Incidence of erectile dysfunction in men 40 to 69 years old: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts male aging study

PURPOSE: We estimated the incidence of erectile dysfunction in men 40 to 69 years old at study entry during an average 8.8-year followup, and determined how risk varied with age, socioeconomic status and medical conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from a randomly sampled population based longitudinal study of Massachusetts men were analyzed. A total of 1,709 men completed the baseline interview during 1987 to 1989 and 1,156 survivors completed followup from 1995 to 1997. The analysis sample consisted of 847 men without erectile dysfunction at baseline and with complete followup information. Erectile dysfunction was assessed by discriminant analysis of 13 questions from a self-administered sexual function questionnaire and a single global self-rating question. RESULTS: The crude incidence rate for erectile dysfunction was 25.9 cases per 1,000 man-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.5 to 29.9). The annual incidence rate increased with each decade of age and was 12.4 cases per 1,000 man-years (95% CI 9.0 to 16.9), 29.8 (24.0 to 37.0) and 46.4 (36.9 to 58.4) for men 40 to 49, 50 to 59 and 60 to 69 years old, respectively. The age adjusted risk of erectile dysfunction was higher for men with lower education, diabetes, heart disease and hypertension. Population projections for men 40 to 69 years old suggest that 17,781 new cases of erectile dysfunction in Massachusetts and 617,715 in the United States (white males only) are expected annually. CONCLUSIONS: Although prevalence estimates and cross-sectional correlates of erectile dysfunction have recently been established, incidence estimates were lacking. Incidence is necessary to assess risk, and plan treatment and prevention strategies. The risk of erectile dysfunction was about 26 cases per 1,000 men annually, and increased with age, lower education, diabetes, heart disease and hypertension.     

A prospective study of risk factors for erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: We examined the impact of obesity, physical activity, alcohol use and smoking on the development of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects included 22,086 United States men 40 to 75 years old in the Health Professionals Followup Study cohort who were asked to rate their erectile function for multiple periods on a questionnaire mailed in 2000. Men who reported good or very good erectile function and no major chronic disease before 1986 were included in the analyses. RESULTS: Of men who were healthy and had good or very good erectile function before 1986, 17.7% reported incident erectile dysfunction during the 14-year followup. Obesity (multivariate relative risk 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.2 compared to men of ideal weight in 1986) and smoking (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.7) in 1986 were associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction, while physical activity (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.7-0.8 comparing highest to lowest quintile of physical activity) was associated with a decreased risk of erectile dysfunction. For men in whom prostate cancer developed during followup, smoking (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.9) was the only lifestyle factor associated with erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the risk of erectile dysfunction may be a useful and to this point unexploited motivation for men to engage in health promoting behaviors. We found that obesity and smoking were positively associated, and physical activity was inversely associated with the risk of erectile dysfunction developing.     

Frequency and determinants of erectile dysfunction in Italy

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction (ED) in Italy in a cross-sectional study. METHODS: Eligible for the study were men aged 18 years or more, randomly identified by 143 general practitioners among their registered patients during the period January 1996 to February 1997. ED was defined as the impossibility to achieve and maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance. RESULTS: Of the 2, 010 men interviewed, 257 (12.8%) reported ED. The prevalence increased with age, from 2% in men aged 18-39 to 48% in those >70 years (tested for trend, p = 0.0001). A history of cardiopathy, diabetes, hypertension, neuropathy, thrombotic/hemorrhagic stroke, peripheral vascular disorders, pelvic/medullary injury and pelvic surgery/radiation all increased the risk of ED. The association of hypertension and diabetes tends to increase the risk of ED. In comparison with nondiabetic and nonhypertensive men, the odds ratio (OR) was 1.4 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.7-3.2) for hypertensive men without diabetes, 4.6 (95% CI, 1.6-13.7) for diabetic men without hypertension and 8.1 (95% CI, 1.2-55.0) for men with diabetes and hypertension. In comparison with never smokers, the OR of ED was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.2-2.4) for current smokers and 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.3) for ex-smokers and increased with duration of the habit. CONCLUSIONS: The study offers a quantitative estimate of the prevalence of ED and of its main risk factors in Italian men.     

