Effect of Post-Transplant Cardiac Angiographic Procedures on Post-Transplant Renal Function

BackgroundCardiac interventions often are performed before and after renal transplant for coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether post-transplant cardiac coronary procedures affect post-transplant renal function.MethodWe retrospectively included renal transplant recipients who underwent renal transplant procedures at Baskent University between April 28, 1997 and January 20, 2020. We analyzed the effect of cardiac catheterization in renal transplant recipients between 6 and 12 months post-transplant with post-transplant renal function assessed by glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We compared the effect of the type of coronary intervention on GFR change in group 1, whereby group 1 was divided into 2 subgroups (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] and stenting). Group 1 included patients who underwent cardiac intervention, whereas group 2 included those who had not undergone cardiac intervention.ResultsIn all, 108 patients underwent coronary angiography; 45 (41.7%) had normal coronaries or minimal coronary artery disease (CAD); 37 (34.3%) underwent stent implantation; 26 (24.1%) underwent CABG. The mean post- transplantation GFR of all patients after cardiac catheterization was 84.26+25.91 (mL/min/1.73 m²). The final, after 12 months mean GFR of all patients was 69.55+27.05. The final GFR was significantly lower than the initial post-renal GFR value in patients who underwent cardiac intervention but not in non-intervened patients.ConclusionInvasive cardiac revascularization procedures showed a negative effect on post-transplant renal function in renal transplant recipients. All renal transplant recipients who underwent cardiac intervention survived the intervention, and there was no mortality. The reason for this outcome was assumed to be because of the short follow-up period.     

Coronary Artery Bypass With Multiarterial Grafting vs Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BackgroundData comparing patients who undergo multiarterial grafting during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with multivessel coronary disease are scarce. This study addresses the relevance of using multiple arterial conduits vs PCI for appropriate patients.MethodsThis retrospective study included all patients with coronary artery disease who underwent CABG with multiple arterial conduits or PCI. Propensity score matching was performed for baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimates, cumulative incidence, and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) curves were performed.ResultsThe total patient population consisted of 3648 patients from 2011 to 2018 divided into 902 CABG patients and 2746 PCI patients. Patients were propensity matched (PCI, n = 838; CABG, n = 838). In the CABG cohort the left internal mammary artery was used in 837 patients (99.9%), the right internal mammary artery in 770 patients (92%), and radial arteries in 108 patients (12.9%). Patients in the PCI cohort had significantly higher 30-day mortality (24 [2.9%] vs 7 [0.8%], P < .01). Survival over follow-up (median, 4.9 years; range, 3.3-6.8) was better for the CABG cohort (730 [87.1%] vs 625 [74.6%], P < .01). Patients in the CABG cohort had greater freedom from MACCE (607 [72.4%] vs 339 [40.5%], P < .01). Cox multivariable regression showed that patients who underwent CABG had a significantly reduced risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.61; P < .01) and of MACCE (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.38; P < .01).ConclusionsPatients with coronary artery disease who undergo CABG with multiple arterial conduits have significantly fewer major adverse events, improved survival, and reduced hospital readmissions.     

Differences Among Clinical Trials and Registries on Surgical and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

BackgroundA need exists for systematic evaluation of the differences in baseline characteristics and early outcomes between patients enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical practice for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).MethodsSystematic searches were conducted to identify RCTs comparing CABG vs PCI and CABG or PCI registries. Sixteen predefined baseline characteristics and 30-day mortality were extracted from the included studies. Pooled proportion and mean with 95% CI were calculated for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively, by using the random effects model.ResultsFourteen RCTs and 10 registries including more than 2 million patients were included. Registry patients who underwent CABG had a higher prevalence of hypertension, smoking, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and prior myocardial infarction, but a lower prevalence of single-vessel disease when compared with CABG-treated patients included in RCTs. Regarding PCI, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, left main coronary artery disease, triple-vessel coronary disease, and NYHA functional class <IV were significantly more prevalent among patients in RCTs, whereas age, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and smoking were more represented among PCI registry patients. Thirty-day mortality was higher in registries for both PCI-treated and CABG-treated patients.ConclusionsThere were significant differences in baseline characteristics and 30-day mortality between patients enrolled in RCTs comparing CABG vs PCI and CABG and PCI registries. However, results were mixed, and the discrepancy was less than seen in other fields.     

