Gefitinib (Iressa) trials in non-small cell lung cancer

Gefitinib (Iressa) is a synthetic anilinoquinazoline capable of inhibiting the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase in vitro at nanomolar concentrations. In phase I trials, gefitinib was well tolerated at doses above that required to induce antitumor effects in vitro. Notably, antitumor activity was observed in lung cancer patients. These findings resulted in the initiation of phase II trials employing gefitinib monotherapy in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (the so-called IDEAL trials). Study participants were randomized to 250 mg or 500 mg of gefitinib per day. Objective response rates between 10 and 20% were achieved with minimal host related toxicity (mainly acne like rash and mild diarrhea). Median survivals ranged between 6 and 8 months. Subsequently, phase III trials (the so-called INTACT trials) combined gefitinib and chemotherapy in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. These trials failed to demonstrate a survival advantage with the addition of gefitinib to standard platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. However, overall host related toxicities were not substantially worsened with the addition of gefitinib to chemotherapy. Further studies employing single agent gefitinib as well as regimens employing a different sequencing of chemotherapy and gefitinib are planned in recurrent and previously untreated lung cancer patients.     

A phase I dose-escalation study of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery in combination with gefitinib in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with gefitinib in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A Phase I clinical trial was performed. Eligible patients had pathologically proved recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. Patients started gefitinib (250 mg/day) 7 days before SRS and continued for 1 year or until disease progression. SRS was delivered in three fractions over 3 days. The planning target volume (PTV) was the T1-weighted MRI postcontrast enhancing lesion+2 mm. The first cohort received an SRS dose of 18 Gy, and subsequent cohorts received higher doses up to the maximum dose of 36 Gy. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was any Grade 3 toxicity. The MTD was exceeded if 2 of 6 patients in a cohort experienced DLT. RESULTS: Characteristics of the 15 patients enrolled were: 9 men, 6 women; median age, 47 years (range, 23-65 years); 11 glioblastoma, 4 AA; median prior RT dose, 60 Gy (range, 54-61.2 Gy); median interval since RT, 12 months (range, 3-57 months); median PTV, 41 cc (range, 12-151 cc). Median follow-up time was 7 months (range, 2-28 months). Median time on gefitinib was 5 months (range, 2-12 months). No patient experienced a DLT, and the SRS dose was escalated from 18 to 36 Gy. Grade 1-2 gefitinib-related dermatitis and diarrhea were common (10 and 7 patients, respectively). CONCLUSION: Fractionated SRS to a dose of 36 Gy in three fractions is well tolerated with gefitinib at daily dose of 250 mg. Further studies of SRS and novel molecular targeted agents are warranted in this challenging clinical setting.     

Outcomes after second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma: a retrospective case–control study

Studies looking at the benefit of surgery at first relapse (second surgery) for recurrent glioblastoma were confounded by including patients with varying grades of glioma, performance status and extent of resection. This case–controlled study aims to remove these confounders to assess the survival impact of second surgery in recurrent glioblastoma. Retrospective data on patients with glioblastoma recurrence at two tertiary Australian hospitals from July 2009 to April 2015 was reviewed. Patients who had surgery at recurrence were matched with those who did not undergo surgery at recurrence, based on the extent of their initial resection and age. Overall survival (OS1 assessed from initial diagnosis and OS2 from the date of recurrence) as well as functional outcomes after resection were analysed. There were 120 patients (60 in each institution); median age at diagnosis was 56 years. Median OS1 was 14 months (95% CI 11.5–15.7) versus 22 months (95% CI 18–25) in patients who did not undergo second surgery and those with surgery at recurrence. OS2 was improved by second surgery (4.7 vs 9.6, HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38–0.72, P?<?0.001), and by chemotherapy, given at recurrence, (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24–0.92, P?=?0.03). After second surgery, 80% did not require rehabilitation and 61% were independently mobile. Second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma was associated with a survival advantage. Chemotherapy independent of surgery, also improved survival. Functional outcomes were encouraging. More research is required in the era of improved surgical techniques and new antineoplastic therapies.

