Renal allograft immunosuppression: I. Early inflammatory and rejection episodes in triple drug treatment compared to double drug combinations or cyclosporin monotherapy

Abstract. We have investigated the impact of triple drug immunosuppression on the occurrence of early inflammatory episodes, as detected by fine needle aspiration biopsy, and of episodes of clinical rejection during the immediate postoperative period. The prospective component of this study includes 128 consecutive first cadaveric renal transplant recipients receiving triple drug treatment consisting of azathioprine (Aza), cyclosporin (CyA) and methylprednisolone (MP). For controls we have used three historical groups: one immunosuppressed with Aza and MP (group A), another with CyA monotherapy (group B), and the third with CyA together with MP (group C) in equivalent drug dosages. On the average, 0. 8 episodes of inflammation per patient were recorded during the immediate postoperative period of 30 days with triple drug treatment. This was significantly less than the 1. 3 episodes in patients receiving Aza and MP (P < 0. 01), the 1. 7 episodes in patients on CyA monotherapy (P < 0. 001), or the 1. 6 episodes in patients receiving CyA together with MP (P < 0. 001). Although the first episode of inflammation commenced concurrently in each group and the peak intensity of inflammation was the same, the mean duration of inflammation was significantly shorter-2. 7 days-under triple drug treatment than the 7. 8–11. 7 days for controls (P < 0. 001). The frequency of rejection episodes under triple treatment was also significantly lower-0. 2 per patient-than the 0. 8 per patient in controls (P < 0. 001). The first rejection episode occurred later in the triple drug treatment group-on the average, on day 15. 2-than in the historical controls (on days 7. 7–11. 7). There was, however, no difference in the duration of rejection. There were no differences in patient survival between the four groups. Graft survival was 97% at 10 weeks for triple drug-treated recipients and 79%, 68%, and 87% for first grafts in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Disregarding a minor demographic bias for the triple drug-treated group with respect to preformed antibodies and preoperative dialysis treatment, the study suggests that the triple drug protocol, in the short run, is superior to any conceivable double drug combination or CyA monotherapy.     

Renal allograft immunosuppression

Serum lipid and lipoprotein profiles were performed in order to investigate lipid abnormalities 2 years post-transplantation in first cadaveric renal allograft recipients immunosuppressed with cyclosporin (CyA), azathioprine (Aza), and methylprednisolone (MP), or with any combination of two drugs. CyA was used in low doses. Total serum cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, HDL2 cholesterol, HDL3 cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1, and apolipoprotein B were determined in 88 prospectively randomized patients with functioning grafts. When considering only the patients who remained on the original randomized treatment, there were no significant differences between the four groups in any of the measured variables. Mean total cholesterol was highest in the group receiving Aza and MP (6.8 mmol/l) and lowest in the group receiving triple therapy (5.8 mmol/l; NS). Mean triglyceride level was highest in the group receiving Aza and MP (2.3 mmol/l) versus 1.8–2.2 mmol/l in the groups receiving triple therapy, Aza+CyA, and CyA+MP. For all patients mean triglyceride level was highest in the group receiving Aza and MP (2.7 mmol/l) and lowest in the group receiving triple therapy (1.7 mmol/l; P<0.05). Mean HDL cholesterol ranged from 1.5 to 1.6 mmol/l in all groups. Neither CyA concentration nor CyA or MP dose correlated with cholesterol or triglyceride concentration. However, the average MP dose was twice as high in the group receiving Aza and MP as in the other two groups employing steroids. Serum cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were related to body mass index (r=0.28, P=0.045 and r=0.30, P=0.029, respectively). Hyperlipidemia was most common in the group receiving Aza and MP. The frequency of hypercholesterolemia (serum cholesterol level >6.5 mmol/l) was 18%, 45%, 60%, and 35% for the patients continuing with the originally randomized treatment in the groups receiving triple therapy, Aza+CyA, Aza+MP, and CyA+MP, respectively. In a normal Finnish reference population, 35% of all males and 31% of all females have a serum cholesterollevel above 6.5 mmol/l. Thus, only patients receiving Aza and MP had a clearly higher frequency of hypercholesterolemia than that found in a normal population. Taken together, this study shows no lipid abnormalities associated with the use of low-dose CyA for 2 years after transplantation. Hyperlipidemia occurring after transplantation is probably multifactorial and more associated with other risk factors than with the immunosuppressive therapy.     

