Nuclear expression of maspin is associated with a lower recurrence rate and a longer disease-free interval after surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx

AIMS: Maspin, a protein belonging to the serpin superfamily, is the product of a tumour suppressor gene. Tissue distribution studies have shown maspin expression in normal mammary epithelial cells, in the placenta, prostate, thymus, testis, oral cavity, small intestine, skin, and cornea. Maspin is expressed but down-regulated in human breast, prostatic, and colonic cancers but apparently up-regulated in pancreatic, ovarian, and gastric cancers. Only two studies concerning maspin expression in head and neck carcinomas are available. The present study is the first attempt to determine maspin expression in laryngeal carcinoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: Maspin expression was evaluated in 21 cases of laryngeal carcinoma consecutively treated with an exclusively surgical approach with a follow-up period longer than 24 months. The expression of p53, p27 and MIB-1 was also studied. Two patterns of distribution of maspin in laryngeal neoplastic cells were found. Cytoplasmic expression of maspin was identified in 47.6% of the cases. Nuclear maspin positivity was determined in 47.6% of the cases. A statistically significant difference in nuclear maspin expression between the group of patients without carcinoma recurrence and the group with evidence of recurrence was demonstrated (P = 0.039). Log rank test analysis showed a statistically significant direct correlation between nuclear maspin expression and disease-free intervals after surgical treatment calculated in months (P = 0.028). A significant inverse correlation was disclosed between nuclear maspin staining and MIB-1 (P = 0.028). A trend of increasing p27 expression was noted in cases with positive nuclear maspin expression. Nuclear maspin expression was not statistically correlated with p53 expression. A trend towards direct correlation between cytoplasmic maspin expression and squamous cell carcinoma histological grade (G) was apparent. Cytoplasmic maspin expression did not correlate with p53, MIB-1 or p27 expression. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that nuclear location of maspin is a good prognostic factor in laryngeal carcinoma.     

Decline in the expression of the serine proteinase inhibitor maspin is associated with tumour progression in ductal carcinomas of the breast

Maspin is an inhibitor of serine proteinases with tumour suppressor activity. Its expression appears to be reduced in advanced stages of breast cancer. A large series of archival breast tissue specimens has been examined, including normal glands (n=7), fibrocystic change (n=22), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS, n=12), infiltrating carcinomas (n=128) and their lymph node metastases (n=65), using a specific monoclonal antibody. Myoepithelium invariably showed strong maspin expression. In epithelial cells, the strongest expression was found in normal breast and fibrocystic change. A significant stepwise decrease in maspin expression (p<0.0001) occurred in the sequence DCIS - invasive cancer - lymph node metastasis. However, a subset of infiltrating carcinomas showed strong maspin expression, significantly associated with a lower rate of lymph node metastasis at the time of diagnosis (p<0.01). This was independent of tumour size and grade. The in vivo observations presented here are in keeping with data obtained in prior in vitro experiments. Maspin emerges as an indicator of tumour progression and metastatic potential, and might be exploited to predict breast cancer prognosis. According to in vitro data, its tumour suppressor activity is likely to involve both the modulation of cell motility/invasiveness and the inhibition of angiogenesis.     

Clinicopathological significance of maspin expression in breast cancer

Maspin is a unique serine proteinase inhibitor that has tumor suppressor activity. It has been reported that maspin is expressed in normal human mammary epithelial cells and it is down-regulated during the progression of cancer. However, to date, there is very limited data on the clinical significance of maspin expression in human breast cancer. In this study, maspin expression was assessed immunohistochemically from 80 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) specimens of the breast. Also, maspin expression was compared with the clinicopathological factors (age, grade, tumor size and lymph node status), the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and p53, DNA ploidy and the overall survival in an attempt to assess its prognostic value. The maspin expression was positive in 25 IDC cases (31.3%). The maspin expression in IDC was significantly correlated with a higher histologic grade, a larger tumor size, a positive p53 status and shorter survival. There was an inverse association with maspin expression and the PR status. These findings suggest that maspin expression is not down-regulated with the progression of cancer and maspin expression may be associated with a poor prognosis. The immunohistochemical detection of maspin in breast cancers may be helpful for predicting an aggressive phenotype.     

