Mechanisms of action of the organic nitrates in the treatment of myocardial ischemia.

Nitroglycerin and the long-acting nitrates are widely used in all of the anginal syndromes and have proven effectiveness in relieving or preventing myocardial ischemia. Recent developments into nitrate mechanisms of action provide new insights as to the many anti-ischemic effects of these agents. Important concepts relating to coronary arterial endothelial function are germane to nitrate therapy. Endothelial-derived relaxing factor (EDRF) is presently believed to be nitric oxide (NO), which exerts vasodilatory and/or antiplatelet actions by increasing intracellular cyclic guanosine monophosphate as a result of activation of the enzyme guanylate cyclase. In the setting of coronary atherosclerosis, or even hyperlipidemia without histologic vascular disease, endothelial dysfunction may be present, promoting a vasoconstrictor/proplatelet aggregatory milieu. Nitroglycerin and the organic nitrates are NO donors; NO is the final product of nitrate metabolism, and in the vascular smooth muscle NO induces relaxation, resulting in vasodilation of arteries and veins. In the presence of inadequate EDRF production and/or release, it appears that nitroglycerin may partially replenish EDRF-like activity. Nitrates have long been known to have major peripheral circulatory actions resulting in a marked decrease in cardiac work. Venodilation and arterial relaxation result in a decrease in intracardiac chamber size and pressures, with a resultant decrease in myocardial oxygen consumption. In addition, a variety of direct coronary circulatory actions of the nitrates have been documented. These include not only epicardial coronary artery dilation, but the prevention of coronary vasoconstriction, enhanced collateral flow, and coronary stenosis enlargement. Recent work suggests that the nitrates may also act by preventing distal coronary artery or collateral vasoconstriction, which can reduce blood flow downstream from a total coronary obstruction. Thus, there are many anti-ischemic mechanisms of action by which nitroglycerin and the organic nitrates may be beneficial in both acute and chronic ischemic heart disease syndromes. The unique salutory effects of the nitrates in subjects with left ventricular dysfunction or congestive heart failure make these drugs particularly attractive for patients with abnormal systolic function and intermittent myocardial ischemia. Finally, the emergent role of intravenous nitroglycerin in acute myocardial infarction offers new prospects that nitrate therapy may prove to be beneficial in acute myocardial infarction as well as postmyocardial infarction for the reduction of left ventricular remodeling.     

Use of nitrates in ischemic heart disease.

The organic nitrates have remarkably diverse actions that are or should be beneficial in patients with ischemic heart disease. These drugs are effective in all the important ischemic syndromes. Preliminary data in patients with acute infarction suggest that the drugs may be truly cardioprotective, resulting in improved mortality. This review has not discussed the role of nitrates in congestive heart failure or LV dysfunction, a subject of great importance. The nitrates are useful adjunctive agents in these syndromes, and the two VeHfT trials support the concept that long-term nitrate administration, in conjunction with hydralazine, may favorably alter the natural history of heart failure. This cardioprotective effect is similar to that suggested for the post-MI patient. The data are not strong enough for definitive conclusions at this time. The clinical benefits of nitrates in decreasing subjective (angina) and objective indices of ischemia in stable and unstable angina, as well as limited data in asymptomatic myocardial ischemia, are unequivocal and are as favorable as those for beta blockers or calcium antagonists. Tolerance is an important problem that unfavorably influences the potential benefits of nitrate therapy. I believe that this problem can be avoided with well-designed dosing regimens. Current research into endothelial biology in health and disease has further supported a physiologic role for the organic nitrates in patients with ischemic heart disease. The nitrate-platelet story, while controversial, is promising and offers another positive rationale for nitrate administration. The concept of nitrates replenishing disordered EDRF release or action is an exciting one. Physicians should feel fortunate to have such a remarkable group of drugs available for their patients.     

