Multicentre Italian Study Group (MISG) for the standardisation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) PCR.

BACKGROUND: Several studies on standardisation of NAT assays for diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have been carried out in European countries. In fact the widespreading use of nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) in diagnostic centres for the evaluation of the HCV infection, requires the application of reference external standards to control laboratory performance; but up to date they are not routinely used. OBJECTIVES: Fifteen diagnostic centres of major Italian Hospitals participated to a quality control study for the standardisation of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based HCV-RNA detection, organised by the Committee for the Study of Biotechnology (CoSBio) of the Italian Society of Clinical Microbiology (AMCLI). All the participant centres (PC) used commercial assays, automated or semi-automated. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed in four rounds. Altogether each centre received 14 reference negative and 22 reference positive sera. The range of copies number per ml of the reference positive sera was 10(4)-10(7). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Considering the 540 samples tested, 4.54% of false negative (FN) and 4.28% of false positive (FP) results were reported. Thereafter the sensitivity and the specificity were 95.65 and 95.89%, respectively. The errors were distributed among seven out of the 15 PCs. The percentage of FP results was uniformly distributed in each shipment, whereas FN results emerged with the sera at lower HCV genome copies number. The analysis of the data obtained suggests that FP as well as FN results may be attributable to errors or to others problems of laboratories. To improve the performance of Italian, as well as of laboratories throughout the world, the use of external reference standards in multicentre collaborative studies will be required.     

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) for HCV RNA in Italian transfusion centres: an external quality assessment.

BACKGROUND: We conducted an external quality assessment of the results obtained in Italian transfusion centre laboratories employing nucleic acid testing (NAT) for detection of HCV RNA in donated blood. STUDY DESIGN: Of 110 transfusions centres in Italy, 101 voluntarily participated. Each laboratory received seven separate shipments of samples for HCV RNA testing by NAT. Each shipment contained 8 plasma samples for a total of 23 negative and 33 positive samples with viral loads ranging from 25 to 1000 IU/mL. RESULTS: Of the 2080 HCV RNA-negative samples, 14 (0.7%) were reported as positive. The highest percent of false-negative results (6.9%) was found on samples from the first shipment with viral loads from 75 to 100 IU/mL. In subsequent shipments, the highest false-negative percentage ranged from 0.6% for samples with viral loads of 170-1000 IU/mL to 3.4% for samples with viral loads of 35-50 IU/mL. A false-negative rate of 4.9% occurred in samples in the sixth shipment with the lowest viral load (25IU/mL). Five (4.9%) centres were identified as having laboratories with low-performance. There were no significant differences among genotypes 1b, 2c and 3a with respect to percent of false-negative results reported. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the accuracy of NAT observed in this study of Italian transfusion centre laboratories was excellent for all HCV genotypes tested, even for samples with low HCV RNA titres.     

Evaluation of an automated, highly sensitive, real-time PCR-based assay (COBAS Amplipreptrade mark/COBAS TaqMantrade mark) for quantification of HCV RNA

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and its therapy is based on qualitative and quantitative measurement of HCV RNA. OBJECTIVES: A new assay that employs automated specimen extraction and real-time RT-PCR (COBAS Amplipreptrade mark/COBAS TaqMantrade mark, "CAP/CTM", Roche Diagnostics, Pleasanton, USA) was designed for linear quantification and highly sensitive detection of HCV RNA. STUDY DESIGN: The performance characteristics of CAP/CTM were compared to standard RT-PCR-based COBAS Amplicor Monitor 2.0 (CAM) assay in a multicenter study. RESULTS: The limit of detection of CAP/CTM was 7.4IU/ml (95% CI 6.2-10.6) and clinical specificity was 99%. The linear range of HCV RNA quantification by CAP/CTM was between 28 and 1.4x10(7)IU/ml, with a correlation coefficient between expected and observed results of >0.99. A fivefold dilution of serum- or plasma-samples showed a linear correlation of HCV RNA levels in undiluted and diluted samples. Analyses of the mean intra- and inter-assay imprecision within the linear range of quantification showed a coefficient of variation of 3% and 3%, respectively. HCV genotypes 1a/b, 2b, 3a, 4, 5 and 6 were equally quantified by the CAP/CTM and CAM assay with mean deviations ranging from -0.29log(10) to 0.32log(10)IU/ml. HCV RNA quantification by CAP/CTM and CAM was highly concordant (correlation coefficient of 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The CAP/CTM assay is a reliable and robust assay for highly sensitive detection and quantification of HCV RNA within a broad linear range.     