The association of smoking and erectile dysfunction: results from the Fangchenggang Area Male Health and Examination Survey (FAMHES)

To describe the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) and its association with smoking and other risk factors among a large male population. Data were collected from 2686 men attending the Fangchenggang Area Male Health and Examination Survey from September 2009 to December 2009. ED was assessed using the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function. Self-reported smoking history was obtained from the questionnaire. Prevalence of ED was 49.5% among 2686 Chinese men in Fangchenggang aged 20-79 years. After adjusting for age, alcohol drinking, physical activity, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity, smokers who smoked ≥20 cigarettes daily had a significantly increased risk of ED than never smokers (odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.49; P = .02). After further adjustment for education, the risk of ED was still significantly higher in men smoking more than 23 years than never smokers (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.22-2.09; P = .001). Association of age and education with ED was statistically significant after adjusting for the other variables. A history of diabetes and hypertension all increased the risk of ED, but statistically significant differences did not exist after adjustment for other variables. The association between smoking and ED risk in men was higher with a habit of drinking alcohol (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.01-1.74) or physical inactivity (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.05-1.67), or with a with a history of hypertension (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.11-2.62), dyslipidemia (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.06-1.81), and diabetes (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.4-6.98). Our results show that heavy smoking might cause ED and that the duration of the habit increases the risk of ED. Furthermore, it highlights the potential interaction of smoking with other life habits or medical history on ED risk.     

Bidirectional relationship between depression and erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: We specified the interrelationship between depressive mood and erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The target population consisted of men who were 50, 60 or 70 years old and residing in the study area in Finland in 1994. Questionnaires were mailed to 3,143 men in 1994 and to 2,837 men 5 years later. The followup sample consisted of 1,683 men who responded to the baseline and followup questionnaires. RESULTS: Erectile dysfunction was strongly associated with untreated and treated depressive symptoms. The prevalence OR adjusted for potential confounders was 2.6 (95% CI 1.8-3.8) for untreated and 3.3 (95% CI 1.6-7.1) for treated depressive symptoms at the beginning of followup. The incidence of erectile dysfunction was 59/1,000 person-years (95% CI 39-90) in men with depressive mood and 37/1,000 person-years (95% CI 32-43) in those free of the disorder. Compared with men free of depressive symptoms who did not use medication for psychological disorders at study entry the adjusted incidence density ratio of erectile dysfunction was 4.5 (95% CI 2.2-9.2) in men with treated depressive symptoms and 1.2 (0.7-2.1) in those with untreated depressive symptoms. The incidence of depressive mood was 20/1,000 person-years in men with erectile dysfunction and 11/1,000 person-years in those free of erectile dysfunction. The adjusted incidence density ratio of depressive mood was 1.9 (95% CI 1.1-3.3) in men with erectile dysfunction compared with those free of it at entry. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate or severe depressive mood or antidepressant medication use may cause erectile dysfunction and erectile dysfunction independently may cause or exacerbate depressive mood.     

Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in a population-based study in Iran