Renal allograft immunosuppression: IV. Comparison of Iipid and lipoprotein profiles in blood using double and triple immunosuppressive drug combinations

Abstract. Serum lipid and lipoprotein profiles were performed in order to investigate lipid abnormalities 2 years post-transplantation in first cadaveric renal allograft recipients immunosuppressed with cyclosporin (CyA), azathioprine (Aza), and methylprednisolone (MP), or with any combination of two drugs. CyA was used in low doses. Total serum cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, HDL2 cholesterol, HDL3 cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1, and apolipoprotein B were determined in 88 prospectively randomized patients with functioning grafts. When considering only the patients who remained on the original randomized treatment, there were no significant differences between the four groups in any of the measured variables. Mean total cholesterol was highest in the group receiving Aza and MP (6.8 mmol/l) and lowest in the group receiving triple therapy (5.8 mmol/l; NS). Mean triglyceride level was highest in the group receiving Aza and MP (2.3 mmol/1) versus 1.8–2.2 mmol/l in the groups receiving triple therapy, Aza + CyA, and CyA + MP. For all patients mean triglyceride level was highest in the group receiving Aza and MP (2.7 mmol/1) and lowest in the group receiving triple therapy (1.7 mmol/l; P<0.05). Mean HDL cholesterol ranged from 1.5 to 1.6 mmol/l in all groups. Neither CyA concentration nor CyA or MP dose correlated with cholesterol or triglyceride concentration. However, the average MP dose was twice as high in the group receiving Aza and MP as in the other two groups employing steroids. Serum cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were related to body mass index (r= 0.28, P= 0.045 and r= 0.30, P= 0.029, respectively). Hyperlipidemia was most common in the group receiving Aza and MP, The frequency of hypercholesterolemia (serum cholesterol level > 6.5 mmol/1) was 18%, 45%, 60%, and 35% for the patients continuing with the originally randomized treatment in the groups receiving triple therapy, Aza + CyA, Aza + MP, and CyA + MP, respectively. In a normal Finnish reference population, 35% of all males and 31% of allfemaleshaveaserumcholesterollevel above 6.5 mmol/l. Thus, only patients receiving Aza and MP had a clearly higher frequency of hypercholesterolemia than that found in a normal population. Taken together, this study shows no lipid abnormalities associated with the use of low-dose CyA for 2 years after transplantation. Hyperlipidemia occurring after transplantation is probably multifactorial and more associated with other risk factors than with the immunosuppressive therapy.     

Renal allograft immunosuppression: VI. Triple drug therapy versus immunosuppressive double drug combinations: histopathological findings in renal allografts

Abstract. The long-term effects of different immunosuppressive drugs and regimens on renal allograft histology are virtually unknown. Therefore, in order to investigate the long-term effects of triple drug treatment versus different combinations of two immunosuppressive drugs on allograft histology, a prospective, randomized trial was performed. One group received triple therapy consisting of low-dose cyclosporin (CyA), azathioprine (Aza), and methylprednisolone (MP), and three groups received combinations of two drugs, i.e., Aza plus CyA, Aza plus MP, and CyA plus MP. At 2 years, there were no significant differences with regard to graft (80%) or patient (87%) survival, or to graft function between the four groups. After 2 years, a protocol core biopsy was taken of all 102 patients having a functioning graft. Of these patients, 61 (60%) were still following the original, randomized treatment protocol; in the remaining cases, changes had occurred in the original protocol and so these cases were considered drop-outs in this study. Histological specimens were examined blindly by two independent observers. Most of the 34 histological variables examined showed no changes. Diffuse fibrosis was most frequent in the CyA plus MP group (70%) and significantly more severe than in the triple therapy group. Mesangial matrix increase in glomeruli was significantly less common in the triple therapy group (8%) than in any one of the double drug combination groups (47%). Two other changes in glomeruli - Bowman capsular thickening and global glomerular sclerosis - were also less frequent in the triple therapy group. Vascular changes other than intimal proliferation (39%) and arteriosclerosis (24%) were uncommon in all groups and least frequent in the triple therapy group. Isometric vacuolation in proximal tubules was found in every group using CyA. It was least prominent in the triple therapy group and most prominent in the CyA plus MP group; it was not seen in the Aza plus MP group. Other specific findings for the groups treated with CyA could not be identified. To summarize, the changes shown were mild and rather similarly distributed in the four treatment groups. Histopathological alterations comparable with chronic rejection, i.e., persistent interstitial inflammation with pyroninophilic cells, vascular intimal proliferation, and arteriosclerosis, were seen in all groups, but these changes were least prominent in the group receiving triple therapy.     