Debate over patient-centered care: Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting?

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have developed as effective therapies to treat coronary artery disease. Initial CABG is associated with lower mortality than initial medical management, especially among high- and intermediate-risk patients with coronary artery disease. However, PCI is currently the most frequent initial treatment delivered by interventional cardiologists to treat multivessel coronary artery disease, despite substantial evidence from meta-analyses of randomized trials and registry data favoring CABG. Recent advancements in PCI did not result in detectable improvements in death or myocardial infarction compared with medical therapy, although significant reductions in target lesions or vessel revascularization were identified after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES) rather than a baremetal stent. The SYNTAX trial compared patients with left main and/or three-vessel coronary artery disease treated with DES or CABG. The results of the trial demonstrated the 1-year inferiority of PCI compared with CABG with respect to major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Nevertheless, patients with coronary artery disease continue to receive more recommendations for PCI and fewer for CABG than are indicated in the guidelines. A multidisciplinary team approach should be the standard of care when recommending interventions for treating complex coronary artery disease among patients for whom CABG is superior in terms of survival and freedom from reintervention.     

Differential survival after coronary revascularization procedures among patients with renal insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, and other cardiac events are the major cause of mortality among patients with renal insufficiency. Previous studies of interventions for coronary artery disease among patients with renal insufficiency have not controlled for potentially confounding factors such as coronary artery disease severity and left ventricular function. This study investigates the comparative survival for patients with renal insufficiency and coronary artery disease following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery as compared with percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI), while controlling for confounding factors. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing CABG surgery or PCI discharged between 1993 and 1995 uses the New York Department of Health databases and Cox proportional hazards analyses to estimate the mortality risk associated with CABG as compared with PCI for patients with renal insufficiency. Renal function was categorized as creatinine <2.5 mg/dL (N = 58,329), creatinine > or =2.5 mg/dL (N = 840), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis (N = 407). RESULTS: Patients with either ESRD or serum creatinine > or =2.5 mg/dL had more severe coronary artery disease and a greater frequency of comorbid conditions as compared with patients with creatinine <2.5 mg/dL. Creatinine > or =2.5 mg/dL and ESRD were both associated with an increased mortality risk among all distributions of coronary artery disease anatomy. Among patients with ESRD, the risk ratio (RR) of mortality for patients undergoing CABG compared with PCI was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.67, P = 0.0006). Among patients with creatinine > or =2.5 mg/dL, CABG surgery did not convey a survival benefit over PCI (RR, 0.86, 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.33, P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a survival benefit among patients with ESRD undergoing CABG surgery as compared with PCI, while controlling for severity of coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, and other comorbid conditions. These results suggest that management decisions among patients with coronary artery disease should be made in the context of not only location and severity of coronary artery lesions, but also on the presence and severity of renal dysfunction.     

Die Bedeutung der SYNTAX-Studie für die moderne Koronarchirurgie

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is still considered to be the standard of care for patients with a prognostically relevant pattern of coronary artery disease. New stent designs, including drug-eluting stents (DES) and improvements in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technologies during recent years, challenge CABG in the treatment of coronary three-vessel disease and/or left main stem stenosis. To date, randomized trials have demonstrated significantly higher repeat revascularization rates in PCI patients but comparable results regarding procedural and mid-term survival as well as adverse events like myocardial infarction. In contrast, real world registry data demonstrated a survival benefit of CABG over PCI as the primary treatment option. Recently, 2-year results of the largest comparative randomized trial to date, the SYNTAX trial, were made available. These data demonstrated the superiority of CABG over PCI regarding the combined endpoint of death and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, including repeat revascularization. There were comparable results in patients with less complex coronary artery disease between PCI and CABG, while patients with more complex coronary pathologies had significantly better results after surgical intervention. These results have led to controversies in all major medical societies and have resulted in intensive and ongoing guideline discussions.     