Calibration of HIV-1 working reagents for nucleic acid amplification techniques against the 1st international standard for HIV-1 RNA

Many laboratories use working reagents/run controls to monitor the performance of their nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAT) for the measurement of HIV-1 RNA. A collaborative study was carried out in order to calibrate seven internationally available working reagents, QC105 (National Serology Reference Laboratory [NRL], Australia), B5 and B10 (Center for Biological Evaluation and Research [CBER], USA), Pelispy (Central Laboratory of the Netherlands Blood Transfusion Service [CLB], The Netherlands), PWS-1 and PWS-3 (National Institute for Biological Standards and Control [NIBSC], UK) and IRC (Virology Networks [VN], The Netherlands) against the 1st International Standard for HIV-1 RNA (code 97/656). Twenty-one laboratories from 12 different countries participated in the collaborative study and from the results it was determined that QC105 contained 4.0 log(10) International Units (IU)/ml, B5 2.2 log(10) IU/ml, B10 3.8 log(10) IU/ml, Pelispy 4.4 log(10) IU/ml, PWS-1 3.6 log(10) IU/ml, PWS-3 2.7 log(10) IU/ml and IRC 4.3 log(10) IU/ml. The seven working reagents calibrated in this international study may be used to validate and standardise the large number of qualitative and quantitative, commercial and in-house NAT assays that are currently being applied in the fields of blood safety and patient management. They will also help laboratories to comply with the sensitivity requirements that may be brought in by the regulatory authorities and may contribute to further harmonisation of guidelines on NAT published by organisations such as the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA), Paul-Ehrlich Institute and CBER, FDA.     

Standardized hepatitis C virus RNA panels for nucleic acid testing assays.

BACKGROUND: Methods for the quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA are useful in the clinical management of infected patients. However, the introduction of assays based upon various nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies, each utilizing a different set of standards, creates the potential for misinterpretation of patient results. OBJECTIVE: In order to address the need for worldwide standardization of these assays, a HCV RNA quantification panel (NAP HCV-RNA) calibrated against the World Health Organization (WHO) First International Standard for HCV RNA was prepared. The eight-member HCV RNA quantification panel was evaluated utilizing a variety of commercially available and in-house NAT technologies. STUDY DESIGN: NAP HCV-RNA panels were tested and analyzed using the methods and data reduction protocols specific to each NAT technology employed in this study (bDNA, TMA and two PCR methods). Proprietary units of measure from each assay were compared to WHO International Units (IU) for each panel member (0, 50, 500, 5000, 50000, 200000, 500000 and 2000000 IU/ml). RESULTS: Evaluation of the NAP HCV-RNA in a variety of NAT procedures demonstrated linearity across the range of target concentrations detected in each assay and R(2) values ranged from 0.9929 to 0.9995 across the four technologies. As expected, the correspondence of assay specific proprietary units to IU differed depending upon the technology utilized. CONCLUSIONS: NAP HCV-RNA provides a consistent, standardized method for comparing results across laboratories and technologies and is useful in ensuring the quality of NAT testing for HCV RNA, independent of the methodology used.     

Comparative evaluation of the total hepatitis C virus core antigen,branched-DNA,and amplicor monitor assays in determining viremia for patients with chronic hepatitis C during interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy

An assay prototype designed to detect and quantify total hepatitis C virus [HCV] core antigen (HCV core Ag) protein in serum and plasma in the presence or absence of anti-HCV antibodies has been recently developed by Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics. The aim of the study was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the Total HCV core Ag assay in comparison with two quantitative assays for HCV RNA: Quantiplex HCV RNA 2.0 (bDNA v2.0) or Versant HCV RNA 3.0 (bDNA v3.0) assays and the Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor version 2.0 (HCM v2.0) test. We have studied samples of a well-characterized panel and samples from patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with interferon alone or with ribavirin. We have also compared the kinetics of HCV core Ag and HCV RNA in the follow-up of treated patients. The HCV core Ag assay exhibited linear behavior across samples from different genotypes. The coefficients of variation for intra- and interassay performance were 5.11 and 9.95%, respectively. The specificity of the assay tested in blood donors was 99.5%. Samples from HCV-infected patients showed that the correlation between the HCV core Ag and the two HCV RNA quantitative assays (bDNA and HCM v2.0) was 0.8 and 0.7, respectively. This correlation was maintained across different genotypes of HCV (r(2) = 0.64 to 0.94). Baseline HCV core Ag values were significantly lower in sustained responders to interferon (IFN) than in other groups of patients (5.31 log(10) [10(4) pg/ml] versus 5.99 log(10) [10(4) pg/ml]; P < 0.001). In patients treated with IFN or combination therapy, we found an association between a decrease of more than 2 log IU/ml in viral load, undetectable HCV core Ag, and sustained response. Among sustained responders to IFN alone or combination therapy and among relapsers after IFN alone, 84 out of 101 (83.2%) had undetectable HCV core Ag, and 76 out of 96 (79.2%) had a viral load decrease of >/=2 log IU/ml, after 1 month of treatment. In conclusion, the Total HCV core Ag assay is a new useful test for the detection of HCV viremia and the monitoring of patients treated with IFN alone or in combination with ribavirin.     

Performance characteristics of a quantitative TaqMan hepatitis C virus RNA analyte-specific reagent

We determined the dynamic range, reproducibility, accuracy, genotype bias, and sensitivity of the TaqMan hepatitis C virus (HCV) analyte-specific reagent (ASR). Serum samples were processed using the MagNA Pure LC instrument and run on the COBAS TaqMan 48 analyzer. The performance characteristics of the ASR were also compared with those of the qualitative AMPLICOR and quantitative AMPLICOR MONITOR HCV tests. The ASR exhibited a >/=6-log(10) linear dynamic range and excellent reproducibility, with a mean coefficient of variation of 14%. HCV RNA concentration measured with the ASR agreed within an average of 0.42 log(10) (2.6-fold) of the labeled concentration with members of a standard reference panel. HCV genotypes 1 to 4 were amplified with similar efficiencies with the ASR. The ASR and AMPLICOR MONITOR viral load results were significantly correlated (r = 0.8898; P < 0.01), but the agreement was poor (mean difference, 0.45 +/- 0.35 log(10)) for 72 HCV RNA-positive clinical samples. However, 98.9% agreement between the ASR and qualitative AMPLICOR test results was found with 60 positive and 29 negative samples. Limiting-dilution experiments demonstrated that the limits of detection for ASR and AMPLICOR tests were 84 and 26 IU/ml, respectively. The performance characteristics of the TaqMan HCV ASR are appropriate for all clinical applications of HCV RNA testing.     

Detection and quantitation of HBV DNA in the WHO International Standard for HIV-1 RNA (NIBSC code: 97/656)

Nucleic-acid amplification technology (NAT) assays have been implemented for HCV and HIV-1 in the United States, and many parts of Europe, Australia and Asia. Nucleic acid detection assays utilize many different technologies, and the WHO International Standards for nucleic acid tests are widely used to compare them. Currently, several laboratories are developing an assay for simultaneous detection of HCV RNA, HIV-1 RNA and HBV DNA. In the course of such development it was observed that the WHO International Standard for HIV-1 RNA (97/656) was positive for HBV DNA. In this report we confirm the presence of HBV DNA in the HIV-1 international standard through the qualitative Procleix-Ultrio assay. Further, using the TaqMan technology, through quantitative Bead Capture-TaqMan assay, we report that approximately 1000IU/ml dilution of HIV RNA contains approximately 4500IU/ml of HBV DNA.     