     

A pilot trial of gefitinib in combination with docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Despite improvements in conventional treatment, patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a poor prognosis, leaving a significant unmet need for novel treatments. One such novel, biologically targeted agent is the orally active epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib. This open-label pilot trial investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of 2 doses of gefitinib (250 and 500 mg per day) combined with docetaxel (75 mg/m2) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC as first- and second-line chemotherapy. Eighteen patients were recruited: 6 received gefitinib 250 mg per day plus docetaxel; 12 received gefitinib 500 mg per day plus docetaxel. Combination therapy was feasible with no overlapping toxicities. No patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at 250 mg per day; 1 patient had 2 DLT events at 500 mg per day (grade 3 rash and diarrhea for >4 days). Adverse events were mild to moderate, including fatigue, mucositis, nausea, anorexia, rash, diarrhea, and fever. Docetaxel did not appear to alter steady-state exposure to gefitinib. The effect of gefitinib on exposure to docetaxel was equivocal; with the exception of 2 patients in the gefitinib 250 mg per day dose group, there appeared to be no trend toward a higher or lower exposure to docetaxel when given in the presence of gefitinib compared with that when given alone. Combination therapy was associated with antitumor activity and responses were seen with gefitinib in 2 of 6 patients at 250 mg per day and 4 of 12 patients at 500 mg per day. This combination is feasible and has an acceptable and predictable safety profile, as well as associated antitumor activity.     

High-dose sequential chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell autografting in patients with refractory and/or recurrent Hodgkin lymphoma: a multicenter study of the intergruppo Italiano Linfomi showing prolonged disease free survival in patients treated at first recurrence

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to evaluate in a multicenter setting the feasibility and efficacy of a high-dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy regimen that combined intensive debulking and high-dose therapy (HDT) with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autografting in patients with refractory or recurrent Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). METHODS: Data were collected from 102 patients with HL who were treated with the HDS regimen at 14 centers associated with the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi. Twenty-four patients had primary refractory HL, 59 patients had their first recurrence of HL (within 1 year in 32 patients and > 1 year in 27 patients), and 19 patients had multiple disease recurrences. The HDS regimen included the sequential delivery of high-dose (hd) cyclophosphamide with PBPC harvesting, methotrexate, etoposide, then HDT (usually hd mitoxantrone plus L-phenylalanine mustard) with PBPC autografting. In addition, radiotherapy was delivered to 36 patients at sites of bulky or persistent disease. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients (90%) completed the HDS program. There were five toxic deaths (treatment-related mortality rate, 4.9%) and six secondary malignan cies (five patients developed myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myelogenous leukemia, and one patient developed colorectal carcinoma). At a median follow-up of 5 years, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) projections were 64% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 54-74%) and 53% (95% CI, 43-63%), respectively. Patients with their first recurrence had the most favorable outcome, with 5-year OS and EFS projections of 77% (95% CI, 66-88%) and 63% (95% CI, 50-76%), respectively. There were no significant differences between patients with early first recurrence and late first recurrence. The poorest outcome was observed in patients with refractory HL, with 5-year OS and EFS projections of 36% (95% CI, 16-55%) and 33% (95% CI, 14-52%), respectively. Patients who received HDS chemotherapy after multiple recurrences had an intermediate outcome. Multivariate analysis showed that refractory disease and systemic symptoms at the time of initial presentation were associated significantly associated with poor OS and EFS. CONCLUSIONS: The use of HDS chemotherapy for patients with refractory and/or recurrent HL is feasible at the multicenter level. The combination of intensive debulking and HDT with PBPC autografting offers a good chance of prolonged disease free survival for patients with their first recurrence of HL.     

Phase I study of gefitinib plus celecoxib in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: Effective and tolerable palliative treatments are needed for patients with incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Single-agent targeted therapies have limited activity in this setting. The feasibility of adding celecoxib to gefitinib for the treatment of incurable SCCHN is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with unresectable recurrent locoregional and/or distant metastatic SCCHN with progressive disease after at least one prior chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy regimen were enrolled onto this single-institution phase I study. Three dose levels were explored: (1) celecoxib 200 mg twice daily plus gefitinib 250 mg daily; (2) celecoxib 400 mg twice daily plus gefitinib 250 mg daily; and (3) celecoxib 400 mg twice daily plus gefitinib 500 mg daily. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were encountered at any dose level. The most common toxicities were acneiform rash, diarrhea, hand reaction, dyspepsia, and anemia. Four of 18 patients assessable for response (22%; 95% CI, 2% to 42%) achieved a confirmed partial response. CONCLUSION: The combination of gefitinib 500 mg daily plus celecoxib 400 mg twice daily is well-tolerated. The encouraging responses seen in this early study suggest further evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in SCCHN is warranted.     