Chronic kidney disease,mortality, and treatment strategies among patients with clinically significant coronary artery disease

Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study describes associations between CKD, cardiac revascularization strategies, and mortality among patients with CKD and cardiovascular disease. All patients undergoing cardiac catheterization at Duke University Medical Center (1995 to 2000) with documented stenosis > or =75% of at least one coronary artery and available creatinine data were included. CKD was staged using creatinine clearance (CrCl) derived from the Cockcroft-Gault formula (normal, > or = 90 ml/min; mild, 60 to 89 ml/min; moderate, 30 to 59 ml/min; severe, 15 to 29 ml/min). Cox proportional-hazard regression estimated the relationship between clinical variables, including CrCl and percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), medical management, and patient survival. There were 4584 patients included, and 24% had CrCl <60 ml/min. Each 10-ml/min decrement in CrCl was associated with an increase in mortality (hazard ratio, 1.14; P < 0.0001). CABG was associated with a survival benefit among patients with both normal renal function and patients with CKD compared with medical management. In patients with normal renal function, CABG was not associated with survival benefit over PCI. However, in patients with CKD, CABG was associated with improved survival. PCI was associated with a survival benefit compared with medical management among patients with normal, mildly, and moderately impaired renal function. Among patients with severe CKD, PCI was not associated with improved survival. CABG is associated with greater mortality reduction than PCI in severe CKD.     

Surgical Myocardial Revascularization versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Eluting Stents in Octogenarian Patients

Objective: Our goal was to compare the clinical outcomes of octogenarian (or older) patients who are referred for either surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of all patients 80 years of age who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with an internal mammary artery or had undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a sirolimus-eluting stent to the left anterior descending artery in our center between May 2002 and December 2006.Results: Of the 301 patients, 120 underwent a PCI, and 181 underwent CABG. Surgical patients had higher rates of left main disease, triple-vessel disease, peripheral vascular disease, emergent procedures, and previous myocardial infarctions (39.7% versus 3.3% [P = .001], 76.1% versus 28.3% [P = .0001], 19.6% versus 7.5% [P = .004], 15.8% versus 2.5% [P = .0001], and 35.9% versus 25% [P = .04], respectively). CABG patients had a higher early mortality rate (9.9% versus 2.5%, P = .01). There were no differences in 1- and 4-year actuarial survival rates, with rates of 90% and 68%, respectively, for the PCI group and 85% and 71% for the CABG group (P = .85). The rates of actuarial freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 1 and 4 years were 83% and 75%, respectively, for the PCI group, and 86% and 78% for the CABG group (P = .33). The respective rates of freedom from reintervention were 87% and 83% for the PCI group, versus 99% and 97% for the CABG group (P < .001). The 4-year rate of freedom from recurring angina was 58% for the PCI group, versus 88% for CABG patients (P < .001). Revascularization strategy was not a predictor of adverse outcome in a multivariable analysis.Conclusion: Octogenarian CABG patients were sicker and experienced a higher rate of early mortality. The 2 strategies had similar rates of late mortality and MACEs, with fewer reinterventions and recurring angina occurring following surgery.     

Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Artery Intervention in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis: Does a Drug‐Eluting Stent Have an Impact on Clinical Outcome?

Abstract   Coronary revascularization methods continue to be refined, and the emergence of the drug-eluting stent (DES) has especially changed clinical practice related to ischemic heart disease. For chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients, however, the impact of DES on clinical outcome is yet to be determined. Forty-six consecutive chronic HD patients who underwent myocardial revascularization in our institute were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-eight patients underwent coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and 18 patients underwent percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI). Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. In the CABG group, bilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) bypass grafting was performed in 27 patients and off-pump CABG was performed in 20 patients. In the PCI group, a DES was used in 12 patients. The number of coronary vessels treated per patient was higher in the CABG group (CABG: 4.25 ± 1.32 vs. PCI: 1.44 ± 0.78; p < 0.001). Two-year survival rates were similar between the two groups (CABG: 94.1% vs. PCI: 73.9%; p = 0.41), but major adverse cardiac event-free survival (CABG: 85.9% vs. PCI: 37.1%; p = 0.001) and angina-free survival (CABG: 84.9% vs. PCI: 28.9%; p < 0.001) rates were significantly higher in the CABG group. The one-year patency rate for the CABG grafts was 93.3% (left ITA: 100%, right ITA: 84.6%, sapenous vein: 90.9%, gastro-epiploic artery: 100%), and six-month restenosis rate for PCI was 57.1% (balloon angio-plasty: 75%, bare metal stent 40%, DES: 58.3%). Even in the era of DES, clinical results favored CABG. The difference in clinical results is due to the sustainability of successful revascularization.     

