Aborting a Migraine Attack: Naproxen Sodium v Ergotamine plus Caffeine

SYNOPSIS
The tolerability and efficacy of naproxen sodium and of ergotamine tartrate plus caffeine (ergotamine) were compared in the treatment of acute migraine attacks and associated symptoms. In this multicenter, double-blind, parallel study of up to six headaches over a 3-month period, patients took naproxen sodium 825 mg, ergotamine 2 mg, or placebo at the time of the first symptom of an attack; 30 minutes later, if necessary, patients repeated naproxen sodium 275 mg, ergotamine 1 mg or placebo, as appropriate. Rescue medication was allowed 30 minutes following the second dose if needed. Active drugs provided notably better relief of head pain than did placebo; 1 hour following the first dose the difference between naproxen sodium and placebo was statistically significant. Naproxen sodium was as efficacious as ergotamine in the relief of migraine attacks and associated symptoms. Relief of vomiting, nausea, photophobia, and motor symptoms favored naproxen sodium over ergotamine; these differences were statistically significant for nausea and motor symptoms. Ergotamine-treated patients reported more complaints and had more severe and longer-lasting complaints than patients on the other two regimens. Overall tolerance ratings by both investigators and patients indicated that naproxen sodium and placebo were tolerated significantly better than ergotamine.     

Naproxen sodium in the treatment of migraine

Seventy patients with classical or common migraine were treated during their attacks with either naproxen sodium or placebo in a randomised, double-blind parallel group study. The initial dose of naproxen sodium was 825 mg followed one hour later by a further 550 mg, if symptoms were the same or had improved. If the migraine symptoms had worsened, patients were offered an escape analgesic combination of 1000 mg paracetamol and 10 mg metoclopramide. Patients were assessed at monthly intervals for changes in the severity and duration of headache, premonitory symptoms (mainly visual disturbances) and photophobia, nausea and vomiting associated with migraine attacks that had occurred since the previous visit. Patients were studied for a maximum of ten attacks and significant improvement was observed in the severity and duration of headache when the patients were on naproxen sodium. Also the premonitory symptoms and photophobia improved significantly on naproxen sodium and significantly less rescue analgesics were required. Patients suffering from common migraine had less severe headaches and photophobia when taking naproxen sodium than when taking placebo and the headaches were shorter in duration and patients took less rescue analgesic. No significant difference was observed between the treatment groups in patients with classical migraine. Ten patients in the placebo group and six in the naproxen sodium group reported side-effects but these were possibly related to the use of rescue medication. Naproxen sodium proved safe and effective in common migraine attacks, but in this study efficacy was not established for classical migraine.     

Medical therapy for menstrual migraine

A menstrual migraine occurs in approximately 7-10 % of women suffering from migraine. The migraine occurs from 2 days before until 3 days after the end of the menstrual period. The choice of treatment depends on the duration of the attack, which ranges from 3 to 7 days. An attack of up to 3 days duration should be treated with acetylsalicylic acid, ergotamine tartrate or naproxen, each in combination with an antiemetic (domperidone, metoclopramide). If there is no response, sumatriptan can be administered orally (25-100 mg) or subcutaneously (6 mg). In the attacks continue for more than 3 days, short-term prophylaxis with naproxen or the application of an estrogen-containing patch is indicated. Neither ovulation inhibitors nor traditional migraine prophylaxis has an influence on menstrual migraine. Patients should keep a headache diary. Short-term prophylaxis with ergotamine tartrate or tamoxifen is obsolete.     

Ergotamine vs. metoclopramide vs. their combination in acute migraine attacks

The effect of ergotamine tartrate was compared with that of the antiemetic agent metoclopramide and with those of two combinations in a double-blind trial of 24 adult female patients with migraine. The following combinations of the drugs were used in oral administration in a total of 176 acute migraine attacks: (a) Ergotamine 1 mg, (b) Metoclopramide 20 mg, (c) Ergotamine 1 mg + metoclopramide 20 mg, (d) Ergotamine 2 mg + metoclopramide 20 mg. The duration of attacks was significantly shorter on both of the combinations compared with the single drugs. The intensity of the pain was somewhat weaker and the appearance of nausea and vomiting somewhat but not significantly less during the combination treatments. In their overall opinion the patients favored the 2 mg + 20 mg combination significantly more than the others. Both ergotamine and metoclopramide are efficient in acute migraine attacks. Their combination seems to enhance the therapeutic response in some respects.     