Renal allograft immunosuppression

A prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate the impact of four different conversion protocols on graft outcome in long-term follow-up. Between January 1986 and May 1987, 128 patients with first cadaveric kidnery allografts were randomized at the time of transplantation to four treatment groups of 32 patients each, to be assigned 10 weeks post-transplantation. During the first 10 weeks, all patients received triple therapy with low-dose azathioprine (Aza), cyclosporin (CyA), and methylprednisolone (MP). After 10 weeks, one group continued with triple therapy (group A) while the three other groups received different combinations of two drugs, namely, Aza and CyA (group B), Aza and MP (group C), or CyA and MP (group D). Withdrawal of MP (group B) or especially of CyA (group C) was associated with 4/29 (14%) and 10/28 (36%) acute rejection episodes, respectively, for 60 days after conversion. All rejections were mild and reversible. There were no rejections after Aza withdrawal or in the group that continued on triple therapy during the corresponding time period. The most common reason for dropping out after withdrawal, for those patients who could not continue on the originally randomized medication, was azathioprine intolerance (n=12). Five patients were switched back to triple therapy after CyA withdrawal due to rejection. Steroid intolerance was rare and CyA in low doses was very well tolerated. At 1 year there were no statistically significant differences in graft survival between groups A, B, C, and D-81%, 88%, 88%, and 88%, respecively-or in patient survival-88%, 88%, 88%, and 97%, respectively. For those patients continuing with the originally randomized treatment protocol, there were no differences in patient or graft survival either, the means being 91% and 89%, respectively. The most common cause of death after withdrawal was cardiovascular in nature, and there were no more fatal infections under triple drug treatment than with double drug regimens. There were no statistically significant differences in mean serum creatinine values at 1 year. The median serum creatinine values for groups A, B, C, and D were 112, 132, 133, and 133 mol/l, respectively. At 1 year the mean CyA dose in the groups that continued with CyA was 3.5–4.2 mg/kg per day and CyA concentrations were equal.     

Renal allograft immunosuppression: II. A randomized trial of withdrawal of one drug in triple drug immunosuppression

Abstract. A prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate the impact of four different conversion protocols on graft outcome in long-term follow-up. Between January 1986 and May 1987, 128 patients with first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized at the time of transplantation to four treatment groups of 32 patients each, to be assigned 10 weeks post-transplantation. During the first 10 weeks, all patients received triple therapy with low-dose azathioprine (Aza), cyclosporin (CyA), and methylprednisolone (MP). After 10 weeks, one group continued with triple therapy (group A) while the three other groups received different combinations of two drugs, namely, Aza and CyA (group B), Aza and MP (group C), or CyA and MP (group D). Withdrawal of MP (group B) or especially of CyA (group C) was associated with 4/29 (14%) and 10/28 (36%) acute rejection episodes, respectively, for 60 days after conversion. All rejections were mild and reversible. There were no rejections after Aza withdrawal or in the group that continued on triple therapy during the corresponding time period. The most common reason for dropping out after withdrawal, for those patients who could not continue on the originally randomized medication, was azathioprine intolerance (n= 12). Five patients were switched back to triple therapy after CyA withdrawal due to rejection. Steroid intolerance was rare and CyA in low doses was very well tolerated. At 1 year there were no statistically significant differences in graft survival between groups A, B, C, and D-81 %, 88%, 88%, and 88%, respectively-or in patient survival-88%, 88%, 88%, and 97%, respectively. For those patients continuing with the originally randomized treatment protocol, there were no differences in patient or graft survival either, the means being 91% and 89%, respectively. The most common cause of death after withdrawal was cardiovascular in nature, and there were no more fatal infections under triple drug treatment than with double drug regimens. There were no statistically significant differences in mean serum creatinine values at 1 year. The median serum creatinine values for groups A, B, C, and D were 112, 132, 133, and 133 μmol/l, respectively. At 1 year the mean CyA dose in the groups that continued with CyA was 3. 5–4. 2 mg/kg per day and CyA concentrations were equal.     