To explore the prevalence of and risk factors for erectile dysfunction (ED) in Iran. A total of 2674 men aged 20-70 y old were interviewed by 42 general practitioners and answered a self-administered questionnaire. The subjects were randomly identified from 28 counties of Iran. ED was defined as difficulties in achieving an erection before sexual intercourse and maintaining it. Data on medical history, toxic habits, and current use of medications were also obtained. Of the men interviewed, 18.8% (460) reported ED. Impotence was found to be significantly associated with age and was less associated with geographical location. The prevalence increased with age, from 6% in men 20-39 y to 47% in those >60 y (tested for trend < or = 0.001). A history of diabetes (odds ratio (OR) 3.72, 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.51-5.71), hypertension (OR 1.69, 95% CI, 1.31-2.40), peripheral vascular disorders (OR 2.44, 95% CI, 1.65-3.74), hypercholesterolemia (OR 1.71, 95% CI, 1.11-2.65), and coronary artery disease (OR 1.61, 95% CI, 1.21-2.85) were significantly associated with ED. In comparison with never smokers, the OR of ED was 2.41 (95% CI, 1.52-3.30) for current smokers and 2.15 (95% CI, 1.38-3.1) for ex-smokers and increased with duration of the habit. Drug intake, called tranquilizers and antidepressants, correlated strongly (OR 3.71, 95% CI, 2.51-6.76 and OR 2.80, 95% CI, 1.47-4.32, respectively). This study provides a quantitative estimate of the prevalence and main risk factors for ED in Iranian men.     

Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in 2869 men using a validated questionnaire

PURPOSE: To assess prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction (ED) by using the International Index of Erectile Function- 5 (IIEF-5) in men undergoing a health investigation. METHODS: Men aged 20-80 years participating in a health-screening project in the area of Vienna completed the IIEF-5 for evaluation of ED. In parallel, all men underwent a detailed health examination including physical assessment, evaluation of various life-style factors, medical history and a blood analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2869 men were analysed. According to the IIEF-5 score, 32.2% reported on any degree of ED (IIEF-5 score <22), 23.7% had mild ED (IIEF-5 score 17-21), 5.0% mild to moderate ED (IIEF-5 score 12-16), 2.2% moderate ED (IIEF-5 score 8-11) and 1.3% severe ED (IIEF-5 score 5-7). The proportion of men with ED remained stable from 20 to 50 years (26-29%) and increased thereafter to 37.5% (51-60 years) and to 71.2% in those 71-80 years of age. Severe ED (IIEF-5 score 5-7) increased from 0.4% (20-30 years) to 0.5% (41-50 years), 1.3% (51-60 years) and to 9.6% in those aged 71-80 years. Risk factors for ED were age, diabetes (OR: 3.0; 95%CI: 1.53-5.87), hyperlipidemia (OR: 2.29; 95%CI: 1.42-3.7), lower urinary tract symptoms (OR: 2.2; 95%CI: 1.76-2.76), hypertension (OR: 2.05; 95%CI: 1.61-2.6), psychological stress (OR: 1.68; 95%CI: 1.43-1.98) and low physical activity (OR: 1.35; 95%CI: 1.15-1.6) (all, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Overall, 32.2% of men in our study had ED according to the IIEF-5. Apart from age, most important risk factors for ED were diabetes, hyperlipidemia, lower urinary tract symptoms, hypertension and psychological stress.     

Determinants of erectile dysfunction risk in a large series of Italian men attending andrology clinics

OBJECTIVE: To assess determinants of ED in men who asked for a free of charge andrologic consultation during a week focused on andrologic prevention in Italy. METHODS: Men were invited to attend 178 participating andrology centers for a free of charge visit for counselling about urologic or andrologic conditions. Data were recorded with a simple questionnaire used by all centers. RESULTS: 2499 (19.9%) were diagnosed having ED. The frequency of ED increased with age, ranging from 4.6% in men under 25 years, to 37.6% in men over 74. In comparison with men with primary education the OR of ED was 0.8 (95% CI 0.7-0.9) in men with secondary education and 0.7 (95% CI 0.6-0.9) in those with university degree. After adjusting for age, the risk of ED was significantly higher in men consuming more than 3 glasses/day of alcoholic drinking (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-2.0), in subjects smoking more than 10 cigarettes/day (OR 1.2, CI 95% 1.1-1.4) and in former smokers (OR 1.2, CI 95% 1.1-1.4). Men performing at least two hours per week of physical activity had a decreased risk of ED (OR 0.8, CI 95% 0.7-0.9). We found an increased risk of ED in men with diabetes (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4), hypertension (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.4), cardiopathy (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.8) and hypercholesterolemia (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.6). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides further data on determinants of ED risk in a large data set and underlines the relationship between ED and cardiovascular diseases.     