Nitrates and angina pectoris

This review discusses the mechanisms of action of the organic nitrates, nitrate tolerance, and the effects of nitrates in patients with stable angina pectoris. The nitrates are prodrugs that enter the vascular smooth muscle, where they are denitrated to form the active agent nitric oxide (NO). NO activates guanylate cyclase, which results in cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) production and vasodilation as a result of reuptake of calcium by the sarcoplasmic reticulum. NO is identical to endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF), which induces vasodilation, inhibits platelet aggregation, reduces endothelium adhesion, and has anticoagulant and fibrinolytic effects. Thus, the nitrates may be more than vasodilators and, in addition to reducing ischemia, may affect the process of atherosclerosis. The vascular effects of nitrates are attenuated during sustained therapy. Although the basis for the phenomenon of nitrate tolerance is not completely understood, sulfhydryl depletion as well as neurohormonal activation and increased plasma volume may be involved. The administration of N-acetylcysteine, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, or diuretics do not consistently prevent nitrate tolerance. At present, intermittent nitrate therapy is the only way to avoid nitrate tolerance. The intermittent administration of nitrates, however, cannot provide continuous therapeutic benefits, and thus monotherapy with nitrates is not suitable for many patients with stable angina pectoris.     

The Role of Nitric Oxide in Erectile Dysfunction: Implications for Medical Therapy

Erectile dysfunction is a common, multifactorial disorder that is associated with aging and a range of organic and psychogenic conditions, including hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and depression. Penile erection is a complex process involving psychogenic and hormonal input, and a neurovascular nonadrenergic, noncholinergic mechanism. Nitric oxide (NO) is believed to be the main vasoactive nonadrenergic, noncholinergic neurotransmitter and chemical mediator of penile erection. Released by nerve and endothelial cells in the corpora cavernosa of the penis, NO activates soluble guanylyl cyclase, which increases 3',5'-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) levels. Acting as a second messenger molecule, cGMP regulates the activity of calcium channels as well as intracellular contractile proteins that affect the relaxation of corpus cavernosum smooth muscle. Impaired NO bioactivity is a major pathogenic mechanism of erectile dysfunction. Treatment of erectile dysfunction often requires combinations of psychogenic and medical therapies, many of which have been only moderately successful in the past. The advent of oral phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors, however, has greatly enhanced erectile dysfunction treatment; patients have demonstrated high tolerability and success rates for improved erectile function. The efficacy of the PDE-5 inhibitors also serves to illustrate the importance of the NO-cGMP pathway in erectile function since these agents counteract the degradation of NO-generated cGMP. Because not all patients respond to PDE-5 inhibitors, additional therapies are being investigated, such as soluble guanylyl cyclase activators and NO donors, which act on NO-independent and NO-dependent pathways, respectively.     

Mechanisms of nitrate tolerance

Summary There is now little dispute that clinical tolerance of organic nitrates occurs, particularly when these drugs are used by themselves to treat patients with stable angina pectoris and congestive heart failure. Classical hypotheses of nitrate tolerance suggest the phenomenon to result from vascular depletion of critical sulfhydryl groups, which are necessary to bring about vasorelaxation from nitrates. While this mechanism of nitrate tolerance probably operates when isolated blood vessels are exposed to high concentrations of nitrate in vitro, there is little evidence to suggest that it contributes to clinical nitrate tolerance. Instead, emerging data suggest that nitrates can cause significant shifts in fluid distribution and secretion of neurohormonal factors that can modulate their vasorelaxant effects. use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics in conjunction with nitrates may alleviate the development of tolerance, but the experience has not been universally favorable. Other receptor-effector systems that affect cardiovascular function, such as the adrenergic system, may also be affected by nitrate tolerance. The mechanisms of nitrate tolerance are therefore likely to be multifactorial, involving vascular biochemical changes, physiologic compensation, and possibly receptor regulation.     

Therapeutic potential of nitric oxide donors in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis.

Well-known risk factors for atherosclerosis include hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. These conditions are associated with endothelial dysfunction, which itself is associated with reduced endothelial generation of nitric oxide (NO). This is an overview of the implications of NO generation in atherosclerosis and of the potential therapeutic benefit of drugs which donate NO, such as organic nitrates, nicorandil, and sydnonimines, or those which increase the availability of endogenous NO, such as statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, L-arginine, and tetrahydrobiopterin.     