Naproxen Sodium Versus Ergotamine Tartrate in the Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks

A double-blind parallel study compared the efficacy and safety of naproxen sodium (NPX) and ergotamine tartrate (ERG) as abortive therapy for acute headache in 79 patients with classical or common migraine. The design study was of the double-blind design. Forty-two patients completed the study. Discontinuation of treatment was generally due to lack of efficacy or adverse reactions. NPX was significantly better than ERG in the overall efficacy of treatment rated by the patients (p less than 004). NPX was comparable to ERG in reducing the severity and duration of the headache and its associated symptoms. In classical migraine, NPX was better than ERG in alleviating the severity of headache. Patients in the NPX group tended to use less rescue medication. There was no significant difference in the frequency of side-effects reported by the patients under NPX or ERG. This study demonstrates that NPX is as safe as ERG, and somewhat more effective in acute migraine attacks (although the difference is not statistically significant) and that migrainous patients tend to prefer NPX to ERG in treating their acute migraine headaches.     

Sublingual Flunarizine: a New Effective Management of the Migraine Attack. A Comparison versus Ergotamine

SYNOPSIS
Flunarizine was found to be effective in the acute treatment of isosorbide dinitrate induced migraine attacks, when given in a dosage of 10 mg sublingually.
The present study consists of two parts: in the first preliminary investigation, 7 out of 8 migraine patients who developed a typical migraine attack after isosorbide dinitrate were relieved of pain within about 10 minutes. On the basis of this result a second, randomized controlled open trial was performed, in which the acute efficacy of flunarizine was compared with ergotamine tartrate, 0.25 mg i.m., on 40 migraine patients. Flunarizine was found as effective as ergotamine (75% positive responses in the flunarizine group, 70% in the ergotamine group). The mean latency of the flunarizine effect was significantly lower than that of the ergotamine ( r < 0.001, Student's t test). Moreover sublingual flunarizine was found to be virtually devoid of side effects.     

Treatment of acute migraine attack: naproxen and placebo compared

A double-blind, cross-over, randomized study of acute migraine attack compared treatment results of naproxen with that of placebo. Each treatment period continued for either three months or six migraine attacks, whichever occurred first. The initial dose of naproxen was 750 mg, with additional 250-500 mg doses taken if and when required, to a maximum of five 250 mg tablets within a period of 24 h in each migraine attack. Forty-one patients were enrolled in the study; they had all experienced at least two but not more than eight migraine attacks a month during the preceding year. Thirty-two patients completed the two treatment periods. Naproxen was statistically significantly superior to placebo in reducing the severity of head pain, nausea, and photophobia; in shortening the duration of head pain, nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and lightheadedness; in diminishing the frequency of vomiting; and in decreasing the need for escape medication. Both patient and physician treatment preferences significantly favoured naproxen. Nine side effects were experienced by seven patients while receiving placebo and seven by five patients during naproxen treatment. Mild gastrointestinal discomfort was the main complaint. Only one patient withdrew from treatment because of a side effect, which occurred while receiving placebo.     

Abortive Migraine Therapy With Oral Naproxen Sodium Plus Metoclopramide Plus Ergotamine Tartrate With Caffeine

The oral tablet combination, (550 mgs. of naproxen sodium plus 10 mgs. of metoclopramide plus 1 mg. of ergotamine tartrate plus 100 mgs. of caffeine), was retrospectively studied in 63 patients who used it to abort migraine headaches. On the average, 84% of the headaches were totally aborted; minor side effects occurred in 40% of the patients, and 87% of the patients considered the combination superior to all prior treatments.     

A Comparative Trial of Ergotamine Tartrate, Acetyl Salicylic Acid and a Dextropropoxyphene Compound in Acute Migraine Attacks

SYNOPSIS
The effect of a dextropropoxyphene compound (Doleron(r)) was compared with that of ergotamine tartrate and acetyl salicylic acid on 525 acute migraine attacks in a double blind study of 25 adult female patients. Ergotamine and the dextropropoxyphene compound were approximately equally effective and significantly superior to acetyl salicylic acid in preventing the attacks entirely. In the cases in which the attack was only partially prevented, the dextropropoxyphene compound was more effective than ergotamine and acetyl salicylic acid in making the attacks milder and shorter. Side effects, especially gastrointestinal symptoms and fatigue, were less common with the dextropropoxyphene compound than from either of the two drugs. Probably for this reason, the patients' overall preference was clearly in favor of the dextropropoxyphene compound. The addition of dextropropoxyphene, a centrally active analgesic, to acetyl salicylic acid, gives an antimigraine compound which has an efficacy comparable with ergotamine but with less side effects.     