Phase II study of gefitinib in patients with relapsed or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma and evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and immunohistochemical expression: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial assessed the activity and tolerability of a daily oral dose of 500 mg gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa) in patients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma, and explored the clinical value of determining the status of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Primary measure of efficacy was progression-free survival at 6 months. Mutations in exons 18 to 21 of EGFR and/or immunohistochemical expression of EGFR were evaluated in tumor specimens from patients enrolled in this trial as well as from patients not treated with gefitinib. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 30 (90%) patients were eligible and evaluable for analysis of gefitinib efficacy and toxicity. Of these, four survived progression-free >6 months with one objective response (4%). The most commonly observed grade 3 toxicities were dermatologic (15%, 4 of 27) and diarrhea (30%, 8 of 27). Specimens from 26 of 26 or 25 of 26 patients were evaluable for immunohistochemical or mutation analysis, respectively. The response rate for patients with EGFR-positive tumors was 9% (1 of 11). EGFR expression was associated with longer progression-free survival (P = 0.008) and possibly longer survival (P = 0.082). The patient with the only objective response had a mutation in the catalytic domain of the tumor's EGFR (P = 0.04). Among 32 invasive tumors from patients not treated with gefitinib, one exhibited a catalytic domain mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Gefitinib was well tolerated but had minimal activity in unscreened patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Prescreening patients for activating mutations in EGFR may improve response rate to gefitinib. This report is the first to document activating mutations in catalytic domain of EGFR in 3.5% (2 of 57) of ovarian cancers.     

Phase II trials of erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with recurrent meningioma

There are no established treatments for recurrent meningioma when surgical and radiation options are exhausted. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is often over-expressed in meningiomas and may promote tumor growth. In open label, single arm phase II studies of the EGFR inhibitors gefitinib (NABTC 00-01) and erlotinib (NABTC 01-03) for recurrent malignant gliomas, we included exploratory subsets of recurrent meningioma patients. We have pooled the data and report the results here. Patients with recurrent histologically confirmed meningiomas with no more than 2 previous chemotherapy regimens were treated with gefitinib 500 mg/day or erlotinib 150 mg/day until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. Twenty-five eligible patients were enrolled with median age 57 years (range 29–81) and median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score 90 (range 60–100). Sixteen patients (64%) received gefitinib and 9 (36%) erlotinib. Eight patients (32%) had benign tumors, 9 (36%) atypical, and 8 (32%) malignant. For benign tumors, the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) was 25%, 12-month PFS (PFS12) 13%, 6-month overall survival (OS6) 63%, and 12-month OS (OS12) 50%. For atypical and malignant tumors, PFS6 was 29%, PFS12 18%, OS6 71%, and OS12 65%. The PFS and OS were not significantly different by histology. There were no objective imaging responses, but 8 patients (32%) maintained stable disease. Although treatment was well-tolerated, neither gefitinib nor erlotinib appear to have significant activity against recurrent meningioma. The role of EGFR inhibitors in meningiomas is unclear. Evaluation of multi-targeted inhibitors and EGFR inhibitors in combination with other targeted molecular agents may be warranted.     

Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene predict prolonged survival after gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with postoperative recurrence.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene and the effectiveness of gefitinib treatment in patients with recurrent lung cancer after pulmonary resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We sequenced exons 18-21 of the EGFR gene using total RNA extracted from 59 patients with lung cancer who were treated with gefitinib for recurrent lung cancer. Gefitinib effectiveness was evaluated by both imaging studies and change in serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. RESULTS: EGFR mutations were found in 33 patients (56%). Of these mutations, 17 were deletions around codons 746-750 and 15 were point mutations (12 at codon 858, three at other codons), and one was an insertion. EGFR mutations were significantly more prevalent in females, adenocarcinoma, and never-smokers. Gefitinib treatment resulted in tumor shrinkage and/or CEA decrease to less than half of the baseline level in 26 patients, tumor growth and/or CEA elevation in 24 patients, and gefitinib effect was not assessable in nine patients. Female, never-smoking patients with adenocarcinoma tended to respond better to gefitinib treatment. Gefitinib was effective in 24 of 29 patients with EGFR mutations, compared with two of 21 patients without mutations (P < .0001). Of note, del746-750 might be superior to L858R mutations for prediction of gefitinib response. Patients with EGFR mutations survived for a longer period than those without the mutations after initiation of gefitinib treatment (P = .0053). CONCLUSION: EGFR mutations were a good predictor of clinical benefit of gefitinib in this setting.     