Maspin and p53 protein expression in gastric adenocarcinoma and its clinical applications.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of maspin and p53 expression in the progression of gastric cancer, and its value as a prognostic indicator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The expression of maspin and p53 in 152 cases of gastric cancer was detected by immunohistochemistry and compared with the clinicopathologic tumor parameters. The relationship between maspin and p53 expression was also analyzed in the gastric cancers. RESULTS: The positive expression rates for maspin and p53 in the cancers were 71.7% (109 of 152 cases) and 56.6% (86 of 152 cases), respectively. Two patterns of immunostaining for maspin were seen in the maspin-positive gastric cancer cases: cytoplasm-only staining (67.0%, 73 of 109 cases) and staining of both cytoplasm and nucleus (33.0%, 36 of 109 cases). Maspin expression showed a negative association with histologic grade, depth of invasion, metastasis, and TNM stage (all P<0.05). p53 expression showed an association with node metastasis, and TNM stage (both P<0.05). Maspin expression was negatively correlated with p53 expression (P<0.001, r=-0.291). In univariate log-rank analysis, loss of maspin expression, histologic grade, distant metastasis, and TNM stage were associated with patient survival. Interestingly, patients with nuclear and cytoplasmic maspin expression survived longer than those with only cytoplasmic expression. However, in multivariate analysis TNM stage and regional node metastasis were the only independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Maspin expression might be an important factor in tumor progression and patient prognosis, but is not an independent prognostic factor. Maspin expression is inversely correlated with mutant p53 expression in gastric cancer, which suggests that maspin expression is regulated by the p53 pathway.     

Expression of maspin is up-regulated during the progression of mammary ductal carcinoma

AIMS: The tumour suppressor gene maspin is reported to inhibit the motility, invasiveness and metastasis of breast cancer cells. Maspin is expressed in normal mammary myoepithelial cells but is down-regulated during the progression of ductal carcinoma. However, we recently reported that maspin expression was frequently observed in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) with an aggressive phenotype, and it was a strong indicator of a poor prognosis. To our knowledge, to date, there has been no report investigating maspin expression in a large series of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS AND RESULTS: To clarify whether there is down-regulation during the progression of ductal carcinoma, we immunohistochemically investigated the expression of maspin in 145 DCIS, 92 invasive ductal carcinomas with a predominant intraductal component as well as 94 usual ductal hyperplasias and 27 atypical ductal hyperplasias. The expression of maspin in carcinoma cells was observed in 9.6% (14 of 145) of DCIS and 18.5% (17 of 92) of IDC with a predominant intraductal components. It significantly correlated with larger tumour size (P = 0.013; P = 0.042), higher histological grade (P = 0.015; P = 0.0003) and the presence of comedo-necrosis (P = 0.000005; P = 0.0074) in DCIS and IDC with a predominant intraductal components, respectively. In epithelial cells, the expression of maspin was observed in only one case of usual ductal hyperplasia, and all cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia were negative. CONCLUSIONS: These results and our previous investigation in which 27.4% of IDC were positive for maspin suggest that the expression of maspin in epithelial cells could be up-regulated during the progression of ductal carcinoma, and that it could be correlated with the acquisition of an aggressive phenotype.     