Biochemical mechanism of organic nitrate action.

Increasing evidence suggests that organic nitrate action derives from their metabolic conversion to nitric oxide (NO) in the vascular smooth muscle cell. The primary catalytic activity of this process appears to reside at the cellular plasma membrane. There is no concrete evidence to indicate that NO formation is preceded by the production of inorganic nitrite ion or that the NO produced needs to form S-nitrosothiols before it can activate guanylate cyclase to produce cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cGMP). Although sulfhydryl donors can partially reverse nitroglycerin-induced tolerance in patients, this phenomenon (by itself) is not sufficient to implicate intracellular sulfhydryl depletion as an operating mechanism of clinical nitrate tolerance. This is because sulfhydryl donors can react with nitroglycerin extracellularly to form S-nitrosothiols, and nonsulfhydryl compounds, such as enalapril and hydralazine, can prevent the development of in vivo nitrate tolerance. In addition to the cellular biochemical reactions, organic nitrates also produce systemic biochemical effects through altering neurohormonal status. These systemic effects may contribute significantly to the development of nitrate tolerance in therapeutic situations.     

Aspects of Nitric Oxide in Health and Disease: A Focus on Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease

Nitric oxide (nitrogen monoxide) (NO) plays an important role in a wide range of physiologic processes. A major mediator of endothelial function, NO regulates vasodilatory and antithrombotic actions in the vasculature and plays a role in reproductive functions, bronchodilation, bone formation, memory, insulin sensitivity, and gastrointestinal relaxation. NO is formed from NO synthase. Impaired NO bioactivity is strongly associated with endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease, but is also implicated in a broad range of other disorders, including pulmonary hypertension, insulin resistance, erectile dysfunction, and preeclampsia. Numerous therapies designed to target NO are being investigated and developed, including NO donors and stimulants. The recent African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT) showed that the NO donor isosorbide dinitrate, combined with the vasodilator hydralazine, significantly reduced morbidity and mortality in black patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure. Antihypertensive drugs, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and third-generation β-blockers, are NO stimulants that have demonstrated significant improvement of endothelial function and NO bioactivity. Other cardiovascular therapies that may improve NO bioactivity include statins, L-arginine, and hydralazine approaches such as exercise and dietary changes.     

Enhanced anti-inflammatory effects of a nitric oxide-releasing derivative of mesalamine in rats.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nitric oxide (NO)-releasing derivatives of cyclooxygenase inhibitors exhibit enhanced anti-inflammatory activity and greatly reduced gastrointestinal toxicity. We evaluated whether a similar derivatization of mesalamine (5-aminosalicylic acid) would improve its anti-inflammatory activity. METHODS: Effects of an NO-releasing derivative of mesalamine (NCX-456; NO-mesalamine) were compared with those of mesalamine itself and 2 other NO donors in a rat model of colitis. These drugs were compared for their ability to inhibit leukocyte adherence to the vascular endothelium in vivo, interleukin (IL)-1beta and interferon (IFN)-gamma release in vitro (splenocytes and colon), and messenger RNA expression in the inflamed colon. RESULTS: NO-mesalamine was significantly more effective than mesalamine in reducing the severity of colitis (damage and granulocyte infiltration). Unlike mesalamine, NO-mesalamine significantly suppressed leukocyte adherence to the vascular endothelium in vivo. NO-mesalamine inhibited IL-1beta and IFN-gamma release and caspase 1 activity in splenocytes; such effects were not found in the inflamed colon. CONCLUSIONS: These studies show that an NO-releasing derivative of mesalamine has significantly enhanced anti-inflammatory activity, including improved efficacy in a rat model of colitis. The improved efficacy of this derivative is most likely caused by its enhanced ability to suppress leukocyte infiltration and possibly to scavenge peroxynitrite.     

Osteoarthritis therapy--are there still unmet needs?