Renal allograft immunosuppression

The long-term effects of different immunosuppressive drugs and regimens on renal allograft histology are virtually unknown. Therefore, in order to investigate the long-term effects of triple drug treatment versus different combinations of two immunosuppressive drugs on allograft histology, a prospective, randomized trial was performed. One group received triple therapy consisting of low-dose cyclosporin (CyA), azathioprine (Aza), and methylprednisolone (MP), and three groups received combinations of two drugs, i.e., Aza plus CyA, Aza plus MP, and CyA plus MP. At 2 years, there were no significant differences with regard to graft (80%) or patient (87%) survival, or to graft function between the four groups. After 2 years, a protocol core biopsy was taken of all 102 patients having a functioning graft. Of these patients, 61 (60%) were still following the original, randomized treatment protocol; in the remaining cases, changes had occurred in the original protocol and so these cases were considered drop-outs in this study. Histological specimens were examined blindly by two independent observers. Most of the 34 histological variables examined showed no changes. Diffuse fibrosis was most frequent in the CyA plus MP group (70%) and significantly more severe than in the triple therapy group. Mesangial matrix increase in glomeruli was significantly less common in the triple therapy group (8%) than in any one of the double drug combination groups (47%). Two other changes in glomeruli--Bowman capsular thickening and global glomerular sclerosis--were also less frequent in the triple therapy group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

骁悉和环孢素-A预防肾移植术后早期急性排斥反应

目的 探讨骁悉和环孢素－Ａ预防肾移植术后早期急性排斥反应的效果。方法 回顾性分析１９９７年１２月￣１９９９年１月临床资料完整肾移植患者１４６例,随访时间６￣１６个月。根据应用免疫抑制剂方案的不同分为硫唑嘌呤（Ａｚａ）组（环孢素－Ａ、泼尼松龙、Ａｚａ）和骁悉（ＭＭＦ）组（环孢素－Ａ、泼尼松、ＭＭＦ）。其中Ａｚａ组７８例,ＭＭＦ组６８例。所有受者术前行人类白细胞抗原（ＨＬＡ）配型,ＨＬＡ错配≤３个位点     

Azathioprine-cyclosporin A (CyA) double therapy versus CyA alone after the first rejection episode in kidney-transplanted patients under CyA: A randomized study

Abstract. A controlled trial was carried out in 78 kidney transplant recipients under cyclosporin A (CyA) monotherapy who had experienced a first rejection episode. Thirty-nine were randomly selected to receive azathioprine (AZA; 2 mg/kg per day) in combination with CyA (group AZA+), while the others continued to receive CyA alone (group AZA"). Four of the patients in the study died; three were in group AZA +the cause of their deaths was cardiovascular. Graft survival rates were 97% at 6,12, and 24 months postrejection in group AZA+as compared to 97%, 90%, and 81%, respectively, in group AZA" ( P < 0. 05 at 12 and 24 months). Significantly more patients were free of rejection with the double therapy than with CyA monotherapy (75% vs 51% at 12 months; P < 0. 05). In spite of the addition of a second immunosuppressive drug, the CyA dosages given and the CyA trough blood levels maintained were similar in the two groups. Serum creatinine was similar in patients with and without AZA. Infectious complications were also similar in both groups. A significant macrocytosis was the only side effect of AZA therapy. On the whole, these data show the benefit of CyA-AZA double therapy in the prevention of rejection recurrence without exposing patients to either increased risk of infection or serious side effects of AZA. Whether this double therapy should be systematically administered to all recipients or only after a first rejection episode is discussed.     

Post-transplant conversion from cyclosporin to azathioprine: effect on cardiovascular risk profile

The benefits of long-term cyclosporin (CyA) therapy are not yet established and must be weighed against its toxicity. We studied cardiovascular risk factors in 25 patients who received a kidney transplant between 1985 and 1989 and in whom CyA was discontinued. The protocol for discontinuing CyA involved starting azathioprine (Aza) and then weaning CyA over 6 weeks without changing the prednisone dose. Parameters collected from the patients' charts 3 months before (pre) and 3 months after conversion (post) and at the most current follow-up (cur) included serum creatinine, cholesterol, blood pressure, and anti-hypertensive medication. The severity of the hypertension was graded, based on a hypertension index reflecting the nature and dose of the anti-hypertensive medication. Of the 25 patients in whom CyA was discontinued, 2 experienced a rejection episode during conversion and were switched back to CyA; 1 patient had a rejection episode after conversion but remained on Aza. Converted patients demonstrated improved renal function (1/Cr pre 0.69±0.20, post 0.84±0.23, P<0.05), lower serum cholesterol levels (pre 6.8±1.0, post 5.8±1.2, P<0.05), lower mean arterial pressure (pre 111±14, post 102±8, P<0.05) and a lower hypertension index (pre 2.45±2.77, curr 1.62±1.70, P<0.05). Although conversion may carry some risk of acute rejection, it improves graft function and the cardiovascular risk profile significantly.     