Bioavailability and antimigraine efficacy of effervescent ergotamine

SYNOPSIS
In about 20% of migraine patients treatment with enterally administrated ergotamine tartrate proves unsuccessful. One of the causes for this might be a poor systemic availability of the drug from the ordinary solid tablets. The present study aimed to investigate the bioavailability and the therapeutic value of ergotamine tartrate in effervescent form.
In twenty volunteers the plasma ergotamine levels were measured by using a radioimmunoassay after oral administration of 2.0 mg ergotamine tartrate combined with 50.0 mg caffeine in effervescent form. Measurable plasma drug levels were found in 14 (70%) of the subjects and the mean maximum plasma ergotamine level of 0.45 ng/ml was achieved at 30 minutes.
In the clinical part of the study 25 migraine patients treated their migraine attacks with effervescent ergotamine. The therapeutic value of it was considered as good by 9, moderate by 11 and poor by 5 of the patients. Among 18 of them the therapeutic effect seemed to be equal to their earlier ergotamine medications. The results indicate that the plasma pharmacokinetics of ergotamine tartrate in effervescent form is similar to and possibly faster on the absorptive phase than that reported earlier after enteral administration. In patients who do not gain benefit from the usual ergotamine tablets or suppositories, effervescent ergotamine would appear to be an alternative worth consideration.     

Placebo-controlled double-blind trial of pirprofen and an ergotamine tartrate compound in migraine attacks

Sixty-one patients, 16 with classic and 45 with common migraine, were treated during three subsequent attacks with pirprofen, a new inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis; an ergotamine tartrate compound; or placebo, in a randomized, double-blind multicentre study. Pain relief after a single dose and reduction of the attack intensity occurred most often with pirprofen in patients who needed more than one dose. Among them, however, the duration of attack was shortest with ergotamine. Working ability was well preserved with pirprofen, especially among patients with common migraine, and this treatment was ranked highest by the patients. However, no statistically significant differences were found between pirprofen and ergotamine. No serious side effects were observed with pirprofen. This study establishes the usefulness of pirprofen in the treatment of acute migraine.     

Treatment of the acute migraine attack current status

The main treatment of the acute migraine attack remains sleep, sedation, an anti-nauseant and analgesics, and in some patients 1 or 2 mg of ergotamine tartrate. Drugs containing large amounts of caffeine should not be used. Absorption of drugs may be impaired in a migraine attack. Metoclopramide is probably the anti-emetic of choice because it is an effective anti-nauseant and promotes normal gastrointestinal activity. Domperidone has a similar action but is said not to go through the blood-brain barrier, so is less likely to cause extrapyramidal reactions. All drugs, including analgesics such as aspirin and paracetamol, are best given in a soluble or effervescent form. Where vomiting occurs early in the attack, suppositories may be indicated. Ergotamine tartrate is necessary in about one third of attacks and is best given by suppository or by inhalation. Doses higher than 2 mg per attack or 6 mg in one week may cause toxic symptoms, the early signs of which are headache, nausea, vomiting and a feeling of not being very well. The non-drug treatments of an acute attack include pressing on the temporal artery, hot and cold compresses and relaxation.     

Prophylaxis of Migraine: A Comparison Between Naproxen Sodium and Pizotifen

SYNOPSIS
Seventy-four migraine sufferers were entered into a randomized, single-blind study to compare the prophylactic effects of naproxen sodium and pizotifen. 550 mg naproxen sodium twice daily or 0.5 mg pizotifen three times daily were given for up to three months. Response to treatment was determined by monthly clinical assessments and daily patient self-assessment.
Both groups showed a significant decline in both the severity of migraine (p=0.001) and in the frequency of attacks (p = 0.02). No significant differences were detected between groups.
Tolerance to both treatments was good. The most common adverse experience reported by the naproxen sodium treated patients was nausea (6 patients), whereas pizotifen gave rise to weight gain in five patients.
The study has shown that naproxen sodium is a useful prophylactic agent for migraine.     