Long-term stabilization in patients with malignant glioma after treatment with liposomal doxorubicin.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and poor blood-brain barrier penetration are major limitations in the treatment of malignant glioma. To improve drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier, the authors used doxorubicin as liposomal encapsulated formulation (Caelyx, Scheringh-Plough, Munich, Germany) in therapy of recurrent malignant glioma. METHODS: Fifteen patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas were included in the study. Of these, 13 patients could be evaluated, including 6 patients with glioblastoma, 1 patient with gliosarcoma and 6 patients with anaplastic astrocytoma. The treatment consisted of liposomal doxorubicin (20 mg/m(2)), applied intravenously every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Stabilization of the disease was observed in 54% (7 of 13) of patients. Partial response and complete response (CR) were not observed. Median time-to-progression was 11 weeks. Progression free survival at 12 months was 15%. Median overall survival (OS) after doxorubicin therapy was 40.0 weeks, whereas the median OS after diagnosis reached 20.0 months (87.0 weeks). Doxorubicin was well tolerated, with main side effects being palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia occurring in 38% and myelotoxicity (World Health Organization Grade 3-4) in 31% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Doxorubicin has been shown to be a safe treatment with moderate activity that may lead to long-term stabilization in recurrent high-grade glioma patients. Of note, median OS after all and after initiation of recurrence therapy was prolonged in comparison with the OS in other Phase II studies, as recently described by Wong et al. (Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ, Jaeckle KA, Kyritsis AP, Prados MD, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:2572.).     

Gefitinib as first-line, compassionate use therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of single-agent gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839), an oral, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as first-line compassionate use therapy for advanced non-small-cell Lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients who were unfit or refused chemotherapy received oral gefitinib 250mg daily as first-line therapy for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic NSCLC in a compassionate use program at a single institution. RESULTS: Four of 22 evaluable patients (18%), two with adenocarcinomas and two with bronchioloalveolar carcinomas, had an objective response and five patients (23%) had stable disease. Duration of response or stable disease was 3.5-22+ months. Median time to progression was 2.2 months, median survival was 12.6 months and 1-year survival 52%. The partial response plus stable disease rate by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was 4/5 for PS 0 patients; 3/6 for PS 1-2 patients; and 2/14 for PS 3-4 patients. The two patients with PS > 2 who derived benefit from gefitinib had PS 3 due to co-morbidities. Two patients discontinued therapy due to severe toxicities: one patient had severe liver dysfunction and hemorrhagic cystitis, and another patient developed diarrhea with hypotension. A correlation between rash and antitumor activity was noted. Of seven patients who received chemotherapy subsequent to gefitinib, one had a partial response, three had stable disease, two progressed, and one was non-evaluable for response. CONCLUSION: We report encouraging response and survival results with gefitinib as first-line treatment in unselected patients with advanced NSCLC. Gefitinib monotherapy should undergo further evaluation as first-line therapy in advanced NSCLC.     

Gefitinib in patients with progressive high-grade gliomas: a multicentre phase II study by Gruppo Italiano Cooperativo di Neuro-Oncologia (GICNO)

To investigate the role of gefitinib in patients with high-grade gliomas (HGGs), a phase II trial (1839IL/0116) was conducted in patients with disease recurrence following surgery plus radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy. Adult patients with histologically confirmed recurrent HGGs following surgery, radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy, were considered eligible. Patients were treated with gefitinib (250 mg day(-1)) continuously until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival at 6 months progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6). Tissue biomarkers (epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene status and expression, phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) expression) were assessed. Twenty-eight patients (median age, 55 years; median ECOG performance status, 1) were enrolled; all were evaluable for drug activity and safety. Sixteen patients had glioblastoma, three patients had anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and nine patients had anaplastic astrocytoma. Five patients (17.9%, 95% CI 6.1-36.9%) showed disease stabilisation. The overall median time to progression was 8.4 (range 2-104+) weeks and PFS-6 was 14.3% (95% CI 4.0-32.7%). The median overall survival was 24.6 weeks (range 4-104+). No grade 3-4 gefitinib-related toxicity was found. Gefitinib showed limited activity in patients affected by HGGs. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression or gene status, and p-Akt expression do not seem to predict activity of this drug.     

