首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Current treatments for patients with prostate cancer generally are successful. However, a subset of patients identified with high-risk prostate cancer likely will recur after local therapy. The optimal treatment plan for these patients has not been determined. The search for an effective treatment for this subset of prostate cancer patients has focused on multi-modality therapy. Although chemotherapy has proven clinical and survival benefits for patients with metastatic disease, its role in earlier stages of the disease is being investigated. Current data have demonstrated that neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy is relatively safe and feasible. There also is emerging evidence of clinical benefit when early chemotherapy is combined with local treatments. Further investigation through prospective, randomized trials is critical to define the precise role of this modality in high-risk populations.  相似文献   

9.
BackgroundThe coronavirus pandemic changed how we manage and operate patients in orthopaedic practice. Although elective orthopaedic procedures were halted to prevent spread of the disease as well as sustain supplies of essential protective equipment and healthcare workers, trauma services were continued. We studied the orthopaedic trauma cases operated over 6 months of the pandemic, and discuss the protocols used to minimize disease spread.MethodsData was collected for all orthopaedic emergency cases operated at our centre from 1 st March – 10 th August 2020. During this time specific protocols were used for first aid, pre-operative care, inside the operation theatre, post-operative stay as well as for follow ups.ResultsA total of 851 patients were operated. A sharp decline in surgeries was seen during the lockdown. Average stay in the hospital was 4 days. Only 44% of the patients came for follow-up visits. None of the contacted patients or their relatives developed symptoms or tested positive for COVID after discharge.ConclusionMultiple waves and various mutant strains of COVID-19 have made this pandemic longer than expected. Elective orthopaedic cases cannot be ignored for forever, as it leads to poor quality of life and an increasing burden of such patients. We suggest, that using the protocols used at our centre, we have successfully operated on cases without risking spread of the virus. Thus, we believe it’s time to reinstate elective orthopaedic procedures, in a phased manner.  相似文献   

10.
11.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of two different surgical techniques for the repair of acute type A dissection: open distal anastomosis under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) compared with distal aortic clamping on hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (ACPB). Between January 2000 and July 2008, 82 patients underwent DHCA and 42 had ACPB. Major morbidity, operative mortality and five-year actuarial survival were compared between groups. There were no significant differences in the preoperative characteristics. Operative mortality (17% in DHCA vs. 21% in ACPB, P=0.63), reoperation for bleeding (20% in DHCA vs. 34% in ACPB, P=0.16) and stroke rates (16 DHCA vs. 24% in ACPB, P=0.33) were comparable between the two groups. Actuarial five-year survival rates were 74% for DHCA vs. 73% for ACPB, P=0.99. No significant differences in operative mortality, major morbidity and actuarial five-year survival were observed between DHCA and ACPB. There are some practical technical advantages if the distal anastomosis is performed in an open manner. More studies are required to determine the fate of the false lumen between the two techniques.  相似文献   

12.

Background

With the general increase in human lifespan, cardiac surgeons are faced with treating an increasing number of elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate early and late results of surgery for aortic dissection in patients older than 70 years of age compared with those younger than 70 years and to clarify the clinical problems related to this subset of patients.

Methods

Between 1976 and 2001, 315 patients underwent emergency operation for acute type A dissection: 245 were younger than 70 years (group 1) and 70 patients were 70 years of age and older (group 2). Early and late outcomes of both groups were compared.

Results

The hospital mortality rates were 20.5% in group 1 and 17.6% in group 2 (p = 0.751). The mean extracorporeal circulation time was 192.6 ± 65.2 minutes and 185.7 ± 58.4 minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.42). The mean cross-clamp time was 116.3 ± 45.8 minutes and 100 ± 36.7 minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.009). Actuarial survival rates were 77.1% after a mean follow-up time of 259 ± 9 months for patients of group 1 and 80% after 77 ± 5 months for patients of group 2, without any statistically significant difference (p = 0.619).

Conclusions

No significant differences were observed in the 30-day mortality and actuarial survival between the two groups. Therefore we believe that surgery for type A acute aortic dissection in patients 70 years of age or older can be performed with acceptable risk of death and satisfactory results.  相似文献   