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors are commonly used to control pain and inflammation in osteoarthritis. However, these agents have been associated with gastrointestinal, renal and cardiovascular adverse effects. Together, these complications indicate a clear unmet need in the safety of current treatment options for the management of osteoarthritis. NSAIDs are known to have adverse gastrointestinal effects, and more recently it has been suggested that some selective COX-2 inhibitors are also associated with serious gastrointestinal complications. Selective COX-2 inhibitors have a similar capacity to NSAIDs to delay ulcer healing, and may not significantly decrease the incidences of perforation, ulceration and bleeding (the most clinically relevant gastrointestinal endpoints) compared with NSAIDs. These effects may be due to overlapping roles of COX-1 and COX-2 in physiological and pathophysiological processes. Furthermore, as COX-2 is integrally involved in renal homeostasis, selective COX-2 inhibitors are associated with negative effects on kidney function similar to those seen with NSAIDs. Electrolyte disturbances, oedema and hypertension have been correlated with the use of both drug classes. Additionally, selective COX-2 inhibitors have the potential to increase cardiovascular events, although further research is required to clearly determine such a risk. With the current unmet needs in the treatment of osteoarthritis, the opportunity exists for the development of new therapies. Novel agents include the COX-inhibiting nitric oxide donors and the lipoxygenase (LOX)/COX inhibitor licofelone. Initial results suggest that these therapies may have tolerability advantages over the NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors.     

HDAC2 blockade by nitric oxide and histone deacetylase inhibitors reveals a common target in Duchenne muscular dystrophy treatment

The overlapping histological and biochemical features underlying the beneficial effect of deacetylase inhibitors and NO donors in dystrophic muscles suggest an unanticipated molecular link among dystrophin, NO signaling, and the histone deacetylases (HDACs). Higher global deacetylase activity and selective increased expression of the class I histone deacetylase HDAC2 were detected in muscles of dystrophin-deficient MDX mice. In vitro and in vivo siRNA-mediated down-regulation of HDAC2 in dystrophic muscles was sufficient to replicate the morphological and functional benefits observed with deacetylase inhibitors and NO donors. We found that restoration of NO signaling in vivo, by adenoviral-mediated expression of a constitutively active endothelial NOS mutant in MDX muscles, and in vitro, by exposing MDX-derived satellite cells to NO donors, resulted in HDAC2 blockade by cysteine S-nitrosylation. These data reveal a special contribution of HDAC2 in the pathogenesis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and indicate that HDAC2 inhibition by NO-dependent S-nitrosylation is important for the therapeutic response to NO donors in MDX mice. They also define a common target for independent pharmacological interventions in the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.     

乙醛脱氢酶2与硝酸酯耐药关系的研究进展

从19世纪后期开始,硝酸酯类药物就应用于稳定型心绞痛、急性心肌梗死及慢性充血性心力衰竭的临床治疗。然而,长期应用时机体血管很快对其产生耐药,影响了该类药物的血流动力学和抗缺血效果。其耐药机制极为复杂,尚不十分清楚。近来研究表明,线粒体内活性氧簇的产生和继发乙醛脱氢酶2的氧化失活,在硝酸酯耐药和交叉耐药产生过程中起重要作用。     

Nitrate tolerance, rebound, and their clinical relevance in stable angina pectoris, unstable angina, and heart failure