Timing of re-irradiation in recurrent high-grade gliomas: a single institution study

There is no standard treatment available for recurrent high-grade gliomas. This monoinstitutional retrospective analysis evaluates the differences in overall survival and progression-free survival in patients according to the timing of re-irradiation. Patients suffering from a glioblastoma who received re-irradiation for recurrence were evaluated retrospectively. The median overall survival (OS) and the median progression-free survival were compared with different treatment options and within various time periods. From January 2007 until March 2015, 41 patients suffering from recurrent high-grade gliomas received re-irradiation [median dose of 30.6 Gy (range 20–40 Gy) in median 4 Gy fractions (range 1.8–5 Gy)] in our institution after initial postoperative irradiation or combined radiochemotherapy. The OS in this population was 34 months, and the OS after recurrence (OS-R) was 13 months. After diagnosis of recurrence, patients underwent additional surgical resection after a median of 1.2 months, received a second-line systemic therapy after 2.2 months with or without re-irradiation after 5.7 months. Growth of the tumour was assessed 4.3 months after the start of re-irradiation. The OS after the second surgical resection was 12.2 months, 11.7 months after the start of the second-line systemic therapy, and 6.7 months after the start of re-irradiation. The OS-R was not significantly correlated with the start of re-irradiation after a diagnosis of recurrence or the time period after the previous surgery. At this institution, re-irradiation was performed later compared to other treatment options. However, select patients could benefit from irradiation at an earlier time point. A precise time point should still be evaluated on an individual basis due to the patient’s diverse conditions.     

Phase I study of AEE788, a novel multitarget inhibitor of ErbB- and VEGF-receptor-family tyrosine kinases, in recurrent glioblastoma patients

Purpose

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) play a significant role in glioblastoma angiogenesis and proliferation, making tyrosine kinase (TK) receptors logical targets for treatment. We evaluated AEE788, a reversible TK inhibitor that inhibits EGFR and VEGFR, in recurrent glioblastoma patients.

Methods

In this dose-escalation, phase I study, patients with recurrent glioblastoma received AEE788 once daily in 28-day cycles in stratified subgroups: those receiving (1) non-enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants drugs or no anticonvulsants (Group A) and (2) enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant drugs (Group B). A dose-expansion phase stratified patients by surgical eligibility. Primary objectives were to determine dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose; secondary objectives included evaluating (1) safety/tolerability, (2) pharmacokinetics, and (3) preliminary antitumor activity.

Results

Sixty-four glioblastoma patients were enrolled. Two Group A patients experienced DLTs (proteinuria and stomatitis) at 550?mg; 550?mg was, therefore, the highest dose evaluated and dose limiting. One Group B patient receiving 800?mg experienced a DLT (diarrhea). The initially recommended dose for dose-expansion phase for Group A was 400?mg; additional patients received 250?mg to assess the hepatotoxicity. Most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) included diarrhea and rash. Serious AEs, most commonly grade 3/4 liver function test elevations, were responsible for treatment discontinuation in 17% of patients. AEE788 concentrations were reduced by EIACD. The best overall response was stable disease (17%).

Conclusions

Continuous, once-daily AEE788 was associated with unacceptable toxicity and minimal activity for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. The study was, therefore, discontinued prematurely.     