Hypertension two years after renal transplantation: causes and consequences

The incidence of hypertension 2 years after renal transplantation and the possible causes of hypertension were studied retrospectively. A group of 93 patients treated with cyclosporin (CyA), azathioprine (Aza), and/or prednisolone (Pred) were compared to a group of 31 patients treated with Aza and Pred. There were more patients with hypertension in the CyA group (73%) than in the Aza group (58%). Hypertension before transplantation predisposed to hypertension after transplantation. After transplantation, hypertension was most common among patients with polycystic kidney disease (46%), chronic glomerulonephritis (67%), and diabetes (71%). The accumulated immunosuppressive medication (CyA/Pred) did not affect the occurrence of hypertension. Hypertensive patients had significantly poorer graft function than did normotensive patients (serum creatinine level 229 mol/l vs 162 mol/l, P<0.01). The 10-year graft survival was markedly impaired in the group with hypertension (42% vs 65% for normotensives, P<0.05). The 10-year patient survival was 59% vs 79% (P=NS). The study further confirms the frequent finding that hypertension has a negative effect on graft and patient survival rates.     

Renal allograft immunosuppression III. Triple therapy versus three different combinations of double drug treatment: two year results in kidney transplant patients

A prospective randomized trial was carried out to compare the long-term effects of triple therapy based on low-dose cyclosporin A (CyA), low-dose methylprednisolone (MP) and azathioprine (Aza) with three different double drug immunosuppressive regimens. After initial triple drug immunosuppression for 10 weeks, 128 patients were randomized into four different immunosuppressive groups: one group continued with triple therapy (group A) and the three other groups were treated with different combinations of two drugs: Aza and CyA (group B), Aza and MP (group C) and CyA and MP (group D). This report presents the 2-year results. For groups A, B, C and D, graft survivals were 75%, 78%, 84% and 81%, respectively, and patient survivals were 84%, 84%, 84% and 94%, respectively. After 2 years no patient had returned to dialysis in group C compared with one to three patients in every CyA-using group. However, at the end of the 2nd year, group C included more patients with deteriorating graft function than the other groups. Median serum creatinine was 107, 120, 139 and 129 mol/l for groups A, B, C and D, respectively. For the patients who remained on the original randomized protocol, there were no significant differences in graft function tests between the four groups, the median creatinine being 115, 115, 118 and 113 mol/l for groups A, B, C and D, respectively. Thus, no graft deterioration had occurred during the 2 years for these patients following the original protocol. Our results suggest that after initial triple therapy, patients with a first cadaveric kidney allograft can either continue with triple therapy or be converted to any of the double drug regimens without detriment to graft function, graft survival or patient survival for the next 2 years. This will allow more flexible and individual immunosuppressive treatment.     

Effect of reduced cyclosporin dosage on long-term renal allograft histology

The effect of different doses of cyclosporin (CyA) on the occurrence of histological lesions in renal allograft biopsies was investigated 2 years after transplantation. Biopsy findings were compared in three different groups of patients. In group 1, patients were immunosuppressed with CyA and prednisolone according to an early, high-dosage schedule (initial CyA dose 15–17.5 g/kg body weight); in group 2, they were treated with a medium CyA dose (initial dose 12 mg/kg), together with prednisolone; and in group 3, patients were given triple drug therapy consisting of low doses of CyA (initial dose 8 mg/kg), together with both azathioprine and prednisolone. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy were common findings in all groups, and on the basis of all biopsies, no difference could be found between the groups with respect to the relative volume of the renal cortical interstitium, which was used as a quantitative parameter for interstitial fibrosis. Likewise, no difference was found with respect to serum creatinine levels. When grafts, that showed signs of rejection (usually vascular rejection) in the biopsy were excluded (two in group 1, six in group 2, and ten in group 3), the mean interstitial volume was significantly lower in group 3 (triple drug therapy) than in the other groups. The serum creatinine levels were also significantly lower in group 3 than in group 1. Thus, chronic renal lesions could be ameliorated when CyA doses were lowered, but this appeared to entail an increased risk of acute or chronic vascular rejection.     

