mean DMFS rose from 2.9 (SD 4.7) to 3.6 (SD 4.8), and the prevalence of high caries experience (5 + DMFS) rose from 20.0% to 40.8%. The 3‐year mean net caries increment of 0.5 surfaces (SD 2.6) was dominated by occlusal surfaces. At both ages, overall CPQ_11‐14 scores, as well as emotional well‐being subscale scores, were significantly higher for those with DMFS values of 5 or more. Conclusion: Caries experience increased over the three years; this age group is caries‐active. Dental caries affects adolescents' OHRQoL, although not as strongly as maybe expected.     

Association between untreated caries and age, gender and dental attendance in adults

Abstract – The aim of the study was to examine the association between untreated caries on the crown and root of the tooth with the age, gender and dental attendance in a group of adult. Six general practitioners in the Greater Manchester area agreed to take part. Over a 6-week period they collected clinical and personal data on 270 of their adult patients. No association was found between the mean number of coronal surfaces with caries and age; however, there was more root caries in people over 55 yr. More recurrent caries associated with a restoration was diagnosed than primary caries. There were proportionally more female than male regular attenders, and once attendance has been taken into account there were no gender differences for either coronal or root caries. Both coronal and root caries were associated with attendance, with irregular attenders experiencing more. Irregular attenders were three and a half times more likely to have caries on the root surfaces than regular attenders.     

Estimating rates of new root caries in older adults

Although older adults are keeping their teeth longer, no national data are available on new caries in this age group. To characterize the extent of caries among older adults, we systematically reviewed studies on root caries incidence, increment, attack rate, and annual total (root + coronal) caries increment. We used a random-effects model to estimate annual summary measures and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and tested for heterogeneity. For the 9 studies reporting root caries incidence, the summary measure equaled 23.7% (CI = 17.1-30.2%). For the 9 studies reporting root caries increment, the summary measure was 0.47 surfaces (CI = 0.34-0.61). For the 7 studies reporting total caries increment, the summary measure equaled 1.31 surfaces (95% CI = 1.01-1.61 surfaces). Because of heterogeneity, summary measures should be interpreted with caution. This research suggests, however, that older adults experience high rates of new caries and could benefit from caries-prevention programs.     

Relationship between root caries and coronal decay

The relationship between caries on root surfaces and untreated coronal lesions was analyzed. A representative sample of 5028 persons was examined, their mean ages being 47.3 years for men and 47.7 for women. Poor dental health on root surfaces was associated with poor dental health in the coronal areas of the teeth. Subjects with root caries had fewer teeth and fewer fillings, more retained roots and more teeth with untreated coronal decay than did people with no root caries. Compared with the subjects without untreated coronal decay, those with from one to three decayed coronal surfaces showed an odds ratio of 4.5 of having caries on root surfaces. This ratio was 10.1 for the subjects who had more than three decayed coronal surfaces. It was concluded that factors related to the occurrence of decay are of a similar type whether caries is situated on root surfaces or in the coronal areas of the teeth, and therefore the prevention of caries in both sites may be accomplished by similar means.     

Epidemiological assessment of predictors of caries increment in 7-10-year-olds: a 2-year cohort study

Objective

The aim of this 2-year cohort study (2003 to 2005) was to investigate how caries experience, at initial lesions (early or non-cavited lesions) and cavited stages, predicts caries increment in permanent teeth in 7-10- year-olds.

Material and Methods

The random sample of 765 children attending public schools in the city of Piracicaba, SP, Brazil, was divided into two groups: 423 children aged 7-8 years and 342 children aged 9-10 years. All subjects were examined by a calibrated examiner, using dental mirror and ball-ended probes, after tooth brushing and air-drying in an outdoor setting, based on the World Health Organization criteria. Active caries with intact surfaces were also recorded as initial lesion (IL). Univariate analysis was used for statistical analysis (Odds Ratios and Chisquare).

Results

The association between the DMFT (decayed, missing and filled teeth) increment and the presence of IL was significant only for 9-10-year-old children. The children with DMFT>0 at baseline were more prone to have DMFT increment, with the highest risk for caries increment occurring in children aged 7-8 years.

Conclusion

The predictors of caries increment were the presence (at baseline) of caries experience in permanent teeth for both age groups (7-8; 9-10-year-olds) and the presence of the IL (at baseline) for 9-10-year-olds.     

A two-year longitudinal study of dental caries in permanent first molars of Korean elementary schoolchildren

OBJECTIVE: This longitudinal study investigated dental caries increment in permanent first molars of Korean elementary schoolchildren. METHODS: A convenience sample of 722 children aged 7-9 years attending one urban elementary school was examined at baseline, with follow-up examinations at one and two years. Coronal surfaces of permanent first molars were scored with regard to caries experience and sealant status. RESULTS: Among sound occlusal surfaces at baseline, 21 percent of upper and 25 percent of lower surfaces developed caries during the two-year interval. In teeth that erupted between baseline and the first follow-up exam, over 10 percent of occlusal surfaces developed caries. Pit and fissure caries accounted for 93 percent of all new carious surfaces, while sealants had been placed on 16 percent of occlusal surfaces during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing the limitations of this convenience sample, dental sealants should be used more widely in this Korean population, and should be applied soon after tooth eruption.