Tobacco use following liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: an underestimated problem.

Alcohol and tobacco use commonly co-occur, with at least 90% of those with an alcohol problem also using tobacco. Thus, 3 years ago when we discovered higher rate of late deaths due to lung and oropharyngeal cancer in patients who had received a transplant for alcoholic liver disease (ALD), we hypothesized that these patients were continuing to expose themselves to tobacco after liver transplantation (post-LTX) and that this behavior was increasing their risk for cancer. We subsequently began a prospective investigation of post-LTX tobacco use in patients having undergone LTX for ALD (n = 172). For 33 recipients we had data starting from our first assessment at 3 months post-LTX and for this subgroup we report on the details of the timing of tobacco use resumption and the redevelopment of nicotine addiction. We found that on average more than 40% are smoking across all time periods. ALD recipients resume smoking early post-LTX, increase their consumption over time, and quickly become tobacco dependent. These data highlight an underrecognized serious health risk for these patients and demonstrate our need for more stringent clinical monitoring and intervention for tobacco use in the pre- and post-LTX periods.     

An ‘alcohol contract’ has no significant effect on return to drinking after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

Return to drinking after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease (ALD) remains a source of unease with varying reported rates of return to drinking and impact this has on graft function. In 2005, the UK Transplant liver advisory group recommended an ‘alcohol contract’ in which ALD patients listed for transplantation confirmed in writing their commitment to abstinence. We aimed to measure the rates and consequences of return to drinking alcohol in a UK transplant programme and assess the effect of the ‘alcohol contract’. Consecutive patients transplanted for ALD during 1996–2011 were included. Every patient listed after Feb 2007 signed up to the ‘alcohol contract’. We compared rates and pattern of return to drinking and survival before and after the introduction of the contract. Overall, 52 (37%) patients returned to drinking alcohol; 37 (39%) before and 15 (34%) after the contract. There was no significant difference in the rate of return or pattern of drinking. Median survival was 176 months (145–207 95% CI). There was no significant difference in survival, mortality rates, or in the causes of death in either group. We report high rates of return to drinking alcohol in a UK liver transplant programme. Despite this, the impact on patient and graft survival is low. There is no evidence that an ‘alcohol contract’ has had any effect on alcohol consumption.     

Trajectories of Alcohol Consumption Following Liver Transplantation

Any use of alcohol in the years following liver transplantation (LTX) approaches 50% of patients transplanted for alcoholic liver disease (ALD). We collected detailed prospective data on alcohol consumption following LTX for ALD to investigate ongoing patterns of use. Using trajectory modeling we identified four distinct alcohol use trajectories. One group had minimal use over time. Two other groups developed early onset moderate‐to‐heavy consumption and one group developed late onset moderate use. These trajectories demonstrate that alcohol use varies based on timing of onset, quantity and duration. Using discriminant function analysis, we examine characteristics of recipient's pre‐LTX alcohol histories and early post‐LTX psychological stressors to identify the profile of those at risk for these specific trajectories. We discuss the relevance of these findings to clinical care and preliminarily to outcomes.     

Efficacy of 6-month pretransplant abstinence for patients with alcoholic liver disease undergoing living donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE: Questions have been raised regarding the ethics of liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD), including the fairness of cadaveric organ allocation to individuals who abuse alcohol and the efficacy of transplantation in these patients, many of whom may relapse. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for ALD patients raises the similar ethical issues. ALD candidates for cadaveric liver transplants are required to abstain from alcohol for 6 months before being listed, but the efficacy of 6 months of abstinence in ALD patients receiving LDLT is not known. METHODS: We therefore determined the efficacy of 6 months of pretransplant abstinence in 15 ALD patients who underwent LDLT from February 1997 to December 2003. RESULTS: The Model for End-stage Liver Disease score was 24 +/- 10, and mean pretransplant abstinence period was 15 +/- 13 months, with 11 (73.3%) patients being abstinent for at least 6 months. Four patients received dual grafts, making the number of living donors 19: 12 children, two wives, one brother, three nephews, and one aunt. There were no unrelated donors. Three patients showed a relapse to alcohol drinking. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 100%, 100%, and 87.5%, respectively, and the cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year relapse rates were 6.7%, 20%, and 20%, respectively. The relapse rates in patients who did and did not maintain 6 months of abstinence were 9.1% and 50%, respectively; this difference was not significant (P = .154), likely due to the small sample size. Younger recipient age was a significant risk factor for alcohol relapse (40 +/- 8 years versus 53 +/- 6 years; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Pretransplant abstinence of 6 months seemed to be beneficial. For ethical reasons, a 6-month abstinence rule should be strictly observed in LDLT.     

