Radiological treatment of retained bile duct stones following recent surgery using glucagons

BACKGROUND: Retained common bile duct (CBD) stones pose an occasional problem following ductal exploration, in spite of completion cholangiography or choledochoscopy. We present a method for treating retained stones in the Radiology Department by biliary lavage via a transcystic tube (TCT) or a T-tube, after intravenous administration of glucagon. METHODS: A TCT or T-tube is inserted following CBD exploration for multiple intrahepatic stones or when stones are fragmented to facilitate removal or flushing into the duodenum. A tube cholangiogram is performed on the 1st postoperative day. If any retained stones are encountered, 1 mg glucagon is administered intravenously and saline irrigation through the tube is done under fluoroscopic control, allowing the stone to pass to the duodenum. The cholangiogram is repeated 10-14 days later, before removing the tube. RESULTS: In case 1, transcystic CBD exploration was performed. Two stones were crushed and flushed into the duodenum. TCT cholangiography the following day. showed a 5-6-mm fragment causing complete obstruction. Following the use of glucagon and irrigation, the stone was observed passing into the duodenum, causing a brief mild episode of pain. In case 2, laparoscopic choledochotomy was performed to remove seven large stones. Completion choledochoscopy was satisfactory. T-tube cholangiography identified a small stone in the CBD, which was cleared with the help of glucagon. CONCLUSION: The current standard treatment for retained stones is endoscopic sphincterotomy. This is associated with morbidity, mortality, and significant additional cost. This new technique is a simple and safe alternative for retained CBD stones, most of which as small stones or fragments. Because glucagon causes intense relaxation of the sphincter of Oddi, the procedure should not take much longer than a routine tube cholangiogram. The safety of glucagon makes it possible to repeat the procedure if necessary.     

Experience with percutaneous transhepatic fiberoptic choledochoscopy for retained stones in the biliary tract

Summary Residual choledochal stones in 11 patients and stones in the intrahepatic bile ducts in 5 patients were successfully removed by the use of the fiberoptic choledochoscope (FCH-6T), introduced percutaneously into the intrahepatic biliary tract. The reasons for the use of percutaneous transhepatic extraction were: (1) unsuccessful endoscopic papillotomy; (2) unsuccessful choledochoscopic removal via the T-tube tract; (3) high surgical risk; (4) the presence of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for acute cholangitis and acute pancreatitis. All stones were extracted through the liver or the papilla of Vater after crushing them. All minor complications such as pain, vomiting, or fever resolved without further therapy. Percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopy proved safe and effective for the removal of retained choledochal stones and was essential for the treatment of stones in the intrahepatic bile ducts.     

Percutaneous extraction of retained common bile-duct stones via the T-tube track

A total of 86 procedures were performed in 58 patients referred in the postoperative period, for percutaneous stone extraction through the T-tube track. In 43 patients, the stone or stones were extrahepatic, intrahepatic in nine, and both intrahepatic and extrahepatic in six patients. Of the 58 patients with residual bile-duct stone(s), 48 (83%) were treated successfully by percutaneous removal, seven (12%) had an endoscopic sphincterotomy following unsuccessful T-tube track extraction, one (2%) had a re-operation and two (3%) remain with residual stones. No major complications occurred in this series. In contrast to endoscopic sphincterotomy, percutaneous T-tube extraction of retained bile-duct stones is associated with no mortality and low morbidity and is advocated as the procedure of choice in the presence of a T-tube.     

Efficacy of percutaneous treatment of biliary tract calculi using the holmium:YAG laser