Combination therapy with gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the tolerability, pharmacokinetic interaction and antitumor activity of gefitinib ("Iressa", ZD1839), an orally active, selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in chemotherapy-na?ve patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label feasibility trial evaluating two doses of gefitinib (250 and 500 mg/day) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Gefitinib was administered daily from day 2 onwards. Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) was given on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 for up to six 3-week cycles. Patients could then continue to receive gefitinib monotherapy. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were entered, nine at each gefitinib dose level. Two patients developed dose-limiting toxicity: one grade 3 convulsion (250 mg/day dose group) and one grade 3 rash (500 mg/day dose group). The most frequently occurring adverse events in the combination phase were vomiting (17 patients), asthenia (16), nausea (14), diarrhea (14) and skin rash (13). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were vomiting (seven patients), asthenia (six), thrombocytopenia (six), diarrhea (five) and anorexia (five). Pharmacokinetic analyses showed no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between gefitinib and cisplatin or gemcitabine, with the exception of a possible small increase in the geometric mean exposure to gemcitabine seen on day 8 of therapy when given alone with the higher dose of gefitinib. Of 17 evaluable patients, nine had confirmed partial responses, seven had stable disease and one had progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy of gefitinib with cisplatin and gemcitabine had a manageable and predictable safety profile, no major effect on exposure to any of the three drugs and antitumor activity.     

Phase II study of MEDI-575, an anti-platelet-derived growth factor-α antibody,in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

MEDI-575, an immunoglobulin G2κ monoclonal antibody, selectively binds to platelet-derived growth factor-α receptor (PDGFR-α) with high specificity. This multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of MEDI-575 in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Adults with first recurrence of glioblastoma following surgery, temozolomide, and radiation received MEDI-575 25 mg/kg intravenously over 60 min every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Six-month progression-free survival rate (PFS-6) was the primary end point; secondary measures included response rate, overall survival (OS), and safety/tolerability. PDGFR-α expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Fifty-six patients were enrolled; median age was 56.5 years (range 23–79), 66?% were male, and 66?% were aged ≥65 years. PFS-6 was 15.4?% [90?% confidence interval (CI) 8.1–24.9]. No complete or partial responses were observed; 23 (41.1?%) patients had stable disease as best response. Median PFS was 1.4 months (90?% CI 1.4, 1.8); median OS was 9.7 months (90?% CI 6.5, 11.8). The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (16?%), nausea (13?%), and fatigue (13?%). Twelve (21?%) patients reported grade ≥3 AEs, with hydrocephalus (n?=?3), dysphagia (n?=?2), and convulsion (n?=?2) reported in more than 1 patient. Two patients had treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs of decreased lymphocyte count and asthenia (n?=?1 each). Seven patients (13?%) discontinued MEDI-575 owing to AEs. Labeling of PDGFRα in glioblastoma cells and tumor-associated stromal cells was highly variable, with no correlation with PFS. MEDI-575, although well tolerated, had limited clinical activity in recurrent glioblastoma.     

Gefitinib in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid and irinotecan in patients with 5-FU/oxaliplatin- refractory colorectal cancer: a phase I/II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Internistische Onkologie (AIO)

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. It potentiates cytotoxic drug activity in human xenografts. This phase I/II dose-finding study evaluated gefitinib in combination with a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA)/irinotecan (FOLFIRI-AIO) regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received gefitinib 250 mg per day, and escalating doses of FOLFIRI-AIO i.v. (dose level (DL) 1: 1600/ 500/60 mg/m(2); DL2: 1600/500/80 mg/m(2); DL3: 2000/500/ 80 mg/m(2)) weekly x 6. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was determined in patients who completed 1 cycle of therapy. RESULTS: 13 patients were enrolled. 1 out of 6 patients on DL1 exhibited DLT (acute psychosis), and a total of 7 patients received DL2. Of those, 3 patients had DLT during cycle 1 (nausea/vomiting n = 2; diarrhea n = 1, fatigue n = 2). Recruitment was stopped at this DL because of the unfavorable toxicity profile observed during the first and subsequent treatment cycles (out of 7 patients: nausea/vomiting grade 3 n = 2, diarrhea grade 3 n = 2; fatigue n = 3). Only 1 patient showed a partial remission, and 2 patients experienced stabilization of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation had to be stopped early because of gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue. This treatment regimen did not seem advantageous with respect to efficacy in comparison with FOLFIRIAIO alone.     