Negative outcomes after liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic liver disease beyond the fifth post‐transplant year

Although up to 50% of patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) resume alcohol consumption after liver transplantation (LT), numerous studies indicate that long‐term results are not compromised. This study focused on evaluating the impact of ALD on outcomes up to and beyond the fifth year after LT. Among the 432 primary LT recipients included in this study, 97 underwent transplantation for ALD. Alcohol relapse rate at 10 yr was 33.5%, with younger recipient age being the only independent predictor (p = 0.019). Survival of patients with ALD (77.0%) was similar to those without (79.0%) up to the fifth post‐transplant year (p = 0.655) but worse during the five subsequent years among the five‐yr survivors (70.6% vs. 92.9%; p = 0.002). ALD was an independent risk factor for poorer survival beyond the fifth post‐transplant year (p = 0.049), but not earlier (p = 0.717). Conversely, alcohol relapse increased the risk of death only during the first five post‐transplant years (p = 0.039). There were no significant differences regarding graft failure incidence between ALD and non‐ALD recipients up to the fifth post‐transplant year (7.3% vs. 11.6%; p = 0.255) and beyond (12.9% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.126). In conclusion, pre‐transplant diagnosis of ALD yields negative effects on post‐transplant outcomes beyond the fifth post‐transplant year, not attributable to recidivism.     

Long‐term medical and psycho‐social evaluation of patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

Abstract The major concern in transplanting patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is the high rate of alcohol recidivism. Our aim was to assess the long‐term outcome of liver transplantation (OLT) in a group of ALD patients in terms of post‐OLT alcohol recidivism and its relationship with pre‐OLT psychosocial variables and medical follow up. Fifty‐one ALD patients underwent strict medical and psychosocial evaluation before and after OLT. Alcohol abuse was recorded in 60% and alcohol dependence in 40% of patients before OLT. The 5‐year survival was similar to the one observed in non‐ALD transplanted patients (64 vs 56%). Alcohol recidivism was observed in 33 % of transplanted patients, 64 % of whom were occasional and 36 % were heavy drinkers. The admission of alcoholism by the patient and his/her family prior to OLT significantly predicted abstinence after OLT. A multidisciplinary approach evaluating medical and psycho‐social variables before OLT and a close follow up after OLT are mandatory for ALD patients.     

Alcohol recidivism impairs long-term patient survival after orthotopic liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of alcohol recidivism after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and its influence on the allograft and patient survival, as well as the development of comorbidities and de novo cancers. The study was performed on 54 subjects previously analyzed and transplanted in our center for ALD, whose follow-up was prolonged to a mean of 99.2 (SD 31.7) months (range, 14-155). Medical records were reviewed, and data on alcohol consumption, therapeutic compliance, graft evolution, rejection, infections, comorbidities, rates of de novo malignancies and other clinical events, and survival were collected. Comparisons between groups were performed by the Fisher's exact test, and survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves were compared using the Mantel-Cox statistic. The risk of death resulting from alcohol recidivism was analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards model. Fourteen patients who underwent transplantation for ALD (25.9%) returned to alcohol use between 5.0 and 86.9 months after OLT (median, 47.5). There was no significant association between the presence or absence of alcohol recidivism and the occurrence of graft rejection, infections, associated comorbidities after OLT, or compliance. The 5- and 10-year survival rates for patients with alcohol recidivism were 92.9% and 45.1%, respectively, compared with 92.4% and 85.5%, respectively, for patients without alcohol recidivism. These figures show significantly lower survival rates in recidivistic patients after 10 years (P < 0.01, Mantel-Cox). The fact that patients who resumed alcohol consumption have a worse 10-year survival rate might be attributed to a higher frequency of deaths, primarily from cancer and cardiovascular events.     