Background Few Western studies have focused on percutaneous techniques using percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopy (PTHC) and holmium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet (YAG) laser to ablate biliary calculi in patients unable or unwilling to undergo endoscopic or surgical removal of the calculi. The authors report the efficacy of the holmium:YAG laser in clearing complex biliary calculi using percutaneous access techniques. Methods This study retrospectively reviewed 13 non-Asian patients with complex secondary biliary calculi treated percutaneously using holmium:YAG laser. Percutaneous access was accomplished via left, right, or bilateral hepatic ducts and upsized for passage of a 7-Fr video choledochoscope. Lithotripsy was performed under choledochoscopic vision using a holmium:YAG laser with 200- or 365-μm fibers generating 0.6 to 1.0 joules at 8 to 15 Hz. Patients underwent treatment until stone clearance was confirmed by PTHC. Downsizing and subsequent removal of percutaneous catheters completed the treatment course. Results Seven men and six women with an average age of 69 years underwent treatment. All the patients had their biliary tract stones cleared successfully. Of the 13 patients, 3 were treated solely as outpatients. The average length of percutaneous access was 108 days. At this writing, one patient still has a catheter in place. The average number of holmium:YAG laser treatments required for stone clearance was 1.6, with no patients requiring more than 3 treatments. Of the 13 patients, 8 underwent a single holmium:YAG laser treatment to clear their calculi. Prior unsuccessful attempts at endoscopic removal of the calculi had been experienced by 7 of the 13 patients. Five patients underwent percutaneous access and subsequent stone removal as their sole therapy for biliary stones. Five patients were cleared of their calculi after percutaneous laser ablation of large stones and percutaneous basket retrieval of the remaining stone fragments. There was one complication of pain requiring admission, and no deaths. Conclusions The use of PTHC with holmium:YAG laser ablation is safe and efficacious, but requires prolonged biliary access and often multiple procedures to ensure clearance of all calculi.     

The importance of postoperative choledochoscopy for management of retained biliarytract stones

From 1974-8, 808 postoperative choledochoscopy procedures, conducted by insertion of choledochofiberscope into the biliary tract through the sinus tract after the T-tube had been removed, were carried out in 292 patients at Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. In this series, 104 with retained biliary tract stones were encountered, and complete removal of stones was successfully carried out in 101, using postoperative choledochoscopy. Any failures of removal of retained biliary tract stones were attributed to improper insertion of the T-tube. The T-tube, of at least 18 French calibers should be inserted into the common bile duct at a right angle so as to obviate a tortuous sinus tract. The follow-up study in cases of complete extraction of the retained biliary tract stones showed that this approach is most effective. Recurrent stone with a silk nidus was found in one patient in whom postoperative choledochoscopy had been performed one year previously. Reoperation was carried out in this particular case. All other patients have remained asymptomatic. Finally, we advise routine use of postoperative choledochoscopy as an adjunct to the T-tube cholangiography, in order to prevent the possibility of retained biliary tract stones. Contents of this paper were read before the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Digestive Disease Week '79 on May 22nd, 1979 in New Orleans, U.S.A.     

Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) for the treatment of large retained common duct stones

Retained biliary stones may be too large for extraction through the existing T-tube tract. It may be necessary to dilate the tract, crush the stones or use endoscopic papillotomy. There are reports of stones and the extracting basket becoming stuck in the T-tube tract and tract ruptures caused by extracting large stones. In this study electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) is used in combination with T-tube tract choledochoscopy for the fragmentation of large stones prior to basket extraction. T-tube choledochoscopy was performed under IV sedation and sterile conditions no sooner than one month following common bile duct exploration. The Olympus 4.9-mm choledochoscope was passed through the T-tube tract to visualize the stone. A #5 Fr EHL probe was passed through the endoscope and advanced to within 1 mm of the surface of the stone. EHL discharge was started at a low energy level being increased until the spark discharges caused stone fragmentation. The resultant stone fragments were basket extracted under direct vision. The procedure was used in twelve patients with removal of all stones in eleven patients. Eight patients were treated with one endoscopic session. Because of multiple stones, two patients required two sessions and one patient four sessions. In one patient stone position prevented adequate fragmentation and endoscopic papillotomy also failed. Repeat choledochoscopy and EHL were successful. There were no complications of EHL or choledochoscopy in any of the patients. EHL was both effective and safe for fragmentation of large common duct stones when performed under direct vision using a choledochoscope.     

Postoperative T-tube tract choledochoscopy.

One hundred twenty-six patients underwent postoperative fiberoptic T-tube tract choledochoscopy for the management of retained biliary calculi as demonstrated by T-tube cholangiography. Extraction was successful in 94% of patients with retained stones. Thirty-nine patients had more than 1 stone, 20 patients had heptic duct stones, and 14 patients had large stones requiring electrohydraulic lithotripsy or laser fragmentation. Stone removal was not possible in six patients, secondary to either slippage of the T-tube with obliteration of the tract, inability to remove the stones with available instruments, a tortuous tract, or choledochoscope malfunction. Minor complications, most commonly transient fever, occurred in 12 patients. No serious complications or deaths occurred. The advantages of T-tube tract choledochoscopy include direct visualization of the biliary tree, avoidance of radiation exposure, and easy access to hepatic duct stones. This is the preferred method for treating retained biliary calculi in patients with a T-tube in situ.     