Current status and outcomes of coronary revascularization 1999 to 2002: 148,396 surgical and percutaneous procedures

BACKGROUND: Current practice, trends, and early outcomes in patients undergoing surgical and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are changing and subject to speculation. METHODS: 148,396 consecutive patients in 69 HCA, Inc hospitals who underwent either PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were tracked in the HCA Casemix Database from 1999 through the first quarter of 2002. Comorbid conditions, procedures, complications, and outcome variables were defined through International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding. Odds ratios (OR) for death and other procedure-related complications were estimated using logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, and 31 other patient clinical and procedural characteristics. RESULTS: Now 65.4% of all coronary revascularization is by PCI with a 6.8% annual rate of increase whereas CABG volume is declining by 1.9% per year. However the majority of these changes occurred between 1999 and 2000 with only small changes in the last 3 years. Coronary artery bypass grafting is still utilized primarily for multivessel disease (3.38 bypasses per patient) whereas PCI is predominately (83%) still limited to single-vessel intervention. Unadjusted mortality rates over the full 13-quarter period were 1.25% for PCI and 2.63% for CABG (p < 0.001), with PCI rates remaining constant and CABG mortality declining. Twenty-three percent of CABG is performed off pump with a lower mortality than conventional on-pump CABG (2.37% versus 2.69%, p < 0.001). Percutaneous coronary intervention patients have lower mortality (OR 0.51), and fewer acute renal failure (OR 0.39), neurologic (OR 0.12), and cardiac (OR 0.16) complications than CABG patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions for coronary artery disease continue to rise primarily due to an increase in PCI. The volume of PCI continues to increase relative to CABG. Although adverse outcomes are higher after CABG, the proportion of multivessel disease treated is greater. The difference in adverse outcomes between CABG and PCI remains small and continues to decline.     

Multivessel coronary revascularization and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients

Coronary artery disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the kidney transplant population. We compared the long‐term outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for multivessel coronary disease in a contemporary cohort of US kidney transplant recipients. From the U.S. Renal Data System, we identified all adult kidney transplant patients with ≥6 months of Medicare A+B undergoing first recorded multivessel coronary revascularization from 1997 to 2009. The associations of CABG versus PCI with death and the composite of death or myocardial infarction (MI) were compared using proportional hazards regression. Of the 2272 patients included in the study, 1594 underwent CABG and 678 underwent PCI. The estimated 5‐year survival rate was 55% [95% confidence interval (CI) 53% to 57%] following coronary revascularization, with no significant association between revascularization type and death [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.08; CI 0.94–1.23] or the composite of death or MI (aHR = 1.07; CI 0.96–1.18). Separate propensity score‐matched analyses yielded similar results. In this analysis of kidney transplant recipients undergoing multivessel coronary revascularization, we found no difference between CABG and PCI in terms of survival or the composite of death and MI.     

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with reduced ejection fraction