肾移植后免疫抑制用药方案与移植肾长期存活的关系

目的 分析肾移植后不同的免疫抑制用药方案对移植肾长期存活的影响。方法 根据不同用药组合将患者分为环孢素Ａ（ＣｓＡ）、硫唑嘌呤（Ａｚａ）和泼尼松（Ｐｒｅｄ）三联治疗组、ＣｓＡ和Ｐｒｅｄ二联治疗组、Ａｚａ和Ｐｒｅｄ传统二联治疗组。统计分析免疫抑制用药、排斥反应发生及人、肾存活情况;对发生排斥反应的患者追踪其发生排斥前１２个月内的药物更动情况。结果 采用三联治疗的患者人／肾５年存活率（８８％／７８％）显     

Long-term renal allograft function under maintenance immunosuppression with cyclosporin A or azathioprine

In order to evaluate long-term renal graft function, 149 cyclosporin A and prednisolone (CyA/P)-treated renal transplant recipients were compared with 119 azathioprine and prednisolone (Aza/P)-treated patients. Only patients who had a functioning graft for at least 1 year and who were maintained on their initial immunosuppressive protocol were included. The minimum follow-up period was 4 years. Renal graft function was estimated by yearly determinations of serum creatinine and creatinine clearance. The CyA/P-treated patients had a significantly higher serum creatinine and a significantly lower creatinine clearance at every point in time posttransplantation than Aza/P-treated patients (P<0.001). The evolution of renal graft function, as reflected in the line of regression for serum creatinine and creatinine clearance versus time, was estimated for each individual patient. There was an almost stable renal function, as assessed by the median of the slopes of the regression line for serum creatinine versus time in both groups. The median increase in serum creatinine was only 1.4 mol/l per year for Aza/P-treated patients and 2.4 mol/l per year for CyA/P-treated patients (difference NS). The median decline in creatinine clearance was 2.18 ml/min per 1.73 m²/year in the Aza/P group and 1.07 ml/min per 1.73 m²/year in the CyA/P group (P=0.05). In patients with a functioning graft for at least 5 years, creatinine clearance remained unchanged in both groups during the study period. In conclusion, renal graft function, as assessed by measurements of serum creatinine and creatinine clearance, remained essentially unchanged for at least 5 years after transplantation, regardless of the immunosuppressive protocol used. Thus, these data do not indicate a progression with time of the nephrotoxicity observed in CyA-treated patients.     

A randomized multicenter trial of cyclosporin and prednisolone versus cyclosporin,azathioprine, and prednisolone following primary living donor renal transplantation

A total of 195 consecutive recipients of primary living donor renal transplants were randomized to receive either cyclosporin (CyA) and prednisolone (double therapy) or CyA, prednisolone, and azathioprine (triple therapy). There was no significant difference in patient or graft survival, incidence of acute rejection episodes, or major complications between the groups. The graft survival at 5 years was 71.5% in patients receiving double therapy and 71.6% in patients receiving triple therapy. In a Cox regression analysis, recipient age and occurrence of acute rejection were the only independently significant variables affecting graft survival, whereas treatment schedule did not. Renal function was stable throughout the observation period and did not differ between the double and triple therapy groups. A linear regression analysis showed that recipient age, donor age, gender, and occurrence of acute rejection significantly influenced the serum creatinine level. This and previous similar prospective studies in cadaveric renal transplantation indicate that there is no advantage of routinely adding azathioprine to a double drug regimen.     

Comparison of Neoral and Sandimmun for induction and maintenance immunosuppression after kidney transplantation