Endoscopic management of retained bile stones with an indwelling T-tube

Background Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is widely used for the treatment of residual bile duct stones in patients who had common bile duct (CBD) exploration and T-tube insertions. Methods In a 4-year period 45 patients were referred for endoscopic removal of residual bile duct stones. All patients had been operated 7–15 days earlier for choledocholithiasis and had a T-tube in the common bile duct (CBD). Results Four patients were excluded. Three patients had a periampullary carcinoma and the fourth patient had no residual stone seen at cholangiography. All patients had a successful ES, conventional in 34, precut-knife in 3, and with the rendezvous technique in 4 patients. In 24 patients, all having stones distal to the T-tube, complete clearance of the CBD was achieved during one session and the T-tube was removed after 48 h. In the remaining 17 patients (15 having stones proximal to the T-tube), the T-tube had to be removed first and following stone extraction, a plastic stent was inserted in the CBD. Complete bile duct clearance and stent removal was achieved in a second session 3–4 weeks later. There were no serious complications or biliary related symptoms after the procedures and after a mean follow-up period of 18 months. Conclusion The endoscopic technique is safe and efficient for the treatment of residual stones after CBD exploration with a T-tube insertion, offering immediate cure compared to the percutaneous techniques. It is also an ideal method for the diagnosis of periampullary carcinomas. Online publication: 24 August 2004     

Childhood recurrent pyogenic cholangitis

Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) is characterized by repeated attacks of bacterial infection of the biliary tract by enteric organisms resulting in formation of strictures and stones in the intrahepatic as well as the extrahepatic bile ducts. Between 1973 and 1984, we managed ten children with RPC. Presentation was acute, septicemia being invariably present. Four children responded to vigorous intravenous (IV) fluid and antibiotic therapy; of these, three subsequently required elective transduodenal sphincteroplasty. Six children required emergency biliary tract decompression surgically and three of them also had concomitant definitive drainage procedures (transduodenal sphincteroplasty, two; supraduodenal choledochoduodenostomy, one). The other three had T-tube drainage initially followed by elective drainage procedures (transduodenal sphincteroplasty, one; supraduodenal choledochoduodenostomy, two). At exploration, pigment stones and/or mud were invariably present in the bile ducts. One child required reexploration for hemostasis following sphincteroplasty, and one child died from septicemia and respiratory failure following operation. The rest are well, having been followed for 3 to 12 years. Major advances in recent years include (1) endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for accurate definition of the biliary tract and confirmation of the presence and location of stones during the quiescent phase, (2) the intraoperative choledochoscopic extraction of intrahepatic and extrahepatic stones, and (3) postoperative stone removal via the T-tube tract.     

Percutaneous removal of caliceal and other "inaccessible" stones: instruments and techniques

Percutaneous removal of renal stones is becoming an established procedure, especially for stones lying free in the renal pelvis. However, some renal stones, particularly caliceal stones, are less accessible and require special techniques for removal. We discuss these techniques, which include 1) retrograde pyelography to facilitate a thorough understanding of caliceal anatomy and stone position in 3 dimensions, 2) approaches for accurate placement of a nephrostomy tract for straight-line access to the stone(s), 3) judicious use of percutaneous punctures above the 12th rib and secondary percutaneous tracts, and 4) skilled choice and use of a large variety of cutting, extracting and disintegrating instruments with endoscopic and/or fluoroscopic control. The flexible nephroscope is valuable especially to reach inaccessible areas, although its skilled use requires experience. Flexible endoscopy often is aided by pressure irrigation, an assistant and simultaneous fluoroscopic control.     

Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To establish a simple, reproducible, and safe technique of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (CBDE) with high clearance rates and low morbidity and mortality rates. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: For most general surgeons, laparoscopic CBDE appears an unduly complex and demanding procedure. Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, many surgeons use endoscopic cholangiography (ERC) and endoscopic sphincterotomy as their only option in treating bile duct stones. ERC is more specific if used after surgery, but it carries an appreciable morbidity rate and has the disadvantage of requiring a second procedure to deal with bile duct stones. To this end, various methods of laparoscopic CBDE have been developed. METHODS: Between August 1991 and February 1997, 300 consecutive unselected patients underwent laparoscopic CBDE. RESULTS: Of 300 laparoscopic CBDE procedures, 173 (58%) were managed using a transcystic approach and 127 (42%) with choledochotomy. Successful laparoscopic stone clearance was achieved in 271 (90%). Of the 29 (10%) patients not cleared laparoscopically, 10 had an elective postsurgical ERC, 12 were converted to an open procedure early in the series, and 7 had unexpected retained stones. There was one death (mortality rate 0.3%) and major morbidity occurred in 22 patients (7%). The last 100 procedures were performed from July 1995 to February 1997, and stone clearance was unsuccessful in only two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic transcystic basket extraction of common duct stones under fluoroscopic guidance is a relatively quick, successful, and safe technique. Choledochotomy, when required, is associated with a higher morbidity rate, particularly with T-tube insertion, and the authors advocate primary bile duct closure with or without insertion of a biliary stent as a more satisfactory technique for both surgeon and patient. Most patients with gallbladder and common duct calculi should expect a curative one-stage laparoscopic procedure without the need for external biliary drainage or ERC.     

胆道镜联合钬激光经T管窦道治疗肝内外胆管残余结石

目的:探讨胆道镜联合钬激光经T管窦道碎石治疗肝内、外胆管残余结石的临床价值和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2010年2月—2011年6月经术后T管窦道置入胆道镜联合钬激光碎石治疗300例肝内、外胆管残余结石患者的临床资料。结果:292例经胆道镜下钬激光碎石治疗结石全部取净,碎石时间4~12 min,碎石次数1~5次,13例经5次碎石;8例患者结石位于III,IV级肝管碎石未成功,带管2个月后经等离子体冲击波碎石,6例患者成功取出结石,2例患者结石未取出。碎石总数568枚,结石排净率97.3%(292/300)。术中无胆道大出血、穿孔、胆管壁灼伤、胆瘘等严重并发症发生;15例术后出现低热。268例随访6~18个月,平均10个月,未发现结石复发及残留,无胆道狭窄。结论:胆道镜联合钬激光碎石可显著提高肝内、外胆管残余结石的治疗效果,是一种简便、安全、有效的方法,值得临床应用推广。     

经皮肝穿刺一期硬镜碎石术在治疗肝胆管结石的应用

目的：探讨经皮肝穿刺一期硬质胆镜碎石术对肝胆管结石的治疗效果。 方法：对65例肝胆管结石患者的肝胆管通过B超定位进行直接穿刺建立窦道，扩张窦道直径至16~18 F后，采用硬质胆道镜取出肝胆管结石。 结果：一次性扩张取尽结石患者达60例；2例由于右肝胆管与胆总管之间的角度<90°而放弃；术后因胆管出血行介入栓塞治疗3例；39例存在胆管狭窄（60.0%），均根据具体情况同时行相应处理。对所有治疗的患者进行26个月随访，肝胆管结石的复发率为7.7%（5/65）。 结论：经皮肝穿刺一期硬质胆镜碎石术治疗肝胆管结石安全、有效，其清除率结石的同时处理胆管狭窄可利于结石复发率降低，是一种避免传统手术治疗的可取方法。

     

Endoscopic diagnosis and management of complications following surgery for gallstones