Summary Vascular tolerance develops rapidly in isolated vascular strips exposed to millimolar concentrations of nitroglycerin. Several mechanisms, including depletion of sulfhydryl groups, reduced biotransformation of nitrates to NO or nitrosothiols, oxygen free radical injury, and downregulation of a membrane-bound enzyme or a nitrate receptor, have been proposed, but the exact mechanism responsible for in-vitro tolerance remains unknown. In-vivo tolerance of the beneficial effects of nitrates on hemodynamics, myocardial ischemia, and exercise performance develops rapidly. It has been suggested, but remains to be proven, that development of venous tolerance and not arterial tolerance is responsible for the attenuation of nitrate effects during long-term nitrate therapy. Several mechanisms, including neurohormonal activation, depletion of sulfhydryl groups, and the shift of fluid from the extravascular to intravascular compartment have been implicated. However, the use of agents to counteract these mechanisms (ACE inhibitors, sulfhydryl donors, diuretics) has produced conflicting results. Thus, at present the mechanism responsible for in vivo tolerance to nitrates remains unknown. Both in vitro and in vivo vascular tolerance to nitrates can be prevented or minimized by providing nitrate-free or low-nitrate intervals. However, during nitrate-free periods, rebound phenomena (rest angina in patients with ischemic heart disease or a deterioration in exercise performance prior to the renewal of the morning dose in patients with stable angina) remain a clinicla concer. When treating patients with stable angina pectoris, it must be recognized that none of the nitrate preparations or formulations can provide round-the-clock antianginal or antiischemic prophylaxis. In these patients, beneficial antianginal and anti-ischemic effects of nitrates for 10–14 hours during the day-time can be maintained by using formulations and dosing regimens that avoid or minimize the development of tolerance (standard formulation of isosorbide-5-mononitrate, 20 mg in the morning and 7 hours later; slow-release formulation of isosorbide-5-mononitrate, 120–240 mg once a day; or nitroglycerin patch delivering 0.6 nitroglycerin per hour for 10–12 hours each day). Only the patch on an off treatment is associated with nitrate rebound. Although intermittent nitrate therapy is not associated with the development of tolerance, this strategy cannot be recommended for treating unstable angina because rebound angina during nitrate-free periods complicates clinical decision making. In the acute phase of unstable angina, continuous treatment with intravenous nitroglycerin is recommended because it permits rapid up- or down-titration. Tolerance towards antianginal and antiischemic effects does develop in a substantial number of patients within 24 hours, but this can be overridden by dose escalation and restoration of the therapeutic effectiveness of nitroglycerin. Tolerance towards the beneficial effects of nitrates on hemodynamics and on exercise performance also develops rapidly during continuous or long-term nitrate therapy, and for these reasons nitrates are not used as first-line therapy to treat chronic heart failure. In combination with hydralazine, high-dose isosorbide dinitrate (30–40 mg four times a day) improves survival, but this combination therapy is inferior to ACE inhibitors.     

Nitrates versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for congestive heart failure

The efficacy of nitrates versus that of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in heart failure may be evaluated based on 3 treatment aims: hemodynamic improvement, symptom relief, and survival benefit. Nitrates used in conjunction with hydralazine produce a relatively large increase in stroke volume and a prominent reduction of left ventricular filling pressure, whereas ACE inhibitors produce a comparatively modest increase in stroke volume with a prominent reduction in filling pressure. The effect of these drugs on arterial compliance has been evaluated using a modified Windkessel model of the circulation to define their mechanism of action. Nitrates appear to affect the large arteries and arterial bed as well as the venous circulation. Intermediate-term response to therapy is often evaluated by changes in exercise tolerance. A review of multicenter trials reveals that, although both ACE inhibitors and hydralazine/nitrate have favorable hemodynamic actions, the effect of hydralazine/nitrate on exercise capacity appears to be slightly better. ACE inhibitors and nitrates both may reduce dysfunctional myocardial remodeling, as evaluated in a canine model of chronic left ventricular dysfunction. The increase in the ejection fraction by these drugs and the decrease of plasma norepinephrine levels by ACE inhibitors may contribute to improved long-term survival. It appears, therefore, that the long-term benefits of nitrates and ACE inhibitors in heart failure probably relate to their ability both to affect cardiac remodeling and to relax vascular smooth muscle.     