Erectile dysfunction--an observable marker of diabetes mellitus? A large national epidemiological study

PURPOSE: We examined whether men with erectile dysfunction are more likely to have diabetes mellitus than men without erectile dysfunction, and whether erectile dysfunction can be used as an observable early marker of diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a nationally representative managed care claims database from 51 health plans and 28 million members in the United States, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare the prevalence rates of diabetes mellitus between men with erectile dysfunction (285,436) and men without erectile dysfunction (1,584,230) during 1995 to 2001. Logistic regression models were used to isolate the effect of erectile dysfunction on the likelihood of having diabetes mellitus with adjustment for age, region and 7 concurrent diseases. RESULTS: The diabetes mellitus prevalence rates were 20.0% in men with erectile dysfunction and 7.5% in men without erectile dysfunction. With adjustment for age, region and concurrent diseases, the odds ratio of having diabetes mellitus between men with erectile dysfunction and without erectile dysfunction was 1.60 (p <0.0001). With adjustment for regions and concurrent diseases, the age specific odds ratios ranged from 2.94 (p <0.0001, age 26 to 35) to 1.05 (p = 0.1717, age 76 to 85). CONCLUSIONS: Men with erectile dysfunction were more than twice as likely to have diabetes mellitus as men without erectile dysfunction. Erectile dysfunction is an observable marker of diabetes mellitus, strongly so for men 45 years old or younger and likely for men 46 to 65 years old, but it is not a marker for men older than 66 years.     

Environmental agents and erectile dysfunction: a study in a consulting population

We evaluated chemical and physical environmental agents as risk factors for erectile dysfunction among a consulting population. We studied 199 men who sought medical help for erectile disorders between 1996 and 1998 in 3 andrology units in the Litoral Sur region of Argentina. Patients were evaluated by monitoring nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity, and were classified as having normal (n = 26), irregular (dissociation, short episode or low amplitude, n = 146), or flat erectile pattern (n = 26). Exposure to environmental agents was assessed by a detailed interview, and 4 groups were constituted: nonexposed, pesticide-exposed, solvent-exposed, and heat-exposed. A multivariate polytomous logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for association between quality of nocturnal erections and exposure groups adjusted for confounding factors. Exposure to environmental agents was a risk factor for a flat erectile pattern (OR 7.1, 95% CI 1.5-33.0 for pesticides; OR 12.2, 95% CI 1.2-124.8 for solvents; and OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.3-9.4 for heat). Associations were much weaker for an irregular erectile pattern (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.5-6.7 for pesticides; OR 2.1, 95% CI 0.3-17.9 for solvents; and OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.4-4.0 for heat). Our results suggest that environmental agents constitute a risk factor for erectile dysfunction by interfering with erectile ability.     

Effect of erectile dysfunction on frequency of intercourse: a population based prevalence study in Finland

PURPOSE: We estimate the prevalence of erectile dysfunction in Finland and its effect on frequency of sexual intercourse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population based study of 3,143, 50, 60 and 70-year-old men in Tampere and 11 municipalities in the same county was conducted by mailed questionnaire. The definition of erectile dysfunction was based on difficulties in achieving an erection before sexual intercourse and maintaining it. Erectile dysfunction was classified into 4 groups as none, minimal, moderate and complete. To estimate the effect of erectile dysfunction on the frequency of sexual intercourse the men were divided into those who had intercourse at least an average of once weekly and those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 2,198 questionnaires (70%) were returned and 1, 983 men (63%) were included in the study. Of these men 26% had no, 48% minimal, 14% and 12% complete erectile dysfunction, which increased with age (compared with 50-year-old men, the odds ratios for complete erectile dysfunction were 4.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-7.5) for 60 and 21 (95% CI 12.5 to 34.7) to 70-year-old men. The effect of erectile dysfunction on the frequency of sexual intercourse could not be accounted for by age or marital status. The adjusted effect was strong among men with moderate (odds ratio 3.5, 95% CI 2.2-5.1) and complete (173, 68-443) erectile dysfunction but minimal erectile dysfunction had no impact (odds ratio 0.9, 95% CI 0. 6-1.3) on the frequency of intercourse. CONCLUSIONS: Erectile difficulties are common and complete erectile dysfunction increases with age. Erectile dysfunction regulates the sex life of men with moderate or complete dysfunction but this association cannot be accounted for by age or marital status. Although mild erectile dysfunction did not completely regulate sex life, its significance is the risk of progression to a more severe sexual life disturbing dysfunction.     