Maspin expression in carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma

AIMS: To investigate the presence and distribution of the protein maspin in carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA).METHODS: Maspin expression was studied by means of immunohistochemistry in 16 cases of CXPA, using the labelled polymer method.RESULTS: According to the extent of invasion, the tumours were subdivided into: intracapsular (five cases), minimally invasive (four cases), and invasive (seven cases). Twelve patients had carcinoma with only epithelial differentiation, whereas four had a malignant myoepithelial component. Non-luminal cells in the duct-like structures of the remnant pleomorphic adenoma were strongly positive for maspin, whereas only a few luminal cells were immunopositive. A few positive cells were seen in the frequent hypocellular and hyalinised areas. Maspin was abundantly expressed, mainly in non-luminal cells, in transitional areas of CXPA with only epithelial differentiation. In frankly carcinomatous areas there was a gradual decrease in maspin expression. Almost all cells were maspin positive in CXPA with a myoepithelial component. When present, luminal cells were in general negative for maspin.CONCLUSIONS: When only epithelial cells undergo malignant transformation, maspin expression is gradually lost. In cases with a myoepithelial component, maspin expression is high, and this might be related to the tumour suppressor activity attributed to this cell.     

Maspin expression in CIN 3, microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma, and invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Maspin is a serine protease inhibitor with tumor suppression activity. It is expressed in normal breast and prostate tissue but is downregulated or absent in breast and prostate tumors. Recent reports have shown that decreased expression is associated with a greater propensity for metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinomas. We know that some high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia progress to invasive carcinomas while others either persist at the same degree of atypia or regress. The pattern of maspin expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 3, microinvasive squamous carcinomas and overtly invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix was studied to determine the relationship between the extent of maspin expression and the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia to squamous cell carcinoma. In total, 36 cases were evaluated: 18 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 3, seven cases of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma and 11 cases of invasive squamous cell carcinoma. A monoclonal antibody was used on paraffin-embedded tissues. Immunoreactivity was scored semiquantitatively using a scale of 0-3. The sums of the scores of the different groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. A significant decrease in maspin scores was noted between cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 3 vs invasive squamous cell carcinoma (P<0.005), microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma vs invasive squamous cell carcinoma (P<0.05), and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 3 vs tumor emboli (P<0.005). Although not statistically significant, scores of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 3 associated with invasive squamous cell carcinoma were lower compared to that cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 3 without invasive squamous cell carcinoma. These findings suggest that maspin likely plays a role in disease progression from in situ to invasive carcinoma. Virtual absence of maspin immunopositivity in tumor emboli indicates that maspin may also play a role in metastasis.     

Maspin expression in invasive breast cancer: association with other prognostic factors

Maspin is a unique serine protease inhibitor with a molecular weight of 42 kDa. It has been shown to inhibit tumour cell motility and invasion in cell culture, and tumour growth and metastasis in animal models. There is very limited data on the prognostic utility of maspin in human breast cancer. We performed a preliminary study to assess the associations of maspin with other established prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer (IBC). 1068 paraffin-embedded IBCs were immunohistochemically stained with a monoclonal antibody to maspin. A nuclear signal was present in 96% and a cytoplasmic signal in 35% of the cases. Nuclear staining was related to oestrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positivity (p < 0.0001), but not to S-phase fraction (SPF) or ploidy. Cytoplasmic staining was related to ER and PR negativity (p < 0.0001), high SPF (p < 0.0001), and aneuploidy (p = 0.003). Thus, maspin nuclear staining was significantly associated with good prognostic factors, while cytoplasmic staining was associated with poor prognostic markers. These findings suggest that the presence of maspin in two different compartments of the cell may have different biological and clinical implications. Additional studies are needed to evaluate further this expression profile of maspin in breast cancer.     