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate comparative outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with reduced ejection fraction.MethodsAll patients from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 2011 to 2018 who had reduced preoperative ejection fraction (<50%) and underwent CABG or PCI for coronary revascularization were included in this study. Patients were risk-adjusted with propensity matching (1:1) and primary outcomes included long-term survival, readmission, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).ResultsA total of 2000 patients were included in the current study, consisting of CABG (n = 1553) and PCI (n = 447) cohorts with a mean ejection fraction of 35% ± 9.53%. Propensity matching yielded a 1:1 match with 324 patients in each cohort, controlling for all baseline characteristics. Thirty-day mortality was similar for PCI versus CABG (6.2% vs 4.9%; P = .49). Overall mortality over the study follow-up period (median, 3.23 years; range, 1.83-4.98 years) was significantly higher for the PCI cohort (37.4% vs 21.3%; P < .001). Total hospital readmissions (24.1% vs 12.9%; P = .001), cardiac readmissions (20.4% vs 11.1%; P = .001), myocardial infarction event (7.7% vs 1.8%; P = .001), MACCE (41.4% vs 23.8%; P < .001), and repeat revascularization (6.5% vs 2.6%; P = .02) occurred more frequently in the PCI cohort. Freedom from MACCE at 1 year (74.4% vs 87.0%; P < .001) and 5 years (54.5% vs 74.0%; P < .001) was significantly lower for the PCI cohort. On multivariable cox regression analysis, CABG (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.73; P < .001) was significantly associated with improved survival. Prior liver disease, dialysis, diabetes, and peripheral artery disease were the most significant predictors of mortality. The cumulative incidence of hospital readmission was lower for the CABG cohort (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.71; P < .001). Multivariable cox regression for MACCE (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.58; P < .001) showed significantly fewer events for the CABG cohort.ConclusionsPatients with reduced ejection fraction who underwent CABG had significantly improved survival, lower MACCE, and fewer repeat revascularization procedures compared with patients who underwent PCI.     

Outcomes of Interventional Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BackgroundCardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death among kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Trials routinely exclude patients with end-stage renal disease when assessing the effect of coronary artery revascularization. We looked to compare long-term outcomes in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) before KT with those managed medically.MethodsWe identified all patients who underwent coronary artery catheterization before KT from January 2008 to November 2019 at the Cleveland Clinic. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.ResultsA total of 272 patients were included, of whom 52 (19.11%) underwent PCI, and the remaining 220 patients were managed medically. The median age in the PCI group was 57.4 years (interquartile range [IQR], 46.9-61.2 years), whereas it was 53.9 years (IQR, 44.6-61 years) in the group medically managed. Baseline characteristics including sex, race, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and hyperlipidemia were comparable in both groups. The median time to KT was 2.4 years (IQR, 1-5 years) in the PCI group vs 1.2 years (IQR, 0.6-3.3 years) in the medically managed group (P = .001). Among patients who underwent PCI, 40.4% had single vessel disease and 59.6% had multivessel disease compared with 16.8% and 28.6%, respectively, in the medically managed group (P < .001). Overall, there was no difference in mortality in the PCI group compared with the medically managed group after 10 years of follow-up (P = .416).ConclusionsPatients with coronary artery disease can be safely treated with PCI before KT and have comparable outcomes to those who are managed medically.     

Early and late outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for dialysis patients

Abstract Background: Advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug‐eluting stents (DES) have impacted clinical practice. However, the efficacy of DES for dialysis patients still remains controversial. This study compares the early and long‐term clinical outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and PCI with DES in dialysis patients. Methods: A retrospective review was performed in 125 dialysis patients treated between 2004 and 2007. Fifty‐eight patients underwent CABG and 67 underwent PCI with DES. The overall death, cardiac death, and cardiac‐related event rates were analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method. For the risk‐adjusted comparisons, multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were used. Results: The preoperative characteristics of the patients were similar except for the ejection fraction (p = 0.002) and the number of diseased vessels (p < 0.001). The 30‐day mortality was 0 in both groups. The overall survival rates at one, three, and five years were 84.2%, 64.7%, and 56.2% in CABG group and 88.2%, 75.5%, and 61.7% in DES group, respectively (p = 0.202). The rates of freedom from cardiac‐related events at one, three, and five years were 76.6%, 68.1%, and 48.6%, and 63.0%, 31.4%, and 0% in CABG and DES groups (p < 0.001), respectively, including seven (10%) late thromboses in the DES group. Although the risk‐adjusted analysis showed no significant difference for overall and cardiac death rates, the rates of cardiac‐related events and graft/stent failure were significantly higher in the DES group. Conclusions: CABG is superior for revascularization in dialysis patients compared with PCI using DES in terms of freedom from cardiac‐related events. (J Card Surg 2012;27:281‐287)     