Organic nitrates: New formulations and their clinical advantages

The organic nitrates have been used for more than a century in the management of patients with myocardial ischemia. The most commonly used agents at this time include nitroglycerin, isosorbide dinitrate, and isosorbide-5-mononitrate. These agents all exert their therapeutic effects through biodegradation to nitric oxide, which stimulates guanylate cyclase in vascular smooth muscle cells with the production of cyclic guanosine monophosphate. The latter induces vasodilation by reducing the availability of ionized calcium to the contractile proteins. Tolerance to the organic nitrates occurs when the agents are administered in an attempt to provide therapeutic effects throughout 24 hours each day. There are probably several mechanisms responsible for nitrate tolerance, but there is no evidence at this time that concurrent medications will modify the development of tolerance. The only available method at this time is to give these agents intermittently to provide a period of washout. In so doing, it is possible to provide therapeutic nitrate effects for approximately 12 hours throughout each 24-hour period.     

Vasodilator therapy: interaction of nitrates with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

Nitrates and other nitrosovasodilators are locally acting agents. Their efficacy is reported to depend upon the availability of sulfhydryl groups in vascular smooth muscle. Long term nitrosovasodilator therapy has limited effectiveness, and development of nitrate tolerance has been recognized to be due to exhaustion of the tissue sulfhydryl pool, in addition to vasodilation-induced reflex activation of the neurohumoral system. Under both experimental and clinical conditions it has been demonstrated that N-acetylcysteine and other exogenously introduced sulfhydryl donors potentiate hemodynamic responses to nitrates and reverse nitrate tolerance. The newer group of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor drugs has been reported to be effective in reducing afterload and preload in a variety of experimental and clinical trials. Captopril, the first developed ACE inhibitor, and its analogs contain sulfhydryl groups. Although the sulfhydryl group of captopril is not thought to be responsible for its vasodilator action, it can act as a sulfhydryl donor to promote nitrate effectiveness and prevent development of tolerance. Limited experimental and clinical trials on combined therapy with nitrates and captopril have produced promising results. An ingenious prototype compound, S-nitrosocaptopril, has recently been synthesized. This is an exciting new development in vasodilator therapy, but clinical application must await full experimental characterization of this and other identical compounds.     

Pulse pressure, arterial stiffness, and drug treatment of hypertension

Epidemiological studies in the past decade have stressed the importance of pulse pressure as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We briefly review the epidemiological evidence and discuss in more detail the pathophysiological basis for this observation and the therapeutic consequences. We focus on the vascular determinants of increased pulse pressure. Both longitudinal and cross-sectional components of the vascular system contribute to the shape of the arterial pressure wave and, thereby, to pulse pressure. The primary longitudinal component is the architecture of the arterial tree, which determines the major reflection sites for the pressure wave. The cross-sectional architecture of the vascular system consists of a geometric (diameter) and a structural (composition vessel wall) component. Both diameter and composition of the vessel wall vary greatly when going from central to more peripheral arteries. We review the implications for the functional properties of various arterial segments. Finally, we discuss the therapeutic consequences of targeting pulse pressure rather than mean blood pressure with various drug classes. Among the antihypertensive agents, nitrates, NO donors, and drugs that interfere with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system may offer useful tools to lower pulse pressure, in addition to mean blood pressure. Future developments may include non-antihypertensive agents that target collagen or other components of the arterial wall matrix. However, large-scale clinical trials will have to confirm the therapeutic value of these agents in the treatment of increased pulse pressure and arterial stiffness.     