Prevalence of erectile dysfunction and associated factors among men without concomitant diseases: a population study

We interviewed a population sample of 2412 men aged 40-70 y in Brazil, Italy, Japan and Malaysia about medical history, lifestyle habits and sexual behavior. Men were classified as having moderate or complete erectile dysfunction (ED) if they reported to be sometimes or never able to achieve and maintain an erection satisfactory for sexual intercourse, respectively. There were 1335 men with no diagnosis of cardiovascular or prostate diseases, diabetes, ulcer or depression, nor taking hormones. The prevalence of ED was 16.1%. ED was associated with age (the risk increased 8% per y), moderate (odds ratio (OR)=2.2) or severe (OR=4.9) lower urinary tract symptoms and smoking (OR=2.3 for >30 cigarettes/day). It was inversely associated with physical activity (OR=0.5) and higher educational levels. Between the ages of 40 and 70 y, almost one in six 'healthy' men is affected by ED. Further research should look at preclinical disease stages and genetic factors.     

Erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: Male sexual health has taken on increased importance as the United States population ages, develops coexisting medical conditions and undergoes interventions that can affect sexual function. We characterized the burden and severity of disease, treatment patterns and economic consequences of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analytical methods used to generate these results were described previously. RESULTS: Erectile dysfunction was self-reported by almost 1 of 5 men and it increased with age. Erectile dysfunction may have been more commonly reported in Hispanic men and in those with a history of diabetes, obesity, smoking and hypertension. In most databases black American men had rates of use for office visits and inpatient hospital care that were twice those of other racial groups, although these rates were not controlled for comorbid conditions or other regional and socioeconomic factors. The use of diagnostic tests markedly decreased, while pharmacological therapy, especially with oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, markedly increased. Penile implant surgery continued to be performed with most patients electing inflatable devices. Extrapolating from the population based estimates of erectile dysfunction prevalence and current use trends showed that the cost of treatment nationwide could reach $15 billion if all men sought treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of disease due to erectile dysfunction in the United States will increase with the aging of the male population, increasing prevalence of comorbid conditions, expanded treatment seeking behavior and costs of pharmaceutical therapy. Accurate estimates of economic cost will require better understanding of pathogenesis, treatment seeking behavior, patient preference for therapies, success of treatments and relative satisfaction with oral pharmacotherapy and penile implants.     

Cardiovascular drug use and the incidence of erectile dysfunction

It is unclear whether high blood pressure per se or antihypertensive drug use causes erectile dysfunction (ED). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of cardiovascular diseases and their concomitant medications use on the incidence of ED. The target population consisted of men aged 55, 65 or 75 years old residing in the study area in Finland in 1999. Questionnaires were mailed to 2837 men in 1999 and to 2510 of them 5 years later. The follow-up sample consisted of 1665 men (66% of those eligible) who responded to both baseline and follow-up questionnaires. Men free of moderate or severe ED at baseline (N=1000) were included in the study. ED was assessed by two questions on subject ability to achieve or maintain an erection sufficient for intercourse. Poisson regression model was used in the multivariable analyses. The risk of ED was higher in men suffering from treated hypertension or heart disease than in those with the untreated condition. The risk of ED was higher in men using calcium channel inhibitor (adjusted relative risk (RR)=1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-2.4), angiotensin II antagonist (RR=2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.7), non-selective beta-blocker (RR=1.7, 95% CI 0.9-3.2) or diuretic (RR=1.3, CI 0.7-2.4) compared with non-users. ED was not associated with using organic nitrates, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, selective beta-blockers and serum lipid-lowering agents. In summary, calcium channel inhibitors, angiotensin II antagonists, non-selective beta-blockers and diuretics may increase the risk of ED.     