Clinical evidence versus patients’ perception of coronary revascularization

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been developed as revascularization techniques for coronary artery disease. CABG offers a survival advantage over medical therapy, especially for high-risk coronary patients, whereas PCI is the most frequent initial procedure to treat multi-vessel coronary artery disease, because it is less invasive. However, PCI has been found to confer no additional benefit with respect to myocardial infarction (MI) or death. The SYNTAX trial compared the outcomes of patients with left main and/or three-vessel coronary artery disease treated with CABG versus PCI using drug-eluting stents. The 4-year results showed that all-cause mortality and cardiac death were both significantly higher in the PCI group than in the CABG group. Despite extensive evidence of the advantages of CABG over PCI with respect to death or MI, PCI is recommended more often and CABG less often than indicated in the guidelines. Patients with coronary artery disease should receive unbiased information about the risks and benefits of each procedure and the alternatives. A multidisciplinary approach, referred to as “the Heart Team”, could help to improve the informed consent process when recommending revascularization treatment for coronary artery disease.     

Long-term survival after vascular surgery: specific influence of cardiac factors and implications for preoperative evaluation

OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify specific determinants of long-term cardiac events and survival in patients undergoing major arterial operations after preoperative cardiac risk stratification by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. A secondary goal was to define the potential long-term protective effect of previous coronary revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] or percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) in patients with vascular disease. METHODS: Four hundred fifty-nine patients underwent risk stratification (high, intermediate, low) before 534 consecutive elective or urgent (<24 hours after presentation) open cerebrovascular, aortic, or lower limb reconstruction procedures between August 1996 and January 2000. Long-term follow-up (mean, 56 +/- 14 months) was possible in 97% of patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival data. Long-term prognostic variables were identified with the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model and contingency table analysis censoring early (<30 days) perioperative deaths. RESULTS: While 5-year survival was 72% for the overall cohort, cardiac causes accounted for only 24% of all deaths, and new cardiac events (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, unstable angina, new coronary angiography, new CABG or PCI, cardiac death) affected only 4.6% of patients per year during follow-up. High cardiac risk stratification level (hazards ratio [HR], 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-3.4), adverse perioperative cardiac events (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia; HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.1), and age (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6) were independently prognostic for latemortality. Preoperative cardiac risk levels also correlated with new cardiac event rates ( P < .01) and late cardiac mortality ( P = .02). Modestly improved survival in patients who had undergone CABG or PCI less than 5 years before vascular operations compared with those who had undergone revascularization 5 or more years previously and those at high risk without previous coronary intervention (73% vs 58% vs 62% 5-year survival; P = .02) could be demonstrated with univariate testing, but not with multivariate analysis. Type of operation, urgency, noncardiac complications, and presence of diabetes did not affect long-term survival. CONCLUSION: Despite cardiac events being a less common cause of late mortality after vascular surgery, perioperative cardiac factors (age, preoperative risk level, early cardiac complications) are the primary determinants of patient longevity. Patients undergoing more recent (<5 years) CABG or PCI before vascular surgery do not have an obvious survival advantage compared with patients at high cardiac risk without previous coronary interventions.     

Factors affecting post minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting incidence of myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality of cardiac origin

In the present study we identify parameters which influence the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and cardiac mortality after minimal invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCABG). With a mean follow-up of 30+/-11.2 months, 390 patients were assessed with Wald test-corrected chi(2) analysis to identify preoperative factors which correlate with a higher incidence of post-MIDCABG MI, PCI, CABG and mortality from cardiac causes. We found an increased incidence of postoperative MI in patients with 2-vessel (8.7%) and 3-vessel (7.7%) vs. 1.3% 1-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) (P=0.023), and in patients with preceding cardiac procedure (CABG and PCI: 8.4% vs. 2.0% without, P=0.023). Also diabetes was associated with higher post-MIDCABG frequency of MI (P=0.035). Severity of angina was associated with lesser post-MIDCAB-PCI (P=0.011) while preceding CABG predicted a higher incidence (P=0.012). Preoperative low ejection fraction (EF) (multivariate, P<0.001), preoperative MI (P=0.007) and extent of CAD (P=0.001) were associated with a higher post-MIDCABG mortality. None of the parameters correlated with subsequent CABG MIDCABG. The extent and history of CAD, history of cardiac interventions and low EF seem to influence the outcome adversely and should be considered deciding pro or against the MIDCAB-option.     