Pilot trial of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib plus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Gefitinib is an oral agent that inhibits the tyrosine kinase of the epidermal growth factor receptor. In phase I trials gefitinib was well tolerated and antitumor activity was seen in pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Preclinical studies indicated enhanced effects when gefitnib was added to carboplatin or paclitaxel. This pilot trial combined gefitinib with carboplatin and paclitaxel to define the toxicities of the combination and assess drug-drug interactions in untreated advanced NSCLC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Initially (part 1) patients were randomly assigned to receive intermittent gefitinib with cycle 1 or 2 of chemotherapy. Thereafter (part 2), the highest dose of gefitinib that was given without dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) from part 1 was administered continuously beginning with the first cycle of chemotherapy. Three sequentially enrolled cohorts received gefitinib 250 and 500 mg (intermittently) and 500 mg (continuously). RESULTS: We treated 24 patients; nine patients with 250 mg and 15 patients with 500 mg (nine patients continuous). Two occurrences of DLT were observed. One patient (500 mg, part 1) developed grade 3 rash and another patient (part 2) developed prolonged neutropenia. Steady-state gefitinib levels did not affect exposure to chemotherapy. In a limited sample, chemotherapy modestly increased the gefitinib area under concentration-time curve at steady-state and minimum steady-state trough concentration. Partial responses were observed in five of 24 patients. The median survival was 8 months. CONCLUSION: The gefitinib with carboplatin and paclitaxel regimen was generally well tolerated and no unanticipated toxicities or clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Both doses of gefitinib were believed to be safe for further study with chemotherapy. This regimen was thus tested in a completed randomized phase III trial.     

Survival of patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Brain metastases (BM) is one of the most crucial distant metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. There is no consensus about which EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is most effective against BM in such patients. Here, we compared prognoses of patients with EGFR-TKI naïve EGFR-positive BM treated with erlotinib or gefitinib after BM diagnosis. Of 269 patients with NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKIs at a single institution, we reviewed medical records of 205 patients with documented EGFR mutations. Eleven patients were administered erlotinib, and 52 patients were administered gefitinib as the first-line EGFR-TKI treatment after diagnosis. We used propensity score matching to balance patient backgrounds between groups, and the log-rank test to compare survival curves. Patients with BM at the induction of chemotherapy had a poorer prognosis than those without BM [median overall survival (OS) 18.5 vs. 28.0 months]. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in OS between those with or without BM at the initiation of EGFR-TKI treatment (20.3 vs. 23.8 months). Median OS of patients treated with erlotinib was not significantly longer than that of patients treated with gefitinib (25.0 vs. 18.1 months). The presence of BM at the initiation of EGFR-TKI treatment had no apparent effect on survival. Erlotinib was deemed more effective than gefitinib in preventing intracranial lesions and prolonging survival; however, prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.     

Results from a pilot Phase I trial of gefitinib combined with docetaxel and estramustine in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib, which is an orally active epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated activity against hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) in preclinical studies. In this pilot Phase I trial, the authors evaluated the tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of gefitinib combined with estramustine and docetaxel in patients with HRPC. METHODS: Patients received gefitinib (at a dose of 250 mg/day or 500 mg/day) on each day of a 21-day treatment cycle. Docetaxel (at a dose of 60 mg/m(2)) was administered on Day 1, and estramustine (at a dose of 280 mg) was administered 3 times daily on Days 1 through 5. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were recruited at each gefitinib dose level. The most common adverse events observed were consistent with the known profiles of gefitinib, docetaxel, and estramustine. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Adverse events considered to be gefitinib related included diarrhea (n = 23 patients), rash (n = 8 patients), nausea (n = 7 patients), dry skin (n = 6 patients), and emesis (n = 6 patients). Overall, 9 of 22 evaluable patients (40.9%) experienced a pain response. and 9 of 30 patients (30%) had a prostate-specific antigen response. A partial objective tumor response was demonstrated in 1 of 13 evaluable patients (7.7%) in each dose group; the median time to progression for both doses combined was 185 days (range, 28-233 days). Data comparisons within individual patients suggested that docetaxel and estramustine had no effect on gefitinib steady-state levels. Gefitinib had no effect on docetaxel exposure at the 250-mg dose but decreased exposure at the 500-mg dose. However, gefitinib may increase exposure to estramustine, particularly at the 500 mg/day dose. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study demonstrated that gefitinib combined with estramustine and docetaxel had acceptable and predictable tolerability. However, it is unclear whether gefitinib provides an additional clinical benefit over docetaxel and estramustine alone.