Are preoperative patterns of alcohol consumption predictive of relapse after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease?

Predictive factors for alcoholic relapse after liver transplantation (LT) performed for alcoholic liver disease (ALD) have been assessed in numerous studies, often with contradictory results. The aim of the study was to assess pretransplantation alcohol consumption characteristics on alcoholic relapse after LT. Patients transplanted for ALD for at least 6 months were included. An anonymous questionnaire assessed socio-demographic characteristics, medical history, and alcohol consumption before and after LT. Relapse was defined as any alcohol use after LT. Severe relapse was defined by heavy drinking: more than 21 units/week for males and 14 units/week for females. A total of 61 patients were studied. The mean follow up after LT was 49 +/- 34 months. Alcoholic relapse occurred in 32 of 61 patients (52%) and severe relapse in eight of 61 patients (13%). Risk factors for severe relapse were: length of abstinence before LT (P = 0.0001), more than one alcohol withdrawal before LT (P = 0.001), alcohol dependence (P = 0.05), alcohol abuse in first relatives (P = 0.05), and younger age (P = 0.05). Information on previous alcohol consumption (dependence, number of withdrawals, family history) helps to predict severe relapse after LT in patients with ALD, allowing early awareness and specific postoperative care.     

Good outcome after liver transplantation for ALD without a 6 months abstinence rule prior to transplantation including post‐transplant CDT monitoring for alcohol relapse assessment – a retrospective study

Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is the second most common indication for liver transplantation (LT). The utility of fixed intervals of abstinence prior to listing is still a matter of discussion. Furthermore, post‐LT long‐term observation is challenging, and biomarkers as carbohydrate‐deficient transferrin (CDT) may help to identify alcohol relapse. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients receiving LT for ALD from 1996 to 2012. A defined period of alcohol abstinence prior to listing was not a precondition, and abstinence was evaluated using structured psychological interviews. A total of 382 patients received LT for ALD as main (n = 290) or secondary (n = 92) indication; median follow‐up was 73 months (0–213). One‐ and five‐year patient survival and graft survival rates were 82% and 69%, and 80% and 67%, respectively. A total of 62 patients (16%) experienced alcohol relapse. Alcohol relapse did not have a statistically significant effect on patient survival (P = 0.10). Post‐transplant CDT measurements showed a sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 85%, respectively. In conclusion, this large single‐center analysis showed good post‐transplant long‐term results in patients with ALD when applying structured psychological interviews before listing. Relapse rates were lower than those reported in the literature despite using a strict definition of alcohol relapse. Furthermore, post‐LT CDT measurement proved to be a useful supplementary tool for detecting alcohol relapse.     

Evolution of Causes and Risk Factors for Mortality Post‐Liver Transplant: Results of the NIDDK Long‐Term Follow‐Up Study

Although mortality rates following liver transplantation (LT) are well described, there is a lack of detailed, prospective studies determining patterns of and risk factors for long‐term mortality. We analyzed the multicenter, prospectively obtained The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases LT Database of 798 transplant recipients from 1990 to 1994 (follow‐up 2003). Overall, 327 recipients died. Causes of death >1 year: 28% hepatic, 22% malignancy, 11% cardiovascular, 9% infection, 6% renal failure. Renal‐related death increased dramatically over time. Risk factors for death >1 year (univariate): male gender, age/decade, pre‐LT diabetes, post‐LT diabetes, post‐LT hypertension, post‐LT renal insufficiency, retransplantation >1 year, pre‐LT malignancy, alcoholic disease (ALD) and metabolic liver disease, with similar risks noted for death >5 years. Hepatitis C, retransplantation, post‐LT diabetes, hypertension and renal insufficiency were significant risk factors for liver‐related death. Cardiac deaths associated with age, male gender, ALD, cryptogenic disease, pre‐LT hypertension and post‐LT renal insufficiency. In summary, the leading causes of late deaths after transplant were graft failure, malignancy, cardiovascular disease and renal failure. Older age, diabetes and renal insufficiency identified patients at highest risk of poor survival overall. Diligent management of modifiable post‐LT factors including diabetes, hypertension and renal insufficiency may impact long‐term mortality.     