Predictors of mid-term symptom recurrence, adverse cardiac events and mortality in 591 unselected off-pump coronary artery bypass graft patients

BACKGROUND: Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting is gaining popularity; however, decreased mid-term graft patency and increased coronary reintervention rates are reported. STUDY DESIGN: Five hundred and ninety-one consecutive unselected patients underwent OPCAB grafting from February 2000 to April 2004 (mean follow-up 38.54 +/- 0.54 months). One hundred and thirteen patients had < or =2 grafts, and four hundred and seventy-eight had > or =3 grafts. At least one radial artery graft was present in 398 patients, 328 received postoperative Clopidogrel, and 391 received postoperative statins. History of at least one percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was present in 192 patients. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients developed recurrent angina, nine had myocardial infraction, and twenty underwent coronary reintervention. Five patients died of sudden cardiac death. Overall mortality was 4.9% during follow-up (29 patients). Postoperative Clopidogrel and statins as well as intraoperative shunt use significantly decreased symptom recurrence and adverse cardiac events. Diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, prior history of PCI, and utilization of radial artery grafts were positive predictors of symptom recurrence and adverse cardiac events. Utilization of radial artery grafts, history of PCI as well as low preoperative ejection fraction increased mortality. Number of bypass grafts, type of conduit, grafted territory, hyperlipidemia, or prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) did not influence symptom recurrence, adverse cardiac events or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: OPCAB grafting can be performed with low symptom recurrence, adverse cardiac events, and mortality rates. Modification of intra- and postoperative management strategies may improve outcomes.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting within 30 days after treatment of acute myocardial infarctions with angioplasty or fibrinolysis – a surgical substudy of DANAMI‐2

Objective—To calculate the incidence and analyse the indications and outcome after surgical revascularization within the first 30 days after randomization of 1572 patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) associated with ST‐segment elevation (STEMI).

Design—Data regarding the patients undergoing heart surgery within the first 30 days after randomization were collected.

Results—Three patients (0.2%) with acute STEMI and randomized to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) underwent emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A total of 50 patients (3.2%), 30 in the PCI group and 20 in the fibrinolysis group were revascularized by surgery within the first 30 days after randomization. The most frequent indication for surgery in both groups was unstable angina pectoris, followed by left main stenosis. The incidence of postoperative complications was higher compared with the outcome after elective CABG.

Conclusions—The incidence of emergency CABG in this study was low (0.2%) after treatment of acute MI with either PCI or fibrinolysis. The overall incidence within 30 days was 3.2%, however, the mortality is increased with a 30‐day mortality of 10% in this high‐risk patient group.     

Routine Coronary Angiography is Still the Key Test for Patients Eligible for Lung Transplantation Also for Those With No Symptoms and With High Risk of Coronary Artery Disease

BackgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) has a considerable morbidity and mortality effect on the outcomes of a lung transplant. Currently, coronary angiography is performed as part of the pretransplant evaluation process. Unfortunately, there are no clear guidelines about performing cardiac angiography in lung transplant candidates.BackgroundThe aim of our work is to find a correlation between cardiovascular risk and coronary arterial status to optimize the selection of patients for coronary angiography prior transplantation.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 48 patients in whom coronary angiography and cardiac catheterization was performed during assessment for bilateral lung transplantation at the Medical University of Gdańsk from 2018 to 2021. The coronary artery disease status was classified into 2 categories: without any stenosis and with stenosis. For each patient, the 10-year cardiovascular risk was estimated by using a Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation calculator modified for the Polish population.ResultsCoronary stenosis was detected in 15 patients during angiography (31%). The group with coronary stenosis had a median SCORE risk of 8%, which is considered as high risk, and in patients without stenosis it was 5%, which is also considered a high risk. Median mean pulmonary artery pressure in patients with stenosis was the same as that in patients without stenosis (23 mm Hg).ConclusionsCAD among lung transplant candidates cannot be predicted by risk factors, so coronary angiography is very important as a part of the evaluation process. Because pulmonary hypertension has a big impact on surveillance after transplantation, performing heart catheterization during the qualification process is crucial.