Pharmacological synergy: the next frontier on therapeutic advancement for migraine

The burden of migraine significantly impacts the individual sufferer, their families, the workplace, and society. The World Health Organization has identified migraine as an urgent public health priority and has initiated a global initiative to reduce the burden of migraine. Underlying the World Health Organization initiative is the need to discover means of optimizing migraine treatments and make them accessible to the broader portion of the world population. Development of acute migraine medications over the past several decades has largely centered on engineering highly specific receptor molecules that alter migraine pathophysiological mechanisms to abort or reverse the acute attack of migraine. The first product of this line of discovery was sumatriptan and heralded as a landmark therapeutic breakthrough. Sumatriptan is a 5-HT-1B/D receptor agonist considered to activate receptors involved in the pathophysiology specific to migraine. Large-scale regulatory/clinical studies demonstrated statistical superiority for sumatriptan over placebo in reduction or elimination of headache, nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. Since the introduction of sumatriptan, 6 other triptan products have been released in the United States as acute treatments for migraine, all having the same mechanism of action and similar efficacy. Despite their utility as migraine abortive medications, the triptans do not successfully treat all attacks of migraine or necessarily treat all migraine associated symptoms. In fact, in less than 25% of attacks do subjects obtain and maintain a migraine-free response to treatment for at least beyond 24 hours. A wide range of non-triptan medications also have demonstrated efficacy in acute migraine. These include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, phenothiazines, and valproic acid to name a few. Given the distinctly different mechanisms of actions of these various medications, it is likely that several unique pathophysiological mechanisms are involved in terminating acute episodes of migraine. Clinicians now capitalize on this observation and use migraine medication in combination with another to improve patient outcomes, for example, using an antiemetic with an opioid or a triptan and NSAIDs. More recently, the Food and Drug Adminstration has approved a combination product containing 85mg of sumatriptan plus 500mg of naproxen sodium for acute treatment of migraine. Clinical trials conducted prior to approval demonstrated that the combination of sumatriptan and naproxen was more effective as a migraine abortive than either of its components but that each component and the combination were more effective than placebo. Exactly how sumatriptan and naproxen interact to create therapeutic synergism is unknown though its mere occurrence suggests that models assisting medical understanding and prediction of pharmacological synergism may improve clinical outcome over products acting through a single receptor mechanism. Migraine is a syndrome, meaning it is defined by observed symptoms rather than known pathophysiology. Multiple pathogenic mechanisms are likely involved in generating this diverse array of symptoms understood as the migraine symptom complex. Sumatriptan and naproxen have independent mechanisms of action and target distinct aspects of the vascular and inflammatory processes hypothesized to underlie migraine. Sumatriptan acts on the 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptors, whereas naproxen inhibits the COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes. Sumatriptan has vasoconstricting effects as well as effects on neurogenic inflammation by decreasing the release of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide. In contrast, naproxen affects prostaglandins and other inflammatory mediators. Because sumatriptan and naproxen both relieve migraine yet interact with different cellular targets within the migraine pathway, it is reasonable to assume there is a unique synergy between these medications that improves treatment outcomes. Clinical trials supported this contention by demonstrating the combination of sumatriptan/naproxen alleviated migraine pain quickly (primarily based on the sumatriptan mechanism of action), and sustained the response longer (primarily based on the naproxen mechanism of action) than is possible when either drug is given alone. The working hypothesis is that when sumatriptan and naproxen are given at the same time, they affect different mechanisms of the migraine pathway and produce an enhanced therapeutic effect. The purpose of this article is to apply statistical analyses to data from phase II and phase III studies of the combination of sumatriptan and naproxen to determine if this enhanced therapeutic effect is synergistic. This methodology of accessing synergy can be used in the development of future combination migraine treatments to improve treatment outcomes.     

Practice and Economics Cost Considerations in Headache Treatment Part 2: Acute Migraine Treatment

Today's physician has many useful medication options available for acute migraine treatment. There is a wide cost range among these drugs and today's health care environment demands that cost be factored into the decision process. Effective migraine abortive treatment decreases the costs of repeat dosing and disability. Early use of migraine abortive medication can increase its rapidity of action and effectiveness. Adjunctive medication such as metoclopramide ($0.10) is inexpensive and may improve the effectiveness of the primary abortive medication.
Over-the-counter medications such as aspirin ($0.02/325 mg), Excadrin· ($0.09/tablet), ibuprofen ($0.04/200 mg), or naproxen sodium ($0.09/220 mg) are inexpensive and effective. "Triple therapy" combining metoclopramide, a nonsteroidal ant-inflammatory agent, and an ergotamine preparation may improve tolerance and effectiveness of the ergot. Locally compounded dihydroergotamine nasal spray is inexpensive ($0.78/1 mg spray). The cost of using oral sumatriptan can be almost halved by prescribing half of a 50-mg tablet.
Emergency department services are expensive. Huge cost savings occur through self-controlled administration of oral, rectal, or even intramuscular narcotic medications. Oral narcotic agents such as hydromorphone ($0.42/4 mg) and meperidine ($0.92/200 mg) are generally used in inadequate doses to be effective for severe migraine. Guidelines are given for more effective use of these agents.
Sophisticated comparative studies are needed to evaluate, not only the direct costs of medications, but all costs of treatment of an acute migraine attack, as well as Indirect costs to the patient, family, and society.     