Aggressive surgical approach to recurrent tumors after hepatectomy for metastatic spread of colorectal cancer to the liver

BACKGROUND: Liver resection is currently accepted as the only potential cure for patients with metastases of colorectal tumors in the liver. However, cancer will recur in more than 70% of patients. METHODS: In the 7 years to December 1997, 60 patients underwent liver resections for colorectal metastases at our institute. Of these, 20 patients had repeated surgical resections for recurrent disease of the liver and other organs. Another 2 patients had undergone previous hepatectomy elsewhere. The clinical data for these patients were reviewed. RESULTS: The median interval between the 2 resections was 16 months. Eighteen hepatectomies, 6 lung resections, and 1 pancreatoduodenectomy were performed in 22 patients. Operative mortality and complication rates were 0% and 18%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 25 months after repeated resection, the survival rate in these patients was 73% at 2 years (12 of 16 evaluable patients are surviving) and 22% at 5 years (2 of 10 evaluable patients are surviving); the median survival time was 44 months. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated resections for recurrent colorectal metastases yield comparable results to first liver resections in operative mortality and morbidity rates, survival time, and pattern of recurrence. Although the number of patients surviving more than 5 years is still limited, the absence of other proven treatments supports the concept of an aggressive resectional approach for these patients.     

Selection criteria related to long‐term survival following liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastasis

Patients with nonresectable colorectal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy have a 5‐year overall survival rate of about 10%. Liver transplant provided a Kaplan‐Meier–estimated 5‐year overall survival of up to 83%. The objective of the study was to evaluate the ability of different scoring systems to predict long‐term overall survival after liver transplant. Patients with colorectal cancer with nonresectable liver‐only metastases determined by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging/positron emission tomography (PET)‐CT scans from 2 prospective studies (SECA‐I and ‐II) were included. All included patients had previously received chemotherapy. PET‐CT was performed within 90 days of the liver transplant. Overall survival, disease‐free survival, and survival after relapse based on the Fong Clinical Risk Score, total PET liver uptake (metabolic tumor volume), and Oslo Score were compared. At median follow‐up of 85 months for live patients, Kaplan‐Meier overall survival rates at 5 years were 100%, 78%, and 67% in patients with Fong Clinical Risk Score 0 to 2, metabolic tumor volume–low group, and Oslo Score 0 to 2, respectively. Median overall survival was 101, 68, and 65 months in patients with Fong Clinical Risk Score 0 to 2, metabolic tumor volume–low, and Oslo Score 0 to 2. These selection criteria may be used to obtain 5‐year overall survival rates comparable to other indications for liver transplant.     

Long-term follow-up after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease under tacrolimus

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LTx) for alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is an accepted modality of treatment and is one of the most common indications for LTx in the United States. The present report examines the long-term patient survival, graft survival, rates of recidivism, and development of de novo cancers in this group, and compares these results with a contemporaneous group of patients who were transplanted for non-ALD indications. METHODS: Between August 1989 and December 1992, 185 adults received LTx for ALD (group I). During the same time interval, 649 adults received LTx for non-ALD (group II). The mean follow-up time was 94+/-10.7 months for group I vs. 92+/-11 months for group II. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and the incidence of cancers using Surveillance Epidemiologic End Result data were compared in both groups. RESULTS: At 5 years after orthotopic LTx, the overall patient survival and graft survival for group I were 72.0% and 66.5% vs. 66.5% and 60.3% for group II, respectively. After 5 years, the patient survival and graft survival for the alcoholic group were significantly lower (P=0.001) compared to the non-alcoholic group. The rate of de novo oropharyngeal cancer and lung cancer was 25.5 times and 3.7 times higher, respectively, in ALD group compared with the general population matched for age, sex, and length of follow-up (P=0.001), whereas this was not higher in the non-ALD group. Prior pretransplant length of sobriety and alcohol rehabilitation was not associated with the rate of post-LTx rate of recidivism, which was 20%. Out of 79 deaths in group I, only 1 was attributed to recidivism and 3 to noncompliance with recidivism. The other deaths occurred from de novo cancer (n=13), posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (n=5), age-related complications (n=23), and other infection or miscellaneous causes (n=34). CONCLUSIONS: Patient and graft survival past 5 years after orthotopic LTx is significantly lower for ALD for a variety of reasons (P=0.001). The rate of upper airway malignances was significantly higher in ALD patients than for non-ALD post-LTx patients and the general public. Graft loss/death related to recidivism or chronic rejection was extremely low. More attention is needed for early diagnosis of de novo cancer and prevention of cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular complications.     