The association between benign prostatic hyperplasia and chronic kidney disease in community-dwelling men

BACKGROUND: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and chronic kidney disease are important public health problems in older men. Previous referral-based studies disagree on whether BPH is associated with chronic kidney disease. The objective of this study was to determine the community-based association between clinical measures of BPH and chronic kidney disease. METHODS: A community-based sample of 2115 white men (ages 40-79 years) was randomly selected from the Olmsted County, Minnesota population (55% participation rate) in 1990. A random subsample (N= 476) had a detailed clinical evaluation. This evaluation included a questionnaire with similar queries to the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), peak urinary flow rates (uroflowmeter), postvoid residual urine volume (ultrasound), prostate volume (ultrasound), serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), and serum creatinine. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, hypertension, diabetes, leukocyte esterase positive (possible urinary tract infection), and smoking, chronic kidney disease [serum creatinine > or =133 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL)] was associated with diminished peak urinary flow rate (<15 mL/sec) by an odds ratio (OR) = 2.96 (95% CI 1.30-7.01), moderate-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (IPSS >7) by an OR = 2.91 (95% CI 1.32-6.62), and chronic urinary retention (postvoid residual >100 mL) by an OR = 2.28 (95% CI 0.66-6.68). There was no association with a prostate volume >30 mL by an OR = 0.56 (95% CI 0.22-1.37) or PSA >1.4 ng/mL by an OR = 1.17 (95% CI 0.47-2.81). CONCLUSION: There was a cross-sectional association between signs and symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction and chronic kidney disease in community-dwelling men. Prostatic enlargement was not associated with chronic kidney disease.     

Erectile dysfunction and hypertension

Recent analyses suggest that about 67-68% of men with hypertension have some degree of erectile dysfunction (ED). With about 25 million men in the US with hypertension, substantial numbers of hypertension-related ED exist that tend to be of a more severe nature than the general population. Men with ED are also more likely to have hypertension. Thiazide diuretic and beta-blocker therapy may contribute to ED. Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors are effective therapy in men with ED owing to hypertension who are taking antihypertensive medicines including those on multiple antihypertensive medicines. The addition of PDE5 inhibitors to usual common antihypertensive medicines (diuretics, beta blockers, calcium blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers) results in either no or small additive reductions in blood pressure (BP) and no increase in serious clinical adverse events. There are however precautions regarding the use of PDE5 inhibitors in patients taking alpha blockers for either hypertension or benign prostatic hypertrophy, as some patients may develop orthostatic hypotension. Organic nitrates remain an absolute contraindication for PDE5 inhibitors because synergistic and symptomatic reductions in BP may occur in some patients with this drug combination.     

Are men with erectile dysfunction more likely to have hypertension than men without erectile dysfunction? A naturalistic national cohort study

PURPOSE:: We examined whether men with erectile dysfunction (ED) are more likely to have hypertension than men without ED in a managed care setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: We used a naturalistic cohort design to compare hypertension prevalence rates in 285,436 men with ED to that in 1,584,230 men without ED from 1995 through 2001. We also used a logistic regression model to isolate the effect of ED on the likelihood of hypertension after controlling for subject age, census regions and 9 concurrent diseases. The ED and the nonED cohort came from a nationally representative, managed care claims database that covers 51 health plans and 28 million members in the United States. Finally, the prevalence rate difference between members with and without ED, and the OR of having hypertension were calculated. RESULTS:: The hypertension prevalence rate was 41.2% in men with ED and 19.2% in men without ED. After controlling for subject age, census region and 9 concurrent diseases the OR was 1.383 (p <0.0001), which implies that the odds for men with ED to have hypertension were 38.3% higher than the odds for men without ED. CONCLUSIONS:: Men with ED were more likely to have hypertension than men without ED. This evidence supports the hypothesis that ED shares common risk factors with hypertension. It also suggests that men with ED and clinicians could use ED as an alerting signal to detect and treat undiagnosed hypertension earlier.     