Acute Migraine Treatment in Adults

There are many options for acute migraine attack treatment, but none is ideal for all patients. This study aims to review current medical office‐based acute migraine therapy in adults and provides readers with an organized approach to this important facet of migraine treatment. A general literature review includes a review of several recent published guidelines. Acetaminophen, 4 nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (ibuprofen, acetylsalicylic acid [ASA], naproxen sodium, and diclofenac potassium), and 7 triptans (almotriptan, eletriptan, frovatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan) have good evidence for efficacy and form the core of acute migraine treatment. NSAID–triptan combinations, dihydroergotamine, non‐opioid combination analgesics (acetaminophen, ASA, and caffeine), and several anti‐emetics (metoclopramide, domperidone, and prochlorperazine) are additional evidence‐based options. Opioid containing combination analgesics may be helpful in specific patients, but should not be used routinely. Clinical features to be considered when choosing an acute migraine medication include usual headache intensity, usual rapidity of pain intensity increase, nausea, vomiting, degree of disability, patient response to previously used medications, history of headache recurrence with previous attacks, and the presence of contraindications to specific acute medications. Available acute medications can be organized into 4 treatment strategies, including a strategy for attacks of mild to moderate severity (strategy one: acetaminophen and/or NSAIDs), a triptan strategy for patients with severe attacks and for attacks not responding to strategy one, a refractory attack strategy, and a strategy for patients with contraindications to vasoconstricting drugs. Acute treatment of migraine attacks during pregnancy, lactation, and for patients with chronic migraine is also discussed. In chronic migraine, it is particularly important that medication overuse is eliminated or avoided. Migraine treatment is complex, and treatment must be individualized and tailored to the patient's clinical features. Clinicians should make full use of available medications and formulations in an organized approach.     

Double-blind study of naproxen vs placebo in the treatment of acute migraine attacks

Naproxen was compared with placebo in a double-blind, crossover trial in classic and common migraine. The trial was terminated at a fixed date; 37 patients had entered, 5 of whom were excluded. Naproxen was given as 750 mg at the first symptom of the attack, a total of 1250 mg per 24 h was allowed. Patients were followed for six attacks or three months in each phase, whichever came first. The severity of the headache was significantly less with naproxen in the first 2 h of the attack (p = 0.047), whereas there was no difference when the whole attack was considered. Significantly more patients preferred naproxen (p = 0.042). Side effects occurred in five patients, causing withdrawal of one patient while on naproxen.     

Frovatriptan <Emphasis Type="Italic">vs.</Emphasis> transdermal oestrogens or naproxen sodium for the prophylaxis of menstrual migraine

Acute treatment of menstrual migraine (MM) attacks is often incomplete and unsatisfactory, and perimenstrual prophylaxis with triptans, oestrogen supplementation or naproxen sodium may be needed for decreasing frequency and severity of the attack. In this pilot, open-label, non-randomised, parallel group study we evaluated, in 38 women with a history of MM, the efficacy of frovatriptan (n=14) 2.5 mg per os or transdermal oestrogens (n=10) 25 μg or naproxen sodium (n=14) 500 mg per os once-daily for the short-term prevention of MM. All treatments were administered in the morning for 6 days, beginning 2 days before the expected onset of menstrual headache. All women were asked to fill in a diary card, in the absence of (baseline) and under treatment, in order to score headache severity. All women reported at least one episode of MM at baseline. During treatment all patients taking transdermal oestrogens or naproxen sodium and 13 out of the 14 patients (93%) taking frovatriptan had at least one migraine attack (p=0.424). Daily incidence of migraine was significantly (p=0.045) lower under frovatriptan than under transdermal oestrogens or NS. At baseline, the overall median score of headache severity was 4.6, 4.2 and 4.3 in the group subsequently treated with frovatriptan, transdermal oestrogens and naproxen sodium, respectively (p=0.819). During treatment the median score was significantly lower under frovatriptan (2.5) than under transdermal oestrogens (3.0) and naproxen sodium (3.9, p=0.049). This was evident also for each single day of observation (p=0.016). Among treatments differences were particularly evident for the subgroup of patients with true MM (n=22) and for frovatriptan vs. naproxen sodium. This study suggests that short-term prophylaxis of MM with frovatriptan may be more effective than that based on transdermal oestrogens or naproxen sodium.     