Therapie mit NO-Donatoren

Nitric acid esters such as glyceryl trinitrate were introduced into therapy more than a century ago and are still widely used for the treatment of myocardial ischemia and its main symptom angina pectoris. The basic mechanisms responsible for the vasodilatory and anti-ischemic action of organic nitrates involve bioactivation of, and nitric oxide (NO) release from, these compounds which have therefore been termed NO donors. The organic nitrate pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) is known to possess antioxidant properties that are thought to be the underlying cause for its specific pharmacological profile. In contrast to other long-acting nitrates, PETN induces tolerance- free vasodilation in humans and was reported to prevent endothelial dysfunction as well as atherogenesis in cholesterol- fed rabbits. However, the exact nature of the vasoprotective signaling pathways triggered by PETN has remained obscure. The present study demonstrates that the active PETN metabolite PETriN stimulates protein expression of the antioxidant defense protein heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1; Figures 1 and 2). Additionally, PETriN enhanced the enzymatic activity of HO-1 measured as formation of the HO-1 metabolites bilirubin (Figure 3) and carbon monoxide (Figure 4) in lysates from endothelial cells. HO-1 induction subsequently led to a marked increase in protein expression of a second antioxidant protein, ferritin, via the HO-1-dependent release of free iron from endogenous heme sources (Figures 1 and 5). Pretreatment of endothelial cells with PETriN was followed by increased cellular resistance to oxidant injury mediated by hydrogen peroxide (Figure 6). Endothelial protection by PETriN was mimicked by exogenous bilirubin which led to an almost complete reversal of hydrogen peroxide-induced toxicity (Figure 8). Increased HO-1 and ferritin expression as well as endothelial protection occurred at micromolar concentrations of PETriN which are well within the range of plasma or tissue levels that can be expected during oral therapy. The capacity to protect the endothelium in vitro may translate into and explain the previously observed antiatherogenic actions of PETN in vivo. In this study, another long-acting nitrate, isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN), did not protect endothelial cells from oxidant damage (Figure 6). The absence of significant cytoprotection in the presence of ISDN was paralleled by a lack of HO-1 and ferritin stimulatory capacity (Figures 2 and 5). ISDN had no significant effect on carbon monoxide release or bilirubin formation (Figures 3 and 4). These observations are in agreement with results demonstrating small or nondetectable amounts of NO released from ISDN and its active metabolite isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) measured as cyclic GMP formation in RFL-6 reporter cells (Figure 7). Interestingly and in contrast to PETN, isosorbide nitrates are known to induce tolerance to their cardiovascular effects, presumably via oxidant stress. Moreover, in earlier investigations aimed at assessing the antiatherogenic potential of nitrates, PETN but not isosorbide nitrates prevented plaque formation and endothelial dysfunction in animal models of atherosclerosis. Thus, the ability to activate HO-1 induction and associated antioxidant pathways apparently distinguishes PETN from other long-acting nitrates and may explain their different patterns of action in vivo (Figure 9).     

Therapeutic effects of inorganic nitrate and nitrite in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases

Nitric oxide (NO) is generated endogenously by NO synthases to regulate a number of physiological processes including cardiovascular and metabolic functions. A decrease in the production and bioavailability of NO is a hallmark of many major chronic diseases including hypertension, ischaemia–reperfusion injury, atherosclerosis and diabetes. This NO deficiency is mainly caused by dysfunctional NO synthases and increased scavenging of NO by the formation of reactive oxygen species. Inorganic nitrate and nitrite are emerging as substrates for in vivo NO synthase‐independent formation of NO bioactivity. These anions are oxidation products of endogenous NO generation and are also present in the diet, with green leafy vegetables having a high nitrate content. The effects of nitrate and nitrite are diverse and include vasodilatation, improved endothelial function, enhanced mitochondrial efficiency and reduced generation of reactive oxygen species. Administration of nitrate or nitrite in animal models of cardiovascular disease shows promising results, and clinical trials are currently ongoing to investigate the therapeutic potential of nitrate and nitrite in hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, peripheral artery disease and myocardial infarction. In addition, the nutritional aspects of the nitrate–nitrite–NO pathway are interesting as diets suggested to protect against cardiovascular disease, such as the Mediterranean diet, are especially high in nitrate. Here, we discuss the potential therapeutic opportunities for nitrate and nitrite in prevention and treatment of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases.     

Unresolved issues in the role of cyclooxygenase-2 in normal physiologic processes and disease

Originally suggested to function mainly in inflammatory situations, recent data have implied important roles for the cyclooxygenase-2 isoenzyme in reproductive biologic processes, renal and neurologic function, and the antithrombotic activities of endothelial cells. As cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitors have recently become available as analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs, a comprehensive view of this rapidly evolving field is necessary to anticipate both the potential therapeutic benefits and toxic effects associated with these agents.