13.
BACKGROUND: With the progressive aging of Western populations, cardiac surgeons are faced with treating an increasing number of elderly patients. Controversy exists as to whether the expenditure of health care resources on the growing elderly populations represents a cost-effective approach to resource management. The potential to avoid surgery in patients with little chance of survival and poor quality of life would spare unnecessary suffering, reduce operative mortality, and enhance the use of scarce resources. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 24 consecutive patients aged 80 years or older (mean age 83 years, range 80-93 years) who underwent operations for acute type A dissection from 1985 through 1999. No patient with acute type A dissection was refused surgery because of age or concomitant disease. Seventeen patients were men. Preoperatively, none of the patients was moribund, although 66% had hemodynamic instability and 41% experienced cerebral ischemia. All patients had one or more associated pathologic conditions. Hospital mortality and morbidity models, based on our overall experience with 197 patients operated on for acute type A aortic dissection during the period of the study, were developed by means of multivariate logistic regression with preoperative and intraoperative variables used as independent predictors of outcome. RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 83%. Intraoperative mortality was 33%. All patients who survived the operation had one or more postoperative complications. Mean hospital stay was 37 days with a total of 314 days in the intensive care unit (average 19 days, median 17 days). None of the survivors (4 patients) discharged from the hospital was able to function independently and their survival at 6 months was 0%. Statistical analysis of the overall experience with operations for type A acute aortic dissection confirmed that age in excess of 80 years is the most important independent patient risk factor associated with 30-day mortality and morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Operations for acute type A dissection performed on octogenarians involve increased hospital mortality and morbidity. Short-term survival is unfavorable and is associated with a poor quality of life. Without additional corroborative studies to endorse the present findings, the use of age as a parameter to limit access of patients to expensive medical resources remains an unsubstantiated concept. In the context of acute type A aortic dissection, however, the hypothesis that older patients should be denied such a complicated surgical intervention to conserve resources is supported by the presented data.  相似文献   

14.
15.
16.
17.
Is acute type A aortic dissection a true surgical emergency?   总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3  
Untreated acute aortic dissection involving the ascending aorta (type A) is associated with a high early mortality owing to rupture. Despite advancements in surgical technique and critical care, early mortality remains high. Operative mortality may be related to the technical challenges associated with intervening on the acutely dissected aorta as well as the multiorgan insult it induces. In this article, we review our approach to acute type A aortic dissection with regard to diagnosis, initial medical management, surgical repair, and timing of repair.  相似文献   

18.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of our surgical strategy for acute aortic dissection based on the extent of the dissection and the site of the entry, with special emphasis on resection of all dissected aortic segments if technically possible. METHODS: Between January 1995 and March 2001, 43 consecutive patients underwent operations for acute aortic dissection. In all patients the distal repair was performed under circulatory arrest without the use of an aortic cross-clamp. Fifteen patients underwent aortic arch replacement with additional reconstruction of supra-aortic vessels in 3 patients. Complete replacement of all dissected tissue could be achieved in 21 patients (group 1). Because of the distal extent of the dissection beyond the aortic arch, replacement of all the dissected tissue was not possible in 22 patients (group 2). RESULTS: Early mortality was 4.7% (2 patients), and the incidence of perioperative cerebrovascular events was 7.0% (3 patients). All of these events occurred in group 2 (p < 0.025). During the follow-up period of 6 years or less, 5 patients died, all from causes not related to the aorta or the aortic valve. A persisting patent false lumen was observed in 14 of the 36 surviving patients (39%). CONCLUSIONS: Extended replacement of the dissected ascending aorta and aortic arch can be done with good early and midterm results, even though it requires a complex surgical technique. Therefore we advocate complete replacement of the dissected parts of the aorta in all patients in whom this is technically possible.  相似文献   

19.
20.
Background. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the significance of aortic rupture on clinical outcome in patients after aortic repair for acute type A dissection.

Methods. One hundred and twenty patients underwent aortic operations with resection of the intimal tear and open distal anastomosis. Median age was 60 years (range 16 to 87); 78 were male. Thirty-six patients had only ascending aortic replacement, 82 had hemiarch repair, and 2 had the entire arch replaced. Retrograde cerebral perfusion was utilized in 66 patients (53%). Rupture defined as free blood in the pericardial space was present in 60 patients (50%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the risk factors for mortality and neurologic dysfunction.

Results. Overall hospital mortality rate was 24.2% ± 4.0% (± 70% confidence level) but did not differ between patients with aortic rupture or without (p = 0.83). The incidence of permanent neurologic dysfunction was 9.4% overall, 10.5% with rupture and 8.3% without rupture (p = 0.75). Multivariate analysis revealed absence of retrograde cerebral perfusion and any postoperative complication as statistically significant indicators for in-hospital mortality (p < 0.05). Overall 1- and 5-year survival was 85.3% and 33.7%; among discharged patients, survival in the nonruptured group was 89% and 37%, versus 81% and 31% in the ruptured group (p = 0.01).

Conclusions. Aortic rupture at the time of surgery does not increase the risk of hospital mortality or permanent neurologic complications in patients with acute type A dissections. However, aortic rupture at the time of surgery does influence long-term survival.  相似文献   


设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号