Simultaneous evaluation of maspin and CXCR4 in patients with breast cancer

AIM: To study simultaneously the actions of maspin and CXCR4, which share several similar pathways in cancer, including apoptosis and angiogenesis. METHODS: Our material consisted of 151 invasive breast carcinomas arranged in a tissue microarray setting. Maspin and CXCR4 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Microvessel density was assessed by CD34 immunodetection and apoptosis by the Tdt-mediated dUTP nick end labelling assay. RESULTS: Maspin expression was related to CXCR4 expression, apoptosis, patient age and the Nottingham prognostic index. The expression of both maspin and CXCR4 progressively increased in high-grade tumours. In patients with lymph node negative breast cancer, maspin overexpression was associated with increased risk of death. High CXCR4 expression was associated with prolonged survival of patients with high maspin expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that maspin overexpression could prove to be a potentially useful marker, especially for the clinically important group of patients with lymph node negative breast cancer. The expression of CXCR4 is of less significance in our study, but may be informative for specific patient subsets or in a longer time frame.     

Cell-type-specific repression of the maspin gene is disrupted frequently by demethylation at the promoter region in gastric intestinal metaplasia and cancer cells

Maspin, a serine protease inhibitor, was originally reported as a tumor suppressor gene in breast and prostatic cancers. We examined maspin expression and/or the allele-specific methylation status in four gastric cancer cell lines, as well as normal, metaplastic, and cancerous epithelia obtained from 50 gastric cancer patients. Three gastric cancer cell lines exhibiting maspin overexpression showed hypomethylation at either both alleles or a haploid allele. Only one cell line (GCIY) was maspin-negative but maspin expression was reactivated after treatment with a demethylating agent, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. Dense and diffuse immunoreactivity for maspin was observed in 40 (80%) of 50 gastric cancers and all gastric normal epithelia (GNE) with intestinal metaplasia (IM), but not in GNE without IM. We further analyzed the allele-specific methylation status in 10 of 50 cases subjected to immunohistochemistry by the crypt isolation technique followed by a bisulfite genome sequencing method. The maspin gene promoter region of all GNE without IM was hypermethylated on both alleles whereas those with IM frequently represented the haploid type of hypomethylation status. In six of seven gastric cancers in which crypt isolation was possible, demethylation frequently occurred and extended to both alleles. Maspin mRNA was amplified from GNE with IM and cancerous crypts but not from GNE without IM. These results suggest that demethylation at the maspin gene promoter disrupts the cell-type-specific gene repression in both GNE and gastric cancer.     

Elevated nuclear maspin expression is associated with microsatellite instability and high tumour grade in colorectal cancer

Maspin, a member of the serpin family, has been reported to suppress metastasis and angiogenesis in breast and prostate cancers. Overexpression of maspin was associated with adverse prognostic features in several other tumours. In this study, expression of maspin was analysed in 41 colorectal carcinomas with high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and 159 microsatellite stable colorectal cancers (MSS/MSI-L) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and partly by relative quantitative real-time RT-PCR and western blot analyses. Significant upregulation of maspin expression was found in MSI-H tumours compared to both MSS/MSI-L tumours and matched benign colonic mucosa. Increased maspin expression was also found in three MSI-H colon cancer cell lines, but not in three MSS colon cancer cell lines by RT-PCR and western blot analyses. Regulation of maspin expression depended on promoter methylation as tissue specimens and cell lines expressing maspin showed unmethylated maspin promoters, whereas promoter hypermethylation was found in specimens with loss of maspin expression. Intense nuclear maspin immunostaining was seen specifically in MSI-H tumours (p = 0.013), de-differentiated tumours (p = 0.006), and at the invasion front. These findings provide new insights into the role of maspin in colorectal cancer progression and may be useful for diagnosis and treatment strategies.     

Prognostic significance of maspin in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: tissue microarray analysis of 223 surgically resected cases.