One hundred nine living donor liver transplants in adults and children: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the evolution of a living donor liver transplant program and the authors' experience with 109 cases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The authors' institution began to offer living donor liver transplants to children in 1993 and to adults in 1998. METHODS: Donors were healthy, ages 18 to 60 years, related or unrelated, and ABO-compatible (except in one case). Donor evaluation was thorough. Liver biopsy was performed for abnormal lipid profiles or a history of significant alcohol use, a body mass index more than 28, or suspected steatosis. Imaging studies included angiography, computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Recipient evaluation and management were the same as for cadaveric transplant. RESULTS: After ABO screening, 136 potential donors were evaluated for 113 recipients; 23 donors withdrew for medical or personal reasons. Four donor surgeries were aborted; 109 transplants were performed. Fifty children (18 years or younger) received 47 left lateral segments and 3 left lobes; 59 adults received 50 right lobes and 9 left lobes. The average donor hospital stay was 6 days. Two donors each required one unit of banked blood. Right lobe donors had three bile leaks from the cut surface of the liver; all resolved. Another right lobe donor had prolonged hyperbilirubinemia. Three donors had small bowel obstructions; two required operation. All donors are alive and well. The most common indications for transplant were biliary atresia in children (56%) and hepatitis C in adults (40%); 35.6% of adults had hepatocellular carcinoma. Biliary reconstructions in all children and 44 adults were with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy; 15 adults had duct-to-duct anastomoses. The incidence of major vascular complications was 12% in children and 11.8% in adult recipients. Children had three bile leaks (6%) and six (12%) biliary strictures. Adult patients had 14 (23.7%) bile leaks and 4 (6.8%) biliary strictures. Patient and graft survival rates were 87.6% and 81%, respectively, at 1 year and 75.1% and 69.6% at 5 years. In children, patient and graft survival rates were 89.9% and 85.8%, respectively, at 1 year and 80.9% and 78% at 5 years. In adults, patient and graft survival rates were 85.6% and 77%, respectively, at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Living donor liver transplantation has become an important option for our patients and has dramatically changed our approach to patients with liver failure. The donor surgery is safe and can be done with minimal complications. We expect that living donor liver transplants will represent more than 50% of our transplants within 3 years.     

Highly urgent liver transplantation: possible impact of donor-recipient ABO matching on the outcome after transplantation

BACKGROUND: Survival after liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure has been reported to be less favorable than survival for patients with chronic liver diseases. METHODS: We have studied all patients (n=229) undergoing highly urgent liver transplantation from 1990 to 2001 in the Nordic countries. The impact of patient and donor characteristics, with emphasis on donor-recipient ABO matching (identical, compatible, incompatible), has been studied. RESULTS: One-year and 3-year patient survival rates were 73% and 70% for the total period and 86% and 78% for the last 4-year period. Patients receiving an ABO-compatible liver allograft had significantly lower patient survival rates than those receiving an ABO-identical donor organ (1-year patient survival rates 66% of vs. 79%, P=0.03). Graft survival rates varied less (1-year graft survival rates of 64% vs. 74%, P=0.09). Patients receiving an ABO-incompatible liver allograft had patient survival rates of 70% at 1 year and 60% at 3 years but low graft survival rates (40% and 30% at 1 and 3 years). In a multiple regression analysis, significant independent predictors of poor patient survival were early year of transplantation, ABO-compatible donor, high donor age, and waiting time more than 3 days and less than 9 days. CONCLUSION: Survival after highly urgent liver transplantation has improved and is comparable to that observed in patients receiving a liver allograft because of chronic liver disease. Patients receiving an ABO-identical donor organ had significantly higher patient survival rates compared with those receiving an ABO-compatible donor liver.     

Liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis: long term follow-up and impact of disease recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Alcoholic liver disease has emerged as a leading indication for hepatic transplantation, although it is a controversial use of resources. We aimed to examine all aspects of liver transplantation associated with alcohol abuse. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of 123 alcoholic patients with a median of 7 years follow-up at one center. RESULTS: In addition to alcohol, 43 (35%) patients had another possible factor contributing to cirrhosis. Actuarial patient and graft survival rates were, respectively, 84% and 81% (1 year); 72% and 66% (5 years); and 63% and 59% (7 years). After transplantation, 18 patients (15%) manifested 21 noncutaneous de novo malignancies, which is significantly more than controls (P=0.0001); upper aerodigestive squamous carcinomas were overrepresented (P=0.03). Thirteen patients had definitely relapsed and three others were suspected to have relapsed. Relapse was predicted by daily ethanol consumption (P=0.0314), but not by duration of pretransplant sobriety or explant histology. No patient had alcoholic hepatitis after transplantation and neither late onset acute nor chronic rejection was significantly increased. Multiple regression analyses for predictors of graft failure identified major biliary/vascular complications (P=0.01), chronic bile duct injury on biopsy (P=0.002), and pericellular fibrosis on biopsy (P=0.05); graft viral hepatitis was marginally significant (P=0.07) on univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Alcoholic liver disease is an excellent indication for liver transplantation in those without coexistent conditions. Recurrent alcoholic liver disease alone is not an important cause of graft pathology or failure. Potential recipients should be heavily screened before transplantation for coexistent conditions (e.g., hepatitis C, metabolic diseases) and other target-organ damage, especially aerodigestive malignancy, which are greater causes of morbidity and mortality than is recurrent alcohol liver disease.     

Carbohydrate deficient transferrin for detection of alcohol relapse after orthotopic liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis.

Early diagnosis and monitoring of an alcohol relapse in patients after orthotopic liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis is of importance for the long-term outcome. A prospective study of 97 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplant for alcoholic cirrhosis has been performed. All of the recipients considered for analysis survived for at least 3 months and were under the care of one specialist psychologist. Mean follow-up amounted to 48.5+/-1.4 months. The rates of alcohol relapse at 1 and 3 years after orthotopic liver transplant were 6 and 9%, respectively. Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin is a biological marker for alcohol abuse independently of liver disease and has been used for the first time ever in liver graft recipients. A total of 830 values were included prospectively in the study population. Detection of alcohol relapse had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 98%. Changes in carbohydrate-deficient transferrin levels indicated clandestine and sporadic drinking after transplantation. Furthermore, clinical events were not found to influence carbohydrate-deficient transferrin, either in patients with or without alcoholic relapse. In our opinion, carbohydrate-deficient transferrin is a useful screening marker for alcohol relapse in patients after orthotopic liver transplant for alcoholic cirrhosis, to select those patients who need special attention from the psychologist.     

Pediatric living donor liver transplantation

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze the results of living donor in a pediatric liver transplantation program. PATIENTS: Twenty-six living donor liver transplantations were performed in children from 0.5 to 14.8 years of age. The main indication was biliary atresia (72%) followed by tumors (2 hepatoblastomas and 1 hepatocarcinoma). Left lateral segments were used in 23 (1 transformed into a monosegment), 1 left lobe was used in 1, and right lobes were used in 2. Arterial reconstruction employed saphenous venous grafts in the first 3 cases and end-to-end anastomoses with a microsurgical technique in the following 22 cases. RESULTS: There has been no major morbidity in the donors, with a median hospitalization of 6 days. Four grafts have been lost; 2 in the first 3 cases. In only 1 case, the graft loss was related to the procedure saphenous venous graft thrombosis). Early biliary complications were frequent (23%). Six month, 1 year, and 5 year graft and patient survival rates were 91%, 85%, and 85% and 100%, 96%, and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Living donor liver transplantation is an excellent option for transplantation in children.