External quality assessment for the molecular detection of Hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND, OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: External quality assessment (EQA) panels were distributed internationally by UK NEQAS for Microbiology to 159 participants for the detection, quantification and genotyping of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) in freeze-dried plasma from 2000 to 2004. The results were analysed to determine the level of standardisation of qualitative detection, quantitative detection and genotyping. RESULTS: The accurate detection of HCV in the panels varied from 86.9% to 100%. Four genotypes were distributed with the panels and there was no significant difference in the detection of different genotypes of HCV by participants. Further analysis indicated most variation occurred in quantification of HCV at lower concentrations and from 0% to 14.8% reported quantitative values outside 0.5 log(10) of the median value. In addition, three negative specimens were distributed and false positives were found to be rare (0.9-2.2%) with all methods included in the study. CONCLUSION: The laboratory detection of HCV in plasma EQA specimens was varied, with decreasing parity of quantification at lower concentrations of HCV. False positives and negatives were rare, irrespective of the genotype under test.     

High throughput screening of 16 million serologically negative blood donors for hepatitis B virus,hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus type-1 by nucleic acid amplification testing with specific and sensitive multiplex reagent in Japan

Nationwide nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) of blood donated voluntarily after serological screening was implemented on July 1st 1999 for transfusion and plasma fractionation by the Japanese Red Cross blood transfusion services. From February 1st 2000, HBV, HCV and HIV-1 NAT screening of pools of 50 negative serologically screened donated blood was started and the results were reported within 1 day after blood donation. Systems were established for rapid shipment, electronic communication, automated specimen preparation, pooling and automated amplification and detection. At present, NAT screening is carried out within 1 day after donation. This report describes the blood screening system by NAT and the results obtained from over 16 million blood samples using simultaneous screening for HBV, HCV and HIV-1 with multiplex reagent. Between February 1, 2000 and December 31, 2002, 16012175 serologically negative units were tested by NAT. 308 units with Hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA) were detected. The sensitivity of 50 pool NAT screening with input volume of 0.2 ml is significantly higher than that of highly sensitive HBsAg testing. 46 cases with HCV RNA and six cases with HIV-1 RNA were detected. These cases were not detected by HCV antibody and HIV-1 antibody screening. The false positive rate was 0.18%. The NAT system was developed from serological screening test negative non-remunerated voluntary donations. We supply blood products to medical organizations after screening by NAT for HBV, HCV and HIV-1 for transfusion and source plasma for fractionation. This is the first automated integrated system for prevention of transfusion transmitted HBV, HCV and HIV-1 infections, by NAT screening.     

Validation and standardisation of nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) assays for the detection of viral contamination of blood and blood products.

Standardisation of NAT assays is necessary before the introduction of such assays for routine screening of blood and blood products for viral contaminants such as HBV, HCV, and HIV-1. Standardisation can be achieved by the use of well-characterised reference materials (working reagents) to validate each assay run. Working reagents for HCV, HIV-1, HBV, HAV, and human parvovirus B19 have been established by the NIBSC. Such reagents and reference panels are also available from other official medicinal control laboratories and commercial organisations. However, the nucleic acid content of these reagents are expressed in many different units, e. g. genome equivalents/ml, copies/ml, PCR detectable units/ml, making comparisons of results from laboratories using different reagents difficult. The establishment of internationally accepted standards against which all working reagents could be calibrated, using a common standard unit of measurement, IU, would overcome this major problem. The first International Standard for HCV RNA assays was established in 1997. This reagent, 96/790, is a lyophilised preparation of a genotype 1 isolate and the concentration of the standard is 10(5) IU/ml. Two further International Standards have since been established; for HIV-1 and HBV, containing 10(5) IU/ml and 10(6) IU/ml respectively. The establishment of the HCV International Standard has been critical in the introduction of mandatory testing. Since 1st July 1999, all batches of blood products marketed in Europe have to be prepared from plasma pools tested and found non-reactive for HCV RNA using a validated assay which can detect a sample containing 100 IU/ml of HCV RNA. In Germany, screening of blood donations for HCV RNA by NAT has been mandatory since 1st April 1999. The minimum sensitivity of assays should be 5000 IU/ml for a single donation.     