Sumatriptan and naproxen sodium for the acute treatment of migraine

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of treatment with a combination of sumatriptan 50 mg (encapsulated) and naproxen sodium 500 mg administered concurrently in the acute treatment of migraine. BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of migraine involves multiple peripheral and central neural mechanisms that individually have been successful targets for acute (abortive) and preventive treatment. This suggests that multi-mechanism therapy, which acts on multiple target sites, may confer improved efficacy and symptom relief for patients with migraine. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, four-arm study. Participants (n = 972) treated a single moderate or severe migraine attack with placebo, naproxen sodium 500 mg, sumatriptan 50 mg, or a combination of sumatriptan 50 mg and naproxen sodium 500 mg. In the latter two treatment arms, the sumatriptan tablets were encapsulated in order to achieve blinding of the study. RESULTS: In the sumatriptan plus naproxen sodium group, 46% of subjects achieved 24-hour pain relief response (primary endpoint), which was significantly more effective than sumatriptan alone (29%), naproxen sodium alone (25%), or placebo (17%) (P < .001). Two-hour headache response also significantly favored the sumatriptan 50 mg plus naproxen sodium 500 mg therapy (65%) versus sumatriptan (49%), naproxen sodium (46%), or placebo (27%) (P < .001). A similar pattern of between-group differences was observed for 2-hour pain-free response and sustained pain-free response (P < .001). The incidence of headache recurrence up to 24 hours after treatment was lowest in the sumatriptan plus naproxen sodium group (29%) versus sumatriptan alone (41%; P = .048), versus naproxen sodium alone (47%; P= .0035), and versus placebo (38%; P= .08). The incidences of the associated symptoms of migraine were significantly lower at 2 hours following sumatriptan 50 mg plus naproxen sodium 500 mg treatment versus placebo (P < .001). The frequencies and types of adverse events reported did not differ between treatment groups, with dizziness and somnolence being the most common. CONCLUSIONS: This is among the first prospective studies to demonstrate that multi-mechanism acute therapy for migraine, combining a triptan and an analgesic, is well tolerated and offers improved clinical benefits over monotherapy with these selected standard antimigraine treatments. Specifically, sumatriptan 50 mg (encapsulated) and naproxen sodium 500 mg resulted in significantly superior pain relief as compared to monotherapy with either sumatriptan 50 mg (encapsulated) or naproxen sodium 500 mg for the acute treatment of migraine. Because encapsulation of the sumatriptan for blinding purposes may have altered its pharmacokinetic profile and thereby decreased the efficacy responses, additional studies are warranted that do not involve encapsulation of the active treatments and assess the true onset of action of multi-mechanism therapy in migraine. This study did show that the combination of sumatriptan and naproxen sodium was well tolerated and that there was no significant increase in the incidence of adverse events compared to monotherapy.     

A Comparative Study of Naproxen Sodium, Pizotyline and Placebo in Migraine Prophylaxis

SYNOPSIS
318 patients satisfying the Ad Hoc Committee's criteria for common or classical migraine were entered into an 8 week single-blind placebo recording phase to establish, by diary cards, the frequency and severity of their attacks. 176 patients completed this and had records indicating 4–8 episodes in the 8 week period, with sufficient severity to reduce activity and/or work; these patients wore randomized by a predetermined code, into three double-blinded groups: naproxen sodium 550 mg bid (60 patients), pizotyline 0.5 mg tid (59 patients), or placebo (57 patients). The patients wore followed at monthly intervals for 12 weeks, with 25 dropping out (3 on naproxen sodium, and 2 each on pizotyline and placebo because of "side effects;" the remaining 18 because of noncompliance or reasons unrelated to therapy). Approximately 25% of patients in each of the 3 groups complained of side effects.
Statistical analysis showed that both naproxen sodium and pizotyline were better than placebo, and of overall equivalent (i.e. equal) efficacy in the prophylaxis of migraine. In some respects, naproxen sodium was slightly more effective than pizotyline in the first month of treatment.