Maspin (SERPINB5), a serine proteinase inhibitor, was first identified as a potential tumor suppressor on the basis of its differential expression between normal mammary epithelial cells and human breast carcinoma cell lines. Recent studies have shown that maspin might be a prognostic tumor marker. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma acquires maspin expression through hypomethylation of the maspin promoter. However, no study has investigated the prognostic significance of maspin expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. In this study, we investigated maspin protein expression in a large series of 223 surgically resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas using immunohistochemical staining and high throughput tissue microarrays. Maspin expression was correlated with postoperative survival and other clinicopathologic factors. Maspin was detected in 209 of these 223 (94% cases) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas including 39 (18% cases) focal (5-50% tumor cells) and 170 (76% cases) diffuse (>50% tumor cells). Fourteen (or 6% cases) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas did not show maspin expression by immunohistochemical staining (<5% tumor cells). Normal ductal epithelium is not labeled with maspin. Overexpression of maspin in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with worse postoperative survival especially in patients whose tumors exhibit diffuse expression of maspin. After adjusting other clinicopathologic factors, maspin expression remains to be an independent adverse prognosticator for postoperative survival. Maspin expression is not associated with patient age, gender, tumor size, tumor pathologic stage, lymph node status, and vascular invasion or perineural invasion. Nuclear labeling of maspin is associated with better tumor differentiation although this staining pattern is not associated with a better prognosis. In addition, maspin overexpression is also observed in 48% low-grade (grades 1a and 1b) pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs) and 78% high-grade (grades 2 and 3) PanINs, suggesting that maspin upregulation occurs early during the multi-step progression model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.     

Nuclear localization of maspin is essential for its inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis

Maspin (mammary serine protease inhibitor or SerpinB5) acts as a tumor suppressor when overexpressed in aggressive cancer cell lines. However, its role in human cancer is controversial. Maspin expression has been associated with a poor prognosis in some studies, whereas in others, with favorable outcome. The clinical data suggest, however, that nuclear-localized maspin is associated with improved survival. We hypothesized that the tumor suppressor activity of maspin may require nuclear localization, and that the discordance between clinical and experimental reports is a consequence of the variable subcellular distribution of maspin. Furthermore, we surmized that nuclear maspin could function as a tumor suppressor through the regulation of genes involved in tumor growth and invasion. Maspin or maspin fused to a nuclear export signal were expressed in metastatic human breast and epidermoid carcinoma cell lines. We found that pan-cellular localized maspin inhibited in vivo tumor growth and metastasis when assessed in xenograft chicken embryo and murine mammary fat pad injection models. However, when maspin was excluded from the nucleus via a nuclear exclusion signal, it no longer functioned as a metastasis suppressor. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, we show that nuclear maspin was enriched at the promoter of colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) and associated with diminished levels of CSF-1 mRNA. Our findings demonstrate that the nuclear localization of maspin is required for its tumor and metastasis suppressor functions in vivo, and suggest that its mechanism of action involves, in part, direct association of maspin with target genes.     

High frequency of coexpression of maspin with p63 and p53 in squamous cell carcinoma but not in adenocarcinoma of the lung

Maspin, a member of the serpin family of protease inhibitors, has been shown to inhibit tumor growth and suppress metastasis in several malignancies, including lung cancer. Previous studies have reported that p63 and p53 control maspin expression by transactivating the promoter. The present study analyzed immunohistochemical studies to determine the expression and coexpression patterns of maspin, p63 and p53 in non-small cell lung carcinoma, specifically squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. The results showed that 83/86 cases (96.5%) of squamous cell carcinoma and 82/161 cases (50.9%) of adenocarcinoma included in this study were positive for maspin. There were 79/86 cases (91.9%) of squamous cell carcinoma and 16/161 cases (9.9%) of adenocarcinoma with positive expression for p63. In addition, 77/86 cases (89.5%) of squamous cell carcinoma and 99/161 cases (61.5%) of adenocarcinoma were positive for p53. Maspin, p63 and p53 expression were each significantly higher in squamous cell carcinoma than adenocarcinoma. Squamous cell carcinomas more highly coexpress maspin and p63, as well as maspin and p53, when compared with adenocarcinomas. The high frequency of coexpression of maspin and p63, as well as maspin and p53, in squamous cell carcinoma, suggests that p63 and p53 may be involved in the pathway to control maspin expression. Therapeutic targeting on maspin, p63 and p53 molecules might be beneficial in the management of patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the lung in the future.     