Dynamic range of hepatitis C virus RNA quantification with the Cobas Ampliprep-Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor v2.0 assay

Accurate quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is needed in clinical practice to decide whether to continue or stop pegylated interferon-alpha-ribavirin combination therapy at week 12 of treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Currently the HCV RNA quantification assay most widely used worldwide is the Amplicor HCV Monitor v2.0 assay (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, Calif.). The HCV RNA extraction step can be automated in the Cobas Ampliprep device. In this work, we show that the dynamic range of HCV RNA quantification of the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor v2.0 procedure is 600 to 200,000 HCV RNA IU/ml (2.8 to 5.3 log IU/ml), which does not cover the full range of HCV RNA levels in infected patients. Any sample containing more than 200,000 IU/ml (5.3 log IU/ml) must thus be retested after dilution for accurate quantification. These results emphasize the need for commercial HCV RNA quantification assays with a broader range of linear quantification, such as real-time PCR-based assays.     

Verification of an assay for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA by use of an analyte-specific reagent and two different extraction methods

Protocols were designed for quantification and detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA by the use of an analyte-specific reagent (ASR) (Roche COBAS TaqMan48 [CTM48] HCV) after manual and automated RNA extraction. The purposes were to determine (i) assay performance characteristics using manual and automated RNA extraction methods, (ii) whether measurable range and limit of detection (LOD) of the ASR assay were influenced by genotype, and (iii) correlation of quantification by CTM48 HCV ASR and COBAS Monitor HCV v. 2.0. For HCV genotype 1 (Gt1), the lower limits of quantification after manual extraction were slightly lower than those for automated extraction (1.0 versus 1.5 log(10) IU/ml). Results were linear up to the highest concentration tested after extraction by both methods (manual, 6.1 log(10); automated, 6.4 log(10)). Similar results were obtained for Gt2 (1.8 to 6.8 log(10) IU/ml) and Gt3 (1.6 to 6.8 log(10) IU/ml) after automated extraction. The LOD of Gt1 virus was 10 IU/ml after manual extraction and between 25 and 37.5 IU/ml after automated extraction. Results with Gt2 and Gt3 viruses were similar after automated extraction (Gt2, between 25 and 50 IU/ml; Gt3, 25 IU/ml). Variability (intrarun and interrun, at concentrations throughout the range of quantification) was 相似文献   

Clinical performance of the LCx HCV RNA quantitative assay

This study was conducted to assess the performance of the Abbott laboratories LCx HCV RNA Quantitative Assay (LCx assay) in the clinical setting. Four clinical laboratories measured LCx assay precision, specificity, and linearity. In addition, a method comparison was conducted between the LCx assay and the Roche HCV Amplicor Monitor, version 2.0 (Roche Monitor 2.0) and the Bayer VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 Assay (Bayer bDNA 3.0) quantitative assays. For precision, the observed LCx assay intra-assay standard deviation (S.D.) was 0.060-0.117 log IU/ml, the inter-assay S.D. was 0.083-0.133 log IU/ml, the inter-lot S.D. was 0.105-0.177 log IU/ml, the inter-site S.D. was 0.099-0.190 log IU/ml, and the total S.D. was 0.113-0.190 log IU/ml. The specificity of the LCx assay was 99.4% (542/545; 95% CI, 98.4-99.9%). For linearity, the mean pooled LCx assay results were linear (r=0.994) over the range of the panel (2.54-5.15 log IU/ml). A method comparison demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.881 between the LCx assay and Roche Monitor 2.0, 0.872 between the LCx assay and Bayer bDNA 3.0, and 0.870 between Roche Monitor 2.0 and Bayer bDNA 3.0. The mean LCx assay result was 0.04 log IU/ml (95% CI, -0.08, 0.01) lower than the mean Roche Monitor 2.0 result, but 0.57 log IU/ml (95% CI, 0.53, 0.61) higher than the mean Bayer bDNA 3.0 result. The mean Roche Monitor 2.0 result was 0.60 log IU/ml (95% CI, 0.56, 0.65) higher than the mean Bayer bDNA 3.0 result. The LCx assay quantitated genotypes 1-4 with statistical equivalency. The vast majority (98.9%, 278/281) of paired LCx assay-Roche Monitor 2.0 specimen results were within 1 log IU/ml. Similarly, 86.6% (240/277) of paired LCx assay and Bayer bDNA 3.0 specimen results were within 1 log, as were 85.6% (237/277) of paired Roche Monitor 2.0 and Bayer specimen results. These data demonstrate that the LCx assay may be used for quantitation of HCV RNA in HCV-infected individuals.