We compared the mean trough level/dose (L/D) ratio, mean coefficient of variation (CV) of individual patients, and graft, patient, and rejection-free survival rates of 40 renal transplant recipients receiving Neoral (CyE) with 103 consecutive renal transplant recipients receiving Sandimmun (CyA). The mean L/D ratio on the 3rd post-transplant day (16.2 vs 11.8, P < 0.04), in the 1st week (24.6 vs 16.1; P < 0.03), and 1st month (39.1 vs 28.7; P < 0.05) were higher in the CyE group. In both groups the L/D ratio improved in proportion to the duration of time post-transplant and reached a maximum in the 3rd post-transplant month. In the early post-transplant period in particular, the number of patients achieving target levels was significantly higher, and the mean dose needed to achieve target levels lower, in the CyE group. The variation in trough levels, demonstrated by the CV, was lower in the CyE group (0.41 ± 0.14) than in the CyA group (0.62 ± 0.21; P < 0.005). Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival rates in the CyE group were 100 % and 96 %, respectively; these were similar to the 100 % and 95 % in the CyA group. The 1-year rejection-free survival rate in the CyE group was 61 % compared to 43 % in the CyA group (P < 0.02). We conclude that it is possible to obtain higher blood trough levels at lower doses by administering CyE, particularly in the early post-transplant period. The lower variability of trough levels and the higher L/D ratio in the CyE group, which are related to improved bioavailability of CyE, may explain the lower rejection rate among these patients. In this study, the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin (CyE) was found to be more beneficial and cost-effective as induction and maintenance immunosuppression than the conventional formulation (CyA). Received: 28 January 1997 Received after revision: 13 May 1997 Accepted: 15 May 1997     

Long-term beneficial effects of azathioprine addition to ongoing cyclosporine-prednisone protocol in renal transplantation

Delayed addition of azathioprine (Aza) to an ongoing cyclosporine-prednisone protocol was started 11.3 ± 9.9 months after renal transplantation in 31 patients. Group I (n = 10) had chronic renal function deterioration due to chronic rejection, group II (n = 11) had repeated or severe acute rejection episodes and group III (n = 10) had cyclosporine (Cs) toxicity despite drug tapering. In group I, SCr had risen over the 6 months prior to Aza addition (P < 0.05), renal function declining at a rate of ?0.13 ± 0.12 SCr^?1. In the 6 months post-Aza, renal function improved at a rate of 0.05 ± 0.07 SCr^?1, and during the entire follow-up at a rate of 0.05 ± 0.12 SCr^?1 (P < 0.01) with stable Cs levels. In group II the decline in renal function was greater, though the rate of decline was stopped after Aza. In group III, renal function improved in eight patients. After 23 ± 12 months of follow-up, 15 patients had improved graft function, two were stable, 12 had worsened (nine on dialysis) and two had died. Amelioration of chronic graft dysfunction can be achieved by delayed addition of Aza to Cs-prednisone-treated renal allograft patients with chronic rejection or Cs toxicity, with long-term beneficial effects in a high proportion of patients.     

The beneficial effects of oral nifedipine on cyclosporin-treated renal transplant recipients — a randomised prospective study

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that nifedipine will improve graft survival in cyclosporin A (CyA)-treated renal transplant recipients. One hundred and forty-seven patients were randomised to one of three regimens. Group A received CyA, 7 mg/kg per day, and prednisolone; group B followed the same regimen as group A plus oral nifedipine and group C received CyA, 4 mg/kg per day, prednisolone and azathioprine. Calcium channel blockers were avoided in groups A and C. The crude 2-year (P=0.0223) and 4-year (P=0.0181) graft survival was significantly better in group B (86% and 81%, respectively) than in group A (75% and 63%, respectively). Delayed initial function was seen least frequently in group B (10.2%) compared to groups A (31%) and C (28%; P<0.01). Group B also experienced fewer rejection episodes than groups A and C (P<0.05). We conclude that the combination of oral nifedipine and CyA significantly improves initial graft function, rejection frequency and long term graft survival.     

Late conversion from steroids to azathioprine in cyclosporin-treated renal graft recipients

In renal graft recipients primarily treated with cyclosporin and low-dose methylprednisolone, withdrawal of the long-term steroid medication increases the likelihood of developing rejection episodes. In order to determine the predictive value of clinical parameters and routine prewithdrawal graft biopsies for the risk of rejection, the authors studied 141 kidney recipients from whom steroids were with-drawn 7–9 months after transplantation in a clinically stable situation. Both the quality of the HLA-match and the results of prospective graft biopsies were found to correlate significantly to the occurrence of acute rejection. In order to investigate the influence of additional azathioprine medication on the incidence of acute rejections in recipients not receiving steroids, immunosuppression was continued with cyclosporin monotherapy in 88 patients and with cyclosporin plus azathioprine in 53 patients. The risk of developing rejection episodes was significantly reduced from 48% after 1 year on monotherapy to 28% after the addition of azathioprine medication.