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is increasingly being performed for therapeutic purposes. This report reviews our experience in an attempt to determine the role and efficacy of ERCP in the management of postoperative complications following surgery for gallstones. Methods: This study analyzes ERCP records of 418 patients performed in a single referral center after a surgery for gallstones, in the period from December 1991 to June 2000. Results: A total of 451 endoscopic procedures were performed for 418 patients. The primary operations which required ERCP and were included in the study were laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 161, 38.5%), choledocholithotomy and T-tube drainage (n = 157, 37.5%), open cholecystectomy (n = 82, 19.6%), choledochoduodenostomy (n = 14, 3.3%), and cholecystostomy (n = 4, 1%). Procedure was carried out successfully in 403 patients (96.4%), whereas a proper endoscopic diagnosis was not achieved in 15 (3.5%). Retained biliary stones (without any associated abnormality) were found in 163 (38.9%), ductal injuries in 44 (10.5%), biliary strictures in 21 (5.0%), papillary stenosis in 36 (8.6%), cystic stump leak (with or without retained stones) in 30 (7.1%), leak from T-tube tract (with/or without retained stones) in 20 (4.8%), and unsuspected malignancies in 18 (4.3%). A sole diagnostic cholangiography was obtained in 63 patients (15.0%). Patients were managed by debris or stone extraction in 169 (40.4%), endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in 145 patients (34.6%), stent insertion in 19 (4.5%), or dilatation in 2 (0.4%). Overall successful stone removal rate was 97.4%. Thirty-nine patients with normal cholangiographic findings underwent ES for the relief of presenting signs and symptoms. ERCP-related morbidity was 13.6%. Conclusions: The need for ERCP is rising, especially for stones retained after cholecystectomies. Endoscopy offers safe and effective methods in the treatment of bile leaks, unless associated with major ductal injuries. ES is a reasonable method for treating papillary stenosis and some post-cholecystectomy pain or symptoms.     

Nonoperative extraction of retained common duct stones.

Nonoperative extraction of retained common duct stones was successful in 17 patients during the past two years. Eleven required only one manipulation; the largest number of manipulations required was five. The Burhenne catheter and Dormia basket were employed frequently, but were not always effective. When difficulties occurred with their use, Mazzariello biliary forceps resulted in successful stone extraction, particularly in the management of impacted stones. Extraction procedures were performed under fluoroscopic control, usually on an outpatient basis. Recently, we have employed a flexible fiberoptic endoscope that allows visual investigation of suspected defects and decreases fluoroscopic exposure. These results indicate that all patients with retained common duct stones are candidates for sinus tract manipulation six weeks after common duct exploration. It is recommended that secondary operations for retained common duct calculi not be performed until nonoperative extraction has been given an appropriate trial.     

Delayed cholangitis resulting from a retained T-tube fragment encased within a stone: a rare complication

Inserting a T-tube after choledochotomy for the removal of bile duct stones remains a time-honored practice. Biliary drainage after bile duct exploration has some advantages. It minimizes bile leakage, provides access for cholangiography, and removes occasional retained stones. The use of T-tubes also has been associated with significant complications. Biliary sepsis, bile duct trauma during removal, bile leakage leading to peritonitis, retention of a fragment, stricture formation after removal have been reported. We report an unusual case of cholangitis caused by a T-tube fragment within a large stone, occurring 11 years after bile duct exploration. A 39-year-old woman underwent common bile duct exploration with insertion of a T-tube. Cholangiography was normal, but as the T-tube was removed, its horizontal limb was missing. The patient failed to present for endoscopic removal a few weeks after surgery Five years later, she presented with recurrent biliary pains and a mild episode of cholangitis. This last episode was associated with severe pain and jaundice. After initial conservative treatment, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed, and endoscopic removal of the fragment and stone material was successful. Despite the declining numbers of bile duct explorations in the laparoscopic era and the tendency to use transcystic drainage or primary closure of a choledochotomy, the T-tube will continue to be a useful tool in biliary surgery, subject to consideration of the indications and the available alternatives. The reported case highlights the importance of careful tube preparation to prevent partial separation at removal, and early removal of a missing fragment to avoid potential serious complications.     

Nonsurgical treatment of common-bile-duct stones

Exploration of the common bile duct, the traditional treatment for choledocholithiasis, can often be replaced by nonsurgical procedures. Since 1976, 147 patients have been treated nonsurgically with an overall success rate of 84%. Three groups are reported. In group 1, 80 patients had stone extraction under radiologic control through the T-tube tract alone. Stones were successfully removed from the common bile duct in 52 of 59 patients and from the intrahepatic ducts in 12 of 21 patients. The overall success rate of extraction through the T tube was 80%. Group 2 comprised 58 patients who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction only with 86% success. The nine patients in group 3 required a combination of radiologic and endoscopic intervention. Six had stones "pushed" by the radiologist through a previously sphincterotomized ampulla of Vater and in two the radiologist introduced stone crushers transhepatically into the common duct to break up large stones to a size capable of passing through the sphincterotomy site (100% success). One elderly patient had a cholecystostomy under local anesthesia for suppurative cholecystitis, and subsequently multiple common-bile-duct stones were removed by the radiologist through the gallbladder and cystic duct and by the endoscopist through the endoscopic sphincterotomy site. All procedures were carried out under local anesthesia, and most required a hospital stay of 1 day or less. Complications were minimal and there were no deaths. T-tube extraction and endoscopic sphincterotomy are effective, relatively safe, nonsurgical procedures for the removal of common-duct stones.     