Association between comorbidity and erectile dysfunction in patients with diabetes

The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) and its relationship with comorbidity in patients with diabetes. The study population comprised of 312 consecutive patients aged 20 years or over residing in the city of Hamadan in Iran in 2005. Depression was assessed by the modified version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and ED by the short form of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire. Potential confounding was controlled by stratification and by a logistic regression model. The prevalence of moderate or complete ED (IIEF score 相似文献   

Erectile dysfunction as a predictor of the metabolic syndrome in aging men: results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study

PURPOSE: The metabolic syndrome, characterized by central obesity, insulin dysregulation, abnormal lipids and borderline hypertension, is a precursor state for cardiovascular disease. We determined whether erectile dysfunction is predictive of the metabolic syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study, a population based prospective cohort observed at 3 points during approximately 15 years (T(1)-1987 to 1989, T(2)-1995 to 1997, T(3)-2002 to 2004). The metabolic syndrome was defined by using a modification of the Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. The association between erectile dysfunction and the metabolic syndrome was assessed using relative risks and 95% confidence intervals estimated using Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Analysis was conducted of 928 men without the metabolic syndrome at T(1). There were 293 men with incident metabolic syndrome, of which 56 had erectile dysfunction at baseline. Body mass index and the presence of 1 or 2 conditions constituting the metabolic syndrome definition were the strongest predictors of the metabolic syndrome. The association of erectile dysfunction with the metabolic syndrome (unadjusted RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.81) was modified by body mass index, with a stronger effect of erectile dysfunction in men with body mass index less than 25 (adjusted RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.09-4.02), and no erectile dysfunction and metabolic syndrome association in men with body mass index 25 or greater (adjusted RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.76-1.50). CONCLUSIONS: Erectile dysfunction was predictive of the metabolic syndrome only in men with body mass index less than 25. This finding suggests that erectile dysfunction may provide a warning sign and an opportunity for early intervention in men otherwise considered at lower risk for the metabolic syndrome and subsequent cardiovascular disease.     

Effect of lower urinary tract symptoms on the incidence of erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: We determined the effect of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) on the incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The target population consisted of all men 50, 60 or 70 years old residing in Tampere area, Finland in 1994. Questionnaires were mailed to 3,143 men in 1994 and to 2,864 men 5 years later. The followup sample consisted of the 1,683 men who responded to baseline and followup questionnaires. We estimated the effect of LUTS and bother on the incidence of ED during the 5-year followup among the 1,126 men free from ED at baseline. ED was assessed by 2 questions on subject ability to achieve and maintain erection sufficient for intercourse and LUTS assessed by the Danish Prostatic Symptom Score. Logistic regression model was used in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of ED increased with the presence and with the intensity of urinary symptoms and bother at baseline. Compared with men with LUTS score 0, the incidence of ED was 2.7 (95% CI 1.3-5.5) times higher among men with score 7 to 11, and 3.1 times with score 12 or more. The incidence of ED increased by 5% for each 1-point increment in LUTS score, while it increased by 12% and 11% for 1-point increment in cumulative symptom or bother score, respectively. Men with cumulative symptoms or bother score 4 or more were significantly 2.0 to 2.7 times at higher incidence of ED relative to those who were free from symptoms or bother at baseline. Only overflow incontinence (OR = 2.2) and incomplete emptying (OR = 1.8) independently increased the incidence of ED. CONCLUSIONS: Lower urinary tract symptoms and bother independently increase the incidence of erectile dysfunction.