Maspin is useful in the distinction of pancreatic adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis: a tissue microarray based study.

Maspin, a member of the serpin family of serine protease inhibitors, has been shown to limit invasion and metastases in breast and prostate carcinomas. Maspin gene expression is up-regulated in pancreatic cancer, but not in normal pancreatic tissue. Maspin expression has been documented using immunohistochemical studies in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and high-grade intraductal dysplasia. We studied pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and chronic pancreatitis utilizing tissue microarray technology to determine the utility of maspin in differentiating these lesions. Immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarrays made from 72 cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and 24 cases of chronic pancreatitis. Carcinomas were graded as well, moderately, or poorly differentiated using the WHO criteria. The primary antibody used was monoclonal antimaspin antibody (clone G167-70, 1:800, PharMingen, San Diego, CA). Nuclear and/or cytoplasmic staining for maspin was qualitatively scored from 1 + to 3 + based on intensity. Cases were considered positive if one or more cores demonstrated staining. Cases of chronic pancreatitis showed focal, weak (1 + to 2 +) staining within occasional benign ductal epithelial cells in 29% of cases (7/24). Diffuse and intense (3 +) staining was present in ducts with squamous metaplasia (3 cases). The majority of ducts showed no staining. Ductal adenocarcinomas showed diffuse staining in 91% (66/72) of cases with generally more intense staining than cases of chronic pancreatitis. Maspin may be helpful in differentiating ductal adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis, once squamous metaplasia is ruled out.     

Maspin Expression in Myoepithelial Tumors of the Breast

Maspin is a mammary inhibitory serine protease that harbors tumor suppressor, tumor invasiveness-suppression and anti-angiogenic properties. It is consistently expressed by mammary myoepithelial cells. However, to the best of our knowledge, no assessment of maspin immunoexpression in myoepithelial cell lesions of the breast has been reported so far. We evaluated maspin expression by immunohistochemistry in five normal breast samples, one sclerosing papilloma (SP), one tubular adenomyoepithelioma (TA), one adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), one epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the breast (EMC), and one malignant adenomyoepithelioma (MA). We also compared maspin expression with the expression of other classic myoepithelial markers in myoepithelial and secretory cells, as well as in stromal components of all samples. In normal breast samples, maspin expression was restricted to myoepithelial cell nuclei and cytoplasm. A strong nuclear and cytoplasmic maspin immunoreactivity was observed in the myoepithelial components of SP, TA, ACC, and EMC. In MA, maspin immunoreactivity was confined to the nucleus and cytoplasm of the cells lining tubular-like and papillary structures, as well as in squamous cells. The myoepithelial nature of maspin-positive cells was further confirmed by classic myoepithelial cell markers, including -actin and S-100 protein. No stromal, neural or vascular components were immunostained by maspin. In spite of the small number of myoepithelial lesions here assessed, we suggest that maspin should be used in surgical pathology practice either as an additional marker in immunohistochemical panels defining a myoepithelial histogenesis in odd breast neoplasms, or in those cases in which the definite diagnosis relies on the myoepithelial cell layer identification.     

Nuclear and cytoplasmic Maspin expression in primary non-small cell lung cancer

AIM: To investigate whether nuclear and cytoplasmic Maspin expression is associated with distinct clinicopathological parameters and TP53 expression in a representative series of primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Tissue microarrays (n=487) were used to immunohistochemically analyse expression of Maspin and TP53. Cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of Maspin was scored on the basis of the percentage of positive tumour cells. Univariate analysis of clinicopathological variables potentially affecting tumour-specific survival was performed. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical Maspin expression (nuclear and cytoplasmic) was informative in 72.3% (352/487) of cases. Cytoplasmic and nuclear Maspin immunoreactivity in >or=10% of tumour cells was detected in 37.8% (133/352) and 65.3% (230/352) of informative cases, respectively. Nuclear and cytoplasmic Maspin staining was observed more frequently in primary squamous cell carcinomas than in other lung cancer types. Only nuclear Maspin immunoreactivity was significantly associated with positive TP53 staining. Cytoplasmic or nuclear Maspin expression was not associated with tumour-specific survival. CONCLUSION: Maspin expression was found both in the nucleus and the cytoplasm of NSCLC, more frequently in squamous cell carcinomas. However, no association with tumour-specific survival could be demonstrated.     