Radiologic methods of bile duct stone extraction

Fluoroscopically guided extraction of retained common duct calculi through a T-tube tract has a high success rate, low complication rate, and negligible mortality rate. It is not unduly uncomfortable and can be performed on an outpatient basis. The only disadvantage is a wait of approximately 6 weeks after surgery to let the T-tube sinus tract mature. If no T tube is present, endoscopic sphincterotomy is usually the treatment of choice. In difficult cases, the radiologist may be able to assist the endoscopist by placing a wire across the sphincter through a percutaneous transhepatic route. If endoscopic sphincterotomy is not successful or feasible, an attempt at percutaneous stone removal can be made from a transhepatic approach. A variety of new devices and dissolution agents is becoming available for stone fragmentation or reduction.     

Management of complex biliary tract calculi with a holmium laser

The difficulty in managing complex biliary tract calculi is exemplified in patients with primary intrahepatic calculi. Standard surgical and endoscopic approaches often fail to clear calculi in these patients who have recurrent episodes of cholangitis. The success of the holmium laser for urologic calculi led us to adapt treatment strategies for primary and secondary biliary tract calculi where standard treatments had been unsuccessful. Our goals were to remove all calculi, prevent recurrent sepsis, and preserve hepatic parenchyma. Thirty-six patients with complex biliary calculi were treated. After sepsis was controlled and the extent of calculi was evaluated, appropriate access to and drainage of the biliary tract was achieved. Holmium laser lithotripsy was performed under video guidance using flexible choledochoscopes and a 200 μ laser fiber generating 0.6 to 1.0 joules at frequencies of 6 to 10 Hz. Lithotripsy procedures were repeated until cholangiography and cholangioscopy confirmed the clearance of calculi. Twenty-two patients of Asian descent with primary intrahepatic calculi and 14 patients with secondary intrahepatic calculi were treated. Access to the biliary tract could be accomplished through percutaneous catheter tracts, T-tube tracts, or the cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Biliary drainage was by biliary enteric anastomosis or endoscopic sphincterotomy. Complete stone clearance required an average of 3.9 procedures (range 1 to 15) for patients with primary intrahepatic calculi and 2.6 procedures (range 1 to 10) for patients with secondary intrahepatic calculi regardless of stone composition. No patient required hepatic resection and no complications or deaths were attributed to the holmium laser. Clearance of calculi can reliably and safely be achieved with a holmium laser regardless of stone composition or location while preserving hepatic parenchyma and preventing recurrent sepsis. Presented at the Fourth Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Congress, Miami Beach, Florida, February 27-March 2, 2003.     

胆道镜治疗术后肝内胆管结石并狭窄13年经验总结：附697例报告

目的:总结胆道镜治疗术后肝内胆管结石并狭窄的经验,提高肝内胆管结石并狭窄的治疗效果。方法:回顾2000年1月—2012年12月应用胆道镜经T管窦道治疗术后肝内胆管结石并狭窄的697例患者临床资料,分析技术要点,评价疗效。结果:672例患者取净结石,结石取净率96.4%。胆道镜共发现1 306支肝内胆管狭窄,其中1 297支狭窄得到解除,狭窄解除率99.3%。狭窄解除、结石取净后患者胆管壁恢复光滑。9例患者出现严重并发症,均经治疗后痊愈。结论:规范的胆道镜治疗能有效解除术后肝内胆管狭窄,取净结石;肝内胆管狭窄的发现及处理是胆道镜治疗的优势,应根据不同狭窄类型分别对待;萎缩肝段切除和术中取石在肝内胆管结石治疗中仍具有重要作用。