Loss of maspin is a helpful prognosticator in colorectal cancer: a tissue microarray analysis

Mammary serpin (Maspin) belongs to the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) superfamily and has been identified as a tumor suppressor. In addition, a p53-dependent regulatory pathway of maspin in human cancer has been indicated. The role of maspin in the tumorigenesis and progression of colorectal cancer is still unclear. Therefore, the first aim of the present study was to determine the prognostic value of maspin protein expression for the recurrence-free and overall survival of patients with colorectal carcinoma undergoing left- or right-sided colectomy. Secondly, maspin expression was correlated with p53 protein expression to gain additional information about a possible regulatory influence of the wild-type p53 protein on maspin; it was also correlated with further patient and tumor characteristics (age, sex, TNM, disease stage, tumor localization, and grading). An immunohistochemical study was performed on 280 carcinoma specimens using the tissue microarray technique. In addition, 80 colorectal adenomas and 60 tumor-free tissues were investigated. Maspin protein expression was detectable in 88-100% of the adenomas and non-tumorous tissues and in 193 out of 280 carcinoma patients (69%; maspin-positive). After a median follow-up of 102 months (23-140 months), the median recurrence-free survival was 80 months for maspin-positive cases (M +) and 42 months for maspin-negative cases (M-) (p = 0.02). The median long-term survival was 98 months for M + and 57 months for M- (p = 0.03). After 5 years, M + and M- patients had a total survival of 69% and 38%, and, after 10 years, 45% and 9%, respectively. Mutant type p53 expression was detectable in 178 colorectal carcinomas (64%). Mt p53 was positive in 91 out of 193 M + (47%) compared with 87 of 87 M- (100%, p<0.001). This study showed that loss of maspin protein correlates with p53 protein activity, with a higher likelihood for the development of tumor relapse, and with a decreased recurrence-free and overall survival in colorectal carcinomas. The determination of the immunohistochemical expression status of maspin might be a helpful independent prognosticator and an applicable tool for the development of therapeutic strategies for patients with this disease.     

Elevated expression of LSD1 (Lysine-specific demethylase 1) during tumour progression from pre-invasive to invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

ABSTRACT: AimLysine-specific demethylase1 (LSD1) is a nuclear protein which belongs to the aminooxidase-enzymes playing an important role in controlling gene expression. It has also been found highly expressed in several human malignancies including breast carcinoma. Our aim was to detect LSD1 expression also in pre-invasive neoplasias of the breast. In the current study we therefore analysed LSD1 protein expression in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in comparison to invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC). METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry we systematically analysed LSD1 expression in low grade DCIS (n = 27), intermediate grade DCIS (n = 30), high grade DCIS (n = 31) and in invasive ductal breast cancer (n = 32). SPSS version 18.0 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: LSD1 was differentially expressed in DCIS and invasive ductal breast cancer. Interestingly, LSD1 was significantly overexpressed in high grade DCIS versus low grade DCIS. Differences in LSD1 expression levels were also statistically significant between low/intermediate DCIS and invasive ductal breast carcinoma. CONCLUSION: LSD1 is also expressed in pre-invasive neoplasias of the breast. Additionally, there is a gradual increase of LSD1 expression within tumour progression from pre-invasive DCIS to invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Therefore upregulation of LSD1 may be an early tumour promoting event.